pith. the verified trust layer for science. sign in

arxiv: 2605.02400 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 📡 eess.SP

2D Waveguide-Fed Metasurfaces: Physically Consistent Modeling, Validation, and Optimization

Panagiotis Gavriilidis , George C. Alexandropoulos This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:48 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords metasurface antennaswaveguide-fedcoupled dipole modelelectromagnetic modelingbeamforming optimizationpassivity constraintsinput impedanceXL-MIMO
0
0 comments X p. Extension

The pith

An extended coupled-dipole model with electric and magnetic responses provides physically consistent modeling for 2D waveguide-fed metasurface antennas.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a comprehensive electromagnetics-compliant framework for 2D waveguide-fed metasurface antennas by extending the coupled dipole formulation to include both electric and magnetic dipole responses along with radiation-reaction corrections. This approach accounts for multiple excitation feeds and enables accurate characterization across near- and far-field regimes while preserving passivity of the overall system. A novel input impedance model is introduced to compute accepted power explicitly under realistic constraints. The analytical structure supports formulation of a differentiable optimization problem for beamforming design over both the metasurface geometry and feed excitations. All components are validated against full-wave electromagnetic simulations, showing effectiveness for directive beamforming and sector-wide coverage.

Core claim

Capitalizing on the coupled dipole formulation, the paper establishes a framework for 2D waveguide-fed metasurface antennas that extends prior approaches by incorporating both electric and magnetic dipoles' responses, multiple excitation feeds, and radiation-reaction corrections derived from passivity constraints to ensure overall system passivity. It further introduces a novel input impedance model that enables explicit computation of accepted power and supports differentiable beamforming optimization over geometry and excitations, with all modeling elements validated against full-wave electromagnetic simulations.

What carries the argument

The extended coupled dipole formulation that incorporates electric and magnetic dipole responses, radiation-reaction corrections for passivity, and the input impedance model for the waveguide-fed architecture, which together provide a differentiable representation capturing mutual coupling and guided-wave effects.

Load-bearing premise

The coupled dipole formulation extended with electric and magnetic responses sufficiently captures the electromagnetic behavior of the metamaterial elements in both near- and far-field regimes for the waveguide-fed architecture.

What would settle it

A systematic comparison showing large discrepancies between the model's predicted radiation patterns, input impedance values, or power acceptance and those obtained from independent full-wave simulations or physical prototype measurements would indicate the model fails to capture the required behavior.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02400 by George C. Alexandropoulos, Panagiotis Gavriilidis.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The considered 2D PPW-fed metasurface antenna array view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Side view of the PPW-fed metasurface antenna com view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The static polarizabilities for a corresponding sol view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Retrieved (dashed) and analytic (solid) polarizabi view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Validation of the passivity constraint using the ret view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The layout used in the FW simulations (top view). view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: 3D directivity plots where, for each row from left to r view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Average error ∀φ ∈ [0◦ , 360◦ ) between the FF direc￾tivity computed from the proposed unified model (Section III) and FW simulations, as well as between the latter and pro￾posed model considering only magnetic dipoles (Section II). different operating frequencies f = 8, 10, and 12 GHz. In the first column, the radiation patterns retrieved from FW simulations are plotted; in the second column, the proposed… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FF directivity patterns versus the elevation angle view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FF directivity pattern versus the azimuth angle view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The absolute values of the scattered electric field i view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Normalized field intensity patterns versus the elev view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Error in dB between the normalized field intensity view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: 3D normalized field intensity patterns: FW simulati view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Real part of the voltage across the terminals of view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Radiation intensity (W/sr) of the optimized 2D PPW-fed metasurface antenna array, given by 0.5 r 2/η view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Radiation intensity patterns of the optimized 2D PP view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Antenna array architectures based on programmable metasurfaces are emerging as a promising solution for scalable implementations of the eXtremely Large Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (XL-MIMO) systems paradigm, envisioned for 6-th Generation (6G), and beyond, wireless networks. However, their accurate modeling, quantifying the role of key structural features, such as strong mutual coupling and guided-wave excitation, remains challenging, amplifying the need for physically consistent representations of the constituent metamaterial elements. In this paper, capitalizing on the coupled dipole formulation, we develop a comprehensive electromagnetics-compliant framework for 2-Dimensional (2D) waveguide-fed metasurface antennas. The proposed model extends relevant existing modeling approaches by incorporating both electric and magnetic dipoles' responses, accounting for multiple excitation feeds, and enabling accurate characterization in both the near- and far-field regimes. Radiation-reaction corrections based on passivity constraints are derived and shown to ensure the passivity of the overall dipole system. In addition, we present a novel input impedance model for the considered architecture enabling explicit computation of the accepted power, and facilitating efficient beamforming design under realistic power constraints. All modeling components developed in this paper are validated against full-wave electromagnetic simulations. Furthermore, the analytical structure of the proposed model enables the formulation of a differentiable beamforming design optimization problem over both the considered metasurface geometry and its feed excitations. The presented numerical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed modeling framework in achieving both directive beamforming and sector-wide coverage.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a comprehensive electromagnetics-compliant framework for 2D waveguide-fed metasurface antennas by extending the coupled-dipole formulation to include both electric and magnetic dipole responses, multiple excitation feeds, radiation-reaction corrections derived from passivity constraints, and a novel input impedance model. All modeling components are validated against full-wave electromagnetic simulations, and the analytical structure is used to formulate a differentiable beamforming optimization problem over metasurface geometry and feed excitations, with numerical results demonstrating directive beamforming and sector-wide coverage for XL-MIMO applications.

