pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02312 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Recognition: unknown

Should Small-Scale Data Centers Participate in the Day-Ahead Electricity Market?

Enea Figini , Mario Paolone
Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 17:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords data centersday-ahead marketpower purchase agreementrisk-averse biddingworkload flexibilitywaste heat recoverycost reductioncarbon emissions
0
0 comments X

The pith

Small-scale data centers can reduce electricity costs by 22% by participating in the day-ahead market through custom agreements.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a bilateral power purchase agreement that lets small-scale data centers join the day-ahead electricity market. It develops a scenario-based risk-averse bidding strategy that uses flexibility in workload scheduling, local energy resources, and waste heat recovery to lower both costs and emissions. This creates a carbon-aware framework for integration. Case study results show potential savings of 22% compared to standard time-of-use schemes. Further studies examine the effects of flexible workloads and virtual adjustments to grid capacity.

Core claim

By entering a custom power purchase agreement with distribution operators, small-scale data centers can use a scenario-based, risk-averse bidding strategy to participate in the day-ahead market. The strategy minimizes operational costs and carbon emissions by leveraging controllable flexibility in computing workloads, on-site energy systems, and heat recovery. Evaluation against conventional supply schemes demonstrates a 22% cost reduction, with additional cases quantifying the benefits of workload flexibility and virtual de-rating of transfer capacity.

What carries the argument

Scenario-based risk-averse bidding strategy that jointly optimizes costs and emissions using data center operational flexibility.

If this is right

  • Data centers achieve lower energy costs while reducing carbon emissions through market bids.
  • The strategy quantifies cost savings from flexible workload scheduling.
  • Virtual de-rating of grid transfer capacity becomes possible without physical infrastructure changes.
  • Small-scale facilities gain financial opportunities from day-ahead market participation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Similar agreements could help other energy-flexible users like factories or EV fleets enter electricity markets.
  • Grid operators might see improved stability from increased demand-side flexibility in data centers.
  • Adoption could accelerate if regulators simplify such bilateral contracts for smaller entities.

Load-bearing premise

Small-scale data centers have enough controllable flexibility in workloads, local energy resources, and waste heat recovery to bid in the market reliably without operational issues or new investments.

What would settle it

A pilot implementation at a small data center measuring actual electricity cost changes and service reliability when using the proposed bidding strategy over multiple days.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02312 by Enea Figini, Mario Paolone.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic representation of the system. DSO-DCO collaboration. The framework is validated through case studies based on the data of a local academic data center, showing advantages for both parties. III. PROBLEM STATEMENT A. System Description Given the context highlighted in II-A, the system under study is illustrated in view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Ex-post energy supply operational costs and footprint: no WL elasticity view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Distribution of ex-post operational costs and carbon footprint: view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Resource usage and VCC for 18.07.2025, de-rating with WL view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Dispatch for 18.07.2025, no de-rating vs. de-rating with and without view at source ↗
read the original abstract

The global race to artificial intelligence competitive advantage is challenging electricity grids by demanding growing data center capacity. Addressing this challenge requires synergistic operational strategies that integrate data centers into electricity markets while supporting grid operation. This work proposes a bilateral power purchase agreement between small-scale data centers and distribution system operators, enabling data center participation in the day-ahead electricity market. To facilitate market participation, we develop a scenario-based, risk-averse bidding strategy that leverages flexibility from local energy resources, waste heat recovery, and data center workload. The strategy jointly minimizes operational costs and carbon emissions, creating a carbon-aware cost-effective framework for data center integration in the electricity day-ahead market. The method is evaluated on a study case comparing a conventional time-of-use supply scheme with the proposed custom power purchase agreement, showing a potential 22\% cost reduction, thus highlighting financial opportunities for small-scale data centers day-ahead electricity market participation. Two additional case studies illustrate the marginal effects of: (i) data center flexible workload on energy costs and (ii) virtual de-rating of grid transfer capacity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a bilateral power purchase agreement enabling small-scale data centers to participate in the day-ahead electricity market. It develops a scenario-based risk-averse bidding strategy that jointly optimizes workload scheduling, local energy resources, storage, and waste heat recovery to minimize operational costs and carbon emissions. The approach is evaluated on a primary study case showing 22% cost reduction versus conventional time-of-use pricing, plus two supplementary studies on workload flexibility effects and virtual de-rating of grid transfer capacity.

