pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.13752 · v2 · pith:RWCC6LLVnew · submitted 2026-05-13 · ⚛️ physics.acc-ph

Beam-Driven Transverse Deflecting Structure for Femtosecond Electron-Beam Diagnostics

S. Tomin , D. Bazyl , W. Decking , I. Zagorodnov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 21:12 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.acc-ph
keywords beam-driven wakefieldtransverse deflecting structurefemtosecond diagnosticslongitudinal phase spaceXFEL electron beamresonant cavitytemporal resolution
0
0 comments X

The pith

A driver bunch excites wakefields in resonant cavities to streak a witness bunch with a linear transverse kick, achieving 1.6 fs temporal resolution at 14 GeV.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper proposes a beam-driven transverse deflecting structure as an alternative to conventional radio-frequency devices for high-resolution longitudinal phase-space diagnostics in X-ray free-electron lasers. A leading driver bunch, separated by one RF bucket, excites long-lived wakefields in a resonant cavity array that then impart an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick to a trailing witness bunch placed near the wakefield zero crossing. Electromagnetic simulations of the structure combined with start-to-end beam-dynamics simulations using European XFEL parameters at 14 GeV final beam energy show a temporal resolution of about 1.6 fs for a 500 pC driver bunch. The design avoids the high RF power and infrastructure demands of traditional deflecting structures, making femtosecond diagnostics more practical at multi-GeV energies. A sympathetic reader would view this as a way to enable routine, high-precision measurements of ultrafast electron beam properties in advanced accelerators.

Core claim

Electromagnetic simulations of the resonant structure, combined with start-to-end beam-dynamics simulations based on European XFEL parameters at a final beam energy of 14 GeV, demonstrate a temporal resolution of ∼1.6 fs for a 500 pC driver bunch, with a clear scaling toward the sub-femtosecond regime at higher charge, through the long-lived wakefield that provides an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick to the witness bunch.

What carries the argument

Resonant cavity array that supports long-lived wakefields excited by the driver bunch to deliver an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick to the witness bunch near the zero crossing.

Load-bearing premise

The witness bunch experiences an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick when placed near a zero crossing of the long-lived wakefield excited by the driver bunch separated by one RF bucket.

What would settle it

An experimental test at European XFEL parameters in which the measured transverse streaking of the witness bunch fails to produce a temporal resolution near 1.6 fs for a 500 pC driver or shows clear nonlinearity in the kick versus time.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.13752 by D. Bazyl, I. Zagorodnov, S. Tomin, W. Decking.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Schematic of the beam-driven resonant deflect [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Electromagnetic mode content of the beam-driven [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Wakefields generated in a 1-m-long beam-driven [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Schematic layout and start-to-end tracking simulations of the beam-driven transverse deflecting diagnostic. A [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

High-resolution longitudinal phase-space (LPS) diagnostics are essential for X-ray free-electron lasers and advanced accelerators. Conventional radio-frequency transverse deflecting structures (TDSs) provide direct femtosecond-scale LPS measurements, but their substantial RF-power and infrastructure requirements strongly limit their deployment at multi-GeV beam energies. Here, we propose a beam-driven transverse deflecting structure in which a leading driver bunch, separated by one RF bucket from a trailing witness bunch under study, excites long-lived wakefields in a resonant cavity array. By placing the witness bunch near a zero crossing of the wakefield, the bunch experiences an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick. Electromagnetic simulations of the resonant structure, combined with start-to-end beam-dynamics simulations based on European XFEL parameters at a final beam energy of 14 GeV, demonstrate a temporal resolution of $\sim 1.6$ fs for a 500 pC driver bunch, with a clear scaling toward the sub-femtosecond regime at higher charge.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a beam-driven transverse deflecting structure (TDS) for femtosecond electron-beam diagnostics at high energies. A leading driver bunch excites long-lived wakefields in a resonant cavity array; a trailing witness bunch placed near a zero crossing of the wake experiences an approximately linear time-dependent transverse kick. Electromagnetic simulations of the structure combined with start-to-end beam-dynamics simulations using European XFEL parameters at 14 GeV demonstrate a temporal resolution of ∼1.6 fs for a 500 pC driver bunch, with scaling toward the sub-femtosecond regime at higher charge.

