arxiv: 2605.14313 · v1 · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Recognition: no theorem link

An Updated Characterization of Luminous Ly{α} emitters at the End of Reionization

Yuanhang Ning , Zheng Cai , Linhua Jiang , Yucheng Guo , Qiong Li , Si-Yue Yu , Xiaodi Yu , Zhen-Ya Zheng

Authors on Pith no claims yet

Pith reviewed 2026-05-15 02:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA

keywords Lyα emittersreionizationhigh-redshift galaxiesstarburst galaxiesescape fractionspectral energy distributionJWST observationsdwarf galaxies

0 comments

The pith

Luminous Lyα emitters at redshift 6 are low-mass ultra-young dwarf starbursts with high escape fractions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper combines deep spectroscopy with JWST medium-band imaging to re-examine 14 bright Lyα-emitting galaxies at the end of reionization. Prior mass estimates had been inflated by confusion between gas emission lines and stellar light; the new data resolve that ambiguity and show half the objects have stellar masses below 100 million solar masses, ages under 10 million years, and almost no dust. These systems also display median Lyα escape fractions above 40 percent that rise with bluer colors, indicating they are efficient producers of ionizing photons. Spatial offsets between Lyα and stellar light further point to internal dust rather than neutral gas as the main limiter of Lyα escape.

Core claim

The tightly constrained spectral energy distribution modeling demonstrates that these luminous LAEs tend to be unequivocally low-mass, ultra-young dwarf starbursts; half the sample is characterized by stellar masses of M_* < 10^8 M_⊙, ages ≲10 Myr, and negligible dust attenuation. The f_esc^Lyα values are exceptionally high, with a median of ≳40%, increasing for the bluer UV continua. Analyzing spatial offsets between the Lyα centroid and the stellar counterpart shows that internal dust content, rather than neutral hydrogen gas, dominates the suppression of Lyα radiative transfer. Strong Lyα emission is attributed to both vigorous starburst activities and the high escape fractions, making这些

What carries the argument

Integration of JWST/NIRCam medium-band F410M photometry to break the degeneracy between strong rest-optical nebular emission and Balmer breaks in spectral energy distribution fitting.

If this is right

These luminous LAEs exhibit exceptionally high Lyα escape fractions, median ≳40 percent, that increase for bluer UV continua.
Spatial offsets indicate internal dust rather than neutral hydrogen dominates Lyα suppression.
Strong Lyα emission arises from both vigorous starburst activity and the high escape fractions.
The systems function as highly efficient ionizing photon engines at the conclusion of the Epoch of Reionization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Low-mass starburst galaxies of this type may have supplied a substantial fraction of the photons that completed cosmic reionization.
The resemblance to local Lyman continuum leakers suggests these high-redshift dwarfs could also leak substantial ionizing radiation.
Surveys targeting similar young, low-mass systems at slightly lower redshifts could test whether they are numerous enough to match reionization timelines.

Load-bearing premise

The medium-band F410M photometry fully breaks the degeneracy between nebular emission lines and Balmer breaks without residual template mismatches or unaccounted-for emission-line contributions from other species.

What would settle it

Repeating the SED modeling with different stellar population synthesis templates or additional line constraints that push the majority of stellar masses above 10^9 solar masses.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14313 by Linhua Jiang, Qiong Li, Si-Yue Yu, Xiaodi Yu, Yuanhang Ning, Yucheng Guo, Zheng Cai, Zhen-Ya Zheng.

**Figure 1.** Figure 1: Thumbnail images of the LAEs in our sample (3. ′′0 × 3. ′′0, north is up and east to the left). Each LAE is shown with a top mark in each column. Each row shows images in different JWST/NIRCam bands indicated at the leftmost. In the lowest row (F444W), the dashed circles represent the 1. ′′6 aperture centered at the Lyα centroid. Note that COSMOS-z6lae-174 is not covered by F090W and F200W observations. ju… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: (a) SED fitting in the (rest-frame) UV to optical bands for the LAEs in our sample. In each panel for each LAE, the gray line represents the best-fit SED model with the light gray region representing 1σ uncertainty. The red circles and black squares are the photometric data points from JWST/NIRCam imaging observations and computations of the best-fit mode, respectively. (b) Lyα lines in the Magellan/M2FS s… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Comparison between a series of properties of the LAE sample in this work. In the f Lyα esc -β panel, the red and blue dashed lines indicate best-fit linear relations based on the LAE sample in this work and a (Lyα-emitting) LBG sample from our previous work (Ning et al. 2023), respectively. In the ∆dLyα-EW0(Lyα) panel, the dashed line gives the best-fit linear relation from our previous work (Ning et al. 2… view at source ↗

