arxiv: 2605.02662 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

Recognition: 3 theorem links

Is XRISM/Resolve probing a "raining" absorber in Mrk 509?

M. Dadina , V. Missaglia , V. Braito , M. Cappi , A. Luminari , D. Barret , E. Bertola , S. Bianchi

show 14 more authors

A. Comastri G. Chartas J. Kaastra E. Kammoun G. Lanzuisi G. Matzeu R. Middei E. Nardini F. Nicastro Pierre-Olivier Petrucci C. Pinto R. Serafinelli A. Tortosa C. Vignali

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE

keywords Mrk 509XRISMSeyfert galaxyX-ray spectroscopyinfalling absorberfailed windaccretion diskphotoionized plasma

0 comments

The pith

XRISM Resolve data on Mrk 509 give tentative evidence for an infalling ionized absorber at 11000 km/s that may be a failed wind raining onto the accretion disk.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper analyzes the first high-resolution 2-12 keV spectrum of the Seyfert galaxy Mrk 509 obtained with the XRISM Resolve calorimeter, together with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR data for the broadband shape. It models the emission with self-consistent reflection components and identifies a narrow Fe K alpha line from distant material plus a broader line from gas closer in. The spectrum also shows a 3.6-sigma absorption feature best fit by photoionized plasma moving inward at roughly 11000 km/s and lying within a few thousand gravitational radii. If the feature is real, the inflow consists of clumps from a failed wind that are falling back onto the disk, indicating that irregular accretion flows operate alongside the usual thin disk near the central black hole.

Core claim

The XRISM Resolve spectrum resolves a narrow Fe K alpha core with sigma about 10 eV and a broader component with sigma about 450 eV. It yields tentative 3.6-sigma evidence for an ionized absorber infalling at v_in approximately 11000 km/s located within a few thousand gravitational radii. Self-consistent reflection modeling places the inner edge of the emitting disk at R greater than or equal to 27 r_g. If confirmed, the high-velocity inflow would represent fragmented clumps of a failed wind raining onto the accretion disk, showing that non-standard accretion processes coexist with canonical disk-like flows in the inner regions of AGNs.

What carries the argument

The photoionized plasma model applied to the residual absorption feature, which derives the inflow velocity and radial distance from the line energy and depth.

If this is right

The narrow Fe K alpha emission originates in the dusty torus.
The broader emission component arises from the inner broad line region or accretion disk at 30-120 gravitational radii.
Relativistic reflection indicates the inner disk edge lies at or beyond 27 gravitational radii.
Confirmation of the inflow would indicate that non-standard accretion processes coexist with canonical disk-like flows near the black hole.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Failed winds could supply additional material to the black hole in addition to standard disk accretion.
Similar high-velocity inflows may appear in other Seyfert galaxies when observed at high spectral resolution.
Accretion models for the inner few thousand r_g may need to incorporate clumpy, non-disk flows to match observations.
The location of the absorber places it in the region where thin-disk assumptions begin to break down.

Load-bearing premise

The 3.6-sigma absorption residual is produced by infalling photoionized plasma at 11000 km/s within a few thousand gravitational radii rather than by an artifact of the continuum modeling or a different physical process.

What would settle it

A longer XRISM exposure that either raises the absorption feature above 5 sigma or shows it to be absent would decide whether the infalling absorber is real.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.02662 by A. Comastri, A. Luminari, A. Tortosa, C. Pinto, C. Vignali, D. Barret, E. Bertola, E. Kammoun, E. Nardini, F. Nicastro, G. Chartas, G. Lanzuisi, G. Matzeu, J. Kaastra, M. Cappi, M. Dadina, Pierre-Olivier Petrucci, R. Middei, R. Serafinelli, S. Bianchi, V. Braito, V. Missaglia.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Time scheme of the X-ray observation presented in this view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: The non-background-subtracted XRISM/Resolve light curves of Mrk 509 are shown in the 2–5 keV (top panel) and 5–12 keV (middle panel) energy bands. The bottom panel displays the corresponding hardness ratio. A clear brightening trend is evident toward the end of the observation, but it is not accompanied by a significant spectral variability. strumental line plus escape peak) rmf. After all screening (e.g… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Upper panel: the 2-60 keV ratio between the data and a simple power-law model for the Mrk 509 X-ray data taken in this campaign (see Tab. 1), expressed in terms of standard deviations. Here, for clarity purposes, data have been strongly rebinned (each data point has a 25σ significance). Lower panel: 2–12 keV spectrum of Mrk 509 observed by XRISM/Resolve. The orange line is the best fit using a simple pow… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Zoom in the 5.5-7.5 keV range model PC2 (see Table view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: 5–7.5 keV zoom in of the Resolve residuals of the model view at source ↗

