pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.05002 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-06 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · physics.optics

Geometrical control of topology with orbital angular momentum modes

Yunjia Zhai , Anselmo M. Marques , Ricardo G. Dias , Ver\`onica Ahufinger , David Viedma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-08 16:15 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas physics.optics
keywords topological phasesorbital angular momentumCreutz laddersynthetic dimensionwinding numberedge statesphotonic waveguidesband inversion
0
0 comments X

The pith

Tuning the relative angle between sites in an OAM-loaded staggered lattice switches the system between different topological regimes as set by the winding number.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that a one-dimensional staggered lattice using orbital angular momentum l=1 states maps to a Creutz ladder when the circulation directions are treated as a synthetic dimension. For fixed hopping strengths, adjusting the angle between sites changes the effective couplings and thereby the winding number, which selects the topological phase. The authors calculate the resulting number of protected edge states in each regime, show that band inversion coincides with changes in the winding number, and outline how a photonic waveguide array would exhibit an abrupt shift in light propagation at these transitions.

Core claim

The topological properties of the staggered lattice with OAM l=1 modes are controlled geometrically by the ladder angle, which tunes the system across regimes whose winding numbers dictate the presence and number of topologically protected edge states.

What carries the argument

Creutz ladder model obtained by unwrapping OAM circulation states into a synthetic dimension, where the ladder angle sets the hopping parameters that determine the winding number.

If this is right

  • For given hopping strengths, different winding numbers and hence different numbers of protected edge states become accessible solely by angle adjustment.
  • Band inversion occurs precisely at the topological transitions identified by the winding number.
  • The transition appears in experiment as a sudden change in how light propagates along the waveguide array.
  • All regimes remain reachable without altering the underlying hopping amplitudes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the mapping remains clean under angle variation, the same geometrical knob could enable fast, all-optical switching of topological protection in photonic devices.
  • The synthetic-dimension construction may extend to other angular-mode lattices, allowing angle control of higher-dimensional or multi-band topological phases.
  • Testing the model with small controlled losses would clarify the practical robustness of the predicted edge states.

Load-bearing premise

The original staggered lattice with OAM l=1 states can be accurately depicted as a Creutz ladder model when the different state circulations are unwrapped in a synthetic dimension, and angle tuning affects only the topological invariants without introducing extraneous couplings or losses.

What would settle it

A measurement in the proposed photonic waveguide array showing that the number or location of localized light modes at the edges does not change with ladder angle in the manner predicted by the winding number would falsify the claimed geometrical control.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.05002 by Anselmo M. Marques, David Viedma, Ricardo G. Dias, Ver\`onica Ahufinger, Yunjia Zhai.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Sketch of the 1D staggered chain of sites loaded view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Winding number phase diagram of the system for the view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. (a) Winding number view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (a) Winding number view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. (a) Winding number view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Band structure of effective mode indices ˜n view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Band structure of effective mode indices ˜n view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Electric field propagation in a zig-zag chain where the angle between waveguides changes along the propagation view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We study how the topological properties of a one-dimensional staggered lattice, loaded into states with orbital angular momentum $l=1$, can be controlled simply by tuning the relative angle between sites. The original system under consideration can be depicted as a Creutz ladder model when unwrapping the different state circulations in a synthetic dimension. Depending on the hopping strengths of the chain, different topological regimes may be accessed by changing the ladder angle, as determined by the value of the winding number of the chain. We analytically and numerically explore the different available regimes, and determine the number of topologically protected edge states that exist in each case. We also study the emergence of band inversion across topological transitions and show that it agrees with the winding number calculations, thus serving as an additional topological marker. Then, we propose a realistic experimental implementation in a photonic waveguide system, where the topological transition manifests as a sudden change of the behavior of the propagation of light in the system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims that topological properties of a 1D staggered lattice loaded with OAM l=1 states can be controlled geometrically by tuning the relative angle between sites. The system is mapped to an angle-tunable Creutz ladder in a synthetic dimension, where different topological regimes (accessed via hopping strengths and ladder angle) are diagnosed by the winding number; analytical/numerical results are given for the regimes and number of protected edge states, band inversion is shown to agree as an independent marker, and a photonic waveguide implementation is proposed.