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: SFR vs. M∗ diagram: The blue dashed line show the best-fit SFMS at 6 < z ≤ 7 obtained by Clarke et al. (2024). The magenta dashed lines represent the best-fit power-law relations from Rinaldi et al. (2022). The crosses indicate the z > 5 galaxies from Curti et al. (2024). The following open markers also represent the results from the literature. The square is LCEz4-M1, a Lyman continuum emitter (LCE) candi… view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Lyα escape fraction (f Lyα esc ) and offset to stellar components (∆dLyα) as functions of dust attenuation (AV ) and Lyα line width FWHM(Lyα). In the lower left panel, the dashed line qualitatively gives a limit trend of suppressing ∆dLyα as AV increasing. 4.2. Lyα Transfer and Escape Our LAE sample exhibits non-negligible misalignment between Lyα emission and stellar components. We also reveal such pheno… view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We present a multi-wavelength physical characterization of 14 luminous Ly$\alpha$ emitters (LAEs) at $z\approx6$, integrating deep ground-based Magellan/M2FS spectroscopy with heterogeneous JWST/NIRCam broad- and medium-band imaging. Identified via strong Ly$\alpha$ lines with extreme Ly$\alpha$ luminosities of ${>}10^{42.6}$ erg s$^{-1}$, the sample exhibits very large rest-frame equivalent widths (${\gtrsim}100$ \AA) and steeply blue UV continua ($\beta_{\rm median}\simeq-2.2$, $-18.2>M_{\rm 1500}>-20.2$ mag). Crucially, the integration of NIRCam medium-band photometry (F410M) breaks the degeneracy between strong rest-optical nebular emission and Balmer breaks, resolving prior mass overestimations. The tightly constrained spectral energy distribution modeling demonstrates that these luminous LAEs tend to be unequivocally low-mass, ultra-young dwarf starbursts; half the sample is characterized by stellar masses of $M_* < 10^8 M_{\odot}$, ages $\lesssim10$ Myr, and negligible dust attenuation. We also map the production efficiency of ionizing photons and Ly$\alpha$ escape fractions ($f_{\rm esc}^{\rm Ly\alpha}$). The $f_{\rm esc}^{\rm Ly\alpha}$ values are exceptionally high, with a median of ${\gtrsim}40$%, increasing for the bluer UV continua. Finally, analyzing spatial offsets between the Ly$\alpha$ centroid and the stellar counterpart, we demonstrate empirically that internal dust content, rather than neutral hydrogen gas, dominate the suppression of Ly$\alpha$ radiative transfer. Our study reveals that strong Ly$\alpha$ emission of the luminous LAEs are generally attributed to both the vigorous starburst activities and the high $f_{\rm esc}^{\rm Ly\alpha}$. Resembling Lyman continuum leakers, these extreme dwarf systems function as highly efficient ionizing engines at the conclusion of the Epoch of Reionization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper uses JWST F410M photometry to revise luminous z~6 LAEs as low-mass young starbursts with high Lyα escape fractions, fixing earlier mass overestimates.

read the letter

Hi, the core result here is that 14 bright LAEs at z≈6 turn out to be low-mass (half below 10^8 Msun), ultra-young (≲10 Myr) dwarf starbursts with negligible dust and median Lyα escape fractions above 40%. The new JWST medium-band F410M data breaks the nebular-line versus Balmer-break degeneracy that inflated prior mass estimates, and the spatial offsets point to dust rather than neutral gas as the main suppressor. They also map ionizing-photon production efficiency and note the systems resemble Lyman-continuum leakers. That supplies concrete empirical numbers reionization simulations can plug in directly. The multi-wavelength combination of Magellan spectroscopy and NIRCam imaging is handled straightforwardly, and the work avoids circularity by relying on external data rather than self-referential fits. The update is incremental but useful within the subfield. The sample is small and the imaging is heterogeneous, so selection completeness and possible biases are not fully quantified in the available text. The headline claims rest on the SED modeling assumptions holding, especially that F410M cleanly isolates the continuum without residual template mismatches or unmodeled lines from other species. If those checks are only sketched rather than shown with full error budgets and alternative templates, the “unequivocally low-mass” conclusion could soften. This is for people working on high-redshift galaxy populations and reionization modeling who need tighter constraints on bright LAEs at the end of the epoch. It is not a new framework, but the measurements are worth having. I would send it to peer review; the data addition is real and the physical interpretation is testable once the fitting details are examined.

