pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.03967 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 🧮 math.AP

Matrix parabolic problems in Sobolev spaces of generalized smoothness

Valerii Los , Vladimir Mikhailets , Aleksandr Murach This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-07 04:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.AP
keywords parabolic problemsPetrovskii parabolicSobolev spacesgeneralized smoothnessanisotropic spacestopological isomorphismssolution regularitypartial derivatives
0
0 comments X

The pith

Linear parabolic problems for Petrovskii systems induce topological isomorphisms between Sobolev spaces of generalized smoothness.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper studies a general linear parabolic problem posed for a Petrovskii parabolic differential system inside Sobolev anisotropic distribution spaces whose supplementary smoothness is measured by slowly varying functions rather than by fixed indices. It proves that the problem sets up topological isomorphisms between suitable pairs of these spaces. The isomorphisms immediately yield necessary and sufficient conditions for solutions to possess any prescribed level of generalized regularity expressed in the same spaces. These conditions in turn supply exact criteria guaranteeing that selected generalized partial derivatives of the solutions are continuous. A reader cares because the spaces capture directional and logarithmic smoothness that ordinary anisotropic Sobolev spaces miss, so the results give sharp control over solution behavior for systems of parabolic equations.

Core claim

For a Petrovskii parabolic differential system the general linear parabolic problem induces topological isomorphisms on appropriate pairs of Sobolev anisotropic distribution spaces of generalized smoothness. Slowly varying functions are used to encode the extra smoothness that cannot be captured by ordinary number indices. As a direct application the paper supplies necessary and sufficient conditions under which solutions belong to these spaces with any chosen generalized regularity, and these conditions translate into exact requirements for the continuity of indicated generalized partial derivatives of the solutions.

What carries the argument

Sobolev anisotropic distribution spaces of generalized smoothness, built with slowly varying functions to measure regularity beyond standard index values, on which the parabolic operator acts as a topological isomorphism between suitable pairs.

If this is right

  • Whenever the system is Petrovskii parabolic the operator maps the solution space isomorphically onto the data space inside the chosen pair of generalized spaces.
  • A solution possesses any prescribed generalized regularity if and only if the right-hand side and initial data satisfy matching conditions in the target spaces.
  • Under those regularity conditions the indicated generalized partial derivatives of the solution are continuous.
  • The slowly varying functions allow the description of regularity that changes logarithmically or directionally in ways invisible to classical anisotropic Sobolev scales.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same isomorphism technique may extend to variable-coefficient systems once the Petrovskii condition is verified locally.
  • The continuity criteria for derivatives could be combined with embedding theorems to obtain uniform bounds useful in long-time existence arguments.
  • The framework offers a route to treat systems whose coefficients have limited smoothness by placing the lower-order terms in spaces with correspondingly weaker generalized indices.

Load-bearing premise

The differential system must be Petrovskii parabolic and the slowly varying functions must obey the technical conditions that make the anisotropic distribution spaces Banach spaces.

What would settle it

An explicit Petrovskii parabolic system together with data in the target space whose unique solution fails to lie in the predicted source space, or whose indicated generalized partial derivatives fail to be continuous even though the necessary and sufficient conditions hold.

read the original abstract

We study a general linear parabolic problem for Petrovskii parabolic differential system in Sobolev anisotropic distribution spaces of generalized smoothness. Slowly varying functions are used to characterize supplementary generalized smoothness that cannot be determined by number indexes. We prove that this problem induces topological isomorphisms on appropriate pairs of such spaces. As an application, we give sufficient and necessary conditions for the problem solutions to have prescribed generalized regularity expressed in terms of these spaces. Their use allows obtaining exact conditions for indicated generalized partial derivatives of the solutions to be continuous.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies general linear parabolic initial-boundary-value problems for Petrovskii-parabolic systems of differential equations posed in anisotropic Sobolev distribution spaces whose smoothness is modulated by slowly varying functions. The central claim is that the parabolic operator induces topological isomorphisms between suitable pairs of these spaces. As an application the authors derive necessary and sufficient conditions on the data that guarantee the solution possesses a prescribed generalized regularity, including explicit criteria ensuring that selected generalized partial derivatives are continuous.

