pith. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27902 · v1 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

The Complex Structure of the Abell 548 - Abell 3367 Region

Mark J. Henriksen , Layla Ahmed This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 07:22 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords superclustergalaxy clustersX-ray sourceslarge-scale structurefilamentgalaxy groupsredshiftAbell clusters
0
0 comments X

The pith

X-ray observations indicate Abell 548 and Abell 3367 are part of a supercluster with three clusters at redshifts 0.04 to 0.06.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes archival X-ray data from XMM and ROSAT along with galaxy redshifts to explore the structure of the Abell 548-Abell 3367 region, which optical studies have left unclear regarding their connection. It identifies a rich X-ray structure with extended sources forming galaxy groups and clusters, some aligned in a way that suggests a filament. Evidence emerges for a supercluster including clusters at redshifts near 0.04, 0.045, and 0.06, with redshift matches confirming physical links and identifying some sources as background. This reveals how groups in the large-scale structure allow galaxy interactions to begin before reaching dense cluster environments.

Core claim

We use archival XMM and ROSAT X-ray data together with kinematic data of counterpart galaxies to address the connection between Abell 3367 and Abell 548 and to determine the structure in this region. The region is particularly rich in X-ray structure elongated along a SW-NE axis consisting of numerous extended X-ray sources. In general, the structure consists of many galaxy groups and clusters which appear segregated in X-ray luminosity with the least luminous toward the outer region of the clusters, possibly tracing a filament. We find evidence to suggest a supercluster of 3 clusters at redshifts ∼0.04, 0.045, and 0.06. Some of the X-ray sources coincident with Abell 3367 have counterpart 0

What carries the argument

X-ray imaging of extended sources paired with galaxy redshift data to establish physical associations and trace filaments in the cosmic web.

Load-bearing premise

That the positional coincidence of X-ray sources with galaxy clusters and the matching of their redshifts indicate a true physical association rather than projection effects or chance alignments.

