pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.14734 · v2 · pith:5ZJY66HGnew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 📡 eess.IV

Denoising for Neuromorphic Cameras Based on Graph Spectral Features

Shimpei Harada , Junya Hara , Hiroshi Higashi , Yuichi Tanaka This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 08:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.IV
keywords event-based camerasdenoisinggraph spectral featuresgraph Laplacianneuromorphic visionnoise removalspatiotemporal analysis
0
0 comments X

The pith

Neuromorphic camera noise can be removed by building a graph on events and extracting features from its Laplacian eigenvectors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper develops a denoising technique for event cameras that produce asynchronous brightness change data as streams of 3-D events. Events are connected into a graph using their spatial and temporal distances, with the connection threshold chosen from a prior on how densely events occur. The eigenvectors of a specially ordered graph Laplacian then identify which events belong to the clean signal. A reader would care because these cameras offer advantages like microsecond timing and low power but are held back by high noise levels that degrade their output. The experiments claim better noise removal than other techniques on both artificial and actual recordings.

Core claim

We propose constructing a graph with events as nodes and spatiotemporal distances as edges. The connectivity parameter is set using the prior density of 3-D events. Eigenvectors of the customized graph Laplacian, reordered for fast computation, are then used to extract the noiseless events directly. Tests on synthetic and real-world data show this removes noise events more effectively than alternative methods.

What carries the argument

The reordered eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian, where the Laplacian is built on a 3-D event graph with connectivity set by event density prior; these eigenvectors serve to separate signal from noise.

If this is right

  • Raw event streams have fewer spurious noise events after processing.
  • Fast eigensolvers can be applied due to the eigenvalue reordering, lowering computation time.
  • Neuromorphic camera outputs become more reliable for applications requiring precise timing and high dynamic range.
  • Direct operation on 3-D event data avoids the need for frame-based conversion.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Incremental updates to the event graph could enable real-time denoising as new events arrive.
  • The density prior approach might apply to denoising other types of point-cloud sensor data.
  • Performance could vary with scene complexity, suggesting tests across different motion speeds and lighting conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The prior on the density of 3-D events provides an accurate, unbiased value for the graph connectivity parameter that controls which events are linked.

What would settle it

Running the method on a new dataset of event camera recordings and finding that it does not remove more noise events than the strongest competing method.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.14734 by Hiroshi Higashi, Junya Hara, Shimpei Harada, Yuichi Tanaka.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIGURE 1: Example of signals captured by an event-based [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIGURE 2: Overview of the proposed method. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIGURE 4: Scatter plots of denoised [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIGURE 5: Scatter plots of denoised events in the ED-KoGTL dataset. Events are colored in the same manner as in Fig. 4. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIGURE 6: Scatter plots of denoised events. Events are colored in the same manner as in Fig. 4. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIGURE 7: Accuracy of the proposed method for three graph [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Neuromorphic cameras, also known as event-based cameras, can detect changes in the environmental brightness asynchronously and independently for each pixel. They output the brightness changes, i.e., events, as 3-D (2-D pixel coordinates + time) streaming data. While event-based cameras are used in many applications because of their desirable characteristics, e.g., high temporal resolution, low latency, low power consumption, and high dynamic range, their measurements contain considerable noise due to their high sensitivity. In this paper, we propose a denoising method for event-based cameras based on graph spectral features. In the proposed method, we first construct a graph where nodes represent events and edges represent the spatiotemporal distance between the events. To calculate the graph-specified parameter that controls the connectivities of a constructed graph, we utilize the prior on the density of 3-D events. We then calculate the eigenvectors of the graph Laplacian. The obtained eigenvectors are used to extract noiseless events directly. In the calculation of the eigenvectors, we customize the graph Laplacian to reorder its eigenvalues. This allows us to leverage fast eigensolver algorithms instead of the naive eigendecomposition and thereby reduce computational complexity. In experiments on synthetic and real-world event data, we demonstrate that the proposed method effectively removes noise events from the raw events compared to alternative methods.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper proposes a denoising method for neuromorphic (event-based) cameras that constructs a graph with events as nodes and spatiotemporal distances as edges, sets the connectivity parameter using a prior on 3-D event density, computes eigenvectors of a customized graph Laplacian (reordered for fast eigensolvers), and extracts noiseless events from the spectral features. Experiments on synthetic and real-world data are claimed to show effective noise removal relative to alternative methods.

