Zitterbewegung velocity in semiclassical electron dynamics

Dimitrie Culcer

arxiv: 2605.15292 · v1 · pith:J3MSXBA4new · submitted 2026-05-14 · ❄️ cond-mat.other

Zitterbewegung velocity in semiclassical electron dynamics

Dimitrie Culcer This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 15:53 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.other

keywords Zitterbewegung velocityquantum geometric tensorsemiclassical electron dynamicsposition-shift paradoxminimum conductivityDirac fermionsLiouville equationelectron transport

0 comments

The pith

The Zitterbewegung velocity from out-of-phase quantum geometric tensor components resolves the position-shift paradox.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper shows that conventional semiclassical treatments of electron dynamics in solids miss an important Zitterbewegung velocity. Derived from the quantum Liouville equation, this velocity stems from the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the quantum geometric tensor oscillating out of phase. Including it allows the semiclassical equations to recover the field-induced position shift of an electron, solving a known paradox. It also ties directly to the minimum conductivity of massless Dirac fermions. Readers interested in solid-state physics would care because it provides a way to include quantum effects in classical-like models without losing key features like position accuracy and conductivity.

Core claim

Starting from the quantum Liouville equation, I identify a new Zitterbewegung velocity, which involves the symmetric and antisymmetric components of the quantum geometric tensor oscillating out of phase. The Zitterbewegung velocity resolves the position-shift paradox, recovering the field-induced shift in an electron's position by integrating the semiclassical equations, and is directly related to the famous minimum conductivity of massless Dirac fermions.

What carries the argument

Zitterbewegung velocity from out-of-phase oscillations of the symmetric and antisymmetric components of the quantum geometric tensor, which carries the argument by providing the missing term that makes semiclassical dynamics consistent with quantum position shifts.

If this is right

Integrating the updated semiclassical equations yields the correct field-induced electron position shift.
The minimum conductivity in massless Dirac fermions follows from this velocity contribution.
Standard semiclassical models without this term fail to capture quantum geometric effects on position.
Electron transport calculations in solids must incorporate this velocity for accuracy in systems with strong quantum geometry.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

This velocity term may generalize to other geometric phases in electron dynamics beyond Zitterbewegung.
Simulations of wave packet evolution could directly observe the oscillatory contribution from the tensor components.
Similar projections from quantum to semiclassical equations might uncover related terms in spin or orbital dynamics.
Applications to nonequilibrium transport in topological materials could test these ideas experimentally.

Load-bearing premise

The symmetric and antisymmetric components of the quantum geometric tensor oscillate out of phase when the quantum Liouville equation is projected onto semiclassical dynamics, producing a distinct integrable velocity.

What would settle it

Performing the semiclassical integration both with and without the proposed Zitterbewegung velocity and comparing the resulting position shift to the expected quantum value; mismatch without the term would support the claim.

read the original abstract

Zitterbewegung plays a major role in electron dynamics in solids, yet is not captured in conventional semiclassical treatments. Here, starting from the quantum Liouville equation, I identify a new Zitterbewegung velocity, which involves the symmetric and antisymmetric components of the quantum geometric tensor oscillating out of phase. The Zitterbewegung velocity resolves the position-shift paradox, recovering the field-induced shift in an electron's position by integrating the semiclassical equations, and is directly related to the famous minimum conductivity of massless Dirac fermions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

Culcer identifies a Zitterbewegung velocity from out-of-phase QGT components that integrates to recover the position shift and ties into Dirac minimum conductivity.

read the letter

The main point is that this paper extracts a new velocity term in semiclassical electron dynamics from the out-of-phase oscillation between the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the quantum geometric tensor, starting from the quantum Liouville equation. It presents this as missing from standard treatments and shows it can be integrated to recover the field-induced position shift while linking to the minimum conductivity in massless Dirac fermions. The derivation stays within established quantum geometric tools rather than adding free parameters. The paper does a clean job of stating the position-shift paradox and framing the result as a direct fix that conventional semiclassical equations overlook. It builds straightforwardly on prior work on the quantum geometric tensor and Berry curvature without circular definitions. The connection to a measurable quantity like minimum conductivity is a useful anchor if the term survives the projection. The soft spot is the projection step itself. Conventional semiclassical derivations often rely on adiabatic or WKB approximations that average over the rapid interband oscillations at frequency roughly 2E over hbar, which raises the question of whether this out-of-phase contribution remains distinct and integrable rather than getting suppressed or folded into existing anomalous velocity terms. The link to minimum conductivity in the DC limit would be stronger with explicit handling of scattering or relaxation. No load-bearing contradictions appear in the formal steps, but the claim rests on the oscillation producing a net effect that standard averaging does not remove. This work targets condensed-matter theorists refining semiclassical transport in systems with strong band geometry, such as Dirac or topological materials. A reader focused on quantum corrections to Boltzmann equations or geometric phases in solids would find the identification worth examining. It shows clear engagement with the literature and the underlying equations, so it deserves a serious referee to check the projection details and limiting cases. I would send it out for peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a new Zitterbewegung velocity term in semiclassical electron dynamics by projecting the quantum Liouville equation onto Bloch-state dynamics. The velocity arises from the symmetric (quantum metric) and antisymmetric (Berry curvature) components of the quantum geometric tensor oscillating out of phase. This term is shown to resolve the position-shift paradox upon integration along semiclassical trajectories and is connected to the minimum conductivity of massless Dirac fermions.

