Structural Results for 4 x n Chomp: Unique Extension, Bimodal Asymptotic Structure, and Period-112 Geometry
Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 10:12 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
In 4-row Chomp, any three row lengths extend to at most one P-position, and the positions form two distinct asymptotic families.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
We prove the Unique Extension property: for any triple (a,b,c), there is at most one value of d such that (a,b,c,d) is a P-position. The P-positions exhibit a persistent bimodal decomposition into HIGH and LOW subfamilies separated by a clean gap in the per-a median of d/a. Within each family the two larger row-length ratios satisfy an exact quadratic relation at machine precision.
What carries the argument
The unique extension property proved by short contradiction using the move structure of Chomp
If this is right
- The unique extension generalizes immediately to all k-row Chomp.
- The global limit d/a -> 2/9 is a mixture artifact of the two families.
- Numerical evidence suggests d/a -> 1/4 in the HIGH family and L3 ~ 0.183 in the LOW family.
- The HIGH subfamily maintains a stable density of 56.2%.
- The gap in median d/a grows monotonically from 0.040 at n=500 to 0.062 at n=3000.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- The exact quadratic relations may reflect an algebraic identity hidden in the definition of P-positions.
- Further computation beyond n=3000 could distinguish between 1/4 and the fitted asymptote of 0.248 for the HIGH limit.
- Similar bimodal structures might exist in other row-based impartial games like subtraction games.
- The shadow-array sieve could be adapted to compute P-positions in higher-row variants more efficiently.
Load-bearing premise
The shadow-array sieve correctly computes all P-positions without omissions or errors for n up to 3000.
What would settle it
A single counterexample triple (a,b,c) with two distinct d values both yielding P-positions would falsify the unique extension property.
Figures
read the original abstract
We present a complete computational tabulation of all 961,619,972 P-positions in 4xn Chomp for n <= 3000, obtained via a new O(n^4) shadow-array sieve that replaces the O(n^5) hash-set approach of prior work. Three structural results are reported. First, we prove the Unique Extension property: for any triple (a,b,c), there is at most one value of d such that (a,b,c,d) is a P-position. The proof is a short contradiction using the move structure of Chomp and generalizes immediately to all k-row Chomp. Second, the P-positions exhibit a persistent bimodal decomposition into two subfamilies, HIGH and LOW, separated by a clean gap in the per-a median of d/a that grows monotonically from 0.040 at n=500 to 0.062 at n=3000, with the HIGH subfamily maintaining a stable density of 56.2% throughout. The previously conjectured global limit d/a -> 2/9 is shown to be a mixture artifact. Third, within each family the two larger row-length ratios satisfy an exact quadratic relation at machine precision, and numerical evidence suggests d/a -> 1/4 in the HIGH family, though a power-law convergence fit gives an asymptote of approximately 0.248 with exponent alpha ~ 0.05, leaving the exact limit open. The LOW family limit L3 ~ 0.183 is not well approximated by 3/16; the best rational with denominator at most 2000 is 20/109. Code and the n <= 500 dataset are available at https://github.com/gargarnav/chomp-4xn-v2.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports a complete tabulation of all 961,619,972 P-positions in 4xn Chomp for n ≤ 3000, computed via a new O(n^4) shadow-array sieve. It proves the Unique Extension property—that for any triple (a,b,c) there is at most one d making (a,b,c,d) a P-position—via a short contradiction argument based on Chomp move structure, which generalizes to arbitrary k-row Chomp. It further identifies a persistent bimodal decomposition of P-positions into HIGH and LOW subfamilies separated by a monotonically growing gap in median d/a (0.040 at n=500 to 0.062 at n=3000), with HIGH maintaining ~56.2% density; this decomposition shows that the previously conjectured global d/a → 2/9 limit is a mixture artifact. Within each subfamily the two larger row-length ratios satisfy an exact quadratic relation at machine precision, with numerical evidence and power-law fits suggesting d/a → ~0.248 (HIGH) and L3 ~ 0.183 (LOW). Code and the n ≤ 500 dataset are provided at a public repository.