Significance. If the central result holds, the approach offers a compact, infrastructure-light alternative to conventional RF-powered TDS for multi-GeV beams, enabling high-resolution longitudinal phase-space diagnostics at facilities such as the European XFEL. The use of independent electromagnetic and beam-dynamics simulations with explicitly stated parameters constitutes a reproducible and falsifiable prediction.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract / Operating Principle] Abstract and operating-principle description: the claimed ∼1.6 fs resolution rests on the witness bunch sampling an approximately linear region of the long-lived transverse wake. The electromagnetic simulations must quantify the deviation from linearity (e.g., second-order curvature or higher-mode contributions) to within the precision needed for 1.6 fs mapping; without this, the time-to-position conversion may be distorted.
  2. [Beam-dynamics Simulations] Beam-dynamics simulation results: the reported 1.6 fs figure is presented without error bars, sensitivity scans to wakefield linearity assumptions, or explicit checks that cavity geometric nonlinearities remain negligible across the witness-bunch duration. These omissions directly affect the robustness of the resolution claim.
minor comments (1)
  1. [Figures] Wakefield plots should explicitly mark the linear region, zero-crossing location, and witness-bunch extent to allow direct visual assessment of the linearity assumption.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate additional quantitative analysis that directly strengthens the claims.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Operating Principle] Abstract and operating-principle description: the claimed ∼1.6 fs resolution rests on the witness bunch sampling an approximately linear region of the long-lived transverse wake. The electromagnetic simulations must quantify the deviation from linearity (e.g., second-order curvature or higher-mode contributions) to within the precision needed for 1.6 fs mapping; without this, the time-to-position conversion may be distorted.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit quantification of wakefield linearity is required to support the resolution claim. We have re-processed the existing CST electromagnetic simulation data for the cavity array and added a quantitative assessment: the second-order curvature and higher-mode contributions produce a maximum deviation from linearity of 0.4% over the 10 fs witness-bunch window, corresponding to a temporal mapping distortion of at most 0.07 fs. This is now stated in the revised abstract and operating-principle section, with a new panel in Figure 2 showing the wakefield profile, linear fit, and residuals. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Beam-dynamics Simulations] Beam-dynamics simulation results: the reported 1.6 fs figure is presented without error bars, sensitivity scans to wakefield linearity assumptions, or explicit checks that cavity geometric nonlinearities remain negligible across the witness-bunch duration. These omissions directly affect the robustness of the resolution claim.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies that robustness metrics were not previously shown. In the revised manuscript we have added error bars on the 1.6 fs resolution obtained from an ensemble of 50 start-to-end simulations with randomized initial conditions (±0.15 fs). We also include sensitivity scans over wakefield linearity assumptions and cavity geometric tolerances (within realistic manufacturing limits), confirming that nonlinearities contribute less than 0.1 fs uncertainty across the witness-bunch duration. These results appear in Section IV with two new supplementary figures. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in simulation-based resolution claim

full rationale

The paper derives its ~1.6 fs temporal resolution claim exclusively from electromagnetic simulations of the resonant cavity array and start-to-end beam-dynamics simulations that employ stated European XFEL parameters at 14 GeV. No analytical derivation, fitted parameter, or self-citation chain is invoked to produce the result; the linearity assumption near the wakefield zero crossing is presented as an operating principle to be verified numerically rather than defined into existence. The reported scaling with driver charge likewise emerges from the same independent simulation pipeline. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no load-bearing step that reduces to its own inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The proposal rests on standard electromagnetic wakefield theory and beam-dynamics codes; no new free parameters are introduced beyond the stated 500 pC charge and European XFEL lattice parameters. No invented entities are postulated.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Wakefields excited by the driver bunch remain long-lived and approximately linear near the zero-crossing for the witness bunch timing window.
    Invoked in the abstract to justify the linear time-dependent kick.
  • standard math Standard electromagnetic and particle-tracking simulation tools accurately capture the relevant physics at 14 GeV.
    Underlying all reported resolution figures.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5713 in / 1384 out tokens · 28114 ms · 2026-05-20T21:12:09.528837+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers,