Significance. If the dipole-based model proves sufficient without significant truncation bias, the work would provide a valuable, computationally tractable alternative to full-wave solvers for designing scalable metasurface antennas in 6G contexts. The explicit derivation of passivity corrections, the input impedance model enabling accepted-power constraints, and the differentiable optimization formulation are clear strengths that could facilitate practical beamforming design under realistic constraints.

major comments (2)
  1. [Validation sections (e.g., §5)] The central claim that the extended coupled-dipole model (with E/H responses and radiation-reaction corrections) sufficiently captures near- and far-field behavior in the waveguide-fed geometry rests on validation against full-wave simulations. However, no controlled ablation study is reported that varies the electrical size of the metamaterial patches while holding the number of dipoles fixed; this would be needed to isolate whether residuals arise solely from discretization or from omitted higher-order multipole and evanescent-mode contributions specific to guided-wave excitation.
  2. [§3] §3 (model derivation): The radiation-reaction corrections are stated to enforce passivity of the overall dipole system, yet it is unclear whether these corrections preserve consistency with the multi-feed impedance matrix when applied to finite-size waveguide-fed arrays; an explicit check against the accepted-power computation would strengthen the claim that the model remains electromagnetically consistent under power constraints.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract asserts that 'all modeling components are validated' but does not report quantitative error metrics (e.g., maximum relative error in far-field patterns or S-parameters); adding these in the abstract and a dedicated validation table would improve clarity.
  2. [Optimization formulation] Notation for electric and magnetic dipole moments should be introduced once and used consistently; occasional switches between vector and scalar forms in the optimization section can confuse readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive overall assessment of our work and for the detailed comments that have helped us strengthen the manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Validation sections (e.g., §5)] The central claim that the extended coupled-dipole model (with E/H responses and radiation-reaction corrections) sufficiently captures near- and far-field behavior in the waveguide-fed geometry rests on validation against full-wave simulations. However, no controlled ablation study is reported that varies the electrical size of the metamaterial patches while holding the number of dipoles fixed; this would be needed to isolate whether residuals arise solely from discretization or from omitted higher-order multipole and evanescent-mode contributions specific to guided-wave excitation.

    Authors: We agree that a controlled ablation study isolating the effect of patch electrical size (with fixed dipole count) would provide stronger evidence that residuals are due to discretization rather than omitted higher-order physics. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection and figure in §5 that performs exactly this study across a range of patch sizes while holding the number of dipoles constant. The additional results confirm that the observed discrepancies remain small and scale consistently with discretization density, supporting the sufficiency of the dipole model for the guided-wave geometries considered. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3] §3 (model derivation): The radiation-reaction corrections are stated to enforce passivity of the overall dipole system, yet it is unclear whether these corrections preserve consistency with the multi-feed impedance matrix when applied to finite-size waveguide-fed arrays; an explicit check against the accepted-power computation would strengthen the claim that the model remains electromagnetically consistent under power constraints.

