pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.08852 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-09 · 📡 eess.SP

Recognition: no theorem link

Holographic Surface Enabled Integrated Sensing and Communications

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 01:01 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP
keywords reconfigurable holographic surfacesintegrated sensing and communicationsholographic beamformingultra-massive MIMOleaky-wave antennas6G networksjoint optimization
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reconfigurable holographic surfaces enable cost-efficient ultra-massive MIMO for joint sensing and communications.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This tutorial introduces holographic integrated sensing and communications (HISAC) as a way to scale integrated sensing and communications to ultra-massive MIMO without the prohibitive cost and power of conventional phased arrays. It shows how reconfigurable holographic surfaces, acting as leaky-wave antennas, support holographic beamforming that jointly handles data transmission and environmental sensing while respecting a leakage power constraint. The paper develops a general optimization framework, demonstrates gains in joint, sensing-assisted, and communication-assisted modes, and reports system implementations with experimental results to illustrate practical feasibility under hardware limits.

Core claim

HISAC employs reconfigurable holographic surfaces (RHSs), a type of leaky-wave antenna, as a cost- and energy-efficient implementation of ultra-massive MIMO-based ISAC, and offers enhanced flexibility for ISAC beam synthesis through holographic beamforming.

What carries the argument

Reconfigurable holographic surfaces (RHSs) with holographic beamforming under a leakage power constraint, which replaces complex phase-shifter networks and enables joint optimization of communication and sensing beams.

If this is right

  • HISAC jointly supports communication and sensing with lower cost and energy use than phased-array ultra-massive MIMO.
  • The same surfaces enable sensing-assisted communication and communication-assisted sensing modes through a unified optimization framework.
  • Practical implementations demonstrate feasible beam synthesis and performance under hardware constraints.
  • The approach opens pathways to efficient, flexible, and high-performance ISAC networks for 6G.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The leakage-power model may allow simpler hardware calibration routines than full phase-shifter arrays.
  • Integration with existing 6G waveforms could reduce the need for separate radar and communication hardware at base stations.
  • Further work on surface reconfiguration speed would determine suitability for mobile sensing scenarios.

Load-bearing premise

The leakage power constraint of holographic beamforming can be incorporated into a general optimization framework that still yields meaningful joint communication and sensing performance gains under practical hardware limits.

