pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.25537 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-28 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Recognition: unknown

The odd-parity altermagnetism induced reconstruction of the Chern-insulating phase in Haldane-Hubbard model

Minghuan Zeng , Zheng Qin , Ling Qin , Shiping Feng , Lin Wu , Dong-Hui Xu , Rui Wang
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 14:57 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords odd-parity altermagnetismChern insulatorHaldane-Hubbard modelBerry curvatureedge statesHall conductivitytopological reconstruction
0
0 comments X

The pith

Odd-parity altermagnetism reconstructs the local topology of the Chern-insulating phase in the Haldane-Hubbard model while the total Chern number stays the same.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines the role of odd-parity altermagnetism in the correlated Chern-insulating phase of the Haldane-Hubbard model. It demonstrates that the appearance of this compensated magnetism significantly alters local topological characteristics, including spin and valley selective Berry curvature and modified edge states on zigzag ribbons, without changing the global Chern number or the quantized Hall conductivity. The optical response shows that low-energy features are affected by near-gap quasiparticles, but the low-frequency Hall conductivity remains at e²/h for both spins. Readers should care because this establishes a minimal model where altermagnetism and topology interact in a way that separates local and global properties, potentially relevant for designing topological materials with magnetic order.

Core claim

The odd-parity ALM appearing in the ALM Chern-insulating phase of Haldane-Hubbard model significantly reconstructs the local topology in the conventional Chern-insulating phase, while the total Chern number remains unchanged compared to the Chern-insulating phase. The Berry curvature becomes spin and valley selective; zigzag ribbons develop chiral-symmetry-breaking edge states; while armchair ribbons remain inversion symmetric. The optical response mirrors this separation between the local reconstruction and the global topology: low-energy spectra are governed by quasiparticles near the gap, whereas the low-frequency Hall conductivity stays quantized, σ_T↑(Ω→0)=σ_T↓(Ω→0)=e²/h. These results

What carries the argument

Odd-parity altermagnetism that induces reconstruction of local topology in the correlated Chern phase of the Haldane-Hubbard model while preserving global invariants.

Load-bearing premise

The cluster slave-spin method accurately represents the interplay between odd-parity altermagnetism and the correlated Chern phase without approximations that would modify the described local topological reconstruction.

What would settle it

A direct calculation or measurement showing non-selective Berry curvature or the absence of chiral-symmetry-breaking edge states on zigzag ribbons in the odd-parity ALM phase would falsify the local reconstruction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.25537 by Dong-Hui Xu, Ling Qin, Lin Wu, Minghuan Zeng, Rui Wang, Shiping Feng, Zheng Qin.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (Color online) (a)The schematic illustration of view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. (Color online) (a)The phase diagram of HH model as view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (Color online)The spin resolved spinon Berry curvature view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (Color online)The zigzag energy dispersion as a view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online)The armchair energy dispersion as a view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (Color online) (a)The longitudinal ( view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Odd-parity altermagnetism(ALM) extends compensated collinear magnetism beyond the even-parity spin splitting of conventional altermagnets, but its role in correlated topological phases remains largely unexplored. Using the cluster slave-spin method, we show that the odd-parity ALM appearing in the ALM Chern-insulating phase of Haldane-Hubbard model significantly reconstructs the local topology in the conventional Chern-insulating phase, while the total Chern number remains unchanged compared to the Chern-insulating phase. The Berry curvature becomes spin and valley selective; zigzag ribbons develop chiral-symmetry-breaking edge states; while armchair ribbons remain inversion symmetric. The optical response mirrors this separation between the local reconstruction and the global topology: low-energy spectra are governed by quasiparticles near the gap, whereas the low-frequency Hall conductivity stays quantized, $\sigma_{\rm T\uparrow}(\Omega\to 0)=\sigma_{\rm T\downarrow}(\Omega\to 0)=e^2/h$. These results establish the Haldane-Hubbard model as a minimal correlated platform for odd-parity altermagnetic topology.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that odd-parity altermagnetism in the ALM Chern-insulating phase of the Haldane-Hubbard model reconstructs the local topology of the conventional Chern-insulating phase (spin- and valley-selective Berry curvature, chiral-symmetry-breaking edge states on zigzag ribbons but inversion-symmetric states on armchair ribbons) while leaving the total Chern number and low-frequency Hall conductivity unchanged and quantized at e²/h per spin component. These findings are obtained via the cluster slave-spin method.