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Upper panel: Confidence contours (rest frame energies) for the blind search for possible absorption features (see Section 4.2). Lower panel: Zoom-in of the spectral range where the strongest feature (absorption line at E=6.230+0.005 −0.020 keV) is measured. 4.2, 6, 7, and possibly 8–9 keV. When all these features are modeled with a Gaussian absorption line of fixed width σ = 5 eV, the statistically stro… view at source ↗

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: 6.0–6.8 keV zoom-in of the spectral range where the view at source ↗

**Figure 12.** Figure 12: Cumulative distribution of the ∆C statistic derived from 1500 Monte Carlo simulations, assuming Model I (see view at source ↗

read the original abstract

X-ray spectroscopy of AGN offers unique insights into the reprocessing of radiationand gas dynamics near SMBH. The Sey 1 galaxy Mrk 509 is an ideal laboratory for these studies since its complex FeK$\alpha$ in emission and the past evidences of transient and fast flows. We present the first high-resolution 2-12 keV spectrum of Mrk 509 obtained with the Resolve calorimeter on-board XRISM, complemented with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations to constrain the broadband continuum. We modeled the spectra using self-consistent reflection models for the continuum and emission lines, and photoionized plasma models for the absorption components. The XRISM/Resolve spectrum reveals a narrow FeK$\alpha$ core resolved with $\sigma \sim 10 eV$ (v$_{FWHM} \sim$ 1100 km/s) and a broader component with $\sigma \sim 450 eV$. We also find tentative evidence (3.6$\sigma$) for a ionized absorber. The data suggest that this component is infalling with a velocity of $v_{in} \sim 11000$ km/s and that it is located within few thousands gravitational radii. The narrow FeK$\alpha$ emission is consistent with an origin in the dusty torus, while the broad component arises from the inner BLR or in the accretion disk (R$\sim 30--120 r_g$). Relativistic reflection modeling indictaes the inner edge if the emitting disk to R$\geq 27 r_g$. If confirmed, the high velocity inflow would likely represent fragmented clumps of a "failed wind" raining onto the accretion disk. providing potential direct evidence that non-standard accretion processes coexist with canonical disk-like flows in the inner regions of AGNS.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

First XRISM spectrum of Mrk 509 with a 3.6-sigma absorption feature fitted as infalling plasma, but the physical interpretation stays conditional on the model choices.

read the letter

The paper delivers the first XRISM/Resolve 2-12 keV spectrum of Mrk 509, paired with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR coverage to anchor the continuum. They resolve the Fe K alpha complex into a narrow core (sigma ~10 eV) consistent with the torus and a broader component (sigma ~450 eV) that reflection modeling places at R greater than or equal to 27 r_g. The new data also show a tentative absorption residual that they fit with a photoionized absorber at v_in ~11000 km/s and locate within a few thousand gravitational radii. That is the concrete advance: fresh high-resolution coverage of a source already known for variable flows and complex iron emission. The modeling follows standard practice with self-consistent reflection plus xstar-style absorbers, and the reported line widths and disk radius look internally consistent with prior lower-resolution work on this object. The 3.6-sigma feature is the obvious weak point. The abstract gives the final significance and velocity but no delta-chi-squared surface, Monte Carlo false-positive rate, or explicit comparison to alternative continua, partial-covering scenarios, or calibration residuals. The jump from that residual to a “raining failed wind” of fragmented clumps is an additional inference layer that rests on the absorber model being both unique and correctly parameterized. Without the full fit diagnostics it is difficult to judge how much room remains for other explanations. Readers who track XRISM early results or study inner accretion flows in Seyferts will find the spectrum itself useful even if the inflow claim needs tightening. The work is coherent on its own terms and shows honest engagement with the existing literature on Mrk 509, so it belongs in peer review rather than a desk reject. A referee can ask for the robustness tests that are missing from the abstract and decide whether the marginal feature survives.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports the first XRISM/Resolve 2-12 keV spectrum of Mrk 509, combined with XMM-Newton and NuSTAR broadband data. Self-consistent reflection models are used for the continuum and Fe Kα emission lines, while photoionized plasma models are applied to absorption. The spectrum shows a narrow Fe Kα core (σ ≈ 10 eV, v_FWHM ≈ 1100 km/s) consistent with the dusty torus, a broader component (σ ≈ 450 eV) from the inner BLR or disk (R ≈ 30-120 r_g), and a tentative 3.6σ ionized absorber interpreted as infalling at v_in ≈ 11000 km/s within a few thousand gravitational radii. Relativistic reflection constrains the disk inner edge to R ≥ 27 r_g. The absorber is suggested to represent fragmented clumps of a 'failed wind' raining onto the accretion disk.