Significance. If the results hold, the Unique Extension theorem is a load-bearing structural advance that applies immediately to all finite-row Chomp and supplies a new tool for analyzing P-position geometry in impartial games. The bimodal decomposition and explicit refutation of the 2/9 conjecture, grounded in exhaustive enumeration rather than prior parameter fits, open concrete avenues for asymptotic analysis. The availability of both the O(n^4) implementation and a verifiable n ≤ 500 subset constitutes a reproducible computational contribution that strengthens the observational claims.
minor comments (3)
- [Quadratic relations] In the description of the quadratic relations, state the precise quadratic equation satisfied by the ratios and the floating-point tolerance used to declare it 'exact at machine precision' (e.g., 10^{-12}).
- [Bimodal decomposition] The reported HIGH-family density of 56.2% should specify whether this is an average over all n ≤ 3000 or a stabilized value for large n; a short table of density versus n would clarify stability.
- [Asymptotic analysis] The power-law fit for the HIGH-family asymptote (0.248 with exponent ~0.05) should report the fitting range of n, the least-squares method, and residual statistics so readers can assess convergence quality.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for the positive assessment of the manuscript and the recommendation to accept. The summary accurately captures the Unique Extension theorem, the bimodal HIGH/LOW decomposition, the refutation of the 2/9 conjecture, and the O(n^4) computational method.
Circularity Check
No significant circularity identified
full rationale
The Unique Extension property is proven by an explicit short contradiction argument that relies only on the move structure of Chomp and does not reference the computational tabulation or any fitted quantities. The bimodal decomposition into HIGH and LOW subfamilies, the observed gap growth, stable density, quadratic relations at machine precision, and suggested asymptotic limits are all presented as direct empirical observations extracted from the n ≤ 3000 dataset generated by the shadow-array sieve; the authors supply both the O(n^4) implementation and the n ≤ 500 data at a public repository, allowing independent verification of completeness in the regime where the structural patterns first appear. No load-bearing step reduces by definition, by renaming a fitted input as a prediction, or by a self-citation chain whose cited result itself depends on the present claims; the derivation chain therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (3)
- HIGH subfamily density =
56.2%
- HIGH family d/a asymptote =
0.248
- LOW family L3 limit =
0.183
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Chomp moves consist of removing a rectangle from the top-right, preserving the bottom-left as the terminal position.
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/Breath1024.leaneight-tick periodic micro-structure echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
period-112 = lcm(7,8)×2 ... period-8 signal of currently unknown origin. The solver uses 16-bit field encoding, ruling out the period-8 as a bitpacking artifact.
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction echoes?
echoesECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.
Unique Extension property: for any triple (a,b,c), there is at most one value of d such that (a,b,c,d) is a P-position. The proof is a short contradiction using the move structure of Chomp and generalizes immediately to all k-row Chomp.
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Unique Winning Opening Move in Three-Row Chomp
Every 3 x n Chomp rectangle has exactly one winning opening move.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
E. Berlekamp, J. H. Conway, and R. K. Guy,Winning Ways for Your Mathematical Plays, 2nd ed., A K Peters, 2001
work page 2001
-
[2]
A. E. Brouwer, G. Horv´ ath, I. Moln´ ar-S´ aska, and C. Szab´ o, “On three-rowed Chomp,” Integers: Electronic Journal of Combinatorial Number Theory, vol. 5, no. 1, 2005, #G07
work page 2005
-
[3]
D. Gale, “A curious Nim-type game,”American Mathematical Monthly, vol. 81, pp. 876– 879, 1974
work page 1974
-
[4]
Mathematical Games: Sim, Chomp and Race Track,
M. Gardner, “Mathematical Games: Sim, Chomp and Race Track,”Scientific American, vol. 228, no. 1, January 1973, pp. 108–115
work page 1973
-
[5]
D. Zeilberger, “Three-rowed Chomp,”Advances in Applied Mathematics, vol. 26, pp. 168– 179, 2001. 7
work page 2001
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.