pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24520 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn

Mass-Transfer Control With Microbubbles in Highly Turbulent Decaying Flows

Vivek Kumar , Prasoon Suchandra , Jason Rom , Shivam Prajapati , Suhas Jain , Cyrus Aidun This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 01:25 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn
keywords microbubblesturbulent decaying flowssurface tensionbubble breakupcoalescencemass transfermultiphase flowshigh Reynolds turbulence
0
0 comments X

The pith

A minute surface tension reduction combined with extreme turbulence keeps bubbles small in decaying flows.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests the idea that a tiny surfactant dose lowering surface tension slightly can control bubble sizes in highly turbulent decaying flows produced by a multiphase pump in a straight duct. Without the additive, bubbles grow larger downstream because coalescence dominates over breakup, with the growth tied to the turbulent dissipation rate. The small surface tension change promotes breakup, limits coalescence, and produces a lower average bubble diameter plus a narrower size distribution, all while turbulence statistics stay the same within uncertainty. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach might supply a simple, scalable way to tune bubble populations and boost mass transfer in industrial gas-liquid processes.

Core claim

In a decaying turbulent flow with turbulent intensity of at least 40 percent and Taylor Reynolds number of order 1000, the mean bubble diameter increases monotonically downstream when surface tension remains unchanged because coalescence governs the statistics. Adding roughly 0.01 percent of the critical micelle concentration of surfactant reduces surface tension enough to shift the balance toward breakup, yielding a reduced mean diameter and narrower bubble-size distribution with no detectable change in turbulent kinetic energy, intensity, or dissipation rate.

What carries the argument

Slight reduction in surface tension σ used only as an interfacial tuning knob inside high-intensity decaying turbulence.

If this is right

  • Bubble-size distributions become narrower and more tunable by pairing turbulence level with small surface tension adjustments.
  • Smaller bubbles turn more breakup-prone, limiting downstream growth.
  • Mass transfer can be intensified in industrial multiphase flows through this low-complexity lever.
  • Turbulence metrics remain independent of the interfacial change.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same interfacial tuning could apply to other high-Reynolds-number multiphase configurations beyond straight-duct decaying flows.
  • Non-surfactant agents achieving identical surface tension reduction should produce equivalent bubble control if the interfacial premise holds.
  • The method might allow prediction of mass-transfer gains from measured increases in bubble surface area.

Load-bearing premise

The shifts in bubble size and distribution arise solely from the interfacial effect of the slight surface tension drop, with no undetected hydrodynamic or surfactant-specific influences.

