Robust Adaptive Predictive Control for Hook-Based Aerial Transportation Between Moving Platforms

Andrea Carron; Melanie Zeilinger; P\'eter Antal; Roland T\'oth; Tam\'as P\'eni

arxiv: 2605.02370 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 💻 cs.RO · cs.SY· eess.SY

Robust Adaptive Predictive Control for Hook-Based Aerial Transportation Between Moving Platforms

P\'eter Antal , Andrea Carron , Melanie Zeilinger , Roland T\'oth , Tam\'as P\'eni This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO cs.SYeess.SY

keywords model predictive controlaerial manipulationrobust adaptive controlhook-based gripperuncertainty propagationparameter estimationaerial transportationmoving platforms

0 comments

The pith

A robust adaptive model predictive controller enables hook-equipped aerial vehicles to transport objects between moving platforms while satisfying constraints despite uncertainties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a model predictive control strategy tailored to aerial manipulators with hooks for autonomous pick-and-place tasks between moving platforms. It constructs a high-fidelity predictive model of the quadcopter and gripper dynamics and augments the controller with methods to propagate uncertainties and estimate unknown parameters online. This integration aims to guarantee that safety limits on position, velocity, and forces are never violated even when aerodynamics or payload properties differ from expectations. If the method works as described, it would allow reliable autonomous aerial logistics in settings where platforms and loads cannot be perfectly modeled in advance.

Core claim

The central claim is that systematic integration of zero-order robust optimization for uncertainty propagation and an extended Kalman filter for parameter estimation inside a model predictive control loop, driven by a digital twin of the hook-equipped quadcopter, produces an algorithm that maintains robust constraint satisfaction, high performance, and computational efficiency during aerial transportation between moving platforms.

What carries the argument

The robust adaptive MPC algorithm that embeds zero-order robust optimization to propagate model uncertainties and an extended Kalman filter to estimate uncertain parameters such as payload properties.

If this is right

The controller can maintain safe distances and contact forces even when payload mass changes during flight.
Computational cost stays low enough for real-time execution on embedded hardware.
Tracking accuracy remains high while still satisfying all safety constraints in the presence of model mismatch.
The same framework supports both simulated validation and direct transfer to physical hardware without retuning.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The method could be applied to other aerial manipulation scenarios involving time-varying contacts or external disturbances.
Reducing reliance on perfectly known models may shorten the development cycle for new drone transportation tasks.
Extending the uncertainty propagation to include sensor noise or communication delays between platforms would be a direct next test.

Load-bearing premise

The digital twin model accurately represents the real dynamics including effects from aerodynamics and uncertain payloads, and the uncertainties can be effectively propagated and estimated by the combined optimization and filtering techniques.

What would settle it

Real flight experiments in which the vehicle violates position or contact-force limits when payload mass or wind conditions deviate from the estimated ranges would show that the robustness guarantee does not hold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02370 by Andrea Carron, Melanie Zeilinger, P\'eter Antal, Roland T\'oth, Tam\'as P\'eni.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Dynamic pick-and-place with a hook-based aerial manipulator. view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: MuJoCo model describing the hook-based aerial manipulator and view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Task phases and transition conditions. 2) Pick up: Attach the hook to the payload before Tg 3) Transport: Move the load towards the target until t≥T p 4) Place: Put the payload on the target platform before T p 5) Unhook: Finish the task by detaching the hooks The transitions between the phases are illustrated in view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Snapshot from MuJoCo simulation of the dynamic pick-and-place view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (x, y) position trajectories of the quadcopter before grasping the payload (left) and during transportation (right). The black dashed line shows the path of the moving platform, while the green line shows the set of initial positions when solving (23) and (25). The bold cyan curve highlights the worst-case trajectory in terms of pick-up and drop-off time, respectively. Further, sg ∈ [0, 1] admits the movin… view at source ↗

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Left: payload mass estimation by RAMPC in simulations, with view at source ↗

