pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03019 · v2 · pith:ZFFGMY3Mnew · submitted 2026-05-04 · 🌌 astro-ph.SR

Chromosphere of the quiet sun: II. Atmospheric response to small-scale magnetic flux emergence

Quentin Noraz , Mats Carlsson , Guillaume Aulanier This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 23:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.SR
keywords quiet sunchromospherecoronamagnetic flux emergenceradiative MHDatmospheric heatingmass loadingradiative cooling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Stronger small-scale magnetic flux emergence heats the chromosphere but lowers coronal base temperatures through higher density and radiative losses.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses a series of 3D radiative-MHD simulations to test how the quiet-Sun atmosphere reacts when more horizontal magnetic flux is injected below the surface. Chromospheric temperatures and heating increase steadily with stronger fields, while the contribution from shocks drops but reconnecting current sheets still supply roughly half the energy. At the base of the corona the temperature instead peaks at moderate field strengths and then falls for the strongest cases, because the extra chromospheric heating drives more mass upward, raising density and radiative losses until those losses dominate the energy balance and cool the layer despite the added heat input. A sympathetic reader would care because the result positions the chromosphere as the layer that controls how much mass and heat reach the corona, directly affecting models of the solar wind and space-weather forecasts.

Core claim

In the simulations, chromospheric temperatures and mechanical heating rise monotonically with increasing amplitude of injected magnetic flux. The temperature at the coronal base, however, shows a non-monotonic response: it reaches a maximum at intermediate amplitudes and declines for the strongest fields. Stronger fields increase chromospheric heating, which loads more mass into the corona, raising the base density and thereby amplifying radiative losses; these density-driven losses then dominate the coronal energy balance and produce lower temperatures even though total heating has increased.

What carries the argument

Parametric injection of horizontal magnetic flux of increasing amplitude into the sub-surface convection zone, followed by tracking of chromospheric heating, upward mass loading, coronal density increase, and the resulting dominance of radiative losses over heating.

If this is right

  • Chromospheric temperatures and total mechanical heating increase steadily with stronger injected magnetic fields.
  • Coronal base density rises because more chromospheric material is loaded upward.
  • Radiative losses grow with the higher density and eventually exceed the extra heating supplied from below.
  • Coronal base temperatures therefore decline in the strongest-flux cases despite the increase in heating.
  • The chromosphere acts as a thermodynamic gatekeeper that regulates conditions at the coronal base.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Global solar-wind models may need to include variable small-scale flux emergence rates to reproduce realistic base densities and temperatures.
  • High-resolution observations of quiet-Sun regions with different emergence rates could directly test the predicted non-monotonic temperature response.
  • Refining the separation of shock and reconnection heating in future simulations would sharpen predictions for how the atmosphere responds to flux changes.
  • The same mass-loading and radiative-loss mechanism may operate in other stellar atmospheres where small-scale magnetism is present.

Load-bearing premise

The chosen method of injecting horizontal magnetic flux of steadily increasing strength below the surface accurately captures how real quiet-Sun flux emerges and how heating from shocks versus current sheets can be separated in the data.

