Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

A comparison theorem with applications to sharp geometric inequalities for submanifolds

T0 review · 4 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A comparison theorem for the normal exponential map yields sharp total-curvature and L^n mean-curvature inequalities for closed submanifolds.

desk verdict Nice determinant lemma and a correct sectional-curvature inequality, but the n-Ricci comparison theorem is false; the Willmore–Chen application collapses. read the letter →

arxiv 2605.06074 v2 pith:J4ZIQ7LZ submitted 2026-05-07 math.DG

Shengliang Pan , Chengyang Yi This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.DG MSC 53B3053C4053C21
keywords normalexponentialmapJacobiandeterminantcomparisontheoremn-RiccicurvatureChern-LashofinequalityWillmore-ChenEuclideanvolumegrowthumbilicalsubmanifolds
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper sets out to prove that a single Jacobian determinant governs sharp global inequalities for submanifolds: for the normal exponential map of a closed n-dimensional submanifold in a complete noncompact ambient space with nonnegative n-Ricci curvature and Euclidean volume growth, the paper claims the determinant is bounded by a model expression built from the mean curvature. From this bound it derives a Willmore–Chen-type inequality ∫Σ |H|^n dvol ≥ AVR(M)|S^n|, and, under nonnegative sectional curvature, a Fenchel–Borsuk–Chern–Lashof-type total-absolute-curvature inequality. The equality cases are described rigidly: the normal exponential map restricts to a diffeomorphism, and the submanifold is totally umbilical with parallel mean curvature vector. A corollary asserts the non-existence of closed minimal submanifolds in the allowed dimensions. The route is a determinant factorization combined with Hessian/Laplacian comparison in the ambient manifold.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Jacobian determinant of the normal exponential map exp⊥: T⊥Σ → M. The paper factorizes its differential as a block lower-triangular matrix (Lemma 2.4), separating the ambient exponential map's Jacobian from the determinant of Q = (1/2)Hess d² − h(·,·). The comparison theorem Theorem 2.11 then controls that determinant by the model-space-form expression (sδ/t)^{m−1}(cδ − sδ⟨H,ξ⟩)^n, using only an n-Ricci lower bound (plus an umbilicality assumption in the pointwise version). This comparison is what replaces the stronger sectional-curvature hypotheses of earlier comparison theorems in the high-codimension cases.