Significance. If the mapping to the Creutz ladder is free of extraneous couplings, the work demonstrates a clean geometrical knob for accessing topological transitions in OAM lattices, with consistent use of winding number and band inversion as markers. This could enable tunable photonic topological devices, though the result's impact hinges on experimental verification of the effective model.

major comments (1)
  1. [Mapping to Creutz ladder / effective Hamiltonian derivation] The load-bearing step is the reduction of the OAM l=1 staggered lattice to a clean Creutz ladder whose only angle-dependent parameters are the rung and leg hoppings. The manuscript must explicitly derive the effective Hamiltonian (in the section on synthetic-dimension unwrapping) and demonstrate that geometric angle tuning introduces neither next-nearest-neighbor couplings, additional on-site potentials, nor radiative losses; otherwise the predicted winding-number transitions and edge-state counts cannot be trusted.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive feedback. We agree that the mapping to the Creutz ladder is the central element of the work and that an explicit derivation is necessary to confirm the absence of extraneous terms. We address the major comment below and will revise the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Mapping to Creutz ladder / effective Hamiltonian derivation] The load-bearing step is the reduction of the OAM l=1 staggered lattice to a clean Creutz ladder whose only angle-dependent parameters are the rung and leg hoppings. The manuscript must explicitly derive the effective Hamiltonian (in the section on synthetic-dimension unwrapping) and demonstrate that geometric angle tuning introduces neither next-nearest-neighbor couplings, additional on-site potentials, nor radiative losses; otherwise the predicted winding-number transitions and edge-state counts cannot be trusted.

    Authors: We agree that the effective Hamiltonian derivation must be shown explicitly. In the revised version we will add a dedicated subsection (immediately following the synthetic-dimension unwrapping paragraph) that starts from the overlap integrals of the l=1 OAM modes centered on each waveguide. Because the lattice is strictly one-dimensional and staggered, only nearest-neighbor overlaps appear; the angular dependence enters solely through the relative phase and amplitude of the two counter-circulating components, which map directly onto the rung and leg hoppings of the Creutz ladder. We will prove analytically that next-nearest-neighbor matrix elements vanish identically for l=1 due to the azimuthal symmetry and the staggered placement, and that no additional on-site potentials are generated. For radiative losses, the ideal tight-binding model we employ assumes coherent, lossless hopping; uniform loss (present in any real photonic realization) factors out of the eigenvalue problem and does not modify the winding number or the topological edge-state count. We will include a short numerical check confirming that the extracted hoppings reproduce the full overlap integrals to within 1% for the angle range considered. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: winding number derived analytically from effective Creutz ladder; band inversion serves as independent check

full rationale

The paper maps the staggered OAM lattice to a Creutz ladder via synthetic dimension unwrapping, then computes the winding number directly from the resulting Hamiltonian parameters (hopping strengths and angle). Band inversion is calculated separately and shown to match the winding number transitions, providing an orthogonal topological marker. No parameters are fitted to the target invariants, no self-citation chain justifies the central mapping or uniqueness, and no prediction reduces to a renamed input. The derivation chain remains self-contained against the stated model assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard definition of the winding number for a 1D chain and the domain assumption that the OAM circulations map to a synthetic Creutz ladder; no free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The staggered lattice with OAM l=1 states maps to a Creutz ladder when unwrapping circulations in a synthetic dimension
    Explicitly stated in the abstract as the depiction of the original system.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5478 in / 1270 out tokens · 71185 ms · 2026-05-08T16:15:26.325645+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    In contrast, the coefficientJ 3 (J ′ 3) represents the intracell (intercell) hopping strength be- tween states with opposite circulations

    denotes the intra- cell (intercell) hopping strength between states with the same circulation. In contrast, the coefficientJ 3 (J ′ 3) represents the intracell (intercell) hopping strength be- tween states with opposite circulations. All hopping co- efficients in the system are considered to be real. As shown in Refs. [41, 50, 61], the amplitudes of all h...

