pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.04238 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-05 · 📡 eess.SP

Near-field channel estimation via wavefront parameterization

Heedong Do , Namyoon Lee , Angel Lozano This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 18:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords near-field channel estimationwavefront parameterizationpolynomial phase estimationspherical wavefrontline-of-sightmultiantenna arrayspower series expansion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Approximating the spherical wavefront as a polynomial recasts near-field channel estimation as a multidimensional polynomial phase problem.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper shows that near-field line-of-sight channels over antenna arrays can be estimated by expanding the curved wavefront in a power series around a sphere. This converts the task into a polynomial phase estimation problem across multiple dimensions. A new estimator built for arbitrary dimensions and polynomial degrees is then used to recover the channel parameters. Readers would care because large antenna arrays in future wireless systems operate in the near field, where plane-wave models lose accuracy and efficient estimation directly affects beamforming performance and data rates.

Core claim

By expressing the curved wavefront as a polynomial via a power series expansion of a sphere, the estimation of the channel over the array can be formulated as a multidimensional polynomial phase estimation problem. The application of a newly developed polynomial phase estimator, able of handling arbitrary dimensions and polynomial degrees, yields a superior tradeoff between channel estimation accuracy and complexity.

What carries the argument

Power series expansion of the spherical wavefront into a polynomial phase function, which reformulates near-field channel estimation as multidimensional polynomial phase estimation solved by a custom estimator for any dimension and degree.

Load-bearing premise

The power series expansion of the spherical wavefront approximates true near-field propagation closely enough for estimation purposes, and the new polynomial phase estimator performs as stated for the relevant dimensions and degrees.

What would settle it

A set of channel measurements or simulations in which the polynomial-based estimates show higher error than standard near-field methods, or where the estimator fails to maintain its claimed accuracy-complexity tradeoff at higher polynomial orders.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.04238 by Angel Lozano, Heedong Do, Namyoon Lee.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Venn diagram illustrating the inclusion of sets of channels. Here, view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The MLE projects the observation on the channel manifold, denoising view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Two planar arrays and the parameters describing their relative view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Gradient descent trajectories (labeled “random”) with view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Channel estimation MSE for the various setups. In the channel model, the amplitude term view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Channel estimation MSE for the various setups. The exact channel model in (5) is used. Also shown in dashed are the asymptotes in (10). The results view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Two planar arrays and the parameters describing their relative view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Sufficiency of five parameters to describe the relative geometry of a view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between objectives (52) and (56) in an exemplary setting. view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This paper deals with the estimation of multiantenna channels in the line-of-sight conditions that are prevalent in the near field. By expressing the curved wavefront as a polynomial via a power series expansion of a sphere, the estimation of the channel over the array can be formulated as a multidimensional polynomial phase estimation problem. The application of a newly developed polynomial phase estimator, able of handling arbitrary dimensions and polynomial degrees, yields a superior tradeoff between channel estimation accuracy and complexity.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a near-field LOS channel estimation technique for multi-antenna arrays. It approximates the spherical wavefront distance via a power-series (Taylor) expansion around the array center, converting the phase term into a low-degree multivariate polynomial in the element indices. Channel estimation is then recast as a multidimensional polynomial-phase estimation problem solved by a newly introduced estimator that accommodates arbitrary array dimensions and polynomial orders, with the central claim being an improved accuracy-complexity tradeoff relative to existing methods.