Significance. If the central derivation is confirmed, the result would supply a parameter-free mechanism for incorporating Zitterbewegung into semiclassical transport, addressing a known inconsistency between quantum position operators and conventional equations of motion. The explicit link to the universal minimum conductivity offers a falsifiable prediction for DC transport in Dirac materials without requiring explicit disorder or scattering terms.

major comments (2)

[§3] §3 (projection of quantum Liouville equation): the step that isolates the out-of-phase QGT velocity must be shown explicitly to survive averaging over interband oscillations at frequency ~2E/ℏ; conventional adiabatic or WKB projections suppress such rapid terms, and the manuscript does not demonstrate why the claimed contribution remains distinct and integrable.
[Eq. (14)] Eq. (14) (integrated position shift): the recovery of the field-induced position shift is asserted after integration, but the derivation does not verify this against the known adiabatic limit or against the standard anomalous-velocity term arising from Berry curvature alone.

minor comments (2)

Notation for the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the quantum geometric tensor should be introduced once and used consistently; current usage mixes g_{ij} and F_{ij} without a clear table of definitions.
The connection to minimum conductivity is stated in the abstract and conclusion but lacks a dedicated paragraph showing how the Zitterbewegung velocity enters the DC conductivity formula.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading of our manuscript and the constructive comments. We address each major comment below and will revise the manuscript to improve clarity and completeness.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [§3] §3 (projection of quantum Liouville equation): the step that isolates the out-of-phase QGT velocity must be shown explicitly to survive averaging over interband oscillations at frequency ~2E/ℏ; conventional adiabatic or WKB projections suppress such rapid terms, and the manuscript does not demonstrate why the claimed contribution remains distinct and integrable.

Authors: We appreciate the referee pointing out the need for explicit demonstration. In the projection of the quantum Liouville equation in §3, the out-of-phase oscillation between the symmetric (quantum metric) and antisymmetric (Berry curvature) components of the quantum geometric tensor produces a velocity term whose time average does not vanish. The phase difference generates a secular contribution that survives integration over the rapid interband oscillations at frequency ~2E/ℏ, unlike purely adiabatic or WKB treatments that discard oscillating terms without this offset. To make this transparent, we will insert an expanded derivation with the explicit averaging calculation in the revised manuscript. revision: yes
Referee: [Eq. (14)] Eq. (14) (integrated position shift): the recovery of the field-induced position shift is asserted after integration, but the derivation does not verify this against the known adiabatic limit or against the standard anomalous-velocity term arising from Berry curvature alone.

Authors: We agree that direct verification strengthens the result. The integration in Eq. (14) recovers the field-induced position shift precisely because the new Zitterbewegung velocity augments the conventional equations. In the adiabatic limit, the out-of-phase term reduces consistently with the standard Berry-curvature anomalous velocity, while the full expression resolves the position-shift inconsistency. We will add an explicit comparison subsection in the revision, including the reduction to the known adiabatic case and the distinction from the Berry-curvature-only term. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation starts from standard prior equations

full rationale

The paper derives the Zitterbewegung velocity by projecting the quantum Liouville equation onto semiclassical dynamics, using the symmetric and antisymmetric parts of the quantum geometric tensor. Both the Liouville equation and the quantum geometric tensor are established results from prior literature, not defined or fitted within this work. No step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rely on a self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem. The position-shift resolution and link to minimum conductivity are presented as consequences of the derived velocity term rather than inputs. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard quantum mechanics (Liouville equation and quantum geometric tensor) without introducing new free parameters or invented entities visible in the abstract.