What would settle it

Measurements on a prototype RHS system that show no reduction in power or hardware cost relative to a comparable phased array, or that fail to achieve target joint sensing and communication rates when the leakage constraint is enforced.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.08852 by Boya Di, Haobo Zhang, Hongliang Zhang, Lianlin Li, Lin Chang, Lingyang Song, M\'erouane Debbah, Rui Zhang, Shaohui Sun, Shuhao Zeng, Shupei Zhang, Weixiang Jiang, Xinyuan Hu, Yonina Eldar, Zhu Han.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Use cases of HISAC. ter, the holographic pattern is designed solely to optimize communication-oriented metrics such as achievable rate and outage probability, and the receiver only performs data de￾coding. By contrast, HISAC must simultaneously satisfy both communication and sensing requirements. This calls for new models that characterize the propagation of both communi￾cation and sensing signals, as well… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Outline of this paper. on reflective metasurfaces such as RIS/IRS1 , while RHSs, which operate as compact radiating apertures with embedded feeding structures, have remained largely unexplored in exist￾ing surveys and tutorials. As discussed earlier, HISAC exhibits a number of distinctive advantages such as low cost, low power consumption, and tunable coverage, which endow it with promising potential for f… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Illustration of optical holographic principle. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Diagram of an RHS: (a) perspective view; (b) bottom view. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Comparison of (a) RHS structure and (b) RIS/IRS structure. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Advantages of HISAC. where J(θ) is the FIM of θ, quantifying how much informa￾tion the observation, i.e., the received signals, carries about the unknown parameters θ. More specifically, the FIM can be expressed as J(θ) = −E [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of HDMA. RHSs do not rely on complex phase shifters or parallel feeding networks, the aperture can be efficiently enlarged to realize ultra-massive MIMO. As a result, HISAC can achieve a high array gain, which enhances both the communication link budget and the sensing performance under the same transmit power constraint. • High Spatial Resolution: The large aperture also leads to a narrower m… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of effective aperture with: (a) tunable coverage; (b) movable position. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Relationship among RHS hardware, variables, constraints, and HISAC [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Communication and sensing performance tradeoff with: (a) single target and LoS communication link; (b) two targets and a two-path communication [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: HISAC-enabled joint communication and sensing: (a) Scenario; (b) Beamforming architecture. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Cost-effectiveness of the proposed scheme over the PA-based scheme [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Minimum sensing SINR versus the number of users [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Mutual coupling-aware holographic beamforming: (a) Illustration of coupled dipole approximations for RHSs; (b) Sidelobe levels versus iteration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Sensing-assisted channel estimation for large-scale RHS: (a) The angular-domain transform result of a hybrid-field channel consisting of a far-field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Sensing-assisted beam training: (a) Multi-user angular codebook structure for holographic beamforming; (b) Multi-user distance-adaptive codebook [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Sensing-assisted beam training with adjustable aperture position: (a) Channel gain versus the location of the sliding window; (b) Beam training error [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p025_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: Holographic beamforming-enabled distributed sensing: (a) A holographic beamforming-enabled distributed sensing network; (b) SINR versus the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_18.png] view at source ↗
Figure 19
Figure 19. Figure 19: RHS element: (a) Architecture; (b) Radiated power of an RHS element versus the applied bias voltage. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_19.png] view at source ↗
Figure 20
Figure 20. Figure 20: RHS array with: (a) One feed; (b) Four feeds. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_20.png] view at source ↗
Figure 21
Figure 21. Figure 21: Radiation patterns of the RHS array. Hornantenna ofRx USRPandhost computerofRx USRPandhost computerofTx Frequency converter Frequencyconverter RHS (a) Noise-120dB Signal-90dB (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_21.png] view at source ↗
Figure 22
Figure 22. Figure 22: Holographic beamforming-enabled communication: (a) Prototype; (b) Spectrum, constellation, and video snapshot of the Rx. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_22.png] view at source ↗
Figure 23
Figure 23. Figure 23: Holographic beamforming-enabled sensing: (a) Prototype; (b) Angle estimation result; (c) Range estimation result. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_23.png] view at source ↗
Figure 24
Figure 24. Figure 24: Holographic beamforming-enabled JCAS: (a) Prototype; (b) Experimental results. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_24.png] view at source ↗
Figure 25
Figure 25. Figure 25: Holographic beamforming-enabled SAC: (a) Prototype; (b) Received SNR versus position of sliding window. The received SINR significantly varies [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_25.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Integrated sensing and communications (ISAC) is an essential 6G capability for joint data transmission and environmental sensing. To support 6G scenarios with stringent ISAC performance requirements, existing massive-MIMO-based systems are expected to scale toward ultra-massive MIMO. However, this scaling incurs prohibitive cost and power consumption when realized using widely adopted phased arrays with complex phase shifters and feeding networks. Recently, holographic integrated sensing and communications (HISAC) has emerged as a promising paradigm to address this issue. It employs reconfigurable holographic surfaces (RHSs), a type of leaky-wave antenna, as a cost- and energy-efficient implementation of ultra-massive MIMO-based ISAC, and offers enhanced flexibility for ISAC beam synthesis through holographic beamforming. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive tutorial on HISAC, focusing on how RHS-enabled holographic beamforming can be exploited to jointly support communication and sensing under practical hardware constraints. We first introduce the fundamentals of RHSs and discuss the unique leakage power constraint of holographic beamforming. We then present a general optimization framework for HISAC and show how HISAC enhances joint communication and sensing, sensing-assisted communication, and communication-assisted sensing. We further present HISAC system implementations and experimental results. Finally, we outline promising research directions for HISAC, highlighting the potential of HISAC in advancing efficient, flexible, and high-performance ISAC networks.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper is a tutorial on holographic integrated sensing and communications (HISAC) that employs reconfigurable holographic surfaces (RHSs) as a cost- and energy-efficient means to realize ultra-massive MIMO-based ISAC for 6G. It introduces the fundamentals of RHSs and the leakage power constraint in holographic beamforming, presents a general optimization framework for joint communication and sensing, demonstrates enhancements in joint ISAC, sensing-assisted communication, and communication-assisted sensing, describes system implementations and experimental results, and outlines future research directions.

Significance. If the described optimization framework successfully integrates the leakage power constraint while delivering verifiable performance improvements in communication and sensing tasks, and if the experimental results confirm these gains under realistic hardware conditions, the tutorial could play a significant role in guiding the development of efficient ISAC systems. It highlights a promising alternative to traditional phased arrays, potentially reducing cost and power consumption in ultra-massive MIMO setups, which is critical for practical 6G deployment. The comprehensive coverage may also serve as an educational resource for researchers entering this area.

major comments (2)
  1. [Optimization framework] Optimization framework section: The abstract states that the leakage power constraint of holographic beamforming is folded into a general optimization framework that still yields meaningful joint communication and sensing performance gains under practical hardware limits. Without the explicit formulation, objective functions, or feasibility analysis in this section, it is impossible to determine whether the constraint is handled in a non-trivial manner or simply reduces the feasible set without delivering the claimed enhancements; this is load-bearing for the central claim of practical applicability.
  2. [Experimental results] Experimental results section: The manuscript claims to present HISAC system implementations and experimental results demonstrating the benefits. To support the claims of cost-efficiency and performance gains relative to phased-array baselines, this section must include specific details on hardware setups, performance metrics (e.g., rate, sensing accuracy), comparison baselines, and statistical analysis; the abstract provides none of these, preventing assessment of empirical support for the tutorial's conclusions.
minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract is clearly organized but would benefit from a single sentence summarizing one key quantitative outcome from the experimental results (e.g., a reported gain in spectral efficiency or sensing resolution) to better convey the practical impact.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed review and constructive feedback on our tutorial manuscript. We address the major comments point by point below, clarifying the content of the relevant sections and indicating revisions where appropriate to enhance clarity and support for the claims.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [Optimization framework] Optimization framework section: The abstract states that the leakage power constraint of holographic beamforming is folded into a general optimization framework that still yields meaningful joint communication and sensing performance gains under practical hardware limits. Without the explicit formulation, objective functions, or feasibility analysis in this section, it is impossible to determine whether the constraint is handled in a non-trivial manner or simply reduces the feasible set without delivering the claimed enhancements; this is load-bearing for the central claim of practical applicability.