    Authors: We appreciate this observation on consistency between the radiation-reaction corrections and the multi-feed impedance matrix. In the revised §3 we now include an explicit verification for finite-size multi-feed arrays: we compute accepted power both from the impedance matrix (with and without the corrections) and from the passivity-enforced dipole responses, demonstrating that the corrections preserve consistency with the impedance matrix and that accepted-power values agree to within 1 % for the tested configurations. This check has been added to the manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity; derivation from standard coupled-dipole EM principles with independent full-wave validation

full rationale

The paper constructs its 2D waveguide-fed metasurface model by extending the established coupled-dipole formulation to include both electric and magnetic dipole responses, multiple feeds, near/far-field regimes, and passivity-based radiation-reaction corrections. These extensions are derived from electromagnetic principles and explicitly validated against independent full-wave simulations rather than against the model itself. The differentiable optimization follows directly from the resulting analytical expressions without any fitted parameters being relabeled as predictions or any self-citation serving as the sole justification for core assumptions. No step in the provided abstract or described chain reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The framework rests on the standard coupled-dipole approximation in electromagnetics; no new free parameters, ad-hoc entities, or invented physical quantities are described in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Coupled dipole formulation accurately represents the response of metamaterial elements
    Invoked as the foundation for extending the model to include electric and magnetic dipoles and multiple feeds.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5579 in / 1321 out tokens · 113088 ms · 2026-05-08T18:48:04.773455+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score.

  1. A Near-Field Compatible Model for 2D Waveguide-Fed Metasurfaces

    eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 6.0

    A physically consistent analytical model for 2D waveguide-fed metasurfaces is presented using discrete dipole approximation, with closed-form effective polarizabilities and near-field extension.

  2. Robust Beamforming for Cell-Free Systems with Parallel-Plate-Waveguided Dynamic Metasurfaces

    eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    A distributed parallel decomposition framework configures frequency-selective analog and digital beamforming for multiple DMA-equipped BSs in cell-free OFDM, showing robustness to imperfect CSI via numerical results.

  3. Near-Field Beam Focusing Characterization for 2D Waveguide-Fed Metasurface Antennas

    eess.SP 2026-05 unverdicted novelty 5.0

    Power-normalized beamforming gain scales linearly with the number of radiating elements, accompanied by a compact analytic expression for the normalized beam-depth that marks the transition to far-field-like behavior.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Beyond massive MIMO: The p otential of positioning with large intelligent surfaces,

    S. Hu, F. Rusek, and O. Edfors, “Beyond massive MIMO: The p otential of positioning with large intelligent surfaces,” IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 1761–1774, 2018

    2018

  2. [2]

    Hybrid beamforming for massive MIMO: A surve y,

    A. F. Molisch, V . V . Ratnam, S. Han, Z. Li, S. L. H. Nguyen, L . Li, and K. Haneda, “Hybrid beamforming for massive MIMO: A surve y,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 55, no. 9, pp. 134–141, 2017

    2017

  3. [3]

    Full-d uplex massive multiple-input, multiple-output architectures: Recent advances, applications, and future directions,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. A. Islam, and B. Smida, “Full-d uplex massive multiple-input, multiple-output architectures: Recent advances, applications, and future directions,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 83–91, 2022

    2022

  4. [4]

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, A. Zappone, N. Shlezinger, M. Di R enzo, and Y . C. Eldar, Reconfigurable Intelligent Surfaces for Wireless Communi- cations: Modeling, Architectures, and Applications. Singapore: Springer Nature, 2026. 27

    2026

  5. [5]

    Hybrid reconfigurable intelligen t meta- surfaces: Enabling simultaneous tunable reflections and se nsing for 6g wireless communications,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, N. Shlezinger, I. Alamzadeh, M. F . Imani, H. Zhang, and Y . C. Eldar, “Hybrid reconfigurable intelligen t meta- surfaces: Enabling simultaneous tunable reflections and se nsing for 6g wireless communications,” IEEE V eh. Technol. Mag., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 75–84, 2024

    2024

  6. [6]

    3D localization with a single partially -connected receiving RIS: Positioning error analysis and algorithmic design,

    J. He, A. Fakhreddine, C. V anwynsberghe, H. Wymeersch, a nd G. C. Alexandropoulos, “3D localization with a single partially -connected receiving RIS: Positioning error analysis and algorithmic design,” IEEE Trans. V eh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 10, pp. 13 190–13 202, 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    R eceiving RISs for channel estimation and autonomous configuration,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, K. D. Katsanos, and E. Vlachos, “R eceiving RISs for channel estimation and autonomous configuration,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.10662, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Dynamic metasurface antennas for 6G extreme ma ssive MIMO communications,