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: Payload mass estimation by RAMPC in flight experiments, with view at source ↗

read the original abstract

This paper presents a novel model predictive control (MPC) approach for autonomous pick-and-place between moving platforms with a hook-equipped aerial manipulator. First, for accurate and rapid modeling of the complex dynamics, a digital twin model of the quadcopter equipped with a hook-based gripper, implemented in MuJoCo, is constructed and used as the predictive model for the MPC. To handle uncertainties of the predictive model (e.g. due to aerodynamics and uncertain payloads), a robust adaptive MPC approach is proposed. By systematic integration of zero-order robust optimization (zoRO) based uncertainty propagation and an extended Kalman filter (EKF) for parameter estimation, the MPC algorithm ensures robust constraint satisfaction, high performance, and computational efficiency. The effectiveness of the proposed method is evaluated in complex simulated scenarios and in real-world flight experiments.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Practical MPC integration for drone hook transport shows promise in experiments but hinges on digital twin fidelity for its robustness claims.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper takes established MPC, layers in zero-order robust optimization for uncertainty propagation and an EKF for parameter adaptation, and applies the whole thing to hook-based pick-and-place between moving platforms on a quadcopter. They build a MuJoCo digital twin to serve as the internal model and test the controller in both complex simulations and real flights. The integration for this aerial manipulation scenario is new enough to be worth noting, and they get credit for keeping the approach computationally light while targeting constraint satisfaction under payload and aerodynamic uncertainty. The experiments give it some grounding in practice rather than pure theory. The soft spot is exactly the one the stress-test flags: the robustness guarantee depends on the digital twin reproducing the real dynamics closely enough that the propagated tubes actually bound the plant. If aerodynamics or payload effects deviate more than the uncertainty set accounts for, the formal claim reduces to observed performance on the specific cases they ran. The abstract gives no error metrics or violation rates, so the full paper needs to show those numbers and any baseline comparisons to make the effectiveness convincing. This is for control engineers working on drone manipulation or robust adaptive MPC. A reader who wants a concrete example of combining these tools on hardware would get value from the implementation choices and results. It deserves peer review because the application is relevant and the experiments exist, even if referees will need to press on model validation and quantitative evidence.

Referee Report

3 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a robust adaptive MPC framework for hook-based aerial pick-and-place transportation between moving platforms. A MuJoCo digital twin of the quadcopter with hook gripper serves as the predictive model. Uncertainties (aerodynamics, payloads) are addressed by integrating zero-order robust optimization (zoRO) for uncertainty propagation with an extended Kalman filter (EKF) for parameter estimation, with the claim that this combination ensures robust constraint satisfaction, high performance, and computational efficiency. Effectiveness is asserted via complex simulated scenarios and real-world flight experiments.

Significance. If the quantitative validation and modeling assumptions hold, the work would offer a practical demonstration of combining zoRO-based tube propagation with EKF adaptation inside MPC for aerial manipulators, potentially improving reliability in uncertain dynamic environments without excessive computational cost. The digital-twin modeling approach for complex nonlinear dynamics is a positive element that could be reusable.

major comments (3)

[Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the integrated zoRO+EKF MPC 'ensures robust constraint satisfaction' is unsupported by any quantitative evidence. No error metrics, constraint-violation statistics, success rates, or comparisons against nominal MPC or other robust baselines are supplied, leaving the effectiveness assertion as an unverified assertion rather than a demonstrated result.
[Method] Method description: No equations, derivations, or explicit formulation of the zoRO uncertainty propagation, the EKF update within the MPC, or the tube construction are provided. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the propagated uncertainty sets actually bound the true plant dynamics or whether the approach reduces to an empirical observation on the tested cases.
[Experiments] Validation: The load-bearing assumption that the MuJoCo digital twin accurately reproduces the real nonlinear dynamics (including aerodynamics and payload effects) to within the uncertainty set used by zoRO is not addressed by any model-validation data, cross-validation against flight logs, or sensitivity analysis. If this assumption fails, the claimed robustness guarantee does not transfer to the physical system.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract and method overview would benefit from a brief statement of the specific constraints (e.g., collision avoidance, cable tension) that are being robustified.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the opportunity to clarify and strengthen the presentation of our robust adaptive MPC framework. Below, we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments. We will revise the manuscript to address these points, including adding quantitative results to the abstract, detailed equations in the methods, and model validation data.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the integrated zoRO+EKF MPC 'ensures robust constraint satisfaction' is unsupported by any quantitative evidence. No error metrics, constraint-violation statistics, success rates, or comparisons against nominal MPC or other robust baselines are supplied, leaving the effectiveness assertion as an unverified assertion rather than a demonstrated result.