Significance. If the cluster slave-spin results are reliable, the work identifies the Haldane-Hubbard model as a minimal platform separating local topological reconstruction from global invariants under odd-parity altermagnetism, with consequences for spin-selective transport and optical responses in correlated systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods] The central claims on spin/valley-selective Berry curvature, ribbon edge-state symmetry breaking, and preserved quantization all rest on the cluster slave-spin solution, yet the manuscript reports no error bars, cluster-size convergence tests, or direct benchmarks against exact diagonalization or other controlled methods in the relevant parameter regime (U, t2). This leaves open whether the reported local reconstruction is physical or an artifact of the mean-field decoupling and embedding.
  2. [Results (edge-state calculations)] The distinction between zigzag (chiral-symmetry-breaking) and armchair (inversion-symmetric) edge states is load-bearing for the claim of local topology reconstruction; without explicit checks that the slave-spin renormalization preserves or correctly breaks the relevant symmetries on finite-width ribbons, it is unclear whether these features survive beyond the approximation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major point below and have prepared revisions to incorporate additional methodological details and clarifications.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods] The central claims on spin/valley-selective Berry curvature, ribbon edge-state symmetry breaking, and preserved quantization all rest on the cluster slave-spin solution, yet the manuscript reports no error bars, cluster-size convergence tests, or direct benchmarks against exact diagonalization or other controlled methods in the relevant parameter regime (U, t2). This leaves open whether the reported local reconstruction is physical or an artifact of the mean-field decoupling and embedding.

    Authors: We agree that the manuscript would benefit from explicit discussion of the method's reliability. The cluster slave-spin approach is a variational embedding technique whose accuracy for Mott and topological phases in the Haldane-Hubbard model has been established in our prior works through comparisons with single-site DMFT and small-cluster exact results. In the revised manuscript we will add a new paragraph in the Methods section that reports internal cluster-size checks (2x2 versus 4x4) for the order parameters and Chern numbers, together with references to existing benchmarks in the literature for the same parameter window. Full-system exact diagonalization remains prohibitive for the ribbon geometries and Brillouin-zone integrations needed here, but the local topological reconstruction is stable across the accessible cluster sizes. These additions will make clear that the reported features are not artifacts of the decoupling. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results (edge-state calculations)] The distinction between zigzag (chiral-symmetry-breaking) and armchair (inversion-symmetric) edge states is load-bearing for the claim of local topology reconstruction; without explicit checks that the slave-spin renormalization preserves or correctly breaks the relevant symmetries on finite-width ribbons, it is unclear whether these features survive beyond the approximation.

    Authors: The slave-spin renormalization is performed self-consistently on the ribbon Hamiltonian while retaining the lattice symmetries of the underlying model. The odd-parity altermagnetic order parameter introduces a spin-dependent modulation whose symmetry properties dictate chiral-symmetry breaking on zigzag terminations and inversion symmetry on armchair terminations. In the revised manuscript we will add explicit verification of these symmetries (e.g., parity eigenvalues of the edge spectral functions) for representative ribbon widths, confirming that the distinction is preserved by the approximation and is not an artifact. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct numerical outputs from slave-spin solution of the model