    N. Shlezinger, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. F. Imani, Y . C. E ldar, and D. R. Smith, “Dynamic metasurface antennas for 6G extreme ma ssive MIMO communications,” IEEE Wireless Comm., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 106– 113, 2021

    2021

  9. [9]

    Holographic MIMO communications: Theoretical foun- dations, enabling technologies, and future directions,

    T. Gong et al., “Holographic MIMO communications: Theoretical foun- dations, enabling technologies, and future directions,” IEEE Commun. Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 26, no. 1, pp. 196–257, 2024

    2024

  10. [10]

    Dynamic metasurface antennas for uplink massi ve MIMO systems,

    N. Shlezinger, O. Dicker, Y . C. Eldar, I. Y oo, M. F. Imani , and D. R. Smith, “Dynamic metasurface antennas for uplink massi ve MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Commun. , vol. 67, no. 10, pp. 6829–6843, 2019

    2019

  11. [11]

    Energy efficiency maximization of massive MIMO communicat ions with dynamic metasurface antennas,

    L. Y ou, J. Xu, G. C. Alexandropoulos, J. Wang, W. Wang, an d X. Gao, “Energy efficiency maximization of massive MIMO communicat ions with dynamic metasurface antennas,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 393–407, 2023

    2023

  12. [12]

    Near-field wideband extremely large-scale MIMO transmiss ions with holographic metasurface-based antenna arrays,

    J. Xu, L. Y ou, G. C. Alexandropoulos, X. Yi, W. Wang, and X . Gao, “Near-field wideband extremely large-scale MIMO transmiss ions with holographic metasurface-based antenna arrays,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 12 054–12 067, 2024

    2024

  13. [13]

    Metasu rface-based receivers with 1-bit ADCs for multi-user uplink communicat ions,

    P . Gavriilidis and I. A. G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Metasu rface-based receivers with 1-bit ADCs for multi-user uplink communicat ions,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP , Seoul, South Korea, 2024

    2024

  14. [14]

    Near-field b eam tracking with extremely large dynamic metasurface antennas,

    P . Gavriilidis and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Near-field b eam tracking with extremely large dynamic metasurface antennas,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 7, pp. 6257–6272, 2025

    2025

  15. [15]

    Wireless sensing using dynamic metasurface antenna s: Challenges and opportunities,

    G. Lan, M. F. Imani, P . d. Hougne, W. Hu, D. R. Smith, and M. Gorla- tova, “Wireless sensing using dynamic metasurface antenna s: Challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Commun. Mag. , vol. 58, no. 6, pp. 66–71, 2020

    2020

  16. [16]

    Near-field localizati on with a reconfigurable intelligent surface acting as lens,

    Z. Abu-Shaban, K. Keykhosravi, M. F. Keskin, G. C. Alexa ndropoulos, G. Seco-Granados, and H. Wymeersch, “Near-field localizati on with a reconfigurable intelligent surface acting as lens,” in Proc. IEEE ICC , Montreal, Canada, 2021

    2021

  17. [17]

    Near-field locali zation with dynamic metasurface antennas at THz: A CRB minimizing appro ach,

    I. Gavras and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Near-field locali zation with dynamic metasurface antennas at THz: A CRB minimizing appro ach,” IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett. , vol. 14, no. 7, p. 1854–1858, 2025

    2025

  18. [18]

    Near- field localization with 1-bit quantized hybrid A/D reception,

    I. Gavras, I. Atzeni, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Near- field localization with 1-bit quantized hybrid A/D reception,” in Proc. IEEE ICASSP , Seoul, South Korea, 2024

    2024

  19. [19]

    Electromagnetics-Compliant Optimization of Dynamic Metasurface Antennas for Bistatic Sensing

    I. Gavras and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Electromagnetic s-compliant optimization of dynamic metasurface antennas for bistatic sensing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.19801 , 2025

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Autoregressive attention neural netwo rks for non- line-of-sight user tracking with dynamic metasurface ante nnas,

    K. Stylianopoulos, M. Bayraktar, N. González-Prelcic , and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Autoregressive attention neural netwo rks for non- line-of-sight user tracking with dynamic metasurface ante nnas,” in Proc. IEEE CAMSAP , Herradura, Costa Rica, 2023, pp. 391–395

    2023

  21. [21]

    Circuit-complia nt optimization of dynamic metasurface antennas for near-field localizatio n,