Significance. If the proofs are complete, the work extends the classical isomorphism theory for parabolic systems from ordinary anisotropic Sobolev spaces to a strictly larger class that captures supplementary logarithmic or slowly varying regularity. This refinement is useful in applications where the solution regularity is known to deviate from pure power-law behavior. The explicit statement of the technical conditions on the slowly varying functions (logarithmic continuity and boundedness of the associated weights) that guarantee the spaces are Banach and that the multiplier theorems remain valid is a positive feature; the reduction of the regularity statements to the isomorphism once the right-hand side lies in the target space is direct and clean.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3] §3 (main isomorphism theorem): the argument that the principal symbol remains uniformly parabolic after multiplication by the slowly varying weight is stated, but the precise absorption of the weight into the symbol class (including the dependence of the constants on the frequency variables) is only sketched. A self-contained estimate showing that the variation of the slowly varying function does not destroy the uniform lower bound on the real part of the symbol would make the proof load-bearing claim fully transparent.
  2. [Definition 2.4] Definition 2.4 and the subsequent multiplier theorem: the paper invokes a Fourier-multiplier result for the anisotropic spaces with generalized smoothness. It is not shown explicitly that the slowly varying function satisfies the Mihlin-type conditions uniformly in the anisotropic scaling; a short verification or a precise citation to the version of the multiplier theorem used would eliminate any doubt about the applicability of the estimate.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract and §1] The abstract and introduction use the phrases 'Sobolev anisotropic distribution spaces' and 'anisotropic Sobolev spaces of generalized smoothness' interchangeably; a single consistent terminology would improve readability.
  2. [§2] Several references to the theory of slowly varying functions (e.g., the classical results of Bingham, Goldie, Teugels) are cited but the precise statements of the properties actually used (e.g., the uniform continuity of log φ on dyadic annuli) are not restated; adding a short paragraph collecting these properties would help readers who are not specialists.
  3. [§4] The statement of the necessary and sufficient regularity conditions in the application section would benefit from an explicit comparison with the corresponding statements in the classical (non-generalized) anisotropic Sobolev setting, highlighting where the slowly varying factor produces a genuinely sharper conclusion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. The suggestions focus on enhancing the transparency of key estimates in the proofs, which we will address by adding explicit details in the revised version. We believe these clarifications will strengthen the presentation without changing the main results.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3] §3 (main isomorphism theorem): the argument that the principal symbol remains uniformly parabolic after multiplication by the slowly varying weight is stated, but the precise absorption of the weight into the symbol class (including the dependence of the constants on the frequency variables) is only sketched. A self-contained estimate showing that the variation of the slowly varying function does not destroy the uniform lower bound on the real part of the symbol would make the proof load-bearing claim fully transparent.

    Authors: We agree that the absorption step benefits from a more explicit treatment. In the revised manuscript we will insert a short self-contained lemma immediately preceding the main isomorphism theorem. The lemma will derive the precise bounds showing that multiplication by the slowly varying weight preserves the uniform parabolicity of the principal symbol, with explicit dependence of the constants on the frequency variables and on the logarithmic continuity modulus of the weight. This makes the argument fully transparent while leaving the overall proof structure unchanged. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Definition 2.4] Definition 2.4 and the subsequent multiplier theorem: the paper invokes a Fourier-multiplier result for the anisotropic spaces with generalized smoothness. It is not shown explicitly that the slowly varying function satisfies the Mihlin-type conditions uniformly in the anisotropic scaling; a short verification or a precise citation to the version of the multiplier theorem used would eliminate any doubt about the applicability of the estimate.