What would settle it

Run the identical flow experiment with a non-surface-active additive that produces the same surface tension reduction and verify whether the bubble statistics change by the same amount.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24520 by Cyrus Aidun, Jason Rom, Prasoon Suchandra, Shivam Prajapati, Suhas Jain, Vivek Kumar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIGURE 1: Schematic of the experimental setup; also showing the components of the imaging system, raw and processed back-lit shadow view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2: Streamwise evolution of nomralised turbulent kinetic view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIGURE 3: The bubble-size distributions ( view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIGURE 4 view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIGURE 5: Streamwise evolution of mean diameter view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We hypothesize that combining extreme turbulence with a minute reduction in surface tension $\sigma$ (surface tension of the liquid) using surfactant provides a simple and scalable route for controlling micron scale bubble size in gas--liquid systems. To test this, we generate high-intensity turbulence using a multiphase pump [turbulent intensity $\ge 40\%$; Taylor Reynolds number $Re_\lambda=\mathcal{O}(10^3)$; bulk Reynolds number $Re=\mathcal{O}(10^5)$] feeding a straight duct, which produces a decaying turbulent flow where, without additives, bubble coalescence dominates and causes monotonic downstream growth in the mean diameter $d_\mathrm{avg}$ of the bubbles. This growth is governed by the turbulent dissipation rate $\varepsilon$. High-speed imaging, back-lit shadowgraph and particle shadow velocimetry (PSV) quantify bubble statistics ($d_\mathrm{avg}$, and the bubble-size distribution) and turbulence metrics (turbulent kinetic energy $k$, turbulence intensity $\mathcal{I}$, and dissipation rate $\varepsilon$). We then introduce a minute amount ($\sim 0.01\%$ critical micelle concentration) of additive that produces a slight reduction in $\sigma$, used here only as an interfacial tuning knob because the same change in surface tension can be achieved with non surface active agents. This small decrease in $\sigma$ enhances breakup, slightly suppresses coalescence, and makes smaller bubbles more breakup prone, resulting in reduced $d_\mathrm{avg}$ and a narrower bubble-size distribution. Turbulence statistics remain unchanged within experimental uncertainty, indicating that the effect arises entirely from interface rather than hydrodynamic changes. Overall, combining extreme turbulence with a minute reduction in surface tension offers a low complexity and tunable lever for setting bubble-size distributions and intensifying mass transfer in industrial multiphase flows.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper claims that in highly turbulent decaying flows generated by a multiphase pump (turbulent intensity ≥40%, Re_λ = O(10^3), Re = O(10^5)), bubble coalescence dominates without additives, causing monotonic downstream growth in mean bubble diameter d_avg governed by the dissipation rate ε. Adding a minute amount (~0.01% CMC) of surfactant to produce a slight reduction in surface tension σ enhances breakup, slightly suppresses coalescence, and yields smaller, more uniformly sized bubbles, resulting in reduced d_avg and a narrower size distribution. Turbulence metrics (k, I, ε) remain unchanged within uncertainty, indicating the effect is interfacial. The authors conclude that combining extreme turbulence with this small σ reduction provides a simple, scalable, and tunable lever for controlling bubble sizes and intensifying mass transfer in industrial multiphase flows, noting that equivalent σ changes can be achieved with non-surface-active agents.

Significance. If the central observations hold and the interfacial mechanism is generalizable, this offers a low-complexity experimental approach to tuning micron-scale bubble-size distributions in high-turbulence environments without hydrodynamic alterations. The independent quantification of bubble statistics via high-speed imaging, back-lit shadowgraph, and particle shadow velocimetry (PSV), alongside turbulence parameters benchmarked to external metrics like Re_λ and ε, provides a solid experimental foundation. This could have practical value for mass-transfer intensification in industrial gas-liquid systems such as reactors and aeration processes.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the reduction in d_avg and narrowing of the bubble-size distribution 'arise entirely from interface rather than hydrodynamic changes' and that the minute σ reduction acts as a general 'interfacial tuning knob' is not fully supported by the reported experiments. Although the manuscript notes that 'the same change in surface tension can be achieved with non surface active agents,' no control experiment using a non-surface-active σ reducer is performed or reported. Surfactant-specific effects (dynamic surface tension, Marangoni stresses, altered interface mobility) could independently influence coalescence and breakup, leaving the assumption that the effect is purely σ-driven and therefore generalizable as the weakest link in the central claim. This is load-bearing for the proposed tunability and industrial applicability.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The orders-of-magnitude notation (e.g., Re_λ=𝒪(10^3)) is standard but would benefit from explicit reporting of the measured range or typical values of Re_λ and ε in the main text or a table for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recognizing the experimental foundation and potential practical value of the work. We address the single major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The assertion that the reduction in d_avg and narrowing of the bubble-size distribution 'arise entirely from interface rather than hydrodynamic changes' and that the minute σ reduction acts as a general 'interfacial tuning knob' is not fully supported by the reported experiments. Although the manuscript notes that 'the same change in surface tension can be achieved with non surface active agents,' no control experiment using a non-surface-active σ reducer is performed or reported. Surfactant-specific effects (dynamic surface tension, Marangoni stresses, altered interface mobility) could independently influence coalescence and breakup, leaving the assumption that the effect is purely σ-driven and therefore generalizable as the weakest link in the central claim. This is load-bearing for the proposed tunability and industrial applicability.

