pith. machine review for the scientific record. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14178 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-13 · 🧮 math.GM

Recognition: 2 theorem links

· Lean Theorem

Directed Q-Analysis and Directed Higher-Order Connectivity on Digraphs: A Quantitative Approach

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 01:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.GM
keywords directed graphsQ-analysisclique complexeshigher-order connectivitysimplicial structuresdigraphsnetwork topologydirected cliques
0
0 comments X

The pith

Directed graphs can be analyzed for higher-order interactions by constructing directed clique complexes that capture multi-node directed relationships.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Traditional graph methods examine only pairwise connections, yet many networks involve simultaneous interactions among multiple nodes that carry direction. The paper constructs directed clique complexes from digraphs to represent these group-level directed structures as simplices. It then examines the connections among those directed cliques to define directed higher-order connectivities. This produces a quantitative directed Q-analysis that measures, describes, and compares the resulting simplicial structures. Readers would care because the approach supplies tools for directed data sets in which ordinary pairwise graphs lose essential group information.

Core claim

We lay out a mathematical formalism resting on directed clique complexes constructed from directed graphs, stressing the interrelations between directed cliques, leading towards a more complete directed Q-analysis that allows quantifying, characterizing, and comparing similarities involving simplicial structures.

What carries the argument

Directed clique complexes built from digraphs, which encode higher-order directed connectivities by recording how directed cliques relate to one another.

If this is right

  • Quantifies similarities among the simplicial structures of different directed networks.
  • Characterizes higher-order directed interactions that pairwise edges alone cannot reveal.
  • Supports direct comparison of directed networks on the basis of their simplicial properties.
  • Extends classical Q-analysis to the directed case in a quantitative manner.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The method could be tested on empirical digraphs such as neural or citation networks to detect directed group behaviors missed by standard metrics.
  • It may serve as a bridge between existing undirected higher-order tools and fully directed data sets.
  • Synthetic digraphs with planted directed cliques of varying sizes would provide a direct check on whether the connectivity measures recover the planted structure.

Load-bearing premise

Directed cliques can be defined consistently from any digraph and their relations will capture meaningful higher-order directed interactions without further assumptions about the data.

What would settle it

Apply the formalism to a small, fully enumerated digraph whose higher-order directed groupings are already known by exhaustive enumeration; the measured directed Q-values or connectivity patterns should fail to recover those known groupings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14178 by Andr\'e Fujita, Heitor Baldo, Koichi Sameshima, Luiz A. Baccal\'a.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Examples of directed (k + 1)-cliques, for k = 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Definition 4.3. Given a digraph G = (V, E), its directed flag complex (DFC), denoted by dFl(G), is the ADSC whose directed k-simplices span directed (k + 1)-cliques of G, i.e. for every [v0, . . . , vk] ∈ dFl(G), we have vi ∈ V , ∀i, and (vi , vj ) ∈ E, ∀i < j. Definition 4.4. The flag complex associated with the underlying undirected graph of a … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: A digraph G together with its underlying flag complex Fl(G) and its DFC dFl(G). Although the flag complex associated with a graph is an example of ASC, a DFC associated with a digraph is an example of ADSC, since the directed simplices of a DFC may not be uniquely determined by their sets of vertices, as they may differ due to the ordering of their vertices (e.g., the set of vertices associated with a doub… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: A simplicial complex and a directed flag complex. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Graphical representation of the maximal directed simplices for each level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: A DFC and its respective lower q-digraphs, for q = 0, 1, 2. The numbers inside the nodes represent the dimensions of the respective directed simplices. In the case where we have a weighted DFC obtained from a weighted digraph, by definition, the cor￾responding maximal/lower q-digraphs are node-weighted digraphs since their nodes represent directed sim￾plices. Accordingly, to obtain arc-weighted digraphs, w… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: C. elegans frontal neuronal network and its q-digraphs (q = 0, 1, 2, 3). Here, we adopt the nomenclature (−1)-digraph (i.e., q = −1) to denote the original network. 2https://snap.stanford.edu/data/C-elegans-frontal.html 3https://github.com/heitorbaldo/DigplexQ 20 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Results of the three local measures for each level [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: shows the graphical representation of G1: two directed 3-cliques, [0, 1, 2] and [3, 4, 5], connected by the bridge arc [2, 3] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: shows the graphical representation of G2: vertex 0 is the unique source (in-degree 0), and vertex 3 is the unique sink (in-degree 3) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: shows the graphical representation of G3: no three consecutive vertices form a directed triangle (cycles prevent it) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: shows the graphical representation of G4: the directed 3-cliques σ = [0, 1, 3] and τ = [1, 2, 3] share the arc [1, 3]. Vertex 0 is the unique source of σ and vertex 2 is the unique source of τ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p036_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Simulation results (n = 10, 30 trials). Mean values and standard deviations. 16 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p040_5.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Traditional graph analysis focuses on nodes and edges, that is, pairwise relationships. Yet many real-world networks, including biological, social, and communication networks, involve higher-order relationships in which multiple nodes interact simultaneously. This has led many to develop network topology analysis methods based on higher-order structures and higher-order connectivity, seeking to reveal complex interactions beyond node pairs. Many of the latter address only undirected networks. To overcome this, we lay out a mathematical formalism resting on directed clique complexes constructed from directed graphs (their "higher-order structures" or "simplicial structures''), stressing the interrelations between directed cliques (their "directed higher-order connectivities''), leading towards a more complete directed Q-analysis that allows quantifying, characterizing, and comparing similarities involving simplicial structures.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a mathematical formalism for directed Q-analysis on digraphs, based on constructing directed clique complexes as higher-order simplicial structures. It emphasizes the interrelations among directed cliques to define directed higher-order connectivities, enabling quantitative characterization and comparison of similarities in these structures for applications in biological, social, and communication networks.