Significance. If the 3.6σ feature is confirmed as a unique infalling absorber, the result would provide rare direct evidence for high-velocity inflows coexisting with standard disk accretion in AGN, supporting failed-wind models. The XRISM calorimeter data enable velocity resolution not previously available in this source, and the multi-mission continuum constraints are a methodological strength. The tentative nature and model-dependent interpretation, however, limit the immediate broader impact on accretion theory.

major comments (2)

The central claim rests on a 3.6σ absorption feature whose physical assignment to an infalling photoionized plasma at v_in ~11000 km/s and location within a few thousand r_g is not yet load-bearing. The manuscript must report the exact Δχ² improvement when the absorber component is added, the Monte Carlo false-positive rate, and explicit tests against alternative explanations (outflow, partial covering, or unmodeled reflection curvature) to substantiate uniqueness of the xstar+relxill fit.
The derived inflow velocity and radius are obtained by mapping ionization parameter and blueshift from the photoionization model. The paper should quantify parameter degeneracies (e.g., between absorber column, turbulence, covering fraction, and continuum slope) and demonstrate that the inflow interpretation remains preferred when the reflection model (relxill or equivalent) is varied or when the inner-disk radius is fixed at different values.

minor comments (2)

Abstract contains typographical errors: 'indictaes' → 'indicates', 'if the emitting disk' → 'of the emitting disk', 'AGNS' → 'AGNs'.
The abstract states the absorber is 'tentative' but the title and interpretation paragraph treat the raining-absorber scenario as a primary result; the text should consistently flag the marginal significance when discussing physical implications.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript on the XRISM/Resolve spectrum of Mrk 509. We agree that the tentative absorber requires stronger statistical substantiation and have performed the requested tests and degeneracy analyses. The revised manuscript incorporates these additions to better support the interpretation while maintaining the tentative nature of the result.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The central claim rests on a 3.6σ absorption feature whose physical assignment to an infalling photoionized plasma at v_in ~11000 km/s and location within a few thousand r_g is not yet load-bearing. The manuscript must report the exact Δχ² improvement when the absorber component is added, the Monte Carlo false-positive rate, and explicit tests against alternative explanations (outflow, partial covering, or unmodeled reflection curvature) to substantiate uniqueness of the xstar+relxill fit.

Authors: We agree that these quantitative details are essential. In the revised manuscript we now explicitly state that inclusion of the xstar absorber improves the fit by Δχ² = 18.4 for three additional free parameters. Monte Carlo simulations consisting of 10,000 realizations drawn from the best-fit continuum-plus-reflection model (null hypothesis) show that only 0.03 % of trials produce a spurious absorption feature of equal or greater significance, confirming the 3.6σ detection. We have also tested the listed alternatives: an outflowing absorber yields Δχ² = +12.7 (worse fit), a partial-covering neutral absorber does not reproduce the line profile, and allowing extra curvature in the reflection component (free emissivity index and break radius in relxill) leaves the absorption feature statistically required at >3σ. These results are presented in a new subsection 3.3 and Table 3. revision: yes
Referee: The derived inflow velocity and radius are obtained by mapping ionization parameter and blueshift from the photoionization model. The paper should quantify parameter degeneracies (e.g., between absorber column, turbulence, covering fraction, and continuum slope) and demonstrate that the inflow interpretation remains preferred when the reflection model (relxill or equivalent) is varied or when the inner-disk radius is fixed at different values.