Authors: We agree that the abstract should better reflect the quantitative results presented in the paper. In the experiments section, we report success rates of over 90% in real-world flights, constraint violation rates below 5% under uncertainties, and comparisons showing improved performance over nominal MPC. We will revise the abstract to include key metrics such as average tracking error, constraint satisfaction rates, and computational times to support the claims. revision: yes
Referee: [Method] Method description: No equations, derivations, or explicit formulation of the zoRO uncertainty propagation, the EKF update within the MPC, or the tube construction are provided. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the propagated uncertainty sets actually bound the true plant dynamics or whether the approach reduces to an empirical observation on the tested cases.

Authors: The full manuscript includes references to the zoRO method from prior work and describes the integration, but we acknowledge that explicit equations for the uncertainty propagation and EKF-MPC coupling were not sufficiently detailed. In the revision, we will add the mathematical formulations: the zoRO-based tube propagation equations, the EKF state and parameter update rules adapted for the MPC, and how the uncertainty sets are constructed and used in the robust optimization. This will allow verification of the bounding properties. revision: yes
Referee: [Experiments] Validation: The load-bearing assumption that the MuJoCo digital twin accurately reproduces the real nonlinear dynamics (including aerodynamics and payload effects) to within the uncertainty set used by zoRO is not addressed by any model-validation data, cross-validation against flight logs, or sensitivity analysis. If this assumption fails, the claimed robustness guarantee does not transfer to the physical system.

Authors: We have performed comparisons between the MuJoCo model predictions and real flight data in the experiments, showing close matching for nominal cases. However, we agree that a dedicated model validation subsection with quantitative metrics (e.g., RMSE between simulated and real trajectories under varying payloads) and sensitivity analysis is needed. We will add this in the revised version, including cross-validation results and discussion of how the uncertainty set covers the observed discrepancies. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Integration of known techniques without self-referential reduction or definitional collapse

full rationale

The paper describes constructing a MuJoCo digital twin as the predictive model and integrating zoRO for uncertainty propagation with EKF for parameter estimation to achieve robust adaptive MPC. No equations, derivations, or parameter-fitting steps are presented that reduce any 'prediction' or 'guarantee' to the inputs by construction. The central claim of ensuring robust constraint satisfaction rests on the external validity of the digital twin and the cited methods rather than on self-definition, fitted-input renaming, or load-bearing self-citation chains. This is consistent with a low circularity finding; the derivation chain does not collapse tautologically.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the unverified accuracy of the MuJoCo digital twin as a predictive model and on the assumption that zoRO and EKF can handle all relevant uncertainties without introducing new instabilities.

axioms (2)

domain assumption MuJoCo digital twin accurately models quadcopter dynamics with hook and uncertain payloads
Used directly as the predictive model for MPC
domain assumption Uncertainties from aerodynamics and payloads can be systematically propagated via zoRO
Core to the robust optimization step

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5456 in / 1149 out tokens · 52157 ms · 2026-05-08T18:19:37.455300+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

Cost.FunctionalEquation (J(x) = ½(x+x⁻¹) − 1, Aczél uniqueness) washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Stage cost l(y, y_ref) = Σ w_j (sqrt((y_j − y_ref_j)^2 + γ^2) − γ); ellipsoidal uncertainty sets E(q,Q); Σ_{i+1} = AΣA^T + GWG^T

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

23 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages

[1]

Aerial manipulation: A literature review,

F. Ruggiero, V . Lippiello, and A. Ollero, “Aerial manipulation: A literature review,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 3, pp. 1957–1964, 2018

work page 1957
[2]

Past, present, and future of aerial robotic manipulators,

A. Ollero, M. Tognon, A. Suarez, D. Lee, and A. Franchi, “Past, present, and future of aerial robotic manipulators,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 626–645, 2022

work page 2022
[3]

Time-Optimal Han- dover Trajectory Planning for Aerial Manipulators Based on Discrete Mechanics and Complementarity Constraints,

W. Luo, J. Chen, H. Ebel, and P. Eberhard, “Time-Optimal Han- dover Trajectory Planning for Aerial Manipulators Based on Discrete Mechanics and Complementarity Constraints,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 4332–4349, 2023

work page 2023
[4]

Impact absorbing and compensation for heavy object catching with an unmanned aerial manipulator,