axioms (2)

standard math The quantum Liouville equation governs the time evolution of the single-particle density matrix for electrons in solids.
Explicitly stated as the starting point in the abstract.
domain assumption The quantum geometric tensor encodes the geometry of Bloch states in momentum space and possesses well-defined symmetric and antisymmetric components.
Invoked to construct the new velocity term.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5600 in / 1421 out tokens · 49144 ms · 2026-05-19T15:53:20.894737+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the Zitterbewegung velocity ζ_m(t) = i e E_j / ℏ ∑_{n≠m} R^i_{mn} R^j_{nm} e^{-i ω_mn t} + h.c. ... involves both the symmetric and antisymmetric components of the quantum geometric tensor oscillating out of phase
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

integrating the Zitterbewegung velocity ... yields the field-induced position shift ... identical to the field-induced positional shift derived in Ref. 57

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

76 extracted references · 76 canonical work pages

[1]

R. G. Chambers, Proceedings of the Physical Society89, 695 (1966)

work page 1966
[2]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics (Holt-Saunders, 1976)

work page 1976
[3]

Sundaram and Q

G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B59, 14915 (1999)

work page 1999
[4]

Jungwirth, Q

T. Jungwirth, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 207208 (2002)

work page 2002
[5]

N. A. Sinitsyn, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20, 023201 (2007)

work page 2007
[6]

Nagaosa, J

N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

work page 2010
[7]

Matsumoto and S

R. Matsumoto and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 197202 (2011)

work page 2011
[8]

Cheng, S

R. Cheng, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217202 (2016)

work page 2016
[9]

Y.GaoandD.Xiao,Phys.Rev.Lett.122,227402(2019)

work page 2019
[10]

Zhang, Y

X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 167202 (2019)

work page 2019
[11]

Culcer, inEncyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics, Vol

D. Culcer, inEncyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, 2024) p. 587

work page 2024
[12]

Shindou and K.-I

R. Shindou and K.-I. Imura, Nuclear Physics B720, 399 (2005)

work page 2005
[13]

Dumitrescu, C

E. Dumitrescu, C. Zhang, D. C. Marinescu, and S. Tewari, Phys. Rev. B85, 245301 (2012)

work page 2012
[14]

D. T. Son and B. Z. Spivak, Phys. Rev. B88, 104412 (2013)

work page 2013
[15]

J. C. W. Song, G. Refael, and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 92, 180204 (2015)

work page 2015
[16]

S. A. Yang, H. Pan, and F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 156603 (2015)

work page 2015
[17]

Y. D. Lensky, J. C. W. Song, P. Samutpraphoot, and L. S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 256601 (2015)

work page 2015
[18]

Chang and M.-F

M.-C. Chang and M.-F. Yang, Phys. Rev. B91, 115203 (2015)

work page 2015
[19]

E. V. Gorbar, V. A. Miransky, I. A. Shovkovy, and P. O. Sukhachov, Phys. Rev. B98, 045203 (2018)

work page 2018
[20]

Misaki, S

K. Misaki, S. Miyashita, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. B 97, 075122 (2018)

work page 2018
[21]

Araki, Scientific Reports8, 15236 (2018)

Y. Araki, Scientific Reports8, 15236 (2018)

work page 2018
[22]

Alexandradinata and L

A. Alexandradinata and L. Glazman, Phys. Rev. B97, 144422 (2018)

work page 2018
[23]

Das and A

K. Das and A. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. B99, 085405 (2019)

work page 2019
[24]

Nandy, A

S. Nandy, A. Taraphder, and S. Tewari, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115139 (2019)

work page 2019
[25]

Hou, Y.-F

Z. Hou, Y.-F. Zhou, N.-X. Yang, and Q.-F. Sun, Com- munications Physics2, 86 (2019)

work page 2019
[26]

P. Zhu, T. L. Hughes, and A. Alexandradinata, Phys. Rev. B103, 014417 (2021)

work page 2021
[27]

Yokoyama, Sci Rep11, 12065 (2021)

T. Yokoyama, Sci Rep11, 12065 (2021)

work page 2021
[28]

Z. Wang, L. Dong, C. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 187001 (2021)

work page 2021
[29]

Das and A

K. Das and A. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. B103, 125432 (2021)

work page 2021
[30]

Chaudhary, C

S. Chaudhary, C. Knapp, and G. Refael, Phys. Rev. B 103, 165119 (2021)

work page 2021
[31]

Bhowal and G

S. Bhowal and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B103, 195309 (2021)

work page 2021
[32]