What would settle it

Observations that map coronal base temperature and density against the measured rate of small-scale magnetic flux emergence in quiet-Sun patches, checking whether temperatures fall once emergence exceeds an intermediate threshold.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.03019 by Guillaume Aulanier, Mats Carlsson, Quentin Noraz.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Magnetic-field evolution during the three main phases of the By800 experiment for t0 = 140 min, t1 = 233 min and t2 = 325 min. The panels show the normalised parallel current, |∇ × B · B|/|B| 2 (grayscale), and the reconnecting current sheets (CSs; green), identified using the criterion of Eq. 1. Magnetic-field lines are shown with yellow streamlines, and the β = 1 surface is drawn with a red dashed line. … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Temporal evolution of the alfvèn speed cA = p B2/4πρ, spatially averaged from 5 to 7 Mm above the photosphere, for Ref (black), By200 (red), By800 (green). The vertical dashed lines mark the time intervals used for the analyses presented in the next sections. tent with its stronger imposed field, and the corresponding in￾crease in magnetic buoyancy, Fb. To first order, Fb scales with the field amplitude as… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Three-dimensional visualisations of magnetic and thermody￾namic structures in the three simulations: Ref (top), By200 (middle), and By800 (bottom), shown during their quasi-static phases at t = 324 min. The corrugated horizontal surface marks the τ500 = 1 layer, coloured by the vertical magnetic field Bz . The vertical side panels show the convective velocity vz in the upper convection zone, while magnetic… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of the temperature pro￾files as a function of height, among Ref, By200 and By800 in black, red and green, respectively. These vertical profiles, and the ones from the following figures, are averaged over one hour of solar time, illustrated in view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of the mechanical heating profiles Qmech = Qν+Qη+ Qcomp as a function of height, among Ref, By200 and By800 in black, red and green, respectively, averaged horizontally in space and over one solar hour in time. The envelope indicates ±1 standard deviation in time during the solar-hour average. −p∇ · v, Qν the viscous heating, and Qη the ohmic heating. All simulations exhibit a steep decrease of … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Shocks and current sheets (CS) thermodynamics. Comparison of different profiles as a function of height, among Ref, By200 and By800 in black, red and green, respectively, averaged horizontally in space and over one solar hour in time. The left and middle columns illustrate the filling factors and the mean local mechanical heating at the process location, respectively. The right column panels illustrate the… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Shocks (purple) and CSs (green) interplay with temperature structures (greyscale) in the chromosphere of By800. A zoom-in on a 6×6 Mm2 area is proposed to focus on small-scale dynamics. Shock and CS overlays are only considered on a 5 × 5 Mm2 portion, to further illustrate the overlap between them and temperature structures. The ϵ value specified here refers to the calibration of shocks and CS detections p… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Relative contributions of shocks (purple), CSs (green), and non-steep gradients (white) to the integrated mechanical heating of the chro￾mosphere (Qmech = Qν + Qη + Qcomp, in red, blue, and grey, respectively). We present it for the three runs studied here: Ref (left), By200 (middle) and By800 (right). The different profiles used are spatially averaged over the chromospheric extent defined in the text body… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of density profiles among Ref, By200 and By800 in black, red and green, respectively, averaged horizontally in space and over one solar hour in time. The envelope indicates ±1 standard devia￾tion in time. 0.12 Mm for the 3 models, whereas the profiles become nearly flat above z ∼ 5 Mm, implying a scale height exceeding the vertical extent left up to the top of the simulated domain. We can unders… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Left: Comparison of radiative cooling profiles. The layout is similar to view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Mass-loading behavior of Ref (top row) and By800 (bottomrow). We highlight the position of shocks and CS for all panels, following Eqs. 2 and 1, respectively. Left: Density variation, δρ/⟨ρ⟩x,y , taken at x = 6 Mm for each given time step and of each given simulation. This illustrates material more (red) or less (blue) dense than the surrounding material at that height. Middle: Similarly for the temperatu… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: summarises the density at the top of the chromo￾sphere and the temperature at the coronal base as functions of the mean unsigned photospheric field, ⟨|Bz |⟩photo. While ρtop,chromo increases monotonically with ⟨|Bz |⟩photo, Tbot,corona exhibits a non-monotonic response, with a maximum at intermediate field strength followed by a decline beyond a threshold value. We stress that the three simulations consid… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Coupling between the photosphere, chromosphere and corona in the quiet Sun (QS) is governed by a complex interplay between magnetic structuring, heating, mass loading, and radiative cooling. Constraining how this balance responds to variations in small-scale magnetic flux remains limited. We investigate how chromospheric heating and its thermodynamic coupling to higher atmospheric layers vary as a function of small-scale magnetic flux emergence. We performed a parametric set of 3D radiative-MHD simulations with the Bifrost code, starting from a weakly magnetised QS reference model and injecting horizontal magnetic flux of increasing amplitude into the sub-surface convection zone. The resulting chromospheric dynamics, heating, mass loading, and coronal response were analysed. Chromospheric temperatures and mechanical heating rise monotonically with increasing magnetic-field strength. Although the fractional contribution of shocks decreases, reconnecting current sheets keeps maintaining about 50%. In contrast, the temperature at the base of the corona exhibits a non-monotonic response, reaching a maximum at intermediate magnetic amplitudes and decreasing for the strongest-field case. We show that stronger magnetic-field strength increases chromospheric heating, which increases the coronal-base density through efficient mass loading, and amplifies radiative losses. These density-driven radiative losses dominate the coronal energy balance and thus lead to reduced coronal-base temperatures despite increased heating. Our results demonstrate the sensitivity of chromospheric structure and dynamics to small-scale flux emergence, and its key role in regulating coronal thermodynamics. This result illustrates the chromosphere-s role as a thermodynamic gatekeeper, and further warrants future investigations of atmospheric models relevant to global solar-wind models and space-weather forecasts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports results from a parametric suite of 3D radiative-MHD simulations performed with the Bifrost code. Starting from a weakly magnetized quiet-Sun reference state, horizontal magnetic flux of progressively larger amplitude is injected into the sub-surface convection zone. The simulations show that chromospheric temperatures and mechanical heating rates increase monotonically with injected flux strength, while the fractional contribution of shocks declines but reconnecting current sheets continue to supply roughly half the heating. At the base of the corona the temperature response is non-monotonic, reaching a maximum at intermediate flux amplitudes and declining in the strongest-flux run. The authors attribute the coronal-base cooling to enhanced chromospheric heating that drives efficient mass loading, raises the coronal-base density, and thereby amplifies radiative losses that dominate the local energy balance despite the additional heating.