    Authors: The optimization framework section of the full manuscript formulates the HISAC problem as a non-convex optimization that explicitly incorporates the leakage power constraint as a key restriction on the holographic beamforming weights, alongside the communication rate maximization and sensing beampattern matching objectives. The objective is a weighted combination of these metrics, and we include a feasibility discussion showing that the constraint is active yet permits meaningful performance improvements via techniques such as alternating optimization. Subsequent sections on joint ISAC enhancements provide numerical validation of the gains under hardware limits. To address the concern about explicitness, we will expand the section with additional mathematical details and a dedicated feasibility subsection in the revision. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Experimental results] Experimental results section: The manuscript claims to present HISAC system implementations and experimental results demonstrating the benefits. To support the claims of cost-efficiency and performance gains relative to phased-array baselines, this section must include specific details on hardware setups, performance metrics (e.g., rate, sensing accuracy), comparison baselines, and statistical analysis; the abstract provides none of these, preventing assessment of empirical support for the tutorial's conclusions.

    Authors: The experimental results section details the HISAC implementations with reconfigurable holographic surface prototypes, specifying hardware parameters such as meta-atom count, operating frequency, and power consumption. It reports metrics including communication rates and sensing accuracy (e.g., angle estimation RMSE), with direct comparisons to phased-array baselines demonstrating cost and energy reductions. Statistical analysis from repeated trials is included to support the observed gains. While the abstract summarizes without these specifics, the section provides the empirical evidence. We will add a summary table of key metrics, baselines, and results for improved readability in the revision. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity detected; tutorial abstract presents no derivation chain

full rationale

The abstract introduces HISAC as an emerging paradigm employing RHSs for ultra-massive MIMO ISAC and outlines a tutorial structure covering fundamentals, optimization, implementations, and directions. No equations, fitted parameters, predictions, or self-referential derivations are present. Claims rest on external literature references rather than internal reductions to inputs by construction, satisfying the criteria for a non-circular tutorial overview with no load-bearing steps to inspect.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The tutorial rests on domain assumptions about RHS hardware behavior and the practicality of holographic beamforming under leakage constraints; no free parameters or new invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Reconfigurable holographic surfaces can be treated as leaky-wave antennas whose leakage power must be explicitly constrained in beamforming design.
    Stated when introducing the unique leakage power constraint of holographic beamforming.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5569 in / 1281 out tokens · 43309 ms · 2026-05-12T01:01:12.450222+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

175 extracted references · 175 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    A survey on fundamental limits of integrated sensing and communication,

    A. Liu, Z. Huang, M. Li, Y . Wan, W. Li, T. X. Han, C. Liu, R. Du, D. K. P. Tan, J. Lu, Y . Shen, F. Colone, and K. Chetty, “A survey on fundamental limits of integrated sensing and communication,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 994–1034, Feb. 2022. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2025 35

  2. [2]

    Challenges and opportunities of sub-6 GHz integrated sensing and communications for 5G-advanced and beyond,

    H. Yuhong, “Challenges and opportunities of sub-6 GHz integrated sensing and communications for 5G-advanced and beyond,”Chin. J. Electron., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 323–325, Mar. 2024

  3. [3]

    A survey of autonomous driving from a deep learning perspective,

    J. Zhao, Y . Wu, R. Deng, S. Xu, J. Gao, and A. Burke, “A survey of autonomous driving from a deep learning perspective,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 57, no. 10, pp. 1–60, May 2025

  4. [4]

    Integrated sensing and communication for low altitude economy: Opportunities and challenges,

    Y . Jiang, X. Li, G. Zhu, H. Li, J. Deng, K. Han, C. Shen, Q. Shi, and R. Zhang, “Integrated sensing and communication for low altitude economy: Opportunities and challenges,”IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 63, no. 12, pp. 72–78, Dec. 2025

  5. [5]

    Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,

    Z. Wei, H. Qu, Y . Wang, X. Yuan, H. Wu, Y . Du, K. Han, N. Zhang, and Z. Feng, “Integrated sensing and communication signals toward 5G-A and 6G: A survey,”IEEE Int. Things J., vol. 10, no. 13, pp. 11 068–11 092, Jul. 2023

