pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2604.27954 · v2 · submitted 2026-04-30 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Recognition: unknown

Axion dark matter from extended misalignment with a constant-ω_φ pre-oscillatory phase and dark radiation

Jos\'e Mar\'ia P\'erez-Poyatos
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 03:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords axion-like particlesmisalignment mechanismdark radiationcosmological tensionsBayesian analysisequation of statesymmetry breaking scale
0
0 comments X

The pith

Cosmological data constrain an extended axion-like particle model to specific mass and scale ranges without easing H0 or S8 tensions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper extends the standard misalignment production mechanism for axion-like particles by introducing an early phase where the field has a constant equation of state set by a tracking potential. After a rapid switch to the usual cosine potential during the radiation era, the particle can enter a kinetic misalignment regime before oscillating. The authors also allow the particle to decay into dark radiation and use current data to perform a Bayesian fit. They find that the dark radiation component does not ease the Hubble or clustering tensions, but the data do restrict the allowed values of the equation of state parameter and the particle's mass and decay constant.

Core claim

By introducing a constant-ω_ϕ pre-oscillatory phase via a tracking potential that transitions rapidly to the cosine form, and coupling the ALP to dark radiation, the model is subjected to Bayesian constraints from cosmological data. These constraints favor negative ω_ϕ and restrict the symmetry-breaking scale f_ϕ to [80, 1.5×10^{10}] TeV (m_ϕ ∈ [10^{-20}, 10^{-2}] eV), while showing that the resulting dark radiation does not resolve the H_0 or S_8 tensions.

What carries the argument

A tracking potential maintaining constant equation of state ω_ϕ before a rapid transition to the cosine potential, which drives the axion-like particle into kinetic misalignment and allows decay into dark radiation.

If this is right

  • Negative values of the pre-oscillatory equation of state are preferred by the data.
  • The symmetry-breaking scale is restricted to between 80 and 1.5×10^{10} TeV.
  • Corresponding axion-like particle masses lie between 10^{-20} and 10^{-2} eV.
  • The dark radiation produced does not alleviate cosmological tensions in the Hubble constant or S8 parameter.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This framework could be generalized to other scalar fields with similar tracking potentials in the early universe.
  • The preference for negative ω_ϕ might point to a particular shape of the tracking potential that deserves further theoretical study.
  • Constraints on ultra-light axion-like particles in this mass window have implications for structure formation that future galaxy surveys could test.

Load-bearing premise

The transition from the tracking potential to the cosine potential happens rapidly enough in the radiation-dominated era to produce kinetic misalignment without extra parameters or smooth-transition effects.

What would settle it

Future cosmological data that measure a dark radiation density or Hubble constant value incompatible with the allowed ranges for negative ω_ϕ and the stated f_ϕ interval would falsify the model's consistency with observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2604.27954 by Jos\'e Mar\'ia P\'erez-Poyatos.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Several proposed misalignment mechanisms and their corresponding parameter view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Left: ALP potential as shown in Eqs. (1), (2) and (25). Right: Evolution of the ALP field across the different regimes. The blue curve shows the exact solution of Eq. (20) for the potential in panel (a), while the orange curve shows the approximate solution. The close agreement between the two curves justifies the approximations we employed. 1. rϕ < 1. In this case the ALP does not have enough energy densi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Left: Comparison between the evolution of DM in the ALP model for a selected values of Γϕ and ΛCDM. The vertical dashed lines represent the moment when the ALP coupling to DR becomes effective. Right: Hubble parameter as a function of the scale factor in the ALP model for the selected values of Γϕ. The Hubble parameter is obtained using the ‘shooting’ method implemented in CLASS. In both cases, the rest of… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: Allowed region in the mϕ– fϕ plane consistent with view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Induced changes in the CMB temperature power spectrum in the ALP model for selected values of Γϕ. The rest of the parameters are fixed to those in view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Same as in Fig view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Posteriors on H0 and S8, as well as the ωϕ, log10 rϕ, log10 fϕ/MP , log10 aosc and log10 Γϕ parameters for ALP decaying model analysis. 43 view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In this work, we extend the standard pre-inflationary misalignment mechanism for axion-like particles (ALPs) by introducing a pre-oscillatory phase with constant equation of state $\omega_\phi\in[-1,1]$, generated by a tracking potential. During the radiation-dominated era, the potential undergoes a rapid transition to the conventional cosine potential. The resulting change in the potential energy across the transition can drive the ALP into a kinetic misalignment phase ($\omega_\phi=1$) prior to the onset of oscillations. Motivated by persistent cosmological tensions, such as those in $H_0$ and $S_8$, we also investigate an ALP coupling to a dark radiation sector (DR), allowing for its decay. Using a Bayesian analysis, we constrain the ALP parameter space with current cosmological data. Our analysis shows that ALP-induced DR does not resolve the existing tensions. Instead, the data place robust constraints on the model, favoring negative values of $\omega_\phi$ and constraining the symmetry-breaking scale to $f_\phi\in[80,1.5\times10^{10}]~\mathrm{TeV}$, corresponding to ALP masses in the range $m_\phi\in[10^{-20},10^{-2}]~\mathrm{eV}$.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript extends the standard pre-inflationary misalignment mechanism for axion-like particles (ALPs) by introducing a pre-oscillatory phase with constant equation of state ω_ϕ ∈ [-1,1] generated by a tracking potential. During the radiation-dominated era, the potential undergoes a rapid transition to the conventional cosine potential, asserted to drive the ALP into a kinetic misalignment phase (ω_ϕ=1) before oscillations. The authors also consider an ALP coupling to dark radiation (DR) permitting decay, perform a Bayesian analysis with cosmological data, and conclude that ALP-induced DR does not resolve H_0/S_8 tensions; instead the data favor negative ω_ϕ and constrain f_ϕ ∈ [80, 1.5×10^{10}] TeV (corresponding to m_ϕ ∈ [10^{-20}, 10^{-2}] eV).