Significance. If the directed-clique construction is shown to yield a valid simplicial complex with well-defined higher-order measures, the work would extend classical Q-analysis to directed settings and supply a new quantitative tool for higher-order directed interactions. The absence of free parameters in the core construction and the focus on falsifiable structural comparisons would be notable strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [Directed clique complex construction] The central construction of directed clique complexes (detailed after the abstract) must explicitly verify simplicial closure: if a directed k-clique is present, every (k-1)-face must itself be a directed clique under the identical orientation rule. No such closure proof or counter-example check on a small digraph is supplied, which directly undermines the claim that higher-order connectivities are well-defined.
  2. [Directed Q-analysis measures] The abstract and subsequent sections state goals for quantifying directed higher-order connectivities but supply neither explicit definitions of the Q-analysis measures nor worked examples on concrete digraphs. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the formalism reduces to prior undirected Q-analysis or introduces new fitted quantities.
minor comments (1)
  1. Notation for directed simplices and their faces should be introduced with a small illustrative digraph (e.g., a 3-node tournament) to clarify orientation conventions before the general definitions.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We agree that the directed clique complex construction requires explicit verification of simplicial closure and that the Q-analysis measures need concrete definitions with examples. We will incorporate these elements in the revised version to strengthen the formalism.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central construction of directed clique complexes (detailed after the abstract) must explicitly verify simplicial closure: if a directed k-clique is present, every (k-1)-face must itself be a directed clique under the identical orientation rule. No such closure proof or counter-example check on a small digraph is supplied, which directly undermines the claim that higher-order connectivities are well-defined.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit verification of simplicial closure is essential for the directed clique complex to be well-defined. The current manuscript does not contain a formal proof or small-digraph check. In the revised version we will add a proof that the construction is closed under taking faces under the directed orientation rule, together with an explicit counter-example verification on a small digraph to confirm the property holds. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The abstract and subsequent sections state goals for quantifying directed higher-order connectivities but supply neither explicit definitions of the Q-analysis measures nor worked examples on concrete digraphs. Without these, it is impossible to assess whether the formalism reduces to prior undirected Q-analysis or introduces new fitted quantities.

    Authors: We acknowledge that explicit definitions of the directed Q-analysis measures and worked examples are missing. In the revision we will supply precise mathematical definitions of the measures and include detailed worked examples on concrete small digraphs. These examples will compute the higher-order connectivities explicitly and compare them with the corresponding undirected Q-analysis to clarify reductions and novel aspects. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; purely definitional formalism

full rationale

The manuscript presents a new mathematical construction for directed clique complexes and directed Q-analysis on digraphs. All load-bearing steps are explicit definitions of directed cliques, their faces, and the resulting simplicial structures, with no fitted parameters, no 'predictions' that reduce to those parameters by construction, and no load-bearing self-citations whose justification collapses into the present work. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained and does not exhibit any of the enumerated circularity patterns.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

Abstract-only review; the central claim rests on the assumption that directed graphs admit a well-defined directed clique complex construction whose interrelations yield a usable Q-analysis. No free parameters or invented entities beyond the new complexes are visible.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Directed graphs admit a consistent construction of directed clique complexes that represent higher-order directed interactions
    Invoked as the foundation for the entire formalism in the abstract
invented entities (1)
  • directed clique complex no independent evidence
    purpose: To encode higher-order directed structures and their connectivities from digraphs
    New entity introduced to extend undirected simplicial methods