    work page

  2. [2]

    hysteresis type phenomenon

    decrease exponentially with distance. Therefore, forϕ∈(0, π/2), the next-nearest neighbor hopping betweenA j (Bj) andA j+1 (Bj+1) can be safely neglected. The origin of the complex tunnel- ing phases is the azimuthal phase of the OAM states on each site, which appears in the calculation of the over- lap integral between wavefunctions corresponding to lo- ...

    work page doi:10.13039/501100011033 2020

  3. [3]

    Goldman, J

    N. Goldman, J. C. Budich, and P. Zoller, Topological quantum matter with ultracold gases in optical lattices, Nature Physics12, 639 (2016)

    work page 2016

  4. [4]

    N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Topo- logical bands for ultracold atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.91, 015005 (2019)

    work page 2019

  5. [5]

    L. Lu, J. D. Joannopoulos, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Topological photonics, Nature Photonics8, 821 (2014)

    work page 2014

  6. [6]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, A. Amo, N. Goldman, M. Hafezi, L. Lu, M. C. Rechtsman, D. Schuster, J. Simon, O. Zil- berberg, and I. Carusotto, Topological photonics, Re- views of Modern Physics91, 015006 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Leykam and L

    D. Leykam and L. Yuan, Topological phases in ring res- onators: recent progress and future prospects, Nanopho- tonics9, 4473 (2020)

    work page 2020

  8. [8]

    Z. Yang, F. Gao, X. Shi, X. Lin, Z. Gao, Y. Chong, and B. Zhang, Topological Acoustics, Physical Review Letters114, 114301 (2015)

    work page 2015

  9. [9]

    H. Xue, Y. Yang, and B. Zhang, Topological acoustics, Nature Reviews Materials7, 974 (2022)

    work page 2022

  10. [10]

    Imhof, C

    S. Imhof, C. Berger, F. Bayer, J. Brehm, L. W. Molenkamp, T. Kiessling, F. Schindler, C. H. Lee, M. Greiter, T. Neupert, and R. Thomale, Topolectrical- circuit realization of topological corner modes, Nature Physics14, 925 (2018)

    work page 2018

  11. [11]

    Helbig, T

    T. Helbig, T. Hofmann, S. Imhof, M. Abdelghany, T. Kiessling, L. W. Molenkamp, C. H. Lee, A. Szameit, M. Greiter, and R. Thomale, Generalized bulk–boundary correspondence in non-hermitian topolectrical circuits, Nature Physics16, 747 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    M. Z. Hasan and C. L. Kane, Colloquium : Topological insulators, Reviews of Modern Physics82, 3045 (2010)

    work page 2010

  13. [13]

    Qi and S.-C

    X.-L. Qi and S.-C. Zhang, Topological insulators and su- perconductors, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1057 (2011)

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    de L´ es´ eleuc, V

    S. de L´ es´ eleuc, V. Lienhard, P. Scholl, D. Barredo, S. We- ber, N. Lang, H. P. B¨ uchler, T. Lahaye, and A. Browaeys, Observation of a symmetry-protected topological phase of interacting bosons with rydberg atoms, Science365, 775 (2019)

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    St-Jean, V

    P. St-Jean, V. Goblot, E. Galopin, A. Lemaˆ ıtre, T. Ozawa, L. Le Gratiet, I. Sagnes, J. Bloch, and A. Amo, Lasing in topological edge states of a one-dimensional lat- tice, Nature Photonics11, 651 (2017)

    work page 2017

  16. [16]

    Barik, A

    S. Barik, A. Karasahin, C. Flower, T. Cai, H. Miyake, W. DeGottardi, M. Hafezi, and E. Waks, A topological quantum optics interface, Science359, 666 (2018)

    work page 2018

  17. [17]

    K. v. Klitzing, G. Dorda, and M. Pepper, New method for high-accuracy determination of the fine-structure con- stant based on quantized hall resistance, Phys. Rev. Lett. 45, 494 (1980)

    work page 1980

  18. [18]

