pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.12848 · v2 · pith:GWOEOWVRnew · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

Dispersion Engineered Frequency Tunable Delay Platform based on Magnetostatic Surface Waves

Chin-Yu Chang , Xingyu Du , Shun Yao , Tao Wang , Shuxian Wu , Roy H. Olsson III This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 14:24 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph
keywords magnetostatic surface wavesyttrium iron garnettunable delay linesdispersion engineeringnonreciprocal isolationYIG waveguidesreconfigurable RFgroup delay
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetostatic surface waves in microfabricated YIG waveguides enable continuously tunable microwave delays from 6 to 19.6 GHz with group delays of 3.3 to 42.8 ns.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates a microwave delay platform based on magnetostatic surface waves in 18 micrometer thick yttrium iron garnet waveguides. By co-engineering the spin-wave dispersion with the radiation impedance of meander-line transducers, it achieves continuous frequency tuning from 6 to 19.6 GHz under magnetic bias while producing group delays from 3.3 to 42.8 nanoseconds. The devices deliver insertion losses of 2.5 to 10.1 decibels and nonreciprocal isolation of 24 to 39 decibels, all measured directly into 50 ohm ports without external matching. Length-resolved characterization yields unit-time propagation losses of 56 to 109 dB per microsecond and propagation quality factors that rise from 3002 to 4893, exceeding those of fixed-frequency acoustic delay lines at every benchmarked frequency. Such performance addresses the simultaneous requirements for low loss, compactness, low noise, and wideband frequency agility in reconfigurable radio-frequency front ends for radar and wireless systems.

Core claim

Microfabricated 18 micrometer YIG waveguides supporting magnetostatic surface waves, when the spin-wave dispersion is co-engineered with the radiation impedance of meander-line transducers, grant pitch-controlled access to distinct dispersive or near-constant group-delay regimes and enable continuous tuning from 6 to 19.6 GHz under magnetic bias, delivering group delays of 3.3 to 42.8 ns at insertion losses of 2.5 to 10.1 dB and nonreciprocal isolation of 24 to 39 dB measured directly into 50 ohm systems, with propagation Q-factors rising monotonically from 3002 to 4893 and exceeding state-of-the-art fixed-frequency acoustic delay lines.

What carries the argument

Co-engineering of spin wave dispersion with meander-line transducer radiation impedance, which grants pitch-controlled access to dispersive or near-constant group-delay regimes.

Load-bearing premise

Fabrication variations in the 18 micrometer YIG waveguides and meander-line transducer patterns do not introduce unmodeled scattering, damping, or impedance mismatches that degrade the modeled dispersion and radiation impedance matching.

What would settle it

Direct S-parameter measurements on fabricated devices across several magnetic bias fields from 6 to 19.6 GHz that show group delays outside the 3.3-42.8 ns range or insertion losses above 10.1 dB without external matching networks.

read the original abstract

Reconfigurable radio-frequency front ends in modern radar and wireless systems require delay elements that simultaneously offer low-loss, low noise, compact form factor, and wideband frequency agility. However, electromagnetic, acoustic, photonic, and active-circuit delay technologies each fail to deliver this combination. Here we report a microwave delay platform based on magnetostatic surface waves (MSSWs) in microfabricated 18 $\mu$m yttrium iron garnet (YIG) waveguides, in which co-engineering the spin wave dispersion with the radiation impedance of meander-line transducers grants pitch-controlled access to distinct dispersive or near-constant group-delay regimes. Tuned continuously from 6 to 19.6 GHz under magnetic bias, the delay lines deliver group delays of 3.3 to 42.8 ns at insertion losses of 2.5 to 10.1 dB and nonreciprocal isolation of 24 to 39 dB, all measured directly into 50 $\Omega$ without external impedance matching. Length-resolved characterization yields unit-time propagation losses of 56 to 109 dB/$\mu$s and propagation Q-factors that rise monotonically from 3002 to 4893 across the operating range, exceeding state-of-the-art fixed frequency acoustic delay lines at every benchmarked frequency. These results establish microfabricated YIG as a versatile, low-loss microwave platform for next-generation reconfigurable RF signal processing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental microwave delay platform using magnetostatic surface waves (MSSWs) in microfabricated 18 μm YIG waveguides. Co-engineering of spin-wave dispersion with meander-line transducer radiation impedance enables pitch-controlled access to dispersive or near-constant group-delay regimes. Continuous tuning from 6 to 19.6 GHz yields measured group delays of 3.3–42.8 ns, insertion losses of 2.5–10.1 dB, and nonreciprocal isolation of 24–39 dB into 50 Ω. Length-resolved characterization extracts unit-time propagation losses of 56–109 dB/μs and propagation Q-factors rising monotonically from 3002 to 4893, claimed to exceed state-of-the-art fixed-frequency acoustic delay lines at every benchmarked frequency.

