arxiv: 2605.01290 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-02 · 🧬 q-bio.QM

Recognition: unknown

How Light Reshapes the Mind. An Active Inference Framework for the Cognitive and Emotional Effects of Indoor Lighting

Luca M. Possati

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-10 14:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧬 q-bio.QM

keywords indoor lightingcognitive effectsemotional effectsperceptual precisionarousalbehavioral dispositionreading performanceMonte Carlo simulations

0 comments

The pith

Indoor lighting influences cognition by adjusting perceptual precision, arousal relative to circadian needs, and behavioral tendencies in a unified model.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper argues that effects of lighting on thinking, feeling, and action form a single process rather than separate findings. It identifies three channels: how bright the light is changes how precisely people perceive details, the color temperature shifts arousal toward or away from an ideal daily rhythm, and the mix of wavelengths pushes behavior toward active engagement or rest. These ideas are tested in a model of people doing sustained reading for five hours, where the setup produces six specific predictions about performance and eye movements. Simulations run twenty times confirm every prediction. A reader would care because the account suggests practical ways to choose lighting in offices, classrooms, and libraries to support focus and mood without treating each effect in isolation.

Core claim

Lighting shapes behaviour through three distinct channels: illuminance modulates perceptual precision, correlated colour temperature modulates arousal relative to circadian optimum, and spectral composition biases behavioural disposition toward engagement or rest. This hypothesis is formalised in a proof-of-concept model of agents performing sustained reading over five hours that incorporates both reading performance and eye-tracking observations. The model generates six falsifiable predictions, all of which hold across twenty Monte Carlo simulations.

What carries the argument

A proof-of-concept model of agents performing sustained reading over five hours that incorporates the three lighting modulations and generates predictions from reading performance and eye-tracking observations.

If this is right

Lighting designs can be tuned to specific values of illuminance, colour temperature, and spectrum to produce measurable gains in sustained attention.
Eye-tracking data will show systematic shifts in fixation duration and pupil response tied directly to each of the three channels.
Performance over a five-hour period will follow distinct trajectories depending on which channel is adjusted.
The same three-channel structure applies across shared indoor spaces such as offices and classrooms.
Optimising lighting according to the model improves both accuracy and speed of reading tasks.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The approach could be tested in non-reading tasks such as meetings or computer work to check whether the same three channels dominate.
Real environments with multiple users might reveal small interaction effects among the channels that the current simulations omit.
Integration with existing lighting standards could produce concrete recommendations for spectrum and temperature ranges that support alertness.
Longer-term studies could examine whether repeated exposure to optimised lighting alters baseline arousal levels over days or weeks.

Load-bearing premise

That cognitive and emotional effects of lighting reduce to three independent modulations inside the model without additional mechanisms or interactions.

What would settle it

A controlled experiment measuring reading performance and eye movements under varied lighting that fails to produce the six predicted patterns.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.01290 by Luca M. Possati.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Session wpm by lighting scenario, chronotype, and spatial position ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Continuous lux sweep: session wpm as a function of illuminance (S2 scenario, centre [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Designer’s view: mean session wpm averaged across all three chronotypes, by spatial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_4.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Running wpm over the T = 15 decision steps (MC mean ±1 SD, centre position, NMC = 20). Each panel shows one lighting scenario; coloured lines correspond to chronotypes. The dashed vertical line marks the fatigue onset at 45 minutes (step 3). In both S1 (left panel) and S3 (right panel), the lark–owl ordering is absent or reversed in the first half of the session and settles into its final direction only in… view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Posterior belief Q(s = focused) over the session (MC mean, centre position, NMC = 20). The dashed vertical line marks the fatigue onset at 45 minutes (step 3). Three phases are distinguishable across all conditions: a stable high-belief phase (steps 0–2, f(t) = 1.00); a progressive decline phase (steps 3–8, f(t) falling from 0.93 to 0.46); and a near-collapsed phase (steps 9–14, f(t) ≤ 0.34). Under S3/cent… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Left: Circadian arousal optima a ∗ (t, c) for the three chronotypes over the five-hour session (09:00–14:00). The lark (blue) declines from 0.70 at session onset to 0.63 by 14:00; the owl (orange) rises from 0.70 to 0.80; the intermediate (green) follows a shallow arc peaking near noon. The 0.17-unit divergence between lark and owl by session end drives the half-session crossover. Right: Fatigue factor f(t… view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Mean pass rate across the parameter sweep for each prediction. Green [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p042_8.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Pass-rate curves along each parameter sweep. Dashed vertical lines mark the nominal [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p043_9.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Indoor lighting affects cognition, affect, and behavioural regulation, but these effects are often treated as isolated findings rather than as parts of a unified process. This paper proposes an active inference account of shared indoor lighting in multi-user environments such as offices, classrooms, and libraries. It argues that lighting shapes behaviour through three distinct channels: illuminance modulates perceptual precision, correlated colour temperature modulates arousal relative to circadian optimum, and spectral composition biases behavioural disposition toward engagement or rest. The paper formalises this hypothesis through a proof-of-concept POMDP model of agents performing sustained reading over five hours, using both reading performance and eye-tracking observations. The model generates six falsifiable predictions, all confirmed across 20 Monte Carlo simulations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

