pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.24910 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-27 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Digital Twins in Coronary Artery Disease: A Mathematical Roadmap

Alessandro Veneziani , Annalisa Quaini , Marco Tezzele , Omer San , Traian Iliescu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 02:08 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords digital twinscoronary artery diseasewall shear stressdata assimilationprobabilistic graphical modelsmathematical modelingpersonalized medicineinfarct prevention
0
0 comments X

The pith

A bidirectional framework of data assimilation and probabilistic models personalizes wall shear stress estimates to enable digital twins for coronary artery disease.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sketches a mathematical approach to building digital twins for coronary artery disease by fusing patient-specific data with fluid-flow models. Central to the proposal is the accurate estimation of wall shear stress, a quantity linked to plaque formation and infarct risk. The authors describe two-way communication: data assimilation updates the model with new measurements, while probabilistic graphical models fill in gaps and quantify uncertainty. If the steps work, clinicians could receive real-time, individualized predictions to guide prevention rather than relying on population averages. The text frames this as a roadmap of required mathematical pieces rather than a finished software system.

Core claim

The central claim is that data assimilation combined with probabilistic graphical models supplies the bidirectional link needed to personalize and synthesize wall shear stress from diagnostic devices, thereby constructing a digital twin capable of supporting decisions that reduce the risk of myocardial infarction.

What carries the argument

Bidirectional communication between the digital twin and patient data, achieved through data assimilation for updating models with measurements and probabilistic graphical models for uncertainty handling and data synthesis, with wall shear stress as the focal output quantity.

If this is right

  • Clinicians could obtain personalized risk assessments for coronary artery disease based on individual artery geometry and flow conditions.
  • Treatment planning would incorporate synthesized estimates where direct measurements are unavailable or invasive.
  • The same framework would allow continuous updating of the twin as new imaging or sensor data arrive.
  • Prevention strategies could shift from generic guidelines toward model-driven thresholds for intervention.
  • The roadmap identifies concrete mathematical tasks whose completion would make such systems feasible.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar assimilation-plus-graphical-model pipelines could be tested on other cardiovascular flows, such as aortic aneurysms or cerebral vessels.
  • Computational cost of the bidirectional updates would need to drop to seconds or minutes before routine bedside use.
  • The approach might extend to multi-organ digital twins if the same uncertainty-handling machinery proves transferable.
  • Success would require large, anonymized patient cohorts to train the probabilistic components without overfitting.

Load-bearing premise

That data assimilation and probabilistic graphical models can be combined to produce accurate, patient-specific wall shear stress estimates from standard diagnostic inputs.

What would settle it

A controlled clinical validation trial in which the digital twin's wall shear stress predictions show no statistical correlation with observed plaque progression or infarct events.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.24910 by Alessandro Veneziani, Annalisa Quaini, Marco Tezzele, Omer San, Traian Iliescu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison between a healthy coronary and a coronary affected by CAD. Image created view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Information flow of a DT with bidirectional feedback loop. view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Example of a PGM with highlighted P2D and D2P couplings in the first time step. view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Block-diagram for the estimation of WSS through DA. view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A coronary artery reconstructed from intravascular imaging. The plaque is evident at view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Lumen of a patient-specific coronary artery with the footprint of the stent (left) and view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The combination of data and models, enhanced by AI methodologies, leads to the paradigm called Digital Twins. This concept is expected to bring unprecedented support to personalized medicine. The combination of mathematical and numerical models with diagnostic devices that provide patient-specific knowledge in a bidirectional framework can be a formidable decision support for clinicians. In this paper, we consider some mathematical aspects of constructing a Digital Twin to prevent and treat Coronary Artery Disease. The keywords for the bidirectional communication between twins in our system are (i) Data Assimilation and (ii) Probabilistic Graphic Models. In particular, a quantity of paramount interest in the evaluation and prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease is the Wall Shear Stress, i.e., the tangential component of normal stress on the arterial wall. By considering steps for the personalization and the synthesis of Wall Shear Stress estimation, we propose a mathematical roadmap for constructing a Digital Twin system that could help prevent infarcts, one of the most lethal diseases in the world.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a high-level conceptual roadmap for constructing Digital Twins in Coronary Artery Disease (CAD). It advocates a bidirectional framework that combines data assimilation (DA) with probabilistic graphical models (PGM) to personalize patient-specific data from diagnostic devices and synthesize estimates of wall shear stress (WSS), with the stated aim of providing clinical decision support to help prevent myocardial infarctions.