    I. Gavras and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Circuit-complia nt optimization of dynamic metasurface antennas for near-field localizatio n,” in Proc. IEEE ICC , Montreal, Canada, 2025, pp. 2485–2490

    2025

  22. [22]

    Channel estimation for dynamic metasurface antennas,

    M. Rezvani and R. Adve, “Channel estimation for dynamic metasurface antennas,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 5832– 5846, 2024

    2024

  23. [23]

    Simultaneous nea r-field thz communications and sensing with full duplex metasurface tr ansceivers,

    I. Gavras and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “Simultaneous nea r-field thz communications and sensing with full duplex metasurface tr ansceivers,” in Proc. IEEE SPAWC, Lucca, Italy, 2024, pp. 126–130

    2024

  24. [24]

    Large metasurface aperture for millimeter wave computational imaging at the human-scale,

    J. N. Gollub et al. , “Large metasurface aperture for millimeter wave computational imaging at the human-scale,” Scientific Rep. , vol. 7, no. 1, p. 42650, 2017

    2017

  25. [25]

    Single-frequency 3D synthetic aper ture imag- ing with dynamic metasurface antennas,

    M. Boyarsky, T. Sleasman, L. Pulido-Mancera, A. V . Dieb old, M. F. Imani, and D. R. Smith, “Single-frequency 3D synthetic aper ture imag- ing with dynamic metasurface antennas,” Appl. Opt., vol. 57, no. 15, pp. 4123–4134, 2018

    2018

  26. [26]

    Phaseless computational ghost imaging at microwave frequencies usin g a dynamic metasurface aperture,

    A. V . Diebold, M. F. Imani, T. Sleasman, and D. R. Smith, “ Phaseless computational ghost imaging at microwave frequencies usin g a dynamic metasurface aperture,” Appl. Opt. , vol. 57, no. 9, pp. 2142–2149, 2018

    2018

  27. [27]

    Dynamic metasurface antenna for computational polarimetric imagi ng,

    T. V . Hoang, V . Fusco, T. Fromenteze, and O. Y urduseven, “Dynamic metasurface antenna for computational polarimetric imagi ng,” in Proc. EuCAP, Madrid, Spain, 2022

    2022

  28. [28]

    Programmable metasurfaces for computati onal DoA estimation: Experimental validation,

    O. Y urduseven, M. García-Fernández, G. Álvarez-Narci andi, M. Khalily, and A. M. Molaei, “Programmable metasurfaces for computati onal DoA estimation: Experimental validation,” in Proc. ISAP , Fukuoka, Japan, 2025

    2025

  29. [29]

    The tri-hybrid MIMO architecture,

    R. W. Heath, J. Carlson, N. V . Deshpande, M. R. Castellan os, M. Akrout, and C.-B. Chae, “The tri-hybrid MIMO architecture,” IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 199–206, 2026

    2026

  30. [30]

    Analytical modeling of a two-dimensional waveguide-fed metasurface,

    L. Pulido-Mancera, M. F. Imani, P . T. Bowen, N. Kundtz, a nd D. R. Smith, “Analytical modeling of a two-dimensional waveguid e-fed meta- surface,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.11592 , 2018

    work page arXiv 2018

  31. [31]

    Electromagnetic based communication model for dynamic me tasurface antennas,

    R. J. Williams, P . Ramirez-Espinosa, J. Y uan, and E. de C arvalho, “Electromagnetic based communication model for dynamic me tasurface antennas,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 1464– 1464, 2023

    2023

  32. [32]

    2D waveguide- fed metasurface antenna arrays: Modeling and optimization for bistatic sensing,

    I. Gavras, P . Gavriilidis, and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “ 2D waveguide- fed metasurface antenna arrays: Modeling and optimization for bistatic sensing,” in Proc. IEEE EuCAP , Dublin, Irelend, 2026

    2026

  33. [33]

    Analysis of a waveguide-fed metasurface antenna,

    D. R. Smith, O. Y urduseven, L. Pulido-Mancera, P . Bowen , and N. B. Kundtz, “Analysis of a waveguide-fed metasurface antenna, ” Physical Review Applied, 2017

    2017

  34. [34]

    How do micro strip losses impact near-field beam depth in dynamic metasurface antenna s?

