pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25453 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-28 · 📡 eess.SP

Polarization-diverse Detection at Microwave Frequencies Using A Passive Metasurface Aperture

Md. Abrar A Mushfik , Mohammad Ali Kaisar , Mohiminul Islam Bhuiyan Sahed , Idban Alamzadeh This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 15:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords metasurfacepolarization detectionpassive arraymicrowavefrequency selectivescattered fieldssensing
0
0 comments X

The pith

A passive metasurface extracts incoming microwave polarization by numerically processing its scattered electric fields.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that polarization information from an incoming microwave signal can be recovered without any active tuning elements or power lines. It does so by designing meta-atoms that respond differently to polarization and scatter in a randomized way, then arranging them into an array whose radiation pattern shifts with frequency. When the scattered fields are measured, their pattern encodes the polarization state and can be inverted numerically. If successful, this removes the need for biasing circuitry and DC feeds that currently complicate reconfigurable surfaces. The approach therefore targets simpler hardware for polarization-sensitive sensing and imaging.

Core claim

We propose a passive metasurface array architecture that is both polarization sensitive and capable of altering radiation patterns with frequency diversity. In particular, we designed a polarization-sensitive meta-atom model with added randomness in the scattering behavior and extended it to a polarization-diverse-frequency-selective array. By capturing the electric fields scattered off from the metasurface, we can numerically acquire the polarization information of the incoming signal. The proposed polarization-diverse array can simplify the polarization measurement techniques and may find its application in polarization sensitive sensing and imaging operations.

What carries the argument

Polarization-sensitive meta-atom model with added randomness in scattering behavior, extended into a frequency-selective array whose scattered fields are measured and inverted.

If this is right

  • Polarization detection becomes possible without distributed DC power lines or biasing circuitry for each meta-atom.
  • Frequency diversity in the array produces distinct radiation patterns that aid the numerical extraction process.
  • The same passive aperture can serve polarization-sensitive sensing and imaging tasks.
  • Hardware complexity for polarization measurement is reduced relative to active metasurface or conventional antenna-array approaches.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the numerical inversion proves robust, the design could be integrated into existing passive surfaces to add polarization capability at low extra cost.
  • The frequency-selective scattering might allow simultaneous operation across multiple bands without retuning.
  • Calibration data collected once per array could enable repeated polarization extraction in the field.

Load-bearing premise

Randomized scattering from the polarization-sensitive meta-atoms produces scattered fields that can be inverted to recover the incoming polarization state reliably.

What would settle it

Measurements on a fabricated array showing that the scattered electric-field patterns remain indistinguishable across different incident polarizations, or that numerical inversion fails to recover the correct polarization states above noise levels.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25453 by Idban Alamzadeh, Md. Abrar A Mushfik, Mohammad Ali Kaisar, Mohiminul Islam Bhuiyan Sahed.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Proposed meta-atom configuration along with the view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The passive metasurface array and the simulation setup. view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Polarization specific sensing of electric field compo view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Mean electric-field (left: magnitude, right: phase) view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Sensed mean electric-field reflection vs. frequency for view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Reflection pattern of the metasurface for view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The gradually decreasing slope of the SVD highlights view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Singular value decomposition of the captured data view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The estimated ˆθp for a set of incident polarization angles symmetric about zero. with the polarization diverse sensing more robust and complex detection capability can be achieved. V. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION This work has presented a fully passive metasurface aperture for polarization-diverse detection at microwave frequencies, built around an anisotropic meta-atom that exhibits strong polarization sen… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Metasurfaces' ability to control electromagnetic wave propagation has led to a rapid paradigm shift in wireless operation. These metasurfaces are often called reconfigurable intelligent surfaces (RISs) due to active tuning elements distributed across the meta-atoms comprising the metasurface array. However, each of these dynamic meta-atoms requires additional DC power lines and biasing circuitry for active tuning. Additionally, achieving polarization diverse operations using compact metasurface configurations is challenging due to the complexity involved in polarization detection. To address these limitations, we propose a passive metasurface array architecture that is both polarization sensitive and capable of altering radiation patterns with frequency diversity. In particular, we designed a polarization-sensitive meta-atom model with added randomness in the scattering behavior and extended it to a polarization-diverse-frequency-selective array. By capturing the electric fields scattered off from the metasurface, we can numerically acquire the polarization information of the incoming signal. The proposed polarization-diverse array can simplify the polarization measurement techniques and may find its application in polarization sensitive sensing and imaging operations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a passive metasurface aperture architecture for polarization-diverse detection at microwave frequencies. It describes a polarization-sensitive meta-atom model incorporating randomness in scattering behavior, extended to a frequency-selective array. The central claim is that electric fields scattered from this passive structure can be captured and processed numerically to recover the polarization state (e.g., Jones vector or Stokes parameters) of an incoming signal, thereby simplifying polarization measurement without active tuning elements or biasing circuitry.