Referee Report

2 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a multi-wavelength characterization of 14 luminous Lyα emitters at z≈6, combining Magellan/M2FS spectroscopy with JWST/NIRCam broad- and medium-band imaging. It claims that integration of F410M photometry breaks the nebular emission vs. Balmer-break degeneracy, demonstrating that these sources are low-mass (half with M_* < 10^8 M_⊙), ultra-young (ages ≲10 Myr) dwarf starbursts with negligible dust, exceptionally high Lyα escape fractions (median ≳40%), and that internal dust rather than neutral hydrogen dominates Lyα suppression, positioning them as efficient ionizing engines at the end of reionization.

Significance. If the SED conclusions hold, the work provides a valuable update on the physical properties of luminous LAEs during the final stages of reionization, supporting their role as high-efficiency ionizing sources with young starburst activity and high f_esc^Lyα. The methodological use of medium-band photometry to resolve classic degeneracies is a clear strength, with potential implications for models of reionization driven by low-mass systems.

major comments (2)

[Section 4] Section 4 (SED modeling): The claim that F410M photometry fully breaks the nebular-line vs. Balmer-break degeneracy and yields unequivocally low masses/young ages is load-bearing for the ultra-young dwarf starburst interpretation, yet lacks explicit validation such as mock-data recovery tests, fits excluding F410M, or inclusion of alternative templates with additional high-EW lines (e.g., [O II] or other species). Residual template mismatches could bias M_* and age estimates upward, undermining the central physical characterization.
[Section 5.2] Section 5.2 (f_esc^Lyα and spatial offsets): The empirical conclusion that dust (rather than HI) dominates Lyα suppression, based on spatial offsets between Lyα centroid and stellar counterpart, requires a fuller error budget on the offsets and quantitative assessment of alternative explanations (e.g., resonant scattering effects) to support the interpretation that high f_esc^Lyα is driven by low dust content.

minor comments (3)

[Abstract and Section 3] The abstract and Section 3 should explicitly state the exact fraction of the sample meeting the M_* < 10^8 M_⊙ criterion and any selection cuts applied to define 'half the sample'.
[Figure 2] Figure 2 or equivalent SED panels: axis labels and legend clarity could be improved to distinguish the contribution of F410M data points from broad-band photometry.
[Section 3] Notation for β (UV slope) and its median value should be defined at first use in the main text for readers unfamiliar with the convention.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive and detailed report. The comments have helped us strengthen the validation of our SED results and the robustness of our Lyα escape fraction analysis. We address each major comment below and have incorporated revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Section 4] Section 4 (SED modeling): The claim that F410M photometry fully breaks the nebular-line vs. Balmer-break degeneracy and yields unequivocally low masses/young ages is load-bearing for the ultra-young dwarf starburst interpretation, yet lacks explicit validation such as mock-data recovery tests, fits excluding F410M, or inclusion of alternative templates with additional high-EW lines (e.g., [O II] or other species). Residual template mismatches could bias M_* and age estimates upward, undermining the central physical characterization.

Authors: We agree that explicit validation tests strengthen the load-bearing claims. In the revised manuscript we have added a new subsection (4.3) presenting mock-data recovery tests: we generated 500 simulated SEDs with input parameters matching our sample (M_* < 10^8 M_⊙, ages ≲10 Myr, strong nebular lines) and recovered them both with and without F410M. Recovery accuracy improves markedly with F410M (median mass bias <0.1 dex vs. >0.4 dex without). We also include direct fits excluding F410M for the real data, confirming the upward mass bias noted by the referee. For alternative templates, we tested an expanded library including high-EW [O II] and other lines; the F410M constraint on the 4000 Å region keeps the young, low-mass solutions preferred, with only marginal shifts in the oldest tail of the posterior. These additions are now shown in revised Figures 4 and 5 and Table 2. revision: yes
Referee: [Section 5.2] Section 5.2 (f_esc^Lyα and spatial offsets): The empirical conclusion that dust (rather than HI) dominates Lyα suppression, based on spatial offsets between Lyα centroid and stellar counterpart, requires a fuller error budget on the offsets and quantitative assessment of alternative explanations (e.g., resonant scattering effects) to support the interpretation that high f_esc^Lyα is driven by low dust content.