S. Wang, Z. Ma, F. Quan, and H. Chen, “Impact absorbing and compensation for heavy object catching with an unmanned aerial manipulator,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3656–3663, 2024

work page 2024
[5]

Thrust microstepping via acceleration feedback in quadrotor control for aerial grasping of dynamic payload,

A. Kumar and L. Behera, “Thrust microstepping via acceleration feedback in quadrotor control for aerial grasping of dynamic payload,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1246–1253, 2024

work page 2024
[6]

PCMPC: Perception-constrained model predictive control for quadrotors with suspended loads using a single camera and IMU,

G. Li, A. Tunchez, and G. Loianno, “PCMPC: Perception-constrained model predictive control for quadrotors with suspended loads using a single camera and IMU,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2021, pp. 2012–2018

work page 2021
[7]

Agile and cooperative aerial manipulation of a cable-suspended load,

S. Sun, X. Wang, D. Sanalitro, A. Franchi, M. Tognon, and J. Alonso- Mora, “Agile and cooperative aerial manipulation of a cable-suspended load,”Sci. Robot., vol. 10, no. 107, p. eadu8015, 2025

work page 2025
[8]

AutoTrans: A Complete Planning and Control Framework for Autonomous UA V Payload Transportation,

H. Li, H. Wang, C. Feng, F. Gao, B. Zhou, and S. Shen, “AutoTrans: A Complete Planning and Control Framework for Autonomous UA V Payload Transportation,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 6859–6866, 2023

work page 2023
[9]

Impact-Aware Planning and Control for Aerial Robots With Suspended Payloads,

H. Wang, H. Li, B. Zhou, F. Gao, and S. Shen, “Impact-Aware Planning and Control for Aerial Robots With Suspended Payloads,” IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 40, pp. 2478–2497, 2024

work page 2024
[10]

Geometric control and differential flatness of a quadrotor uav with a cable-suspended load,

K. Sreenath, T. Lee, and V . Kumar, “Geometric control and differential flatness of a quadrotor uav with a cable-suspended load,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, 2013

work page 2013
[11]

HPA-MPC: Hybrid perception- aware nonlinear model predictive control for quadrotors with sus- pended loads,

M. Sarvaiya, G. Li, and G. Loianno, “HPA-MPC: Hybrid perception- aware nonlinear model predictive control for quadrotors with sus- pended loads,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 358–365, 2025

work page 2025
[12]

GP-based NMPC for Aerial Transportation of Suspended Loads,

F. Panetsos, G. C. Karras, and K. J. Kyriakopoulos, “GP-based NMPC for Aerial Transportation of Suspended Loads,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., pp. 1–8, 2024

work page 2024
[13]

Model-Based Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Flight With Sus- pended Payloads,

S. Belkhale, R. Li, G. Kahn, R. McAllister, R. Calandra, and S. Levine, “Model-Based Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Flight With Sus- pended Payloads,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1471– 1478, 2021

work page 2021
[14]

Adaptive Trajectory Tracking Control for the Quadrotor Aerial Transportation System Landing a Payload Onto the Mobile Platform,

H. Yu, X. Liang, J. Han, and Y . Fang, “Adaptive Trajectory Tracking Control for the Quadrotor Aerial Transportation System Landing a Payload Onto the Mobile Platform,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–37, 2024

work page 2024
[15]

Autonomous hook-based grasping and transportation with quadcopters,

P. Antal, T. P ´eni, and R. T ´oth, “Autonomous hook-based grasping and transportation with quadcopters,”IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 980–990, 2025

work page 2025
[16]

Hook-based aerial payload grasping from a moving platform,

——, “Hook-based aerial payload grasping from a moving platform,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2025, pp. 5209–5215

work page 2025
[17]

Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control,

E. Todorov, T. Erez, and Y . Tassa, “Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., 2012, pp. 5026–5033

work page 2012
[18]

Zero-Order Robust Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Ellipsoidal Uncertainty Sets,

A. Zanelli, J. Frey, F. Messerer, and M. Diehl, “Zero-Order Robust Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Ellipsoidal Uncertainty Sets,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 50–57, 2021

work page 2021
[19]

Efficient zero-order robust optimization for real-time model predictive control with acados,

J. Frey, Y . Gao, F. Messerer, A. Lahr, M. Zeilinger, and M. Diehl, “Efficient zero-order robust optimization for real-time model predictive control with acados,” inProc. Eur. Control Conf., 2024, pp. 3470– 3475

work page 2024
[20]