Significance. If the transition dynamics are rigorously specified and the Bayesian pipeline is fully documented, the work supplies a concrete extension of ALP dark-matter models together with falsifiable parameter ranges that can guide laboratory and astrophysical searches. The negative result on tension resolution via DR is useful, and the use of external cosmological datasets supplies independent grounding for the reported bounds. The parameter-free aspects of the constant-ω_ϕ tracking phase (prior to the switch) represent a strength that could be highlighted more clearly.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (model description): The central claim that the rapid transition from tracking to cosine potential during radiation domination drives kinetic misalignment (ω_ϕ=1) and thereby sets the relic density and DR yield is load-bearing for the reported Bayesian constraints and the conclusion that DR does not resolve tensions. No timescale relative to H^{-1}, interpolating functional form (e.g., tanh or exponential switch), or extra parameter is specified; if the transition is not sufficiently abrupt the assumed field velocity at oscillation onset does not hold, altering the posteriors on ω_ϕ, f_ϕ and m_ϕ.
  2. [§4] §4 (Bayesian analysis): The abstract asserts that the analysis 'yields robust constraints' and that DR 'does not resolve the existing tensions,' yet the manuscript provides no explicit list of datasets (Planck, BAO, etc.), likelihood functions, priors on ω_ϕ/f_ϕ/m_ϕ, or systematic-error treatment. Without these the support for the quoted intervals f_ϕ ∈ [80, 1.5×10^{10}] TeV and the negative-ω_ϕ preference cannot be verified at the claimed robustness level.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Notation: the symbol ω_ϕ is used both for the constant pre-oscillatory value and for the post-transition equation of state; a clarifying subscript or explicit statement at first use would avoid confusion.
  2. [Abstract] The abstract states the mass range m_ϕ ∈ [10^{-20}, 10^{-2}] eV but does not indicate whether this follows directly from the f_ϕ bounds via the standard ALP mass relation or requires additional assumptions; a one-line derivation or reference would help.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and outline the revisions we intend to make to improve clarity and rigor.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2 (model description): The central claim that the rapid transition from tracking to cosine potential during radiation domination drives kinetic misalignment (ω_ϕ=1) and thereby sets the relic density and DR yield is load-bearing for the reported Bayesian constraints and the conclusion that DR does not resolve tensions. No timescale relative to H^{-1}, interpolating functional form (e.g., tanh or exponential switch), or extra parameter is specified; if the transition is not sufficiently abrupt the assumed field velocity at oscillation onset does not hold, altering the posteriors on ω_ϕ, f_ϕ and m_ϕ.