What would settle it

Test the n=2 case of Theorem 1.3 on the Eguchi-Hanson metric: it is Ricci-flat, has Euclidean volume growth, and contains a closed totally geodesic (minimal) S^2. Computing the tube volume growth of that S^2 under the normal exponential map — predicted by the pointwise bound |det exp⊥| ≤ 1 to be at most quadratic in the tube radius, while the ambient Euclidean volume growth forces quartic growth — would settle whether the theorem is true as stated.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is the determinant formula |det Φ_*| = |det Exp_*| · |det Q|, where Q = (1/2)Hess d² − h(·,·) (plus a Hessian of a gradient term in the general version). Applying this to the normal exponential map, the paper proves Theorem 2.11: under Ric_M^n ≥ nδ, with an umbilical point and mean curvature at least the model value, |det exp⊥_*(x,tξ)| ≤ (sδ(t)/t)^{m−1}(cδ(t) − sδ(t)⟨H,ξ⟩)^n. Setting δ=0 and integrating this pointwise bound over the unit normal bundle yields the Willmore–Chen-type inequality in Theorem 1.3, with equality forcing the normal exponential map to be a diffeomorphism and the submanifold to be totally umbilical with D⊥-parallel mean curvature.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that nonnegative n-Ricci curvature plus Euclidean volume growth forces the pointwise Jacobian bound to hold for every closed submanifold and thereby makes closed minimal submanifolds impossible — yet the paper's own Eguchi-Hanson example, with its closed totally geodesic S^2, appears to contradict the n=2 case of that premise.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If Ric_M^n ≥ 0 and AVR(M)>0, every closed n-dimensional submanifold satisfies ∫Σ |H|^n dvol ≥ AVR(M)|S^n|; equality forces exp⊥ to be a diffeomorphism, total umbilicality, and parallel mean curvature.
  • Under nonnegative sectional curvature, the total absolute curvature satisfies ∫Σ K* dvol ≥ 2 AVR(M)|S^{n+m−1}|, with equality as described in Theorem 1.1.
  • There is no closed minimal k-dimensional submanifold for n ≤ k ≤ N−1 in a complete noncompact N-manifold with nonnegative n-Ricci curvature and Euclidean volume growth.
  • The comparison theorem weakens the Heintze–Karcher sectional-curvature condition to an n-Ricci bound in the umbilical high-codimension case.
  • The determinant formula itself works with an added gradient field, so it applies to a family of maps beyond exp⊥ and may have further comparison consequences.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pointwise bound used in the proof of (1.4) is stated in Theorem 2.11 only under umbilicality; a trace-Hessian-plus-AM-GM argument would likely repair it, but the text does not supply that step.
  • The introduction's Eguchi-Hanson example (Ricci-flat with Euclidean volume growth and a closed totally geodesic S^2) appears to be a direct counterexample to the n=2 case of Theorem 1.3; reconciling it requires an extra hypothesis or a different reading of n-Ricci curvature.
  • The same determinant comparison should yield sharp volume comparisons for tubular neighborhoods and isoperimetric-type bounds for higher-codimension submanifolds under intermediate Ricci curvature; the paper indicates but does not carry these out.
  • The equality metric (1−⟨H,y⟩)^2 gΣ + gT⊥Σ is formally the Euclidean cone-type metric, so the paper's equality analysis suggests asking whether equality forces the ambient manifold to be Euclidean, a question the authors leave open.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper derives an explicit formula for the Jacobian determinant of the normal exponential map (Lemma 2.4), uses it to prove a submanifold comparison theorem (Theorem 2.11), and applies it to obtain a Fenchel–Borsuk–Chern–Lashof-type inequality under nonnegative sectional curvature (Theorem 1.1) and a Willmore–Chen-type inequality under nonnegative n-Ricci curvature (Theorem 1.3), together with equality-case rigidity statements. The central claimed novelty is Theorem 2.11(ii): under Ric_M^n ≥ nδ, an umbilical submanifold with hH,ξi ≥ hH,ξi satisfies the pointwise normal-exponential Jacobian bound (2.31).