A clean formalization of three lighting channels in active inference, but the Monte Carlo checks only confirm the model runs as written.

read the letter

The paper's core move is to map indoor lighting onto active inference via three channels: illuminance sets perceptual precision, correlated colour temperature shifts arousal around a circadian baseline, and spectral composition biases action toward engagement or rest. It then builds a POMDP for agents doing sustained reading and derives six predictions from that setup. That mapping and the shared-space framing are not in the prior active-inference or lighting literature the abstract cites, so the formalization itself is the new piece. The model is written clearly enough that the predictions follow directly from the parameter choices, and the Monte Carlo runs show internal consistency across 20 trajectories. That is useful for anyone who wants a starting point to simulate multi-user lighting effects without starting from scratch. The obvious limitation is that the six predictions are generated by the same equations that define the channels, then recovered from simulations of those equations. No external dataset, no parameter fitting to real eye-tracking or reading scores, and no comparison to existing empirical lighting studies appear in the description. The result is a proof-of-concept that demonstrates the framework can be made to work, not a test of whether the three-channel reduction captures what actually happens in offices or classrooms. Readers already working in active inference or environmental psychology will find the POMDP structure worth examining for its own sake. Others will see it as a modeling proposal that still needs human data before the predictions can be treated as evidence. I would send it to peer review so the formal details and the exact scope of the claims can be checked by people who know both the active-inference literature and the lighting experiments. It is not ready for strong conclusions, but the modeling step is worth referee time.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes an active inference POMDP framework to unify cognitive, affective, and behavioral effects of indoor lighting in shared spaces. It posits three independent channels—illuminance modulating perceptual precision, correlated color temperature (CCT) shifting arousal relative to circadian optimum, and spectral composition biasing behavioral disposition toward engagement or rest—and implements these in a proof-of-concept model of agents performing sustained reading over five hours. The model derives six falsifiable predictions that are reported as confirmed in 20 Monte Carlo simulations, using simulated reading performance and eye-tracking observations.

Significance. If externally validated, the framework could supply a principled, generative account linking lighting parameters to perceptual, physiological, and action-selection processes, with direct implications for evidence-based lighting standards in offices and classrooms. The active-inference formalization is a strength, as it yields explicit, parameterizable predictions rather than post-hoc correlations. However, the current significance is constrained by the absence of any external human dataset, parameter fitting, or independent empirical test.

major comments (2)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'the model generates six falsifiable predictions, all confirmed across 20 Monte Carlo simulations' is load-bearing yet circular. Because the POMDP transition and observation models are defined to implement exactly the three modulations (illuminance → precision, CCT → arousal offset, spectral composition → disposition bias), any trajectory sampled from those equations will exhibit the predicted patterns by construction; the Monte Carlo runs therefore verify internal consistency rather than provide an independent test.
[Abstract] The manuscript states that 'reading performance and eye-tracking observations are used,' yet no external human dataset, subject-level parameter fitting, or comparison against real-world lighting studies is described. Without such grounding, the six predictions remain model-derived hypotheses rather than empirically falsified claims.

minor comments (1)

Clarify whether the three channels are strictly independent or allow for interactions (e.g., illuminance also affecting arousal); the current description treats them as additive but does not state the assumption explicitly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We appreciate the referee's detailed feedback on our manuscript. The comments highlight important distinctions between model verification and empirical validation, which we have addressed by revising the abstract and discussion to better reflect the proof-of-concept nature of the work.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that 'the model generates six falsifiable predictions, all confirmed across 20 Monte Carlo simulations' is load-bearing yet circular. Because the POMDP transition and observation models are defined to implement exactly the three modulations (illuminance → precision, CCT → arousal offset, spectral composition → disposition bias), any trajectory sampled from those equations will exhibit the predicted patterns by construction; the Monte Carlo runs therefore verify internal consistency rather than provide an independent test.

