pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24601 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 💻 cs.HC

Children's Online Safety Risks and Ethical Considerations in XR Games

Zinan Zhang , Xinning Gui , Yubo Kou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:05 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.HC
keywords XR gameschildren online safetyethical frameworksdesign patternsimmersive technologyvirtual reality riskschild-centered design
0
0 comments X

The pith

XR game designs create online safety risks for children that standard ethical frameworks fail to address.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines how XR game design elements generate specific online safety risks for children by reviewing player forums, developer forums, and direct interviews with child players. It documents harmful design patterns, the ways developers jointly produce risky game concepts, and children's reported encounters with issues like disturbing content or blurred real-world judgment. A reader would care because XR technologies are expanding rapidly into children's play and social spaces, where unaddressed immersion and social dynamics could amplify harm beyond what happens in conventional games. The authors conclude that existing ethics overlook these immersive qualities and therefore call for a shift to approaches that place children's developmental needs at the center of design decisions.

Core claim

Through analysis of player forums, game developer forums, and interviews with child players, the paper identifies harmful XR design patterns that lead to online safety risks, explores collaborative developer practices that generate and implement risky ideas, and documents children's firsthand experiences, concluding that ethical frameworks must adopt a child-centered, design-aware stance to handle the immersive and socially dynamic character of XR games.

What carries the argument

Qualitative analysis of player and developer forums combined with child interviews to surface harmful XR design patterns and support advocacy for child-centered ethical design.

If this is right

  • Platforms and developers must incorporate children's developmental stages when creating or reviewing XR game features.
  • Policymakers should draft XR-specific guidelines that account for immersion effects on judgment and social interaction.
  • Cross-sector collaboration between researchers, developers, and child advocates becomes necessary to implement safer design practices.
  • Future XR environments for children will require ongoing inclusion of direct child feedback rather than adult-only ethical review.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same child-centered lens could be tested in educational or social XR applications to check whether risks transfer beyond games.
  • Developers might need concrete checklists or prototyping tools derived from the identified patterns to avoid risky ideas early in production.
  • Similar qualitative methods could reveal whether non-XR immersive platforms face comparable gaps in current ethics.

Load-bearing premise

The selected forum posts and child interviews provide representative evidence of widespread design-induced risks, and a child-centered approach will reliably reduce those risks.

What would settle it

A broad survey or observational study of XR game users showing no elevated safety incidents or that existing ethical frameworks already prevent the reported harms would undermine the need for a new child-centered approach.

read the original abstract

Emerging extended reality technologies are reshaping how children play, learn, and socialize. Yet, they also present serious safety risks. Gaming, a primary form of entertainment for children, is also one of the key applications of XR. While XR platforms offer immersive and engaging gaming experiences, recent news has highlighted safety concerns such as car accidents, lower judgment for real-world situations, and exposure to disturbing content like virtual rape. This research examines how XR game design may lead to online safety risks for children. Through analysis of player forums, game developer forums, and interviews with child players, we identify harmful XR design patterns, explore how developers collaboratively generate and implement risky game ideas, and document children's firsthand experiences of online safety risks. Existing ethical frameworks often fail to address the immersive and socially dynamic nature of XR games. We advocate for a child-centered, design-aware approach to ethical considerations in XR games, urging platforms and policymakers to prioritize children's developmental needs. Our work aims to help shape safer, more inclusive XR environments through research and cross-sector collaboration.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines how XR game design contributes to online safety risks for children through analysis of player forums, developer forums, and interviews with child players. It identifies harmful design patterns, explores how developers generate risky ideas, documents children's experiences, and argues that existing ethical frameworks fail to address the immersive and socially dynamic aspects of XR games. The authors advocate for a child-centered, design-aware approach to ethical considerations.

