arxiv: 2605.10323 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-11 · 💻 cs.IR

Recognition: no theorem link

Every Preference Has Its Strength: Injecting Ordinal Semantics into LLM-Based Recommenders

Jiwon Jeong , Donghee Han , Sungrae Hong , Woosung Kang , Mun Yong Yi

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-12 03:04 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.IR

keywords recommender systemslarge language modelsordinal preferencescollaborative filteringsemantic anchoringpreference modeling

0 comments

The pith

Representing each rating level as a distinct numeric token lets LLM recommenders keep the strength of user preferences instead of collapsing them to binary signals.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Current LLM-based recommenders often convert explicit ratings into simple positive or negative feedback, which erases information about how much a user likes one item more than another. The paper shows this loss hurts the model's ability to make nuanced distinctions. Ordinal Semantic Anchoring treats each preference level as its own numeric word token whose embedding acts as a fixed point in the model's space. User-item interaction vectors are then pulled toward the matching anchor so the original strength information survives the fusion with collaborative signals. Experiments indicate this produces better results than prior hybrid methods, especially when the task requires comparing pairs of items.

Core claim

By representing ordinal preference levels as numeric textual tokens and aligning interaction representations to their embeddings, Ordinal Semantic Anchoring preserves preference strength semantics inside the LLM latent space when collaborative filtering signals are injected.

What carries the argument

Ordinal Semantic Anchoring, which converts rating levels into numeric tokens and uses their embeddings as alignment targets for user-item representations.

If this is right

Recommendations can distinguish weak from strong preferences rather than treating all positive feedback as equal.
Pairwise ranking tasks improve because the model retains fine differences between rating levels.
Hybrid CF-LLM systems no longer need to discard ordinal data to stay compatible with language model inputs.
The same token-anchoring pattern can be applied to any user feedback that comes in ordered categories.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The technique could be tested on non-recommendation ordinal tasks such as review sentiment or risk assessment where graded labels exist.
If the anchors work reliably, future systems might embed other numeric scales, like price tiers or time durations, in the same way.
Success here suggests that LLMs can be guided to respect ordered categories without full retraining by choosing the right token references.

Load-bearing premise

Mapping rating numbers directly to text tokens and pulling interaction vectors toward those token embeddings will carry preference strength information across without creating new distortions.

What would settle it

On a dataset with known graded ratings, if the method shows no gain in pairwise preference accuracy over a baseline that ignores ordinal levels, the alignment step has failed to transmit strength semantics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.10323 by Donghee Han, Jiwon Jeong, Mun Yong Yi, Sungrae Hong, Woosung Kang.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Overview of Ordinal Semantic Anchoring (OSA). [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Prompt template for OSA. implemented as a two-layer MLP with GELU. For each interaction representation z𝑢,𝑖, we obtain a projected vector v𝑢,𝑖 = 𝑓proj(z𝑢,𝑖), which is used as an input to the LLM. We adopt a pretrained LLM and fine-tune it with LoRA [10] to adapt the model to the recommendation task. Following the template in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Visualization of interaction representations before [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Recent work has shown that large language models (LLMs) can enhance recommender systems by integrating collaborative filtering (CF) signals through hybrid prompting. However, most existing CF-LLM frameworks collapse explicit ratings into implicit or positive-only feedback, discarding the ordinal structure that conveys fine-grained preference strength. As a result, these models struggle to exploit graded semantics and nuanced preference distinctions. We propose Ordinal Semantic Anchoring (OSA), a hybrid CF-LLM framework that explicitly incorporates preference strength by modeling interaction-level user feedback. OSA represents ordinal preference levels as numeric textual tokens and uses their token embeddings as semantic anchors to align user-item interaction representations in the LLM latent space. Through strength-aware alignment across ordinal levels, OSA preserves preference semantics when integrating collaborative signals with LLMs. Experiments on multiple real-world datasets demonstrate that OSA consistently outperforms existing baselines, particularly in pairwise preference evaluation, highlighting its effectiveness in modeling fine-grained user preferences over prior CF-LLM methods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