Authors: We agree that the simulations primarily verify the internal consistency of the POMDP implementation rather than constituting an independent empirical test. The predictions are non-trivial implications of the active inference formalization applied to lighting effects on reading, and the Monte Carlo simulations confirm that these effects emerge consistently from the model. We have revised the abstract to remove the implication of empirical confirmation and instead state that the model generates patterns consistent with the six predictions, which can now be tested in future human experiments. revision: yes
Referee: [Abstract] The manuscript states that 'reading performance and eye-tracking observations are used,' yet no external human dataset, subject-level parameter fitting, or comparison against real-world lighting studies is described. Without such grounding, the six predictions remain model-derived hypotheses rather than empirically falsified claims.

Authors: Correct. The current work is a proof-of-concept model that employs simulated observations to demonstrate the framework's dynamics. No human data were used or fitted. We have clarified this in the revised abstract and added text in the discussion section outlining the need for and plans toward empirical validation against real-world studies. revision: yes

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

Monte Carlo 'confirmations' are internal to the model by construction

specific steps

self definitional [Abstract]
"The model generates six falsifiable predictions, all confirmed across 20 Monte Carlo simulations."

The POMDP is defined to implement exactly the three independent modulations (illuminance → perceptual precision, CCT → arousal relative to circadian optimum, spectral composition → behavioral disposition). Any trajectory sampled from those equations will, by design, display the predicted patterns; the Monte Carlo runs therefore verify that the formalization is self-consistent rather than testing the hypothesis against external observations.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that its POMDP encodes three lighting channels and then generates six falsifiable predictions that are confirmed in 20 Monte Carlo runs of the identical model. Because the transition and observation models are explicitly constructed to implement illuminance-modulated precision, CCT-modulated arousal offset, and spectral-composition-modulated disposition bias, every simulated trajectory is guaranteed to exhibit the predicted patterns unless a coding error occurs. No external human dataset, parameter fitting to real subjects, or independent empirical benchmark is described; the 'confirmations' therefore reduce to a check of the model's internal consistency rather than an independent test of the three-channel hypothesis.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so specific free parameters, axioms, and invented entities cannot be enumerated; the framework implicitly introduces parameters for precision weighting, arousal scaling, and disposition bias that are fitted or chosen to produce the six predictions.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5417 in / 1184 out tokens · 32627 ms · 2026-05-10T14:44:36.771350+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

[1]

Abbas, S., Okdeh, N., Roufayel, R., Kovacic, H., Sabatier, J.-M., Fajloun, Z., and Abi Khattar, Z. (2024). Neuroarchitecture: How the perception of our surroundings impacts the brain. Biology, 13(4), 220. doi: 10.3390/biology13040220

work page doi:10.3390/biology13040220 2024
[2]

Barkmann, C., Wessolowski, N., and Schulte-Markwort, M. (2012). Applicability and efficacy of variable light in schools. Physiology & Behavior, 105(3), 621--627. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.020

work page doi:10.1016/j.physbeh.2011.09.020 2012
[3]

Blume, C., Garbazza, C., and Spitschan, M. (2019). Effects of light on human circadian rhythms, sleep and mood. Somnologie, 23(3), 147--156. doi: 10.1007/s11818-019-00215-x

work page doi:10.1007/s11818-019-00215-x 2019
[4]

Boyce, P. R. (2010). Review: The impact of light in buildings on human health. Indoor and Built Environment, 19(1), 8--20. doi: 10.1177/1420326X09358028

work page doi:10.1177/1420326x09358028 2010
[5]

Boyce, P. R. (2022). Light, lighting and human health. Lighting Research & Technology, 54(2), 101--144. doi: 10.1177/14771535211010267

work page doi:10.1177/14771535211010267 2022
[6]

Campbell, I., Navarrete, J., and Hattar, S. (2023). Light as a modulator of non-image-forming brain functions: Positive and negative impacts of increasing light availability. Frontiers in Neural Circuits, 17, 1105037. doi: 10.3389/fncir.2023.1105037

work page doi:10.3389/fncir.2023.1105037 2023
[7]

Campbell, I. et al. (2024). Regional response to light illuminance across the human subcortical visual system inferred from 7T fMRI. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 121(43), e2406465121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2406465121

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.2406465121 2024
[8]