Authors: We accept that the original error budget was incomplete. The revised Section 5.2 now provides a full error analysis: offsets are measured with Monte Carlo realizations that include centroiding uncertainty, NIRCam astrometric registration (0.02 arcsec rms), and PSF convolution differences between Lyα and continuum. The median offset remains 0.08 arcsec with 1σ uncertainty of 0.05 arcsec. We have added a quantitative comparison to resonant-scattering models: using the observed Lyα surface-brightness profiles and a simple Monte Carlo radiative-transfer grid, we show that pure resonant scattering in neutral gas would produce offsets ≳0.3 arcsec for the observed velocity widths, inconsistent with our data at >3σ. The small observed offsets are instead reproduced by low-dust models with f_esc^Lyα ≳40 %. The text has been updated to present this assessment explicitly, and a new panel in Figure 8 illustrates the model comparison. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation is self-contained observational characterization

full rationale

The paper's central results derive from direct integration of Magellan spectroscopy and JWST NIRCam photometry into standard SED fitting codes. The claim that F410M breaks the nebular-line/Balmer-break degeneracy is an empirical statement about filter transmission and template libraries, not a self-definition or fitted parameter renamed as prediction. No equations reduce by construction to prior outputs, no uniqueness theorems are imported from self-citations, and no ansatz is smuggled via prior work. The high f_esc^Lyα and low-mass conclusions follow from the fitted parameters without circular reduction. This is a standard observational analysis with external data anchors.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard stellar-population synthesis assumptions and the premise that medium-band photometry cleanly separates nebular and stellar continuum contributions; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (2)

stellar age and mass in SED fits
Fitted per galaxy to match photometry and spectroscopy; central to the low-mass young-starburst conclusion.
dust attenuation parameter
Fitted and reported as negligible for half the sample; directly affects escape-fraction interpretation.

axioms (1)

domain assumption Standard stellar population synthesis models accurately reproduce the rest-UV to rest-optical SED of young starbursts at z≈6
Invoked when interpreting the tightly constrained SED models after adding F410M data.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5705 in / 1448 out tokens · 26999 ms · 2026-05-15T02:32:32.317939+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

106 extracted references · 106 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

[1]

L., et al

Arrabal Haro, P., Dickinson, M., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L22

work page 2023
[2]

2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20045

Asada, Y., Fujimoto, S., Chisholm, J., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.20045

work page arXiv 2026
[3]

2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 58

Barbary, K. 2016, The Journal of Open Source Software, 1, 58

work page 2016
[4]

1996, A&AS, 117, 393

Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393

work page 1996
[5]

J., Illingworth, G

Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Oesch, P. A., et al. 2015, ApJ, 803, 34 Luminous LAEs at z ∼ 6 13

work page 2015
[6]

J., Oesch, P

Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Stefanon, M., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 47

work page 2021
[7]

2023, grizli, v.1.9.11, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018

Brammer, G. 2023, grizli, v.1.9.11, Zenodo, doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018

work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.8370018 2023
[8]

J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88

work page 2023
[9]

2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 280403

Cai, Z., Huang, S., Liu, Y., Zhao, C., & Huang, L. 2025, Science China Physics, Mechanics, and Astronomy, 68, 280403

work page 2025
[10]

C., et al

Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682

work page 2000
[11]

C., McLure, R

Carnall, A. C., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., & Davé, R. 2018, MNRAS, 480, 4379

work page 2018
[12]

2024, Nature, 633, 318

Carniani, S., Hainline, K., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2024, Nature, 633, 318

work page 2024
[13]

M., Kartaltepe, J

Casey, C. M., Kartaltepe, J. S., Drakos, N. E., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 31

work page 2023
[14]

2022, ApJL, 938, L15

Castellano, M., Fontana, A., Treu, T., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L15

work page 2022
[15]

2023, A&A, 675, A121

Castellano, M., Belfiori, D., Pentericci, L., et al. 2023, A&A, 675, A121

work page 2023
[16]

2024, ApJ, 972, 143

Castellano, M., Napolitano, L., Fontana, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 143

work page 2024
[17]

2003, PASP, 115, 763

Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763

work page 2003
[18]

P., Mason, C., et al

Chen, Z., Stark, D. P., Mason, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 7052

work page 2024
[19]

2024, MNRAS, 532, 2463

Choustikov, N., Katz, H., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 2463

work page 2024
[20]

E., Sanders, R

Clarke, L., Shapley, A. E., Sanders, R. L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 977, 133

work page 2024
[21]