Significance. If implemented, the proposed integration of DA and PGM could advance patient-specific hemodynamic modeling for CAD, where WSS is a key prognostic quantity. The bidirectional aspect addresses uncertainty in clinical measurements and could support real-time personalization. As a purely conceptual outline without derivations or examples, however, the work primarily serves to highlight research directions rather than deliver validated methods or predictions.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Proposal] Abstract and main proposal: the central claim of a 'mathematical roadmap' is not supported by any concrete mathematical content. No equations, algorithms, pseudocode, or even high-level flow diagrams are supplied for the DA-PGM bidirectional loop, the personalization step, or the WSS synthesis step, leaving the proposal at the level of aspirational description rather than a usable roadmap.
  2. [WSS estimation steps] Section describing WSS estimation: the personalization and synthesis steps are presented qualitatively without any discussion of numerical stability, error propagation, convergence criteria for the assimilation-synthesis cycle, or identifiability of parameters in the PGM, all of which are load-bearing for a numerical-analysis contribution.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'Probabilistic Graphic Models' appears in the abstract and should be corrected to the standard term 'Probabilistic Graphical Models'.
  2. [Introduction / Related work] The manuscript would benefit from explicit citations to existing DA or PGM applications in cardiovascular modeling to clarify the incremental contribution of the proposed combination.
  3. [Overall presentation] Figure or schematic illustrating the bidirectional DA-PGM flow is absent; adding one would greatly improve clarity of the roadmap.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments, which help clarify the intended scope of our work as a high-level mathematical roadmap. We address each major comment below and outline planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Proposal] Abstract and main proposal: the central claim of a 'mathematical roadmap' is not supported by any concrete mathematical content. No equations, algorithms, pseudocode, or even high-level flow diagrams are supplied for the DA-PGM bidirectional loop, the personalization step, or the WSS synthesis step, leaving the proposal at the level of aspirational description rather than a usable roadmap.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript is deliberately conceptual and does not derive new equations or provide pseudocode, as its goal is to synthesize existing techniques from data assimilation and probabilistic graphical models into a bidirectional framework for digital twins in CAD. The absence of detailed algorithms reflects the roadmap nature of the paper rather than an oversight. To make the proposal more concrete and usable, we will add a high-level flow diagram in the revised version that illustrates the DA-PGM bidirectional loop, the personalization of patient-specific data from diagnostic devices, and the synthesis of wall shear stress estimates. This visual aid will better convey the structure without expanding the work into a full methodological paper. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [WSS estimation steps] Section describing WSS estimation: the personalization and synthesis steps are presented qualitatively without any discussion of numerical stability, error propagation, convergence criteria for the assimilation-synthesis cycle, or identifiability of parameters in the PGM, all of which are load-bearing for a numerical-analysis contribution.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the descriptions of personalization and synthesis remain qualitative. As a roadmap paper, the focus was on outlining the overall integration strategy rather than performing a full numerical analysis. In the revision, we will expand these sections with a concise discussion of relevant considerations, including references to numerical stability issues in data assimilation, error propagation in probabilistic models, convergence of iterative assimilation-synthesis cycles, and parameter identifiability within PGMs. These additions will draw on established literature in the field and better align with the expectations for a numerical-analysis contribution while preserving the high-level roadmap character. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely conceptual roadmap

full rationale

The paper is a forward-looking conceptual proposal outlining high-level steps for a bidirectional data assimilation and probabilistic graphical models framework to personalize and synthesize wall shear stress estimates. It contains no equations, derivations, numerical predictions, fitted parameters, or theorems that could reduce by construction to the paper's own inputs. No self-citations are invoked as load-bearing uniqueness results, and the central claim is simply the act of proposing the roadmap itself rather than asserting validated outputs. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The abstract relies on domain assumptions from cardiovascular modeling and numerical methods without specifying free parameters or new entities; the roadmap invokes standard techniques whose validity is taken from prior literature.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Wall Shear Stress is a quantity of paramount interest in the evaluation and prognosis of Coronary Artery Disease
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as central to CAD assessment.
  • domain assumption The combination of mathematical and numerical models with diagnostic devices can form a bidirectional framework for personalized medicine
    Core premise of the digital twin paradigm presented in the abstract.
invented entities (1)
  • Digital Twin system for CAD no independent evidence
    purpose: Bidirectional decision support tool integrating data assimilation and probabilistic models for WSS estimation and infarct prevention
    Introduced as the target paradigm combining data and models, but no independent evidence or falsifiable prediction is provided beyond the proposal itself.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5471 in / 1422 out tokens · 35069 ms · 2026-05-08T02:08:36.538823+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