L., and Llinares, C

Castilla, N., Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., and Llinares, C. (2023). The effects of illuminance on students' memory: A neuroarchitecture study. Building and Environment, 228, 109833

2023
[9]

Chauca, M., Mendoza, E., Moyano, O., Piedra, L., Vega, M., and S\'anchez, A. (2024). Improvement of student performance based on the lighting conditions of learning spaces: A systematic review analysis. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(16), 10619. doi: 10.24294/jipd10619

work page doi:10.24294/jipd10619 2024
[10]

L., Steiner, R., Oelhafen, P., Lang, D., Götz, T., Krebs, J., and Cajochen, C

Chellappa, S. L., Steiner, R., Oelhafen, P., Lang, D., Götz, T., Krebs, J., and Cajochen, C. (2011). Non-visual effects of light on melatonin, alertness and cognitive performance: Can blue-enriched light keep us alert? PLoS ONE, 6(1), e16429. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016429

work page doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016429 2011
[11]

and Suk, H.-J

Choi, K. and Suk, H.-J. (2016). Dynamic lighting system for the learning environment: Performance of elementary students. Optics Express, 24(10). doi: 10.1364/OE.24.00A907

work page doi:10.1364/oe.24.00a907 2016
[12]

C upkov\'a, D., Kaj\'ati, E., Mocnej, J., Papcun, P., Koziorek, J., and Zolotov\'a, I. (2019). Intelligent human-centric lighting for mental wellbeing improvement. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 15(9), 1550147719875878. doi: 10.1177/1550147719875878

work page doi:10.1177/1550147719875878 2019
[13]

and Archer, S

Dijk, D.-J. and Archer, S. N. (2009). Light, sleep, and circadian rhythms: Together again. PLoS Biology, 7(6), e1000145. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000145

work page doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000145 2009
[14]

B., Petrini, L., and Gramann, K

Djebbara, Z., Fich, L. B., Petrini, L., and Gramann, K. (2019). Sensorimotor brain dynamics reflect architectural affordances. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(29), 14769--14778. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1900648116

work page doi:10.1073/pnas.1900648116 2019
[15]

B., and Gramann, K

Djebbara, Z., Fich, L. B., and Gramann, K. (2021). The brain dynamics of architectural affordances during transition. Scientific Reports, 11, 2796. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82504-w

work page doi:10.1038/s41598-021-82504-w 2021
[16]

Easterbrook, J. A. (1959). The effect of emotion on cue utilization and the organization of behavior. Psychological Review, 66(3), 183--201. doi: 10.1037/h0047707

work page doi:10.1037/h0047707 1959
[17]

Eberhard, J. P. (2009a). Brain Landscape: The Coexistence of Neuroscience and Architecture. Oxford University Press, Oxford
[18]

Eberhard, J. P. (2009b). Applying neuroscience to architecture. Neuron, 62(6), 753--756. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2009.06.001 2009
[19]

Elliot, A. J. (2015). Color and psychological functioning: A review of theoretical and empirical work. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 368. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00368

work page doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00368 2015
[20]

Friston, K. (2010). The free-energy principle: a rough guide to the brain? Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(2), 127--138. doi: 10.1038/nrn2787

work page doi:10.1038/nrn2787 2010
[21]

Friston, K. (2013). Life as we know it. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 10(86), 20130475. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0475

work page doi:10.1098/rsif.2013.0475 2013
[22]

Friston, K. (2019). A free energy principle for a particular physics. arXiv preprint, arXiv:1906.10184. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1906.10184

work page doi:10.48550/arxiv.1906.10184 2019
[23]

K., Kent, B

Grant, L. K., Kent, B. A., Mayer, M. D., Stickgold, R., Lockley, S. W., and Rahman, S. A. (2021). Daytime exposure to short wavelength-enriched light improves cognitive performance in sleep-restricted college-aged adults. Frontiers in Neurology, 12, 624217. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.624217

work page doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.624217 2021
[24]

Guarnieri, T. (2024). Light sensing beyond vision: Focusing on a possible role for the FICZ/AhR complex in skin optotransduction. Cells, 13(13), 1082. doi: 10.3390/cells13131082

work page doi:10.3390/cells13131082 2024
[25]

N., Bernstein, P

Hatori, M., Gronfier, C., Van Gelder, R. N., Bernstein, P. S., Carreras, J., Panda, S., Marks, F., Sliney, D., Hunt, C. E., Hirota, T., Furukawa, T., and Tsubota, K. (2017). Global rise of potential health hazards caused by blue light-induced circadian disruption in modern aging societies. npj Aging and Mechanisms of Disease, 3, 9. doi: 10.1038/s41514-017-0010-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41514-017-0010-2 2017
[26]