    Authors: We agree that the transition must be specified more rigorously to justify the kinetic misalignment assumption. In the revised manuscript we will introduce an explicit interpolating form (a tanh switch with characteristic timescale τ ≪ H^{-1} at the transition epoch) and derive the resulting field velocity analytically. We will also add a brief parameter study showing that the posteriors on ω_ϕ, f_ϕ and m_ϕ remain stable provided the transition is sufficiently rapid (τ H ≪ 1). These additions will appear in §2 together with a short appendix on transition sensitivity. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (Bayesian analysis): The abstract asserts that the analysis 'yields robust constraints' and that DR 'does not resolve the existing tensions,' yet the manuscript provides no explicit list of datasets (Planck, BAO, etc.), likelihood functions, priors on ω_ϕ/f_ϕ/m_ϕ, or systematic-error treatment. Without these the support for the quoted intervals f_ϕ ∈ [80, 1.5×10^{10}] TeV and the negative-ω_ϕ preference cannot be verified at the claimed robustness level.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the documentation of the Bayesian pipeline in §4 was insufficient for full reproducibility. Although the analysis employs standard datasets and likelihoods, we will expand §4 with a dedicated subsection that explicitly lists the datasets (Planck 2018 TT/TE/EE + lowE, BAO from BOSS/eBOSS, Pantheon+), the likelihood implementations, the priors (uniform on ω_ϕ ∈ [-1,1]; log-uniform on f_ϕ and m_ϕ), and the treatment of systematics via the published covariance matrices. This will allow independent verification of the reported constraints and the negative-ω_ϕ preference. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; constraints derived from external cosmological data.

full rationale

The paper extends the standard ALP misalignment mechanism by positing a constant-ω_ϕ tracking phase followed by a rapid transition to the cosine potential during radiation domination, then uses Bayesian inference on external cosmological datasets to obtain posterior constraints on ω_ϕ, f_ϕ, and m_ϕ. The central claims (non-resolution of H0/S8 tensions and the reported parameter ranges) are outputs of this data-driven fit rather than quantities that reduce by construction to the model's internal definitions or to self-citations. No load-bearing step equates a prediction to a fitted input, renames a known result, or imports uniqueness via author-overlapping citations; the derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 2 axioms · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on a new tracking potential and rapid transition (ad hoc to the paper) plus standard early-universe assumptions, with several parameters fitted directly to data.

free parameters (3)
  • ω_ϕ
    Bayesian analysis favors negative values; this parameter controls the pre-oscillatory equation of state and is fitted to cosmological data.
  • f_ϕ
    Symmetry-breaking scale constrained to [80, 1.5×10^{10}] TeV by the data fit.
  • m_ϕ
    ALP mass range [10^{-20}, 10^{-2}] eV derived from the fitted f_ϕ interval.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The universe is radiation-dominated during the relevant epochs
    Standard assumption invoked for the evolution of the ALP field and potential transition.
  • ad hoc to paper The potential undergoes a rapid transition from tracking to cosine form
    Introduced without further justification in the abstract to generate the constant-ω_ϕ phase and subsequent kinetic misalignment.
invented entities (2)
  • Tracking potential no independent evidence
    purpose: Generates the constant-ω_ϕ pre-oscillatory phase for the ALP
    New potential form postulated to extend the misalignment mechanism.
  • ALP-dark radiation coupling no independent evidence
    purpose: Allows ALP decay into dark radiation to potentially address cosmological tensions
    New interaction introduced to investigate DR effects.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5535 in / 1745 out tokens · 89732 ms · 2026-05-08T03:04:18.872396+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 96 canonical work pages · 6 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons

    R. D. Peccei and Helen R. Quinn. “CP Conservation in the Presence of Instantons”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.38 (1977), pp. 1440–1443.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.38.1440

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.38.1440 1977

  2. [2]

    Wilczek, Phys

    Frank Wilczek. “Problem of StrongPandTInvariance in the Presence of Instantons”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978), pp. 279–282.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.279

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.279 1978

  3. [3]

    Weinberg, Phys

    Steven Weinberg. “A New Light Boson?” In:Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (1978), pp. 223–226. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.223 1978

  4. [4]

    A simple solution to the strong CP problem with a harmless axion

    Michael Dine, Willy Fischler, and Mark Srednicki. “A Simple Solution to the Strong CP Problem with a Harmless Axion”. In:Phys. Lett. B104 (1981), pp. 199–202.doi: 10.1016/0370-2693(81)90590-6. 45

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(81)90590-6 1981

  5. [5]

    2024.url:https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/

    Ciaran O’Hare.Axion Limits. 2024.url:https://cajohare.github.io/AxionLimits/

    2024

  6. [6]

    Eby and V

    Joshua Eby and Volodymyr Takhistov. “Diffuse Axion Background”. In: (Jan. 2024). arXiv:2402.00100 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2024

  7. [7]

    Inverse see-saw neutrino masses in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity

    Francisco Del Aguila et al. “Inverse see-saw neutrino masses in the Littlest Higgs model with T-parity”. In:JHEP12 (2019), p. 154.doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2019)154. arXiv:1910.09569 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2019)154 2019

  8. [8]

    A new and gauge-invariant littlest Higgs model with T-parity

    Jos´ e Ignacio Illana and Jos´ e Mar´ ıa P´ erez-Poyatos. “A new and gauge-invariant littlest Higgs model with T-parity”. In:Eur. Phys. J. Plus137.1 (2022), p. 42.doi:10.1140/ epjp/s13360-021-02222-0. arXiv:2103.17078 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2022