    Authors: We agree that the absence of a control experiment with a non-surface-active σ reducer is a genuine limitation and prevents a fully rigorous isolation of the mechanism to σ reduction alone. Our present support for an interfacial origin is indirect: turbulence metrics (k, I, ε) remain statistically unchanged within uncertainty, the additive concentration is very low (~0.01 % CMC), and the observed changes in bubble statistics are consistent with enhanced breakup and reduced coalescence. The manuscript already notes that equivalent σ changes are achievable with non-surface-active agents to indicate that the lever is not inherently surfactant-specific. To address the referee's point without overclaiming, we will revise the abstract and discussion to replace 'arise entirely from interface' with 'are consistent with an interfacial mechanism' and add an explicit caveat that surfactant-specific effects cannot be excluded without additional controls. This is a partial revision; new experiments lie outside the scope of the current rebuttal. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental measurements with no derivation chain or fitted predictions

full rationale

The manuscript is a purely experimental study that tests a hypothesis by generating decaying turbulent flow in a duct, measuring turbulence quantities (k, I, ε) and bubble statistics (d_avg and size distribution) via independent techniques (high-speed imaging, shadowgraph, PSV), and comparing the surfactant case to the baseline. No first-principles derivations, predictive equations, or parameter fits are presented; all quantities are directly observed and benchmarked against external dimensionless numbers (Re_λ, Re, ε) without self-referential closure. The note that equivalent σ reduction is possible with non-surface-active agents is an untested assertion but does not create circularity because it is not used as a load-bearing input to any calculation or prediction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions of fluid dynamics and interfacial physics with no invented entities or heavy fitting; the surfactant is treated as an external tuning parameter rather than a fitted variable.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Turbulent dissipation rate ε governs bubble coalescence in the absence of additives
    Invoked in the abstract to explain monotonic downstream growth in d_avg without surfactant.
  • domain assumption High-speed imaging and PSV accurately capture bubble statistics and turbulence metrics without significant bias
    Underlying the quantification of d_avg, size distribution, k, I, and ε.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5647 in / 1490 out tokens · 62191 ms · 2026-05-08T01:25:08.810947+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Computationalfluiddynamicsappliedtogas–liquid contactors

    Delnoij, E, Kuipers, JAM, van Swaaij, WPM and Akker, HEA. “Computationalfluiddynamicsappliedtogas–liquid contactors.”Chemical Engineering ScienceVol. 52 No. 21-22 (1997): pp. 3623–3638

    1997

  2. [2]

    On the hydrostatic limit for thin film flow with applications to thermosyphons

    Kumar, Vivek and Rahman, Muhammad Rizwanur. “On the hydrostatic limit for thin film flow with applications to thermosyphons.”Applied Thermal EngineeringVol. 245 (2024): p. 122869

    2024

  3. [3]

    Experimentalstudy on R1234yf/R134a mixture (R513a) as R134a replacement in heat pipes

    Kumar, Vivek, Kabir, Raihanul, Shannon, Zachary, Wagh- mare,PrashantRandFlynn,MorrisR.“Experimentalstudy on R1234yf/R134a mixture (R513a) as R134a replacement in heat pipes.”Journal of Enhanced Heat TransferVol. 32 No. 4 (2025)

    2025

  4. [4]

    Bub- bles, drops, and particles

    Clift, Roland, Grace, John R and Weber, Martin E. “Bub- bles, drops, and particles.” (2005)

    2005

  5. [5]

    Particle separation using modified Taylor’s flow

    Kumar, Vivek, Jain, Palak, Upadhyay, Ravi Kant, Bharath, KS and Waghmare, Prashant R. “Particle separation using modified Taylor’s flow.”Microfluidics and Nanofluidics Vol. 27 No. 10 (2023): p. 66

    2023

  6. [6]

    Breakup of an Air Bubble Injected into a Fully Developed Turbulent Flow. Part 1: Breakup Frequency

    Martínez-Bazán, C., Montañés, J. L. and Lasheras, J. C. “Breakup of an Air Bubble Injected into a Fully Developed Turbulent Flow. Part 1: Breakup Frequency.”Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 401 (1999): pp. 157–182

    1999

  7. [7]

    DescriptionofIn- teractionProcessesinAgitatedLiquid-LiquidDispersions

    Coulaloglou,C.A.andTavlarides,L.L. “DescriptionofIn- teractionProcessesinAgitatedLiquid-LiquidDispersions.” Chemical Engineering ScienceVol. 32 (1977): pp. 1289– 1297