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5441 in / 1221 out tokens · 29679 ms · 2026-05-15T01:49:03.246253+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    and Dayan, M

    Abdelnour, F. and Dayan, M. and Devinsky, O. and Thesen, T. and Raj, A. Estimating brain's functional graph from the structural graph's Laplacian. Proceedings of SPIE

  2. [2]

    and Dayan, M

    Abdelnour, F. and Dayan, M. and Devinsky, O. and Thesen, T. and Raj, A. Functional brain connectivity is predictable from anatomic network's Laplacian eigen-structure. NeuroImage

  3. [3]

    and Bullmore, E

    Achard, S. and Bullmore, E. Efficiency and Cost of Economical Brain Functional Networks. PLoS Comput Biol

  4. [4]

    and Berger, E

    Aharoni, R. and Berger, E. and Meshulam, R. Eigenvalues and homology of flag complexes and vector representations of graphs. Geom. Funct. Anal

  5. [5]

    and Adeli, H

    Ahmadlou, M. and Adeli, H. and Adeli, A. Graph theoretical analysis of organization of functional brain networks in ADHD. Clinical EEG and neuroscience

  6. [6]

    and Valentín, A

    Alarcón, G. and Valentín, A. Introduction to Epilepsy

  7. [7]

    and Gupte, N

    Andjelković, M. and Gupte, N. and Tadić, B. Hidden geometry of traffic jamming. Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics

  8. [8]

    and Tadić, B

    Andjelković, M. and Tadić, B. and Melnik, R. The topology of higher-order complexes associated with brain-function hubs in human connectomes. Sci Rep

  9. [9]

    and Arizmendi, O

    Arizmendi, G. and Arizmendi, O. Energy and Randić index of directed graphs. Linear and Multilinear Algebra

  10. [10]

    Atkin, R. H. Mathematical structure in human affairs

  11. [11]

    Atkin, R. H. An algebra for patterns on a complex. I. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud

  12. [12]

    Atkin, R. H. An algebra for patterns on a complex. II. Internat. J. Man-Machine Stud

  13. [13]

    Atkin, R. H. Combinatorial Connectivities in social systems: An Application of Simplicial Complex Structures to the Study of Large Organizations. 1977

  14. [14]

    Baccalá, L. A. and Sameshima, K. Partial directed coherence: a new concept in neural structure determination. Biological cybernetics

  15. [15]

    Baccalá, L. A. and Sameshima, K. Overcoming the limitations of correlation analysis for many simultaneously processed neural structures

  16. [16]

    Baccalá, L. A. and Sameshima, K. Partial directed coherence: Some estimation issues. In World Congress on Neuroinformatics, Edited by: Rattay, F., Vienna: ARGESIM/ASIM Verlag

  17. [17]

    Baccalá, L. A. and Alvarenga, M. Y. and Sameshima, K. and Jorge, C. L. and Castro, L. H. Graph theoretical characterization and tracking of the effective neural connectivity during episodes of mesial temporal epileptic seizure. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience

  18. [18]

    Baccalá, L. A. and Sameshima, K. and Takahashi, D. Y. Generalized Partial Directed Coherence. 15th International Conference on Digital Signal Processing

  19. [19]

    Baccalá, L. A. and de Brito, C. S. and Takahashi, D. Y. and Sameshima, K. Unified asymptotic theory for all partial directed coherence forms. Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences

  20. [20]

    Baccalá, L. A. and Sameshima, K. Causality and Influentiability: The Need for Distinct Neural Connectivity Concepts. In: Slezak D., Tan AH., Peters J.F., Schwabe L. (eds) Brain Informatics and Health. BIH 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science

  21. [21]

    Baccalá, L. A. and Sameshima, K. Frequency Domain Repercussions of Instantaneous Granger Causality. Entropy (Basel, Switzerland)

  22. [22]

    Baccalá, L. A. and Sameshima, K. Partial Directed Coherence and the Vector Autoregressive Modelling Myth and a Caveat. Front. Netw. Physiol

  23. [23]

    and Geraci, F

    Baccini, F. and Geraci, F. and Bianconi, G. Weighted simplicial complexes and their representation power of higher-order network data and topology. Phys. Rev. E

  24. [24]

    , title =

    Baldo, h. , title =. 2024

  25. [25]

    and Rasekhi, J

    Bandarabadi, M. and Rasekhi, J. and Teixeira, C. A. and Karami, M. R. and Dourado, A. On the proper selection of preictal period for seizure prediction. Epilepsy & behavior : E& B

  26. [26]

    and Gutin, G

    Bang-Jensen, J. and Gutin, G. Z. Digraphs: Theory, Algorithms and Applications

  27. [27]