127 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    [Accessed 10-03-2025]

    Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR): Definition and Calculation — my.clevelandclinic.org.https: //my.clevelandclinic.org/health/diagnostics/23556-fractional-flow-reserve. [Accessed 10-03-2025]

    2025

  2. [2]

    N. M. Alexandrov, J. E. Dennis Jr, R. M. Lewis, and V. Torczon. A trust-region framework for managing the use of approximation models in optimization.Structural optimization, 15(1):16–23, 1998

    1998

  3. [3]

    P. F. Antonietti, L. B. da Veiga, G. Manzini, et al.The virtual element method and its applications, volume 31. Springer, 2022

    2022

  4. [4]

    M. Asch, M. Bocquet, and M. Nodet.Data Assimilation. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia, PA, 2016.doi:10.1137/1.9781611974546

    work page doi:10.1137/1.9781611974546 2016

  5. [5]

    Azouani, E

    A. Azouani, E. Olson, and E. S. Titi. Continuous data assimilation using general interpolant observables.Journal of Nonlinear Science, 24(2):277–304, 2014

    2014

  6. [6]

    Ballarin, A

    F. Ballarin, A. Manzoni, A. Quarteroni, and G. Rozza. Supremizer stabilization of POD– Galerkin approximation of parametrized steady incompressible Navier–Stokes equations.In- ternational Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 102:1136–1161, 2015

    2015

  7. [7]

    Barone, M

    A. Barone, M. G. Carlino, A. Gizzi, S. Perotto, and A. Veneziani. Efficient estimation of car- diac conductivities: A proper generalized decomposition approach.Journal of Computational Physics, 423:109810, 2020

    2020

  8. [8]

    Benner, W

    P. Benner, W. Schilders, S. Grivet-Talocia, A. Quarteroni, G. Rozza, and L. Miguel Silveira. Model Order Reduction. Volume 2: Snapshot-Based Methods and Algorithms. De Gruyter, 2020

    2020

  9. [9]

    Benner, W

    P. Benner, W. Schilders, S. Grivet-Talocia, A. Quarteroni, G. Rozza, and L. Miguel Silveira. Model order reduction. Volume 3: Applications. De Gruyter, 2020. 15

    2020

  10. [10]

    https://doi.org/https ://doi.org/10.1515/9783110498967

    P. Benner, W. Schilders, S. Grivet-Talocia, A. Quarteroni, G. Rozza, and L. Miguel Silveira. Model Order Reduction. Volume 1: System-and Data-Driven Methods and Algorithms. De Gruyter, Berlin, Boston, 2021.doi:doi:10.1515/9783110498967

    work page doi:10.1515/9783110498967 2021

  11. [11]

    Bertagna and A

    L. Bertagna and A. Veneziani. A model reduction approach for the variational estimation of vascular compliance by solving an inverse fluid–structure interaction problem.Inverse Problems, 30(5):055006, 2014

    2014

  12. [12]

    Bertoglio, P

    C. Bertoglio, P. Moireau, and J.-F. Gerbeau. Sequential parameter estimation for fluid– structure problems: application to hemodynamics.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Biomedical Engineering, 28(4):434–455, 2012.doi:10.1002/cnm.1476

    work page doi:10.1002/cnm.1476 2012

  13. [13]

    Bl¨ omker, K

    D. Bl¨ omker, K. Law, A. M. Stuart, and K. C. Zygalakis. Accuracy and stability of the continuous-time 3DVAR filter for the Navier–Stokes equation.Nonlinearity, 26(8):2193, 2013

    2013

  14. [14]

    Bruynseels, F

    K. Bruynseels, F. Santoni de Sio, and J. Van den Hoven. Digital twins in health care: ethical implications of an emerging engineering paradigm.Frontiers in genetics, 9:31, 2018

    2018

  15. [15]

    S. Cai, Z. Mao, Z. Wang, M. Yin, and G. E. Karniadakis. Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A review.Acta Mechanica Sinica, 37(12):1727–1738, 2021