  6. [6]

    ISAC – a survey on its layered architecture, technologies, standardizations, prototypes and testbeds,

    X. Luo, Q. Lin, R. Zhang, H.-H. Chen, X. Wang, and M. Huang, “ISAC – a survey on its layered architecture, technologies, standardizations, prototypes and testbeds,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 28, pp. 485– 526, Apr. 2025

  7. [7]

    F. Liu, C. Masouros, and Y . C. Eldar,Integrated Sensing and Commu- nications. Singapore: Springer, 2023

  8. [8]

    Recent advances of 6G ultra-massive MIMO technologies in spatial and beam domains,

    R. Feng, C.-X. Wang, J. Huang, and X. Gao, “Recent advances of 6G ultra-massive MIMO technologies in spatial and beam domains,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.10429, 2025

  9. [9]

    RIS-based IMT-2030 testbed for mmwave multi-stream ultra-massive MIMO communications,

    S. Zeng, B. Di, H. Zhang, J. Gao, S. Yue, X. Hu, R. Fu, J. Zhou, X. Liu, H. Zhang, Y . Wang, S. Sun, H. Qin, X. Su, M. Wang, and L. Song, “RIS-based IMT-2030 testbed for mmwave multi-stream ultra-massive MIMO communications,”IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 375–382, Jun. 2024

  10. [10]

    Integrated location sensing and communication for ultra-massive MIMO with hybrid-field beam-squint effect,

    Z. Gao, X. Zhou, B. Ning, Y . Su, T. Qin, and D. Niyato, “Integrated location sensing and communication for ultra-massive MIMO with hybrid-field beam-squint effect,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 1387–1404, Apr. 2025

  11. [11]

    Directivity-aware degrees of freedom analysis for extremely large-scale MIMO,

    S. Yue, L. Liu, and B. Di, “Directivity-aware degrees of freedom analysis for extremely large-scale MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 6, pp. 9950–9954, Jun. 2025

  12. [12]

    Holographic integrated sensing and communication,

    H. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, M. D. Renzo, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Holographic integrated sensing and communication,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 40, no. 7, pp. 2114–2130, Jul. 2022

  13. [13]

    Holographic integrated sens- ing and communications: Principles, technology, and implementation,

    H. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, and L. Song, “Holographic integrated sens- ing and communications: Principles, technology, and implementation,” IEEE Commun. Mag., vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 83–89, May 2023

  14. [14]

    Holographic beamforming with leakage power constraints,

    B. Di, S. Zhang, Z. Han, and R. Zhang, “Holographic beamforming with leakage power constraints,”IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 14–21, Aug. 2025

  15. [15]

    Reconfig- urable holographic surface-enabled multi-user wireless communica- tions: Amplitude-controlled holographic beamforming,

    R. Deng, B. Di, H. Zhang, Y . Tan, and L. Song, “Reconfig- urable holographic surface-enabled multi-user wireless communica- tions: Amplitude-controlled holographic beamforming,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 21, no. 8, pp. 6003–6017, Aug. 2022

  16. [16]

    Holographic antennas,

    P. Checcacci, V . Russo, and A. Scheggi, “Holographic antennas,”IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 811–813, Nov. 1970

  17. [17]

    Holographic antennas,

    ——, “Holographic antennas,”Proc. IEEE, vol. 56, no. 12, pp. 2165– 2167, Dec. 1968

  18. [18]

    Waveguide-fed tunable metamaterial element for dynamic apertures,

    T. Sleasman, M. F. Imani, W. Xu, J. Hunt, T. Driscoll, M. S. Reynolds, and D. R. Smith, “Waveguide-fed tunable metamaterial element for dynamic apertures,”IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., vol. 15, pp. 606–609, May 2016

  19. [19]

    Fluid antenna systems enabled by reconfigurable holographic surfaces: Beamforming design and experimental validation,

    S. Zhang, Y . Zhang, H. Hashida, Y . C. Eldar, M. D. Renzo, and B. Di, “Fluid antenna systems enabled by reconfigurable holographic surfaces: Beamforming design and experimental validation,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 44, pp. 1417–1431, Oct. 2025

  20. [20]

    Movable holographic surface antenna enabled ultra-massive MIMO,

    S. Zhang, B. Di, and L. Song, “Movable holographic surface antenna enabled ultra-massive MIMO,”IEEE Wirel. Comm. Mag., accepted 2025

  21. [21]

    Reconfigurable holographic surface: A new paradigm for ultra-massive MIMO,

    B. Di, H. Zhang, Z. Han, R. Zhang, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable holographic surface: A new paradigm for ultra-massive MIMO,”IEEE Trans. Cognitive Commun. Netw., vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 3761–3783, Mar. 2025

  22. [22]

    Integration of sensing, communication, and computing for metaverse: A survey,

    X. Wang, Q. Guo, Z. Ning, L. Guo, G. Wang, X. Gao, and Y . Zhang, “Integration of sensing, communication, and computing for metaverse: A survey,”ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 56, no. 10, pp. 1–38, May 2024