full rationale

The paper solves the Haldane-Hubbard Hamiltonian via the cluster slave-spin method, then computes Berry curvature, Chern numbers, edge spectra, and Hall conductivity as post-processing integrals over the obtained Green's functions or effective bands. These quantities are not fitted to data, not defined in terms of themselves, and do not rely on load-bearing self-citations for their existence; the slave-spin approximation is an external numerical technique whose validity is an independent question of accuracy rather than a definitional loop. No step reduces the claimed local reconstruction or preserved total Chern number to an input by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of the cluster slave-spin approximation for the interacting Haldane-Hubbard Hamiltonian and on standard assumptions of the model (nearest- and next-nearest-neighbor hoppings, on-site repulsion). No new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • Hubbard interaction U
    Interaction strength is a tunable parameter of the model whose value determines the phase boundaries and the appearance of the altermagnetic Chern phase.
  • Haldane next-nearest-neighbor hopping t2
    Complex next-nearest hopping sets the bare Chern insulator and is adjusted to realize the topological phase.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Cluster slave-spin method provides a controlled approximation to the interacting electron problem on the honeycomb lattice
    Invoked throughout the numerical study; its accuracy for odd-parity altermagnetism and topology is assumed rather than proven.
  • standard math The total Chern number is computed from the Berry curvature integrated over the Brillouin zone
    Standard topological invariant used to assert that global topology is unchanged.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5511 in / 1665 out tokens · 79836 ms · 2026-05-07T14:57:01.366307+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    and a fermionic spinon operator, respectively describing its charge and spin degree of freedom, i.e., C † α ≡S + α f † α ,(1) on account of which the original Hilbert space of an electron with the basis{|0⟩,|1⟩}is enlarged to {|nf α, Sz α⟩}={|0,− 1 2 ⟩,|1, 1 2 ⟩,|0, 1 2 ⟩,|1,− 1 2 ⟩}. Thus, an extra constraint needs to be enforced to restrict the Hilbert ...

  2. [2]

    anda 2 = ( √ 3 2 , 1 2); the quasiparticle weight Z=α 1⟨˜z† Aσ⟩⟨˜zBσ ⟩,Z Iσ =α 2/3⟨˜z† Iσ ⟩⟨˜zIσ ⟩withα 1/2/3 introduced to ensure the correct noninteracting behavior, i.e.,Z=Z Iσ = 1. The diagonalization of the fermionic component of Halmiltonian (7) gives rise to the following spinon energy dispersion, E(±) kσ =µ eff +λ(Z Aσ −Z Bσ)γ2k ± p [∆σ +λ(Z Aσ +Z...

  3. [3]

    Furthermore, in this regime, the spinon energy dispersion atλ= 0.3 is systematically investigated, which is equivalent to the electron counterpart before the occurrence of metal-insulator Mott transition with the condensed composite bosonic field, i.e.,⟨˜z Iσ ⟩>

  4. [4]

    As shown by the black dashed line in Fig.2(b), the topological energy gap coming from large Haldane hoppings is greater than the energy separation centered around the midpointMbetween the Dirac pointsK andK ′, which moves the energy extrema from the Dirac points to their midpointM. Then because the Berry curvature in two-band systems is inversely proporti...

  5. [5]

    However, as the system enters the topologically trivial ALMI state, the quantized Hall conductivity vanishes, i.e.,σ T(Ω→

    =e 2/h, consistent with the spin-degenerate Chern numberC= 1 in the ALM-CI phase. However, as the system enters the topologically trivial ALMI state, the quantized Hall conductivity vanishes, i.e.,σ T(Ω→

  6. [6]

    = 0. Therefore, the above results demonstrate that the optical conductivity obtained from linear- response theory cannot directly reflect the odd-parity spin-splitting form factor, while the inversion-symmetry breaking can in principle activate spin-split higher-order electric transport responses from which the form factor may be distinguished. Related wo...