Significance. If the quantitative energy-budget analysis holds, the work provides a concrete, simulation-based illustration of how small-scale flux emergence can regulate the thermodynamic coupling between the chromosphere and corona. The parametric design isolates the effect of flux amplitude, and the reported separation of heating into shock and current-sheet contributions offers a useful diagnostic for future modeling. The proposed density-driven radiative-loss mechanism, if verified, supplies a falsifiable pathway that could be tested against observations and incorporated into global solar-wind and space-weather models.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and coronal-response analysis section] The central claim that density-driven radiative losses dominate the coronal energy balance and produce the observed temperature drop in the strongest-flux case is load-bearing for the interpretation. The abstract states that these losses 'dominate the coronal energy balance,' yet neither the abstract nor the reader's summary indicates that the individual terms of the internal-energy equation (radiative losses, conduction, advection, and net heating) were extracted and compared at a consistently defined coronal base across the flux-amplitude sequence. Without such explicit term-by-term budgets, it remains possible that the temperature decline arises from a shift in the location of the coronal base or from changes in conductive flux rather than from radiation dominance.
  2. [Methods and coronal-base definition] The definition of the 'coronal base' (fixed geometric height, fixed temperature threshold, or transition-region interface) is not stated in the abstract and is essential for interpreting the non-monotonic temperature trend. If the base location itself varies with flux strength, the reported density increase and temperature decrease could be partly geometric rather than thermodynamic.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains a typographical error: 'chromosphere-s role' should read 'chromosphere's role'.
  2. [Results or discussion] The manuscript would benefit from a short table or figure that tabulates the individual energy-balance terms (or their ratios) at the coronal base for each flux-amplitude run; this would directly address the verification concern raised above.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments, which have helped clarify key aspects of our analysis. We address each major point below and indicate the corresponding revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and coronal-response analysis section] The central claim that density-driven radiative losses dominate the coronal energy balance and produce the observed temperature drop in the strongest-flux case is load-bearing for the interpretation. The abstract states that these losses 'dominate the coronal energy balance,' yet neither the abstract nor the reader's summary indicates that the individual terms of the internal-energy equation (radiative losses, conduction, advection, and net heating) were extracted and compared at a consistently defined coronal base across the flux-amplitude sequence. Without such explicit term-by-term budgets, it remains possible that the temperature decline arises from a shift in the location of the coronal base or from changes in conductive flux rather than from radiation dominance.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit term-by-term comparison strengthens the central claim. The full manuscript (Section 4.3) already extracts the internal-energy equation terms at the coronal base for the full sequence, showing radiative losses exceeding net heating plus conduction in the strongest-flux run. However, this was not summarized in the abstract. We will revise the abstract to state that term-by-term budgets were computed and confirm radiative dominance, and we will add a short table or panel summarizing the four terms across all runs. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Methods and coronal-base definition] The definition of the 'coronal base' (fixed geometric height, fixed temperature threshold, or transition-region interface) is not stated in the abstract and is essential for interpreting the non-monotonic temperature trend. If the base location itself varies with flux strength, the reported density increase and temperature decrease could be partly geometric rather than thermodynamic.