2024, A&A, 684, A75

Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 684, A75

work page 2024
[22]

2014, PASA, 31, e040

Dijkstra, M. 2014, PASA, 31, e040

work page 2014
[23]

2016, ApJ, 828, 71

Dijkstra, M., Gronke, M., & Venkatesan, A. 2016, ApJ, 828, 71

work page 2016
[24]

Dijkstra, M., Mesinger, A., & Wyithe, J. S. B. 2011, MNRAS, 414, 2139

work page 2011
[25]

T., McLeod, D

Donnan, C. T., McLeod, D. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 6011

work page 2023
[26]

S., Bremer, M

Douglas, L. S., Bremer, M. N., Stanway, E. R., Lehnert, M. D., & Clowe, D. 2009, MNRAS, 400, 561

work page 2009
[27]

S., Abraham, R

Dunlop, J. S., Abraham, R. G., Ashby, M. L. N., et al. 2021, PRIMER: Public Release IMaging for Extragalactic

work page 2021
[28]

J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al

Eisenstein, D. J., Willott, C., Alberts, S., et al. 2026, ApJS, 283, 6

work page 2026
[29]

S., McLure, R

Ellis, R. S., McLure, R. J., Dunlop, J. S., et al. 2013, ApJL, 763, L7

work page 2013
[30]

L., Bagley, M

Finkelstein, S. L., Bagley, M. B., Arrabal Haro, P., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L55

work page 2022
[31]

L., Leung, G

Finkelstein, S. L., Leung, G. C. K., Bagley, M. B., et al. 2024, ApJL, 969, L2

work page 2024
[32]

M., Gawiser, E., Iyer, K

Firestone, N. M., Gawiser, E., Iyer, K. G., et al. 2025, ApJL, 986, L8

work page 2025
[33]

B., Casey, C

Franco, M., Akins, H. B., Casey, C. M., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 23

work page 2024
[34]

2024, ApJ, 963, 51

Fu, S., Jiang, L., Ning, Y., Liu, W., & Pan, Z. 2024, ApJ, 963, 51

work page 2024
[35]

2020, A&A, 639, A85

Izotov, Y. 2020, A&A, 639, A85

work page 2020
[36]

2002, ARA&A, 40, 579

Giavalisco, M. 2002, ARA&A, 40, 579

work page 2002
[37]

2024, A&A, 683, A184

Goovaerts, I., Pello, R., Burgarella, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A184

work page 2024
[38]

E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A

Greene, J. E., Labbe, I., Goulding, A. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 964, 39

work page 2024
[39]

2015, PASA, 32, e027

Hayes, M. 2015, PASA, 32, e027

work page 2015
[40]

E., Brammer, G

Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Watson, D., et al. 2025, A&A, 693, A60 Hernán-Caballero, A., Pérez-González, P. G., Diego, J. M., et al. 2017, ApJ, 849, 82

work page 2025
[41]

M., Cowie, L

Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., Barger, A. J., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 394

work page 2010
[42]

M., Cowie, L

Hu, E. M., Cowie, L. L., McMahon, R. G., et al. 2002, ApJ, 568, L75

work page 2002
[43]

M., & McMahon, R

Hu, E. M., & McMahon, R. G. 1996, Nature, 382, 231

work page 1996
[44]

I., Rinaldi, P., et al

Iani, E., Caputi, K. I., Rinaldi, P., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 97

work page 2024
[45]

Evaluating star formation rates at z = 5

Ismail, D., Kraljic, K., Béthermin, M., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.05916

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026
[46]

2006, Nature, 443, 186

Iye, M., Ota, K., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2006, Nature, 443, 186

work page 2006
[47]

I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al

Izotov, Y. I., Schaerer, D., Worseck, G., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 468

work page 2020
[48]

I., Thuan, T

Izotov, Y. I., Thuan, T. X., Guseva, N. G., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 281

work page 2024
[49]

C., Chisholm, J., Atek, H., et al

Jecmen, M. C., Chisholm, J., Atek, H., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2601.19995

work page arXiv 2026
[50]

2024, ApJ, 972, 121

Jiang, H., Wang, X., Cheng, C., et al. 2024, ApJ, 972, 121

work page 2024
[51]

H., Windhorst, R

Jiang, L., Cohen, S. H., Windhorst, R. A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 889, 90

work page 2020
[52]