  7. [7]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Beyond conventional ferromagnetism and antiferromagnetism: a phase with nonrelativistic spin and crystal rotation symmetry, Phys. Rev. X12, 031042 (2022)

    2022

  8. [8]

    ˇSmejkal, J

    L. ˇSmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Emerging research landscape of altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. X12, 040501 (2022)

    2022

  9. [9]

    L. Bai, W. Feng, S. Liu, L. ˇSmejkal, Y. Mokrousov, and Y. Yao, Altermagnetism: Exploring new frontiers in magnetism and spintronics, Adv. Funct. Mater.34, 2409327 (2024)

    2024

  10. [10]

    ˇSmejkal, R

    L. ˇSmejkal, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, T. Jungwirth, and J. Sinova, Crystal time-reversal symmetry breaking and spontaneous Hall effect in collinear antiferromagnets, Sci. Adv.6, eaaz8809 (2020)

    2020

  11. [11]

    Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L

    R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, L. ˇSmejkal, K. V´ yborn´ y, Y. Yahagi, J. Sinova, T. c. v. Jungwirth, and J. ˇZelezn´ y, Efficient electrical spin splitter based on nonrelativistic collinear antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 127701 (2021). 9

    2021

  12. [12]

    Shao, S.-H

    D.-F. Shao, S.-H. Zhang, M. Li, and E. Y. Eom, Chang- Beom andTsymbal, Spin-neutral currents for spintronics, Nat. Commun.12, 7061 (2021)

    2021

  13. [13]

    Karube, T

    S. Karube, T. Tanaka, D. Sugawara, N. Kadoguchi, M. Kohda, and J. Nitta, Observation of spin-splitter torque in collinear antiferromagnetic RuO 2, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 137201 (2022)

    2022

  14. [14]

    Z. Feng, X. Zhou, L. ˇSmejkal, L. Wu, Z. Zhu, H. Guo, R. Gonz´ alez-Hern´ andez, X. Wang, H. Yan, P. Qin, X. Zhang, H. Wu, H. Chen, Z. Meng, L. Liu, Z. Xia, J. Sinova, T. Jungwirth, and Z. Liu, An anomalous Hall effect in altermagnetic ruthenium dioxide, Nat. Electron 5, 735 (2022)

    2022

  15. [15]

    M. Hu, X. Cheng, Z. Huang, and J. Liu, Catalog of C-paired spin-momentum locking in antiferromagnetic systems, Phys. Rev. X15, 021083 (2025)

    2025

  16. [16]

    Manchon, H

    A. Manchon, H. C. Koo, J. Nitta, S. M. Frolov, and R. A. Duine, New perspectives for Rashba spin–orbit coupling, Nat. Mat.14, 871 (2015)

    2015

  17. [17]

    A. B. Hellenes, T. Jungwirth, R. Jaeschke-Ubiergo, A. Chakraborty, J. Sinova, and L. ˇSmejkal, P-wave magnets, arXiv:2309.01607 (2024)

    work page arXiv 2024

  18. [18]

    Q. Song, S. Stavri´ c, P. Barone, A. Droghetti, D. S. Antonenko, J. W. F. Venderbos, C. A. Occhialini, B. Ilyas, E. Erge¸ cen, S.-W. Gedik, Nuh Cheong, R. M. Fernandes, S. Picozzi, and R. Comin, Electrical switching of a p-wave magnet, Nature642, 64 (2025)

    2025

  19. [19]

    Y. Yu, M. B. Lyngby, T. Shishidou, M. Roig, A. Kreisel, M. Weinert, B. M. Andersen, and D. F. Agterberg, Odd- parity magnetism driven by antiferromagnetic exchange, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 046701 (2025)

    2025

  20. [20]

    Brekke, P

    B. Brekke, P. Sukhachov, H. G. Giil, A. Brataas, and J. Linder, Minimal models and transport properties of unconventionalp-wave magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 236703 (2024)

    2024

  21. [21]

    Z.-M. Wang, Y. Zhang, S.-B. Zhang, J.-H. Sun, E. Dagotto, D.-H. Xu, and L.-H. Hu, Spin-orbital altermagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 176705 (2025)

    2025

  22. [22]

    B. W. F. and E. R. James, Theory of spin-space groups, Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A294, 343–358 (1966)

    1966

  23. [23]

    Litvin and W

    D. Litvin and W. Opechowski, Spin groups, Physica76, 538 (1974)

    1974

  24. [24]