Significance. If the reported metrics are reproducible, the platform would provide a compact, low-loss, frequency-agile alternative to existing delay technologies for reconfigurable RF front-ends in radar and wireless systems. The combination of wideband tunability, direct 50 Ω matching, and nonreciprocity, together with Q-factors that improve with frequency, represents a potentially useful addition to the microwave signal-processing toolkit.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section on length-resolved characterization: the headline metrics (group delays 3.3–42.8 ns, propagation losses 56–109 dB/μs, Q-factors 3002–4893, isolation 24–39 dB) are presented as point values without error bars, device statistics, or raw S-parameter traces. Because the superiority claim over acoustic lines rests directly on these numbers, the absence of uncertainty quantification is load-bearing for the central experimental claim.
  2. [Abstract] Abstract: the extraction of unit-time propagation loss after subtracting transducer contributions assumes that meander-line radiation impedance remains matched to the MSSW dispersion across the entire 6–19.6 GHz bias sweep and that 18 μm YIG film thickness/edge variations are negligible. No independent transducer S-parameter data or film-uniformity maps are referenced to validate this subtraction procedure.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the phrase 'exceeding state-of-the-art fixed frequency acoustic delay lines at every benchmarked frequency' would be strengthened by an explicit table or figure that lists the specific acoustic references and their Q or loss values at each frequency point.
  2. [Methods] The manuscript would benefit from a brief methods paragraph specifying YIG growth technique, substrate, and lithographic tolerances for the 18 μm waveguides and meander patterns to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed review, as well as the positive assessment of the platform's potential significance. We have carefully considered the concerns regarding experimental presentation and validation of the loss-extraction procedure. Below we respond point by point and indicate where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Results] Abstract and Results section on length-resolved characterization: the headline metrics (group delays 3.3–42.8 ns, propagation losses 56–109 dB/μs, Q-factors 3002–4893, isolation 24–39 dB) are presented as point values without error bars, device statistics, or raw S-parameter traces. Because the superiority claim over acoustic lines rests directly on these numbers, the absence of uncertainty quantification is load-bearing for the central experimental claim.

    Authors: We agree that explicit uncertainty quantification would strengthen the central claims. The reported ranges reflect the continuous tuning behavior across the 6–19.6 GHz band on characterized devices, with length-resolved measurements performed on multiple waveguide lengths to isolate propagation loss. To address the referee's concern directly, we will add error bars derived from repeated measurements and device-to-device statistics in the revised Results section and abstract where appropriate. Representative raw S-parameter traces will also be included in the supplementary information to allow independent assessment of data quality. These additions will be made without changing the reported performance metrics. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the extraction of unit-time propagation loss after subtracting transducer contributions assumes that meander-line radiation impedance remains matched to the MSSW dispersion across the entire 6–19.6 GHz bias sweep and that 18 μm YIG film thickness/edge variations are negligible. No independent transducer S-parameter data or film-uniformity maps are referenced to validate this subtraction procedure.