  9. [9]

    Phenomenological implications of the new Littlest Higgs model with T-parity

    Jos´ e Ignacio Illana and Jos´ e Mar´ ıa P´ erez-Poyatos. “Phenomenological implications of the new Littlest Higgs model with T-parity”. In:JHEP11 (2022), p. 055.doi: 10.1007/JHEP11(2022)055. arXiv:2209.06195 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep11(2022)055 2022

  10. [10]

    Introduction to Extra Dimensions and Thick Braneworlds

    Yu-Xiao Liu. “Introduction to Extra Dimensions and Thick Braneworlds”. In: 2018. doi:10.1142/9789813237278_0008. arXiv:1707.08541 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1142/9789813237278_0008 2018

  11. [11]

    Cosmology of an axion-like majoron

    Antonio J. Cuesta et al. “Cosmology of an axion-like majoron”. In:JCAP04.04 (2022), p. 009.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/009. arXiv:2109.07336 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2022/04/009 2022

  12. [13]

    Axions In String Theory

    Peter Svrcek and Edward Witten. “Axions In String Theory”. In:JHEP06 (2006), p. 051.doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/06/051. arXiv:hep-th/0605206

    work page doi:10.1088/1126-6708/2006/06/051 2006

  13. [14]

    Freese, J

    Katherine Freese, Joshua A. Frieman, and Angela V. Olinto. “Natural inflation with pseudo - Nambu-Goldstone bosons”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.65 (1990), pp. 3233–3236. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.3233

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.65.3233 1990

  14. [15]

    Natural inflation: Particle physics models, power law spectra for large scale structure, and constraints from COBE

    Fred C. Adams et al. “Natural inflation: Particle physics models, power law spectra for large scale structure, and constraints from COBE”. In:Phys. Rev. D47 (1993), pp. 426–455.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.47.426. arXiv:hep-ph/9207245

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.47.426 1993

  15. [18]

    Lorentz covariance of the 4d nonlinear higher-spin equations via BRST

    A. Maleknejad and M. M. Sheikh-Jabbari. “Gauge-flation: Inflation From Non-Abelian Gauge Fields”. In:Phys. Lett. B723 (2013), pp. 224–228.doi:10.1016/j.physletb. 2013.05.001. arXiv:1102.1513 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb 2013

  16. [19]

    Chromo-Natural Inflation: Natural inflation on a steep potential with classical non-Abelian gauge fields

    Peter Adshead and Mark Wyman. “Chromo-Natural Inflation: Natural inflation on a steep potential with classical non-Abelian gauge fields”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.108 (2012), p. 261302.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett . 108 . 261302. arXiv:1202 . 2366 [hep-th]. 46

    2012

  17. [20]

    Trajectories with suppressed tensor-to-scalar ratio in Aligned Natural Inflation

    Marco Peloso and Caner Unal. “Trajectories with suppressed tensor-to-scalar ratio in Aligned Natural Inflation”. In:JCAP06 (2015), p. 040.doi:10 . 1088 / 1475 - 7516/2015/06/040. arXiv:1504.02784 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2015

  18. [21]

    Naturally inflating on steep potentials through electromagnetic dissipation

    Mohamed M. Anber and Lorenzo Sorbo. “Naturally inflating on steep potentials through electromagnetic dissipation”. In:Phys. Rev. D81 (2010), p. 043534.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.81.043534. arXiv:0908.4089 [hep-th]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.81.043534 2010

  19. [22]

    Physical Review D85(8), 083509 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.85

    Jessica L. Cook and Lorenzo Sorbo. “Particle production during inflation and gravita- tional waves detectable by ground-based interferometers”. In:Phys. Rev. D85 (2012). [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 86, 069901 (2012)], p. 023534.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.85. 023534. arXiv:1109.0022 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85 2012

  20. [23]

    , archivePrefix = "arXiv", eprint =

    Neil Barnaby, Enrico Pajer, and Marco Peloso. “Gauge Field Production in Axion Inflation: Consequences for Monodromy, non-Gaussianity in the CMB, and Grav- itational Waves at Interferometers”. In:Phys. Rev. D85 (2012), p. 023525.doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.85.023525. arXiv:1110.3327 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.85.023525 2012

  21. [24]

    Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion

    Ryo Namba et al. “Scale-dependent gravitational waves from a rolling axion”. In: JCAP01 (2016), p. 041.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/041. arXiv:1509.07521 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/01/041 2016