Significance. If correct, Theorem 2.11 would constitute a genuine extension of the Heintze–Karcher comparison theorem and would give sharp global inequalities in a broad Riemannian setting. The paper also contains useful independent material: the determinant decomposition in Lemma 2.4, the localized cut-distance function τ̃_f, and the Hessian monotonicity statement Theorem 2.9 are all presented with substantial detail. However, the central comparison theorem (ii) is false as stated, and the proof of Theorem 1.3 relies on an unjustified application of it. Since the main advertised application and the comparison theorem itself are load-bearing, the manuscript in its current form cannot be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Theorem 2.11(ii), Eq. (2.31)] The statement is false. Let M = H^2(-1) × S^3(2), with n=3, m=2. A direct computation gives Ric_M^3 ≥ 0: for v in the H factor, the minimum 3-plane sum is -1+2+2 = 3; for v in the S factor it is -2+2 = 0. Take Σ = {p} × S^3, which is closed and totally geodesic, so H=0 and it is umbilical. Choose orthonormal ξ, e_1 ∈ T_p H^2. For the normal exponential map in the e_1 direction, the vertical Jacobi field satisfies Y'' − Y = 0 with Y(0)=0, Y′(0)=e_1, so |Y(t)| = sinh t; all other factors are 1. Thus |det exp^⊥_*(x,tξ)| = sinh t for every t before the cut/focal distance, which is infinite in H^2. With δ=0, the right-hand side of (2.31) is (s_0(t)/t)^{m-1}(c_0(t) − 0)^n = 1·1^3 = 1, contradicting sinh t > 1 for any t>0.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 2.11(ii), use of Lemma 2.8(i)] The proof asserts the bound |det exp^⊥_*| ≤ (s_δ(t)/t)^{m-1} ... by applying Bishop's Lemma 2.8(i) with l = m−1 to the normal directions. But Lemma 2.8(i) requires Ric_M^{m−1} ≥ (m−1)δ, which is not assumed. The hypothesis Ric_M^n ≥ nδ only controls n-planes perpendicular to ξ, in particular T_xΣ; it gives no control of the remaining m−1 normal directions. The counterexample in the previous comment shows this is not a mere technical gap: the missing normal Jacobian factor is genuinely unbounded.
  3. [Section 6, proof of inequality (1.4)] The proof applies Theorem 2.11 directly to obtain the pointwise bound |det exp^⊥_*(x,y)| ≤ (1 − hH(x),y)^n for an arbitrary closed submanifold. Theorem 2.11(ii) is stated only under the hypothesis that Σ is umbilical at x for the normal ξ, which is not satisfied by a general submanifold. Even if the tangent-factor estimate could be repaired by an arithmetic-geometric-mean inequality on the trace in Lemma 2.7, the normal Jacobian factor discussed above remains uncontrolled. Thus inequality (1.4) is unsupported as written.
  4. [Corollary 1.4 and equality cases of Theorem 1.3] The corollary and the equality characterization in Theorem 1.3 depend on Theorem 2.11(ii) and on Lemma 7.4, which in turn invokes Theorem 2.11. Since Theorem 2.11(ii) is false, these conclusions are not established.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] Typo: 'esitimate' should be 'estimate'.
  2. [Proof of Theorem 2.11] The proof refers to 'Theorem 2.8' where the intended reference is apparently Lemma 2.8.
  3. [Throughout] Several spelling/grammar issues occur, e.g. 'satiesfying' (Lemmas 4.4, 7.2), 'sufficiency'/'sufficient' throughout, and inconsistent punctuation in displayed inequalities. These do not affect the mathematics.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the derivation is a standard comparison-theory chain from Bishop/Heintze–Karcher inputs; suspected flaws are correctness issues, not equivalence-by-construction.

full rationale

I walked the claimed derivation chain. Lemma 2.4 is an explicit differential computation, not a renaming of the target inequality; Theorems 2.10 and 2.11 are proved from Bishop's Lemmas 2.7/2.8, and the applications in Sections 3–6 use the area formula with those comparison bounds. No parameter is fitted to the submanifold data and then renamed a prediction; the asymptotic volume ratio is an ambient invariant, not a fit to Σ. The paper contains no load-bearing self-citation: the cited Heintze–Karcher, Bishop, Wang, and Cordero-Erausquin–McCann–Schmuckenschläger results are external and are used as tools, with attribution. The reader's/skeptic's objections (that Theorem 2.11(ii) may not follow from n-Ricci alone, and that Section 6 applies it without the umbilicality hypothesis) concern mathematical validity, not circularity: even if those bounds fail, they are not the inputs of the derivation restated as outputs. Omitted 'similar' proofs (e.g., sufficiency of Theorem 1.3) are gaps, not self-referential support. Hence no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters are fitted and no new geometric entities are postulated. The paper relies on standard comparison and area-formula tools, on a standard asymptotic tube-volume fact that is not explicitly justified, and on one unstated extension of Theorem 2.11 in Section 6.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Bishop comparison lemmas (Lemmas 2.7 and 2.8) for Hessians and Jacobi-field volumes under Ric_l ≥ lδ or sectional curvature upper bounds.
    Used in the proofs of Theorems 2.10 and 2.11; these are standard comparison results taken from Bishop–Crittenden.
  • standard math Area formula for the normal exponential map with multiplicity, applied on truncated normal bundles U_{r0} and Ũ_{r0}.
    The derivation of inequalities (1.3) and (1.4) converts tube volumes into normal-bundle integrals; the area formula is invoked without proof.
  • domain assumption Asymptotic tube-volume identity |Ω_{r0}| / (ω_{n+m} r0^{n+m}) → AVR(M,ḡ) for compact Σ in a nonnegatively curved manifold with Euclidean volume growth.
    Used to pass from tube-volume upper bounds to the AVR constants in both main inequalities. It follows from Bishop–Gromov and compactness, but is not stated or proved in the paper.
  • ad hoc to paper Theorem 2.11(ii) remains valid without the stated umbilical hypothesis, or an equivalent trace-AM-GM bound applies to general submanifolds.
    Section 6 derives the inequality (1.4) by bounding |det exp^⊥_*| by (1−⟨H,y⟩)^n for arbitrary Σ, although the quoted theorem requires Σ to be umbilical. This is the paper's largest unproven implicit assumption.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A comparison theorem with applications to sharp geometric inequalities for submanifolds." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/J4ZIQ7LZ