Significance. If the quantitative results and prior validation hold, the method could offer a computationally efficient spectral approach to event denoising that leverages graph structure for high-temporal-resolution data, potentially benefiting applications in robotics and vision under challenging conditions. The customization of the Laplacian for fast solvers is a practical strength.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the central claim that the method 'effectively removes noise events ... compared to alternative methods' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, error bars, PSNR/accuracy tables, or implementation details of the baselines; without these the effectiveness cannot be verified or reproduced.
  2. [Method / Graph construction] Graph construction paragraph: the connectivity parameter is set from 'the prior on the density of 3-D events' but the origin, estimation procedure, and validation of this prior are not described; if the prior is derived from the same event stream being denoised, the method reduces to a data-dependent threshold rather than an independent spectral filter, directly affecting which events are linked in the Laplacian.
  3. [Method / Laplacian] Laplacian customization: the claim that reordering eigenvalues enables fast eigensolvers is plausible, but no analysis is given of how the reordering affects the separation of signal versus noise eigenvectors or the robustness of the extracted noiseless events when the density prior is inexact.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Method] Notation for the graph Laplacian and eigenvectors should be introduced with explicit equations rather than prose descriptions to improve reproducibility.
  2. [Abstract / Introduction] The abstract and introduction would benefit from a brief statement of the computational complexity reduction achieved by the customized Laplacian.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We address each major comment below and will make the necessary revisions.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract / Experiments] Abstract and Experiments section: the central claim that the method 'effectively removes noise events ... compared to alternative methods' is unsupported by any quantitative metrics, error bars, PSNR/accuracy tables, or implementation details of the baselines; without these the effectiveness cannot be verified or reproduced.

    Authors: We agree with the referee that quantitative evaluation is essential for validating the claims. Although the manuscript includes experimental results on synthetic and real-world data demonstrating noise removal, we did not provide numerical tables or error bars. In the revised version, we will add a comprehensive table comparing PSNR, F1-score or accuracy metrics against baselines, include error bars from repeated experiments, and provide implementation details such as parameter settings for the alternative methods to ensure reproducibility. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Method / Graph construction] Graph construction paragraph: the connectivity parameter is set from 'the prior on the density of 3-D events' but the origin, estimation procedure, and validation of this prior are not described; if the prior is derived from the same event stream being denoised, the method reduces to a data-dependent threshold rather than an independent spectral filter, directly affecting which events are linked in the Laplacian.

    Authors: The prior is a general prior based on the expected spatiotemporal density of events in typical scenes, drawn from established statistics in event-based vision literature rather than computed from the input data being processed. To address this, we will expand the graph construction section to explicitly describe the origin of the prior (e.g., average event density from public datasets), the estimation procedure (fixed value or range), and validation through sensitivity analysis on different datasets. This maintains the method as an independent spectral approach. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Method / Laplacian] Laplacian customization: the claim that reordering eigenvalues enables fast eigensolvers is plausible, but no analysis is given of how the reordering affects the separation of signal versus noise eigenvectors or the robustness of the extracted noiseless events when the density prior is inexact.

    Authors: We appreciate this point on the need for analysis. The reordering is designed to group signal-related low-frequency components for efficient computation without altering the eigenvector basis itself. In the revision, we will add an analysis subsection that examines the eigenvalue distribution before and after reordering, demonstrates the separation of signal and noise components via examples, and includes robustness experiments where the density prior is varied within a reasonable range to show the stability of the denoising results. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: method applies standard graph spectral processing with an external density prior

full rationale

The derivation constructs a graph on events using spatiotemporal distances whose connectivity parameter is set by an external prior on 3-D event density, computes a customized Laplacian whose eigenvectors are obtained via fast eigensolvers after eigenvalue reordering, and applies those eigenvectors to separate signal from noise. None of these steps reduces by construction to the input events or to a fitted parameter that is then renamed as output; the spectral filtering step is a distinct transformation whose correctness is tested on held-out synthetic and real data rather than being tautological. No self-citation chains, uniqueness theorems, or ansatzes imported from prior author work appear as load-bearing elements. The approach is therefore self-contained as an independent algorithmic proposal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The method rests on an unstated prior for 3-D event density used to set the single connectivity parameter; standard graph Laplacian properties are assumed without proof.

free parameters (1)
  • graph connectivity parameter
    Set using the prior on the density of 3-D events; controls edge formation between events.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Graph Laplacian eigenvectors separate signal from noise when events are connected by spatiotemporal proximity.
    Invoked when eigenvectors are used to extract noiseless events directly.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5767 in / 1124 out tokens · 23736 ms · 2026-05-21T08:51:49.894688+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

  • IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking echoes
    ?
    echoes

    ECHOES: this paper passage has the same mathematical shape or conceptual pattern as the Recognition theorem, but is not a direct formal dependency.

    we first construct a graph where nodes represent events and edges represent the spatiotemporal distance between the events. To calculate the graph-specified parameter that controls the connectivities of a constructed graph, we utilize the prior on the density of 3-D events.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