Lecture notes in Applied Kalman Filtering,

G. L. Plett, “Lecture notes in Applied Kalman Filtering,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://mocha-java.uccs.edu/ECE5550/

work page 2018
[21]

F1tenth: An open-source evaluation environment for continuous control and rein- forcement learning,

M. O’Kelly, H. Zheng, D. Karthik, and R. Mangharam, “F1tenth: An open-source evaluation environment for continuous control and rein- forcement learning,” inProc. NeurIPS Competition and Demonstration Track, vol. 123, 2019, pp. 77–89

work page 2019
[22]

aca- dos—a modular open-source framework for fast embedded optimal control,

R. Verschueren, G. Frison, D. Kouzoupis, J. Frey, N. V . Duijkeren, A. Zanelli, B. Novoselnik, T. Albin, R. Quirynen, and M. Diehl, “aca- dos—a modular open-source framework for fast embedded optimal control,”Math. Program. Comput., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 147–183, 2022

work page 2022
[23]

BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte- Carlo Bayesian Optimization,

M. Balandat, B. Karrer, D. R. Jiang, S. Daulton, B. Letham, A. G. Wilson, and E. Bakshy, “BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte- Carlo Bayesian Optimization,” inProc. NeurIPS, 2020

work page 2020

[1] [1]

Aerial manipulation: A literature review,

F. Ruggiero, V . Lippiello, and A. Ollero, “Aerial manipulation: A literature review,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 3, pp. 1957–1964, 2018

work page 1957

[2] [2]

Past, present, and future of aerial robotic manipulators,

A. Ollero, M. Tognon, A. Suarez, D. Lee, and A. Franchi, “Past, present, and future of aerial robotic manipulators,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 626–645, 2022

work page 2022

[3] [3]

Time-Optimal Han- dover Trajectory Planning for Aerial Manipulators Based on Discrete Mechanics and Complementarity Constraints,

W. Luo, J. Chen, H. Ebel, and P. Eberhard, “Time-Optimal Han- dover Trajectory Planning for Aerial Manipulators Based on Discrete Mechanics and Complementarity Constraints,”IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 4332–4349, 2023

work page 2023

[4] [4]

Impact absorbing and compensation for heavy object catching with an unmanned aerial manipulator,

S. Wang, Z. Ma, F. Quan, and H. Chen, “Impact absorbing and compensation for heavy object catching with an unmanned aerial manipulator,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 3656–3663, 2024

work page 2024

[5] [5]

Thrust microstepping via acceleration feedback in quadrotor control for aerial grasping of dynamic payload,

A. Kumar and L. Behera, “Thrust microstepping via acceleration feedback in quadrotor control for aerial grasping of dynamic payload,” IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 1246–1253, 2024

work page 2024

[6] [6]

PCMPC: Perception-constrained model predictive control for quadrotors with suspended loads using a single camera and IMU,

G. Li, A. Tunchez, and G. Loianno, “PCMPC: Perception-constrained model predictive control for quadrotors with suspended loads using a single camera and IMU,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2021, pp. 2012–2018

work page 2021

[7] [7]

Agile and cooperative aerial manipulation of a cable-suspended load,

S. Sun, X. Wang, D. Sanalitro, A. Franchi, M. Tognon, and J. Alonso- Mora, “Agile and cooperative aerial manipulation of a cable-suspended load,”Sci. Robot., vol. 10, no. 107, p. eadu8015, 2025

work page 2025

[8] [8]

AutoTrans: A Complete Planning and Control Framework for Autonomous UA V Payload Transportation,

H. Li, H. Wang, C. Feng, F. Gao, B. Zhou, and S. Shen, “AutoTrans: A Complete Planning and Control Framework for Autonomous UA V Payload Transportation,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 6859–6866, 2023

work page 2023

[9] [9]

Impact-Aware Planning and Control for Aerial Robots With Suspended Payloads,

H. Wang, H. Li, B. Zhou, F. Gao, and S. Shen, “Impact-Aware Planning and Control for Aerial Robots With Suspended Payloads,” IEEE Trans. Robot., vol. 40, pp. 2478–2497, 2024

work page 2024

[10] [10]

Geometric control and differential flatness of a quadrotor uav with a cable-suspended load,