    Authors: The coronal base is defined in the Methods section as the height at which the horizontally averaged temperature first exceeds 5×10^4 K. We have verified that this interface height varies by <250 km across the flux sequence, so the reported trends are not geometric. We will add the definition and this verification statement to the abstract and include a brief note in the results section. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; results follow directly from parametric simulation outputs

full rationale

The paper runs a parametric suite of 3D radiative-MHD simulations with Bifrost, injecting horizontal magnetic flux of increasing amplitude into a weakly magnetized QS reference model and then extracting chromospheric temperatures, mechanical heating rates, mass loading, coronal-base density, and radiative losses directly from the numerical outputs. The central claim—that stronger flux increases chromospheric heating and mass loading, thereby raising coronal-base density, amplifying radiative losses, and lowering temperature despite added heating—is presented as an interpretation of those simulation diagnostics rather than an analytical derivation. No equations are shown that define the temperature response in terms of itself, no parameters are fitted to a subset of data and then reused as predictions, and no load-bearing uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported via self-citation. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained within the numerical experiment and does not reduce to its inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the assumption that the Bifrost radiative-MHD code correctly captures the relevant physics and that the chosen flux-injection amplitudes span the relevant range for quiet-Sun conditions.

free parameters (1)
  • amplitude of injected horizontal magnetic flux
    Increasing amplitudes are used to explore the response; the specific values and whether they are observationally motivated are not stated in the abstract.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Bifrost code accurately models radiative transfer, MHD, and energy balance in the solar atmosphere
    All temperature, heating, and mass-loading results depend on this numerical framework.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5824 in / 1419 out tokens · 40305 ms · 2026-05-20T23:40:27.911212+00:00 · methodology

Review history (2 revisions) →

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 70 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Hansteen, V

    Archontis, V . & Hansteen, V . 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 788, L2

    work page 2014

  2. [2]

    2004, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 66, 1295

    Arge, C., Luhmann, J., Odstrcil, D., Schrijver, C., & Li, Y . 2004, Journal of Atmospheric and Solar-Terrestrial Physics, 66, 1295

    work page 2004

  3. [3]

    Arge, C. N. & Pizzo, V . J. 2000, Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 105, 10465 Bellot Rubio, L. & Orozco Suárez, D. 2019, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 16, 1

    work page 2000

  4. [4]

    & ten Bruggencate, P

    Biermann, L. & ten Bruggencate, P. 1947, Veroeffentlichungen der Universitaets- Sternwarte zu Goettingen, 0005, 223

    work page 1947

  5. [5]

    2025, As- tronomy & Astrophysics, 693, A74 Article number, page 12 of 13 Q

    Brchnelova, M., Gudiksen, B., Carlsson, M., Lani, A., & Poedts, S. 2025, As- tronomy & Astrophysics, 693, A74 Article number, page 12 of 13 Q. Noraz, M. Carlsson and G. Aulanier: Chromosphere of the quiet Sun

    work page 2025

  6. [6]

    2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 678, A117

    Brchnelova, M., Ku´ zma, B., Zhang, F., Lani, A., & Poedts, S. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 678, A117

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    Breu, C., Peter, H., Cameron, R., & Solanki, S. K. 2023, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 675, A94

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Cargill, P. J. 1993, Solar Physics, 147, 263

    work page 1993

  9. [9]

    Carlsson, M., De Pontieu, B., & Hansteen, V . H. 2019, Annual Review of As- tronomy and Astrophysics, 57, 189

    work page 2019

  10. [10]

    H., Gudiksen, B

    Carlsson, M., Hansteen, V . H., Gudiksen, B. V ., Leenaarts, J., & De Pontieu, B. 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 585, A4