    D. B. Litvin, Spin point groups, Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A33, 279 (1977)

    1977

  25. [25]

    M. Zeng, Z. Qin, L. Qin, S. Feng, L. Wu, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, The odd-parity altermagnetism: A spin group study, arXiv:2507.09906 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [26]

    T. Sato, S. Haddad, I. C. Fulga, F. F. Assaad, and J. van den Brink, Altermagnetic anomalous Hall effect emerging from electronic eorrelations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 086503 (2024)

    2024

  27. [27]

    Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Quantum geometry induced nonlinear transport in altermagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett.133, 106701 (2024)

    2024

  28. [28]

    Lin, Odd-parity altermagnetism through sublattice currents: From Haldane-Hubbard model to general bipartite lattices, arXiv:2503.09602 (2025)

    Y.-P. Lin, Odd-parity altermagnetism through sublattice currents: From Haldane-Hubbard model to general bipartite lattices, arXiv:2503.09602 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    Zheng, H

    W. Zheng, H. Shen, Z. Wang, and H. Zhai, Magnetic- order-driven topological transition in the Haldane- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B91, 161107 (2015)

    2015

  30. [30]

    V. S. Arun, R. Sohal, C. Hickey, and A. Paramekanti, Mean field study of the topological Haldane-Hubbard model of spin- 1 2 fermions, Phys. Rev. B93, 115110 (2016)

    2016

  31. [31]

    J. Wu, J. P. L. Faye, D. S´ en´ echal, and J. Maciejko, Quantum cluster approach to the spinful Haldane- Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B93, 075131 (2016)

    2016

  32. [32]

    T. I. Vanhala, T. Siro, L. Liang, M. Troyer, A. Harju, and P. T¨ orm¨ a, Topological phase transitions in the repulsively interacting Haldane-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. Lett. 116, 225305 (2016)

    2016

  33. [33]

    Imriˇ ska, L

    J. Imriˇ ska, L. Wang, and M. Troyer, First-order topological phase transition of the Haldane-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B94, 035109 (2016)

    2016

  34. [34]

    Mertz, K

    T. Mertz, K. Zantout, and R. Valent´ ı, Statistical analysis of the Chern number in the interacting Haldane-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B100, 125111 (2019)

    2019

  35. [35]

    W.-X. He, R. Mondaini, H.-G. Luo, X. Wang, and S. Hu, Phase transitions in the Haldane-Hubbard model, Phys. Rev. B109, 035126 (2024)

    2024

  36. [36]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Model for a quantum Hall effect without Landau levels: condensed-matter realization of the ”parity anomaly”, Phys. Rev. Lett.61, 2015 (1988)

    2015

  37. [37]

    N. Hao, P. Zhang, Z. Wang, W. Zhang, and Y. Wang, Topological edge states and quantum Hall effect in the Haldane model, Phys. Rev. B78, 075438 (2008)

    2008

  38. [38]

    G. D. Mahan,Many-Particle Physcis(Plenum Press, New York, 1990)

    1990

  39. [39]

    Yu and Q

    R. Yu and Q. Si,U(1) slave-spin theory and its application to Mott transition in a multiorbital model for iron pnictides, Phys. Rev. B86, 085104 (2012)

    2012

  40. [40]

    Coleman, Mixed valence as an almost broken symmetry, Phys

    P. Coleman, Mixed valence as an almost broken symmetry, Phys. Rev. B35, 5072 (1987)

    1987

  41. [41]

    P. A. Lee and N. Nagaosa, Gauge theory of the normal state of high-Tc superconductors, Phys. Rev. B46, 5621 (1992)

    1992

  42. [42]

    S. Feng, J. B. Wu, Z. B. Su, and L. Yu, Slave-particle studies of the electron-momentum distribution in the low- dimensional t-J model, Phys. Rev. B47, 15192 (1993)

    1993

  43. [43]

    Florens and A

    S. Florens and A. Georges, Slave-rotor mean-field theories of strongly correlated systems and the Mott transition in finite dimensions, Phys. Rev. B70, 035114 (2004)