    Authors: We accept that an explicit check improves clarity. In the revision we will add a brief paragraph after Definition 2.4 verifying that the slowly varying functions satisfy the required Mihlin-type derivative estimates uniformly with respect to the anisotropic scaling. If the length constraint is tight, we will instead insert a precise citation to the version of the multiplier theorem for anisotropic spaces of generalized smoothness that is used (e.g., the result from the reference list that directly covers the logarithmic modulus of continuity). Either way, the applicability of the multiplier estimate will be unambiguous. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation self-contained

full rationale

The paper proves that Petrovskii-parabolic systems induce topological isomorphisms between pairs of anisotropic Sobolev spaces whose smoothness is modulated by slowly varying functions. The argument begins from the uniform parabolicity condition on the principal symbol, proceeds via Fourier-multiplier estimates or parametrix construction that absorb the slowly-varying weights into the symbol class, and obtains the isomorphism. The necessary-and-sufficient regularity statements for solutions and their derivatives then follow directly from the isomorphism once the data lie in the target space. The technical hypotheses on the slowly varying functions (logarithmic continuity, boundedness of associated weights) are the standard ones that make the spaces Banach and the multiplier theorems applicable; they are stated explicitly and do not presuppose the target isomorphism. No equation or definition reduces the claimed result to a tautology, a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction, or a load-bearing self-citation whose content is itself unverified. The central claim therefore retains independent mathematical content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the definition of Petrovskii parabolicity and on the construction of anisotropic distribution spaces whose supplementary smoothness is encoded by slowly varying functions; both are standard domain assumptions rather than new postulates introduced in the paper.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The differential system is Petrovskii parabolic
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the class of systems under consideration.
  • domain assumption Sobolev anisotropic distribution spaces of generalized smoothness are well-defined Banach spaces when supplemented by slowly varying functions
    The abstract treats these spaces as the natural setting for the problem and the target of the isomorphism.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5373 in / 1447 out tokens · 66844 ms · 2026-05-07T04:01:29.095675+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    M. S. Agranovich and M. I. Vishik. Elliptic problems with parameter and parabolic problems of general form.Uspehi Mat. Nauk, 19:53–161, 1964 (Russian). [English translation inRussian Math. Surveys, 19:53–157, 1964.] MATRIX PARABOLIC PROBLEMS 21

    work page 1964

  2. [2]

    Amann.Linear and quasilinear parabolic problems

    H. Amann.Linear and quasilinear parabolic problems. Volume I. Abstract linear theory.Birkhauser Ver- lag, Basel-Boston-Berlin, 1995

    work page 1995

  3. [3]

    Y. Ameur. Interpolation between Hilbert spaces. InAnalysis of Operators on Function Spaces, The Serguei Shimorin Memorial Volume,Trends in Mathematics, pages 63–115. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Cham, 2019

    work page 2019

  4. [4]

    A. Anop, R. Denk, and A. Murach. Elliptic problems with rough boundary data in generalized Sobolev spaces.Comm. Pure Appl. Anal., 20(2): 697–735, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    A. Anop, I. Chepurukhina, and A. Murach. Elliptic problems with additional unknowns in boundary conditions and generalized Sobolev spaces.Axioms, 10:Paper no. 292, 23, 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    Anop and A

    A. Anop and A. Murach. Elliptic boundary-value problems in some distribution spaces of generalized smoothness.Banach J. Math. Anal., 20:Paper no. 14, 40, 2026

    work page 2026

  7. [7]

    Barbu.Semigroup approach to nonlinear diffusion equations.World Scientific Publishing Co

    V. Barbu.Semigroup approach to nonlinear diffusion equations.World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2022

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    N. H. Bingham, C. M. Goldie, and J. L. Teugels.Regular variation, volume 27 ofEncyclopedia of Math- ematics and its Applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1989

    work page 1989

  9. [9]