What would settle it

Spectroscopic measurements of many more galaxies showing inconsistent redshifts or velocities between the X-ray sources and the proposed cluster members would challenge the supercluster interpretation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27902 by Layla Ahmed, Mark J. Henriksen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: There are 481 galaxies detected with WISEA that have catalogued redshifts in the examined regions of Abell 548–Abell 3367. The colors correspond to the regions analyzed in the X-Ray band: Abell 548-A (blue), Abell 548-B (yellow), Abell 548-C (orange), and Abell 3367 (purple). In this paper, we analyze archival X-Ray and optical–infrared data to better determine the substructure in this complex region view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Extended sources (green crosses) overlaid on the smoothed RASS of the Abell 548–Abell 3367 region. The large circular regions are those used to extract sources from the XMM, ROSAT pointed, and RASS catalogs. 2. X-Ray Data We used catalogued XMM serendipitous sources and ROSAT sources from both pointed and survey observations, as this is the existing X-Ray coverage of the Abell 548–Abell 3367 region. Four c… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Abell 548-A sources view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Abell 548-B sources view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Abell 548-C sources view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: shows the luminosity histogram of the sources in the Abell 3367 region. The majority are above log(Lx) = 43 and significantly higher than the Abell 548 sources. The data consist of faint RASS sources and RASS point sources. The point source resolution was 200 kpc at the redshift of Abell 3367, which implies that the sources could be as large as groups. The higher luminosity could be due to the fact that th… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Luminosity distributions of all detected sources, showing a large spread in luminosity with a concentration at Log(Lx) = 41.5 view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: compares the distribution of the X-Ray sources to a sample of galaxy groups [28]. These galaxy groups were chosen because they have a similar range of X-Ray luminosities compared to the extended X-Ray sources. The comparison sample consisted of approximately 75% detections of diffuse group X-Ray emissions and 25% upper limits distributed from Log(Lx) ~40–42. Group X-Ray luminosities ranged from those compa… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Abell 548-B (L) and Abell 548-A (R) sources compared to groups of galaxies. While the Abell 548-A sources match up well with the groups, the Abell 548-B sources are shifted significantly to lower X-Ray luminosity. The lower sources are preferentially found in the cluster outskirts view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The location of X-Ray sources on the sky. Rectangles show the general area of sources plotted in adjoining panels. The locations on the sky are combined with redshift information to determine whether the sources are part of larger structures view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Left panel: sources 21–24; right panel: sources 3–11 view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: shows the Abell 548-C sources which bridge the Abell 548-A and -B sources in X-Ray luminosity. Of the three X-Ray sources, two are consistent with the rather low Abell 548-B luminosities and one is consistent with the higher Abell 548-A luminosities. All three are consistent with typical group luminosity view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison between Abell 3367 sources detected with RASS and groups of galaxies. The luminosities are towards the high end of the groups. Because the RASS observations are short, these high-luminosity sources are likely selected view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Histogram of counterpart galaxy redshifts. Four distinct structures in redshift are apparent at 0.045, 0.06, 0.103, and 0.26. The separation of Z ~0.103 bin X-Ray sources in the sky is 11.3 Mpc. This structure consists of X-Ray source x12, with 13 counterpart galaxies, and x28, with two counterpart galaxies. Source x28 has a log (Lx) of 42.92, which is at the high end of the galaxy groups. Thus, they may … view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: The horizontal line is at six counterpart galaxies. The vertical line is at X-Ray luminosity of 1041 ergs s−1 . Most of the X-Ray sources with just a few galaxies have low luminosity. All of the X-Ray sources with more than five counterparts have higher luminosity. This indicates that a higher number of counterparts is associated with higher X-Ray emission, consistent with the X-Ray source being associate… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Archival XMM and ROSAT X-ray data are used to investigate the structure of the Abell 548 - Abell 3367 region. Based on previous optical studies, this is a region likely to be rich in structure though studies are in disagreement regarding the connection between Abell 3367 and Abell 548. We use the available archival X-ray data together with kinematic data of counterpart galaxies to address this question and to determine the structure in this region. The region is particularly rich in X-ray structure elongated along a SW-NE axis consisting of numerous extended X-ray sources. In general, the structure consists of many galaxy groups and clusters which appear segregated in X-ray luminosity with the least luminous $\sim$ 30% toward the outer region of the clusters, possibly tracing a filament. We find evidence to suggest a supercluster of 3 clusters at redshifts: $\sim$ 0.04, 0.045, and 0.06. Some of the X-ray sources coincident with Abell 3367 have counterpart galaxy redshifts consistent with Abell 548 and others are significantly higher. This supports that Abell 548 and Abell 3667, form a supercluser and the higher redshift X-ray source is a background object. They are part of a larger structure consisting of a previously identified cluster at redshift 0.04, and two groups at redshift $\sim$ 0.06. In addition, there is a filamentary structure at z $\sim$ 0.103. The ubiquity of groups in the large scale structure suggests that they provide an environment where galaxies are in close proximity and evolution via interaction can proceed well before the galaxies make their way into the dense central region of a cluster.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript analyzes archival XMM-Newton and ROSAT X-ray observations of the Abell 548–Abell 3367 region together with available galaxy redshift data. It identifies an elongated complex of extended X-ray sources along a SW-NE axis, interprets many as galaxy groups and clusters, and uses positional coincidences plus redshift matches to argue that Abell 548, Abell 3367, and a third system at z ≈ 0.06 form a supercluster, with some X-ray sources being background objects; an additional filament at z ≈ 0.103 is noted. The work concludes that groups are ubiquitous in large-scale structure and provide sites for galaxy interactions prior to cluster assembly.