Significance. If the numerical extraction method can be shown to work reliably, the approach would represent a meaningful simplification over conventional polarization-sensitive arrays or active RIS designs, potentially enabling compact, low-power polarization sensing and imaging at microwave frequencies. The passive, frequency-diverse nature could reduce hardware complexity in applications such as radar or wireless sensing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and design section: The claim that scattered fields from the randomized meta-atom array enable numerical polarization acquisition is unsupported by any forward scattering model, array geometry specification, randomness distribution, or formulation of the inverse problem (e.g., how frequency or spatial samples are combined to invert for polarization). No equations, simulations, or error metrics are provided to demonstrate uniqueness, stability under noise, or robustness when ideal meta-atom assumptions are relaxed.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the proposed array 'can simplify the polarization measurement techniques' lacks any comparative analysis, baseline performance data, or quantification of extraction accuracy, rendering the practical advantage over existing passive or active methods unverified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed report. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to incorporate additional details and analyses as outlined.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and design section: The claim that scattered fields from the randomized meta-atom array enable numerical polarization acquisition is unsupported by any forward scattering model, array geometry specification, randomness distribution, or formulation of the inverse problem (e.g., how frequency or spatial samples are combined to invert for polarization). No equations, simulations, or error metrics are provided to demonstrate uniqueness, stability under noise, or robustness when ideal meta-atom assumptions are relaxed.

    Authors: We agree that the current manuscript version presents the concept at a high level in the abstract and design overview without explicit equations for the forward scattering model or the inverse problem. The full text describes the polarization-sensitive meta-atom with randomness and the frequency-selective array architecture, but to strengthen the submission we will add a new section detailing the scattering model (including randomness distribution), array geometry, how frequency samples are used to formulate and solve the inverse problem for the Jones vector or Stokes parameters, and simulation results with error metrics under noise and relaxed assumptions. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The assertion that the proposed array 'can simplify the polarization measurement techniques' lacks any comparative analysis, baseline performance data, or quantification of extraction accuracy, rendering the practical advantage over existing passive or active methods unverified.

    Authors: The referee is correct that the abstract does not include comparative data. In the revision we will add a dedicated comparison subsection with quantitative metrics from simulations, such as polarization extraction accuracy, hardware complexity, and power requirements, benchmarked against conventional passive arrays and active RIS approaches to demonstrate the simplification. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: proposal contains no derivations, equations, or self-referential reductions

full rationale

The manuscript is a high-level conceptual proposal for a passive polarization-sensitive metasurface array. No equations, forward models, inverse formulations, fitted parameters, or citations appear in the abstract or description. The central claim (numerical recovery of polarization from scattered fields) is asserted without any derivation chain that could reduce to its own inputs by construction. This is the common case of a non-circular design sketch whose validity must be assessed by external validation rather than internal reduction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review provides no explicit parameters, axioms, or invented entities; the meta-atom model with randomness is implied but not detailed.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5495 in / 1102 out tokens · 49798 ms · 2026-05-07T15:20:03.883807+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

68 extracted references · 68 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Two-dimensional dynamic metasurface apertures for computational microwave imaging,

    T. Sleasman, M. F. Imani, and D. R. Smith, “Two-dimensional dynamic metasurface apertures for computational microwave imaging,”IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2299– 2303, 2018

    work page 2018

  2. [2]

    Frequency-diverse microwave imaging using planar dy- namic metasurfaces,

    O. Yurduseven, D. L. Marks, T. Fromenteze, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Frequency-diverse microwave imaging using planar dy- namic metasurfaces,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 65, no. 3, pp. 1310–1321, 2017

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Dual-polarized frequency-diverse metaimager for computational polarimetric imaging,