Significance. If the findings on design-induced risks are robust and representative, the paper could significantly influence the development of safer XR environments for children by highlighting gaps in current ethical frameworks and proposing targeted improvements. This is particularly relevant given the rapid adoption of XR technologies in gaming. The work's emphasis on cross-sector collaboration is a strength.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The abstract and introduction describe the use of player forums, developer forums, and child interviews to identify risks, but provide no details on the total number of posts or interviews analyzed, sampling frames, recruitment methods, demographics, or measures of coding reliability. This absence undermines the ability to evaluate whether the documented risks (such as immersion-related judgment issues or exposure to disturbing content) are prevalent and design-induced rather than anecdotal, directly affecting the support for the central claim about framework failures.
  2. [Discussion] The advocacy for a child-centered approach assumes that identifying risks will lead to effective mitigation without any pilot validation, outcome measures, or testing of the proposed framework. This makes the recommendation speculative and weakens the practical implications.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract mentions specific risks like 'car accidents' and 'virtual rape' without context or references to sources; adding brief citations or clarifications would improve clarity.
  2. [Introduction] Some terminology around 'XR games' could be defined more precisely early on to aid readers unfamiliar with the subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive review. The comments highlight important areas for strengthening the methodological transparency and the practical implications of our recommendations. We address each point below and outline specific revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] The abstract and introduction describe the use of player forums, developer forums, and child interviews to identify risks, but provide no details on the total number of posts or interviews analyzed, sampling frames, recruitment methods, demographics, or measures of coding reliability. This absence undermines the ability to evaluate whether the documented risks (such as immersion-related judgment issues or exposure to disturbing content) are prevalent and design-induced rather than anecdotal, directly affecting the support for the central claim about framework failures.

    Authors: We agree that greater methodological detail is necessary to allow readers to assess the prevalence and design linkage of the identified risks. While the full manuscript (Section 3) outlines the data sources and thematic analysis approach, we did not include quantitative sample sizes, sampling frames, recruitment procedures, demographics, or inter-coder reliability statistics in the abstract or introduction. We will revise the methods section to report: the total number of forum posts analyzed from player and developer communities, the number of child interviews conducted (with age range and consent procedures), recruitment channels (e.g., parental consent via schools and XR gaming communities), participant demographics where available, and coding reliability measures such as percentage agreement or Cohen’s kappa. These additions will strengthen the evidential basis for our claims that the risks are tied to XR-specific design features rather than isolated anecdotes. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Discussion] The advocacy for a child-centered approach assumes that identifying risks will lead to effective mitigation without any pilot validation, outcome measures, or testing of the proposed framework. This makes the recommendation speculative and weakens the practical implications.

    Authors: We accept that the current discussion section presents the child-centered, design-aware framework as a logical next step without empirical validation of its effectiveness. The manuscript’s core contribution is the identification of XR-specific risks and gaps in existing ethical frameworks through qualitative evidence; we do not claim to have tested mitigation strategies. To address the concern, we will add an explicit limitations subsection and a future-work paragraph that acknowledges the absence of pilot testing, outcome measures, or implementation trials. We will also moderate the language around the framework to frame it as a proposed direction requiring cross-sector collaboration and empirical evaluation rather than an immediately actionable solution. This preserves the paper’s exploratory nature while clarifying the speculative character of the recommendations. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: qualitative claims rest on external data sources

full rationale

The paper contains no derivations, equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-citations. Its central claims derive from described analysis of player forums, developer forums, and child interviews rather than reducing to inputs by construction. This is a standard non-quantitative HCI paper whose logic is self-contained against its stated qualitative sources.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim depends on the assumption that forum posts and child interviews reliably capture design practices and lived risks; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Forum discussions and interviews with children accurately reflect real design decisions and safety experiences in XR games
    The study treats these sources as primary evidence without describing validation or triangulation steps in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5475 in / 1210 out tokens · 27982 ms · 2026-05-08T02:05:27.141742+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 13 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Paola Araiza-Alba, Therese Keane, and Jordy Kaufman. 2022. Are we ready for virtual reality in K–12 classrooms? Technology, Pedagogy and Education 31, 4 (August 2022), 471–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2022.2033307

    work page doi:10.1080/1475939x.2022.2033307 2022

  2. [2]