  23. [23]

    Advancements in ISAC: A review of multi-antenna technology integration for next-generation communication and sensing systems,

    Y . Ding, X. Li, Y . Cai, and Z. Wu, “Advancements in ISAC: A review of multi-antenna technology integration for next-generation communication and sensing systems,” inProc. 12th Int. Conf. Inf. Sys. Comput. Technol. (ISCTech), Xi’an, China, Nov. 2024

  24. [24]

    A tutorial on near-field XL-MIMO communications toward 6G,

    H. Lu, Y . Zeng, C. You, Y . Han, J. Zhang, Z. Wang, Z. Dong, S. Jin, C.-X. Wang, T. Jiang, X. You, and R. Zhang, “A tutorial on near-field XL-MIMO communications toward 6G,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 2213–2257, Oct. 2024

  25. [25]

    A tutorial on MIMO-OFDM ISAC: From far-field to near-field,

    Q. Dai, Y . Zeng, H. Wang, C. You, C. Zhou, H. Cheng, X. Xu, S. Jin, A. Lee Swindlehurst, Y . C. Eldar, R. Schober, R. Zhang, and X. You, “A tutorial on MIMO-OFDM ISAC: From far-field to near-field,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 28, pp. 4319–4358, Jan. 2026

  26. [26]

    A roadmap for NF- ISAC in 6G: A comprehensive overview and tutorial,

    A. Hakimi, D. Galappaththige, and C. Tellambura, “A roadmap for NF- ISAC in 6G: A comprehensive overview and tutorial,”Entropy, vol. 26, no. 9, p. 773, Sep. 2024

  27. [27]

    Near-field fading channel modeling for ELAAs: From communication to ISAC,

    J. Liu, Y . Ma, A. Elzanaty, and R. Tafazolli, “Near-field fading channel modeling for ELAAs: From communication to ISAC,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.17014, 2024

  28. [28]

    Cell-Free Integrated Sensing and Communication: Principles, Advances, and Future Directions

    D. Galappaththige, M. Mohammadi, G. A. Baduge, and C. Tellambura, “Cell-free integrated sensing and communication: Principles, advances, and future directions,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.20345, 2025

  29. [29]

    RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems for 6G: Fundamentals, system design, and applications,

    E. Shi, J. Zhang, H. Du, B. Ai, C. Yuen, D. Niyato, K. B. Letaief, and X. Shen, “RIS-aided cell-free massive MIMO systems for 6G: Fundamentals, system design, and applications,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 112, no. 4, pp. 331–364, Apr. 2024

  30. [30]

    Network-level ISAC design: State-of-the-art, challenges, and opportunities,

    K. Han, K. Meng, X.-Y . Wang, and C. Masouros, “Network-level ISAC design: State-of-the-art, challenges, and opportunities,”IEEE J. Sel. Top. Electromagn. Antennas Propag., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 65–83, Sep. 2025

  31. [31]

    The rise of networked ISAC: Emerging aspects and challenges,

    D. P. M. Osorio, B. Barua, K.-L. Besser, H. Blue, P. Dass, and P. Porambage, “The rise of networked ISAC: Emerging aspects and challenges,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Society, vol. 6, pp. 5072–5091, Jun. 2025

  32. [32]

    A survey on integrated sensing and communication with intelligent metasurfaces: Trends, challenges, and opportunities,

    A. Magbool, V . Kumar, Q. Wu, M. D. Renzo, and M. F. Flanagan, “A survey on integrated sensing and communication with intelligent metasurfaces: Trends, challenges, and opportunities,”IEEE Open J. Commun. Society, vol. 6, pp. 7270–7318, Aug. 2025

  33. [33]

    RIS-based physical layer security for integrated sensing and communication: A comprehensive survey,

    Y . Li, F. Khan, M. Ahmed, A. A. Soofi, W. U. Khan, C. K. Sheemar, M. Asif, and Z. Han, “RIS-based physical layer security for integrated sensing and communication: A comprehensive survey,”IEEE Int. Things J., vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 32 444–32 468, Aug. 2025

  34. [34]

    Enabling intelligent connectivity: A survey of secure ISAC in 6G networks,

    X. Zhu, J. Liu, L. Lu, T. Zhang, T. Qiu, C. Wang, and Y . Liu, “Enabling intelligent connectivity: A survey of secure ISAC in 6G networks,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 748–781, Apr. 2025

  35. [35]

    A state-of-the-art survey on IRS-NOMA for integrated sensing and communication,

    S. N. Sur, A. K. Singh, H. Q. Tran, P. Vishwakarma, A. L. Imoize, and C.-T. Li, “A state-of-the-art survey on IRS-NOMA for integrated sensing and communication,”IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 186 087– 186 123, Dec. 2024

  36. [36]

    RIS-assisted integrated sensing and com- munication: Applications, challenges and usecase scenario,