    2021

  16. [16]

    Y. Cao, J. Zhu, I. M. Navon, and Z. Luo. A reduced-order approach to four-dimensional variational data assimilation using proper orthogonal decomposition.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 53(10):1571–1583, 2007

    2007

  17. [17]

    Cartis, J

    C. Cartis, J. Fiala, B. Marteau, and L. Roberts. Improving the Flexibility and Robustness of Model-based Derivative-free Optimization Solvers.ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software (TOMS), 45(3):1–41, 2019.doi:10.1145/3338517

    work page doi:10.1145/3338517 2019

  18. [18]

    Cartis and L

    C. Cartis and L. Roberts. A derivative-free Gauss–Newton method.Mathematical Program- ming Computation, 11:631–674, 2019.doi:10.1007/s12532-019-00161-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s12532-019-00161-7 2019

  19. [19]

    Cartis, L

    C. Cartis, L. Roberts, and O. Sheridan-Methven. Escaping local minima with local derivative- free methods: a numerical investigation.Optimization, 71(8):2343–2373, 2022

    2022

  20. [20]

    Leading causes of death.https://www.cdc

    CDC/National Center for Health Statistics. Leading causes of death.https://www.cdc. gov/nchs/fastats/leading-causes-of-death.htm. [Accessed 10-03-2025]

    2025

  21. [21]

    J. Chen, C. Meng, Y. Gao, and Y. Liu. Multi-fidelity neural optimization machine for Digital Twins.Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 65(12):340, 2022

    2022

  22. [22]

    R. T. Chen, Y. Rubanova, J. Bettencourt, and D. K. Duvenaud. Neural ordinary differential equations.Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018

    2018

  23. [23]

    Coorey, G

    G. Coorey, G. A. Figtree, D. F. Fletcher, V. J. Snelson, S. T. Vernon, D. Winlaw, S. M. Grieve, A. McEwan, J. Y. H. Yang, P. Qian, et al. The health digital twin to tackle car- diovascular disease—a review of an emerging interdisciplinary field.npj Digital Medicine, 5(1):126, 2022

    2022

  24. [24]

    Corral-Acero, F

    J. Corral-Acero, F. Margara, M. Marciniak, C. Rodero, F. Loncaric, Y. Feng, A. Gilbert, J. F. Fernandes, H. A. Bukhari, A. Wajdan, et al. The ‘digital twin’ to enable the vision of precision cardiology.European Heart Journal, 41(48):4556–4564, 2020

    2020

  25. [25]

    2025.doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412

    D. Cotoarb˘ a, D. Straub, and I. F. Smith. Probabilistic digital twins for geotechnical de- sign and construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.09432, 2024.doi:10.48550/arXiv.2412. 09432

    work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.2412 2024

  26. [26]

    Cuomo, V

    S. Cuomo, V. S. Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, M. Raissi, and F. Piccialli. Scientific machine learning through physics–informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next. Journal of Scientific Computing, 92(3):88, 2022

    2022

  27. [27]

    G. Cybenko. Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function.Mathematics of control, signals and systems, 2(4):303–314, 1989. 16

    1989

  28. [28]

    S. De, J. Britton, M. Reynolds, R. Skinner, K. Jansen, and A. Doostan. On transfer learning of neural networks using bi-fidelity data for uncertainty propagation.International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 10(6), 2020

    2020

  29. [29]

    De Bruyne, T

    B. De Bruyne, T. Baudhuin, J. A. Melin, N. Pijls, S. U. Sys, A. Bol, W. J. Paulus, G. R. Heyndrickx, and W. Wijns. Coronary flow reserve calculated from pressure measurements in humans. validation with positron emission tomography.Circulation, 89(3):1013–1022, 1994

    1994

  30. [30]

    DeCaria, T

    V. DeCaria, T. Iliescu, W. Layton, M. McLaughlin, and M. Schneier. An artificial compres- sion reduced order model.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 58(1):565–589, 2020

    2020

  31. [31]

    D’Elia, L

    M. D’Elia, L. Mirabella, T. Passerini, M. Perego, M. Piccinelli, C. Vergara, and A. Veneziani. Applications of variational data assimilation in computational hemodynamics, pages 363–394. Springer, 2012

    2012

  32. [32]