    M. Zhao, S. Zhu, T. Fromenteze, M. A. B. Abbasi, X. Chen, Y . Huang, and O. Yurduseven, “Dual-polarized frequency-diverse metaimager for computational polarimetric imaging,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, 2024, accepted for publication

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Computational polarimetric microwave imaging,

    T. Fromenteze, O. Yurduseven, M. Boyarsky, J. Gollub, D. L. Marks, and D. R. Smith, “Computational polarimetric microwave imaging,”Optics Express, vol. 25, no. 22, pp. 27 488–27 505, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Two-dimensional beam steering using an electrically tunable impedance surface,

    D. F. Sievenpiper, J. H. Schaffner, H. J. Song, R. Y . Loo, and G. Tang- onan, “Two-dimensional beam steering using an electrically tunable impedance surface,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 51, no. 10, pp. 2713–2722, 2003

    work page 2003

  6. [6]

    Huygens’ metasurfaces via the equivalence principle: Design and applications,

    A. Epstein and G. V . Eleftheriades, “Huygens’ metasurfaces via the equivalence principle: Design and applications,”Journal of the Optical Society of America B, vol. 33, no. 2, pp. A31–A50, 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Simultaneous spectrum and polarization detection based on a single metasurface,

    Y . Zhao and C. Tian, “Simultaneous spectrum and polarization detection based on a single metasurface,”ACS Photonics, vol. 12, no. 9, pp. 5283– 5290, 2025

    work page 2025

  8. [8]

    All-dielectric polarization- sensitive metasurface for terahertz polarimetric imaging,

    J. Baek, J. Kim, J. H. Seol, and M. Kim, “All-dielectric polarization- sensitive metasurface for terahertz polarimetric imaging,”Scientific Reports, vol. 14, p. 7544, 2024

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    Field-programmable beam reconfiguring based on digitally controlled coding metasurfaces,

    X. Wan, M. Q. Qi, T. Y . Chen, and T. J. Cui, “Field-programmable beam reconfiguring based on digitally controlled coding metasurfaces,” Electronics Letters, vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 50–52, 2015

    work page 2015

  10. [10]

    Large metasurface aperture for millimeter wave com- putational imaging,

    J. N. Gollub, O. Yurduseven, K. P. Trofatter, M. F. Imani, T. Sleasman, and D. R. Smith, “Large metasurface aperture for millimeter wave com- putational imaging,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 65, no. 6, pp. 3042–3053, 2017

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    Programmable metasurface-based rf chain-free 8psk wireless transmitter,

    J. Y . Dai, W. Tang, L. X. Yanget al., “Programmable metasurface-based rf chain-free 8psk wireless transmitter,”Electronics Letters, vol. 55, no. 7, pp. 417–420, 2019

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    First-principles homogenization theory for periodic metamate- rials,

    A. Al `u, “First-principles homogenization theory for periodic metamate- rials,”Physical Review B, vol. 84, no. 7, p. 075153, 2011

    work page 2011

  13. [13]

    A new wireless communication paradigm through software- controlled metasurfaces,

    C. Liaskos, S. Nie, A. Tsioliaridou, A. Pitsillides, S. Ioannidis, and I. F. Akyildiz, “A new wireless communication paradigm through software- controlled metasurfaces,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 56, no. 9, pp. 162–169, 2018

    work page 2018

  14. [14]

    Orthogonal coded active illumination for millimeter wave, massive-mimo computational imaging with metasurface antennas,

    M. A. Pedross-Engel, D. Arnitz, J. N. Gollub, O. Yurduseven, K. P. Trofatter, M. F. Imani, T. Sleasman, M. Boyarsky, D. L. Marks, and D. R. Smith, “Orthogonal coded active illumination for millimeter wave, massive-mimo computational imaging with metasurface antennas,” in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference, 2017

    work page 2017

  15. [15]

    Metamaterial apertures for computational imaging,

    J. Hunt, T. Driscoll, A. Mrozack, G. Lipworth, M. Reynolds, D. Brady, and D. R. Smith, “Metamaterial apertures for computational imaging,” Science, vol. 339, no. 6117, pp. 310–313, 2013

    work page 2013

  16. [16]