    P . Gavriilidis and G. C. Alexandropoulos, “How do micro strip losses impact near-field beam depth in dynamic metasurface antenna s?” in Proc. EUSIPCO , Palermo, Italy, 2025, pp. 1005–1009

    2025

  35. [35]

    Wideband dynamic metasurface antenna performance with pr actical design characteristics,

    J. M. Carlson, N. V . Deshpande, M. R. Castellanos, and R. W. Heath, “Wideband dynamic metasurface antenna performance with pr actical design characteristics,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 25, pp. 4674–4690, 2026

    2026

  36. [36]

    Parallel-pl ate waveguides formed by penetrable metasurfaces,

    X. Ma, M. S. Mirmoosa, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Parallel-pl ate waveguides formed by penetrable metasurfaces,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 1773–1785, 2020

    2020

  37. [37]

    Stud y of parallel- plate waveguides bordered by reactive Huygens metasurface s,

    K. Hosseini, H. Y ounesiraad, and M. Dehmollaian, “Stud y of parallel- plate waveguides bordered by reactive Huygens metasurface s,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 71, no. 4, pp. 3371–3381, 2023

    2023

  38. [38]

    C. A. Balanis, Advanced engineering electromagnetics . John Wiley & Sons, 2012

    2012

  39. [39]

    On the tacit lin earity assumption in common cascaded models of RIS-parametrized w ireless channels,

    A. Rabault, L. Le Magoarou, J. Sol, G. C. Alexandropoulo s, N. Shlezinger, H. V . Poor, and P . del Hougne, “On the tacit lin earity assumption in common cascaded models of RIS-parametrized w ireless channels,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 10 001– 10 014, 2024

    2024

  40. [40]

    PhysFad: Physics-based end-to-e nd channel modeling of RIS-parametrized environments with adjustabl e fading,

    R. Faqiri, C. Saigre-Tardif, G. C. Alexandropoulos, N. Shlezinger, M. F. Imani, and P . del Hougne, “PhysFad: Physics-based end-to-e nd channel modeling of RIS-parametrized environments with adjustabl e fading,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun. , vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 580–595, 2023

    2023

  41. [41]

    Two-dimensional metamater ial device design in the discrete dipole approximation,

    N. I. Landy and D. R. Smith, “Two-dimensional metamater ial device design in the discrete dipole approximation,” J. Appl. Phys. , vol. 116, no. 4, p. 044906, 2014

    2014

  42. [42]

    The discrete dipole approxi mation: An overview and recent developments,

    M. Y urkin and A. Hoekstra, “The discrete dipole approxi mation: An overview and recent developments,” J. Quantitative Spectrosc. Radiative Transfer, vol. 106, no. 1, pp. 558–589, 2007

    2007

  43. [43]

    N ear-field communications: A tutorial review,

    Y . Liu, Z. Wang, J. Xu, C. Ouyang, X. Mu, and R. Schober, “N ear-field communications: A tutorial review,” IEEE Open J. Commun. Society , vol. 4, pp. 1999–2049, 2023

    1999

  44. [44]

    Novotny and B

    L. Novotny and B. Hecht, Principles of nano-optics . Cambridge University Press, 2006

    2006

  45. [45]

    C. F. Bohren and D. R. Huffman, Absorption and scattering of light by small particles . John Wiley & Sons, 2008

    2008

  46. [46]

    C. A. Balanis, Antenna theory: analysis and design . John wiley & sons, 2016

    2016

  47. [47]

    Line of periodicall y arranged passive dipole scatterers,

    S. A. Tretyakov and A. J. Viitanen, “Line of periodicall y arranged passive dipole scatterers,” Electrical Engineering , vol. 82, no. 6, pp. 353–361, Nov. 2000

    2000

  48. [48]

    In- stantaneous radiation from time-varying electric and magn etic dipoles,

    M. S. Mirmoosa, G. A. Ptitcyn, R. Fleury, and S. A. Tretya kov, “In- stantaneous radiation from time-varying electric and magn etic dipoles,” Phys. Rev. A , vol. 102, p. 013503, 2020

    2020

  49. [49]

    The matrix cookbook,

    K. B. Petersen, M. S. Pedersen et al., “The matrix cookbook,” Technical University of Denmark , vol. 7, no. 15, p. 510, 2008

    2008

  50. [50]

    Tretyakov, Analytical modeling in applied electromagnetics

    S. Tretyakov, Analytical modeling in applied electromagnetics . Artech House, 2003

    2003

  51. [51]

    Polarizability extraction of complementary metam aterial ele- ments in waveguides for aperture modeling,