Significance. If the flexibility assumptions hold, the work offers a carbon-aware optimization framework that could unlock financial benefits for small data centers while aiding grid integration. The joint treatment of multiple flexibility sources (IT load, local generation, heat recovery) under risk aversion is a constructive modeling contribution to energy-computing systems. The single stylized case study, however, limits the strength of the quantitative claims without additional validation.

major comments (2)
  1. [§5.1] §5.1 (primary case study): The 22% cost-reduction result is obtained from a single stylized scenario without reported sensitivity analysis on the three key flexibility parameters (fraction of shiftable IT load, marginal cost of local dispatch, and usable heat recovery rate). These parameters directly determine the size of the feasible bidding set; materially lower values would shrink or eliminate the reported savings, rendering the central quantitative claim conditional rather than robust.
  2. [§3] §3 (bidding strategy formulation): The scenario-generation procedure and the precise risk-averse objective (including the risk measure and aversion parameter) are not accompanied by calibration details or bounds derived from measured data-center traces. Because the optimization is feasible only under the modeled flexibility levels, the absence of these elements makes it impossible to assess whether the 22% figure generalizes or is an artifact of the chosen scenarios.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§5] The abstract and §5 would benefit from an explicit statement of the baseline time-of-use tariff parameters and the exact comparison metric (e.g., total energy cost or including carbon pricing) to allow direct reproduction of the 22% figure.
  2. [§2] Notation for the custom PPA and the virtual de-rating constraint could be clarified with a short schematic in §2 to improve readability for readers outside the immediate subfield.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the thorough and constructive review. We address each major comment below and outline revisions to improve the manuscript's robustness and transparency.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§5.1] §5.1 (primary case study): The 22% cost-reduction result is obtained from a single stylized scenario without reported sensitivity analysis on the three key flexibility parameters (fraction of shiftable IT load, marginal cost of local dispatch, and usable heat recovery rate). These parameters directly determine the size of the feasible bidding set; materially lower values would shrink or eliminate the reported savings, rendering the central quantitative claim conditional rather than robust.

    Authors: We agree that the primary case study uses a single stylized scenario and that sensitivity analysis on the key flexibility parameters is needed to substantiate the robustness of the 22% cost reduction. In the revised manuscript we will add a new subsection performing sensitivity analysis on the fraction of shiftable IT load, marginal cost of local dispatch, and usable heat recovery rate. The analysis will show how variations in these parameters affect the size of the feasible bidding set and the resulting cost savings, thereby clarifying the conditions under which the reported benefits hold. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (bidding strategy formulation): The scenario-generation procedure and the precise risk-averse objective (including the risk measure and aversion parameter) are not accompanied by calibration details or bounds derived from measured data-center traces. Because the optimization is feasible only under the modeled flexibility levels, the absence of these elements makes it impossible to assess whether the 22% figure generalizes or is an artifact of the chosen scenarios.

    Authors: We will expand Section 3 to include explicit calibration details for the scenario-generation procedure, the choice of risk measure (CVaR), and the risk-aversion parameter, together with justification drawn from standard values in the energy-systems literature. While the study relies on stylized scenarios based on publicly reported typical data-center profiles rather than proprietary measured traces, we will add explicit bounds and a brief discussion of how deviations from these assumptions would affect outcomes. This will enable readers to evaluate the generalizability of the 22% figure beyond the specific case. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; bidding strategy and case-study savings are simulation outputs, not reductions by construction

full rationale

The paper develops a scenario-based risk-averse bidding strategy that jointly optimizes workload, local resources, and heat recovery, then reports a 22% cost reduction from a stylized case study comparing it to time-of-use supply. This result is an output of the optimization under stated flexibility assumptions rather than a fitted parameter renamed as prediction, a self-defined quantity, or a load-bearing self-citation. No equations or sections reduce the central claim to its own inputs by construction, and the derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract supplies no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The risk-averse bidding strategy implies unstated choices for scenario generation, risk measure, and flexibility modeling, but none are named or quantified here.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5480 in / 1150 out tokens · 59870 ms · 2026-05-08T17:20:03.275529+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 8 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Energy and AI,