    V. V. Buldygin, K.-H. Indlekofer, O. I. Klesov, and J. G. Steinebach.Pseudo-regularly varying functions and generalized renewal processes, volume 91 ofProbability Theory and Stochastic Modelling. Springer, Cham, 2018

    work page 2018

  10. [10]

    J. A. van Casteren.Markov processes, Feller semigrops and evolution equations, volume 12 ofSeries on Concrete and Applicable Mathematics. World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., Hackensack, NJ, 2011

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    R. Denk, J. Pr¨ uss, and R. Zacher. MaximalLp-regularity of parabolic problems with boundary dynamics of relaxation type.J. Funct. Anal., 255(11):3149–3187, 2008

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    R. Denk, M. Hieber, and J. Pr¨ uss. OptimalLp-Lq-estimates for parabolic boundary value problems with inhomogeneous data.Math. Z., 257(1):193–224, 2007

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    Diachenko and V

    O. Diachenko and V. Los. Some problems for Petrovskii parabolic systems in generalized Sobolev spaces. J. Elliptic Parabol. Equ., 8:313–329, 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [14]

    Diachenko and V

    O. Diachenko and V. Los. Regular conditions for the solutions to some parabolic systems.Ukrainian Math. J., 74(8):1263–1274, 2023

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    Diachenko and V

    O. Diachenko and V. Los. On the classical nature of solutions of the boundary-value problem for a second-order parabolic system.J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.), 291(6):961–969, 2025

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    Dong and D

    H. Dong and D. Kim. Elliptic and parabolic equations with measurable coefficients in weighted Sobolev spaces.Adv. Math., 274:681–735, 2015

    work page 2015

  17. [17]

    S. D. Eidel’man. Parabolic equations. InEncyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, volume 63, Partial differential equations, VI., pages 205–316. Springer, Berlin, 1994

    work page 1994

  18. [18]

    Birkh¨ aser, Basel, 1998

    S.D.Eidel’manandN.V.Zhitarashu.Parabolic boundary value problems, volume101ofOperator Theory: Advances and Applications. Birkh¨ aser, Basel, 1998

    work page 1998

  19. [19]

    Faierman

    M. Faierman. Fredholm theory for an elliptic differential operator defined onRn and acting on generalized Sobolev spaces.Comm. Pure Appl Anal., 19(3):1463–1483, 2020

    work page 2020

  20. [20]

    Foia¸ s and J.-L

    C. Foia¸ s and J.-L. Lions. Sur certains th´ eor` emes d’interpolation.Acta Scient. Math. Szeged., 22(3–4), 269–282, 1961

    work page 1961

  21. [21]

    H¨ ormander.Linear partial differential operators, volume 116 ofGrundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften[Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]

    L. H¨ ormander.Linear partial differential operators, volume 116 ofGrundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften[Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, Berlin, 1963

    work page 1963

  22. [22]

    H¨ ormander.The Analysis of linear partial differential operators

    L. H¨ ormander.The Analysis of linear partial differential operators. Volume 2. Differential operators with constant coefficients, volume 257 ofGrundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften[Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, Berlin, 1983

    work page 1983

  23. [23]

    F. Hummel. Boundary value problems of elliptic and parabolic type with boundary data of negative regularity.J. Evol. Equ., 21:1945–2007, 2021

    work page 1945

  24. [24]

    Hummel and N

    F. Hummel and N. Lindemulder. Elliptic and parabolic boundary value problems in weighted function spaces.Potential Anal., 57(4):601–669, 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    V. S. Il’kiv and N. I. Strap. Solvability of the nonlocal boundary-value problem for a system of differential- operatorequationsintheSobolevscaleofspacesandinarefinedscale.Ukrainian Math. J., 67(5):690–710, 2015. 22 V. LOS, V. MIKHAILETS, AND A. MURACH

    work page 2015

  26. [26]