    1977

  8. [8]

    Computationalstudyon jet break-up behavior of a high-density liquid jet entering a quiescent immiscible liquid pool

    Madanan,UmeshandPrajapati,S.“Computationalstudyon jet break-up behavior of a high-density liquid jet entering a quiescent immiscible liquid pool.”Proceedings of the 26thNational and 4th International ISHMT-ASTFE Heat and Mass Transfer Conference December 17-20, 2021, IIT Madras, Chennai-600036, Tamil Nadu, India. 2021. Begel House Inc

    2021

  9. [9]

    On the breakage of droplets in a tur- bulent flow

    Kolmogorov, A. N. “On the breakage of droplets in a tur- bulent flow.”Dokl. Akad. Nauk SSSRVol. 66 (1949): pp. 825–828

    1949

  10. [10]

    Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mech- anism of splitting in dispersion processes

    Hinze, J. O. “Fundamentals of the hydrodynamic mech- anism of splitting in dispersion processes.”AIChE JournalVol. 1 No. 3 (1955): pp. 289–295. DOI 10.1002/aic.690010303

    work page doi:10.1002/aic.690010303 1955

  11. [11]

    An investigation of the flow characteristics of multistage multiphase pumps

    Zhang,Jinya,Li,Yongjiang,Vafai,KandZhang,Yongxue. “An investigation of the flow characteristics of multistage multiphase pumps.”International Journal of Numerical Methods for Heat & Fluid FlowVol. 28 No. 3 (2018): pp. 763–784

    2018

  12. [12]

    Viscosity and dynamic surface tension measurement: A guideline for appropriate measurement

    Kumar, Vivek, Quintero, JSM, Baldygin, Aleksey, Molina, Paul, Willers, Thomas and Waghmare, Prashant R. “Viscosity and dynamic surface tension measurement: A guideline for appropriate measurement.”Journal of Colloid and Interface ScienceVol. 709 (2026): p. 139929. DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2026.139929. URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ar...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jcis.2026.139929 2026

  13. [13]

    Bubble Size Distribution in Decaying High Turbulence usingPopu- lationBalanceEquation

    Javadi, Ardalan, Kumar, Vivek and Aidun, Cyrus. “Bubble Size Distribution in Decaying High Turbulence usingPopu- lationBalanceEquation.”APSDivisionofFluidDynamics Meeting Abstracts: pp. R16–005. 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    Bubble-size distribu- tions and flow fields in bubble columns

    Lehr, F, Millies, M and Mewes, D. “Bubble-size distribu- tions and flow fields in bubble columns.”AIChE journal Vol. 48 No. 11 (2002): pp. 2426–2443

    2002

  15. [15]

    CFDinvestigationofbub- blebreakupandcoalescenceinarectangularpool-scrubbing column

    Li,ShiwangandLiao,Yixiang. “CFDinvestigationofbub- blebreakupandcoalescenceinarectangularpool-scrubbing column.”NuclearEngineeringandDesignVol.425(2024): p. 113342. DOI 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113342

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nucengdes.2024.113342 2024

  16. [16]

    Ef- fect of breakup and coalescence kernels on polydispersed bubbly flow in continuous casting mold

    Li,Yu,Liu,Zhongqiu,Xu,GuodongandLi,Baokuan. “Ef- fect of breakup and coalescence kernels on polydispersed bubbly flow in continuous casting mold.”International Journal of Multiphase FlowVol. 177 (2024): p. 104872. DOI 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104872

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2024.104872 2024

  17. [17]

    Deformation and breakup of bubbles and drops in turbulence

    Ni, Rui. “Deformation and breakup of bubbles and drops in turbulence.”Annual Review of Fluid MechanicsVol. 56 No. 1 (2024): pp. 319–347

    2024

  18. [18]

    Bubble breakage in pipeline flow

    Hesketh, RP, Etchells, AW and Russell, TB. “Bubble breakage in pipeline flow.”Chemical Engineering Science Vol. 42 No. 3 (1987): pp. 649–653. DOI 10.1016/0009- 2509(87)85016-6

    work page doi:10.1016/0009- 1987

  19. [19]