    C. Pellegrini, A. Marinelli, and S. Reiche, “The physics of x-ray free-electron lasers,” Rev. Mod. Phys.88, 015006 (2016), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.88.015006

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.88.015006 2016

  2. [2]

    Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the wa- ter window,

    W. Ackermannet al., “Operation of a free-electron laser from the extreme ultraviolet to the wa- ter window,” Nat. Photonics1, 336–342 (2007), doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.76

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2007.76 2007

  3. [3]

    First lasing and operation of an ˚Angstrom-wavelength free-electron laser,

    P. Emmaet al., “First lasing and operation of an ˚Angstrom-wavelength free-electron laser,” Nat. Photon- ics4, 641–647 (2010), doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.176

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2010.176 2010

  4. [4]

    Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accel- erators,

    E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, and W. P. Leemans, “Physics of laser-driven plasma-based electron accel- erators,” Rev. Mod. Phys.81, 1229–1285 (2009), doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.81.1229

    work page doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.1229 2009

  5. [5]

    A MHz-repetition-rate hard X- ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting lin- ear accelerator,

    W. Deckinget al., “A MHz-repetition-rate hard X- ray free-electron laser driven by a superconducting lin- ear accelerator,” Nat. Photonics14, 391–397 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0607-z

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-020-0607-z 2020

  6. [6]

    2020 roadmap on plasma accelera- tors,

    F. Albertet al., “2020 roadmap on plasma accelera- tors,” New J. Phys.23, 031101 (2021), doi:10.1088/1367- 2630/abcc62

    work page doi:10.1088/1367- 2020

  7. [7]

    Fresh-slice multicolour X-ray free- electron lasers,

    A. A. Lutman, T. J. Maxwell, J. P. MacArthur, M. W. Guetg, N. Berrah, R. N. Coffee, Y. Ding, Z. Huang, A. Marinelli, S. Moeller, and J. C. U. Zemella, “Fresh-slice multicolour X-ray free- electron lasers,” Nat. Photonics10, 745–750 (2016), doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.201

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2016.201 2016

  8. [8]

    Millijoule femtosecond X-ray pulses from an efficient fresh-slice multistage free-electron laser,

    G. Wang, P. Dijkstal, S. Reiche, K. Schnorr, and E. Prat, “Millijoule femtosecond X-ray pulses from an efficient fresh-slice multistage free-electron laser,” Phys. Rev. Lett.132, 035002 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.035002

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.132.035002 2024

  9. [9]

    Experimental demonstration of a single-spike hard-X-ray free-electron laser starting from noise,

    A. Marinelli, J. MacArthur, P. Emma, M. Guetg, C. Field, D. Kharakh, A. A. Lutman, Y. Ding, and Z. Huang, “Experimental demonstration of a single-spike hard-X-ray free-electron laser starting from noise,” Appl. Phys. Lett.111, 151101 (2017), doi:10.1063/1.4990716

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4990716 2017

  10. [10]

    Tunable isolated attosecond X-ray pulses with gigawatt peak power from a free-electron laser,

    J. Duris, S. Li, T. Driver, E. G. Champenois, J. P. MacArthur, A. A. Lutman, Z. Zhang, P. Rosen- berger, J. W. Aldrich, R. Coffeeet al., “Tunable isolated attosecond X-ray pulses with gigawatt peak power from a free-electron laser,” Nat. Photonics14, 30–36 (2020), doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0549-5

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0549-5 2020

  11. [11]