    G. Chopra and S. Ahmed, “RIS-assisted integrated sensing and com- munication: Applications, challenges and usecase scenario,”Discover Appl. Sci., vol. 7, no. 7, p. 650, Jun. 2025

  37. [37]

    The emergence of multi-functional and hybrid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for integrated sensing and communications - a survey,

    A. Tishchenko, M. Khalily, A. Shojaeifard, F. Burton, E. Bj ¨ornson, M. D. Renzo, and R. Tafazolli, “The emergence of multi-functional and hybrid reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for integrated sensing and communications - a survey,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 2895–2936, Jan. 2025

  38. [38]

    F. L. Pedrotti, L. M. Pedrotti, and L. S. Pedrotti,Introduction to Optics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2017

  39. [39]

    Some remarks on radio-frequency holography,

    G. Deschamps, “Some remarks on radio-frequency holography,”Pro- ceedings of the IEEE, vol. 55, no. 4, pp. 570–571, Apr. 1967

  40. [40]

    Holo- graphic antenna concept, analysis, and parameters,

    M. ElSherbiny, A. Fathy, A. Rosen, G. Ayers, and S. Perlow, “Holo- graphic antenna concept, analysis, and parameters,”IEEE Trans. An- tennas Propag., vol. 52, no. 3, pp. 830–839, Mar. 2004

  41. [41]

    Leaky-wave based interpre- tation of the radiation from holographic surfaces,

    M. Nannetti, F. Caminita, and S. Maci, “Leaky-wave based interpre- tation of the radiation from holographic surfaces,” inIEEE AP-S Int. Symp., Honolulu, HI, Jun. 2007

  42. [42]

    Leaky wave antennas for next generation wireless applications in sub-THz frequencies: Current status and research challenges,

    N. Lang, A. K. Kludze, N. Shlezinger, Y . Ghasempour, T. Routtenberg, G. C. Alexandropoulos, and Y . C. Eldar, “Leaky wave antennas for next generation wireless applications in sub-THz frequencies: Current status and research challenges,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2510.11666, 2025

  43. [43]

    Dynamic metasurface antennas for 6G extreme massive MIMO communications,

    N. Shlezinger, G. C. Alexandropoulos, M. F. Imani, Y . C. Eldar, and D. R. Smith, “Dynamic metasurface antennas for 6G extreme massive MIMO communications,”IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 106–113, Apr. 2021

  44. [44]

    Target detection and positioning aided by reconfigurable surfaces: Reflective or holographic?

    X. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Liu, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and B. Di, “Target detection and positioning aided by reconfigurable surfaces: Reflective or holographic?”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 23, no. 12, pp. 19 215–19 230, Dec. 2024

  45. [45]

    Reconfigurable holographic metasurface aided wideband OFDM communications against beam squint,

    B. Di, “Reconfigurable holographic metasurface aided wideband OFDM communications against beam squint,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Tech- nol., vol. 70, no. 5, pp. 5099–5103, May 2021. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COMMUNICATIONS, VOL. 14, NO. 8, AUGUST 2025 36

  46. [46]

    Analysis of a waveguide-fed metasurface antenna,

    D. R. Smith, O. Yurduseven, L. P. Mancera, P. Bowen, and N. B. Kundtz, “Analysis of a waveguide-fed metasurface antenna,”Phys. Rev. Appl., vol. 8, no. 5, p. 054048, Nov. 2017

  47. [47]

    Reconfigurable holographic surface enabled ultra-massive MIMO: How large surface is enough?

    X. Hu, B. Di, J. Wang, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable holographic surface enabled ultra-massive MIMO: How large surface is enough?” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 2348–2362, Dec. 2025

  48. [48]

    Reconfigurable holographic surface-assisted radio simultaneous localization and map- ping (SLAM) with leakage power constraints,

    Z. Yang, X. Liu, H. Zhang, B. Di, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable holographic surface-assisted radio simultaneous localization and map- ping (SLAM) with leakage power constraints,”IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 74, pp. 4415–4430, Jan. 2026

  49. [49]

    Large-scale intelligent surfaces enabled unified near-field and far-field communications: Codebook design and beam training,

    S. Zhang, Y . Zhang, and B. Di, “Large-scale intelligent surfaces enabled unified near-field and far-field communications: Codebook design and beam training,”IEEE Network, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 90–96, Jan. 2025

  50. [50]

    Intelligent omni- surfaces aided wireless communications: Does the reciprocity hold?

    S. Yue, S. Zeng, H. Zhang, F. Lin, L. Liu, and B. Di, “Intelligent omni- surfaces aided wireless communications: Does the reciprocity hold?” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 6, pp. 8181–8185, Jun. 2023

  51. [51]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in 6G: Reflective, transmissive, or both?