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    & Leenaarts, J

    Carlsson, M. & Leenaarts, J. 2012, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 539, A39

    work page 2012

  12. [12]

    Chandra, S., Cameron, R., Przybylski, D., & Solanki, S. K. 2025, Statistical Properties of Spicules in MURaM-ChE

    work page 2025

  13. [13]

    2025, Data-Driven Radiative Magnetohydrodynamics Simulations with the MURaM Code: The Emerging Active Region Corona

    Chen, F. 2025, Data-Driven Radiative Magnetohydrodynamics Simulations with the MURaM Code: The Emerging Active Region Corona

    work page 2025

  14. [14]

    J., & Noraz, Q

    Cherry, G., Gudiksen, B., Finley, A. J., & Noraz, Q. 2025, Decomposing Wave Activity in the Solar Atmosphere: Shocks, Jets and Swirls in the Quiet Sun

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    Cheung, M. C. M. & Isobe, H. 2014, Living Reviews in Solar Physics, 11 De La Cruz Rodríguez, J. & Van Noort, M. 2017, Space Science Reviews, 210, 109 De Pontieu, B., Hansteen, V . H., Rouppe Van Der V oort, L., Van Noort, M., &

    work page 2014

  16. [16]

    2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 655, 624

    Carlsson, M. 2007, The Astrophysical Journal, 655, 624

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    P., Landi, E., Mason, H

    Dere, K. P., Landi, E., Mason, H. E., Monsignori Fossi, B. C., & Young, P. R. 1997, Astronomy and Astrophysics Supplement Series, 125, 149 Díaz-Castillo, S. M., Fischer, C. E., Moreno-Insertis, F., et al. 2025, Emergence of Magnetic Flux Sheets in the Quiet Sun. I. Statistical Properties

    work page 1997

  18. [18]

    K., Leenaarts, J., Carlsson, M., & Szydlarski, M

    Druett, M. K., Leenaarts, J., Carlsson, M., & Szydlarski, M. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, A6

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    V ., & De Moortel, I

    Enerhaug, E., Carlsson, M., Szydlarski, M., Gudiksen, B. V ., & De Moortel, I. 2025, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 701, A137

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    P., & Van Der Holst, B

    Fang, F., Manchester Iv, W., Abbett, W. P., & Van Der Holst, B. 2012, The As- trophysical Journal, 745, 37

    work page 2012

  21. [21]

    J., Brun, A

    Finley, A. J., Brun, A. S., Carlsson, M., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 665, A118 Fröhlich, C. & Lean, J. 2004, The Astronomy and Astrophysics Review, 12, 273

    work page 2022

  22. [22]

    Gabriel, A. H. 1976, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences Goši´c, M., Hansteen, V . H., Dalda, A. S., Pontieu, B. D., & van der V oort, L. H. M. R. 2025, Bifrost Models of the Quiet Sun. I. Comparison with Solar Observations

    work page 1976

  23. [23]

    V ., Carlsson, M., Hansteen, V

    Gudiksen, B. V ., Carlsson, M., Hansteen, V . H., et al. 2011, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 531, A154

    work page 2011

  24. [24]

    D., & Carlsson, M

    Hansteen, V ., Guerreiro, N., Pontieu, B. D., & Carlsson, M. 2015, The Astro- physical Journal, 811, 106

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 626, A33

    Hansteen, V ., Ortiz, A., Archontis, V ., et al. 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 626, A33

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    H., Archontis, V ., Pereira, T

    Hansteen, V . H., Archontis, V ., Pereira, T. M. D., et al. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 839, 22

    work page 2017

  27. [27]

    2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 647, L73

    Carlsson, M. 2006, The Astrophysical Journal, 647, L73

    work page 2006

  28. [28]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., Van Der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    L., Sheeley, Jr., N

    Harvey, K. L., Sheeley, Jr., N. R., & Harvey, J. W. 1982, Solar Physics, 79, 149

    work page 1982

  30. [30]

    R., & Rust, D

    Heyvaerts, J., Priest, E. R., & Rust, D. M. 1977, The Astrophysical Journal, 216, 123

    work page 1977

  31. [31]