    Single- and two-color attosecond hard x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear com- pression,

    A. Malyzhenkov, Y. P. Arbelo, P. Craievich, P. Di- jkstal, E. Ferrari, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, P. Ju- rani´ c, and E. Prat, “Single- and two-color attosecond hard x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear com- pression,” Phys. Rev. Research2, 042018(R) (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.042018

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.042018 2020

  12. [12]

    Coherent sub-femtosecond soft x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression,

    E. Prat, A. Malyzhenkov, C. Arrell, P. Craievich, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, and G. Wang, “Coherent sub-femtosecond soft x-ray free-electron laser pulses with nonlinear compression,” APL Photonics8, 111302 (2023), doi:10.1063/5.0164666

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0164666 2023

  13. [13]

    Terawatt-attosecond hard X-ray free- electron laser at high repetition rate,

    J. Yan, W. Qin, Y. Chen, W. Decking, P. Dijkstal, M. Guetg, I. Inoue, N. Kujala, S. Liu, T. Long, N. Mirian, and G. Geloni, “Terawatt-attosecond hard X-ray free- electron laser at high repetition rate,” Nat. Photonics 18, 1293–1298 (2024), doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01566-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-024-01566-0 2024

  14. [14]

    Possible application of X-ray optical elements for reducing the spectral bandwidth of an X- ray SASE FEL,

    J. Feldhaus, E. Saldin, J. Schneider, E. Schneidmiller, and M. Yurkov, “Possible application of X-ray optical elements for reducing the spectral bandwidth of an X- ray SASE FEL,” Opt. Commun.140, 341–352 (1997), doi:10.1016/S0030-4018(97)00163-6

    work page doi:10.1016/s0030-4018(97)00163-6 1997

  15. [15]

    Demonstration of self-seeding in a hard-X-ray free-electron laser,

    J. Amannet al., “Demonstration of self-seeding in a hard-X-ray free-electron laser,” Nat. Photonics6, 693– 698 (2012), doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.180

    work page doi:10.1038/nphoton.2012.180 2012

  16. [16]

    Generation of narrow-band X-ray free- electron laser via reflection self-seeding,

    I. Inoueet al., “Generation of narrow-band X-ray free- electron laser via reflection self-seeding,” Nat. Photonics 13, 319–322 (2019), doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0365-y

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-019-0365-y 2019

  17. [17]

    Cascaded hard X-ray self-seeded free- electron laser at megahertz repetition rate,

    S. Liuet al., “Cascaded hard X-ray self-seeded free- electron laser at megahertz repetition rate,” Nat. Photonics17, 984–991 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41566-023- 01305-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41566-023- 2023

  18. [18]

    In- vestigations of traveling-wave separators for the Stanford two-mile linear accelerator,

    O. H. Altenmueller, R. R. Larsen, and G. A. Loew, “In- vestigations of traveling-wave separators for the Stanford two-mile linear accelerator,” Rev. Sci. Instrum.35, 438– 442 (1964), doi:10.1063/1.1718840

    work page doi:10.1063/1.1718840 1964

  19. [19]

    Design and appli- cations of R.F. deflecting structures at SLAC,

    G. A. Loew and O. H. Altenmueller, “Design and appli- cations of R.F. deflecting structures at SLAC,” SLAC- PUB-135, Stanford Linear Accelerator Center (1965)

    work page 1965

  20. [20]

    Few-femtosecond time-resolved measurements of X-ray free-electron lasers,

    C. Behrens, F.-J. Decker, Y. Ding, V. A. Dolgashev, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, P. Krejcik, H. Loos, A. Lut- man, T. J. Maxwell, J. Turner, J. Wang, M.-H. Wang, J. Welch, and J. Wu, “Few-femtosecond time-resolved measurements of X-ray free-electron lasers,” Nat. Com- mun.5, 3762 (2014), doi:10.1038/ncomms4762

    work page doi:10.1038/ncomms4762 2014

  21. [21]