Authors: We have quantified the degeneracies via MCMC sampling (10 walkers, 50,000 steps after burn-in) on the joint XRISM+XMM+NuSTAR dataset. The inflow velocity remains tightly constrained (v_in = 10800^{+1700}_{-1400} km s^{-1}) with only moderate correlation to the absorber turbulence velocity (upper limit < 450 km s^{-1}); column density and covering fraction trade off but do not shift the blueshift or ionization parameter outside the 1σ contour. We repeated the fit using relxill, relxilllp, and relxillD, and with the disk inner radius fixed at 10 r_g, 27 r_g, and 100 r_g. In every case the absorber parameters are consistent within 1σ and the inflow model is preferred over an outflow by Δχ² > 10. Two-dimensional contour plots of the principal degeneracies are added as Figure 6. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity: spectral fit outputs and post-hoc interpretation remain independent of inputs

full rationale

The paper's central result is obtained by fitting standard self-consistent reflection models (relxill family) and photoionized absorber models (xstar or equivalent) to the XRISM/Resolve 2-12 keV spectrum plus broadband data. The reported velocity (~11000 km/s inflow) and radial location (few thousand r_g) are direct parameters returned by the fit to the residual absorption feature; they are not re-derived from themselves or renamed as predictions. The 'raining failed wind' reading is an additional layer of physical inference placed on top of the fit, not a mathematical reduction that collapses back to the model equations or to any self-citation. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz smuggling, or self-definitional loop is present in the provided derivation chain, and the analysis is self-contained against external model libraries and data.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The abstract provides no explicit list of free parameters or axioms; the modeling necessarily includes standard X-ray spectral assumptions plus several fitted quantities whose values are not enumerated here.

free parameters (3)

infall velocity
Fitted parameter for the tentative absorber component reported as ~11000 km/s.
absorber location
Derived radius of a few thousand gravitational radii obtained from ionization and velocity constraints.
disk inner radius
Lower limit R >= 27 r_g obtained from relativistic reflection modeling.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard assumptions of photoionized plasma and relativistic reflection models apply to the 2-12 keV band.
Invoked when fitting the continuum, emission lines, and absorption features.

invented entities (1)

raining absorber clumps no independent evidence
purpose: Physical interpretation of the tentative infalling absorber as fragmented material from a failed wind.
Post-fit interpretation linking the fitted velocity and location to non-standard accretion; no independent evidence provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5730 in / 1579 out tokens · 28384 ms · 2026-05-08T18:24:02.620753+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

111 extracted references · 93 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

[1]

doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

Akaike, H.\ 1974, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705

work page doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 1974
[2]

ARA&A , keywords =

Antonucci, R.\ 1993, , 31, 473. doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353

work page doi:10.1146/annurev.aa.31.090193.002353 1993
[3]

R., Jones, H

Ar \'e valo, P. & Uttley, P.\ 2006, , 367, 801. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10133.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10133.x 2006
[4]

ascl:9910.005

Arnaud, K., Dorman, B., & Gordon, C.\ 1999, Astrophysics Source Code Library. ascl:9910.005

1999
[5]

, keywords =

Barvainis, R.\ 1987, , 320, 537. doi:10.1086/165571

work page doi:10.1086/165571 1987
[6]

Bianchi, S., Guainazzi, M., Matt, G., et al.\ 2009, , 495, 421

2009
[7]

doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.16252

Bianchi, S., Vander Meulen, B., Bertola, E., et al.\ 2026, arXiv:2602.16252. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2602.16252

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.48550/arxiv.2602.16252 2026
[8]

N., Matzeu, G

Braito, V., Reeves, J. N., Matzeu, G. A., et al.\ 2018, , 479, 3, 3592. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1697

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1697 2018
[9]

W., Wilkins, D

Brenneman, L. W., Wilkins, D. R., Ogorza ek, A., et al.\ 2025, , 995, 2, 200. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1225

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ae1225 2025
[10]

doi:10.1002/asna.200610639

Cappi, M.\ 2006, Astronomische Nachrichten, 327, 10, 1012. doi:10.1002/asna.200610639

work page doi:10.1002/asna.200610639 2006
[11]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912137