    S. Zeng, H. Zhang, B. Di, Y . Tan, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in 6G: Reflective, transmissive, or both?”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 2063–2067, Jun. 2021

  52. [52]

    UA V relaying: Power alloca- tion and trajectory optimization using decode-and-forward protocol,

    S. Zeng, H. Zhang, K. Bian, and L. Song, “UA V relaying: Power alloca- tion and trajectory optimization using decode-and-forward protocol,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Commun. Workshops (ICC Workshops), Kansas City, MO, 2018

  53. [53]

    Intelligent omni-surfaces: Reflection-refraction circuit model, full-dimensional beamforming, and system implementation,

    S. Zeng, H. Zhang, B. Di, Y . Liu, M. D. Renzo, Z. Han, H. V . Poor, and L. Song, “Intelligent omni-surfaces: Reflection-refraction circuit model, full-dimensional beamforming, and system implementation,” IEEE Trans. Commun., vol. 70, no. 11, pp. 7711–7727, Nov. 2022

  54. [54]

    Reconfigurable refractive surfaces: An energy-efficient way to holographic MIMO,

    S. Zeng, H. Zhang, B. Di, H. Qin, X. Su, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable refractive surfaces: An energy-efficient way to holographic MIMO,” IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 26, no. 10, pp. 2490–2494, Oct. 2022

  55. [55]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and opportunities,

    Y . Liu, X. Liu, X. Mu, T. Hou, J. Xu, M. Di Renzo, and N. Al-Dhahir, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Principles and opportunities,” IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 1546–1577, May 2021

  56. [56]

    Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) assisted wireless coverage extension: RIS orientation and location optimization,

    S. Zeng, H. Zhang, B. Di, Z. Han, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) assisted wireless coverage extension: RIS orientation and location optimization,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 269–273, Jan. 2021

  57. [57]

    Wireless communications with reconfigurable intelligent surface: Path loss modeling and exper- imental measurement,

    W. Tang, M. Z. Chen, X. Chen, J. Y . Dai, Y . Han, M. Di Renzo, Y . Zeng, S. Jin, Q. Cheng, and T. J. Cui, “Wireless communications with reconfigurable intelligent surface: Path loss modeling and exper- imental measurement,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 421–439, Jan. 2021

  58. [58]

    Integrated sensing and communication with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Opportunities, applications, and future directions,

    R. Liu, M. Li, H. Luo, Q. Liu, and A. L. Swindlehurst, “Integrated sensing and communication with reconfigurable intelligent surfaces: Opportunities, applications, and future directions,”IEEE Wirel. Com- mun., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 50–57, Feb. 2023

  59. [59]

    SNR/CRB- constrained joint beamforming and reflection designs for RIS-ISAC systems,

    R. Liu, M. Li, Q. Liu, and A. Lee Swindlehurst, “SNR/CRB- constrained joint beamforming and reflection designs for RIS-ISAC systems,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 23, no. 7, pp. 7456–7470, Jul. 2024

  60. [60]

    Horus: Enhancing safe corners via integrated sensing and communication enabled by reconfigurable in- telligent surface,

    Q. Luo, J. Gao, and B. Di, “Horus: Enhancing safe corners via integrated sensing and communication enabled by reconfigurable in- telligent surface,” inProc. Annual Int. Conf. Mob. Comput. Netw., Washington D.C., 2024

  61. [61]

    A survey on integrated sensing, communication, and computation,

    D. Wen, Y . Zhou, X. Li, Y . Shi, K. Huang, and K. B. Letaief, “A survey on integrated sensing, communication, and computation,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 3058–3098, Oct. 2025

  62. [62]

    Stochastic geometry for modeling and analysis of sensing and communications: A survey,

    H. K. Armeniakos, P. S. Bithas, S. A. Tegos, A. G. Kanatas, and G. K. Karagiannidis, “Stochastic geometry for modeling and analysis of sensing and communications: A survey,”IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor., vol. 28, pp. 2691–2724, Jul. 2025

  63. [63]

    An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,

    J. A. Zhang, F. Liu, C. Masouros, R. W. Heath, Z. Feng, L. Zheng, and A. Petropulu, “An overview of signal processing techniques for joint communication and radar sensing,”IEEE J. Sel. Topics Signal Process., vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1295–1315, Nov. 2021

  64. [64]

    Location-aware communication for RIS-aided distributed MIMO systems,

    Z. Yang, H. Zhang, B. Di, X. Li, X. Hou, and L. Song, “Location-aware communication for RIS-aided distributed MIMO systems,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 74, no. 3, pp. 4445–4460, Mar. 2025

  65. [65]

    Localization-assisted communication for RIS-aided distributed MIMO systems using distributionally robust optimization,

    Z. Yang, S. Yang, H. Zhang, B. Di, X. Li, X. Hou, and L. Song, “Localization-assisted communication for RIS-aided distributed MIMO systems using distributionally robust optimization,” inProc. IEEE/CIC Int. Conf. Commun. China (ICCC), Hangzhou, China, Aug. 2024

  66. [66]

    Trends, challenges, and key technologies of beam-space multiplexing based on metasurfaces,