Significance. If the truncation error remains negligible relative to noise across the operating regime and the new estimator attains its stated performance, the parameterization could yield a computationally attractive alternative for near-field channel acquisition in large-array or high-frequency systems. The reformulation connects classical array signal processing with polynomial-phase techniques in a manner that may generalize beyond the specific LOS case examined.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2, Eq. (7)] §3.2, Eq. (7): the power-series truncation is fixed at order 3 without an explicit remainder bound expressed in terms of array aperture, carrier wavelength, and minimum distance; the central accuracy claim therefore rests on an unverified assertion that model mismatch is dominated by noise rather than truncation.
  2. [§5.3, Fig. 4] §5.3, Fig. 4: the reported MSE curves compare the proposed estimator only against far-field and approximate near-field baselines; an additional curve using the exact spherical distance model (with the same number of parameters) is needed to isolate whether gains arise from the polynomial parameterization or from the estimator itself.
  3. [§4.2, Algorithm 1] §4.2, Algorithm 1: the complexity scaling O(D^K) for K-dimensional arrays of polynomial degree D is derived under ideal phase-unwrapping assumptions that are not stress-tested for the near-field geometry when the Fresnel number exceeds 1; the claimed complexity advantage may therefore be overstated for the largest arrays considered.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract contains the phrasing 'able of handling'; this should be corrected to 'able to handle'.
  2. [§4] Notation for the array-element indices (m,n) is introduced in §2 but reused without redefinition in the multidimensional estimator of §4; a brief reminder would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§3.2, Eq. (7)] the power-series truncation is fixed at order 3 without an explicit remainder bound expressed in terms of array aperture, carrier wavelength, and minimum distance; the central accuracy claim therefore rests on an unverified assertion that model mismatch is dominated by noise rather than truncation.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit remainder bound would provide stronger theoretical justification for the chosen truncation order. In the revised manuscript we will derive the Lagrange-form remainder for the Taylor expansion of the spherical distance and express it in terms of array aperture, carrier wavelength, and minimum distance, showing that the truncation error lies below the noise floor throughout the operating regime considered in the paper. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.3, Fig. 4] the reported MSE curves compare the proposed estimator only against far-field and approximate near-field baselines; an additional curve using the exact spherical distance model (with the same number of parameters) is needed to isolate whether gains arise from the polynomial parameterization or from the estimator itself.

    Authors: We concur that a direct comparison against the exact spherical model is necessary to isolate the benefit of the polynomial parameterization. We will add this curve to Figure 4, performing maximum-likelihood estimation under the exact distance model while keeping the number of parameters identical to that used by the polynomial estimator. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§4.2, Algorithm 1] the complexity scaling O(D^K) for K-dimensional arrays of polynomial degree D is derived under ideal phase-unwrapping assumptions that are not stress-tested for the near-field geometry when the Fresnel number exceeds 1; the claimed complexity advantage may therefore be overstated for the largest arrays considered.

    Authors: The O(D^K) scaling is obtained under the assumption of successful phase unwrapping, which holds for the SNR and geometry ranges examined in the main simulations. To address the referee’s concern we will include additional Monte-Carlo results that explicitly measure phase-unwrapping success rate and realized complexity for Fresnel numbers greater than one, thereby verifying that the claimed scaling remains valid in the regimes of interest. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper formulates near-field channel estimation by rewriting the spherical wavefront distance via power series expansion into a multivariate polynomial phase model, then applies a polynomial phase estimator. No equations in the provided text reduce the claimed superior accuracy-complexity tradeoff to a fitted parameter by construction, a self-definitional loop, or a load-bearing self-citation whose validity depends on the present work. The expansion and estimator application constitute an independent modeling choice whose performance can be externally validated against the exact spherical model or other estimators, satisfying the criteria for a non-circular derivation.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review limits visibility; the approach assumes the validity of the spherical power series expansion and the existence/performance of the new estimator without detailing free parameters or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The spherical wavefront can be accurately approximated by a low-order power series expansion for channel estimation purposes.
    Invoked in the abstract to convert the curved wavefront into a polynomial phase problem.
invented entities (1)
  • Newly developed polynomial phase estimator for arbitrary dimensions and degrees no independent evidence
    purpose: To solve the multidimensional polynomial phase estimation problem arising from wavefront parameterization
    Introduced in the abstract as the key tool delivering the superior tradeoff; no independent evidence provided.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5359 in / 1229 out tokens · 50341 ms · 2026-05-08T18:04:49.404598+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Estimation of near-field line-of-sight channels: a multidimensional polynomial phase approach,

    H. Do, N. Lee, and A. Lozano, “Estimation of near-field line-of-sight channels: a multidimensional polynomial phase approach,” inAsilomar Conf. Signals Syst. Comput., 2024, pp. 152–157

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Terahertz line-of-sight MIMO communication: Theory and practical challenges,