    Barabasi, A. L. and Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science

  28. [28]

    and Kramer, X

    Barcelo, H. and Kramer, X. and Laubenbacher, R. and Weaver, C. Foundations of a connectivity theory for simplicial complexes. Adv. Appl. Math

  29. [29]

    Bassett, D. S. and Bullmore, E. and Verchinski, B. A. and Mattay, V. S. and Weinberger, D. R. and Meyer-Lindenberg, A. Hierarchical organization of human cortical networks in health and schizophrenia. The Journal of neuroscience: the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience

  30. [30]

    Bassett, D. S. and Bullmore, E. T. Small-World Brain Networks Revisited. The Neuroscientist: a review journal bringing neurobiology, neurology and psychiatry

  31. [31]

    Communication patterns in task-oriented groups

    Bavelas, A. Communication patterns in task-oriented groups. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

  32. [32]

    Beaumont, J. R. and Gatrell, A. C. An introduction to Q-analysis

  33. [33]

    Beineke, L. W. and Wilson, R. J. (Eds.). Topics in Algebraic Graph Theory

  34. [34]

    Bernhardt, B. C. and Chen, Z. and He, Y. and Evans, A. C. and Bernasconi, N. Graph-theoretical analysis reveals disrupted small-world organization of cortical thickness correlation networks in temporal lobe epilepsy. Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991)

  35. [35]

    Algebraic Graph Theory

    Biggs, N. Algebraic Graph Theory

  36. [36]

    Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework

    Biomarkers Definitions Working Group. Biomarkers and surrogate endpoints: preferred definitions and conceptual framework. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics

  37. [37]

    Blizard, W. D. The development of multiset theory. Modern Logic

  38. [38]

    and Vigna, S

    Boldi, P. and Vigna, S. Axioms for centrality. Internet Mathematics

  39. [39]

    Modern Graph Theory

    Bollobás, B. Modern Graph Theory

  40. [40]

    Random Graphs

    Bollobás, B. Random Graphs

  41. [41]

    and Borgs, C

    Bollobás, B. and Borgs, C. and Chayes, J.T. and Riordan, O. Directed scale-free graphs. Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms

  42. [42]

    Bonacich, P. F. Power and centrality: A family of measures. Am. J. Sociol

  43. [43]

    and Nesland, T

    Bonilha, L. and Nesland, T. and Martz, G. U. and Joseph, J. E. and Spampinato, M. V. and Edwards, J. C. and et al. Medial temporal lobe epilepsy is associated with neuronal fibre loss and paradoxical increase in structural connectivity of limbic structures. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatr

  44. [44]

    , title =

    Borgwardt, M. , title =. 2007

  45. [45]

    Box, G. E. P. Science and statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association

  46. [46]

    and Ding, M

    Brovelli, A. and Ding, M. and Ledberg, A. and Chen, Y. and Nakamura, R. and Bressler, S. L. Beta oscillations in a large-scale sensorimotor cortical network: Directional influences revealed by Granger causality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America

  47. [47]

    and Hoos, H

    Brunato, M. and Hoos, H. H. and Battiti, R. On Effectively Finding Maximal Quasi-cliques in Graphs. In: Maniezzo V., Battiti R., Watson JP. (eds) Learning and Intelligent Optimization. LION 2007. Lecture Notes in Computer Science

  48. [48]

    and Billinger, M

    Brunner, C. and Billinger, M. and Seeber, M. and Mullen, T. R. and Makeig, S. Volume Conduction Influences Scalp-Based Connectivity Estimates. Frontiers in computational neuroscience

  49. [49]

    and Sporns, O

    Bullmore, E. and Sporns, O. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature reviews. Neuroscience

  50. [50]

    Bullmore, E. T. and Bassett, D. S. Brain Graphs: Graphical Models of the Human Brain Connectome. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology

  51. [51]

    and Dehmer, M

    Cao, S. and Dehmer, M. and Shi, Y. Extremality of degree-based graph entropies. Information Sciences. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2014.03.133

  52. [52]

    and Riihimäki, H

    Caputi, L. and Riihimäki, H. Hochschild homology, and a persistent approach via connectivity digraphs. J Appl. and Comput. Topology. 2024

  53. [53]

    Carlsson, G. E. and Silva, V. D. Zigzag Persistence. Foundations of Computational Mathematics

  54. [54]

    and Michel, B

    Chazal, F. and Michel, B. An Introduction to Topological Data Analysis: Fundamental and Practical Aspects for Data Scientists. Front. Artif. Intell