    D’Elia, M

    M. D’Elia, M. Perego, and A. Veneziani. A variational data assimilation procedure for the incompressible Navier-Stokes equations in hemodynamics.Journal of Scientific Computing, 52:340–359, 2012

    2012

  33. [33]

    D’Elia and A

    M. D’Elia and A. Veneziani. Uncertainty quantification for data assimilation in a steadyin- compressible Navier-Stokes problem.ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Anal- ysis, 47(4):1037–1057, 2013

    2013

  34. [34]

    Donoghue and M

    G. Donoghue and M. Yano. A multi-fidelity ensemble Kalman filter with hyperre- duced reduced-order models.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 398:115282, 2022

    2022

  35. [35]

    Dziopa, K

    K. Dziopa, K. Lekadir, P. van der Harst, and F. W. Asselbergs. Digital twins: Reimagin- ing the future of cardiovascular risk prediction and personalized care.Hellenic Journal of Cardiology, 81:4–8, 2024.doi:10.1016/j.hjc.2024.06.001

    work page doi:10.1016/j.hjc.2024.06.001 2024

  36. [36]

    W. F. Fearon, B. De Bruyne, and N. H. Pijls. Fractional Flow Reserve in Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 68(11):1192–1194, 2016.doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.713

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2016.07.713 2016

  37. [37]

    Formaggia, J.-F

    L. Formaggia, J.-F. Gerbeau, F. Nobile, and A. Quarteroni. Numerical Treatment of De- fective Boundary Conditions for the Navier–Stokes Equations.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 40(1):376–401, 2002.doi:10.1137/S003614290038296X

    work page doi:10.1137/s003614290038296x 2002

  38. [38]

    Formaggia, F

    L. Formaggia, F. Nobile, A. Quarteroni, and A. Veneziani. Multiscale modelling of the circulatory system: a preliminary analysis.Computing and visualization in science, 2:75–83, 1999

    1999

  39. [39]

    Formaggia, A

    L. Formaggia, A. Quarteroni, and A. Veneziani.Cardiovascular Mathematics: Modeling and simulation of the circulatory system, volume 1. Springer Science & Business Media, 2010

    2010

  40. [40]

    Formaggia, A

    L. Formaggia, A. Veneziani, and C. Vergara. A New Approach to Numerical Solution of Defective Boundary Value Problems in Incompressible Fluid Dynamics.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 46(6):2769–2794, 2008.doi:10.1137/060672005

    work page doi:10.1137/060672005 2008

  41. [41]

    Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineer- ing 198(27-29), 2099–2110 (2009)

    L. Formaggia, A. Veneziani, and C. Vergara. Flow rate boundary problems for an incompress- ible fluid in deformable domains: Formulations and solution methods.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 199(9-12):677–688, 2010.doi:10.1016/j.cma.2009. 10.017

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2009 2010

  42. [42]

    A. I. Forrester, A. S´ obester, and A. J. Keane. Multi-fidelity optimization via surrogate modelling.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 463(2088):3251–3269, 2007.doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1900

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2007.1900 2088

  43. [43]

    H. Gao, M. J. Zahr, and J.-X. Wang. Physics-informed graph neural Galerkin networks: A unified framework for solving PDE-governed forward and inverse problems.Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 390:114502, 2022

    2022

  44. [44]

    Girfoglio, A

    M. Girfoglio, A. Quaini, and G. Rozza. A POD-Galerkin reduced order model for a LES filtering approach.Journal of Computational Physics, 436:110260, 2021. 17

    2021

  45. [45]

    Girfoglio, A

    M. Girfoglio, A. Quaini, and G. Rozza. A hybrid projection/data-driven reduced order model for the Navier-Stokes equations with nonlinear filtering stabilization.Journal of Computa- tional Physics, 486:112127, 2023

    2023

  46. [46]

    A. A. Gorodetsky, J. D. Jakeman, G. Geraci, and M. S. Eldred. MFNets: Multi-fidelity data- driven networks for Bayesian learning and prediction.International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 10(6), 2020

    2020

  47. [47]

    G¨ otberg, E

    M. G¨ otberg, E. H. Christiansen, I. J. Gudmundsdottir, L. Sandhall, M. Danielewicz, L. Jakobsen, S.-E. Olsson, P. ¨Ohagen, H. Olsson, E. Omerovic, et al. Instantaneous wave- free ratio versus fractional flow reserve to guide pci.New England Journal of Medicine, 376(19):1813–1823, 2017