@misc{pith2026260506074,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A comparison theorem with applications to sharp geometric inequalities for submanifolds},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/J4ZIQ7LZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2605.06074}
}
read the original abstract

In this paper, we derive an explicit expression for the Jacobian determinant of the normal exponential map on a submanifold, establishing a relationship with its ambient counterpart. This formula leads to a new comparison theorem which is closely related to the comparison theorem of Heintze-Karcher. As applications, we obtain a Fenchel-Borsuk-Chern-Lashof-type inequality and a Willmore-Chen-type inequality on closed submanifolds in complete noncompact manifolds with nonnegative curvature and Euclidean volume growth.

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fenchel-Willmore-Chen inequality under lower bounds on weighted intermediate Ricci curvature

    math.DG 2026-08 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The paper proves a Fenchel-Willmore-Chen inequality for submanifolds in smooth metric measure spaces with lower bounds on the 1-Bakry-Emery n-Ricci curvature, plus Sobolev and isoperimetric inequalities under nonnegat...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 1 linked inside Pith · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Agostiniani, M

    V. Agostiniani, M. Fogagnolo and L. Mazzieri, Sharp geometric inequalities for closed hypersurfaces in manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature, Invent. math., 222, 2020, 1033–1101

    2020

  2. [2]

    M. T. Anderson, Short geodesics and gravitational instantons, J. Differential Geom. 31 (1990), no. 1, 265–275

    1990

  3. [3]

    R. L. Bishop and R. J. Crittenden, Geometry of manifolds , Pure and Applied Mathematics, Vol. XV, Academic Press, New York-London, 1964

    1964

  4. [4]

    Borsuk, Sur la courbure totale des courbes fermées, Ann

    K. Borsuk, Sur la courbure totale des courbes fermées, Ann. Soc. Polon. Math., 20, 1947￿ 251–265

    1947

  5. [5]

    Brendle, Constant mean curvature surfaces in warped product manifolds, Publ

    S. Brendle, Constant mean curvature surfaces in warped product manifolds, Publ. Math. Inst. Hautes Études Sci. 117 (2013), 247–269

    2013

  6. [6]

    Brendle, The isoperimetric inequality for a minimal submanifold in Euclidean space, J

    S. Brendle, The isoperimetric inequality for a minimal submanifold in Euclidean space, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 34 (2021), no. 2, 595–603

    2021

  7. [7]

    Brendle, Sobolev inequalities in manifolds with nonnegative curvature, Comm

    S. Brendle, Sobolev inequalities in manifolds with nonnegative curvature, Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 76, 2023￿ 2192–2218

    2023

  8. [8]

    Brendle, Geometric inequalities and the Alexandrov-Bakelman-Pucci technique, Preprint, available at arXiv:2603.12025

    S. Brendle, Geometric inequalities and the Alexandrov-Bakelman-Pucci technique, Preprint, available at arXiv:2603.12025

    arXiv

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    Brickell and C.-C

    F. Brickell and C.-C. Hsiung, The total absolute curvature of closed curves in Riemannian manifolds, J. Differential Geometry 9 (1974), 177–193

    1974

  2. [10]

    Cederbaum and A

    C. Cederbaum and A. Miehe, A new proof of the Willmore inequality via a divergence inequality, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 378 (2025), no. 9, 6655–6676

    2025

  3. [11]

    Cheeger and D

    J. Cheeger and D. G. Ebin, Comparison theorems in Riemannian geometry , revised reprint of the 1975 original, AMS Chelsea Publ., Providence, RI, 2008. 37