    Backlinko Team. 2023. Roblox User and Growth Stats You Need to Know in

    2023

  3. [3]

    Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://backlinko.com/roblox - users

    Backlinko. Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://backlinko.com/roblox - users

    2025

  4. [4]

    Hundreds

    Rhiannon Bevan. 2024. Roblox Reportedly Receives “Hundreds” Of Child Safety Reports Every Day. TheGamer. Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://www.thegamer.com/roblox-child-safety-hundreds-of-reports-a-day/

    2024

  5. [5]

    Dana Blanco, Rachel M Roberts, Anne Gannoni, and Steve Cook. 2024. Assessment and treatment of mental health conditions in children and adolescents: A systematic scoping review of how virtual reality environments have been used. Clin Child Psychol Psychiatry 29, 3 (July 2024), 1070 –1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/13591045231204082

    work page doi:10.1177/13591045231204082 2024

  6. [6]

    Russell Brandom. 2021. Roblox is struggling to moderate re -creations of mass shootings. The Verge (August 2021). Retrieved May 5, 2023 from https://www.theverge.com/2021/8/17/22628624/roblox-moderation-trust-and- safety-terrorist-content-christchurch

    2021

  7. [7]

    Jiaxun Cao, Anupam Das, and Pardis Emami -Naeini. 2024. Understanding parents’ perceptions and practices toward children’s security and privacy in virtual reality. In 2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP) , 2024. IEEE, 1554 –1572. Retrieved April 4, 2025 from https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/10646753/?casa_token=vi -A3- w4ZOEAAAAA:...

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Thomas D Grace, Christie Abel, and Katie Salen. 2023. Child -Centered Design in the Digital World: Investigating the Implications of the Age -Appropriate Design Code for Interactive Digital Media. In Proceedings of the 22nd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference (IDC ’23 ), June 19, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, U...

    work page doi:10.1145/3585088.3589370 2023

  9. [9]

    Roman Grunis. 2018. Pros and Cons of Learning to Drive in a Simulator. Medium. Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://medium.com/@rmgrunis/pros - and-cons-of-learning-to-drive-in-a-simulator-a73b7e90c4f5

    2018

  10. [10]

    Kristan Harris and Denise Reid. 2005. The Influence of Virtual Reality Play on Children’S Motivation. Can J Occup Ther 72, 1 (February 2005), 21 –29. https://doi.org/10.1177/000841740507200107

    work page doi:10.1177/000841740507200107 2005

  11. [11]

    Juan Pablo Hourcade, Summer Schmuecker, Delaney Norris, and Flannery Hope Currin. 2024. Understanding Adult Stakeholder Perspectives on the Ethics of Extended Reality Technologies with a Focus on Young Children and Children in Rural Areas. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference, June 17, 2024. ACM, Delft Netherlan...

    2024

  12. [12]

    https://doi.org/10.1145/3628516.3655811

    work page doi:10.1145/3628516.3655811

  13. [13]

    Qiao Jin, Saba Kawas, Stuti Arora, Ye Yuan, and Svetlana Yarosh. 2024. Is Your Family Ready for VR? Ethical Concerns and Considerations in Children’s VR Usage. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual ACM Interaction Design and Children Conference , June 17, 2024. ACM, Delft Netherlands, 436 –454. https://doi.org/10.1145/3628516.3655804

    work page doi:10.1145/3628516.3655804 2024

  14. [14]

    Sean Keach. 2018. Roblox kids’ game is a haven for twisted Jihadi, Nazi and KKK racist roleplay. The Sun (July 2018). Retrieved May 5, 2023 from https://www.thesun.co.uk/tech/6710158/roblox-game-racist-jihad-nazi-kkk- racism-twin-towers-children/

    work page arXiv 2018

  15. [15]

    Yubo Kou and Xinning Gui. 2023. Harmful Design in the Metaverse and How to Mitigate it: A Case Study of User -Generated Virtual Worlds on Roblox. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference (DIS ’23), July 10, 2023. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 175–188

    2023

  16. [16]