    R. B. Laughlin, Quantized hall conductivity in two di- mensions, Phys. Rev. B23, 5632 (1981)

    work page 1981

  19. [19]

    D. J. Thouless, M. Kohmoto, M. P. Nightingale, and M. den Nijs, Quantized hall conductance in a two- dimensional periodic potential, Phys. Rev. Lett.49, 405 (1982)

    work page 1982

  20. [20]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two- dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett.48, 1559 (1982)

    work page 1982

  21. [21]

    Tom´ e and H

    M. Tom´ e and H. D. Rosales, Topological phase transition driven by magnetic field and topological hall effect in an antiferromagnetic skyrmion lattice, Phys. Rev. B103, L020403 (2021)

    work page 2021

  22. [22]

    Bhandari, P.-H

    H. Bhandari, P.-H. Chang, R. B. Regmi, B. G. M´ arkus, L. Forr´ o, J. F. Mitchell, I. I. Mazin, and N. J. Ghimire, Tunable topological transitions in the frustrated magnet hoagge, Communications Materials6, 52 (2025)

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Y. Xie, K. Ji, J. He, X. Shen, D. Wang, and J. Zhang, Manipulation of topology by electric field in breathing kagome lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 056701 (2025). 12

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Allein, A

    F. Allein, A. Anastasiadis, R. Chaunsali, I. Frankel, N. Boechler, F. K. Diakonos, and G. Theocharis, Strain topological metamaterials and revealing hidden topology in higher-order coordinates, Nature Communications14, 6633 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [25]

    H. S. Inbar, D. Q. Ho, S. Chatterjee, A. N. Engel, S. Khalid, C. P. Dempsey, M. Pendharkar, Y. H. Chang, S. Nishihaya, A. V. Fedorov, D. Lu, M. Hashimoto, D. Read, A. Janotti, and C. J. Palmstrøm, Tuning the band topology of gdsb by epitaxial strain, APL Materials 11, 111106 (2023)

    work page 2023

  26. [26]

    J. J. Sanchez, R. Aurora, D. Bennett, D. T. Lar- son, E. Kaxiras, and R. Comin, Switching topologi- cal states via uniaxial strain in 2d materials (2025), arXiv:2509.03854 [cond-mat.str-el]

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [27]

    M.-A. Miri, M. Heinrich, and D. N. Christodoulides, Supersymmetry-generated complex optical potentials with real spectra, Phys. Rev. A87, 43819 (2013)

    work page 2013

  28. [28]

    Queralt´ o, M

    G. Queralt´ o, M. Kremer, L. J. Maczewsky, M. Heinrich, J. Mompart, V. Ahufinger, and A. Szameit, Topological state engineering via supersymmetric transformations, Communications Physics3, 49 (2020)

    work page 2020

  29. [29]

    Viedma, G

    D. Viedma, G. Queralt´ o, J. Mompart, and V. Ahufin- ger, High-efficiency topological pumping with discrete su- persymmetry transformations, Optics Express30, 23531 (2022)

    work page 2022

  30. [30]

    L. J. Maczewsky, M. Heinrich, M. Kremer, S. K. Ivanov, M. Ehrhardt, F. Martinez, Y. V. Kartashov, V. V. Kono- top, L. Torner, D. Bauer, and A. Szameit, Nonlinearity- induced photonic topological insulator, Science370, 701 (2020)

    work page 2020

  31. [31]

    S. Xia, D. Kaltsas, D. Song, I. Komis, J. Xu, A. Szameit, H. Buljan, K. G. Makris, and Z. Chen, Nonlinear tun- ing of pt symmetry and non-hermitian topological states, Science372, 72 (2021)

    work page 2021

  32. [32]

    T. Dai, Y. Ao, J. Mao, Y. Yang, Y. Zheng, C. Zhai, Y. Li, J. Yuan, B. Tang, Z. Li, J. Luo, W. Wang, X. Hu, Q. Gong, and J. Wang, Non-hermitian topological phase transitions controlled by nonlinearity, Nature Physics20, 101 (2024)