    H. Do, S. Cho, J. Park, H.-J. Song, N. Lee, and A. Lozano, “Terahertz line-of-sight MIMO communication: Theory and practical challenges,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 59, no. 3, pp. 104–109, 2021

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    6G wireless communications: From far-field beam steering to near-field beam focusing,

    H. Zhang, N. Shlezinger, F. Guidi, D. Dardari, and Y . C. Eldar, “6G wireless communications: From far-field beam steering to near-field beam focusing,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 72–77, 2023

    work page 2023

  4. [4]

    Exploiting the depth and angular domains for massive near-field spatial multiplexing,

    P. Ramezani, A. Kosasih, A. Irshad, and E. Bj ¨ornson, “Exploiting the depth and angular domains for massive near-field spatial multiplexing,” IEEE BITS Inform. Theory Mag., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 14–26, 2023

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    Wide-aperture MIMO via reflection off a smooth surface,

    A. Pizzo, A. Lozano, S. Rangan, and T. L. Marzetta, “Wide-aperture MIMO via reflection off a smooth surface,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 8, pp. 5229–5239, 2023

    work page 2023

  6. [6]

    On the capacity formula for multiple input-multiple output wireless channels: A geometric interpretation,

    P. F. Driessen and G. Foschini, “On the capacity formula for multiple input-multiple output wireless channels: A geometric interpretation,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 47, no. 2, pp. 173–176, 1999

    work page 1999

  7. [7]

    Spherical-wave model for short-range MIMO,

    J.-S. Jiang and M. A. Ingram, “Spherical-wave model for short-range MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 53, no. 9, pp. 1534–1541, 2005

    work page 2005

  8. [8]

    Construction and capacity analysis of high-rank line-of-sight MIMO channels,

    F. Bøhagen, P. Orten, and G. Øien, “Construction and capacity analysis of high-rank line-of-sight MIMO channels,” inIEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf., 2005, pp. 432–437

    work page 2005

  9. [9]

    Design and performance assessment of high-capacity MIMO architectures in the presence of a line-of-sight component,

    I. Sarris and A. R. Nix, “Design and performance assessment of high-capacity MIMO architectures in the presence of a line-of-sight component,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 2194–2202, 2007

    work page 2007

  10. [10]

    Design of optimal high-rank line- of-sight MIMO channels,

    F. Bøhagen, P. Orten, and G. Øien, “Design of optimal high-rank line- of-sight MIMO channels,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 1420–1425, 2007

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    Optimal design of uniform rectangular antenna arrays for strong line-of-sight MIMO channels,

    ——, “Optimal design of uniform rectangular antenna arrays for strong line-of-sight MIMO channels,”EURASIP J. Wireless Commun. Netw., vol. 2007, pp. 1–10, 2007

    work page 2007

  12. [12]

    On spherical vs. plane wave modeling of line-of-sight MIMO channels,

    ——, “On spherical vs. plane wave modeling of line-of-sight MIMO channels,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 841–849, 2009

    work page 2009

  13. [13]

    Indoor millimeter wave MIMO: Feasibility and performance,

    E. Torkildson, U. Madhow, and M. Rodwell, “Indoor millimeter wave MIMO: Feasibility and performance,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 10, no. 12, pp. 4150–4160, 2011

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    On spatial multiplexing of strong line-of- sight MIMO with 3D antenna arrangements,

    X. Song and G. Fettweis, “On spatial multiplexing of strong line-of- sight MIMO with 3D antenna arrangements,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 393–396, Apr. 2015

    work page 2015

  15. [15]

    Capacity of line-of-sight MIMO channels,

    H. Do, N. Lee, and A. Lozano, “Capacity of line-of-sight MIMO channels,” inIEEE Int’l Symp. Inform. Theory, 2020, pp. 2044–2048

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    Reconfigurable ULAs for line-of-sight MIMO transmission,

    ——, “Reconfigurable ULAs for line-of-sight MIMO transmission,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2933–2947, 2021

    work page 2021

  17. [17]

    On Landau’s eigenvalue theorem for line-of- sight MIMO channels,

    A. Pizzo and A. Lozano, “On Landau’s eigenvalue theorem for line-of- sight MIMO channels,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., vol. 11, no. 12, pp. 2565–2569, 2022