Significance. If the reported associations prove physical, the results would supply a concrete multi-wavelength case study of supercluster assembly and filamentary structure in a nearby region, reinforcing the role of galaxy groups as early sites of galaxy evolution. The archival approach demonstrates the continuing value of re-analyzing existing X-ray and optical data for complex fields, though the largely qualitative nature of the associations limits immediate broader impact on cosmological simulations or statistical studies of the cosmic web.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section on X-ray sources coincident with Abell 3367 and redshift matches] The headline claim that Abell 548, Abell 3367 and a third system at z ≈ 0.06 constitute a supercluster rests on positional matches between X-ray sources and optically identified galaxies whose redshifts fall near the cluster values. No Monte-Carlo simulation, Poisson probability calculation, or other chance-alignment test is presented that folds in the observed surface density of X-ray detections, the redshift distribution of galaxies with measured velocities, and the adopted positional tolerance. This omission is load-bearing because the field is described as elongated and rich in both extended X-ray sources and galaxies with redshifts; without the test the physical-association step remains unquantified (see the paragraphs discussing X-ray sources coincident with Abell 3367 and the redshift matches).
  2. [Paragraph describing X-ray luminosity segregation and filament tracing] The statement that galaxy groups and clusters “appear segregated in X-ray luminosity with the least luminous ∼30% toward the outer region of the clusters, possibly tracing a filament” lacks any description of the parent sample, the precise luminosity threshold used to define the “least luminous 30%,” the method of background subtraction or flux measurement, or the uncertainties on the X-ray luminosities. Without these details the filamentary interpretation cannot be evaluated and the claim is not reproducible from the data presented.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains two typographical errors: “Abell 3667” should read “Abell 3367” and “supercluser” should read “supercluster.”
  2. [Throughout the text] Redshift values are given inconsistently (∼0.04 versus 0.045 versus ∼0.06); a uniform notation and explicit listing of the exact redshift values and uncertainties for each identified system would improve clarity.
  3. [Tables and figures] Any tables or figures that list X-ray source positions, fluxes, or associated galaxy redshifts should include detection significances, positional uncertainties, and the number of galaxies contributing to each redshift.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive report on our manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, providing clarifications and indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Section on X-ray sources coincident with Abell 3367 and redshift matches] The headline claim that Abell 548, Abell 3367 and a third system at z ≈ 0.06 constitute a supercluster rests on positional matches between X-ray sources and optically identified galaxies whose redshifts fall near the cluster values. No Monte-Carlo simulation, Poisson probability calculation, or other chance-alignment test is presented that folds in the observed surface density of X-ray detections, the redshift distribution of galaxies with measured velocities, and the adopted positional tolerance. This omission is load-bearing because the field is described as elongated and rich in both extended X-ray sources and galaxies with redshifts; without the test the physical-association step remains unquantified (see the paragraphs discussing X-ray sources coincident with Abell 3367 and the redshift matches).

    Authors: We agree that a quantitative test for the probability of chance alignments would strengthen the physical-association argument. Our conclusions draw on the joint evidence of extended X-ray morphology, positional coincidence with galaxy overdensities, and redshift matches within narrow slices around the known cluster redshifts (z ≈ 0.04, 0.045, 0.06). Nevertheless, to address the referee’s concern we will add a Monte Carlo or Poisson probability calculation in the revised manuscript that incorporates the observed surface density of X-ray sources, the redshift distribution of galaxies with measured velocities, and the adopted positional tolerance. This will provide a numerical measure of the significance of the reported associations. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Paragraph describing X-ray luminosity segregation and filament tracing] The statement that galaxy groups and clusters “appear segregated in X-ray luminosity with the least luminous ∼30% toward the outer region of the clusters, possibly tracing a filament” lacks any description of the parent sample, the precise luminosity threshold used to define the “least luminous 30%,” the method of background subtraction or flux measurement, or the uncertainties on the X-ray luminosities. Without these details the filamentary interpretation cannot be evaluated and the claim is not reproducible from the data presented.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the current description of the X-ray luminosity segregation is insufficiently detailed for reproducibility. In the revised manuscript we will expand the relevant paragraph to specify: (i) the parent sample of extended X-ray sources, (ii) the exact luminosity threshold that isolates the least luminous 30 %, (iii) the background-subtraction and flux-measurement procedures (including the assumed spectral model and any aperture corrections), and (iv) the estimated uncertainties on the derived luminosities. We will also clarify how the “outer region” of the clusters was defined for the segregation analysis, thereby allowing readers to assess the filamentary interpretation directly from the data. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in observational structure mapping

full rationale

The manuscript is a purely observational analysis of archival XMM/ROSAT X-ray imaging combined with existing galaxy redshift catalogs. Structure identification proceeds by direct positional coincidence of extended X-ray sources with optically identified clusters plus redshift matching; no equations, fitted parameters, ansatzes, or uniqueness theorems are introduced. The central claim (supercluster at z ≈ 0.04–0.06) is therefore an empirical interpretation of the data rather than a derived quantity that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No self-citation chains or renamings of known results appear in the provided text, so the derivation chain is self-contained and scores 0.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard domain assumptions in X-ray cluster astronomy rather than new free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Extended X-ray emission traces the hot intracluster medium in galaxy groups and clusters
    Invoked when associating X-ray sources with Abell clusters and groups throughout the abstract.
  • domain assumption Galaxy redshifts can be used to determine physical association and distance in the expanding universe
    Used to assign sources to the 0.04, 0.045, 0.06, and 0.103 redshift slices and to identify background objects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5625 in / 1550 out tokens · 86323 ms · 2026-05-07T07:22:13.877676+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 41 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Where are the Baryons? Astrophys