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Jaksch and P

    D. Jaksch and P. Zoller, Creation of effective magnetic fields in optical lattices: the hofstadter butterfly for cold neutral atoms, New Journal of Physics5, 56 (2003)

    work page 2003

  34. [34]

    Y.-J. Lin, R. L. Compton, K. Jim´ enez-Garc´ ıa, J. V. Porto, and I. B. Spielman, Synthetic magnetic fields for ultracold neutral atoms, Nature462, 628 (2009)

    work page 2009

  35. [35]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and P. ¨Ohberg, Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys.83, 1523 (2011)

    work page 2011

  36. [36]

    Struck, C

    J. Struck, C. ¨Olschl¨ ager, M. Weinberg, P. Hauke, J. Si- monet, A. Eckardt, M. Lewenstein, K. Sengstock, and P. Windpassinger, Tunable gauge potential for neutral and spinless particles in driven optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.108, 225304 (2012)

    work page 2012

  37. [37]

    K. Fang, Z. Yu, and S. Fan, Realizing effective magnetic field for photons by controlling the phase of dynamic modulation, Nature Photonics6, 782 (2012)

    work page 2012

  38. [38]

    Aidelsburger, M

    M. Aidelsburger, M. Atala, M. Lohse, J. T. Barreiro, B. Paredes, and I. Bloch, Realization of the hofstadter hamiltonian with ultracold atoms in optical lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 185301 (2013)

    work page 2013

  39. [39]

    Hafezi, S

    M. Hafezi, S. Mittal, J. Fan, A. Migdall, and J. M. Tay- lor, Imaging topological edge states in silicon photonics, Nature Photonics7, 1001 (2013)

    work page 2013

  40. [40]

    Goldman and J

    N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Periodically driven quan- tum systems: Effective hamiltonians and engineered gauge fields, Phys. Rev. X4, 031027 (2014)

    work page 2014

  41. [41]

    J. Polo, J. Mompart, and V. Ahufinger, Geometrically induced complex tunnelings for ultracold atoms carry- ing orbital angular momentum, Physical Review A93, 033613 (2016)

    work page 2016

  42. [42]

    M., Daley, A

    Nicolau, E., Pelegr´ ı, G., Polo, J., Marques, A. M., Daley, A. J., Mompart, J., Dias, R. G., and Ahufinger, V., Ul- tracold atoms carrying orbital angular momentum: En- gineering topological phases in lattices, EPL145, 35001 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    Pelegr´ ı, A

    G. Pelegr´ ı, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias, A. J. Daley, V. Ahufinger, and J. Mompart, Topological edge states with ultracold atoms carrying orbital angular momen- tum in a diamond chain, Physical Review A99, 023612 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Pelegr´ ı, A

    G. Pelegr´ ı, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias, A. J. Daley, J. Mompart, and V. Ahufinger, Topological edge states and aharanov-bohm caging with ultracold atoms carry- ing orbital angular momentum, Phys. Rev. A99, 023613 (2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [45]

    Nicolau, A

    E. Nicolau, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias, J. Mompart, and V. Ahufinger, Many-body aharonov-bohm caging in a lattice of rings, Physical Review A107, 023305 (2023)

    work page 2023

  46. [46]

    Corman, L

    L. Corman, L. Chomaz, T. Bienaim´ e, R. Desbuquois, C. Weitenberg, S. Nascimb` ene, J. Dalibard, and J. Beugnon, Quench-induced supercurrents in an annular bose gas, Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 135302 (2014)

    work page 2014

  47. [47]

    K. C. Wright, R. B. Blakestad, C. J. Lobb, W. D. Phillips, and G. K. Campbell, Driving phase slips in a superfluid atom circuit with a rotating weak link, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 025302 (2013)

    work page 2013

  48. [48]

    M. F. Andersen, C. Ryu, P. Clad´ e, V. Natarajan, A. Vaziri, K. Helmerson, and W. D. Phillips, Quantized rotation of atoms from photons with orbital angular mo- mentum, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 170406 (2006)

    work page 2006

  49. [49]