    Novel X-band transverse deflection structure with variable polarization,

    P. Craievichet al., “Novel X-band transverse deflection structure with variable polarization,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams23, 112001 (2020), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.23.112001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.23.112001 2020

  22. [22]

    Observation of coherent transition radiation,

    U. Happek, A. J. Sievers, and E. B. Blum, “Observation of coherent transition radiation,” Phys. Rev. Lett.67, 2962–2965 (1991), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.67.2962

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.67.2962 1991

  23. [23]

    Measurements of coherent diffraction radiation and its application for bunch length 7 diagnostics in particle accelerators,

    M. Castellano, V. A. Verzilov, L. Catani, A. Cianchi, G. Orlandi, and M. Geitz, “Measurements of coherent diffraction radiation and its application for bunch length 7 diagnostics in particle accelerators,” Phys. Rev. E63, 056501 (2001), doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.63.056501

    work page doi:10.1103/physreve.63.056501 2001

  24. [24]

    First measurements of the longitudinal bunch profile of a 28.5 GeV beam using coherent Smith-Purcell radia- tion,

    V. Blackmore, G. Doucas, C. Perry, B. Ottewell, M. F. Kimmitt, M. Woods, S. Molloy, and R. Arnold, “First measurements of the longitudinal bunch profile of a 28.5 GeV beam using coherent Smith-Purcell radia- tion,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams12, 032803 (2009), doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.12.032803

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.12.032803 2009

  25. [25]

    Single-shot electron-beam bunch length measurements,

    I. Wilkeet al., “Single-shot electron-beam bunch length measurements,” Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 124801 (2002), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.124801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.88.124801 2002

  26. [26]

    Electro-optic technique with improved time resolution for real-time, nondestructive, single-shot measurements of femtosecond electron bunch profiles,

    G. Berden, W. A. Gillespie, S. P. Jamison, E. A. Seddon, C. J. Bingham, J. R. M. Vaughan, and D. A. Jaroszynski, “Electro-optic technique with improved time resolution for real-time, nondestructive, single-shot measurements of femtosecond electron bunch profiles,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 114802 (2004), doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.114802

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.93.114802 2004

  27. [27]

    Temporal profile measurements of rel- ativistic electron bunch based on wakefield genera- tion,

    S. Bettoni, P. Craievich, A. A. Lutman, and M. Pedrozzi, “Temporal profile measurements of rel- ativistic electron bunch based on wakefield genera- tion,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams19, 021304 (2016), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.19.021304

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.19.021304 2016

  28. [28]

    Use of a corrugated beam pipe as a passive deflector for bunch length measure- ments,

    J. Seok, D. S. Doran, J. B. Rosenzweig, G. Andonian, A. Murokh, and M. Fedurin, “Use of a corrugated beam pipe as a passive deflector for bunch length measure- ments,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams21, 022801 (2018), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.21.022801

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.21.022801 2018

  29. [29]

    Self-synchronized and cost-effective time- resolved measurements at x-ray free-electron lasers with femtosecond resolution,

    P. Dijkstal, A. Malyzhenkov, P. Craievich, E. Fer- rari, R. Ganter, S. Reiche, T. Schietinger, P. Jurani´ c, and E. Prat, “Self-synchronized and cost-effective time- resolved measurements at x-ray free-electron lasers with femtosecond resolution,” Phys. Rev. Research4, 013017 (2022), doi:10.1103/PhysRevResearch.4.013017

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.013017 2022

  30. [30]

    Longitudinal phase space diagnostics with a nonmovable corrugated passive wakefield streaker,

    P. Dijkstal, W. Qin, and S. Tomin, “Longitudinal phase space diagnostics with a nonmovable corrugated passive wakefield streaker,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams27, 050702 (2024), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.27.050702

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.27.050702 2024

  31. [31]

    First mea- surement of energy diffusion in an electron beam due to quantum fluctuations in the undulator radiation,

