pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24606 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.SY· eess.SY

Recognition: unknown

Hybrid A*-Based Reverse Path-Planning of a Vehicle with Trailer System

Xincheng Cao , Haochong Chen , Bilin Aksun-Guvenc , Levent Guvenc , Brian Link , Peter J Richmond , Dokyung Yim , Shihong Fan
show 1 more author
John Harber
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 03:07 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY
keywords reverse path planningvehicle-trailer systemHybrid A*collision avoidancejackknife preventionparking maneuvernonholonomic planning
0
0 comments X

The pith

A modified Hybrid A* algorithm generates collision-free reverse paths for vehicles with trailers by using configuration-dependent steering limits to avoid jackknifing.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a path planner for the challenging task of backing a car and trailer into a parking spot while dodging other vehicles. Human drivers find this difficult because the trailer responds counter-intuitively and small steering mistakes can cause the two units to fold together. The authors adapt the Hybrid A* search so that the allowed steering range shrinks or expands according to the current angle between car and trailer, and they add explicit checks that keep the entire system clear of obstacles. A reader would care because reliable automated reverse parking with trailers would remove one of the most error-prone maneuvers in everyday driving.

Core claim

The authors present a Hybrid A*-based planner that incorporates the full kinematic model of a vehicle-trailer system together with steering-angle limits that change with instantaneous configuration to prevent jackknife states, while simultaneously enforcing collision avoidance against static obstacles and other moving vehicles during reverse maneuvers in a parking environment.

What carries the argument

Modified Hybrid A* search that replaces fixed steering bounds with configuration-dependent limits derived from the vehicle-trailer kinematics and adds collision checking inside the node expansion step.

If this is right

  • The planner produces feasible reverse trajectories that respect both nonholonomic constraints and jackknife avoidance for the combined system.
  • Collision avoidance is performed as an integral part of the search rather than a post-processing step.
  • Steering limits are updated at every configuration, allowing tighter maneuvers than a single fixed limit would permit.
  • Simulation results show the method succeeds in parking scenarios containing multiple surrounding vehicles.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same adaptive-bound technique could be applied to forward-only planning or to systems with more than one trailer.
  • Real-time replanning would become feasible if the search is seeded with the previous solution when obstacles move.
  • The planner's output could serve as a reference trajectory for a low-level controller that tracks the path while respecting actuator rates.

Load-bearing premise

The kinematic model of the vehicle-trailer system is accurate enough for planning and the configuration-varying steering limits will prevent jackknifing in all real maneuvers the planner outputs.