    Rahmat-Samii and E

    Y . Rahmat-Samii and E. Michielssen,Electromagnetic Optimization by Genetic Algorithms. New York, NY: Wiley, 1999

    work page 1999

  17. [17]

    Computational imaging using a frequency-diverse microwave antenna,

    T. Fromenteze, X. Liu, M. Boyarsky, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Computational imaging using a frequency-diverse microwave antenna,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 464–474, 2015

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    Security screening via computational imaging using frequency-diverse metasurface apertures,

    D. R. Smith, M. S. Reynolds, J. N. Gollub, D. L. Marks, M. F. Imani, O. Yurdusevenet al., “Security screening via computational imaging using frequency-diverse metasurface apertures,” inProceedings of SPIE, vol. 10189, 2017, p. 101890X

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Computa- tional imaging using frequency-diverse metasurfaces,

    J. N. Gollub, O. Yurduseven, M. F. Imani, H. Odabasi, T. Sleasman, K. P. Trofatter, M. Boyarsky, D. L. Marks, and D. R. Smith, “Computa- tional imaging using frequency-diverse metasurfaces,” in11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), 2017, pp. 1–4

    work page 2017

  20. [20]

    Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials, and programmable metamaterials,

    T. J. Cui, M. Q. Qi, X. Wan, J. Zhao, and Q. Cheng, “Coding metamaterials, digital metamaterials, and programmable metamaterials,” Light: Science & Applications, vol. 3, no. 10, p. e218, 2014

    work page 2014

  21. [21]

    High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band,

    D. Sievenpiper, L. Zhang, R. F. J. Broas, N. G. Alexopoulos, and E. Yablonovitch, “High-impedance electromagnetic surfaces with a forbidden frequency band,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 47, no. 11, pp. 2059–2074, 1999

    work page 2059

  22. [22]

    Synthetic aperture radar with dynamic metasurface antennas: A conceptual development,

    M. Boyarsky, T. Sleasman, L. Pulido-Mancera, T. Fromenteze, A. Pedross-Engel, C. Watts, M. F. Imani, M. S. Reynolds, and D. R. Smith, “Synthetic aperture radar with dynamic metasurface antennas: A conceptual development,”Journal of the Optical Society of America A, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1001–1010, 2017

    work page 2017

  23. [23]

    Dynamic metamaterial aperture for microwave imaging,

    T. Sleasman, M. F. Imani, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Dynamic metamaterial aperture for microwave imaging,”Applied Physics Letters, vol. 107, no. 20, p. 204101, 2015

    work page 2015

  24. [24]

    Dynamic metasurface antennas for computational imaging,

    M. F. Imani, T. Sleasman, M. Boyarsky, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Dynamic metasurface antennas for computational imaging,” 2017

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    Dynamic metasurface antennas for computational imaging,

    D. R. Smith, M. F. Imani, T. Sleasman, A. V . Diebold, and M. Boyarsky, “Dynamic metasurface antennas for computational imaging,”IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 125–134, 2022

    work page 2022

  26. [26]

    Implementation and characterization of a two-dimensional printed circuit dynamic metasurface aperture for computational microwave imaging,

    T. A. Sleasman, M. F. Imani, A. V . Diebold, M. Boyarsky, K. P. Trofatter, and D. R. Smith, “Implementation and characterization of a two-dimensional printed circuit dynamic metasurface aperture for computational microwave imaging,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 69, no. 4, pp. 2151–2164, 2021

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Microwave integrated sensing and imaging using re- configurable metacavity,

    M. Zhao, S. Zhu, X. Chen, T. Fromenteze, M. A. B. Abbasi, and O. Yurduseven, “Microwave integrated sensing and imaging using re- configurable metacavity,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    Frequency-diverse reflection metasurface antenna design for computational microwave imaging,

    A. Li, M. Zhao, D. P. Lynch, S. Zhu, M. A. B. Abbasi, and O. Yur- duseven, “Frequency-diverse reflection metasurface antenna design for computational microwave imaging,”IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 5, no. 5, pp. 1240–1248, 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Frequency-diverse metacavity cassegrain antenna for differential coincidence imaging,

    M. Zhao, S. Zhu, D. P. Lynch, Y . Nian, T. Fromenteze, M. Khalily, X. Chen, V . Fusco, and O. Yurduseven, “Frequency-diverse metacavity cassegrain antenna for differential coincidence imaging,”IEEE Trans- actions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 71, no. 11, pp. 9054–9059, 2023