    Cen, R.; Ostriker, J.P . Where are the Baryons? Astrophys. J. 1999, 514, 1. [CrossRef]

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Linking cluster formation to large-scale structure

    Colberg, J.M.; White, S.D.M.; Jenkins, A.; Pearce, F.R. Linking cluster formation to large-scale structure. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 1999, 308, 593. [CrossRef]

    work page 1999

  3. [3]

    Alignments of Brightest Cluster Galaxies with Large-Scale Structures.Astron

    Lambas, D.; Groth, E.; Peebles, P .J.E. Alignments of Brightest Cluster Galaxies with Large-Scale Structures.Astron. J. 1988, 95, 996. [CrossRef]

    work page 1988

  4. [4]

    Alignments of the Dominant Galaxies in Poor Clusters

    Fuller, T.; West, M.J.; Bridges, T. Alignments of the Dominant Galaxies in Poor Clusters. Astrophys. J. 1999, 519, 22. [CrossRef]

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    The Challenge of Detecting Intracluster Filaments with Faraday Rotation

    Locatelli, N.; Vazza, F.; Domínguez-Fernández, P . The Challenge of Detecting Intracluster Filaments with Faraday Rotation. Galaxies 2018, 6, 128. [CrossRef]

    work page 2018

  6. [6]

    Probing the cosmic web: Intercluster filament detection using gravitational lensing

    Mead, J.M.G.; King, L.J.; McCarthy, I.G. Probing the cosmic web: Intercluster filament detection using gravitational lensing. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2010, 401, 2257–2267. [CrossRef]

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Detection of hot gas in the filament connecting the clusters of galaxies Abell 222 and Abell 223

    Werner, N.; Finoguenov, A.; Kaastra, J.S.; Simionescu, A.; Dietrich, J.P .; Vink, J.; Böhringer, H. Detection of hot gas in the filament connecting the clusters of galaxies Abell 222 and Abell 223. Astron. Astrophys. 2008, 482, L29.:200809599. [CrossRef] Astronomy 2024, 3 302

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    First detection of stacked X-Ray emission from cosmic web filaments

    Tanimura, H.; Aghanim, N.; Kolodzig, A.; Douspis, M.; Malavasi, N. First detection of stacked X-Ray emission from cosmic web filaments. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 643, L2. [CrossRef]

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Identification of filamentary structures in the environment of superclusters of galaxies in the Local Universe

    Santiago-Bautista, I.; Caretta, C.A.; Bravo-Alfaro, H.; Pointecouteau, E.; Andernach, H. Identification of filamentary structures in the environment of superclusters of galaxies in the Local Universe. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 637, A31. [CrossRef]

    work page 2020

  10. [10]

    Planck Collaboration, Planck intermediate results

    Ade, P .A.R.; Aghanim, N.; Arnaud, M.; Ashdown, M.; Atrio-Barandela, F.; Aumont, J.; Baccigalupi, C.; Balbi, A.; Banday, A.J.; Barreiro, R.B.; et al. Planck Collaboration, Planck intermediate results. VIII. Filaments between interacting clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 550, A134. [CrossRef]

    work page 2013

  11. [11]

    Galaxy Cluster Baryon Fractions Revisited.Astrophys

    Gonzalez, A.H.; Sivanandam, S.; Zabludoff, A.I.; Zaritsky , D. Galaxy Cluster Baryon Fractions Revisited.Astrophys. J. 2013, 778, 14. [CrossRef]

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    X-Ray Detection of the Galaxy’s Missing Baryons in the Circumgalactic Medium of L* Galaxies.Astrophys

    Nicastro, F.; Krongold, Y .; Fang, T.; Fraternali, F.; Mathur, S.; Bianchi, S.; Rosa, A.D.; Piconcelli, E.; Zappacosta1, L.; Bischetti, M.; et al. X-Ray Detection of the Galaxy’s Missing Baryons in the Circumgalactic Medium of L* Galaxies.Astrophys. J. Lett. 2023, 955, L1. [CrossRef]

    work page 2023

  13. [13]

    The Distribution of Nearby Rich Clusters of Galaxies.Astrophys

    Postman, M.; Huchra, J.P .; Geller, M.J. The Distribution of Nearby Rich Clusters of Galaxies.Astrophys. J. 1992, 384, 404. [CrossRef]

    work page 1992

  14. [14]