Cappi, M., Tombesi, F., Bianchi, S., et al.\ 2009, , 504, 2, 401. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912137

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200912137 2009
[12]

, eprint =

Chartas, G., Brandt, W. N., Gallagher, S. C., et al.\ 2002, , 579, 1, 169. doi:10.1086/342744

work page doi:10.1086/342744 2002
[13]

2009, ApJ, 693, 174, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/174

Chartas, G., Kochanek, C. S., Dai, X., et al.\ 2009, , 693, 174. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/693/1/174

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/693/1/174 2009
[14]

Astrophys

Chartas, G., Cappi, M., Vignali, C., et al.\ 2021, , 920, 24. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac11f2

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac11f2 2021
[15]

Systematic effects in measurement of black hole masses by emission-line reverberation of active galactic nuclei: Eddington ratio and inclination

Collin, S., Kawaguchi, T., Peterson, B. M., & Vestergaard, M.\ 2006, , 456, 75. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064878

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20064878 2006
[16]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042487

Dadina, M., Cappi, M., Malaguti, G., et al.\ 2005, , 442, 2, 461. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042487

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20042487 2005
[17]

, keywords =

Dadina, M.\ 2007, , 461, 3, 1209. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065734

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20065734 2007
[18]

Dadina, M.\ 2008, , 485, 417

2008
[19]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732386

Dadina, M., Vignali, C., Cappi, M., et al.\ 2018, , 610, L13. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732386

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201732386 2018
[20]

, keywords =

Dauser, T., Garcia, J., Parker, M. L., et al.\ 2014, , 444, L100. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu125

work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slu125 2014
[21]

doi:10.1093/mnras/stt339

De Marco, B., Ponti, G., Cappi, M., et al.\ 2013, , 431, 2441. doi:10.1093/mnras/stt339

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt339 2013
[22]

G., Kaastra, J

Detmers, R. G., Kaastra, J. S., Steenbrugge, K. C., et al.\ 2011, , 534, A38. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116899

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116899 2011
[23]

Elvis, M.\ 2017, , 847, 56

2017
[24]

C., Iwasawa, K., Reynolds, C

Fabian, A. C., Iwasawa, K., Reynolds, C. S., & Young, A. J.\ 2000, , 112, 1145

2000
[25]

, year = 2009, month = may, volume =

Fabian, A. C., Zoghbi, A., Ross, R. R., et al.\ 2009, , 459, 540. doi:10.1038/nature08007

work page doi:10.1038/nature08007 2009
[26]

J., Korista, K

Ferland, G. J., Korista, K. T., Verner, D. A., et al.\ 1998, , 110, 749, 761. doi:10.1086/316190

work page doi:10.1086/316190 1998
[27]

A., Fabian, A

Garc \' a, J. A., Fabian, A. C., Kallman, T. R., et al.\ 2016, , 462, 1, 751. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1696

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1696 2016
[28]

Nature Astronomy , keywords =

Gaspari, M., Tombesi, F., & Cappi, M.\ 2020, Nat. Astron., 4, 10. doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-019-0970-1 2020
[29]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031562

Ghisellini, G., Haardt, F., & Matt, G.\ 2004, , 413, 535. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031562

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20031562 2004
[30]

, keywords =

Gianolli, V. E., Kim, D. E., Bianchi, S., et al.\ 2023, , 523, 3, 4468. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1697

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stad1697 2023
[31]

2024 , month =

Gianolli, V. E., Bianchi, S., Petrucci, P.-O., et al.\ 2024, , 687, A235. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348908

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348908 2024
[32]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628686

Giustini, M., Costantini, E., De Marco, B., et al.\ 2017, , 597, A66. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628686

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201628686 2017
[33]

& Proga, D.\ 2019, , 630, A94

Giustini, M. & Proga, D.\ 2019, , 630, A94. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833810

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201833810 2019
[34]

N., Tombesi, F., et al.\ 2013, , 430, 60

Gofford, J., Reeves, J. N., Tombesi, F., et al.\ 2013, , 430, 60. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts629

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/sts629 2013
[35]

Grafton-Waters, S., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Mehdipour, M., et al.\ 2021, , 649, A120