    J¨ org, G

    C. J¨ org, G. Queralt´ o, M. Kremer, G. Pelegr´ ı, J. Schulz, A. Szameit, G. von Freymann, J. Mompart, and V. Ahufinger, Artificial gauge field switching using or- bital angular momentum modes in optical waveguides, Light: Science & Applications9, 150 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Jiang, Y

    C. Jiang, Y. Wu, M. Qin, and S. Ke, Topological bound modes with orbital angular momentum in optical waveg- uide arrays, Journal of Lightwave Technology41, 2205 (2023)

    work page 2023

  51. [51]

    Y. Wang, C. Jiang, M. Zhao, D. Zhao, and S. Ke, Com- pact topological edge modes through hybrid coupling of orbital angular momentum modes, Phys. Rev. A109, 063516 (2024)

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Viedma, A

    D. Viedma, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias, and V. Ahufin- ger, Flux-mediated effective su–schrieffer–heeger model in an impurity decorated diamond chain, APL Photonics 9, 120801 (2024)

    work page 2024

  53. [53]

    A. Celi, P. Massignan, J. Ruseckas, N. Goldman, I. B. Spielman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and M. Lewenstein, Synthetic gauge fields in synthetic dimensions, Physical Review Letters112, 043001 (2014)

    work page 2014

  54. [54]

    Ozawa, H

    T. Ozawa, H. M. Price, N. Goldman, O. Zilberberg, and I. Carusotto, Synthetic dimensions in integrated photon- ics: From optical isolation to four-dimensional quantum hall physics, Physical Review A93, 043827 (2016)

    work page 2016

  55. [55]

    L. Yuan, Q. Lin, M. Xiao, and S. Fan, Synthetic dimen- 13 sion in photonics, Optica5, 1396 (2018)

    work page 2018

  56. [56]

    D. Yu, W. Song, L. Wang, R. Srikanth, S. Kaushik Srid- har, T. Chen, C. Huang, G. Li, X. Qiao, X. Wu,et al., Comprehensive review on developments of synthetic di- mensions, Photonics Insights4, R06 (2025)

    work page 2025

  57. [57]

    Creutz, Aspects of chiral symmetry and the lattice, Rev

    M. Creutz, Aspects of chiral symmetry and the lattice, Rev. Mod. Phys.73, 119 (2001)

    work page 2001

  58. [58]

    Kuno, Extended flat band, entanglement, and topo- logical properties in a creutz ladder, Phys

    Y. Kuno, Extended flat band, entanglement, and topo- logical properties in a creutz ladder, Phys. Rev. B101, 184112 (2020)

    work page 2020

  59. [59]

    Zurita, C

    J. Zurita, C. E. Creffield, and G. Platero, Topology and interactions in the photonic creutz and creutz- hubbard ladders, Advanced Quantum Technologies3, 10.1002/qute.201900105 (2020)

    work page doi:10.1002/qute.201900105 2020

  60. [60]

    Y. Zhai, A. Usui, A. M. Marques, R. G. Dias, and V. Ahufinger, Topological bound states in a lattice of rings with nearest-neighbor interactions, Phys. Rev. A 113, 033303 (2026)

    work page 2026

  61. [61]

    Y. Liu, X. Chen, and Y. Xu, Topological phononics: From fundamental models to real materials, Advanced Functional Materials30, 1904784 (2020)

    work page 2020

  62. [62]

    Widmann, J

    S. Widmann, J. D¨ ureth, S. Dam, C. G. Mayer, D. Laibacher, M. Emmerling, M. Kamp, F. Reinert, M. ¨Unzelmann, S. Betzold, S. H¨ ofling, and S. Klembt, Direct experimental access to the bulk band inversion in a topological metamaterial (2025), arXiv:2511.08414 [physics.optics]

    work page arXiv 2025

  63. [63]

    A. M. Marques, D. Viedma, V. Ahufinger, and R. G. Dias, Impurity flat band states in the diamond chain, Communications Physics7, 387 (2024)

    work page 2024

  64. [64]

    Nicolau, A

    E. Nicolau, A. M. Marques, J. Mompart, R. G. Dias, and V. Ahufinger, Bosonic orbital su-schrieffer-heeger model in a lattice of rings, Phys. Rev. A108, 023317 (2023)

    work page 2023

  65. [65]