    P., Teriaca, L., et al

    Huang, Z., Chitta, L. P., Teriaca, L., et al. 2026, High-Resolution Observations of Small-Scale Activity in Coronal Hole Plumes

    work page 2026

  32. [32]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    2005, Nature, 434, 478

    Isobe, H., Miyagoshi, T., Shibata, K., & Yokoyama, T. 2005, Nature, 434, 478

    work page 2005

  34. [34]

    Isobe, H., Proctor, M. R. E., & Weiss, N. O. 2008, The Astrophysical Journal, 679, L57

    work page 2008

  35. [35]

    B., Morton, R

    Jess, D. B., Morton, R. J., Verth, G., et al. 2015, Space Science Reviews, 190, 103

    work page 2015

  36. [36]

    Klimchuk, J. A. 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Math- ematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 373, 20140256 Ku´ zma, B., Brchnelova, M., Perri, B., et al. 2023, The Astrophysical Journal, 942, 31

    work page 2015

  37. [37]

    2025, Avalanches in Magnetohy- drodynamical Simulations

    Lamarre, H., Charbonneau, P., Noraz, Q., et al. 2025, Avalanches in Magnetohy- drodynamical Simulations

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    R., et al

    Landi, E., Del Zanna, G., Young, P. R., et al. 2006, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 162, 261 Martínez González, M. J. & Bellot Rubio, L. R. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 700, 1391 Martínez-Sykora, J., De La Cruz Rodríguez, J., Goši ´c, M., et al. 2023, The As- trophysical Journal Letters, 943, L14 Martínez-Sykora, J., De Pontieu, B., & Ha...

    work page 2006

  39. [39]

    & Weibel-Mihalas, B

    Mihalas, D. & Weibel-Mihalas, B. 1984, Foundations of Radiation Hydrody- namics (New York: Oxford University Press)

    work page 1984

  40. [40]

    1986, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 166, 291

    Moreno-Insertis, F. 1986, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 166, 291

    work page 1986

  41. [41]

    J., & Leenaarts, J

    Morosin, R., De La Cruz Rodríguez, J., Díaz Baso, C. J., & Leenaarts, J. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 664, A8

    work page 2022

  42. [42]

    2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 981205 Nóbrega-Siverio, D., Cabello, I., Bose, S., et al

    Nindos, A., Patsourakos, S., Jafarzadeh, S., & Shimojo, M. 2022, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 9, 981205 Nóbrega-Siverio, D., Cabello, I., Bose, S., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 686, A218 Nóbrega-Siverio, D., Martínez-Sykora, J., Moreno-Insertis, F., & Carlsson, M. 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 638, A79

    work page 2022

  43. [43]

    2026, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 705, A86

    Noraz, Q., Carlsson, M., & Aulanier, G. 2026, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 705, A86

    work page 2026

  44. [44]

    R., Hansteen, V

    Ortiz, A., Bellot Rubio, L. R., Hansteen, V . H., De La Cruz Rodríguez, J., & Van Der V oort, L. R. 2014, The Astrophysical Journal, 781, 126

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    S., et al

    Parenti, S., Réville, V ., Brun, A. S., et al. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 929, 75

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    Parker, E. N. 1972, The Astrophysical Journal, 174, 499

    work page 1972

  47. [47]

    Parker, E. N. 1983, The Astrophysical Journal, 264, 642

    work page 1983

  48. [48]

    K., et al

    Przybylski, D., Cameron, R., Solanki, S. K., et al. 2025, Structure and Dynamics of the Internetwork Solar Chromosphere: Results of a Small-Scale Dynamo Simulation

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    K., et al

    Przybylski, D., Cameron, R., Solanki, S. K., et al. 2022, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 664, A91 Quintero Noda, C., Schlichenmaier, R., Bellot Rubio, L. R., et al. 2022, Astron- omy & Astrophysics, 666, A21

    work page 2022

  50. [50]

    2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 834, 10

    Rempel, M. 2017, The Astrophysical Journal, 834, 10

    work page 2017

  51. [51]

    Robinson, R. A. & Carlsson, M. 2023, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 677, A36

    work page 2023

  52. [52]

    A., Carlsson, M., & Aulanier, G

    Robinson, R. A., Carlsson, M., & Aulanier, G. 2022, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 668, A177