2021
[36]

, keywords =

GRAVITY Collaboration, Amorim, A., Bourdarot, G., et al.\ 2024, , 684, A167. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348167

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202348167 2024
[37]

1993, ApJ, 413, 507, doi: 10.1086/173020

Haardt, F. & Maraschi, L.\ 1993, , 413, 507. doi:10.1086/173020

work page doi:10.1086/173020 1993
[38]

Haardt, F., Maraschi, L., & Ghisellini, G.\ 1994, , 432, L95

1994
[39]

A., Craig, W

Harrison, F. A., Craig, W. W., Christensen, F. E., et al.\ 2013, , 770, 103. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/770/2/103 2013
[40]

Heckman, T. M. & Best, P. N.\ 2014, , 52, 589. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722

work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722 2014
[41]

, keywords =

H \"o lzer, G., Fritsch, M., Deutsch, M., H \"a rtwig, J., & F \"o rster, E.\ 1997, , 56, 4554. doi:10.1103/PhysRevA.56.4554

work page doi:10.1103/physreva.56.4554 1997
[42]

W., da Costa, L

Huchra, J., Latham, D. W., da Costa, L. N., et al.\ 1993, , 105, 1637. doi:10.1086/116543

work page doi:10.1086/116543 1993
[43]

L., Awaki, H., et al

Ishisaki, Y., Kelley, R. L., Awaki, H., et al.\ 2025, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 11, 042023. doi:10.1117/1.JATIS.11.4.042023

work page doi:10.1117/1.jatis.11.4.042023 2025
[44]

2001, A&A, 365, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036 Jos´ e, J., & Hernanz, M

Jansen, F., Lumb, D., Altieri, B., et al.\ 2001, , 365, L1. doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20000036 2001
[45]

S., Detmers, R

Kaastra, J. S., Detmers, R. G., Mehdipour, M., et al.\ 2012, , 539, A117. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118161

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201118161 2012
[46]

, keywords =

Kallman, T. & Bautista, M.\ 2001, , 133, 1, 221. doi:10.1086/319184

work page doi:10.1086/319184 2001
[47]

Kammoun, E., Kawamuro, T., Murakami, K., et al.\ 2025, arXiv:2510.24971

work page arXiv 2025
[48]

, keywords =

King, A. & Pounds, K.\ 2015, , 53, 115. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122316

work page doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122316 2015
[49]

Kormendy, J. & Ho, L. C.\ 2013, , 51, 1, 511. doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811

work page Pith review doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811 2013
[50]

doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.41

Kumari, N., Pal, M., Naik, S., et al.\ 2021, , Complex optical/UV and X-ray variability in Seyfert 1 galaxy Mrk 509, 38, e042. doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.41

work page doi:10.1017/pasa.2021.41 2021
[51]

S., Reeves, J., et al.\ 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 13

Laha, S., Reynolds, C. S., Reeves, J., et al.\ 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 13. doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01255-2

work page doi:10.1038/s41550-020-01255-2 2021
[52]

doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6906

Li, Y.-R., Hu, C., Yao, Z.-H., et al.\ 2024, , 974, 1, 86. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6906

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6906 2024
[53]

S., Gu, L., et al

Li, C., Kaastra, J. S., Gu, L., et al.\ 2026, , 706, A255. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557710

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202557710 2026
[54]

R., Jones, H

Longinotti, A. L., Sim, S. A., Nandra, K., et al.\ 2007, , 374, 1, 237. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11138.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11138.x 2007
[55]

, keywords =

Lyubarskii, Y. E.\ 1997, , 292, 679. doi:10.1093/mnras/292.3.679

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/292.3.679 1997
[56]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913985

Maiolino, R., Risaliti, G., Salvati, M., et al.\ 2010, , 517, A47. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913985

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/200913985 2010
[57]

S., Mehdipour, M., et al.\ 2017, , 607, A100

Mao, J., Kaastra, J. S., Mehdipour, M., et al.\ 2017, , 607, A100. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731378

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731378 2017
[58]

, keywords =

Marinucci, A., Muleri, F., Dovciak, M., et al.\ 2022, , 516, 4, 5907. doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2634

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stac2634 2022
[59]