    Authors: The referee correctly notes that the subtraction procedure relies on the co-engineered matching between transducer radiation impedance and MSSW dispersion, together with the assumption of negligible film variations. The manuscript justifies this through the observed low insertion losses (2.5–10.1 dB) and direct 50 Ω operation across the full bias sweep, which would be inconsistent with severe mismatch. However, we acknowledge that explicit supporting data would increase transparency. In revision we will expand the Methods section to reference the transducer design simulations and any available film-uniformity characterization from the fabrication process, and we will clarify the validity range of the subtraction assumption. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental measurements self-contained; no derivation chain reduces to inputs

full rationale

The paper reports direct experimental characterization of MSSW delay lines in microfabricated YIG waveguides, with all headline metrics (group delay 3.3–42.8 ns, insertion loss 2.5–10.1 dB, isolation 24–39 dB, unit-time losses 56–109 dB/μs, Q-factors 3002–4893) obtained from length-resolved measurements into 50 Ω. No equations, models, or fitted parameters are presented whose outputs loop back to the inputs by construction; the co-engineering of dispersion and transducer impedance is a design premise whose validity is tested by the reported data rather than assumed in a closed derivation. The work is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing self-citation or self-definitional steps.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on experimental measurements of fabricated devices using established MSSW physics and standard microfabrication; no new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5798 in / 1364 out tokens · 77031 ms · 2026-05-19T14:24:11.385786+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 92 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A Review of Integrated Systems and Components for 6G Wireless Communication in the D -Band,

    T. Maiwald, T. Li, G. R. Hotopan et al., “A Review of Integrated Systems and Components for 6G Wireless Communication in the D -Band,” Proc. IEEE, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 220–256, 2023, doi: 10.1109/JPROC.2023.3240127

    work page doi:10.1109/jproc.2023.3240127 2023

  2. [2]

    Spatial- and Frequency-Wideband Effects in Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Systems,

    B. Wang, F. Gao, S. Jin et al., “Spatial- and Frequency-Wideband Effects in Millimeter-Wave Massive MIMO Systems,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, vol. 66, no. 13, pp. 3393–3406, 2018, doi: 10.1109/TSP.2018.2831628

    work page doi:10.1109/tsp.2018.2831628 2018

  3. [3]

    The theory and design of chirp radars,

    J. R. Klauder, A. C. Price, S. Darlington et al., “The theory and design of chirp radars,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 39, no. 4, pp. 745–808, 1960, doi: 10.1002/j.1538-7305.1960.tb03942.x

    work page doi:10.1002/j.1538-7305.1960.tb03942.x 1960

  4. [4]

    Tunable microwave component technologies for SatCom-platforms,

    H. Maune, M. Nikfalazar, C. Schuster et al. , “Tunable microwave component technologies for SatCom-platforms,” in 2016 German Microwave Conference (GeMiC) , 2016, pp. 23–26, doi: 10.1109/GEMIC.2016.7461546

    work page doi:10.1109/gemic.2016.7461546 2016

  5. [6]

    Effect of phonon interactions on limiting the f.Q product of micromechanical resonators,

    R. Tabrizian, M. Rais-Zadeh, and F. Ayazi, “Effect of phonon interactions on limiting the f.Q product of micromechanical resonators,” in Proc. Int. Solid-State Sensors, Actuat. Microsyst. Conf., 2009, pp. 2131–2134, doi: 10.1109/SENSOR.2009.5285627

    work page doi:10.1109/sensor.2009.5285627 2009

  6. [7]

    A Wide Tunable Hysteresis CML Delay Cell for High Frequency,

    I. Som, and T. K. Bhattacharyya, “A Wide Tunable Hysteresis CML Delay Cell for High Frequency,” IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett., vol. 30, no. 7, pp. 641–644, 2020, doi: 10.1109/LMWC.2020.2997787

    work page doi:10.1109/lmwc.2020.2997787 2020

  7. [8]

    5-GHz Injection-Locked Delay Cell With 10 –25 ns Adjustable Group Delay in SiGe BiCMOS,