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Frequency-diverse bunching metasurface antenna for microwave computational imaging,

    M. Zhao, S. Zhu, D. Li, T. Fromenteze, M. Khalily, X. Chen, V . Fusco, and O. Yurduseven, “Frequency-diverse bunching metasurface antenna for microwave computational imaging,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 72, no. 5, pp. 3950–3961, 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    Single channel frequency diverse computational imaging system for through- the-wall sensing,

    M. Garc ´ıa-Fern´andez, G. ´Alvarez-Narciandi, and O. Yurduseven, “Single channel frequency diverse computational imaging system for through- the-wall sensing,”IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sens- ing, vol. 62, 2024

    work page 2024

  32. [32]

    S. A. Tretyakov,Analytical Modeling in Applied Electromagnetics. Norwood, MA: Artech House, 2003

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Fre- quency domain image reconstruction with multistatic dynamic metasur- face antennas,

    M. Garc ´ıa-Fern´andez, G. ´Alvarez-Narciandi, and O. Yurduseven, “Fre- quency domain image reconstruction with multistatic dynamic metasur- face antennas,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 124 728–124 737, 2022

    work page 2022

  34. [34]

    Computational imaging with dynamic metasurfaces: A recipe for simple and low-cost microwave imaging,

    T. Sleasman, M. F. Imani, A. V . Diebold, M. Boyarsky, and D. R. Smith, “Computational imaging with dynamic metasurfaces: A recipe for simple and low-cost microwave imaging,”IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine, vol. 64, no. 4, pp. 125–134, 2022

    work page 2022

  35. [35]

    Detecting motion in a room using a dynamic metasurface antenna,

    A. X. Oesterling, M. F. Imani, O. S. Mizrahi, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Detecting motion in a room using a dynamic metasurface antenna,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 222 496–222 504, 2020

    work page 2020

  36. [36]

    Fourier-based near-field three-dimensional image reconstruction in a multistatic imaging structure using dynamic metasurface antennas,

    A. M. Molaei, T. Fromenteze, S. Hu, V . Fusco, and O. Yurduseven, “Fourier-based near-field three-dimensional image reconstruction in a multistatic imaging structure using dynamic metasurface antennas,” IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, vol. 8, pp. 1089–1100, 2022

    work page 2022

  37. [37]

    Wireless sensing using dynamic metasurface antennas: Challenges and opportunities,

    G. Lan, M. F. Imani, P. del Hougne, W. Hu, D. R. Smith, and M. Gorla- tova, “Wireless sensing using dynamic metasurface antennas: Challenges and opportunities,”IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 66–71, 2020

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Multistatic mimo sparse imaging using low rank matrix recovery and error matrix,

    S. Hu, A. M. Molaei, O. Yurduseven, H. Meng, R. Nilavalan, L. Gan, and X. Chen, “Multistatic mimo sparse imaging using low rank matrix recovery and error matrix,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1285–1295, 2023

    work page 2023

  39. [39]

    Dynamic metasurface antenna-based mills-cross aper- ture for 3d computational microwave imaging,

    G. ´Alvarez-Narciandi, M. Garc ´ıa-Fern´andez, V . Skouroliakou, and O. Yurduseven, “Dynamic metasurface antenna-based mills-cross aper- ture for 3d computational microwave imaging,”IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 3377–3381, 2024

    work page 2024

  40. [40]

    Computational polarimetric imaging using dynamic metasurface apertures,

    M. F. Imani, T. Sleasman, O. Yurduseven, J. N. Gollub, and D. R. Smith, “Computational polarimetric imaging using dynamic metasurface apertures,”IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, vol. 2, pp. 1110–1122, 2021

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    Near-field localization with antenna arrays in the presence of direction-dependent mutual coupling,

    Z. Ebadi, A. M. Molaei, M. A. B. Abbasi, S. Cotton, A. Tukmanov, and O. Yurduseven, “Near-field localization with antenna arrays in the presence of direction-dependent mutual coupling,”IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2025

    work page 2025

  42. [42]

    Wireless communications with reconfigurable intelligent surface: Path loss modeling and experimental measurement,