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Degrees of freedom in 3D linear large-scale antenna array communications—a spatial bandwidth approach,

    L. Ding, E. G. Str ¨om, and J. Zhang, “Degrees of freedom in 3D linear large-scale antenna array communications—a spatial bandwidth approach,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2805–2822, 2022

    work page 2022

  19. [19]

    Line-of-sight MIMO via intelligent reflecting surface,

    H. Do, N. Lee, and A. Lozano, “Line-of-sight MIMO via intelligent reflecting surface,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 6, pp. 4215–4231, 2023

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    Near-field sparse channel representation and estimation in 6G wireless communications,

    X. Zhang, H. Zhang, and Y . C. Eldar, “Near-field sparse channel representation and estimation in 6G wireless communications,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 450–464, 2023

    work page 2023

  21. [21]

    Near-field communications: A comprehensive survey,

    Y . Liu, C. Ouyang, Z. Wang, J. Xu, X. Mu, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Near-field communications: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Commun. Surv. & Tut., vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1687–1728, 2024

    work page 2024

  22. [22]

    Near-field channel estimation and localization: Recent developments, cooperative integration, and future directions,

    S. Yang, H. Chen, W. Liu, X.-P. Zhang, and C. Yuen, “Near-field channel estimation and localization: Recent developments, cooperative integration, and future directions,”IEEE Signal Process. Mag., vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 60–73, 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Training-based channel estimation for continuous flat fading BLAST,

    Q. Sun, D. Cox, A. Lozano, and H. C. Huang, “Training-based channel estimation for continuous flat fading BLAST,” inIEEE Int’l Conf. Commun., 2002, pp. 325–329

    work page 2002

  24. [24]

    Massive MIMO channel estimation taking into account spherical waves,

    L. Le Magoarou, A. Le Calvez, and S. Paquelet, “Massive MIMO channel estimation taking into account spherical waves,” inIEEE Int’l Workshop Signal Process. Advances Wireless Commun., 2019, pp. 1–5

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    Adaptive joint sparse Bayesian approaches for near-field channel estimation,

    Z. Zhu, R. Yang, C. Li, Y . Huang, and L. Yang, “Adaptive joint sparse Bayesian approaches for near-field channel estimation,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2590–2605, 2025

    work page 2025

  26. [26]

    A one-snapshot lo- calization algorithm for mixed far-field and near-field sources,

    Z. Huang, W. Wang, F. Dong, and D. Wang, “A one-snapshot lo- calization algorithm for mixed far-field and near-field sources,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1010–1014, 2020

    work page 2020

  27. [27]

    Channel estimation for extremely large-scale MIMO: Far-field or near-field?

    M. Cui and L. Dai, “Channel estimation for extremely large-scale MIMO: Far-field or near-field?”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 2663–2677, 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [28]

    Near-field sparse channel representation and estimation in 6G wireless communications,

    X. Zhang, H. Zhang, and Y . C. Eldar, “Near-field sparse channel representation and estimation in 6G wireless communications,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 450–464, 2024

    work page 2024

  29. [29]

    Near-field channel esti- mation for ultra-massive MIMO antenna array with hybrid architecture,

    A. Hussain, A. Abdallah, and A. M. Eltawil, “Near-field channel esti- mation for ultra-massive MIMO antenna array with hybrid architecture,” inIEEE Wireless Commun. Netw. Conf., 2024

    work page 2024

  30. [30]

    Multipath parameters estimation of near-field spatial-wideband systems,

    S. Das, D. Sen, and E. Viterbo, “Multipath parameters estimation of near-field spatial-wideband systems,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 28, no. 7, pp. 1649–1653, 2024

    work page 2024

  31. [31]

    MBPD: A robust algorithm for polar-domain channel estimation in near-field wideband XL-MIMO systems,

    H. Wang, P. Guo, X. Li, F. Wen, X. Wang, and A. Nallanathan, “MBPD: A robust algorithm for polar-domain channel estimation in near-field wideband XL-MIMO systems,”IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 12, no. 12, pp. 18 461–18 470, 2025

    work page 2025

  32. [32]