OSA anchors user-item vectors to numeric rating token embeddings to keep preference strength, but the gains may not come from ordinal semantics since LLM digit embeddings lack guaranteed order.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper adds a concrete step to hybrid LLM recommenders: it maps explicit ratings to tokens like '1' or '5' and aligns interaction representations to those embeddings so the model sees graded preference strength instead of just positive signals. That addresses a clear gap in earlier CF-LLM work that usually collapses ratings to implicit feedback. The method is straightforward and the reported pairwise improvements on several datasets suggest it can help in practice where intensity matters for ranking or decisions. The experiments focus on real-world data and emphasize fine-grained preference metrics, which is the right place to look. The framework itself is described clearly enough that someone could reimplement the alignment loss on top of an existing LLM recommender pipeline. The soft spot is the missing check on whether the token embeddings actually carry usable ordinal structure. LLM embeddings for isolated digits are shaped by token frequency and surrounding text, not numerical order, so the alignment could succeed for reasons unrelated to strength semantics. An ablation that swaps in random or shuffled anchors would show if the ordinal part is doing the work or if any extra trainable projection would produce similar gains. Without that or embedding-space diagnostics, the central claim rests on the assumption rather than direct evidence. This is aimed at researchers already building or tuning LLM-based recommenders who want to retain rating scale information. It has a focused, implementable idea plus empirical claims, so it is worth sending to peer review. Reviewers will probably ask for the ablations and more detail on baselines and significance, but the work is coherent enough to benefit from that process.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes Ordinal Semantic Anchoring (OSA), a hybrid collaborative filtering (CF) and LLM framework that represents explicit ordinal ratings as numeric textual tokens (e.g., '1', '2', '5') and aligns user-item interaction representations to the corresponding token embeddings in the LLM latent space via a strength-aware alignment loss. This is intended to preserve fine-grained preference strength semantics that prior CF-LLM methods discard by collapsing ratings to implicit feedback. The central empirical claim is that OSA consistently outperforms existing baselines across multiple real-world datasets, with particular gains on pairwise preference evaluation metrics.

Significance. If the claimed outperformance is robust and the alignment mechanism demonstrably exploits ordinal structure rather than generic prompting effects, the work would provide a concrete, reproducible way to inject graded preference information into LLM-based recommenders. This addresses a clear limitation in current hybrid CF-LLM pipelines and could improve ranking quality in rating-rich domains.

major comments (2)

[§3.2] §3.2 (Alignment Objective): The claim that aligning to numeric token embeddings transmits usable ordinal strength information rests on an unverified assumption. Standard LLM token embeddings for isolated digits frequently lack monotonic structure (distances reflect co-occurrence or frequency rather than numerical order). No embedding-space diagnostics (e.g., cosine distances or ordering tests between '1'/'2'/'5' embeddings) or ablation (numeric anchors vs. random/shuffled anchors) are reported to show that the alignment loss actually exploits ordinality rather than simply adding a trainable projection.
[§4.2–4.3] §4.2–4.3 (Experimental Results): The abstract and results sections assert consistent outperformance “particularly in pairwise preference evaluation,” yet the provided evidence lacks quantitative tables with exact metrics, baseline configurations, statistical significance tests, or ablation studies isolating the ordinal component. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether gains derive from the proposed semantic anchoring or from other factors such as additional parameters or prompting differences.

minor comments (2)

[Eq. (3)] Notation for the alignment loss (Eq. 3) uses an undefined temperature parameter τ; clarify its value and whether it is tuned or fixed.
[Figure 2] Figure 2 caption does not specify the exact datasets or number of runs used for the reported curves; add this information for reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive feedback on our work introducing Ordinal Semantic Anchoring (OSA). We address each major comment below with clarifications and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3.2] The claim that aligning to numeric token embeddings transmits usable ordinal strength information rests on an unverified assumption. Standard LLM token embeddings for isolated digits frequently lack monotonic structure (distances reflect co-occurrence or frequency rather than numerical order). No embedding-space diagnostics (e.g., cosine distances or ordering tests between '1'/'2'/'5' embeddings) or ablation (numeric anchors vs. random/shuffled anchors) are reported to show that the alignment loss actually exploits ordinality rather than simply adding a trainable projection.