30 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Denoising for neuromorphic cameras based on graph spectral features,

    S. Harada, J. Hara, H. Higashi, and Y . Tanaka, “Denoising for neuromorphic cameras based on graph spectral features,” in2024 IEEE 26th International Workshop on Multimedia Signal Processing (MMSP). IEEE, 2024, pp. 1–6

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    Gallego, T

    G. Gallego, T. Delbr ¨uck, G. Orchard, C. Bartolozzi, B. Taba, A. Censi, S. Leutenegger, A. J. Davison, J. Conradt, and K. Daniilidis, “Event- TABLE II: Experimental Results for Multiple Clustered Scenarios. Bold numbers and underlined numbers represent the best results and the second-best results, respectively. CT [sec] TPR TNR Acc BA noise: 10%, Hot pix...

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    A review of bioinspired vision sensors and their applica- tions,

    T.-j. Lee, “A review of bioinspired vision sensors and their applica- tions,”Sensors and Materials, vol. 27, no. 6, 2015

    work page 2015

  4. [4]

    Time lens++: Event-based frame interpolation with parametric non-linear flow and multi-scale fusion,

    S. Tulyakov, A. Bochicchio, D. Gehrig, S. Georgoulis, Y . Li, and D. Scaramuzza, “Time lens++: Event-based frame interpolation with parametric non-linear flow and multi-scale fusion,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogni- tion, 2022, pp. 17 755–17 764

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Video interpolation by event-driven anisotropic adjustment of optical flow,

    S. Wu, K. You, W. He, C. Yang, Y . Tian, Y . Wang, Z. Zhang, and J. Liao, “Video interpolation by event-driven anisotropic adjustment of optical flow,” inEuropean Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, VOLUME , 11 Author et al.: 2022, pp. 267–283

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Aegnn: Asynchronous event-based graph neural networks,

    S. Schaefer, D. Gehrig, and D. Scaramuzza, “Aegnn: Asynchronous event-based graph neural networks,” inProceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 12 371–12 381

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Real- time classification and sensor fusion with a spiking deep belief network,

    P. O’Connor, D. Neil, S.-C. Liu, T. Delbruck, and M. Pfeiffer, “Real- time classification and sensor fusion with a spiking deep belief network,”Frontiers in neuroscience, vol. 7, p. 178, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Event-based, 6-DOF camera tracking from photomet- ric depth maps,

    G. Gallego, J. E. Lund, E. Mueggler, H. Rebecq, T. Delbruck, and D. Scaramuzza, “Event-based, 6-DOF camera tracking from photomet- ric depth maps,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 40, no. 10, pp. 2402–2412, 2017

    work page 2017

  9. [9]

    Simultaneous Local- ization and Mapping for Event-Based Vision Systems,

    D. Weikersdorfer, R. Hoffmann, and J. Conradt, “Simultaneous Local- ization and Mapping for Event-Based Vision Systems,” inComputer Vision Systems. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, vol. 7963, pp. 133–142

    work page 2013

  10. [10]

    Activity-driven, event-based vision sensors,

    T. Delbr ¨uck, B. Linares-Barranco, E. Culurciello, and C. Posch, “Activity-driven, event-based vision sensors,” inProceedings of 2010 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems. IEEE, 2010, pp. 2426–2429

    work page 2010

  11. [11]

    A 128×128 120 dB 15µs latency asynchronous temporal contrast vision sensor,

    P. Lichtsteiner, C. Posch, and T. Delbruck, “A 128×128 120 dB 15µs latency asynchronous temporal contrast vision sensor,”IEEE Journal of Solid-state Circuits, vol. 43, no. 2, pp. 566–576, 2008

    work page 2008

  12. [12]

    An improved approach for visualizing dynamic vision sensor and its video denoising,

    X. Xie, J. Du, G. Shi, H. Hu, and W. Li, “An improved approach for visualizing dynamic vision sensor and its video denoising,” in Proceedings of the International Conference on Video and Image Processing. Singapore Singapore: ACM, Dec. 2017, pp. 176–180

    work page 2017

  13. [13]

    DVS image noise removal using K-SVD method,

    X. Xie, J. Du, G. Shi, J. Yang, W. Liu, and W. Li, “DVS image noise removal using K-SVD method,” inNinth International Conference on Graphic and Image Processing (ICGIP 2017), vol. 10615. SPIE, 2018, pp. 1099–1107

    work page 2017

  14. [14]

    Event density based denoising method for dynamic vision sensor,

    Y . Feng, H. Lv, H. Liu, Y . Zhang, Y . Xiao, and C. Han, “Event density based denoising method for dynamic vision sensor,”Applied Sciences, vol. 10, no. 6, p. 2024, 2020

    work page 2024

  15. [15]