    Davide D’Ambrosio, Hugh Hopewell, Vincent Jacamon, Alex Martinos, Nicholas Salmon, and Brent Wanner, “Energy and AI,” Tech. Rep., Apr

  2. [2]

    Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai

    [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/energy-and-ai

  3. [3]

    About the EU Emissions Trading System

    European Commission, “About the EU Emissions Trading System.” [Online]. Available: https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/ carbon-markets/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/about-eu-ets en

  4. [4]

    Europe’s AI ambitions at risk of gridlock

    Ember, “Europe’s AI ambitions at risk of gridlock.” [Online]. Available: https://ember-energy.org/chapter/chapter-1-grids-for-data-centres/

  5. [5]

    Review of Industry Efforts and Standards of Grid Readiness For Data Center Deployment,

    IEEE SA, “Review of Industry Efforts and Standards of Grid Readiness For Data Center Deployment,” Jan. 2026

    2026

  6. [6]

    Considerations for Distributed Edge Data Centers and Use of Building Loads to Support Large Interconnections,

    A. Garg, C. Booten, O. VanGeet, S. Pless, K. Stenger, J. Vidal, R. Jackson, L. Lavin, and K. Prabakar, “Considerations for Distributed Edge Data Centers and Use of Building Loads to Support Large Interconnections,”Renewable Energy, 2025

    2025

  7. [7]

    Grid congestion is posing challenges for energy security and tran- sitions,

    IEA, “Grid congestion is posing challenges for energy security and tran- sitions,” 2025. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/commentaries/ grid-congestion-is-posing-challenges-for-energy-security-and-transitions

    2025

  8. [8]

    Multi-objective robust optimal bidding strategy for a data center operator based on bi-level optimization,

    B. Chen, Y . Che, Z. Zheng, and S. Zhao, “Multi-objective robust optimal bidding strategy for a data center operator based on bi-level optimization,”Energy, vol. 269, p. 126761, Apr

  9. [9]

    Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S036054422300155X

    [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S036054422300155X

  10. [10]

    Optimal Bidding Strategy for Data Center Aggregators Considering Spatio- Temporal Transfer Characteristics,

    P. Zhang, K. Li, F. Wang, Z. Zhen, and T. Wang, “Optimal Bidding Strategy for Data Center Aggregators Considering Spatio- Temporal Transfer Characteristics,” in2020 IEEE/IAS Industrial and Commercial Power System Asia (I&CPS Asia). Weihai, China: IEEE, Jul. 2020, pp. 1667–1675. [Online]. Available: https: //ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9208528/

    work page arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Flexibility from networks of data centers: A market clearing formulation with virtual links,

    W. Zhang, L. A. Roald, A. A. Chien, J. R. Birge, and V . M. Zavala, “Flexibility from networks of data centers: A market clearing formulation with virtual links,”Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 189, p. 106723, Dec. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0378779620305265

    2020

  12. [12]

    Optimal Energy Management of Data Center Micro-Grid Considering Computing Workloads Shift,

    L. Liu, X. Shen, Z. Chen, Q. Sun, and R. Wennersten, “Optimal Energy Management of Data Center Micro-Grid Considering Computing Workloads Shift,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 102 061–102 075, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10606267/

    work page arXiv 2024

  13. [13]

    Minimizing Electricity Cost: Optimization of Distributed Internet Data Centers in a Multi-Electricity- Market Environment,

    L. Rao, X. Liu, L. Xie, and W. Liu, “Minimizing Electricity Cost: Optimization of Distributed Internet Data Centers in a Multi-Electricity- Market Environment,” in2010 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM. San Diego, CA, USA: IEEE, Mar. 2010, pp. 1–9. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5461933/

    work page arXiv 2010

  14. [14]

    Renewable and Cooling Aware Workload Management for Sustainable Data Centers

    Z. Liu, Y . Chen, C. Bash, A. Wierman, D. Gmach, Z. Wang, M. Marwah, and C. Hyser, “Renewable and Cooling Aware Workload Management for Sustainable Data Centers.”