What would settle it

A closed-loop test in which the physical vehicle-trailer system executes the generated path yet still reaches a jackknife angle or contacts an obstacle.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24606 by Bilin Aksun-Guvenc, Brian Link, Dokyung Yim, Haochong Chen, John Harber, Levent Guvenc, Peter J Richmond, Shihong Fan, Xincheng Cao.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Kinematic vehicle-trailer model with one trailer. TABLE I PARAMETERS OF KINEMATIC VEHICLE-TRAILER MODEL Model Parameter Explanation 𝐿𝐿 Wheelbase of the tractor vehicle (passenger car, SUV or pickup truck) 𝐿𝐿𝐹𝐹 Distance between vehicle center of gravity G and front axle center 𝐿𝐿𝑅𝑅 Distance between vehicle center of gravity G and rear axle center 𝐿𝐿𝐻𝐻 Distance between vehicle rear axle center and trailer hi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Inverse kinematics simulation study model structure. 𝜓𝜓2 ̇ = 𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝐿𝐿𝑇𝑇 tan(𝛿𝛿𝑇𝑇) (7) 𝜓𝜓1 ̇ = 𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 𝐿𝐿𝐻𝐻 [sin(Δ𝜓𝜓) − cos(Δ𝜓𝜓)tan(𝛿𝛿𝑇𝑇)] (8) 𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇 = 𝑉𝑉𝑅𝑅 cos(Δ𝜓𝜓)+sin(Δ𝜓𝜓)tan(𝛿𝛿𝑇𝑇) (9) 𝛿𝛿𝑓𝑓 = atan � 𝐿𝐿 𝐿𝐿𝐻𝐻 ∙ sin(Δ𝜓𝜓)−cos(Δ𝜓𝜓) tan(𝛿𝛿𝑇𝑇) cos(Δ𝜓𝜓)+sin(Δ𝜓𝜓) tan(𝛿𝛿𝑇𝑇) � (10) where Equations (7) and (8) represent the ‘desired’ yaw rates of the trailer and the vehicle, respectively, given a ‘virtual’ steer angle 𝛿𝛿𝑇… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: displays the result of the simulation. It can be observed that the vehicle steering inputs generated by the inverse kinematics calculation can accurately re-create the ‘desired’ 𝛿𝛿𝑇𝑇 profile view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Typical scenario of vehicle-trailer system reverse parking. The flowchart of the modified Hybrid A* algorithm is provided in view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Modified Hybrid A* algorithm flowchart. Details of the partial paths, including system states at the terminal nodes and their corresponding cost values, are stored in a priority queue. This queue is ordered by cost values so that the node with the lowest cost can easily be located for motion primitive branch expansion. It should be noted that once the new admissible nodes are added to the queue at the end … view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Example of cost function design. motion with maximum trailer orientation to the right; 3) backward motion with intermediate trailer orientation (between maximum left and maximum right). All three branches feature the same trailer unit reverse speed 𝑉𝑉𝑇𝑇, which coupled with the same simulation duration, ensures the terminal nodes of these branches being comparable to each other using the cost function menti… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Example of a binary occupancy map. Once the motion primitives are generated, collision checks will be applied to each candidate branch to determine if these kinematically feasible segments can avoid collisions with obstacles in the parking environment. To facilitate this function, a binary occupancy map should first be constructed to define the regions occupied by obstacles as well as unoccupied regions ac… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Vehicle-trailer system body reconstruction. Once the binary occupancy map has been established, the next step is to reconstruct the vehicle-trailer system centerlines. Since the motion primitives already contain vehicle states (𝑋𝑋𝑅𝑅, 𝑌𝑌𝑅𝑅, 𝜓𝜓1) and trailer states (𝑋𝑋𝑇𝑇, 𝑌𝑌𝑇𝑇, 𝜓𝜓2), the coordinates of additional points along the system centerlines can be calculated using the transport formula view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Binary occupancy map construction: (a) Original uninflated map; (b) Inflated map regions; (c) Modified inflated map view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Reverse parking maneuvering of a vehicle with trailer system is a difficult task to complete for human drivers due to the multi-body nature of the system and the unintuitive controls required to orientate the trailer properly. The problem is complicated with the presence of other vehicles that the trailer and its connected vehicle must avoid during the reverse parking maneuver. While path planning methods in reverse motion for vehicles with trailers exist, there is a lack of results that also offer collision avoidance as part of the algorithm. This paper hence proposes a modified Hybrid A*-based algorithm that can accommodate the vehicle-trailer system as well as collision avoidance considerations with the other vehicles and obstacles in the parking environment. One of the novelties of this proposed approach is its adaptability to the vehicle with trailer system, where limits of usable steering input that prevent the occurrence of jackknife incidents vary with respect to system configuration. The other contribution is the addition of the collision avoidance functionality which the standard Hybrid A* algorithm lacks. The method is developed and presented first, followed by simulation case studies to demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed approach.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a modified Hybrid A*-based algorithm for reverse path planning of a vehicle with trailer, extending the standard method to handle the multi-body kinematics, configuration-dependent steering limits to avoid jackknifing, and explicit collision avoidance with obstacles and other vehicles in a parking scenario. The approach is described algorithmically and evaluated via simulation case studies.