    2017

  48. [48]

    T. G. Grossmann, U. J. Komorowska, J. Latz, and C.-B. Sch¨ onlieb. Can physics-informed neural networks beat the finite element method?IMA Journal of Applied Mathematics, 89(1):143–174, 2024

    2024

  49. [49]

    Theory of Deep Learning

    I. G¨ uhring, M. Raslan, and G. Kutyniok. Expressivity of deep neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.04759, 34, 2020

    work page arXiv 2007

  50. [50]

    M. D. Gunzburger.Perspectives in Flow Control and Optimization. Advances in De- sign and Control. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2003.doi:10.1137/ 1.9780898718720

    2003

  51. [51]

    Henao-Garcia, M

    S. Henao-Garcia, M. Kapteyn, K. E. Willcox, M. Tezzele, M. Castroviejo-Fernandez, T. Kim, M. Ambrosino, I. Kolmanovsky, H. Basu, P. Jirwankar, and R. Sanfelice. Digital-Twin- Enabled Multi-Spacecraft On-Orbit Operations. InAIAA SCITECH 2025 Forum. American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 2025.doi:10.2514/6.2025-1432

    work page doi:10.2514/6.2025-1432 2025

  52. [52]

    W. D. Henshaw, H.-O. Kreiss, and J. Ystr¨ om. Numerical Experiments on the Interaction Between the Large- and Small-Scale Motions of the Navier-Stokes Equations.Multiscale Modeling & Simulation, 1(1):119–149, 2003.doi:10.1137/S1540345902406240

    work page doi:10.1137/s1540345902406240 2003

  53. [53]

    J. S. Hesthaven, G. Rozza, and B. Stamm.Certified Reduced Basis Methods for Parametrized Partial Differential Equations, volume 590. Springer, 2016

    2016

  54. [54]

    J. G. Heywood, R. Rannacher, and S. Turek. Artificial boundaries and flux and pressure con- ditions for the incompressible Navier–Stokes equations.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 22(5):325–352, 1996

    1996

  55. [55]

    [Accessed 10-03-2025]

    Heartflow - Decisive Coronary Care.https://www.heartflow.com/. [Accessed 10-03-2025]

    2025

  56. [56]

    Holmes, J

    P. Holmes, J. L. Lumley, G. Berkooz, and C. W. Rowley.Turbulence, Coherent Structures, Dynamical Systems and Symmetry. Cambridge, second edition, 2012

    2012

  57. [57]

    K. Hornik. Approximation capabilities of multilayer feedforward networks.Neural networks, 4(2):251–257, 1991

    1991

  58. [58]

    Ivagnes, M

    A. Ivagnes, M. Strazzullo, M. Girfoglio, T. Iliescu, and G. Rozza. Data-driven optimization for the evolve-filter-relax regularization of convection-dominated flows.International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 126(9):e70042, 2025

    2025

  59. [59]

    M. I. Jordan.Learning in graphical models. MIT press, 1999

    1999

  60. [60]

    Kaercher, S

    M. Kaercher, S. Boyaval, M. A. Grepl, and K. Veroy. Reduced basis approximation and a posteriori error bounds for 4D-Var data assimilation.Optimization and Engineering, pages 1–33, 2018

    2018

  61. [61]

    M. G. Kapteyn, J. V. Pretorius, and K. E. Willcox. A probabilistic graphical model founda- tion for enabling predictive digital twins at scale.Nature Computational Science, 1(5):337– 347, 2021.doi:10.1038/s43588-021-00069-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s43588-021-00069-0 2021

  62. [62]

    G. E. Karniadakis, I. G. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, and L. Yang. Physics- informed machine learning.Nature Reviews Physics, 3(6):422–440, 2021. 18

    2021

  63. [63]

    M. C. Kennedy and A. O’Hagan. Predicting the Output from a Complex Computer Code When Fast Approximations Are Available.Biometrika, 87(1):1–13, 2000

    2000

  64. [64]

    Kim and P

    J. Kim and P. Moin. Application of a fractional-step method to incompressible Navier-Stokes equations.Journal of Computational Physics, 59(2):308–323, 1985

    1985

  65. [65]

    Kovachki, Z

    N. Kovachki, Z. Li, B. Liu, K. Azizzadenesheli, K. Bhattacharya, A. Stuart, and A. Anand- kumar. Neural operator: Learning maps between function spaces with applications to PDEs. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(89):1–97, 2023