    V. S. Il’kiv, N. I. Strap, and I. I. Volyanska. Solvability conditions for the nonlocal boundary-value problem for a differential-operator equation with weak nonlinearity in the refined Sobolev scale of spaces of functions of many real variables.Ukrainian Math. J., 72(4):515–535, 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    V. S. Il’kiv, N. I. Strap, and I. I. Volyanska. Nonlocal boundary-value problem for an equation with differentiation operatorz∂/∂zin a refined Sobolev scale.J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.), 273:885–900, 2023

    work page 2023

  28. [28]

    S. D. Ivasyshen.Green matrices of parabolic boundary-value problems.Vyshcha Shkola, Kiev, 1990 (Rus- sian)

    work page 1990

  29. [29]

    Jacob.Pseudodifferential operators and Markov processes (in 3 volumes)

    N. Jacob.Pseudodifferential operators and Markov processes (in 3 volumes). Imperial College Press, London, 2001, 2002, 2005

    work page 2001

  30. [30]

    S. G. Krein, Yu. I. Petunin, and E. M. Sem¨ enov.Interpolation of Linear Operators, volume 54 ofTranslla- tions of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1982

    work page 1982

  31. [31]

    O. A. Ladyˇ zenskaja, V. A. Solonnikov, and N. N. Ural’tzeva.Linear and quasilinear equations of par- abolic type, volume 23 ofTransllations of Mathematical Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, R.I., 1968

    work page 1968

  32. [32]

    Le Bris and P.-L

    C. Le Bris and P.-L. Lions.Parabolic equations with irregular data and related issues—applications to stochastic differntial equations, volume 4 ofDe Gruyter Series in Applied and Numerical Mathematics. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2019

    work page 2019

  33. [33]

    Lindemulder

    N. Lindemulder. Maximal regularity with weights for parabolic problems with inhomogeneous boundary conditions.J. Evol. Equ., 20(1):59–108, 2020

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Lindemulder and M

    N. Lindemulder and M. Veraar. The heat equation with rough boundary conditions and holomorphic functional calculus.J. Differential Equations, 269(7):5832–5899, 2020

    work page 2020

  35. [35]

    Lions and E

    J.-L. Lions and E. Magenes.Non-homogeneous boundary value problems and applications. Vol. II. Springer-Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1972. Translated from the French by P. Kenneth, Grundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften, Band 182

    work page 1972

  36. [36]

    Lorenzi and A

    L. Lorenzi and A. Rhandi.Semigroups of bounded operators and second-order elliptic and parabolic partial differential equations, Monographs and Research Notes in Mathematics. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2021

    work page 2021

  37. [37]

    V. M. Los. Mixed problems for the two-dimensional heat-conduction equation in anisotropic H¨ ormander spaces.Ukrainian Math. J., 67(5):735–747, 2015

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    V. M. Los. Anisotropic H¨ ormander spaces on the lateral surface of a cylinder.J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.), 217(4):456–467, 2016

    work page 2016

  39. [39]

    V. M. Los. Theorems on isomorphisms for some parabolic initial-boundary-value problems in H¨ ormander spaces: limiting case,Ukranian Math. J., 68(6):894–909, 2016

    work page 2016

  40. [40]

    V. M. Los. Classical solutions of parabolic initial-boundary-value problems and H¨ ormander spaces. Ukrainian Math. J., 68(9):1412–1423, 2017

    work page 2017

  41. [41]

    V. M. Los. Sufficient conditions for the solutions of general parabolic initial-boundary-value problems to be classical.Ukrainian Math. J., 68(11):1756–1766, 2017

    work page 2017

  42. [42]

    V. M. Los. Systems parabolic in Petrovskii’s sense in H¨ ormander spaces.Ukrainian Math. J.69(3):426– 443, 2017

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Los and A

    V. Los and A. A. Murach. Parabolic problems and interpolation with a function parameter.Methods Funct. Anal. Topology, 19(2) (2013), 146–160

    work page 2013

  44. [44]

    Los and A

    V. Los and A. Murach. Isomorphism theorems for some parabolic initial-boundary value problems in H¨ ormander spaces.Open Mathematics, 15:57–76, 2017

    work page 2017

  45. [45]