Significance. If the central claims are supported by quantitative evidence, the work would offer a practical extension of Hybrid A* to trailer systems, addressing a real-world challenge in autonomous parking where standard planners lack collision handling and adaptive limits. The configuration-varying steering bounds represent a targeted contribution, though the absence of metrics and dynamic validation currently limits assessed impact.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'simulation case studies demonstrate the efficacy' is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the provided description includes no quantitative metrics (e.g., success rate, path length, computation time), error analysis, or baseline comparisons against standard Hybrid A* or other trailer planners.
  2. [Simulation case studies] Simulation case studies: the kinematic bicycle-trailer model with instantaneous steering bounds (derived to keep |hitch angle| below jackknife threshold) is assumed to produce executable paths, but no dynamic rollout or sensitivity analysis is reported to test whether inertial effects, tire slip, or actuator lag would violate the assumed limits.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Method] The state-space representation for the vehicle-trailer system (including hitch angle) should be explicitly defined with equations early in the method section to improve clarity for readers unfamiliar with multi-body kinematics.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating the changes we will make to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the statement that 'simulation case studies demonstrate the efficacy' is load-bearing for the central claim, yet the provided description includes no quantitative metrics (e.g., success rate, path length, computation time), error analysis, or baseline comparisons against standard Hybrid A* or other trailer planners.

    Authors: We agree that quantitative metrics are needed to support the efficacy claim. The simulation case studies in the manuscript consist of multiple parking scenarios with different initial configurations and obstacle layouts. In the revised manuscript we will report concrete metrics extracted from these simulations, including average path length, planning computation time, success rate (collision-free, jackknife-free goal reaching), and a comparison against a baseline Hybrid A* implementation adapted to the trailer kinematics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Simulation case studies] Simulation case studies: the kinematic bicycle-trailer model with instantaneous steering bounds (derived to keep |hitch angle| below jackknife threshold) is assumed to produce executable paths, but no dynamic rollout or sensitivity analysis is reported to test whether inertial effects, tire slip, or actuator lag would violate the assumed limits.

    Authors: The work presents a kinematic planner intended for low-speed parking maneuvers, where the kinematic bicycle-trailer model with configuration-dependent steering bounds is the standard modeling choice. We acknowledge that inertial effects and actuator dynamics are relevant for real-world execution. In the revision we will add an explicit discussion of the kinematic assumptions, their validity range at low speeds, and the potential for future dynamic validation. However, performing new dynamic rollouts or sensitivity analyses would require a separate modeling and simulation effort that lies outside the scope of the current path-planning contribution; therefore no such simulations will be added. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: standard algorithmic extension with direct kinematic constraints

full rationale

The paper presents a modification of the well-known Hybrid A* planner to incorporate a vehicle-trailer kinematic model and configuration-dependent steering bounds derived from the hitch-angle jackknife limit. These bounds are computed directly from the instantaneous state using the kinematic equations; they are not fitted parameters, not renamed predictions, and not justified by self-citation chains. Collision checking is added as a standard feasibility test inside the search. No equation or result is shown to be equivalent to its own inputs by construction. The central claims rest on simulation demonstrations rather than tautological reductions, satisfying the criteria for a self-contained algorithmic contribution.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard non-holonomic vehicle kinematics and the established Hybrid A* search framework; no new free parameters, invented physical entities, or ad-hoc axioms are introduced in the abstract description.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The vehicle-trailer system obeys standard non-holonomic kinematic constraints.
    Invoked when extending the planner state to include trailer angle.
  • domain assumption Steering-angle limits can be computed from instantaneous configuration to prevent jackknifing.
    Central to the stated novelty of adaptability to the trailer system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5526 in / 1337 out tokens · 64479 ms · 2026-05-08T03:07:10.648678+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

43 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Autonomous Cars: Research Results, Issues, and Future Challenges,

    R. Hussain and S. Zeadally, “Autonomous Cars: Research Results, Issues, and Future Challenges,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 1275–1313, 2019, doi: 10.1109/COMST.2018.2869360

    work page doi:10.1109/comst.2018.2869360 2019

  2. [2]

    SmartShuttle: a unified, scalable and replicable approach to connected and automated driving in a smart city,

    S. Y. Gelbal, B. A. Guvenc, and L. Guvenc, “SmartShuttle: a unified, scalable and replicable approach to connected and automated driving in a smart city,” in Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop on Science of Smart City Operations and Platforms Engineering , in SCOPE ’17. New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, Apr. 2017, pp. 57–6...