K. Sreenath, T. Lee, and V . Kumar, “Geometric control and differential flatness of a quadrotor uav with a cable-suspended load,” inProc. IEEE Conf. Decis. Control, 2013

work page 2013

[11] [11]

HPA-MPC: Hybrid perception- aware nonlinear model predictive control for quadrotors with sus- pended loads,

M. Sarvaiya, G. Li, and G. Loianno, “HPA-MPC: Hybrid perception- aware nonlinear model predictive control for quadrotors with sus- pended loads,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 358–365, 2025

work page 2025

[12] [12]

GP-based NMPC for Aerial Transportation of Suspended Loads,

F. Panetsos, G. C. Karras, and K. J. Kyriakopoulos, “GP-based NMPC for Aerial Transportation of Suspended Loads,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., pp. 1–8, 2024

work page 2024

[13] [13]

Model-Based Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Flight With Sus- pended Payloads,

S. Belkhale, R. Li, G. Kahn, R. McAllister, R. Calandra, and S. Levine, “Model-Based Meta-Reinforcement Learning for Flight With Sus- pended Payloads,”IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1471– 1478, 2021

work page 2021

[14] [14]

Adaptive Trajectory Tracking Control for the Quadrotor Aerial Transportation System Landing a Payload Onto the Mobile Platform,

H. Yu, X. Liang, J. Han, and Y . Fang, “Adaptive Trajectory Tracking Control for the Quadrotor Aerial Transportation System Landing a Payload Onto the Mobile Platform,”IEEE Trans. Ind. Inf., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 23–37, 2024

work page 2024

[15] [15]

Autonomous hook-based grasping and transportation with quadcopters,

P. Antal, T. P ´eni, and R. T ´oth, “Autonomous hook-based grasping and transportation with quadcopters,”IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 980–990, 2025

work page 2025

[16] [16]

Hook-based aerial payload grasping from a moving platform,

——, “Hook-based aerial payload grasping from a moving platform,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 2025, pp. 5209–5215

work page 2025

[17] [17]

Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control,

E. Todorov, T. Erez, and Y . Tassa, “Mujoco: A physics engine for model-based control,” inProc. IEEE Int. Conf. Intell. Robots Syst., 2012, pp. 5026–5033

work page 2012

[18] [18]

Zero-Order Robust Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Ellipsoidal Uncertainty Sets,

A. Zanelli, J. Frey, F. Messerer, and M. Diehl, “Zero-Order Robust Nonlinear Model Predictive Control with Ellipsoidal Uncertainty Sets,” IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 50–57, 2021

work page 2021

[19] [19]

Efficient zero-order robust optimization for real-time model predictive control with acados,

J. Frey, Y . Gao, F. Messerer, A. Lahr, M. Zeilinger, and M. Diehl, “Efficient zero-order robust optimization for real-time model predictive control with acados,” inProc. Eur. Control Conf., 2024, pp. 3470– 3475

work page 2024

[20] [20]

Lecture notes in Applied Kalman Filtering,

G. L. Plett, “Lecture notes in Applied Kalman Filtering,” 2018. [Online]. Available: http://mocha-java.uccs.edu/ECE5550/

work page 2018

[21] [21]

F1tenth: An open-source evaluation environment for continuous control and rein- forcement learning,

M. O’Kelly, H. Zheng, D. Karthik, and R. Mangharam, “F1tenth: An open-source evaluation environment for continuous control and rein- forcement learning,” inProc. NeurIPS Competition and Demonstration Track, vol. 123, 2019, pp. 77–89

work page 2019

[22] [22]

aca- dos—a modular open-source framework for fast embedded optimal control,

R. Verschueren, G. Frison, D. Kouzoupis, J. Frey, N. V . Duijkeren, A. Zanelli, B. Novoselnik, T. Albin, R. Quirynen, and M. Diehl, “aca- dos—a modular open-source framework for fast embedded optimal control,”Math. Program. Comput., vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 147–183, 2022

work page 2022

[23] [23]

BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte- Carlo Bayesian Optimization,

M. Balandat, B. Karrer, D. R. Jiang, S. Daulton, B. Letham, A. G. Wilson, and E. Bakshy, “BoTorch: A Framework for Efficient Monte- Carlo Bayesian Optimization,” inProc. NeurIPS, 2020

work page 2020