    Near field dictionary design and channel estimation using discrete Fresnel transform,

    Z. Xu, S. Wang, and Y .-J. A. Zhang, “Near field dictionary design and channel estimation using discrete Fresnel transform,” inAsilomar Conf. Signals Syst. Comput., 2024, pp. 1690–1694

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Ringwise codebook for precoding in unified near and far-field communication,

    H. Wu, L. Lu, Y . Wang, Z. Wang, and Z. Han, “Ringwise codebook for precoding in unified near and far-field communication,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 13 698–13 712, 2026

    work page 2026

  34. [34]

    Efficient near- field channel feature estimation: Criteria and algorithms,

    H. Chung, H. Kim, S. Kim, A. Conti, and M. Z. Win, “Efficient near- field channel feature estimation: Criteria and algorithms,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Inform. Theory, 2025

    work page 2025

  35. [35]

    Parametric near-field channel estimation for extremely large aperture arrays,

    A. Kosasih, ¨O. T. Demir, and E. Bj ¨ornson, “Parametric near-field channel estimation for extremely large aperture arrays,” inAsilomar Conf. Signals Syst. Comput., 2023, pp. 162–166

    work page 2023

  36. [36]

    Near-field localization and channel reconstruction for ELAA systems,

    Z. Lu, Y . Han, S. Jin, and M. Matthaiou, “Near-field localization and channel reconstruction for ELAA systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 6938–6953, 2024

    work page 2024

  37. [37]

    Hybrid near-and far-field THz UM-MIMO channel estimation: A sparsifying matrix learning-aided Bayesian approach,

    Y . Li and A. S. Madhukumar, “Hybrid near-and far-field THz UM-MIMO channel estimation: A sparsifying matrix learning-aided Bayesian approach,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 1881–1897, 2024

    work page 2024

  38. [38]

    Scalable near- field localization based on partitioned large-scale antenna array,

    X. Yuan, M. Zhang, Y . Zheng, B. Teng, and W. Jiang, “Scalable near- field localization based on partitioned large-scale antenna array,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 2203–2217, 2025

    work page 2025

  39. [39]

    Parametric channel estimation for LoS dominated holographic massive MIMO systems,

    M. Ghermezcheshmeh and N. Zlatanov, “Parametric channel estimation for LoS dominated holographic massive MIMO systems,”IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 44 711–44 724, 2023

    work page 2023

  40. [40]

    Near-field channel estimation for uniform planar arrays based on an end-to-end spherical wavefront channel model,

    C. Chen, J. Sun, X. Jiang, S. Yao, W. Zhang, and C.-X. Wang, “Near-field channel estimation for uniform planar arrays based on an end-to-end spherical wavefront channel model,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 7065–7082, 2026. 13

    work page 2026

  41. [41]

    Near-field channel estimation in mixed LoS/NLoS environments for extremely large-scale MIMO systems,

    Y . Lu and L. Dai, “Near-field channel estimation in mixed LoS/NLoS environments for extremely large-scale MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 71, no. 6, pp. 3694–3707, 2023

    work page 2023

  42. [42]

    Channel estimation for near-field line-of-sight XL-MIMO communications using geometric prior,

    Y . Guo, X. Guo, and Y . Wang, “Channel estimation for near-field line-of-sight XL-MIMO communications using geometric prior,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 779–783, 2025

    work page 2025

  43. [43]

    Line-of-sight MIMO systems: Near-field boundaries and channel es- timation,

    R. Song, H. Yuan, Z. Zhang, X. Gao, M. Shi, Y . Liu, and K. Yang, “Line-of-sight MIMO systems: Near-field boundaries and channel es- timation,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 12 070–12 086, 2025

    work page 2025

  44. [44]

    Double-sided near-field XL-MIMO: Beamfocusing codeword selection and channel estimation,

    X. Shi, J. Wang, X. Wang, C. You, and J. Song, “Double-sided near-field XL-MIMO: Beamfocusing codeword selection and channel estimation,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 73, no. 5, pp. 3441–3455, 2025

    work page 2025

  45. [45]

    Near-field channel estimation for extremely large-scale array communications: A model- based deep learning approach,