    1975

  4. [12]

    Chen, On an inequality of T

    B.-Y. Chen, On an inequality of T. J. Willmore, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 26, 1970￿ 473–479

    1970

  5. [13]

    Chen, On the total curvature of immersed manifolds

    B.-Y. Chen, On the total curvature of immersed manifolds. I. An inequality of Fenchel-Borsuk- Willmore, Amer. J. Math., 93, 1971￿ 148–162

    1971

  6. [14]

    Y. Chen, Q. He and Y. Qian, On hypersurfaces with constant mean curvature in Finsler manifolds, Results Math. 80 (2025), no. 3, Paper No. 84, 19 pp

    2025

  7. [15]

    S. S. Chern and R. K. Lashof, On the total curvature of immersed manifolds, Amer. J. Math., 79, 1957￿ 306–318

    1957

  8. [16]

    S. S. Chern and R. K. Lashof, On the total curvature of immersed manifolds. II, Michigan Math. J. 5 (1958), 5–12

    1958

  9. [17]

    J. Choe, M. Ghomi and M. Ritoré, Total positive curvature of hypersurfaces with convex boundary, J. Differential Geom. 72 (2006), no. 1, 129–147

    2006

  10. [18]

    Cordero-Erausquin, R

    D. Cordero-Erausquin, R. J. McCann and M. Schmuckenschläger, A Riemannian interpolation in- equality à la Borell, Brascamp and Lieb, Invent. Math., 146(2), 2001￿ 219–257

    2001

  11. [19]

    M. P. do Carmo, Riemannian geometry, translated from the second Portuguese edition by Francis Flaherty, Mathematics: Theory & Applications, Birkhäuser Boston, Boston, MA, 1992

    1992

  12. [20]

    Domínguez-Vázquez, D

    M. Domínguez-Vázquez, D. González-Álvaro and L. Mouillé, Infinite families of manifolds of positive kth-intermediate Ricci curvature with k small, Math. Ann. 386 (2023), no. 3-4, 1979–2014

    2023

  13. [21]

    Eguchi and A

    T. Eguchi and A. J. Hanson, Self-dual solutions to Euclidean gravity, Ann. Physics 120 (1979), no. 1, 82–106

    1979

  14. [22]

    Fenchel, Über Krümmung und Windung geschlossener Raumkurven, Math

    W. Fenchel, Über Krümmung und Windung geschlossener Raumkurven, Math. Ann., 101(1), 1929￿ 238–252

    1929

  15. [23]

    Fáry, Sur la courbure totale d’une courbe gauche faisant un nœud, Bull

    I. Fáry, Sur la courbure totale d’une courbe gauche faisant un nœud, Bull. Soc. Math. France 77 (1949), 128–138

    1949

  16. [24]

    Fogagnolo and A

    M. Fogagnolo and A. Pinamonti, New integral estimates in substatic Riemannian manifolds and the Alexandrov theorem, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 163 (2022), 299–317

    2022

  17. [25]

    Heintze and H

    E. Heintze and H. Karcher, A general comparison theorem with applications to volume estimates for submanifolds, Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4), 11(4), 1978￿ 451–470

    1978

  18. [26]

    J. A. Hoisington, On the total curvature and Betti numbers of complex projective manifolds, Geom. Topol. 26 (2022), no. 1, 1–45

    2022

  19. [27]

    Y. Hu, Y. Wei, C. Xia and T. Zhou, A Heintze-Karcher-type inequality for capillary hypersurfaces in a hyperbolic half-space, J. Funct. Anal. 289 (2025), no. 6, Paper No. 110970, 24 pp

    2025

  20. [28]

    Itoh and M

    J.-I. Itoh and M. Tanaka, The Lipschitz continuity of the distance function to the cut locus, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 353 (2001), no. 1, 21–40

    2001

  21. [29]

    X. Jia, G. Wang, C. Xia and X. Zhang, Willmore-type inequality in unbounded convex sets, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 111 (2025), no. 3, Paper No. e70105, 24 pp