    A. S. Nazhad, A. Alizadeh, M. Frounchi et al., “5-GHz Injection-Locked Delay Cell With 10 –25 ns Adjustable Group Delay in SiGe BiCMOS,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II: Express Briefs, vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1042–1046, 2024, doi: 10.1109/TCSII.2023.3286417

    work page doi:10.1109/tcsii.2023.3286417 2024

  8. [9]

    A K-Band CMOS V oltage Controlled Delay Line Based on an Artificial Left-Handed Transmission Line,

    C. Y . Kim, J. Yang, D. W. Kim et al., “A K-Band CMOS V oltage Controlled Delay Line Based on an Artificial Left-Handed Transmission Line,” IEEE Microw. Wirel. Compon. Lett., vol. 18, no. 11, pp. 731–733, 2008, doi: 10.1109/LMWC.2008.2005224

    work page doi:10.1109/lmwc.2008.2005224 2008

  9. [10]

    DRL-VO: Learning to navigate through crowded dynamic scenes using velocity obstacles.IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 39(4):2700– 2719, 2023

    T. Forbes, B. Magstadt, J. Moody et al. , “A 0.2–2 GHz Time -Interleaved Multistage Switched - Capacitor Delay Element Achieving 2.55–448.6 ns Programmable Delay Range and 330 ns/mm2 Area Efficiency,” IEEE J. Solid -State Circuits, vol. 58, no. 8, pp. 2349–2359, 2023, doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2023.3257545

    work page doi:10.1109/jssc.2023.3257545 2023

  10. [15]

    Multimode-enabled silicon photonic delay lines: break the delay- density limit,

    S. Hong, L. Zhang, J. Wu et al., “Multimode-enabled silicon photonic delay lines: break the delay- density limit,” Light: Science & Applications, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 145, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41377-025- 01820-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377-025- 2025

  11. [21]

    High-performance magnetostatic wave resonators based on deep anisotropic etching of gadolinium gallium garnet substrates,

    S. Tiwari, A. Ashok, C. Devitt et al., “High-performance magnetostatic wave resonators based on deep anisotropic etching of gadolinium gallium garnet substrates,” Nature Electronics, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 267–275, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41928-025-01345-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41928-025-01345-x 2025

  12. [23]

    An edge-coupled magnetostatic bandpass filter,

    C. Devitt, R. Wang, S. Tiwari et al., “An edge-coupled magnetostatic bandpass filter,” Nat. Commun., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 7764, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-51735-6

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-024-51735-6 2024

  13. [24]

    A Magnetostatic Surface Wave Filter Tunable Over 8-32 GHz Realized in Thickness Scaled Yttrium Iron Garnet,

    X. Du, S. Yao, S. Wu et al., “A Magnetostatic Surface Wave Filter Tunable Over 8-32 GHz Realized in Thickness Scaled Yttrium Iron Garnet,” in 2025 IEEE/MTT-S International Microwave Symposium - IMS 2025, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2025, pp. 890–893, doi: 10.1109/IMS40360.2025.11103895

    work page doi:10.1109/ims40360.2025.11103895 2025

  14. [25]

    Spatially tailored spin wave excitation for spurious -free, low -loss magnetostatic wave filters with ultra -wide frequency tunability,

    S. Wu, S. Yao, X. Du et al. , "Spatially tailored spin wave excitation for spurious -free, low -loss magnetostatic wave filters with ultra -wide frequency tunability," arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.14469, 2025

    work page arXiv 2025

  15. [26]

    Spin-wave microscale RF delay lines for mid - and high- frequency 5G band,

    K. Davídková, K. O. Levchenko, R. O. Serha et al., “Spin-wave microscale RF delay lines for mid - and high- frequency 5G band,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 138, no. 14, 2025, doi: 10.1063/5.0286108

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0286108 2025

  16. [27]

    Frequency Tunable Impedance Transformer based on Magnetostatic Wave Resonator,

    C.-Y . Chang, S. Yao, X. Du et al., “Frequency Tunable Impedance Transformer based on Magnetostatic Wave Resonator,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., pp. 1–1, 2026, doi: 10.1109/LED.2026.3680067

    work page doi:10.1109/led.2026.3680067 2026

  17. [28]