Authors: We agree that direct verification of ordinal structure in the token embeddings would strengthen the argument. The manuscript formulates the strength-aware alignment loss to explicitly map user-item representations to the numeric token embeddings corresponding to rating levels, but does not include embedding diagnostics or ablations against shuffled/random anchors. In the revised version we will add cosine similarity analyses among the embeddings of '1', '2', '3', '4', '5' and an ablation replacing numeric anchors with shuffled or random tokens, thereby isolating whether the alignment exploits ordinal semantics. revision: yes
Referee: [§4.2–4.3] The abstract and results sections assert consistent outperformance “particularly in pairwise preference evaluation,” yet the provided evidence lacks quantitative tables with exact metrics, baseline configurations, statistical significance tests, or ablation studies isolating the ordinal component. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether gains derive from the proposed semantic anchoring or from other factors such as additional parameters or prompting differences.

Authors: We acknowledge that the experimental reporting can be made more transparent. While the manuscript reports consistent outperformance on pairwise preference metrics across datasets, it does not present exhaustive numerical tables, full baseline hyper-parameter settings, statistical significance tests, or component ablations in the main text. In the revision we will expand Sections 4.2–4.3 with complete metric tables, baseline configurations, paired statistical tests, and ablations that isolate the ordinal anchoring loss from other modeling choices. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical method with external validation

full rationale

The paper proposes OSA as a hybrid CF-LLM framework that aligns interaction representations to numeric token embeddings for ordinal levels, then validates the approach via experiments on multiple real-world datasets showing outperformance over baselines. No derivation chain, equations, or self-citations reduce any claimed result to an input parameter or prior author work by construction. The central mechanism is a modeling choice justified by empirical results rather than self-definition or fitted quantities renamed as predictions. The reader's assessment of score 2.0 is consistent with minor self-citation potential at most, but the provided text exhibits none that is load-bearing.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available; the ledger is therefore limited to elements inferable from the high-level description. The method introduces one new conceptual entity (semantic anchors) whose effectiveness is asserted but not independently verified outside the reported experiments.

axioms (1)

domain assumption LLM token embeddings of numeric rating strings can serve as stable semantic anchors for preference strength
Invoked when the paper states that these embeddings are used to align interaction representations

invented entities (1)

Ordinal Semantic Anchors no independent evidence
purpose: Fixed reference points in latent space that encode preference strength levels
New construct introduced to preserve ordinal semantics; no external falsifiable prediction (e.g., predicted embedding geometry) is stated in the abstract

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5473 in / 1291 out tokens · 53784 ms · 2026-05-12T03:04:13.803605+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

28 extracted references · 28 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

Keqin Bao, Jizhi Zhang, Xinyu Lin, Yang Zhang, Wenjie Wang, and Fuli Feng

work page
[2]

InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Large language models for recommendation: Past, present, and future. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2993–2996

work page
[3]

Keqin Bao, Jizhi Zhang, Yang Zhang, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He. 2023. Tallrec: An effective and efficient tuning framework to align large language model with recommendation. InProceedings of the 17th ACM conference on recommender systems. 1007–1014

work page 2023
[4]

Jinpeng Chen, Jianxiang He, Huan Li, Senzhang Wang, Yuan Cao, Kaimin Wei, Zhenye Yang, and Ye Ji. 2025. Hierarchical intent-guided optimization with plug- gable LLM-driven semantics for session-based recommendation. InProceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1655–1665

work page 2025
[5]

Junze Chen, Xinjie Yang, Cheng Yang, Junfei Bao, Zeyuan Guo, Yawen Li, and Chuan Shi. 2025. Corona: A coarse-to-fine framework for graph-based recom- mendation with large language models. InProceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2048–2058

work page 2025
[6]

Yu Cui, Feng Liu, Pengbo Wang, Bohao Wang, Heng Tang, Yi Wan, Jun Wang, and Jiawei Chen. 2024. Distillation Matters: Empowering Sequential Recommenders to Match the Performance of Large Language Models. InProceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Recommender Systems(Bari, Italy)(RecSys ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 507–517....

work page doi:10.1145/3640457 2024
[7]

F Maxwell Harper and Joseph A Konstan. 2015. The movielens datasets: History and context.Acm transactions on interactive intelligent systems (tiis)5, 4 (2015), 1–19

work page 2015
[8]

Ruining He and Julian McAuley. 2016. Fusing similarity models with markov chains for sparse sequential recommendation. In2016 IEEE 16th international conference on data mining (ICDM). IEEE, 191–200

work page 2016
[9]

Balázs Hidasi, Alexandros Karatzoglou, Linas Baltrunas, and Domonkos Tikk

work page
[10]