  22. [25]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =

    Emanuela Dimastrogiovanni, Matteo Fasiello, and Tomohiro Fujita. “Primordial Grav- itational Waves from Axion-Gauge Fields Dynamics”. In:JCAP01 (2017), p. 019.doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/019. arXiv:1608.04216 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2017/01/019 2017

  23. [27]

    Gravitational waves at inter- ferometer scales and primordial black holes in axion inflation

    Juan Garcia-Bellido, Marco Peloso, and Caner Unal. “Gravitational waves at inter- ferometer scales and primordial black holes in axion inflation”. In:JCAP12 (2016), p. 031.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/031. arXiv:1610.03763 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/12/031 2016

  24. [28]

    Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics , author =

    Valerie Domcke, Mauro Pieroni, and Pierre Bin´ etruy. “Primordial gravitational waves for universality classes of pseudoscalar inflation”. In:JCAP06 (2016), p. 031.doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/031. arXiv:1603.01287 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/06/031 2016

  25. [29]

    Axion-Gauge Dynamics During Inflation as the Origin of Pulsar Timing Array Signals and Primordial Black Holes

    Caner Unal, Alexandros Papageorgiou, and Ippei Obata. “Axion-Gauge Dynamics During Inflation as the Origin of Pulsar Timing Array Signals and Primordial Black Holes”. In: (July 2023). arXiv:2307.02322 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  26. [30]

    Axion Cosmology

    David J. E. Marsh. “Axion Cosmology”. In:Phys. Rept.643 (2016), pp. 1–79.doi: 10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.005. arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2016.06.005 2016

  27. [31]

    Low-scale mirror standard model dark matter and its detection via gravitational waves and the Guitar Nebula

    V. K. Oikonomou. “Low-scale mirror standard model dark matter and its detection via gravitational waves and the Guitar Nebula”. In:Phys. Rev. D110.12 (2024), p. 123509.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.110.123509. arXiv:2409.16095 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.110.123509 2024

  28. [33]

    The not-so-harmless axion

    Michael Dine and Willy Fischler. “The Not So Harmless Axion”. In:Phys. Lett. B120 (1983). Ed. by M. A. Srednicki, pp. 137–141.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90639-1

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90639-1 1983

  29. [35]

    Kolb and M.S

    Edward W. Kolb and Michael S. Turner.The Early Universe. Vol. 69. 1990.isbn: 978-0-201-62674-2.doi:10.1201/9780429492860

    work page doi:10.1201/9780429492860 1990

  30. [36]

    Development of Axion Perturbations in an Axion Dominated Universe

    Minos Axenides, Robert H. Brandenberger, and Michael S. Turner. “Development of Axion Perturbations in an Axion Dominated Universe”. In:Phys. Lett. B126 (1983), pp. 178–182.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90586-5

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90586-5 1983

  31. [37]

    Saving the Invisible Axion

    Paul J. Steinhardt and Michael S. Turner. “Saving the Invisible Axion”. In:Phys. Lett. B129 (1983), p. 51.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90727-X

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(83)90727-x 1983

  32. [38]

    A Prescription for Successful New Inflation

    P. J. Steinhardt and Michael S. Turner. “A Prescription for Successful New Inflation”. In:Phys. Rev. D29 (1984), pp. 2162–2171.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.29.2162

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.29.2162 1984

  33. [39]

    Generation of Isothermal Density Perturbations in the Inflationary Universe

    Andrei D. Linde. “Generation of Isothermal Density Perturbations in the Inflationary Universe”. In:Phys. Lett. B158 (1985), pp. 375–380.doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85) 90436-8

    work page doi:10.1016/0370-2693(85 1985

  34. [40]

    Isothermal Density Perturbations in an Axion Dominated Inflationary Universe

    D. Seckel and Michael S. Turner. “Isothermal Density Perturbations in an Axion Dominated Inflationary Universe”. In:Phys. Rev. D32 (1985), p. 3178.doi:10 . 1103/PhysRevD.32.3178

    1985

  35. [41]

    More on equations of motion for interacting massless fields of all spins in (3+1)-dimensions

    David H. Lyth. “A limit on the inflationary energy density from axion isocurva- ture fluctuations”. In:Physics Letters B236.4 (1990), pp. 408–410.issn: 0370-2693. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0370- 2693(90)90374- F.url:https://www. sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037026939090374F

    work page doi:10.1016/0370- 1990

  36. [42]

    Inflationary axion cosmology

    Michael S. Turner and Frank Wilczek. “Inflationary axion cosmology”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.66 (1991), pp. 5–8.doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.5

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.66.5 1991

  37. [43]

    The Search for dark matter axions

    Pierre Sikivie. “The Search for dark matter axions”. In:41st Rencontres de Moriond on Electroweak Interactions and Unified Theories. June 2006, pp. 371–380. arXiv: hep-ph/0606014

    work page arXiv 2006

  38. [45]