    Meander Line Transducer Empowered Low-Loss Tunable Magnetostatic Wave Filters with Zero Static Power Consumption,

    X. Du, S. Yao, Y . Ding et al., “Meander Line Transducer Empowered Low-Loss Tunable Magnetostatic Wave Filters with Zero Static Power Consumption,” in 2024 IEEE/MTT -S International Microwave Symposium - IMS 2024, Washington, DC, USA, 2024, pp. 42–45, doi: 10.1109/IMS40175.2024.10600197

    work page doi:10.1109/ims40175.2024.10600197 2024

  18. [29]

    Spin-wave band-pass filters for 6G communication,

    C. Devitt, S. Tiwari, B. Zivasatienraj et al., “Spin-wave band-pass filters for 6G communication,” Nature, vol. 650, no. 8102, pp. 599–605, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41586-025-10057-3

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-025-10057-3 2026

  19. [30]

    Life and death of colloidal bonds control the rate-dependent rheology of gels

    X. Du, Y . Ding, S. Yao et al., “A wideband tunable, nonreciprocal bandpass filter using magnetostatic 19 surface waves with zero static power consumption,” Nat. Commun., 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41467- 026- 68289-4

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467- 2026

  20. [32]

    Delay Lines Based on Magnetostatic V olume Waves in Epitaxial YIG,

    Z. M. Bardai, J. D. Adam, J. H. Collins et al., “Delay Lines Based on Magnetostatic V olume Waves in Epitaxial YIG,” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 268–270, 1976, doi: 10.1063/1.2946096

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2946096 1976

  21. [33]

    Magnetostatic delay lines for group delay equalization in millimetric waveguide communication systems,

    J. Adam, J. Owens, and J. Collins, “Magnetostatic delay lines for group delay equalization in millimetric waveguide communication systems,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 783–786, 1974, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.1974.1058403

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.1974.1058403 1974

  22. [34]

    Active magnetostatic wave delay line,

    Y . K. Fetisov, P. Kabos, and C. E. Patton, “Active magnetostatic wave delay line,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 259–271, 1998, doi: 10.1109/20.650254

    work page doi:10.1109/20.650254 1998

  23. [35]

    Unidirectional microwave transduction with chirality selected short- wavelength magnon excitations,

    Y . Li, T.-H. Lo, J. Lim et al., “Unidirectional microwave transduction with chirality selected short- wavelength magnon excitations,” Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 123, no. 2, 2023, doi: 10.1063/5.0156369

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0156369 2023

  24. [36]

    Variable magnetostatic wave delay lines,

    S. N. Bajpai, R. W. Weinert, and J. D. Adam, “Variable magnetostatic wave delay lines,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 990–996, 1985, doi: 10.1063/1.336147

    work page doi:10.1063/1.336147 1985

  25. [39]

    Magnetostatic Surface-Wave Transducers,

    J. C. Sethares, “Magnetostatic Surface-Wave Transducers,” IEEE Trans. Microwave Theory Tech., vol. 27, no. 11, pp. 902–909, 1979, doi: 10.1109/TMTT.1979.1129760

    work page doi:10.1109/tmtt.1979.1129760 1979

  26. [41]

    J. F. Rosenbaum, Bulk Acoustic Wave Theory and Devices: Artech House, 1988, pp. 12-15

    work page 1988

  27. [57]

    5 GHz Acoustic Delay Lines using Antisymmetric Mode in Lithium Niobate Thin Film

    R. Lu, Y . Yang, M. Breen et al., “5 GHz Acoustic Delay Lines using Antisymmetric Mode in Lithium Niobate Thin Film.” pp. 265–268. 1 Supplementary Information Di spersion Engineered Frequency Tunable Delay Platform based on Magnetostatic Surface Spin Waves Chin-Yu Chang1, Xingyu Du1, Shun Yao1, Tao Wang1, Shuxian Wu1, and Roy H. Olsson III1 1Department of...