    W. Tang, X. Chen, M. Z. Chen, J. Y . Dai, Y . Han, M. Di Renzo, S. Jin, Q. Cheng, and T. J. Cui, “Wireless communications with reconfigurable intelligent surface: Path loss modeling and experimental measurement,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 421– 439, 2021

    work page 2021

  43. [43]

    Polarization-enabled mimo bidirectional d2d communications via ris,

    A. Bhowal and S. A ¨ıssa, “Polarization-enabled mimo bidirectional d2d communications via ris,”IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 71, no. 1, 2023

    work page 2023

  44. [44]

    Metamaterial iris-based cavity antenna for mm-wave computational polarimetric imaging,

    A. Li, M. Zhao, S. Zhu, M. A. B. Abbasi, and O. Yurduseven, “Metamaterial iris-based cavity antenna for mm-wave computational polarimetric imaging,”IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 3367–3371, 2024

    work page 2024

  45. [45]

    Deep learning for sensing matrix prediction in computational microwave imaging with coded-apertures,

    J. Zhang, R. Sharma, M. Garc ´ıa-Fern´andez, G. ´Alvarez-Narciandi, M. A. B. Abbasi, and O. Yurduseven, “Deep learning for sensing matrix prediction in computational microwave imaging with coded-apertures,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 16 844–16 855, 2024

    work page 2024

  46. [46]

    Frequency-diverse metasurface imaging,

    J. N. Gollub, O. Yurduseven, M. F. Imani, H. Odabasi, T. Sleasman, and D. R. Smith, “Frequency-diverse metasurface imaging,” 2017

    work page 2017

  47. [47]

    Advanced processing for computational microwave polarimetry,

    T. Sleasman, O. Yurduseven, and D. R. Smith, “Advanced processing for computational microwave polarimetry,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 166 261–166 272, 2020

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Single radar imaging motion deblurring through psf estimation and convolution regularizer,

    J. Zhang, R. Sharma, M. Garc ´ıa-Fern´andez, C. Zhang, and O. Yurdu- seven, “Single radar imaging motion deblurring through psf estimation and convolution regularizer,”IEEE Transactions on Radar Systems, 2024

    work page 2024

  49. [49]

    A reconfigurable intelligent surface with integrated sensing capability,

    I. Alamzadeh, G. C. Alexandropoulos, N. Shlezinger, and M. F. Imani, “A reconfigurable intelligent surface with integrated sensing capability,” Scientific Reports, vol. 11, p. 20737, 2021

    work page 2021

  50. [50]

    Hybrid reconfigurable intelligent meta- surfaces: Enabling simultaneous tunable reflections and sensing for 6g wireless communications,

    G. C. Alexandropouloset al., “Hybrid reconfigurable intelligent meta- surfaces: Enabling simultaneous tunable reflections and sensing for 6g wireless communications,”IEEE Vehicular Technology Magazine, vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2024

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Clas- sigan: Joint image reconstruction and classification in computational microwave imaging,

    J. Zhang, G. ´Alvarez-Narciandi, M. Garc ´ıa-Fern´andez, R. Sharma, C. Zhang, P. del Hougne, M. A. B. Abbasi, and O. Yurduseven, “Clas- sigan: Joint image reconstruction and classification in computational microwave imaging,”IEEE Transactions on Radar Systems, 2025

    work page 2025

  52. [52]

    Bianisotropic metasurfaces for optimal polarization control: Analysis and synthesis,

    C. Pfeiffer and A. Grbic, “Bianisotropic metasurfaces for optimal polarization control: Analysis and synthesis,”Physical Review Applied, vol. 2, no. 4, p. 044011, 2014

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    Additively-manufactured all-dielectric microwave polarization converters using ceramic stere- olithography,

    S. Young, M. Kauf, J. Kutsch, and A. Grbic, “Additively-manufactured all-dielectric microwave polarization converters using ceramic stere- olithography,”IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 2023

    work page 2023

  54. [54]

    A w-shaped antenna with spatial polarization variation for direction finding,

    S. Choi and K. Sarabandi, “A w-shaped antenna with spatial polarization variation for direction finding,”IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propaga- tion Letters, vol. 17, no. 12, pp. 2429–2433, 2018

    work page 2018

  55. [55]

    Lens- loaded coded aperture with increased information capacity for compu- tational microwave imaging,