    work page doi:10.1145/3063386.3063761 2017

  3. [3]

    Localization and Perception for Control and Decision -Making of a Low -Speed Autonomous Shuttle in a Campus Pilot Deployment,

    B. Wen, S. Y. Gelbal, B. A. Guvenc, and L. Guvenc, “Localization and Perception for Control and Decision -Making of a Low -Speed Autonomous Shuttle in a Campus Pilot Deployment,” SAE Int. J. Connect. Autom. Veh., vol. 1, no. 2, Art. no. 12- 01-02–0003, Nov. 2018, doi: 10.4271/12-01-02-0003

    work page doi:10.4271/12-01-02-0003 2018

  4. [4]

    A Review of Motion Planning for Highway Autonomous Driving,

    L. Claussmann, M. Revilloud, D. Gruyer, and S. Glaser, “A Review of Motion Planning for Highway Autonomous Driving,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. , vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1826 –1848, May 2020, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2019.2913998

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2019.2913998 2020

  5. [5]

    Connected and Autonomous Vehicles,

    L. Guvenc, B. A. Guvenc, and M. T. Emirler, “Connected and Autonomous Vehicles,” in Internet of Things and Data Analytics Handbook, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017, pp. 581– 595. doi: 10.1002/9781119173601.ch35

    work page doi:10.1002/9781119173601.ch35 2017

  6. [6]

    Development of an Advisory System for Parking a Car with Trailer,

    X. Cao et al. , “Development of an Advisory System for Parking a Car with Trailer,” SAE International, Warrendale, PA, SAE Technical Paper 2025-01-8035, Apr. 2025. doi: 10.4271/2025-01-8035

    work page doi:10.4271/2025-01-8035 2025

  7. [7]

    Reversing the General One-Trailer System: Asymptotic Curvature Stabilization and Path Tracking,

    M. Werling, P. Reinisch, M. Heidingsfeld, and K. Gresser, “Reversing the General One-Trailer System: Asymptotic Curvature Stabilization and Path Tracking,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. , vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 627–636, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2013.2285602

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2013.2285602 2014

  8. [8]

    Autonomous Parking for Articulated Vehicles,

    R. Kusumakar, K. Kural, A. Tomar, and B. Pyman, “Autonomous Parking for Articulated Vehicles,” 2017. doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30533.76009

    work page doi:10.13140/rg.2.2.30533.76009 2017

  9. [9]

    Autonomous Parallel Parking of a Scaled Tractor Semi-Trailer,

    Adityen Sudhakaran, “Autonomous Parallel Parking of a Scaled Tractor Semi-Trailer,” Thesis, Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands, 2018

    2018

  10. [10]

    Flatness, motion planning and trailer systems,

    P. Rouchon, M. Fliess, J. Levine, and P. Martin, “Flatness, motion planning and trailer systems,” in Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control , Dec. 1993, pp. 2700– 2705 vol.3. doi: 10.1109/CDC.1993.325686

    work page doi:10.1109/cdc.1993.325686 1993

  11. [11]

    Path following bi- directional controller for articulated vehicles,

    A. Tomar et al. , “Path following bi- directional controller for articulated vehicles,” Proceedings of the HVTT15, 2018

    2018

  12. [12]

    Driver assistance system for backward maneuvers in passive multi-trailer vehicles,

    J. Morales, A. Mandow, J. L. Martinez, J. L. Martínez, and A. J. García - Cerezo, “Driver assistance system for backward maneuvers in passive multi-trailer vehicles,” in 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems , Oct. 2012, pp. 4853 –4858. doi: 10.1109/IROS.2012.6385799

    work page doi:10.1109/iros.2012.6385799 2012

  13. [13]

    A Novel Cascade Path Planning Algorithm for Autonomous Truck- Trailer Parking,

    A. C. Manav and I. Lazoglu , “A Novel Cascade Path Planning Algorithm for Autonomous Truck- Trailer Parking,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. , vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 6821– 6835, July 2022, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2021.3062701

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3062701 2022

  14. [14]

    An optimisation -based path planner for truck-trailer systems with driving direction changes,