    A literature review on mechanismsandmodelsforthecoalescenceprocessoffluid particles

    Liao, Yixiang and Lucas, Dirk. “A literature review on mechanismsandmodelsforthecoalescenceprocessoffluid particles.”Chemical Engineering ScienceVol. 65 No. 10 (2010): pp. 2851–2864. DOI 10.1016/j.ces.2010.02.020

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ces.2010.02.020 2010

  20. [20]

    A coalescence and breakup module forimplementationinCFD-codes

    Hagesaether, Lars, Jakobsen, Hugo A, Hjarbo, Kai and Svendsen, Hallvard F. “A coalescence and breakup module forimplementationinCFD-codes.”ComputerAidedChem- ical Engineering. Vol. 8. Elsevier (2000): pp. 367–372

    2000

  21. [21]

    Turbulence in the liq- uid phase of a uniform bubbly air–water flow

    Lance, Michel and Bataille, Jean. “Turbulence in the liq- uid phase of a uniform bubbly air–water flow.”Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 222 (1991): pp. 95–118. DOI 10.1017/S0022112091001019

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112091001019 1991

  22. [22]

    Validation of bubble coalescence and breakup models in stirred gas- liquid dispersion

    Laakkonen, M., Alopaeus, V. and Aittamaa, J. “Validation of bubble coalescence and breakup models in stirred gas- liquid dispersion.”Chemical Engineering ScienceVol. 62 (2007): pp. 721–740. 7 Copyright©2026 by ASME

    2007

  23. [23]

    Large eddysimulationsofsidechannelpumpindifferentoperating conditions

    Javadi,Ardalan,Kumar,VivekandAidun,CyrusK. “Large eddysimulationsofsidechannelpumpindifferentoperating conditions.”Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid MechanicsVol. 20 No. 1 (2026): p. 2587723

    2026

  24. [24]

    Homogeneous swarm of high- Reynolds-number bubbles rising within a thin gap. Part 1. Bubble dynamics

    Bouche, Emmanuella, Roig, Véronique, Risso, Frédéric and Billet, Anne-Marie. “Homogeneous swarm of high- Reynolds-number bubbles rising within a thin gap. Part 1. Bubble dynamics.”Journal of fluid mechanicsVol. 704 (2012): pp. 211–231

    2012

  25. [25]

    Homogeneous swarm of high- Reynolds-number bubbles rising within a thin gap. Part 2. Liquid dynamics

    Bouche, Emmanuella, Roig, Véronique, Risso, Frédéric and Billet, Anne-Marie. “Homogeneous swarm of high- Reynolds-number bubbles rising within a thin gap. Part 2. Liquid dynamics.”Journal of fluid mechanicsVol. 758 (2014): pp. 508–521

    2014

  26. [26]

    Bubblecoalescencedynam- ics in a high-Reynolds number decaying turbulent flow

    Kumar, Vivek, Suchandra, Prasoon, Javadi, Ardalan, Jain, SuhasS.andAidun,CyrusK. “Bubblecoalescencedynam- ics in a high-Reynolds number decaying turbulent flow.” Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 1033 (2026): p. A6. DOI 10.1017/jfm.2026.11410

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2026.11410 2026

  27. [27]

    Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns

    Prince, M. J. and Blanch, H. W. “Bubble coalescence and break-up in air-sparged bubble columns.”AIChE JournalVol. 36 No. 10 (1990): pp. 1485–1499. DOI 10.1002/aic.690361008

    work page doi:10.1002/aic.690361008 1990

  28. [28]

    Experimental observations and modellingofsub-Hinzebubbleproductionbyturbulentbub- blebreak-up

    Ruth, Daniel J, Aiyer, Aditya K, Rivière, Aliénor, Perrard, Stéphane and Deike, Luc. “Experimental observations and modellingofsub-Hinzebubbleproductionbyturbulentbub- blebreak-up.”JournalofFluidMechanicsVol.951(2022): p. A32

    2022

  29. [29]

    Surfactant-induced suppression of bubble coalescence in turbulentductflowathighReynoldsnumbers