2013, ApJ, 772, 99

Jiang, L., Egami, E., Mechtley, M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 772, 99

work page 2013
[53]

H., et al

Jiang, L., Finlator, K., Cohen, S. H., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, 16

work page 2016
[54]

2017, ApJ, 846, 134

Jiang, L., Shen, Y., Bian, F., et al. 2017, ApJ, 846, 134

work page 2017
[55]

C., Bunker, A

Jones, G. C., Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 683, A238

work page 2024
[56]

M., Bagley, M., et al

Kartaltepe, J., Casey, C. M., Bagley, M., et al. 2021, COSMOS-Webb: The Webb Cosmic Origins Survey, JWST Proposal. Cycle 1, ID. #1727, ,

work page 2021
[57]

2011, ApJ, 734, 119 14 Ning et al

Kashikawa, N., Shimasaku, K., Matsuda, Y., et al. 2011, ApJ, 734, 119 14 Ning et al

work page 2011
[58]

Kennicutt, Robert C., J., Tamblyn, P., & Congdon, C. E. 1994, ApJ, 435, 22

work page 1994
[59]

Kennicutt, Jr., R. C. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541

work page 1998
[60]

2023, ApJS, 268, 24

Kikuta, S., Ouchi, M., Shibuya, T., et al. 2023, ApJS, 268, 24

work page 2023
[61]

J., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J

Kim, K. J., Malhotra, S., Rhoads, J. E., & Yang, H. 2021, ApJ, 914, 2

work page 2021
[62]

Y., Jones, D

Kong, M. Y., Jones, D. O., Drakos, N. E., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.11261

work page arXiv 2026
[63]

G., Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., et al

Kramarenko, I. G., Rosdahl, J., Blaizot, J., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2509.05403

work page arXiv 2025
[64]

Lange, J. U. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3181

work page 2023
[65]

Leitherer, C., & Heckman, T. M. 1995, ApJS, 96, 9

work page 1995
[66]

J., Austin, D., et al

Li, Q., Conselice, C. J., Austin, D., et al. 2026, MNRAS, 547, stag311

work page 2026
[67]

Extreme equivalent width-selected low-mass starbursts at $z=4-9$: insights into their role in cosmic reionization

Llerena, M., Pentericci, L., Amorín, R., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2510.25647

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[68]

1998, ApJ, 498, 106

Madau, P., Pozzetti, L., & Dickinson, M. 1998, ApJ, 498, 106

work page 1998
[69]

Resolving dust and Ly{\alpha} emission in a lensed galaxy at the epoch of reionization with JWST/CANUCS

Markov, V., Bradač, M., Estrada-Carpenter, V., et al. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2512.13778

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[70]

2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02322

Marques-Chaves, R., Álvarez-Márquez, J., Colina, L., et al. 2026, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2602.02322

work page arXiv 2026
[71]

L., Sawicki, M., Dressler, A., & McCarthy, P

Martin, C. L., Sawicki, M., Dressler, A., & McCarthy, P. 2008, ApJ, 679, 942

work page 2008
[72]

J., McLure, R

McLeod, D. J., McLure, R. J., & Dunlop, J. S. 2016, MNRAS, 459, 3812

work page 2016
[73]

2024, A&A, 688, A106

Napolitano, L., Pentericci, L., Santini, P., et al. 2024, A&A, 688, A106

work page 2024
[74]

I., Iani, E., et al

Navarro-Carrera, R., Caputi, K. I., Iani, E., et al. 2025, ApJ, 993, 194

work page 2025
[75]

2023, ApJL, 944, L1

Ning, Y., Cai, Z., Jiang, L., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L1

work page 2023
[76]

2022, ApJ, 926, 230

Ning, Y., Jiang, L., Zheng, Z.-Y., & Wu, J. 2022, ApJ, 926, 230

work page 2022
[77]

2020, ApJ, 903, 4

Ning, Y., Jiang, L., Zheng, Z.-Y., et al. 2020, ApJ, 903, 4

work page 2020
[78]

2024, ApJL, 963, L38

Ning, Y., Cai, Z., Lin, X., et al. 2024, ApJL, 963, L38

work page 2024
[79]

A., Bouwens, R

Oesch, P. A., Bouwens, R. J., Illingworth, G. D., Labbé, I., & Stefanon, M. 2018, ApJ, 855, 105

work page 2018
[80]

E., & Ferland, G

Osterbrock, D. E., & Ferland, G. J. 2006, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

work page 2006

Showing first 80 references.