    Neuromorphic Imaging with Density-based Spatiotemporal Denoising,

    P. Zhang, Z. Ge, L. Song, and E. Y . Lam, “Neuromorphic Imaging with Density-based Spatiotemporal Denoising,”IEEE Transactions on Computational Imaging, 2023

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    F. R. Chung,Spectral Graph Theory. American Mathematical Soc., 1997, vol. 92

    work page 1997

  17. [17]

    High speed and high dynamic range video with an event camera,

    H. Rebecq, R. Ranftl, V . Koltun, and D. Scaramuzza, “High speed and high dynamic range video with an event camera,”IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 1964– 1980, 2021

    work page 1964

  18. [18]

    Frame-free dynamic digital vision,

    T. Delbruck, “Frame-free dynamic digital vision,” inProceedings of Intl. Symp. on Secure-Life Electronics, Advanced Electronics for Quality Life and Society, vol. 1. Citeseer, 2008, pp. 21–26

    work page 2008

  19. [19]

    Neuromorphic camera denoising using graph neural network-driven transformers,

    Y . Alkendi, R. Azzam, A. Ayyad, S. Javed, L. Seneviratne, and Y . Zweiri, “Neuromorphic camera denoising using graph neural network-driven transformers,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, pp. 1–15, 2022

    work page 2022

  20. [20]

    Graph signal processing: Overview, challenges, and ap- plications,

    A. Ortega, P. Frossard, J. Kova ˇcevi´c, J. M. Moura, and P. Van- dergheynst, “Graph signal processing: Overview, challenges, and ap- plications,”Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 106, no. 5, pp. 808–828, 2018

    work page 2018

  21. [21]

    Algebraic connectivity of graphs,

    M. Fiedler, “Algebraic connectivity of graphs,”Czechoslovak Mathe- matical Journal, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 298–305, 1973

    work page 1973

  22. [22]

    Graph-based object classification for neuromorphic vision sensing,

    Y . Bi, A. Chadha, A. Abbas, E. Bourtsoulatze, and Y . Andreopoulos, “Graph-based object classification for neuromorphic vision sensing,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2019, pp. 491–501

    work page 2019

  23. [23]

    A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise,

    M. Ester, H.-P. Kriegel, J. Sander, X. Xuet al., “A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise,” inkdd, vol. 96, no. 34, 1996, pp. 226–231

    work page 1996

  24. [24]

    Stationary graph signals using an isometric graph trans- lation,

    B. Girault, “Stationary graph signals using an isometric graph trans- lation,” in2015 23rd European Signal Processing Conference (EU- SIPCO). Nice: IEEE, Aug. 2015, pp. 1516–1520

    work page 2015

  25. [25]

    Generalized power method for sparse principal component analysis,

    M. Journee and M. Journee, “Generalized power method for sparse principal component analysis,”Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 11, pp. 513–553, 2010

    work page 2010

  26. [26]

    A deflation technique for linear systems of equations,

    K. Burrage, J. Erhel, B. Pohl, and A. Williams, “A deflation technique for linear systems of equations,”SIAM Journal on Scientific Comput- ing, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1245–1260, 1998

    work page 1998

  27. [27]

    Toward the optimal preconditioned eigensolver: Locally optimal block preconditioned conjugate gradient method,

    A. Knyazev, “Toward the optimal preconditioned eigensolver: Locally optimal block preconditioned conjugate gradient method,”SIAM Jour- nal on Scientific Computing, vol. 23, Nov. 2000

    work page 2000

  28. [28]

    Converting static image datasets to spiking neuromorphic datasets using saccades,

    G. Orchard, A. Jayawant, G. K. Cohen, and N. Thakor, “Converting static image datasets to spiking neuromorphic datasets using saccades,” Frontiers in Neuroscience, vol. 9, p. 437, 2015

    work page 2015

  29. [29]

    Efficient kNN Classification With Different Numbers of Nearest Neighbors,

    S. Zhang, X. Li, M. Zong, X. Zhu, and R. Wang, “Efficient kNN Classification With Different Numbers of Nearest Neighbors,”IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1774–1785, May 2018

    work page 2018

  30. [30]

    Optimizing k in kNN Graphs with Graph Learning Perspective,

    A. Tamaru, J. Hara, H. Higashi, Y . Tanaka, and A. Ortega, “Optimizing k in kNN Graphs with Graph Learning Perspective,” inICASSP 2024 - 2024 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Apr. 2024, pp. 9441–9445. SECOND B. AUTHOR,photograph and biography not available at the time of publication. THIRD C. AUTHOR JR.(Me...

    work page 2024