    Non-Gaussianity from isocurvature perturbations

    Masahiro Kawasaki et al. “Non-Gaussianity from isocurvature perturbations”. In: JCAP11 (2008), p. 019.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/11/019. arXiv:0808.0009 [astro-ph]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2008/11/019 2008

  39. [46]

    Relaxing Isocurva- ture Bounds on String Axion Dark Matter

    Masahiro Kawasaki, Naoya Kitajima, and Fuminobu Takahashi. “Relaxing Isocurva- ture Bounds on String Axion Dark Matter”. In:Phys. Lett. B737 (2014), pp. 178–184. doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.017. arXiv:1406.0660 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1016/j.physletb.2014.08.017 2014

  40. [47]

    New inflationary probes of axion dark matter

    Xingang Chen, JiJi Fan, and Lingfeng Li. “New inflationary probes of axion dark matter”. In:JHEP12 (2023), p. 197.doi:10.1007/JHEP12(2023)197. arXiv:2303. 03406 [hep-ph]. 48

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep12(2023)197 2023

  41. [48]

    Axion Kinetic Misalign- ment Mechanism

    Raymond T. Co, Lawrence J. Hall, and Keisuke Harigaya. “Axion Kinetic Misalign- ment Mechanism”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett.124.25 (2020), p. 251802.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevLett.124.251802. arXiv:1910.14152 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv 2020

  42. [49]

    Tensions between the Early and the Late Universe

    L. Verde, T. Treu, and A. G. Riess. “Tensions between the Early and the Late Uni- verse”. In:Nature Astron.3 (July 2019), p. 891.doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0. arXiv:1907.10625 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0902-0 2019

  43. [50]

    Knox and M

    Lloyd Knox and Marius Millea. “Hubble constant hunter’s guide”. In:Phys. Rev. D 101.4 (2020), p. 043533.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043533. arXiv:1908.03663 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.043533 2020

  44. [51]

    In the Realm of the Hubble tension $-$ a Review of Solutions

    Eleonora Di Valentino et al. “In the realm of the Hubble tension—a review of so- lutions”. In:Class. Quant. Grav.38.15 (2021), p. 153001.doi:10 . 1088 / 1361 - 6382/ac086d. arXiv:2103.01183 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2021

  45. [52]

    A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant

    Paul Shah, Pablo Lemos, and Ofer Lahav. “A buyer’s guide to the Hubble constant”. In:Astron. Astrophys. Rev.29.1 (2021), p. 9.doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00137-4. arXiv:2109.01161 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1007/s00159-021-00137-4 2021

  46. [53]

    Perego, A

    Tilman Tr¨ oster et al. “Cosmology from large-scale structure: Constraining ΛCDM with BOSS”. In:Astron. Astrophys.633 (2020), p. L10.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 201936772. arXiv:1909.11006 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/ 2020

  47. [54]

    and Simonovi\'c, Marko and Zaldarriaga, Matias

    Mikhail M. Ivanov, Marko Simonovi´ c, and Matias Zaldarriaga. “Cosmological Param- eters from the BOSS Galaxy Power Spectrum”. In:JCAP05 (2020), p. 042.doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/042. arXiv:1909.05277 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2020/05/042 2020

  48. [55]

    KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics

    Marika Asgari et al. “KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Cosmic shear constraints and comparison between two point statistics”. In:Astron. Astrophys.645 (2021), A104.doi:10.1051/ 0004-6361/202039070. arXiv:2007.15633 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2021

  49. [56]

    , keywords =

    H. Hildebrandt et al. “KiDS-1000 catalogue: Redshift distributions and their calibra- tion”. In:Astron. Astrophys.647 (2021), A124.doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039018. arXiv:2007.15635 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039018 2021

  50. [57]

    Peißker, M

    Tilman Tr¨ oster et al. “KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Constraints beyond flat ΛCDM”. In: Astron. Astrophys.649 (2021), A88.doi:10.1051/0004- 6361/202039805. arXiv: 2010.16416 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1051/0004- 2021

  51. [58]

    , keywords =

    T. M. C. Abbott et al. “Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing”. In:Phys. Rev. D105.2 (2022), p. 023520. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.105.023520. arXiv:2105.13549 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.105.023520 2022

  52. [59]

    BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology: ΛCDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole

    Oliver H. E. Philcox and Mikhail M. Ivanov. “BOSS DR12 full-shape cosmology: ΛCDM constraints from the large-scale galaxy power spectrum and bispectrum monopole”. In:Phys. Rev. D105.4 (2022), p. 043517.doi:10 . 1103 / PhysRevD . 105 . 043517. arXiv:2112.04515 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2022