    work page arXiv 2000

  28. [58]

    23000 0.15 Thin-Film LN

    work page

  29. [59]

    This note provides the detailed benchmarking data for the acoustic delay lines used to generate Fig

    73000 1.27 SOI This work @ 6.13 GHz 55.68 20.3 MSSW YIG This work @ 8.8 GHz 70.60 21.6 This work @ 11.45 GHz 77.40 26.4 This work @ 14.1 GHz 89.54 28.2 This work @ 16.82 GHz 98.95 33.6 This work @ 19.6 GHz 108.87 42.8 13 Supplementary Note 5: Benchmarking with acoustic delay lines. This note provides the detailed benchmarking data for the acoustic delay l...

    work page

  30. [60]

    0.78 62 343 Plate Wave AlScN

    work page

  31. [61]

    0.83 10.4 2184 SAW LN/SiO2/Sapphire

    work page

  32. [62]

    0.88 21.2 1130 SAW LN/SiO2/Si

    work page

  33. [63]

    0.91 43.5 571 SAW LN/SiO2/Si

    work page

  34. [64]

    0.96 5.9 4447 Plate Wave LN

    work page

  35. [65]

    1.02 -- 2013 SAW LN-on-SiC

    work page 2013

  36. [66]

    1.12 32 957 SAW LN-on-Sapp

    work page

  37. [67]

    1.32 20.2 1787 SAW LN-on-SiC

    work page

  38. [68]

    1.68 31.1 1475 SAW LT/SiO2/Si

    work page

  39. [69]

    1.69 18.9 2446 SAW LT/SiO2/Si

    work page

  40. [70]

    2.32 155.9 406 SAW LN-on-SiC

    work page

  41. [71]

    2.70 27.5 2668 SAW LN-on-SiC

    work page

  42. [72]

    4.60 75.1 1671 Plate Wave LN

    work page

  43. [73]

    4.80 69.8 1876 Plate Wave LN

    work page

  44. [74]

    5.00 71 1921 Plate Wave LN

    work page 1921

  45. [75]

    5.00 79.7 1711 Plate Wave LN

    work page

  46. [76]

    5.35 45.5 3210 Plate Wave LN

    work page

  47. [77]

    5.40 72.4 2036 Plate Wave LN

    work page 2036

  48. [78]

    5.55 244.5 620 Plate Wave AlScN

    work page

  49. [79]

    5.90 53.2 3044 SAW AlScN-on-Sapp

    work page

  50. [80]

    8.02 875.4 250 Plate Wave AlScN

    work page

  51. [81]

    8.30 57.3 2375 Plate Wave AlScN

    work page

  52. [82]

    8.55 151.2 1543 Plate Wave LN

    work page

  53. [83]

    9.40 167.9 1400 Plate Wave AlScN

    work page

  54. [84]

    10.15 103.3 2400 Plate Wave AlScN

    work page

  55. [85]

    10.50 454.7 675 Plate Wave AlScN

    work page

  56. [86]

    11.50 232.8 1348 Plate Wave LN

    work page

  57. [87]

    15.60 -- 1200 Plate Wave 2-layer P3F LN

    work page

  58. [88]

    18.50 -- 350 Plate Wave AlScN

    work page

  59. [89]

    To provide a clearer overview of the device fabrication sequence, this supplementary note includes a graphical process flow, as shown in SI -Fig

    24.40 -- 313 Plate Wave AlScN This Work 6.14 55.7 3002 MSSW YIG-on-GGG 8.8 70.6 3387 11.47 77.4 4034 14.16 89.5 4291 16.87 99 4641 19.63 108.9 4893 14 Supplementary Note 6: Graphical fabrication process flow and fabrication results The detailed fabrication process is described in the Methods section of the manuscript. To provide a clearer overview of the ...

    work page

  60. [90]

    Hot phosphoric acid etching

    work page

  61. [91]