    O. Yurduseven, M. A. B. Abbasi, T. Fromenteze, and V . Fusco, “Lens- loaded coded aperture with increased information capacity for compu- tational microwave imaging,”Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 9, p. 1531, 2020

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Detecting angle of arrival on a hybrid ris using intensity-only data,

    I. Alamzadeh and M. F. Imani, “Detecting angle of arrival on a hybrid ris using intensity-only data,”IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 22, no. 9, pp. 2325–2329, 2023

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Accurate direction-of-arrival estimation method based on space–time modulated metasurface,

    X. Fang, M. Li, J. Han, D. Ramaccia, A. Toscano, F. Bilotti, and D. Ding, “Accurate direction-of-arrival estimation method based on space–time modulated metasurface,”IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 10 950–10 962, 2022

    work page 2022

  58. [58]

    Intelligent meta-imagers: From compressed to learned sensing,

    C. Saigre-Tardif, R. Faqiri, H. Zhao, L. Li, and P. de Hougne, “Intelligent meta-imagers: From compressed to learned sensing,”Applied Physics Reviews, vol. 9, no. 1, 2022

    work page 2022

  59. [59]

    Frequency-diverse holographic metasurface antenna for near-field microwave computational imaging,

    J. Hanet al., “Frequency-diverse holographic metasurface antenna for near-field microwave computational imaging,”Frontiers in Materials, vol. 8, p. 766889, 2021

    work page 2021

  60. [60]

    Frequency-diverse mimo metasurface antenna for computational imaging with aperture rotation technique,

    T. Wang, J. Han, X. Ma, H. Liu, and L. Li, “Frequency-diverse mimo metasurface antenna for computational imaging with aperture rotation technique,”Frontiers in Materials, vol. 9, p. 1112339, 2023

    work page 2023

  61. [61]

    Polsar image modulation using a flexible metasurface with independently controllable polariza- tions,

    Y . Wu, J. Wang, J. Wu, G. Sun, and D. Feng, “Polsar image modulation using a flexible metasurface with independently controllable polariza- tions,”Remote Sensing, vol. 17, no. 16, p. 2870, 2025

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    Electrically tunable metasurface for multi-polarized reflection,

    B. Li, Y . Wang, C. Wang, and S. Li, “Electrically tunable metasurface for multi-polarized reflection,”Remote Sensing, vol. 17, no. 4, p. 700, 2025

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Passive microwave spectral imaging with dynamic metasurface apertures,

    A. V . Diebold, M. F. Imani, T. Fromenteze, D. L. Marks, and D. R. Smith, “Passive microwave spectral imaging with dynamic metasurface apertures,”Optica, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 527–536, 2020

    work page 2020

  64. [64]

    Grating lobe suppression in metasurface antenna arrays with a waveguide feed layer,

    M. Boyarsky, M. F. Imani, and D. R. Smith, “Grating lobe suppression in metasurface antenna arrays with a waveguide feed layer,”Optics Express, vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 23 991–24 006, 2020

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Advanced processing of 3d computational microwave polarimetry using a near-field frequency-diverse antenna,

    R. Peng, O. Yurduseven, T. Fromenteze, and D. R. Smith, “Advanced processing of 3d computational microwave polarimetry using a near-field frequency-diverse antenna,”IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 166 261–166 272, 2020

    work page 2020

  66. [66]

    Sensing and reconfigurable reflection of electromagnetic waves from a metasurface with sparse sensing elements,

    I. Alamzadeh and M. F. Imani, “Sensing and reconfigurable reflection of electromagnetic waves from a metasurface with sparse sensing elements,”IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 105 954–105 965, 2022

    work page 2022

  67. [67]

    Phaseless computational ghost imaging at microwave frequencies using a dynamic metasurface aperture,

    A. V . Diebold, M. F. Imani, T. Sleasman, and D. R. Smith, “Phaseless computational ghost imaging at microwave frequencies using a dynamic metasurface aperture,”Appl. Opt., vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2142–2149, Mar 2018. [Online]. Available: https://opg.optica.org/ao/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-57-9-2142

    work page 2018

  68. [68]

    Conformal frequency-diverse meta- surface for computational aoa detection,

    M. F. Imani and I. Alamzadeh, “Conformal frequency-diverse meta- surface for computational aoa detection,”IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 2634–2638, 2023

    work page 2023