    P. Zips, M. Böck, and A. Kugi, “An optimisation -based path planner for truck-trailer systems with driving direction changes,” in 2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) , May 2015, pp. 630–636. doi: 10.1109/ICRA.2015.7139245

    work page doi:10.1109/icra.2015.7139245 2015

  15. [15]

    Optimal collision free path planning for an autonomous articulated vehicle with two trailers,

    A. Mohamed, J. Ren, H. Lang, and M. El -Gindy, “Optimal collision free path planning for an autonomous articulated vehicle with two trailers,” in 2017 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology (ICIT), Mar. 2017, pp. 860–865. doi: 10.1109/ICIT.2017.7915472

    work page doi:10.1109/icit.2017.7915472 2017

  16. [16]

    A path planning and path- following control framework for a general 2 - trailer with a car -like tractor,

    O. Ljungqvist, N. Evestedt, D. Axehill, M. Cirillo, and H. Pettersson, “A path planning and path- following control framework for a general 2 - trailer with a car -like tractor,” J. Field Robot. , vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1345– 1377, 2019, doi: 10.1002/rob.21908

    work page doi:10.1002/rob.21908 2019

  17. [17]

    Motion Planning for Parking a Truck and Trailer System,

    K. Kvarnfors, “Motion Planning for Parking a Truck and Trailer System,” Thesis, School of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden, 2019

    2019

  18. [18]

    Minimum Parking Maneuvers for Articulated Vehicles with One- Axle Trailers,

    D. Zobel, E. Balcerak, and T. Weidenfeller, “Minimum Parking Maneuvers for Articulated Vehicles with One- Axle Trailers,” in Robotics and Vision 2006 9th International Conference on Control, Automation, Dec. 2006, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1109/ICARCV.2006.345243

    work page doi:10.1109/icarcv.2006.345243 2006

  19. [19]

    Exact motion planning for tractor -trailer robots,

    P. Svestka and J. Vleugels, “Exact motion planning for tractor -trailer robots,” in Proceedings of 1995 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, May 1995, pp. 2445– 2450 vol.3. doi: 10.1109/ROBOT.1995.525626

    work page doi:10.1109/robot.1995.525626 1995

  20. [20]

    A Path Planning Approach for Tractor - Trailer System based on Semi-Supervised Learning,

    X. Zhang, J. Eck, and F. Lotz, “A Path Planning Approach for Tractor - Trailer System based on Semi-Supervised Learning,” in 2022 IEEE 25th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) , Oct. 2022, pp. 3549–3555. doi: 10.1109/ITSC55140.2022.9922552

    work page doi:10.1109/itsc55140.2022.9922552 2022

  21. [21]

    Research on Cooperative Trajectory Planning Algorithm Based on Tractor -Trailer Wheeled Robot,

    G. Lei and Y. Zheng, “Research on Cooperative Trajectory Planning Algorithm Based on Tractor -Trailer Wheeled Robot,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 64209–64221, 2022, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3062392

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2021.3062392 2022

  22. [22]

    Nonlinear MPC on Parallel Parking for Autonomous Vehicles Under State- Dependent Switching,

    H. Zhao, H. Yang, Z. Wang and Y. Xia, "Nonlinear MPC on Parallel Parking for Autonomous Vehicles Under State- Dependent Switching," in IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering , vol. 22, pp. 6377-6387, 2025, doi: 10.1109/TASE.2024.3443848

    work page doi:10.1109/tase.2024.3443848 2025

  23. [23]

    Hierarchical Control of Trajectory Planning and Trajectory Tracking for Autonomous Parallel Parking,

    D. Qiu, D. Qiu, B. Wu, M. Gu and M. Zhu, "Hierarchical Control of Trajectory Planning and Trajectory Tracking for Autonomous Parallel Parking," in IEEE Access , vol. 9, pp. 94845- 94861, 2021, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3093930

    work page doi:10.1109/access.2021.3093930 2021

  24. [24]

    Stability and Performance Robustness Analysis of Repetitive Control Systems Using Structured Singular Values ,

    L. Guvenc, "Stability and Performance Robustness Analysis of Repetitive Control Systems Using Structured Singular Values ," ASME Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control, Vol. 118, pp. 593-597, 1996