    PVD Al deposition and ICP-RIE patterning

    BCB planarization 4. PVD Al deposition and ICP-RIE patterning

    work page

  62. [92]

    YIG-on-GGG wafer YIG GGG 15

    work page

  63. [93]

    Magnonic Waveguides Studied by Microfocus Brillouin Light Scattering,

    V . E. Demidov, and S. O. Demokritov, “Magnonic Waveguides Studied by Microfocus Brillouin Light Scattering,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. 51, no. 4, pp. 1–15, 2015, doi: 10.1109/TMAG.2014.2388196

    work page doi:10.1109/tmag.2014.2388196 2015

  64. [94]

    Excitation of propagating spin waves in ferromagnetic films,

    B. A. Kalinikos, “Excitation of propagating spin waves in ferromagnetic films,” IEE Proceedings H (Microwaves, Optics and Antennas), vol. 127, no. 1, pp. 4–10, 1980, doi: 10.1049/ip-h-1.1980.0002

    work page doi:10.1049/ip-h-1.1980.0002 1980

  65. [95]

    Phenomenological propagation loss theory for magnetostatic waves in thin ferrite films,

    D. D. Stancil, “Phenomenological propagation loss theory for magnetostatic waves in thin ferrite films,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 59, no. 1, pp. 218–224, 1986, doi: 10.1063/1.336867

    work page doi:10.1063/1.336867 1986

  66. [96]

    Sub-micrometer yttrium iron garnet LPE films with low ferromagnetic resonance losses,

    C. Dubs, O. Surzhenko, R. Linke et al., “Sub-micrometer yttrium iron garnet LPE films with low ferromagnetic resonance losses,” Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, vol. 50, no. 20, pp. 204005, 2017, doi: 10.1088/1361-6463/aa6b1c

    work page doi:10.1088/1361-6463/aa6b1c 2017

  67. [97]

    Integrated Ultra-Low-Loss 4-Bit Tunable Delay for Broadband Phased Array Antenna Applications,

    R. L. Moreira, J. Garcia, W. Li et al., “Integrated Ultra-Low-Loss 4-Bit Tunable Delay for Broadband Phased Array Antenna Applications,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 25, no. 12, pp. 1165–1168, 2013, doi: 10.1109/LPT.2013.2261807

    work page doi:10.1109/lpt.2013.2261807 2013

  68. [98]

    Silicon photonic paper-clip spiral delay lines with ultra-low delay loss of 0.5 dB/ns,

    B. Hashemi, M. A. Méndez-Rosales, P. Edke et al., “Silicon photonic paper-clip spiral delay lines with ultra-low delay loss of 0.5 dB/ns,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2512.13391, 2025, doi:

    work page arXiv 2025

  69. [99]

    A High Performance Silicon Nitride Optical Delay Line With Good Expansibility,

    D. Lin, S. Shi, W. Cheng et al., “A High Performance Silicon Nitride Optical Delay Line With Good Expansibility,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 209–217, 2023, doi: 10.1109/JLT.2022.3213573

    work page doi:10.1109/jlt.2022.3213573 2023

  70. [100]

    Ultralow-loss compact silicon photonic waveguide spirals and delay lines,

    S. Hong, L. Zhang, Y . Wang et al., “Ultralow-loss compact silicon photonic waveguide spirals and delay lines,” Photon. Res., vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2022, doi: 10.1364/PRJ.437726

    work page doi:10.1364/prj.437726 2022

  71. [101]

    Minotto, P.A

    S. Hong, L. Zhang, J. Wu et al., “Multimode-enabled silicon photonic delay lines: break the delay- density limit,” Light: Science & Applications, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 145, 2025, doi: 10.1038/s41377- 025-01820-2

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377- 2025

  72. [102]

    Continuously tunable ultra-thin silicon waveguide optical delay line,

    X. Wang, L. Zhou, R. Li et al., “Continuously tunable ultra-thin silicon waveguide optical delay line,” Optica, vol. 4, no. 5, pp. 507–515, 2017, doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.4.000507

    work page doi:10.1364/optica.4.000507 2017

  73. [103]