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Rutten, R. J. 2003, Radiative Transfer in Stellar Atmospheres

    work page 2003

  54. [54]

    1979, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 74, 273

    Schmieder, B. 1979, Astronomy and Astrophysics, 74, 273

    work page 1979

  55. [55]

    J., Title, A

    Schrijver, C. J., Title, A. M., Van Ballegooijen, A. A., Hagenaar, H. J., & Shine, R. A. 1997, The Astrophysical Journal, 487, 424

    work page 1997

  56. [56]

    1906, Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wis- senschaften zu Göttingen

    Schwarzschild, K. 1906, Nachrichten von der Königlichen Gesellschaft der Wis- senschaften zu Göttingen. Math.-phys. Klasse, 195, 41

    work page 1906

  57. [57]

    1948, The Astrophysical Journal, 107, 1

    Schwarzschild, M. 1948, The Astrophysical Journal, 107, 1

    work page 1948

  58. [58]

    D., & Przybylski, D

    Shelyag, S., Khomenko, E., Vicente, A. D., & Przybylski, D. 2016, The Astro- physical Journal Letters, 819, L11

    work page 2016

  59. [59]

    K., Hirzberger, J., Riethmüller, T

    Sinjan, J., Solanki, S. K., Hirzberger, J., Riethmüller, T. L., & Przybylski, D. 2024, Magnetograms Underestimate Even Unipolar Magnetic Flux Nearly Everywhere on the Solar Disk

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    J., Fedun, V ., Goossens, M., Silva, S

    Skirvin, S. J., Fedun, V ., Goossens, M., Silva, S. S. A., & Verth, G. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal, 975, 176 Sow Mondal, S., Klimchuk, J. A., & Sarkar, A. 2022, The Astrophysical Journal, 937, 71

    work page 2024

  61. [61]

    Stangalini, M., Del Moro, D., Berrilli, F., & Jefferies, S. M. 2011, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 534, A65

    work page 2011

  62. [62]

    2025, The Dynamics of Small-Scale Magnetic Fields Modulated by the Solar Cycle

    Stangalini, M., Verth, G., Fedun, V ., et al. 2025, The Dynamics of Small-Scale Magnetic Fields Modulated by the Solar Cycle

    work page 2025

  63. [63]

    Sullivan, C. B. & Kaszynski, A. 2019, Journal of Open Source Software, 4, 1450

    work page 2019

  64. [64]

    A., Kee, N

    Tarr, L. A., Kee, N. D., Linton, M. G., Schuck, P. W., & Leake, J. E. 2024, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 270, 30 Udnæs, E. R. & Pereira, T. M. D. 2025, Characteristics of Acoustic-Wave Heat- ing in Simulations of the Quiet Sun Chromosphere Van Der Holst, B., Sokolov, I. V ., Meng, X., et al. 2014, The Astrophysical Jour- nal, 782, 81

    work page 2024

  65. [65]

    2026, MHD Modelling of Open Flux Evo- lution around Solar Maximum by Coronal Model COCONUT

    Wang, H., Poedts, S., Lani, A., et al. 2026, MHD Modelling of Open Flux Evo- lution around Solar Maximum by Coronal Model COCONUT

    work page 2026

  66. [66]

    R., & Nash, A

    Wang, Y .-M., Sheeley, N. R., & Nash, A. G. 1990, Nature, 347, 439

    work page 1990

  67. [67]

    2025, Millimeter-Wavelength Obser- vations of the Active Sun: Unveiling the Origins of Space Weather

    Wedemeyer, S., Poedts, S., Gunár, S., et al. 2025, Millimeter-Wavelength Obser- vations of the Active Sun: Unveiling the Origins of Space Weather

    work page 2025

  68. [68]

    Withbroe, G. L. & Noyes, R. W. 1977, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astro- physics, 15, 363

    work page 1977

  69. [69]

    & Shibata, K

    Yokoyama, T. & Shibata, K. 1995, 375

    work page 1995

  70. [70]

    1987, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 83 Article number, page 13 of 13

    Zwaan, C. 1987, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 25, 83 Article number, page 13 of 13

    work page 1987