    2023

  66. [66]

    D. N. Ku, D. P. Giddens, C. K. Zarins, and S. Glagov. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation. positive correlation between plaque location and low oscillating shear stress.Arteriosclerosis: An Official Journal of the American Heart Association, Inc., 5(3):293–302, 1985

    1985

  67. [67]

    Kumar, O

    A. Kumar, O. Y. Hung, M. Piccinelli, P. Eshtehardi, M. T. Corban, D. Sternheim, B. Yang, A. Lefieux, D. S. Molony, E. W. Thompson, et al. Low Coronary Wall Shear Stress Is Associated With Severe Endothelial Dysfunction in Patients With Nonobstructive Coronary Artery Disease.JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 11(20):2072–2080, 2018

    2072

  68. [68]

    Kumar, E

    A. Kumar, E. W. Thompson, A. Lefieux, D. S. Molony, E. L. Davis, N. Chand, S. Fournier, H. S. Lee, J. Suh, K. Sato, et al. High Coronary Shear Stress in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease Predicts Myocardial Infarction.Journal of the American College of Cardiol- ogy, 72(16):1926–1935, 2018

    1926

  69. [69]

    LaDisa Jr, A

    J. LaDisa Jr, A. Ghorbannia, D. Marks, P. Mason, and H. Otake. Advancements and opportunities in characterizing patient-specific wall shear stress imposed by coronary artery stenting.Fluids, 7(10), 2022

    2022

  70. [70]

    Lakshmivarahan and J

    S. Lakshmivarahan and J. M. Lewis. Nudging methods: A critical overview.Data Assimi- lation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications (Vol. II), pages 27–57, 2013

    2013

  71. [71]

    Le Gratiet and J

    L. Le Gratiet and J. Garnier. Recursive co-kriging model for design of computer experiments with multiple levels of fidelity.International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 4(5), 2014

    2014

  72. [72]

    Lee and E

    K. Lee and E. J. Parish. Parameterized neural ordinary differential equations: Applications to computational physics problems.Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 477(2253):20210162, 2021

    2021

  73. [73]

    Lefieux, S

    A. Lefieux, S. Bridio, D. Molony, M. Piccinelli, C. Chiastra, H. Samady, F. Migliavacca, and A. Veneziani. Semi-Automatic Reconstruction of Patient-Specific Stented Coronaries based on Data Assimilation and Computer Aided Design.Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology, pages 1–18, 2022

    2022

  74. [74]

    Z. Li, N. B. Kovachki, K. Azizzadenesheli, K. Bhattacharya, A. Stuart, A. Anandkumar, et al. Fourier neural operator for parametric partial differential equations. InInternational Conference on Learning Representations, 2020

    2020

  75. [75]

    Lin and S

    D. Lin and S. Kenjereˇ s. Towards fast and reliable estimations of 3d pressure, velocity and wall shear stress in aortic blood flow: Cfd-based machine learning approach.Computers in Biology and Medicine, 191:110137, 2025

    2025

  76. [76]

    Liu and Y

    D. Liu and Y. Wang. Multi-Fidelity Physics-Constrained Neural Network and Its Application in Materials Modeling.Journal of Mechanical Design, 141(12):121403, 2019

    2019

  77. [77]

    L. Lu, P. Jin, G. Pang, Z. Zhang, and G. E. Karniadakis. Learning nonlinear operators via deeponet based on the universal approximation theorem of operators.Nature Machine Intelligence, 3(3):218–229, 2021

    2021

  78. [78]

    L. Lu, X. Meng, Z. Mao, and G. E. Karniadakis. DeepXDE: A Deep Learning Library for Solving Differential Equations.SIAM Review, 63(1):208–228, 2021. 19

    2021

  79. [79]

    Maday, A

    Y. Maday, A. T. Patera, J. D. Penn, and M. Yano. A parameterized-background data-weak approach to variational data assimilation: formulation, analysis, and application to acoustics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, 102(5):933–965, 2015

    2015

  80. [80]

    Martin-Tempestti, M

    J. Martin-Tempestti, M. Bracco, U. Morbiducci, B. Lindsey, and A. Veneziani. Data as- similation methods for the quantification of the wall sher stress in coronary arteries. in preparation, 2025

    2025

Showing first 80 references.