  15. [15]

    Carbon-Aware Computing for Datacenters,

    A. Radovanovi ´c, R. Koningstein, I. Schneider, B. Chen, A. Duarte, B. Roy, D. Xiao, M. Haridasan, P. Hung, N. Care, S. Talukdar, E. Mullen, K. Smith, M. Cottman, and W. Cirne, “Carbon-Aware Computing for Datacenters,”IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 38, no. 2, pp. 1270–1280, Mar. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9770383/

    work page arXiv 2023

  16. [16]

    Carbon-Aware Computing for Data Centers with Probabilistic Performance Guarantees,

    S. Hall, F. Micheli, G. Belgioioso, A. Radovanovi ´c, and F. D ¨orfler, “Carbon-Aware Computing for Data Centers with Probabilistic Performance Guarantees,”IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, pp. 1–14, 2025. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/ 11250739/

    2025

  17. [17]

    Making Data Cen- ters Fit for Demand Response: Introducing GreenSDA and GreenSLA contracts

    Robert Basmadjian, Juan Felipe Botero, Giovanni Giuliani, Xavier Hesselbach, Sonja Klingert, and Hermann de Meer, “Making Data Cen- ters Fit for Demand Response: Introducing GreenSDA and GreenSLA contracts.” 2016

    2016

  18. [18]

    ECOGreen: Electricity Cost Optimization for Green Datacenters in Emerging Power Markets,

    Ali Pahlevan, Marina Zapater, Ayse Coskun, and David Atienza, “ECOGreen: Electricity Cost Optimization for Green Datacenters in Emerging Power Markets,” 2021

    2021

  19. [19]

    Balancing Power Grids and Maximizing Revenue: A Novel Approach to Rebate Auctions for Cloud Workload Migrations,

    A. Abada, M. St-Hilaire, and A. Wei Shi, “Balancing Power Grids and Maximizing Revenue: A Novel Approach to Rebate Auctions for Cloud Workload Migrations,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 172 969–172 979, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/ document/10747803/

    work page arXiv 2024

  20. [20]

    Data centres as a source of flexibility for power systems,

    M. T. Takci, M. Qadrdan, J. Summers, and J. Gustafsson, “Data centres as a source of flexibility for power systems,”Energy Reports, vol. 13, pp. 3661–3671, Jun. 2025. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2352484725001623

    2025

  21. [21]

    Enhancing third-generation district heating networks with data centre waste heat recovery: analysis of a case study in Italy,

    L. Socci, A. Rocchetti, A. Verzino, A. Zini, and L. Talluri, “Enhancing third-generation district heating networks with data centre waste heat recovery: analysis of a case study in Italy,” Energy, vol. 313, p. 134013, Dec. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0360544224037915

    2024

  22. [22]

    Coordinated optimal scheduling of integrated energy system for data center based on computing load shifting,

    J. Wang, H. Deng, Y . Liu, Z. Guo, and Y . Wang, “Coordinated optimal scheduling of integrated energy system for data center based on computing load shifting,”Energy, vol. 267, p. 126585, Mar

  23. [23]

    Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0360544222034727

    [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/ S0360544222034727

  24. [24]

    Experimentally validated pre- design maps and performance estimation methods for small-scale turbopumps for organic rankine cycles,

    S. Zakeralhoseini and J. Schiffmann, “Experimentally validated pre- design maps and performance estimation methods for small-scale turbopumps for organic rankine cycles,”Journal of the Global Power and Propulsion Society, vol. 9, no. May, pp. 17–32, May 2025. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.33737/jgpps/195408

    work page doi:10.33737/jgpps/195408 2025

  25. [25]

    Co-designing electronics with microfluidics for more sustainable cooling,

    R. Van Erp, R. Soleimanzadeh, L. Nela, G. Kampitsis, and E. Matioli, “Co-designing electronics with microfluidics for more sustainable cooling,”Nature, vol. 585, no. 7824, pp. 211–216, Sep. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-020-2666-1

    2020

  26. [26]

    Optimization of conditional value-at-risk,

    R. T. Rockafellar and S. Uryasev, “Optimization of conditional value-at-risk,”The Journal of Risk, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 21–41, 2000. [Online]. Available: http://www.risk.net/journal-of-risk/technical-paper/ 2161159/optimization-conditional-value-risk