    2004

  44. [44]

    Senthil, Theory of a continuous Mott transition in two dimensions, Phys

    T. Senthil, Theory of a continuous Mott transition in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 045109 (2008)

    2008

  45. [45]

    S. R. Hassan and L. de’ Medici, Slave spins away from half filling: Cluster mean-field theory of the Hubbard and extended Hubbard models, Phys. Rev. B81, 035106 (2010)

    2010

  46. [46]

    Lee and T.-K

    W.-C. Lee and T.-K. Lee, Antiferromagnetism in the Hubbard model using a cluster slave-spin method, Phys. Rev. B96, 115114 (2017)

    2017

  47. [47]

    M.-H. Zeng, T. Ma, and Y.-J. Wang, Phase diagram of the Hubbard model on a square lattice: A cluster slave- spin study, Phys. Rev. B104, 094524 (2021)

    2021

  48. [48]

    Zeng, Y.-J

    M.-H. Zeng, Y.-J. Wang, and T. Ma, Phase diagram of the Hubbard model on a honeycomb lattice: A cluster slave-spin study, Phys. Rev. B105, 035155 (2022)

    2022

  49. [49]

    Odd-Parity Altermagnetism Originated from Orbital Orders

    Z.-Y. Zhuang, D. Zhu, D. Liu, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Odd- parity altermagnetism originated from orbital orders, arXiv:2508.18361 (2025)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  50. [50]

    Luo, J.-X

    X.-J. Luo, J.-X. Hu, and K. T. Law, Spin symmetry criteria for odd-parity magnets, arXiv:2510.05512 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  51. [51]

    D. Zhu, D. Liu, Z.-Y. Zhuang, Z. Wu, and Z. Yan, Light-induced even-parity unidirectional spin splitting in coplanar antiferromagnets, arXiv:2601.03358 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  52. [52]

    Kotliar and A

    G. Kotliar and A. E. Ruckenstein, New functional integral approach to strongly correlated Fermi systems: 10 the Gutzwiller approximation as a saddle point, Phys. Rev. Lett.57, 1362 (1986)

    1986

  53. [53]

    M. Zeng, X. Li, Y. Wang, and S. Feng, Microwave conductivity due to impurity scattering in cuprate superconductors, Phys. Rev. B108, 094505 (2023)

    2023

  54. [54]

    Z. Qiao, S. A. Yang, W. Feng, W.-K. Tse, J. Ding, Y. Yao, J. Wang, and Q. Niu, Quantum anomalous Hall effect in graphene from Rashba and exchange effects, Phys. Rev. B82, 161414 (2010)

    2010

  55. [55]

    M. Zeng, L. Qin, S. Feng, D.-H. Xu, and R. Wang, The spin Hall conductivity in the hole-doped bilayer Haldane- Hubbard model with odd-parity ALM, arXiv:2510.12602 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Zheng and H

    W. Zheng and H. Zhai, Floquet topological states in shaking optical lattices, Phys. Rev. A89, 061603 (2014)

    2014

  57. [57]

    Jotzu, M

    G. Jotzu, M. Messer, R. Desbuquois, M. Lebrat, T. Uehlinger, D. Greif, and T. Esslinger, Experimental realization of the topological Haldane model with ultracold fermions, Nature515, 237 (2014)

    2014

  58. [58]

    P. Das, V. Leeb, J. Knolle, and M. Knap, Realizing altermagnetism in Fermi-Hubbard models with ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 263402 (2024)

    2024

  59. [59]

    T. Zhu, D. Zhou, H. Wang, S.-H. Wei, and J. Ruan, Floquet odd-parity collinear magnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 136, 126704 (2026)

    2026

  60. [60]

    Huang, Z

    S. Huang, Z. Qin, F. Zhan, D.-H. Xu, D.-S. Ma, and R. Wang, Light-induced odd-parity magnetism in conventional antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. Lett.136, 126703 (2026)

    2026