    A Seven Bit Silicon Optical True Time Delay Line for Ka-Band Phased Array Antenna,

    P. Zheng, C. Wang, X. Xu et al., “A Seven Bit Silicon Optical True Time Delay Line for Ka-Band Phased Array Antenna,” IEEE Photonics Journal, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 1–9, 2019, doi: 10.1109/JPHOT.2019.2927487

    work page doi:10.1109/jphot.2019.2927487 2019

  74. [104]

    Digitally tunable optical delay line based on thin-film lithium niobate featuring high switching speed and low optical loss,

    W. Ke, Y . Lin, M. He et al., “Digitally tunable optical delay line based on thin-film lithium niobate featuring high switching speed and low optical loss,” Photon. Res., vol. 10, no. 11, pp. 2575–2583, 2022, doi: 10.1364/PRJ.471534

    work page doi:10.1364/prj.471534 2022

  75. [105]

    Scalable and reconfigurable true time delay line based on an ultra-low-loss silica waveguide,

    Q. Q. Song, Z. F. Hu, and K. X. Chen, “Scalable and reconfigurable true time delay line based on an ultra-low-loss silica waveguide,” Appl. Opt., vol. 57, no. 16, pp. 4434–4439, 2018, doi: 10.1364/AO.57.004434

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.57.004434 2018

  76. [106]

    Seven-bit reconfigurable optical true time delay line based on silicon integration,

    J. Xie, L. Zhou, Z. Li et al., “Seven-bit reconfigurable optical true time delay line based on silicon integration,” Opt. Express, vol. 22, no. 19, pp. 22707–22715, 2014, doi: 10.1364/OE.22.022707

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.22.022707 2014

  77. [107]

    Low Loss Al0.7Sc0.3N Thin Film Acoustic Delay Lines,

    S. Shao, Z. Luo, Y . Lu et al., “Low Loss Al0.7Sc0.3N Thin Film Acoustic Delay Lines,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 647–650, 2022, doi: 10.1109/LED.2022.3152908

    work page doi:10.1109/led.2022.3152908 2022

  78. [108]

    Full- waveform inversion with resolution proxies for in-vivo ultrasound computed tomography

    C.-H. Tsai, T.-H. Hsu, Z.-Q. Lee et al., “Low Propagation Loss Acoustic Delay Lines based on YX- LiNbO 3/SiO2/Sapphire,” in Proc. IEEE Ultrason. Int. Symp., Montreal, QC, Canada, 2023, pp. 1–4, doi: 10.1109/IUS51837.2023.10307572

    work page doi:10.1109/ius51837.2023.10307572 2023

  79. [109]

    Sub-3dB Insertion Loss Broadband Acoustic Delay Lines 16 and High Fom Resonators in LiNbO3/SiO2/Si Functional Substrate,

    C.-C. Yeh, C.-H. Tsai, G.-L. Wu et al., “Sub-3dB Insertion Loss Broadband Acoustic Delay Lines 16 and High Fom Resonators in LiNbO3/SiO2/Si Functional Substrate,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Micro Electro Mech. Syst., Munich, Germany, 2023, pp. 1194–1197, doi: 10.1109/MEMS49605.2023.10052343

    work page doi:10.1109/mems49605.2023.10052343 2023

  80. [110]

    Towards Digitally Addressable Delay Synthesis: GHZ Low- Loss Acoustic Delay Elements from 20 NS to 900 NS,

    R. Lu, T. Manzaneque, Y . Yang et al., “Towards Digitally Addressable Delay Synthesis: GHZ Low- Loss Acoustic Delay Elements from 20 NS to 900 NS,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Micro Electro Mech. Syst., Seoul, Korea (South), 2019, pp. 121–124, doi: 10.1109/MEMSYS.2019.8870729

    work page doi:10.1109/memsys.2019.8870729 2019

Showing first 80 references.