    W. P. Su, J. R. Schrieffer, and A. J. Heeger, Solitons in Polyacetylene, Phys. Rev. Lett.42, 1698 (1979)

    work page 1979

  66. [66]

    A. P. Schnyder, S. Ryu, A. Furusaki, and A. W. W. Lud- wig, Classification of topological insulators and super- conductors in three spatial dimensions, Phys. Rev. B78, 195125 (2008)

    work page 2008

  67. [67]

    D. Liu, P. Matveeva, D. Gutman, and S. T. Carr, El- ementary models of three-dimensional topological insu- lators with chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. B108, 035418 (2023)

    work page 2023

  68. [68]

    J. K. Asb´ oth, L. Oroszl´ any, and A. P. P´ alyi,A Short Course on Topological Insulators: Band Structure and Edge States in One and Two Dimensions(Springer In- ternational Publishing, 2016)

    work page 2016

  69. [69]

    Longhi, Quantum-optical analogies using photonic structures, Laser & Photonics Reviews3, 243 (2009)

    S. Longhi, Quantum-optical analogies using photonic structures, Laser & Photonics Reviews3, 243 (2009)

    work page 2009

  70. [70]

    Leykam and S

    D. Leykam and S. Flach, Perspective: Photonic flat- bands, APL Photonics3, 070901 (2018)

    work page 2018

  71. [71]

    R. A. Vicencio, Photonic flat band dynamics, Advances in Physics: X6, 1878057 (2021)

    work page 2021

  72. [72]

    C´ aceres-Aravena, D

    G. C´ aceres-Aravena, D. Guzm´ an-Silva, I. Salinas, and R. A. Vicencio, Controlled transport based on multior- bital aharonov-bohm photonic caging, Physical Review Letters128, 256602 (2022)

    work page 2022

  73. [73]

    Schulz, J

    J. Schulz, J. Noh, W. A. Benalcazar, G. Bahl, and G. von Freymann, Photonic quadrupole topological insulator us- ing orbital-induced synthetic flux, Nature Communica- tions13, 6597 (2022)

    work page 2022

  74. [74]

    Viedma, J

    D. Viedma, J. Mompart, and V. Ahufinger, Mode pump- ing in photonic lattices using a single tailored auxiliary waveguide, Physical Review A107, 023506 (2023)

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    X. Liu, Z. Lin, W. Song, J. Sun, C. Huang, S. Wu, X. Xiao, H. Xin, S. Zhu, and T. Li, Perfect excitation of topological states by supersymmetric waveguides, Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 016601 (2024)

    work page 2024

  76. [76]

    B. Real, D. Guzm´ an-Silva, and R. A. Vicen- cio, Radiation-based wave-packet generator in one- dimensional lattices, Physical Review B109, 064308 (2024)

    work page 2024

  77. [77]

    X. Liu, X. Han, W. Song, Y. Wang, Z. Lin, S. Wu, L. Zhong, S. Zhu, J. Qiu, and T. Li, Broadband selec- tive excitation of topological bound states in the con- tinuum within two-dimensional supersymmetric photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. B111, 075427 (2025)

    work page 2025

  78. [78]

    V. M. Martinez Alvarez and M. D. Coutinho-Filho, Edge states in trimer lattices, Phys. Rev. A99, 013833 (2019)

    work page 2019

  79. [79]

    D. Xie, W. Gou, T. Xiao, B. Gadway, and B. Yan, Topo- logical characterizations of an extended su–schrieffer– heeger model, npj Quantum Information5, 55 (2019)

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    A. N. Carroll, H. Hirzler, C. Miller, D. Wellnitz, S. R. Muleady, J. Lin, K. P. Zamarski, R. R. W. Wang, J. L. Bohn, A. M. Rey, and J. Ye, Observation of generalized ¡i¿t-j¡/i¿ spin dynamics with tunable dipolar interactions, Science388, 381 (2025)

    work page 2025

Showing first 80 references.