  55. [55]

    and Haneef, Z

    Chiang, S. and Haneef, Z. Graph theory findings in the pathophysiology of temporal lobe epilepsy. Clinical neurophysiology : official journal of the International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology

  56. [56]

    and Sparacino, L

    Chiarion, G. and Sparacino, L. and Antonacci, Y. and Faes, L. and Mesin, L. Connectivity Analysis in EEG Data: A Tutorial Review of the State of the Art and Emerging Trends. Bioengineering

  57. [57]

    and Mémoli, F

    Chowdhury, S. and Mémoli, F. Persistent homology of directed networks. 2016 50th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers

  58. [58]

    and Mémoli, F

    Chowdhury, S. and Mémoli, F. A functorial Dowker theorem and persistent homology of asymmetric networks. Journal of Applied and Computational Topology

  59. [59]

    and Mémoli, F

    Chowdhury, S. and Mémoli, F. Persistent Path Homology of Directed Networks. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms

  60. [60]

    Chung, F. R. K. Spectral graph theory

  61. [61]

    Chung, F. R. K. Complex Graphs and Networks

  62. [62]

    Churchland ,P. S. and Sejnowski, T. J. The computational brain

  63. [63]

    Cociu, B. A. and Das, S. and Billeci, L. and Jamal, W. and Maharatna, K. and Calderoni, S. and Narzisi, A. and Muratori, F. Multimodal functional and structural brain connectivity analysis in autism: A preliminary integrated approach with EEG, fMRI, and DTI. IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems

  64. [64]

    and Edelsbrunner, H

    Cohen-Steiner, D. and Edelsbrunner, H. and Harer, J. Stability of Persistence Diagrams. Discrete & Computational Geometry

  65. [65]

    and Plomp, G

    Coito, A. and Plomp, G. and Genetti, M. and Abela, E. and Wiest, R. and Seeck, M. and Michel, C. M. and Vulliemoz, S. Dynamic directed interictal connectivity in left and right temporal lobe epilepsy. Epilepsia

  66. [66]

    and Jarrah, A

    Coombs, M. and Jarrah, A. and Laubenbacher, R. Foundations of combinatorial time series analysis. preprint

  67. [67]

    Cormen, T. H. and Leiserson, C. E. and Rivest, R. L. and Stein, C. Introduction to Algorithms

  68. [68]

    Costa, L. D. and Rodrigues, F. A. and Travieso, G. and Boas, P. R. Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements. Advances in Physics

  69. [69]

    Covers, T. M. and Thomas, J. A. Elements of Information Theory

  70. [70]

    and Krishnan, B

    Covert, I. and Krishnan, B. and Najm, I. and Zhan, J. and Shore, M.W. and Hixson, J. and Po, M. Temporal Graph Convolutional Networks for Automatic Seizure Detection. Proceedings of the 4th Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference

  71. [71]

    and Ivrissimtzis, I

    Dantchev, S. and Ivrissimtzis, I. Simplicial Complex Entropy. Mathematical Methods for Curves and Surfaces

  72. [72]

    Dawson, R. J. M. Homology of weighted simplicial complexes. Cahiers de Topologie et Géométrie Différentielle Catégoriques

  73. [73]

    and Abbott, L

    Dayan, P. and Abbott, L. F. Theoretical Neuroscience: Computational and Mathematical Modeling of Neural Systems

  74. [74]

    and Pijnenburg, Y

    de Haan, W. and Pijnenburg, Y. A. and Strijers, R. L. and van der Made, Y. and van der Flier, W. M. and Scheltens, P. and Stam, C. J. Functional neural network analysis in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease using EEG and graph theory. BMC neuroscience

  75. [75]

    and Mowshowitz, A

    Dehmer, M. and Mowshowitz, A. A history of graph entropy measures. Inf. Sci.,

  76. [76]

    Structural Analysis of Complex Networks

    Dehmer (ed.), M. Structural Analysis of Complex Networks

  77. [77]

    and Streib (eds.), F

    Dehmer, M. and Streib (eds.), F. E. Quantitative Graph Theory: Mathematical Foundations and Applications

  78. [78]

    and Emmert‐Streib, F

    Dehmer, M. and Emmert‐Streib, F. and Shi, Y. Quantitative Graph Theory: A New Branch of Graph Theory and Network Science. Information Sciences

  79. [79]

    and Matar, M

    De la Cruz Cabrera, O. and Matar, M. and Reichel, L. Centrality measures for node-weighted networks via line graphs and the matrix exponential. Numer. Algor

  80. [80]

    De Lange, S. C. and de Reus, M. A. and van den Heuvel, M. P. The Laplacian spectrum of neural networks. Frontiers in Computational Neuroscience

Showing first 80 references.