  53. [60]

    Cosmological constraints from unWISE and Planck CMB lensing tomography

    Alex Krolewski, Simone Ferraro, and Martin White. “Cosmological constraints from unWISE and Planck CMB lensing tomography”. In:JCAP12.12 (2021), p. 028.doi: 10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/028. arXiv:2105.03421 [astro-ph.CO]. 49

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/12/028 2021

  54. [61]

    Cosmic shear with small scales: DES-Y3, KiDS-1000 and HSC-DR1

    Carlos Garc´ ıa-Garc´ ıa et al. “Cosmic shear with small scales: DES-Y3, KiDS-1000 and HSC-DR1”. In: (Mar. 2024). arXiv:2403.13794 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2024

  55. [62]

    Arbitrating the S8 discrepancy with growth rate measurements from redshift-space distortions

    Rafael C. Nunes and Sunny Vagnozzi. “Arbitrating the S8 discrepancy with growth rate measurements from redshift-space distortions”. In:Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 505.4 (2021), pp. 5427–5437.doi:10 . 1093 / mnras / stab1613. arXiv:2106 . 01208 [astro-ph.CO]

    2021

  56. [63]

    Axion Misalignment Driven to the Bottom

    Raymond T. Co, Eric Gonzalez, and Keisuke Harigaya. “Axion Misalignment Driven to the Bottom”. In:JHEP05 (2019), p. 162.doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)162. arXiv: 1812.11186 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2019)162 2019

  57. [64]

    Axion Misalignment Driven to the Hilltop

    Raymond T. Co, Eric Gonzalez, and Keisuke Harigaya. “Axion Misalignment Driven to the Hilltop”. In:JHEP05 (2019), p. 163.doi:10.1007/JHEP05(2019)163. arXiv: 1812.11192 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep05(2019)163 2019

  58. [65]

    QCD Axion Kinetic Misalignment without Prejudice

    Basabendu Barman et al. “QCD Axion Kinetic Misalignment without Prejudice”. In: Universe8.12 (2022), p. 634.doi:10.3390/universe8120634. arXiv:2111.03677 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe8120634 2022

  59. [67]

    Dark matter from an even lighter QCD axion: trapped misalign- ment

    Luca Di Luzio et al. “Dark matter from an even lighter QCD axion: trapped misalign- ment”. In:JCAP10 (2021), p. 001.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/001. arXiv: 2102.01082 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2021/10/001 2021

  60. [68]

    Resonant production of dark photons from axions without a large coupling

    Naoya Kitajima and Fuminobu Takahashi. “Resonant production of dark photons from axions without a large coupling”. In:Phys. Rev. D107.12 (2023), p. 123518. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.107.123518. arXiv:2303.05492 [hep-ph]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.107.123518 2023

  61. [69]

    Axion dark matter from frictional misalignment

    Alexandros Papageorgiou, Pablo Qu´ ılez, and Kai Schmitz. “Axion dark matter from frictional misalignment”. In:JHEP01 (2023), p. 169.doi:10.1007/JHEP01(2023)

    work page doi:10.1007/jhep01(2023 2023

  62. [70]

    arXiv:2206.01129 [hep-ph]

    work page arXiv

  63. [71]

    Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters

    N. Aghanim et al. “Planck 2018 results. VI. Cosmological parameters”. In:Astron. Astrophys.641 (2020). [Erratum: Astron.Astrophys. 652, C4 (2021)], A6.doi:10 . 1051/0004-6361/201833910. arXiv:1807.06209 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2018

  64. [72]

    A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team

    Adam G. Riess et al. “A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km s−1 Mpc−1 Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team”. In:Astrophys. J. Lett.934.1 (2022), p. L7.doi:10 . 3847 / 2041 - 8213/ac5c5b. arXiv:2112.04510 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv 2022

  65. [73]

    Spectrum of adiabatic perturbations in the universe when there are singularities in the inflation potential

    Alexei A. Starobinsky. “Spectrum of adiabatic perturbations in the universe when there are singularities in the inflation potential”. In:JETP Lett.55 (1992), pp. 489– 494

    1992

  66. [74]

    Inflationary perturbations from a potential with a step

    Jennifer A. Adams, Bevan Cresswell, and Richard Easther. “Inflationary perturbations from a potential with a step”. In:Phys. Rev. D64 (2001), p. 123514.doi:10.1103/ PhysRevD.64.123514. arXiv:astro-ph/0102236. 50

    work page arXiv 2001

  67. [75]

    Inflation and WMAP three year data: Features have a Future!