    Suchandra, Prasoon, Kumar, Vivek, Rom, Jason, Prajapati, Shivam,Javadi,Ardalan,Jain,SuhasSandAidun,CyrusK. “Surfactant-induced suppression of bubble coalescence in turbulentductflowathighReynoldsnumbers.”Divisionof Fluid Dynamics Annual Meeting 2025. 2025. APS

    2025

  30. [30]

    An improved CANNY edge detection algorithm

    Rong, Weibin, Li, Zhanjing, Zhang, Wei and Sun, Lin- ing. “An improved CANNY edge detection algorithm.” 2014 IEEE international conference on mechatronics and automation: pp. 577–582. 2014. IEEE

    2014

  31. [31]

    Water- shed: an image segmentation approach

    Seal, Arindrajit, Das, Arunava and Sen, Prasad. “Water- shed: an image segmentation approach.”International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technolo- giesVol. 6 No. 3 (2015): pp. 2295–2297

    2015

  32. [32]

    Deep learning-based automatedanduniversalbubbledetectionandmaskextrac- tionincomplextwo-phaseflows

    Kim, Yewon and Park, Hyungmin. “Deep learning-based automatedanduniversalbubbledetectionandmaskextrac- tionincomplextwo-phaseflows.”ScientificreportsVol.11 No. 1 (2021): p. 8940

    2021

  33. [33]

    Depth-Aware Ma- chine Learning Framework for Bubble Characterization in Two-Phase Flows

    Nayak, Chaitanya S, Mohammed, Faizaan, Kumar, Vivek, Prajapati, Shivam and Aidun, Cyrus. “Depth-Aware Ma- chine Learning Framework for Bubble Characterization in Two-Phase Flows.”arXiv preprint arXiv:2601.21175 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  34. [34]

    PIV with LED: ParticleShadowVelocimetry(PSV)

    Estevadeordal, Jordi and Goss, Larry. “PIV with LED: ParticleShadowVelocimetry(PSV).”43rdAIAAAerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit(2005)

    2005

  35. [35]

    A micro particle shadow ve- locimetry(𝜇PSV)techniquetomeasureflowsinmicrochan- nels

    Khodaparast, Sepideh, Borhani, Navid, Tagliabue, Giulia and Thome, John Richard. “A micro particle shadow ve- locimetry(𝜇PSV)techniquetomeasureflowsinmicrochan- nels.”Experiments in FluidsVol. 54 No. 1474 (2013)

    2013

  36. [36]

    Particle Shadow Velocimetry(PSV)inbubblyflows

    Hessenkemper, H. and Ziegenhein, T. “Particle Shadow Velocimetry(PSV)inbubblyflows.”InternationalJournal of Multiphase FlowVol. 106 (2018): pp. 268–279

    2018

  37. [37]

    Particle shadow velocimetry and its potential applica- tions, limitations and advantages vis-à-vis particle image velocimetry

    Jassal, GaureshRaj, Song, MaxwellandSchmidt, BryanE. “Particle shadow velocimetry and its potential applica- tions, limitations and advantages vis-à-vis particle image velocimetry.”Experiments in FluidsVol. 66 No. 1 (2025): p. 21

    2025

  38. [38]

    OpenPIV/openpiv-python: OpenPIV - Python (v0.22.2) with a new extended search PIV grid option (0.22.2)

    Liberzon,A.,Lasagna,D.,Aubert,M.,Bachant,P.,Käufer, T., jakirkham, Bauer, A., Vodenicharski, B., Dallas, C., Borg, J., tomerast and ranleu. “OpenPIV/openpiv-python: OpenPIV - Python (v0.22.2) with a new extended search PIV grid option (0.22.2).”ZenodoVol. 3930343 (2020)

    2020

  39. [39]

    Universal outlier detection for PIV data

    Westerweel, J. and Scarano, F. “Universal outlier detection for PIV data.”Experiments in fluidsVol. 39 (2005): pp. 1096–1100

    2005

  40. [40]

    PIV uncertainty quantification from corre- lation statistics

    Wieneke, B. “PIV uncertainty quantification from corre- lation statistics.”Measurement Science and Technology Vol. 26 (2015): p. 074002

    2015

  41. [41]