    2000

  27. [27]

    Data Center Energy Consumption Modeling: A Survey,

    M. Dayarathna, Y . Wen, and R. Fan, “Data Center Energy Consumption Modeling: A Survey,”IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 732–794, 2016. [Online]. Available: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7279063/

    work page arXiv 2016

  28. [28]

    Design and experimental investigation of a 1 kW organic Rankine cycle system using R245fa as working fluid for low-grade waste heat recovery from steam,

    U. Muhammad, M. Imran, D. H. Lee, and B. S. Park, “Design and experimental investigation of a 1 kW organic Rankine cycle system using R245fa as working fluid for low-grade waste heat recovery from steam,”Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 103, pp. 1089–1100, Oct. 2015. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0196890415006962

    2015

  29. [29]

    Global optimization using special ordered sets,

    E. M. L. Beale and J. J. H. Forrest, “Global optimization using special ordered sets,”Mathematical Programming, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 52–69, Dec. 1976. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10. 1007/BF01580653

    1976

  30. [30]

    M. L. Bynum, G. A. Hackebeil, W. E. Hart, C. D. Laird, B. L. Nicholson, J. D. Siirola, J.-P. Watson, and D. L. Woodruff,Pyomo — Optimization Modeling in Python, ser. Springer Optimization and Its Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021, vol. 67. [Online]. Available: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-68928-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-68928-5 2021

  31. [31]

    The ENTSO-E Transparency Platform – A review of Europe’s most ambitious electricity data platform,

    L. Hirth, J. M ¨uhlenpfordt, and M. Bulkeley, “The ENTSO-E Transparency Platform – A review of Europe’s most ambitious electricity data platform,”Applied Energy, vol. 225, pp. 1054–1067, Sep. 2018. [Online]. Available: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/ pii/S0306261918306068

    2018

  32. [32]

    Emissium Docs

    Emissium, “Emissium Docs.” [Online]. Available: https://docs.emissium. tech

  33. [33]

    Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of CO2,

    K. Rennert, F. Errickson, B. C. Prest, L. Rennels, R. G. Newell, W. Pizer, C. Kingdon, J. Wingenroth, R. Cooke, B. Parthum, D. Smith, K. Cromar, D. Diaz, F. C. Moore, U. K. M ¨uller, R. J. Plevin, A. E. Raftery, H. ˇSevˇc´ıkov´a, H. Sheets, J. H. Stock, T. Tan, M. Watson, T. E. Wong, and D. Anthoff, “Comprehensive evidence implies a higher social cost of ...

    2022

  34. [34]

    Tarife Fernw ¨arme,

    EWB, “Tarife Fernw ¨arme,” Jan. 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www. ewb.ch/angebot/waerme-kaelte/fernwaerme/tarife-fernwaerme.php

    2024

  35. [35]

    The DWD climate predictions website: Towards a seamless outlook based on subseasonal, seasonal and decadal predictions,

    A. Paxian, B. Mannig, M. Tivig, K. Reinhardt, K. Isensee, A. Pasternack, A. Hoff, K. Pankatz, S. Buchholz, S. Wehring, P. Lorenz, K. Fr ¨ohlich, F. Kreienkamp, and B. Fr ¨uh, “The DWD climate predictions website: Towards a seamless outlook based on subseasonal, seasonal and decadal predictions,”Climate Services, vol. 30, p. 100379, Apr. 2023. [Online]. Av...

    2023

  36. [36]

    LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree

    G. Ke, Q. Meng, T. Finley, T. Wang, W. Chen, W. Ma, Q. Ye, and T.-Y . Liu, “LightGBM: A Highly Efficient Gradient Boosting Decision Tree.”

  37. [37]

    Tarifs d’ ´electricit´e

    Romande ´energie, “Tarifs d’ ´electricit´e.” [Online]. Available: https: //www.romande-energie.ch/electricite/votre-electricite#prix

  38. [38]

    Operational and unit costs for RCP,

    EPFL, “Operational and unit costs for RCP,” Sep. 2024. [Online]. Avail- able: https://www.epfl.ch/campus/services/finance/wp-content/uploads/ 2024/09/Grille-RCP-validee-1.pdf

    2024