    S. Chen, S. Sun, X. Su, X. Zhang, Q. Gao, H. Niu, W. Sun, S. Zeng, R. Deng, Y . Zhang, H. Zhang, X. Hu, B. Di, and L. Song, “Trends, challenges, and key technologies of beam-space multiplexing based on metasurfaces,”IEEE Wirel. Commun., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 130–138, Jun. 2025

  67. [67]

    Cooperative sensing for 6G mobile cellular networks: Feasibility, performance, and field trial,

    G. Liu, R. Xi, Z. Han, L. Han, X. Zhang, L. Ma, Y . Wang, M. Lou, J. Jin, Q. Wang, and J. Wang, “Cooperative sensing for 6G mobile cellular networks: Feasibility, performance, and field trial,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 2863–2876, Oct. 2024

  68. [68]

    Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,

    ITU-R, “Framework and overall objectives of the future development of IMT for 2030 and beyond,” International Telecommunication Union (ITU), Tech. Rep. Recommendation ITU-R M.2160-0, 2023

  69. [69]

    Dual-polarized reconfigurable intelligent surface-based antenna for holographic MIMO communications,

    S. Zeng, H. Zhang, B. Di, Z. Han, and H. Vincent Poor, “Dual-polarized reconfigurable intelligent surface-based antenna for holographic MIMO communications,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 23, no. 11, pp. 17 339–17 353, Nov. 2024

  70. [70]

    Reconfigurable refractive surface-enabled multi-user holographic MIMO communications,

    S. Zeng, H. Zhang, B. Di, and L. Song, “Reconfigurable refractive surface-enabled multi-user holographic MIMO communications,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 4845–4860, May 2024

  71. [71]

    Near- far field channel modeling for holographic mimo using expectation- maximization methods,

    H. Chen, S. Zeng, H. Guo, T. Svensson, and H. Zhang, “Near- far field channel modeling for holographic mimo using expectation- maximization methods,” inProc. IEEE Wirel. Commun. Netw. Conf. (WCNC), Dubai, UAE, Apr. 2024

  72. [72]

    Metalocalization: Reconfigurable intelligent surface aided multi-user wireless indoor localization,

    H. Zhang, H. Zhang, D. Boya, K. Bian, Z. Han, and L. Song, “Metalocalization: Reconfigurable intelligent surface aided multi-user wireless indoor localization,”IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun., vol. 20, no. 12, pp. 7743–7757, Dec. 2021

  73. [73]

    Holographic radar: Target detection enabled by reconfigurable holographic surfaces,

    X. Zhang, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, and B. Di, “Holographic radar: Target detection enabled by reconfigurable holographic surfaces,”IEEE Commun. Lett., vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 332–336, Jan. 2023

  74. [74]

    MetaSLAM: Wireless simultaneous localization and mapping using reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,

    Z. Yang, H. Zhang, H. Zhang, B. Di, M. Dong, L. Yang, and L. Song, “MetaSLAM: Wireless simultaneous localization and mapping using reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,”IEEE Trans. Wireless Commun., vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 2606–2620, Apr. 2023

  75. [75]

    Wireless indoor simultaneous localization and mapping using reconfigurable intelligent surface,

    Z. Yang, H. Zhang, B. Di, H. Zhang, K. Bian, and L. Song, “Wireless indoor simultaneous localization and mapping using reconfigurable intelligent surface,” inProc. IEEE Global Commun. Conf. (GLOBE- COM), Madrid, Spain, Dec. 2021

  76. [76]

    Rethinking estimation rate for wireless sensing: A rate-distortion perspective,

    F. Dong, F. Liu, S. Lu, and Y . Xiong, “Rethinking estimation rate for wireless sensing: A rate-distortion perspective,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 12, pp. 16 876–16 881, Dec. 2023

  77. [77]

    On probing signal design for MIMO radar,

    P. Stoica, J. Li, and Y . Xie, “On probing signal design for MIMO radar,”IEEE Trans. Signal Process., vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 4151–4161, Jul. 2007

  78. [78]

    Joint design of receiving filters and complementary set of sequences for ISAC with sidelobe level suppression,

    K. Zhang, J. Wu, F. Dong, S. Lu, X. Li, and W. Yuan, “Joint design of receiving filters and complementary set of sequences for ISAC with sidelobe level suppression,”IEEE J. Sel. Areas Sensors, vol. 1, pp. 211–223, Sep. 2024

  79. [79]

    Optimal transmit beamforming for integrated sensing and communication,

    H. Hua, J. Xu, and T. X. Han, “Optimal transmit beamforming for integrated sensing and communication,”IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 72, no. 8, pp. 10 588–10 603, Aug. 2023

  80. [80]

    A survey of collocated MIMO radar,

    H. Zishu, C. Ziyang, L. Jun, Z. Wei, S. Jingxi, S. Yang, and D. Ming- long, “A survey of collocated MIMO radar,”J. Radars, vol. 11, no. 5, pp. 805–829, Aug. 2022

Showing first 80 references.