    1996

  25. [25]

    Robust Repetitive Controller for Fast AFM Imaging,

    S. Necipoglu, S. A. Cebeci, Y. E. Has, L. Guvenc and C. Basdogan, "Robust Repetitive Controller for Fast AFM Imaging," in IEEE Transactions on Nanotechnology , vol. 10, no. 5, pp. 1074- 1082, Sept. 2011, doi: 10.1109/TNANO.2011.2106797

    work page doi:10.1109/tnano.2011.2106797 2011

  26. [26]

    Guvenc, B

    L. Guvenc, B. A ksun-Guvenc, B. Demirel, and M. T. Emirler, Control of Mechatronic Systems . London, U.K.: The Institution of Engineering and Technology (IET), 2017

    2017

  27. [27]

    Development and Evaluation of Path and Speed Profile Planning and Tracking Control for an Autonomous Shuttle Using a Realistic, Virtual Simulation Environment,

    X. Li, S. Zhu, B. Aksun -Guvenc, and L. Guvenc, "Development and Evaluation of Path and Speed Profile Planning and Tracking Control for an Autonomous Shuttle Using a Realistic, Virtual Simulation Environment," Journal of Intelligent & Robotic Systems , vol. 101, no. 2, pp. 1–23, Feb. 2021, Art. no. 42

    2021

  28. [28]

    Stability of Local Trajectory Planning for Level- 2+ Semi- Autonomous Driving without Absolute Localization,

    S. Zhu, J. Wang, Y. Yang, and B. Aksun- Guvenc, "Stability of Local Trajectory Planning for Level- 2+ Semi- Autonomous Driving without Absolute Localization," Electronics, vol. 13, no. 19, Art. no. 3808, Sep. 2024

    2024

  29. [29]

    Hierarchical Planning for Autonomous Parking in Dynamic Environments,

    Y. Wang, E. Hansen and H. Ahn, "Hierarchical Planning for Autonomous Parking in Dynamic Environments," in IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology , vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 1386- 1398, July 2024, doi: 10.1109/TCST.2024.3367468

    work page doi:10.1109/tcst.2024.3367468 2024

  30. [30]

    Laser Scanners for Driver -Assistance Systems in Intelligent Vehicles [Applications of Control],

    S. Velupillai and L. Guvenc, "Laser Scanners for Driver -Assistance Systems in Intelligent Vehicles [Applications of Control]," in IEEE Control Systems Magazine , vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 17- 19, April 2009, doi: 10.1109/MSP.2008.931716

    work page doi:10.1109/msp.2008.931716 2009

  31. [31]

    Multiview Fusion Automotive Radar SLAM,

    Z. Zeng, X. Dang, Y. Li and X. Liang, "Multiview Fusion Automotive Radar SLAM," in IEEE Sensors Journal , vol. 23, no. 19, pp. 23158- 23168, 1 Oct.1, 2023, doi: 10.1109/JSEN.2023.3307399

    work page doi:10.1109/jsen.2023.3307399 2023

  32. [32]

    High- Fidelity Ultrasonic Radar In -the-Loop Accelerated Test for Automatic Parking Systems,

    B. Zhu, X. Cao, P. Zhang, J. Zhao, J. Han and R. Tang, "High- Fidelity Ultrasonic Radar In -the-Loop Accelerated Test for Automatic Parking Systems," in IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems , vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 17055- 17067, Oct. 2025, doi: 10.1109/TITS.2025.3574505

    work page doi:10.1109/tits.2025.3574505 2025

  33. [33]

    Ultrasonic and VCSEL sensor fusion for distance measurement in parking assistance,

    F. -D. Sandru, V. -I. Ungureanu and I. Silea, "Ultrasonic and VCSEL sensor fusion for distance measurement in parking assistance," 2023 24th International Conference on Control Systems and Computer Science (CSCS) , Bucharest, Romania, 2023, pp. 35- 40, doi: 10.1109/CSCS59211.2023.00015

    work page doi:10.1109/cscs59211.2023.00015 2023

  34. [34]