    X. Zhang, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, and L. Yang, “Near-field channel estimation for extremely large-scale array communications: A model- based deep learning approach,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 1155–1159, 2023

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Channel estimation for XL-MIMO systems with polar-domain multi- scale residual dense network,

    H. Lei, J. Zhang, H. Xiao, X. Zhang, B. Ai, and D. W. K. Ng, “Channel estimation for XL-MIMO systems with polar-domain multi- scale residual dense network,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1479–1484, 2024

    work page 2024

  47. [47]

    Neural network-aided near-field channel estimation for hybrid beamforming systems,

    S. Jang and C. Lee, “Neural network-aided near-field channel estimation for hybrid beamforming systems,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 72, no. 11, pp. 6768–6782, 2024

    work page 2024

  48. [48]

    Near-field channel esti- mation and sparse reconstruction for FDD XL-MIMO systems,

    Z. Wang, G. Zhang, J. Wang, and H. Xu, “Near-field channel esti- mation and sparse reconstruction for FDD XL-MIMO systems,”IEEE Commun. Lett., pp. 1–1, 2025

    work page 2025

  49. [49]

    Model-driven iterative super- resolution channel estimation for wideband near-field extremely large- scale MIMO systems,

    X. Zheng, F. Chen, C. Yang, and Y . Ai, “Model-driven iterative super- resolution channel estimation for wideband near-field extremely large- scale MIMO systems,”IEEE Wireless Commun. Lett., pp. 1–1, 2024

    work page 2024

  50. [50]

    Bayes-optimal unsupervised learning for channel estimation in near- field holographic MIMO,

    W. Yu, H. He, X. Yu, S. Song, J. Zhang, R. Murch, and K. B. Letaief, “Bayes-optimal unsupervised learning for channel estimation in near- field holographic MIMO,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 714–729, 2024

    work page 2024

  51. [51]

    Deep reinforcement learning-based near-field channel estimation for extremely large-scale MIMO systems,

    M. Tao, J. Fan, H. Xie, and J. Luo, “Deep reinforcement learning-based near-field channel estimation for extremely large-scale MIMO systems,” IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., 2026

    work page 2026

  52. [52]

    An adaptive and robust deep learning framework for THz ultra-massive MIMO channel estimation,

    W. Yu, Y . Shen, H. He, X. Yu, S. Song, J. Zhang, and K. B. Letaief, “An adaptive and robust deep learning framework for THz ultra-massive MIMO channel estimation,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 761–776, 2023

    work page 2023

  53. [53]

    Near-field channel estimation for XL-MIMO via IDiT-based variance exploding SDE generator,

    Y . Fang, S. Xu, P. Fang, J. Zhang, Y . Huang, and L. Yang, “Near-field channel estimation for XL-MIMO via IDiT-based variance exploding SDE generator,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 3559– 3574, 2026

    work page 2026

  54. [54]

    Hybrid spherical- and planar-wave modeling and DCNN-powered estimation of Terahertz ultra-massive MIMO channels,

    Y . Chen, L. Yan, and C. Han, “Hybrid spherical- and planar-wave modeling and DCNN-powered estimation of Terahertz ultra-massive MIMO channels,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 69, no. 10, pp. 7063– 7076, 2021

    work page 2021

  55. [55]

    Deep compressed sensing for terahertz ultra-massive MIMO channel estimation,

    G. Lin, M. Erdem, and M.-S. Alouini, “Deep compressed sensing for terahertz ultra-massive MIMO channel estimation,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Society, vol. 6, pp. 1747–1762, 2025

    work page 2025

  56. [56]

    Parabolic wavefront model for line-of- sight MIMO channels,

    H. Do, N. Lee, and A. Lozano, “Parabolic wavefront model for line-of- sight MIMO channels,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 11, pp. 7620–7634, 2023

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Multidimensional polynomial phase estimation,

    ——, “Multidimensional polynomial phase estimation,”IEEE Open J. Signal Process., vol. 6, pp. 651–681, 2025

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    R. L. Graham, D. E. Knuth, and O. Patashnik,Concrete mathematics: a foundation for computer science, 2nd ed. Addison Wesley, 1994

    work page 1994

  59. [59]