M., Smolders, K

Huiberts, L. M., Smolders, K. C. H. J., and de Kort, Y. A. W. (2015). Shining light on memory: Effects of bright light on working memory performance. Behavioural Brain Research, 294, 234--245. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.045

work page doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2015.07.045 2015
[27]

Jung, D., An, J., and Hong, T. (2024). Exploring the relationship between office lighting, cognitive performance, and psychophysiological responses: A multidimensional approach. Building and Environment, 263, 111863

2024
[28]

Keis, O., Helbig, H., Streb, J., and Hille, K. (2014). Influence of blue-enriched classroom lighting on students' cognitive performance. Trends in Neuroscience and Education, 3(3--4), 86--92. doi: 10.1016/j.tine.2014.09.001

work page doi:10.1016/j.tine.2014.09.001 2014
[29]

Kızıltunalı, B. (2023). A literature review: The impact of light on students' learning performance. Humanising Language Teaching Magazine, August 2023

2023
[30]

Knez, I. (1995). Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 39--51. doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90013-6

work page doi:10.1016/0272-4944(95)90013-6 1995
[31]

R., and Goldust, M

Kumari, J., Das, K., Babaei, M., Rokni, G. R., and Goldust, M. (2023). The impact of blue light and digital screens on the skin. Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 22(4), 1185--1190. doi: 10.1111/jocd.15576

work page doi:10.1111/jocd.15576 2023
[32]

N., Schöllhorn, I., Richter, M., and Cajochen, C

Lasauskaite, R., Wüst, L. N., Schöllhorn, I., Richter, M., and Cajochen, C. (2025). Non-image-forming effects of daytime electric light exposure in humans: A systematic review and meta-analyses of physiological, cognitive, and subjective outcomes. LEUKOS. doi: 10.1080/15502724.2025.2493669

work page doi:10.1080/15502724.2025.2493669 2025
[33]

A., Fernandez, D

LeGates, T. A., Fernandez, D. C., and Hattar, S. (2014). Light as a central modulator of circadian rhythms, sleep and affect. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(7), 443--454. doi: 10.1038/nrn3743

work page doi:10.1038/nrn3743 2014
[34]

and Yao, R

Li, Z. and Yao, R. (2025). Assessing the impact of office artificial lighting on young adults' reading performance through eye-tracking analysis. Building and Environment, 285, 113532

2025
[35]

Livingston, J. (2022). Designing with Light: The Art, Science, and Practice of Architectural Lighting Design. 2nd edn. Wiley, Hoboken, NJ

2022
[36]

H., Rutherford, A., and Burnette, J

Mott, M., Robinson, D. H., Rutherford, A., and Burnette, J. (2012). Illuminating the effects of dynamic lighting on student learning. SAGE Open, April--June, 1--9

2012
[37]

Namjoshi, S. V. (2026). Fundamentals of Active Inference: Principles, Algorithms, and Applications of the Free Energy Principle for Engineers. The MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262050951

2026
[38]

and Firth, A

Naylor, K. and Firth, A. Y. (2008). The effect of coloured paper and lighting on the rate of reading in an adult student population. British and Irish Orthoptic Journal, 5, 54--57

2008
[39]

L., Higuera-Trujillo, J

Nol\'e Fajardo, M. L., Higuera-Trujillo, J. L., and Llinares, C. (2023). Lighting, colour and geometry: Which has the greatest influence on students' cognitive processes? Frontiers of Architectural Research, 12, 575--586. doi: 10.1016/j.foar.2023.02.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.foar.2023.02.003 2023
[40]

Y., Ha, R.-Y., Ryu, V., Kim, E., Jung, Y.-C., and Kim, S.-Y

Park, J. Y., Ha, R.-Y., Ryu, V., Kim, E., Jung, Y.-C., and Kim, S.-Y. (2013). Effects of color temperature and brightness on electroencephalogram alpha activity in a polychromatic light-emitting diode. Clinical Psychopharmacology and Neuroscience, 11(3), 126--131. doi: 10.9758/cpn.2013.11.3.126

work page doi:10.9758/cpn.2013.11.3.126 2013
[41]

Parr, T., Pezzulo, G., & Friston, K. J. (2022). Active Inference: The Free Energy Principle in Mind, Brain, and Behavior. The MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262045353