    Pre -Deployment Testing of Low Speed, Urban Road Autonomous Driving in a Simulated Environment,

    X. Li, A. C. A. Doss, B. A. Guvenc, and L. Guvenc, "Pre -Deployment Testing of Low Speed, Urban Road Autonomous Driving in a Simulated Environment," SAE Int. J. Adv. & Curr. Prac. in Mobility, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 3301–3311, Apr. 2020

    2020

  35. [35]

    Vehicle-in-Virtual-Environment (VVE) Method for Autonomous Driving System Development, Evaluation and Demonstration,

    X. Cao, H. Chen, S. Y. Gelbal, B. Aksun -Guvenc, and L. Guvenc, "Vehicle-in-Virtual-Environment (VVE) Method for Autonomous Driving System Development, Evaluation and Demonstration," Sensors, vol. 23, no. 11, Art. no. 5088, May 2023

    2023

  36. [36]

    Vehicle in Virtual Environment (VVE) Method of Autonomous Driving Function Evaluation and Development,

    S. Y. Gelbal, B. A. Guvenc, and L. Guvenc, "Vehicle in Virtual Environment (VVE) Method of Autonomous Driving Function Evaluation and Development," SAE Technical Paper 2023- 01-0820,

    2023

  37. [37]

    Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/2023-01-0820

    [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/2023-01-0820

    work page doi:10.4271/2023-01-0820 2023

  38. [38]

    Vehicle- in- Virtual-Environment (VVE) Method for Developing and Evaluating VRU Safety of Connected and Autonomous Driving with Focus on Bicyclist Safety,

    H. Chen, X. Cao, B. Aksun -Guvenc, and L. Guvenc, "Vehicle- in- Virtual-Environment (VVE) Method for Developing and Evaluating VRU Safety of Connected and Autonomous Driving with Focus on Bicyclist Safety," Safety21 National University Transportation Center, Carnegie Mellon University , Pittsburgh, PA, Final Rep. 484, Jul. 2025. [Online]. Available: https...

    2025

  39. [39]

    Developing a Vehicle- in-Virtual-Environment (VVE) Based Autonomous Driving Function Development and Evaluation Pipeline for Vulnerable Road User Safety,

    H. Chen, X. Cao, L. Guvenc, and B. A. Guvenc, "Developing a Vehicle- in-Virtual-Environment (VVE) Based Autonomous Driving Function Development and Evaluation Pipeline for Vulnerable Road User Safety," SAE Technical Paper 2025- 01-8061, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/2025-01-8061

    work page doi:10.4271/2025-01-8061 2025

  40. [40]

    H. Chen, F. Zhang, and B. Aksun- Guvenc, "Collision Avoidance in Autonomous Vehicles Using the Control Lyapunov Function– Control Barrier Function –Quadratic Programming Approach with Deep Reinforcement Learning Decision -Making," Electronics, vol. 14, no. 3, Art. no. 557, Jan. 2025

    2025

  41. [41]

    Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Collision Avoidance of Automated Driving Agent,

    H. Chen and B. Aksun Guvenc, "Deep Reinforcement Learning Based Collision Avoidance of Automated Driving Agent," SAE Technical Paper 2024- 01-2556, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.4271/2024-01-2556

    work page doi:10.4271/2024-01-2556 2024

  42. [42]

    Chen and B

    H. Chen and B. Aksun- Guvenc, "Hierarchical Deep Reinforcement Learning -Based Path Planning with Underlying High-Order Control Lyapunov Function— Control Barrier Function—Quadratic Programming Collision Avoidance," Electronics, vol. 14, no. 14, Art. no. 2776, Jul. 2025

    2025

  43. [43]

    Deep - Reinforcement-Learning-Based Collision Avoidance of Autonomous Driving System for Vulnerable Road User Safety,

    H. Chen, X. Cao, L. Guvenc, and B. Aksun -Guvenc, "Deep - Reinforcement-Learning-Based Collision Avoidance of Autonomous Driving System for Vulnerable Road User Safety," Electronics, vol. 13, no. 10, Art. no. 1952, May 2024

    1952