    2025

  22. [30]

    X. Jia, C. Xia and X. Zhang, A Heintze-Karcher-type inequality for hypersurfaces with capillary boundary, J. Geom. Anal. 33 (2023), no. 6, Paper No. 177, 19 pp

    2023

  23. [31]

    Ketterer and A

    C. Ketterer and A. Mondino, Sectional and intermediate Ricci curvature lower bounds via optimal transport, Adv. Math. 329 (2018), 781–818

    2018

  24. [32]

    Li and C

    J. Li and C. Xia, An integral formula and its applications on sub-static manifolds, J. Differential Geom. 113 (2019), no. 3, 493–518

    2019

  25. [33]

    Lee and F

    J. Lee and F. Ricci, The log-Sobolev inequality for a submanifold in manifolds with asymptotic non- negative intermediate Ricci curvature, J. Geom. Anal. 34 (2024), no. 5, Paper No. 141, 19 pp

    2024

  26. [34]

    Ma and J

    H. Ma and J. Wu, Sobolev inequalities in manifolds with nonnegative intermediate Ricci curvature, J. Geom. Anal. 34 (2024), no. 3, Paper No. 93, 16 pp

    2024

  27. [35]

    J. W. Milnor, On the total curvature of knots, Ann. of Math. (2) 52 (1950), 248–257

    1950

  28. [36]

    Mouillé, Torus actions on manifolds with positive intermediate Ricci curvature, J

    L. Mouillé, Torus actions on manifolds with positive intermediate Ricci curvature, J. Lond. Math. Soc. (2) 106 (2022), no. 4, 3792–3821

    2022

  29. [37]

    W. D. Pepe, On the total curvature of C 1 hypersurfaces in En+1, Amer. J. Math. 91 (1969), 984–1002

    1969

  30. [38]

    Petersen, Riemannian geometry, third edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 171, Springer, Cham, 2016

    P. Petersen, Riemannian geometry, third edition, Graduate Texts in Mathematics, 171, Springer, Cham, 2016

    2016

  31. [39]

    Reiser and D

    P. Reiser and D. J. Wraith, Intermediate Ricci curvatures and Gromov’s Betti number bound, J. Geom. Anal. 33 (2023), no. 12, Paper No. 364, 20 pp

    2023

  32. [40]

    Ros, Compact hypersurfaces with constant higher order mean curvatures, Rev

    A. Ros, Compact hypersurfaces with constant higher order mean curvatures, Rev. Mat. Iberoamericana 3 (1987), no. 3-4, 447–453

    1987

  33. [41]

    Shen, On complete manifolds of nonnegative kth-Ricci curvature, Trans

    Z. Shen, On complete manifolds of nonnegative kth-Ricci curvature, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 338 (1993), no. 1, 289–310. 38

    1993

  34. [42]

    Wang, Optimal transport approach to Michael-Simon-Sobolev inequalities in manifolds with intermediate Ricci curvature lower bounds, Ann

    K.-H. Wang, Optimal transport approach to Michael-Simon-Sobolev inequalities in manifolds with intermediate Ricci curvature lower bounds, Ann. Global Anal. Geom. 65 (2024), no. 1, Paper No. 7, 25 pp

    2024

  35. [43]

    Wang, Remark on an inequality for closed hypersurfaces in complete manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature, Ann

    X. Wang, Remark on an inequality for closed hypersurfaces in complete manifolds with nonnegative Ricci curvature, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6), 32, 2023￿ 173–178

    2023

  36. [44]

    J. L. Weiner, Total curvature and total absolute curvature of immersed submanifolds of spheres, J. Differential Geometry 9 (1974), 391–400

    1974

  37. [45]

    Al. I. Cuza

    T. J. Willmore, Mean curvature of immersed surfaces, An. Şti. Univ. “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi Secţ. I a Mat. (N.S.), 14, 1968￿ 99–103. School of Mathematical Sciences, Tongji University. No.1239, Siping Road, Shanghai, China. Email address : slpan@tongji.edu.cn School of Mathematical...

    1968

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.