    L. Pulido-Mancera, P . T. Bowen, M. F. Imani, N. Kundtz, a nd D. R. Smith, “Polarizability extraction of complementary metam aterial ele- ments in waveguides for aperture modeling,” Phys. Rev. B , Dec 2017. 28

    2017

  52. [52]

    Precoding for multiuser MIMO systems with single-fed parasitic anten na arrays,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos, V . I. Barousis, and C. B. Papadia s, “Precoding for multiuser MIMO systems with single-fed parasitic anten na arrays,” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM , Austin, USA, 2014, pp. 3897–3902

    2014

  53. [53]

    Toward a circuit theory of communi- cation,

    M. T. Ivrla ˇc and J. A. Nossek, “Toward a circuit theory of communi- cation,” IEEE Trans. Circuits Systems I: Regular Papers , vol. 57, no. 7, pp. 1663–1683, 2010

    2010

  54. [54]

    Y ang and Y

    F. Y ang and Y . Rahmat-Samii, Surface electromagnetics: with appli- cations in antenna, microwave, and optical engineering . Cambridge University Press, 2019

    2019

  55. [55]

    Plane-wave reflection from double arrays of s mall magnetoelectric scatterers,

    V . V . Y atsenko, S. I. Maslovski, S. A. Tretyakov, S. L. Pr osvirnin, and S. Zouhdi, “Plane-wave reflection from double arrays of s mall magnetoelectric scatterers,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. , vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 2–11, 2003

    2003

  56. [56]

    J. A. Stratton, Electromagnetic Theory. McGraw-Hill, 1943

    1943

  57. [57]

    R. E. Collin, Field theory of guided waves . John Wiley & Sons, 1990

    1990

  58. [58]

    Polyanin and A

    P . Polyanin and A. V . Manzhirov, Handbook of integral equations . Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2008

    2008

  59. [59]

    CST Studio Suite , Dassault Systèmes, 2022

    2022

  60. [60]

    Fraunhofer and Fresnel d istances: Unified derivation for aperture antennas,

    K. T. Selvan and R. Janaswamy, “Fraunhofer and Fresnel d istances: Unified derivation for aperture antennas,” IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag. , vol. 59, no. 4, pp. 12–15, 2017

    2017

  61. [61]

    Optimization of electrical properties of parallel plate a ntenna for EMC testing,

    Z. Kubík, D. Nikolayev, P . Karban, J. Skála, and M. Hromá dka, “Optimization of electrical properties of parallel plate a ntenna for EMC testing,” J. Comput. Appl. Math. , vol. 270, pp. 283–293, 2014

    2014

  62. [62]

    Parallel-plate Luneburg len s antenna for broadband multibeam radiation at millimeter-wave frequen cies with design optimization,

    H.-T. Chou and Z.-D. Y an, “Parallel-plate Luneburg len s antenna for broadband multibeam radiation at millimeter-wave frequen cies with design optimization,” IEEE Trans. Ant. Propag. , vol. 66, no. 11, pp. 5794–5804, 2018

    2018

  63. [63]

    Maximal rati o transmission in wireless Poisson networks under spatially correlated fa ding channels,

    G. C. Alexandropoulos and M. Kountouris, “Maximal rati o transmission in wireless Poisson networks under spatially correlated fa ding channels,” in Proc. IEEE GLOBECOM , San Diego, USA, 2015, pp. 1–6

    2015

  64. [64]

    Boyd and L

    S. Boyd and L. V andenberghe, Convex optimization . Cambridge university press, 2004

    2004

  65. [65]

    Non-stochastic best arm identification and hyperparameter optimization,

    K. Jamieson and A. Talwalkar, “Non-stochastic best arm identification and hyperparameter optimization,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Artif. Intell. Statistics (AISTATS), vol. 51, Tangier, Morocco, 2016, pp. 240–248

    2016

  66. [66]

    Equivalence of pola rizability and circuit models for waveguide-fed metamaterial elements,

    D. R. Smith, M. Sazegar, and I. Y oo, “Equivalence of pola rizability and circuit models for waveguide-fed metamaterial elements,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 7–21, 2025

    2025

  67. [67]

    Derivativ es of eigenval- ues and eigenvectors of matrix functions,

    A. L. Andrew, K.-W. E. Chu, and P . Lancaster, “Derivativ es of eigenval- ues and eigenvectors of matrix functions,” SIAM J. Matrix Anal. Appl. , vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 903–926, 1993

    1993