    Vettolani, G

    Zucca, E.; Zamorani, G.; Scaramella, R. Vettolani, G. All-Sky Catalogs of Superclusters of Abell-ACO Clusters. Astrophys. J. 1993, 407, 470. [CrossRef]

    work page 1993

  15. [15]

    A redshift survey between the clusters of galaxies A 548 and A 3367

    Andreuzzi, G.; Bardelli, S.; Scaramella, R.; Zucca, E. A redshift survey between the clusters of galaxies A 548 and A 3367. Astron. Astrophys. 1998, 337, 17

    work page 1998

  16. [16]

    Brightest Cluster Galaxies as Standard Candles

    Postman, M.; Lauer, T. Brightest Cluster Galaxies as Standard Candles. Astrophys. J. 1995, 440, 28. [CrossRef]

    work page 1995

  17. [17]

    The XMM-Newton Serendipitous Survey

    Webb, N.A.; Coriat, M.; Traulsen, I.; Ballet, J.; Motch, C.; Carrera, F.J.; Koliopanos, F.; Authier, J.; de Calle, I.; Ceballos, M.T.; et al. The XMM-Newton Serendipitous Survey. Astron. Astrophys. 2020, 641, 136. [CrossRef]

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    HI4PI: A full-sky Hi survey based on EBHIS and GASS

    Bekhti, N.B.; Flöer, L.; Keller, R.; Kerp, J.; Lenz, D.; Winkel, B.; Bailin, J.; Calabretta, M.R.; Dedes, L.; Ford, H.A.; et al. HI4PI: A full-sky Hi survey based on EBHIS and GASS. Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 594, 116. [CrossRef]

    work page 2016

  19. [19]

    A Compilation of Redshifts and Velocity Dispersions for ACO Clusters.Astrophys

    Struble, M.F.; Rood, H.J. A Compilation of Redshifts and Velocity Dispersions for ACO Clusters.Astrophys. J. Suppl. Ser. 1999, 125, 35. [CrossRef]

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    A Cosmology Calculator for the World Wide Web

    Wright, E.L. A Cosmology Calculator for the World Wide Web. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 2006, 118, 1711. [CrossRef]

    work page 2006

  21. [21]

    IAU Circ

    White, N.E.; Giommi, P .; Angelini, L. IAU Circ. No. 6100, 1994

    work page 1994

  22. [22]

    Second ROSAT all-sky survey (2RXS) source catalogue

    Boller, T.; Freyberg, M.J.; Trümper, J.; Haberl, F.; Voges, W.; Nandra, K. Second ROSAT all-sky survey (2RXS) source catalogue. Astron. Astrophys. 2016, 588, A103. . [CrossRef]

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    Galaxy Cluster Baryon Fractions Revisited

    Ebeling, H.; Voges, W.; Bohringer, H. Galaxy Cluster Baryon Fractions Revisited. Astrophys. J. 1994, 436, 44. [CrossRef]

    work page 1994

  24. [24]

    X-Ray observations of the edge-on star-forming galaxy NGC 891 and its supernova SN1986J

    Temple, R.F.; Raychaudhury, S.; Stevens, I.R. X-Ray observations of the edge-on star-forming galaxy NGC 891 and its supernova SN1986J. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2005, 362, 581. [CrossRef]

    work page 2005

  25. [25]

    IAU Circ

    Voges, W.; et al. IAU Circ. No. 7432, 2000

    work page 2000

  26. [26]

    Wise Report, 2013, 1c

    Cutri, R.M.; et al. Wise Report, 2013, 1c

    work page 2013

  27. [27]

    High density of active galactic nuclei in the outskirts of distant galaxy clusters

    Koulouridis, E.; Bartalucci, I. High density of active galactic nuclei in the outskirts of distant galaxy clusters. Astron. Astrophys. 2019, 623, L10. [CrossRef]

    work page 2019

  28. [28]

    The Intragroup Medium in Poor Groups of Galaxies.Astrophys

    Mulchaey, J.S.; Davis, D.S.; Mushotzky, R.F.; Burstein, D. The Intragroup Medium in Poor Groups of Galaxies.Astrophys. J. 1996, 456, 80. [CrossRef]

    work page 1996

  29. [29]

    A Catalog of 1268 Radial Velocities in 15 Rich Clusters

    Dressler, A.; Schectman, S.A. A Catalog of 1268 Radial Velocities in 15 Rich Clusters. Astron. J. 1988, 95, 284. [CrossRef]

    work page 1988

  30. [30]