    PIV uncertainty prop- agation

    Sciacchitano, A. and Wieneke, B. “PIV uncertainty prop- agation.”Measurement Science and TechnologyVol. 27 (2016): p. 084006

    2016

  42. [42]

    Numerical simulation of low-Reynolds- numberturbulentflowthroughastraightsquareduct

    Gavrilakis, S. “Numerical simulation of low-Reynolds- numberturbulentflowthroughastraightsquareduct.”Jour- nalofFluidMechanicsVol.244(1992): pp.101–129. DOI 10.1017/S0022112092002982

    work page doi:10.1017/s0022112092002982 1992

  43. [43]

    Experimentsonlow-Reynolds-numberturbulentflow through a square duct

    Owolabi, Bayode E., Poole, Robert J. and Dennis, David J.C. “Experimentsonlow-Reynolds-numberturbulentflow through a square duct.”Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 798 (2016): pp. 398–410. DOI 10.1017/jfm.2016.314

    work page doi:10.1017/jfm.2016.314 2016

  44. [44]

    Locally ax- isymmetric turbulence

    George, William K and Hussein, Hussein J. “Locally ax- isymmetric turbulence.”Journal of Fluid MechanicsVol. 233 (1991): pp. 1–23

    1991

  45. [45]

    Accurate estimate of turbulent dissipation rate using PIV data

    Xu, Duo and Chen, Jun. “Accurate estimate of turbulent dissipation rate using PIV data.”Experimental Thermal and Fluid ScienceVol. 44 (2013): pp. 662–672

    2013

  46. [46]

    Spatial resolution of PIV for the measure- mentofturbulence

    Lavoie,P.,Avallone,G.,Gregorio,F.De,Romano,G.P.and Antonia, R. A. “Spatial resolution of PIV for the measure- mentofturbulence.”ExperimentsinFluidsVol.43(2007): pp. 39–51. DOI 10.1007/s00348-007-0319-x

    work page doi:10.1007/s00348-007-0319-x 2007

  47. [47]

    Dissipation Rate Estimationin aHighly TurbulentIsotropicFlow Using2D- PIV

    Verwey, Cameron and Birouk, Madjid. “Dissipation Rate Estimationin aHighly TurbulentIsotropicFlow Using2D- PIV.”Flow, Turbulence and CombustionVol. 109 (2022): pp. 647–665. DOI 10.1007/s10494-022-00343-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s10494-022-00343-9 2022

  48. [48]

    Friedlander, Sheldon K et al.Smoke, dust, and haze. Vol

  49. [49]

    Oxford university press New York (2000)

    2000

  50. [50]

    Bubble size in coalescence dominant regime of turbulent air–water flow through horizontal pipes

    Razzaque, Md Mamunur, Tomiyama, Akio and Kataoka, Ichiro. “Bubble size in coalescence dominant regime of turbulent air–water flow through horizontal pipes.”Inter- national Journal of Multiphase FlowVol. 29 No. 9 (2003): pp. 1451–1471. DOI 10.1016/S0301-9322(03)00090-9

    work page doi:10.1016/s0301-9322(03)00090-9 2003

  51. [51]

    Laminar- to-Turbulent Transition of Yield-Stress Fluids in Pipe and Channel Flows

    Prajapati, Shivam, Suchandra, Prasoon, Kumar, Vivek, Javadi, Ardalan, Jain, Suhas and Aidun, Cyrus. “Laminar- to-Turbulent Transition of Yield-Stress Fluids in Pipe and Channel Flows.”arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.11363(2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Laminar–Turbulent 8 Copyright©2026 by ASME TransitioninYield-StressFluidsinChannelandPipeFlow: ExperimentalandDNSStudy

    Prajapati, Shivam, Suchandra, Prasoon, Kumar, Vivek, Javadi, Ardalan and Aidun, Cyrus K. “Laminar–Turbulent 8 Copyright©2026 by ASME TransitioninYield-StressFluidsinChannelandPipeFlow: ExperimentalandDNSStudy.”DivisionofFluidDynamics Annual Meeting 2025. 2025. APS. 9 Copyright©2026 by ASME

    2026