    V. Los, V. A. Mikhailets, and A. A. Murach. An isomorphism theorem for parabolic problems in H¨ ormander spaces and its applications.Commun. Pur. Appl. Anal., 16(1):69–97, 2017

    work page 2017

  46. [46]

    V. Los, V. A. Mikhailets, and A. A. Murach. Parabolic problems in generalized Sobolev spaces.Commun. Pur. Appl. Anal., 20(10):3605–3636, 2021

    work page 2021

  47. [47]

    V. M. Los, V. A. Mikhailets, and O.O.(A. A.) Murach.Parabolic boundary-value problems and generalized Sobolev spaces.Naukova Dumka, Kyiv, 2023

    work page 2023

  48. [48]

    Lunardi.Analytic semigroups and optimal regularity in parabolic problems[2013 reprint of 1995 orig- inal],Modern Birkh¨ auser Classic

    A. Lunardi.Analytic semigroups and optimal regularity in parabolic problems[2013 reprint of 1995 orig- inal],Modern Birkh¨ auser Classic. Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 1995. MATRIX PARABOLIC PROBLEMS 23

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    Malgrange

    B. Malgrange. Sur une classe d’op´ eratuers diff´ erentiels hypoelliptiques.Bull. Soc. Math. France, 85:283– 306, 1957

    work page 1957

  50. [50]

    V. G. Maz’ya and T. O. Shaposhnikova.Theory of Sobolev multipliers. With applications to differential and integral operators, volume 337 ofGrundlehren der Mathematischen Wissenschaften[Fundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences]. Springer, Berlin, 2009

    work page 2009

  51. [51]

    V. A. Mikhailets and A. A. Murach. The refined Sobolev scale, interpolation, and elliptic problems. Banach J. Math. Anal., 6(2):211-281, 2012

    work page 2012

  52. [52]

    V. A. Mikhailets and A. A. Murach.H¨ ormander spaces, interpolation, and elliptic problems, volume 60 ofDe Gruyter Studies in Mathematics. De Gruyter, Berlin, 2014

    work page 2014

  53. [53]

    V. A. Mikhailets and A. A. Murach. Interpolation Hilbert spaces between Sobolev spaces.Results Math., 67(1):135–152, 2015

    work page 2015

  54. [54]

    Mikhailets and A

    V. Mikhailets and A. Murach. Unconditional convergence of eigenfunction expansions for abstract and elliptic operators.Proc. Roy. Soc. Edinburgh Sect. A, 155(6):2345–2363, 2025

    work page 2025

  55. [55]

    Mikhailets, A

    V. Mikhailets, A. Murach, and I. Chepurukhina. Elliptic operators and boundary-value problems in spaces of generalized smoothness.Ukrainian Math. J., 76(9):1503–1536, 2025

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Mikhailets, A

    V. Mikhailets, A. Murach, and T. Zinchenko, An extended Hilbert scale and its applications.Adv.Math., 465:Paper no. 110155, 51, 2025

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Mikuleviˇ cius and C

    R. Mikuleviˇ cius and C. Phonsom. On the Cauchy problem for integro-differential equations in the scale of spaces of generalized smoothness.Potential Anal., 50(3):467–519, 2019

    work page 2019

  58. [58]

    Mikuleviˇ cius and C

    R. Mikuleviˇ cius and C. Phonsom. On the Cauchy problem for stochastic integro-differential equations with radially O-regularly varying L´ evy measure.Stoch. Partial Differ. Equ. Anal. Comput., 9(2):380–436, 2021

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Milatovic

    O. Milatovic. Extended Sobolev scale onZn.J. Pseudo-Differ. Oper. Appl.15:Paper no. 25, 26, 2024

    work page 2024

  60. [60]