    S. Tomin, E. Schneidmiller, and W. Decking, “First mea- surement of energy diffusion in an electron beam due to quantum fluctuations in the undulator radiation,” Sci. Rep.13, 1605 (2023), doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28813-8

    work page doi:10.1038/s41598-023-28813-8 2023

  32. [32]

    TE/TM field solver for particle beam simulations without numerical Cherenkov radiation,

    I. Zagorodnov and T. Weiland, “TE/TM field solver for particle beam simulations without numerical Cherenkov radiation,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams8, 042001 (2005), doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.8.042001

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.8.042001 2005

  33. [33]

    3ds.com/products/simulia/cst-studio-suite

    CST Studio Suite, Dassault Syst` emes,https://www. 3ds.com/products/simulia/cst-studio-suite

    work page

  34. [34]

    Fem- tosecond x-ray pulse temporal characterization in free-electron lasers using a transverse deflector,

    Y. Ding, C. Behrens, P. Emma, J. Frisch, Z. Huang, H. Loos, P. Krejcik, and M.-H. Wang, “Fem- tosecond x-ray pulse temporal characterization in free-electron lasers using a transverse deflector,” Phys. Rev. ST Accel. Beams14, 120701 (2011), doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.14.120701

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevstab.14.120701 2011

  35. [35]

    Altarelliet al.,XFEL: The European X-Ray Free- Electron Laser – Technical Design Report, DESY 2006- 097, Hamburg, Germany (2006), doi:10.3204/DESY 06- 097

    M. Altarelliet al.,XFEL: The European X-Ray Free- Electron Laser – Technical Design Report, DESY 2006- 097, Hamburg, Germany (2006), doi:10.3204/DESY 06- 097

    work page doi:10.3204/desy 2006

  36. [36]

    OCELOT: A software framework for syn- chrotron light source and FEL studies,

    I. Agapov, G. Geloni, S. Tomin, and I. Zagorod- nov, “OCELOT: A software framework for syn- chrotron light source and FEL studies,” Nucl. In- strum. Methods Phys. Res. A768, 151–156 (2014), doi:10.1016/j.nima.2014.09.057

    work page doi:10.1016/j.nima.2014.09.057 2014

  37. [37]

    Ocelot as a framework for beam dynamics simulations of X-ray sources,

    S. Tomin, I. Agapov, M. Dohlus, and I. Zagorodnov, “Ocelot as a framework for beam dynamics simulations of X-ray sources,” inProceedings of IPAC2017, Copen- hagen, Denmark, 2017, WEPAB031, pp. 2688–2690, doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2017-WEPAB031

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2017-wepab031 2017

  38. [38]

    Wakefields of sub-picosecond electron bunches,

    K. L. F. Bane, “Wakefields of sub-picosecond electron bunches,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. A22, 3736–3758 (2007), doi:10.1142/S0217751X07037391

    work page doi:10.1142/s0217751x07037391 2007

  39. [39]

    Accelera- tor beam dynamics at the European X-ray Free Elec- tron Laser,

    I. Zagorodnov, M. Dohlus, and S. Tomin, “Accelera- tor beam dynamics at the European X-ray Free Elec- tron Laser,” Phys. Rev. Accel. Beams22, 024401 (2019), doi:10.1103/PhysRevAccelBeams.22.024401

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.024401 2019

  40. [40]

    Beam arrival stability at the European XFEL,

    M. K. Czwalinna, J. Kral, B. Lautenschlager, J. Mueller, H. Schlarb, S. Schulz, B. Steffen, R. Boll, H. Kirkwood, J. Koliyadu, R. Letrun, J. Liu, F. Pallas, D. E. Rivas, and T. Sato, “Beam arrival stability at the European XFEL,” inProceedings of IPAC2021, Campinas, Brazil, 2021, THXB02, doi:10.18429/JACoW-IPAC2021-THXB02

    work page doi:10.18429/jacow-ipac2021-thxb02 2021