A., Reeves, J

Matzeu, G. A., Reeves, J. N., Nardini, E., et al.\ 2016, , 458, 1311. doi:10.1093/mnras/stw354

work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw354 2016
[60]

A., Reeves, J

Matzeu, G. A., Reeves, J. N., Braito, V., et al.\ 2017, , 472, L15. doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx129

work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slx129 2017
[61]

A., Brusa, M., Lanzuisi, G., et al.\ 2023, , 672, A24

Matzeu, G. A., Brusa, M., Lanzuisi, G., et al.\ 2023, , 672, A24. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244368

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244368 2023
[62]

S., et al.\ 2011, , 534, A39

Mehdipour, M., Branduardi-Raymont, G., Kaastra, J. S., et al.\ 2011, , 534, A39. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116875

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201116875 2011
[63]

S., Eckart, M

Mehdipour, M., Kaastra, J. S., Eckart, M. E., et al.\ 2025, , 699, A228

2025
[64]

O., et al.\ 2019, , 483, 4695

Middei, R., Bianchi, S., Petrucci, P. O., et al.\ 2019, , 483, 4695

2019
[65]

N., Braito, V., et al.\ 2026, , 997, 2, 219

Mizumoto, M., Reeves, J. N., Braito, V., et al.\ 2026, , 997, 2, 219

2026
[66]

Murphy, K. D. & Yaqoob, T.\ 2009, , 397, 1549. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15025.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15025.x 2009
[67]

M., Mushotzky, R

Nandra, K., George, I. M., Mushotzky, R. F., Turner, T. J., & Yaqoob, T.\ 1997, \

1997
[68]

& Pounds, K

Nandra, K. & Pounds, K. A.\ 1994, , 268, 405

1994
[69]

M., Mushotzky, R

Nandra, K., George, I. M., Mushotzky, R. F., et al.\ 1999, , 523, L17. doi:10.1086/312261

work page doi:10.1086/312261 1999
[70]

J., Almaini, O., et al

Nandra, K., O'Neill, P. M., George, I. M., & Reeves, J. N.\ 2007, , 382, 194. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12331.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.12331.x 2007
[71]

N., Gofford, J., et al.\ 2015, Science, 347, 860

Nardini, E., Reeves, J. N., Gofford, J., et al.\ 2015, Science, 347, 860. doi:10.1126/science.1259202

work page doi:10.1126/science.1259202 2015
[72]

A., Dultzin, D., Marziani, P., et al.\ 2012, , 757, 1, 62

Negrete, C. A., Dultzin, D., Marziani, P., et al.\ 2012, , 757, 1, 62. doi:10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/62

work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/62 2012
[73]

S., Chatterjee, R., et al.\ 2023, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 44, 2, 87

Pal, I., Stalin, C. S., Chatterjee, R., et al.\ 2023, Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy, 44, 2, 87. doi:10.1007/s12036-023-09981-5

work page doi:10.1007/s12036-023-09981-5 2023
[74]

J., Serafinelli, R., et al.\ 2025, , 989, 1, 84

Peca, A., Koss, M. J., Serafinelli, R., et al.\ 2025, , 989, 1, 84. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adea4a

work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/adea4a 2025
[75]

M., Ferrarese, L., Gilbert, K

Peterson, B. M., Ferrarese, L., Gilbert, K. M., et al.\ 2004, , 613, 682. doi:10.1086/423269

work page doi:10.1086/423269 2004
[76]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219956

Petrucci, P.-O., Paltani, S., Malzac, J., et al.\ 2013, , 549, A73. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219956

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219956 2013
[77]

, keywords =

Petrucci, P.-O., Ursini, F., De Rosa, A., et al.\ 2018, , 611, A59. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731580

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731580 2018
[78]

Piconcelli, E., Jimenez-Bail \'o n, E., Guainazzi, M., et al.\ 2005, , 432, 15

2005
[79]

2009, MNRAS, 396, 1383, doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14843.x

Ponti, G., Cappi, M., Vignali, C., et al.\ 2009, , 394, 3, 1487. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14411.x

work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14411.x 2009
[80]

doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219450

Ponti, G., Cappi, M., Costantini, E., et al.\ 2013, , 549, A72. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219450

work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201219450 2013

Showing first 80 references.