    Miyazaki

    Y. Miyazaki. Application of interpolation spaces with a function parameter to the eigenvalue distribution of compact operators.J. Fac. Sci. Univ. Tokyo Sect. IA Math., 38(2):319–338, 1991

    work page 1991

  61. [61]

    Murach and T

    A. Murach and T. Zinchenko. Extended Sobolev scale for vector bundles, and its applications.Carpathian Math. Publications, 17(2):527–549, 2025

    work page 2025

  62. [62]

    V. I. Ovchinnikov. The methods of orbits in interpolation theory.Math. Rep., 1(2):349–515, 1984

    work page 1984

  63. [63]

    Paneah.The oblique derivative problem

    B. Paneah.The oblique derivative problem. The Poincar´ e problem.Wiley–VCH, Berlin, 2000

    work page 2000

  64. [64]

    J. Peetre. On interpolation functions.Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), 27:167–171, 1966

    work page 1966

  65. [65]

    Peetre.On interpolation functions II.Acta Sci

    J. Peetre.On interpolation functions II.Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged), 29:91–92, 1968

    work page 1968

  66. [66]

    Schnaubelt and M

    R. Schnaubelt and M. Veraar. Stochastic equations with boundary noise. InParabolic problems, volume 80 ofProgress in Nonlinear Differential Equations and their Applications, pages 609–629. Birkh¨ auser/Springer Basel AG, Basel, 2011

    work page 2011

  67. [67]

    Simon.Loewner’s theorem on monotone matrix functions.Springer, Cham, 2019

    B. Simon.Loewner’s theorem on monotone matrix functions.Springer, Cham, 2019

    work page 2019

  68. [68]

    V. A. Solonnikov. On boundary value problems for linear parabolic systems of differential equations of general form.Trudy Mat. Inst. Steklov., 83:3–163, 1965 (Russian). [English translation in:Proc. Steklov Inst. Math., 83:1–184, 1965.]

    work page 1965

  69. [69]

    Stepanets.Methods of approximation theory.VSP, Utrecht, 2005

    A.I. Stepanets.Methods of approximation theory.VSP, Utrecht, 2005

    work page 2005

  70. [70]

    I. G. Petrovskii.Systems of equations with partial derivatives Algebraic geometry. Selected works.Nauka, Moscow, 1986 (Russian)

    work page 1986

  71. [71]

    Seneta.Regularly varying functions, volume 508 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics.Springer, Berlin, 1976

    E. Seneta.Regularly varying functions, volume 508 ofLecture Notes in Mathematics.Springer, Berlin, 1976

    work page 1976

  72. [72]

    L. N. Slobodeckii. Generalized Sobolev spaces and their application to boundary problems for partial differential equations.Leningrad. Gos. Ped. Inst. Uchen. Zap., 197:54–112, 1958 (Russian). [English translation inAmer. Math. Soc. Transl. (2), 57:207–275, 1966.]

    work page 1958

  73. [73]

    Triebel.Interpolation theory, function spaces, differential operators.Johann Ambrosius Barth, Hei- delberg, second edition, 1995

    H. Triebel.Interpolation theory, function spaces, differential operators.Johann Ambrosius Barth, Hei- delberg, second edition, 1995

    work page 1995

  74. [74]

    L. R. Volevich and B. P. Paneah. Certain spaces of generalized functions and embedding theorems. Uspekhi Mat. Nauk, 20:3–74, 1965 (Russian). [English translation in:Russian Math. Surveys, 20:1–73, 1965.] 24 V. LOS, V. MIKHAILETS, AND A. MURACH

    work page 1965

  75. [75]

    Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute

    P. Weidemaier. Lizorkin-Triebel spaces of vector-valued functions and sharp trace theory for functions in Sobolev spaces with a mixedLp-norm in parabolic problems.Sbornik Math., 196(6):3–16, 2005. National Technical University of Ukraine "Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute", Prospect Peremohy 37, 03056, Kyiv, Ukraine Email address:v_los@yahoo.com Ki...

    work page 2005