    R. W. Heath, Jr. and A. Lozano,Foundations of MIMO Communication. Cambridge University Press, 2018

    work page 2018

  60. [60]

    Maximum-likelihood estimation, the Cram ´er–Rao bound, and the method of scoring with parameter constraints,

    T. J. Moore, B. M. Sadler, and R. J. Kozick, “Maximum-likelihood estimation, the Cram ´er–Rao bound, and the method of scoring with parameter constraints,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 56, no. 3, pp. 895–908, 2008

    work page 2008

  61. [61]

    Do and A

    H. Do and A. Lozano, “Cramer-Rao bound for arbitrarily constrained sets,” 2026. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2601.19539

    work page arXiv 2026

  62. [62]

    Cram ´er-Rao bounds on sparse–diffuse channel estimation,

    L. Lyu, M. F. Da Costa, and U. Mitra, “Cram ´er-Rao bounds on sparse–diffuse channel estimation,” inIEEE Int’l Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Process., 2026

    work page 2026

  63. [63]

    Sinusoidal frequency estimation by gradient descent,

    B. Hayes, C. Saitis, and G. Fazekas, “Sinusoidal frequency estimation by gradient descent,” inIEEE Int’l Conf. Acoust. Speech Signal Pro- cess., 2023, pp. 1–5

    work page 2023

  64. [64]

    Chen and K

    C.-C. Chen and K. Khee-Meng,Principles and techniques in combina- torics. World Scientific, 1992

    work page 1992

  65. [65]

    C. A. Balanis,Antenna theory: analysis and design. John wiley & sons, 2016

    work page 2016

  66. [66]

    How to differentiate between near field and far field: Revisiting the Rayleigh distance,

    S. Sun, R. Li, C. Han, X. Liu, L. Xue, and M. Tao, “How to differentiate between near field and far field: Revisiting the Rayleigh distance,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 63, no. 1, pp. 22–28, 2025

    work page 2025

  67. [67]

    Polynomial phase estimation by least squares phase unwrapping,

    R. G. McKilliam, B. G. Quinn, I. V . L. Clarkson, B. Moran, and B. N. Vellambi, “Polynomial phase estimation by least squares phase unwrapping,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 62, no. 8, pp. 1962– 1975, 2014

    work page 1962

  68. [68]

    Near-field channel interpolation for pilot overhead reduction in XL-MIMO,

    H. Do, N. Lee, and A. Lozano, “Near-field channel interpolation for pilot overhead reduction in XL-MIMO,” inEuropean Signal Process. Conf., 2025

    work page 2025

  69. [69]

    Near-field spatial-domain channel extrapolation for XL-MIMO systems,

    J. Lu, J. Zhang, H. Lei, H. Xiao, B. Ai, and D. W. Kwan Ng, “Near-field spatial-domain channel extrapolation for XL-MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 25, pp. 4343–4357, 2026

    work page 2026

  70. [70]

    Localization of signals in the near-field of an antenna array,

    B. Friedlander, “Localization of signals in the near-field of an antenna array,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 67, no. 15, pp. 3885–3893, 2019

    work page 2019

  71. [71]

    Wireless channel sparsity: Measurement, analysis, and exploitation in estima- tion,

    R. He, B. Ai, G. Wang, M. Yang, C. Huang, and Z. Zhong, “Wireless channel sparsity: Measurement, analysis, and exploitation in estima- tion,”IEEE Wireless Commun., vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 113–119, 2021

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    Dunn and I

    F. Dunn and I. Parberry,3D math primer for graphics and game development. CRC Press, 2011

    work page 2011

  73. [73]

    J. M. Steele,The Cauchy-Schwarz master class: an introduction to the art of mathematical inequalities. Cambridge University Press, 2004

    work page 2004

  74. [74]

    Single tone parameter estimation from discrete-time observations,

    D. Rife and R. Boorstyn, “Single tone parameter estimation from discrete-time observations,”IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 591–598, 1974

    work page 1974

  75. [75]

    Abramowitz and I

    M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun,Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables. US Government printing office, 1948, vol. 55

    work page 1948