Session-based recommendations with recurrent neural networks.arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.06939(2015)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015
[11]

Yupeng Hou, Junjie Zhang, Zihan Lin, Hongyu Lu, Ruobing Xie, Julian McAuley, and Wayne Xin Zhao. 2024. Large language models are zero-shot rankers for recommender systems. InEuropean Conference on Information Retrieval. Springer, 364–381

work page 2024
[12]

Edward J Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu, Yuanzhi Li, Shean Wang, Lu Wang, Weizhu Chen, et al. 2022. Lora: Low-rank adaptation of large language models.ICLR1, 2 (2022), 3

work page 2022
[13]

Wang-Cheng Kang and Julian McAuley. 2018. Self-Attentive Sequential Rec- ommendation. In2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). 197–206. doi:10.1109/ICDM.2018.00035

work page doi:10.1109/icdm.2018.00035 2018
[14]

Sein Kim, Hongseok Kang, Seungyoon Choi, Donghyun Kim, Minchul Yang, and Chanyoung Park. 2024. Large language models meet collaborative filtering: An efficient all-round llm-based recommender system. InProceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 1395–1406

work page 2024
[15]

Xiaoyu Kong, Jiancan Wu, An Zhang, Leheng Sheng, Hui Lin, Xiang Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2024. Customizing language models with instance-wise lora for sequential recommendation.Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 37 (2024), 113072–113095

work page 2024
[16]

Jiayi Liao, Sihang Li, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu, Yancheng Yuan, Xiang Wang, and Xiangnan He. 2024. LLaRA: Large Language-Recommendation Assis- tant. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Re- search and Development in Information Retrieval(Washington DC, USA)(SIGIR ’24). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1785...

work page doi:10.1145/3626772.3657690 2024
[17]

Yuting Liu, Jinghao Zhang, Yizhou Dang, Yuliang Liang, Qiang Liu, Guibing Guo, Jianzhe Zhao, and Xingwei Wang. 2025. Cora: Collaborative information perception by large language model’s weights for recommendation. InProceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 39. 12246–12254

work page 2025
[18]

Jianmo Ni, Jiacheng Li, and Julian McAuley. 2019. Justifying recommendations using distantly-labeled reviews and fine-grained aspects. InProceedings of the 2019 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing and the 9th international joint conference on natural language processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 188–197

work page 2019
[19]

Jiaxi Tang and Ke Wang. 2018. Personalized top-n sequential recommenda- tion via convolutional sequence embedding. InProceedings of the eleventh ACM international conference on web search and data mining. 565–573

work page 2018
[20]

Paul Thomas, Seth Spielman, Nick Craswell, and Bhaskar Mitra. 2024. Large language models can accurately predict searcher preferences. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1930–1940

work page 2024
[21]

Ke Wang, Ji Zhang, and Kuan Liu. 2025. Enhancing cross-domain recommen- dation with plug-in contrastive representations from large language models. InProceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 1799–1809

work page 2025
[22]

Xiaopeng Ye, Chen Xu, Zhongxiang Sun, Jun Xu, Gang Wang, Zhenhua Dong, and Ji-Rong Wen. 2025. Llm-empowered creator simulation for long-term evaluation of recommender systems under information asymmetry. InProceedings of the 48th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 201–211

work page 2025
[23]

Zhenrui Yue, Huimin Zeng, Yueqi Wang, Julian McAuley, and Dong Wang. 2025. Preference-Optimized Retrieval and Ranking for Efficient Multimodal Recom- mendation. InProceedings of the 31st ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining V. 2. 3692–3703

work page 2025
[24]

Yang Zhang, Keqin Bao, Ming Yan, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, and Xiangnan He

work page
[25]

Text-like encoding of collaborative information in large language models for recommendation.arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.03210(2024)

work page arXiv 2024
[26]

Yang Zhang, Fuli Feng, Jizhi Zhang, Keqin Bao, Qifan Wang, and Xiangnan He

work page
[27]

Collm: Integrating collaborative embeddings into large language models for recommendation.IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering(2025)

work page 2025
[28]

Shengyao Zhuang, Honglei Zhuang, Bevan Koopman, and Guido Zuccon. 2024. A setwise approach for effective and highly efficient zero-shot ranking with large language models. InProceedings of the 47th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 38–47

work page 2024