    The Morphology-Density Relation in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

    Goto, T.; Yamauchi, C.; Fujita, Y.; Okamura, S.; Sekiguchi, M.; Smail, I.; Bernardi, M.; Gomez, P .L. The Morphology-Density Relation in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2003, 346, 601. [CrossRef]

    work page 2003

  31. [31]

    The galaxy morphology–density relation in the EAGLE simulation

    Pfeffer, J.; Cavanagh, M.; Bekki, K.; Couch, W.J.; Drinkwater, M.J.; Forbes, D.A.; Koribalski, B. The galaxy morphology–density relation in the EAGLE simulation. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2023, 518, 5260–5278. [CrossRef]

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    The XMM-Newton 2dF Survey—I

    Georgakakis, A.; Georgantopoulos, I.; Stewart, G.C.; Shanks, T.; Boyle, B.J. The XMM-Newton 2dF Survey—I. X-Ray Properties of Normal Galaxies. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2003. 344, 161. [CrossRef]

    work page 2003

  33. [33]

    Optically selected fossil groups; X-Ray observations and galaxy properties

    Khosroshahi, H.G.; Gozaliasl, G.; Rasmussen, J.; Molaeinezhad, A.; Ponman, T.; Dariush, A.A.S.; Sanderson, A.J. Optically selected fossil groups; X-Ray observations and galaxy properties. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2014, 443, 318. [CrossRef]

    work page 2014

  34. [34]

    A Filament between Galaxy Clusters A3391 and A3395

    Tittley Eric, R.; Henriksen Mark, J. A Filament between Galaxy Clusters A3391 and A3395. Astrophys. J. 2001, 563, 673. [CrossRef]

    work page 2001

  35. [35]

    Chandra and XMM-Newton Observations of the Abell 3395/Abell 3391 Intercluster Filament

    Alvarez, G.E.; R.; Randall, S.W.; Bourdin, H.; Jones, C.; Holley-Bockelmann, K. Chandra and XMM-Newton Observations of the Abell 3395/Abell 3391 Intercluster Filament. Astrophys. J. 2018, 858, 44. [CrossRef]

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    Suzaku observations of the outskirts of the galaxy cluster Abell 3395, including a filament toward Abell 3391

    Sugawara, Y.; Takizawa, M.; Itahana, M.; Akamatsu, H.; Fujita, Y.; Ohashi, T.; Ishisaki, Y. Suzaku observations of the outskirts of the galaxy cluster Abell 3395, including a filament toward Abell 3391. Publ. Astron. Soc. Jpn. 2017, 69, 93. [CrossRef]

    work page 2017

  37. [37]

    The Assembly of Galaxy Clusters.Astrophys

    Berrier, J.C.; Stewart, K.R.; Bullock, J.S.; Purcell, C.W.; Barton, E.J.; Wechsler, R.H. The Assembly of Galaxy Clusters.Astrophys. J. 2009, 690, 1292. [CrossRef]

    work page 2009

  38. [38]

    The accretion of galaxies into groups and clusters

    McGee, S.L.; Balogh, M.L.; Bower, R.G.; Font, A.S.; McCarthy, I.G. The accretion of galaxies into groups and clusters. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2009, 400, 937. [CrossRef]

    work page 2009

  39. [39]

    Quenching of Star Formation in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Groups: Centrals, Satellites, and Galactic Conformity

    Knobel, C.; Lilly, S.J.; Woo, J.; Kovaˇ c, K. Quenching of Star Formation in Sloan Digital Sky Survey Groups: Centrals, Satellites, and Galactic Conformity. Astrophys. J. 2015, 800, 24. [CrossRef] Astronomy 2024, 3 303

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    The Origin of Intergalactic Light in Compact Groups of Galaxies

    Henriksen, M.J. The Origin of Intergalactic Light in Compact Groups of Galaxies. Universe 2021, 7, 303. [CrossRef]

    work page 2021

  41. [41]

    A Fast Radio Burst in a Compact Galaxy Group at z~1

    Gordon, A.; Fong, We.; Simha, S.; Dong, Y.; Kilpatrick, C.D.; Deller, A.T.; Ryder, S.D.; Eftekhari, T.; Glowacki, M.; Marnoch, L.; et al. A Fast Radio Burst in a Compact Galaxy Group at z~1. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2311.10815v1. [CrossRef] Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the indivi...

    work page arXiv 2023