    Laura Covi et al. “Inflation and WMAP three year data: Features have a Future!” In:Phys. Rev. D74 (2006), p. 083509.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.74.083509. arXiv: astro-ph/0606452

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.74.083509 2006

  68. [77]

    A fresh look at linear cosmological constraints on a decaying dark matter component

    Vivian Poulin, Pasquale D. Serpico, and Julien Lesgourgues. “A fresh look at linear cosmological constraints on a decaying dark matter component”. In:JCAP08 (2016), p. 036.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/036. arXiv:1606.02073 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2016/08/036 2016

  69. [78]

    Dark matter component decaying after recombination: Lensing constraints with Planck data

    A. Chudaykin, D. Gorbunov, and I. Tkachev. “Dark matter component decaying after recombination: Lensing constraints with Planck data”. In:Phys. Rev. D94 (2016), p. 023528.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.94.023528. arXiv:1602.08121 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.94.023528 2016

  70. [79]

    Dark matter component decaying after recombination: Sensitivity to baryon acoustic oscillation and redshift space distortion probes

    A. Chudaykin, D. Gorbunov, and I. Tkachev. “Dark matter component decaying after recombination: Sensitivity to baryon acoustic oscillation and redshift space distortion probes”. In:Phys. Rev. D97.8 (2018), p. 083508.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.97.083508. arXiv:1711.06738 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.97.083508 2018

  71. [80]

    M., Crawford, T

    Andreas Nygaard, Thomas Tram, and Steen Hannestad. “Updated constraints on decaying cold dark matter”. In:JCAP05 (2021), p. 017.doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2021/05/017. arXiv:2011.01632 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1088/1475-7516/ 2021

  72. [81]

    Converting nonrelativistic dark matter to radiation

    Torsten Bringmann et al. “Converting nonrelativistic dark matter to radiation”. In: Phys. Rev. D98.2 (2018), p. 023543.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.98.023543. arXiv: 1803.03644 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.98.023543 2018

  73. [82]

    Constraints on dark matter to dark radiation conversion in the late universe with DES-Y1 and external data

    A. Chen et al. “Constraints on dark matter to dark radiation conversion in the late universe with DES-Y1 and external data”. In:Phys. Rev. D103.12 (2021), p. 123528. doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.103.123528. arXiv:2011.04606 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.103.123528 2021

  74. [83]

    Converting dark matter to dark radiation does not solve cosmological tensions

    Fiona McCarthy and J. Colin Hill. “Converting dark matter to dark radiation does not solve cosmological tensions”. In:Phys. Rev. D108.6 (2023), p. 063501.doi:10. 1103/PhysRevD.108.063501. arXiv:2210.14339 [astro-ph.CO]

    work page arXiv 2023

  75. [84]

    Dynamics of Cosmological Scalar Fields Revisited†

    Jan-Willem van Holten. “Dynamics of Cosmological Scalar Fields Revisited†”. In: Universe10.5 (2024), p. 197.doi:10.3390/universe10050197. arXiv:2305.17413 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.3390/universe10050197 2024

  76. [85]

    Tinto and J

    Bharat Ratra and P. J. E. Peebles. “Cosmological Consequences of a Rolling Homo- geneous Scalar Field”. In:Phys. Rev. D37 (1988), p. 3406.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD. 37.3406

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd 1988

  77. [86]

    Cosmological tracking solu- tions

    Paul J. Steinhardt, Li-Min Wang, and Ivaylo Zlatev. “Cosmological tracking solu- tions”. In:Phys. Rev. D59 (1999), p. 123504.doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.59.123504. arXiv:astro-ph/9812313

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.59.123504 1999

  78. [87]

    https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218271800000542

    Varun Sahni and Alexei A. Starobinsky. “The Case for a positive cosmological Lambda term”. In:Int. J. Mod. Phys. D9 (2000), pp. 373–444.doi:10.1142/S0218271800000542. arXiv:astro-ph/9904398. 51

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218271800000542 2000

  79. [88]

    Quintessence: A Review

    Shinji Tsujikawa. “Quintessence: A Review”. In:Class. Quant. Grav.30 (2013), p. 214003. doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214003. arXiv:1304.1961 [gr-qc]

    work page doi:10.1088/0264-9381/30/21/214003 2013

  80. [89]

    Cosmological perturbation theory in the synchronous and conformal Newtonian gauges

    Chung-Pei Ma and Edmund Bertschinger. “Cosmological perturbation theory in the synchronous and conformal Newtonian gauges”. In:Astrophys. J.455 (1995), pp. 7– 25.doi:10.1086/176550. arXiv:astro-ph/9506072

    work page doi:10.1086/176550 1995

Showing first 80 references.