    Mom horrified to see her 7 -year-old’s Roblox character ‘gang-raped’ in popular online game - National | Globalnews.ca

    Marilisaraccoglobal. Mom horrified to see her 7 -year-old’s Roblox character ‘gang-raped’ in popular online game - National | Globalnews.ca. Global News. Retrieved March 16, 2023 from https://globalnews.ca/news/4316449/roblox - gang-rape-7-year-old-girl/

    work page arXiv 2023

  17. [17]

    well over

    Jay Peters. 2023. Roblox on Quest VR headsets has gotten “well over” 1 million downloads. The Verge . Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://www.theverge.com/2023/8/2/23817317/roblox-quest-vr-headsets-ceo-1- million-downloads

    2023

  18. [18]

    Anastasiya Publishing. 2020. Roblox Moderation Flaws. Medium. Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://medium.com/@AnastasiyaPublishing/roblox - moderation-flaws-d8acbd38863c

    2020

  19. [19]

    Maria Roussou, Martin Oliver, and Mel Slater. 2006. The virtual playground: an educational virtual reality environment for evaluating interactivity and conceptual learning. Virtual Reality 10, 3 –4 (November 2006), 227 –240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10055-006-0035-5

    work page doi:10.1007/s10055-006-0035-5 2006

  20. [20]

    Dangerous Playgrounds: Child Players’ Encounters with Design -Mediated Risks on User Generated Game Platforms and Their Safety Practices

    Zinan Zhang, Xinning Gui, Junnan Yu, Sunhye Bai, and Yubo Kou. Dangerous Playgrounds: Child Players’ Encounters with Design -Mediated Risks on User Generated Game Platforms and Their Safety Practices. In Proceedings of the 25th ACM Conference on Interaction Design and Children ,

  21. [21]

    Zinan Zhang, Sam Moradzadeh, Xinning Gui, and Yubo Kou. 2024. Harmful Design in User -Generated Games and its Ethical and Governance Challenges: An Investigation of Design Co -Ideation of Game Creators on Roblox. Proc. ACM Hum. -Comput. Interact. 8, CHI PLAY (October 2024), 1 –31. https://doi.org/10.1145/3677076

    work page doi:10.1145/3677076 2024

  22. [22]

    Pokémon GO

    Pokémon GO. Pokémon GO . Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://pokemongolive.com/

    2025

  23. [23]

    PlayStation

    PlayStation Move motion controller. PlayStation. Retrieved April 4, 2025 from https://www.playstation.com/en-us/accessories/playstation-move-motion- controller/

    2025

  24. [24]

    Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://www.logitechg.com/en-us/products/driving.html

    Sim Racing & Gaming Wheel Gear | Logitech G Canada. Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://www.logitechg.com/en-us/products/driving.html

    2025

  25. [25]

    Rec Room

    Creative Directory. Rec Room . Retrieved September 9, 2024 from https://recroom.com/creative

    2024

  26. [26]

    Roblox Support

    Setting up VR for Roblox. Roblox Support . Retrieved April 4, 2025 from https://en.help.roblox.com/hc/en-us/articles/208260046-Setting-up-VR-for- Roblox

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://www.newscientist.com/article/2154881 - did-pokemon-go-really-kill-250-people-in-traffic-accidents/

    Did Pokémon Go really kill 250 people in traffic accidents? | New Scientist. Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://www.newscientist.com/article/2154881 - did-pokemon-go-really-kill-250-people-in-traffic-accidents/

    work page arXiv 2025

  28. [28]

    Roblox Corporate

    Home - Roblox. Roblox Corporate . Retrieved April 4, 2025 from https://corp.roblox.com/

    2025

  29. [29]

    Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://www.takeaway-reality.com/post/roblox-demographics-statistics

    Roblox Demographics Statistics 2025. Retrieved April 6, 2025 from https://www.takeaway-reality.com/post/roblox-demographics-statistics

    2025

  30. [30]

    Retrieved April 3, 2025 from https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/

    UNICEF Innocenti | Innocenti Global Office of Research and Foresight. Retrieved April 3, 2025 from https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/

    2025