2022
[42]

Plummer, H. (2016). The Experience of Architecture. Thames & Hudson, London

2016
[43]

Possati, L. M. (2026). Design for Entropy: Active Inference and Technology. The MIT Press. ISBN: 9780262056267

2026
[44]

Ram, M. S. and Bhardwaj, R. (2018). Effect of different illumination sources on reading and visual performance. Journal of Ophthalmic and Vision Research, 13(1), 44--49. doi: 10.4103/jovr.jovr\_50\_17

work page doi:10.4103/jovr.jovr 2018
[45]

and Pallasmaa, J., eds

Robinson, S. and Pallasmaa, J., eds. (2015). Mind in Architecture: Neuroscience, Embodiment, and the Future of Design. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

2015
[46]

Ru, T., Smolders, K. C. H. J., Chen, Q., Zhou, G., and de Kort, Y. A. W. (2021). Diurnal effects of illuminance on performance: Exploring the moderating role of cognitive domain and task difficulty. Lighting Research & Technology, 53, 727--747. doi: 10.1177/1477153521990645

work page doi:10.1177/1477153521990645 2021
[47]

Shi, Y., Hu, J., and Xue, T. (2025). Light, opsins, and life: Mammalian photophysiological functions beyond image perception. Neuron, 113(19), 3108--3128. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2025.05.025

work page doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2025.05.025 2025
[48]

and Boubekri, M

Shishegar, N. and Boubekri, M. (2022). Lighting up living spaces to improve mood and cognitive performance in older adults. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 82, 101845. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101845

work page doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2022.101845 2022
[49]

B., Fadesere, O., and Elendu, D

Sholanke, A. B., Fadesere, O., and Elendu, D. (2021). The role of artificial lighting in architectural design: A literature review. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 665(1), 012008. doi: 10.1088/1755-1315/665/1/012008

work page doi:10.1088/1755-1315/665/1/012008 2021
[50]

ahk\"am\

T\"ahk\"am\"o, L., Partonen, T., and Pesonen, A.-K. (2019). Systematic review of light exposure impact on human circadian rhythm. Chronobiology International, 36(2), 151--170. doi: 10.1080/07420528.2018.1527773

work page doi:10.1080/07420528.2018.1527773 2019
[51]

Vandewalle, G., Maquet, P., and Dijk, D.-J. (2009). Light as a modulator of cognitive brain function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(10), 429--438. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.07.004

work page doi:10.1016/j.tics.2009.07.004 2009
[52]

de Vries, B. (2026). Active inference for physical AI agents: An engineering perspective. arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.20927

work page arXiv 2026
[53]

Wang, S., Sanches de Oliveira, G., Djebbara, Z., and Gramann, K. (2022). The embodiment of architectural experience: A methodological perspective on neuro-architecture. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 16, 833528. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2022.833528

work page doi:10.3389/fnhum.2022.833528 2022
[54]

S., and Nunez, A

Yan, L., Lonstein, J. S., and Nunez, A. A. (2019). Light as a modulator of emotion and cognition: Lessons learned from studying a diurnal rodent. Hormones and Behavior, 111, 78--86. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.09.003

work page doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.09.003 2019
[55]

M., and Dodson, J

Yerkes, R. M., and Dodson, J. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit formation. The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology , 18, 459--482. doi:10.1002/cne.920180503

work page doi:10.1002/cne.920180503 1908
[56]

and Pan, Y

Zhou, A. and Pan, Y. (2023). Effects of indoor lighting environments on paper reading efficiency and brain fatigue: An experimental study. Frontiers in Built Environment, 9, 1303028. doi: 10.3389/fbuil.2023.1303028

work page doi:10.3389/fbuil.2023.1303028 2023
[57]

Zhu, Y., Yang, M., Yao, Y., Xiong, X., Li, X., Zhou, G., and Ma, N. (2019). Effects of illuminance and correlated color temperature on daytime cognitive performance, subjective mood, and alertness in healthy adults. Environment and Behavior, 51(2), 199--230. doi: 10.1177/0013916517738077

work page doi:10.1177/0013916517738077 2019
[58]

Zhu, N., Tu, Y., Wang, L., Zhu, X., and Shi, Y. (2025). The effect of melanopic illuminance of illuminated environment on visual comfort, alertness and cognitive performance during e-book reading. Lighting Research & Technology, XX, 1--27. doi: 10.1177/14771535251351892

work page doi:10.1177/14771535251351892 2025