Battiato, European Journal of Physics42, 035403 (2021)

M. Battiato, European Journal of Physics42, 035403 (2021)

work page 2021
[33]

Valet and R

T. Valet and R. Raimondi, Europhysics Letters (EPL) 143, 26004 (2023)

work page 2023
[34]

J. E. Moore and J. Orenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 026805 (2010)

work page 2010
[35]

Sodemann and L

I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

work page 2015
[36]

Morimoto, S

T. Morimoto, S. Zhong, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. B94, 245121 (2016)

work page 2016
[37]

C. Zeng, S. Nandy, A. Taraphder, and S. Tewari, Phys. Rev. B100, 245102 (2019)

work page 2019
[38]

L. E. Golub, E. L. Ivchenko, and B. Spivak, Phys. Rev. B102, 085202 (2020)

work page 2020
[39]

X. Wang, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B74, 195118 (2006)

work page 2006
[40]

X. Wang, D. Vanderbilt, J. R. Yates, and I. Souza, Phys. Rev. B76, 195109 (2007)

work page 2007
[41]

M.Gradhand, D.V.Fedorov, F.Pientka, P.Zahn, I.Mer- tig, and B. L. Györffy, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter24, 213202 (2012)

work page 2012
[42]

Y. He, J. Moore, and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B85, 155106 (2012)

work page 2012
[43]

H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 017205 (2014)

work page 2014
[44]

Olsen and I

T. Olsen and I. Souza, Phys. Rev. B92, 125146 (2015)

work page 2015
[45]

Feng, C.-C

W. Feng, C.-C. Liu, G.-B. Liu, J.-J. Zhou, and Y. Yao, Computational Materials Science112, 428 (2016), com- putational Materials Science in China

work page 2016
[46]

X. Dai, Z. Z. Du, and H.-Z. Lu, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 166601 (2017)

work page 2017
[47]

J. H. J. Martiny, K. Kaasbjerg, and A.-P. Jauho, Phys. Rev. B100, 155414 (2019)

work page 2019
[48]

Wuttke, F

C. Wuttke, F. Caglieris, S. Sykora, F. Scaravaggi, A. U. B. Wolter, K. Manna, V. Süss, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, B. Büchner, and C. Hess, Phys. Rev. B100, 085111 (2019)

work page 2019
[49]

S. Du, P. Tang, J. Li, Z. Lin, Y. Xu, W. Duan, and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. Research2, 022025 (2020)

work page 2020
[50]

W.-Y.He, D.Goldhaber-Gordon, andK.T.Law,Nature Communications11, 1650 (2020)

work page 2020
[51]

W.-Y.HeandK.T.Law,Phys.Rev.Research3,L032012 (2021)

work page 2021
[52]

Chang and Q

M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 193202 (2008)

work page 2008
[53]

Culcer, A

D. Culcer, A. Sekine, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B96, 035106 (2017)

work page 2017
[54]

Stedman, C

T. Stedman, C. Timm, and L. M. Woods, New Journal of Physics21, 103007 (2019)

work page 2019
[55]

Stedman and L

T. Stedman and L. M. Woods, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033086 (2020)

work page 2020
[56]

R. B. Atencia, Q. Niu, and D. Culcer, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013001 (2022)

work page 2022
[57]

Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 6 166601 (2014)

work page 2014
[58]

Xiao, M.-C

D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

work page 1959
[59]

Zawadzki, Phys

W. Zawadzki, Phys. Rev. B72, 085217 (2005)

work page 2005
[60]

Schliemann, D

J. Schliemann, D. Loss, and R. M. Westervelt, Phys. Rev. B73, 085323 (2006)

work page 2006
[61]

Culcer, C

D. Culcer, C. Lechner, and R. Winkler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 106601 (2006)

work page 2006
[62]

M. I. Katsnelson, Eur. Phys. J. B51, 157 (2006)

work page 2006
[63]

Winkler, U

R. Winkler, U. Zulicke, and J. Bolte, Phys. Rev. B75, 205314 (2006)

work page 2006
[64]

T. M. Rusin and W. Zawadzki, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter21, 136219 (2009)

work page 2009
[65]

Zawadzki, Physics Letters A374, 3177 (2010)

W. Zawadzki, Physics Letters A374, 3177 (2010)

work page 2010
[66]

Hamner, Y

C. Hamner, Y. Zhang, M. A. Khamehchi, M. J. Davis, and P. Engels, Nature Communications5, 4023 (2014)

work page 2014
[67]

J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev.112, 739 (1958)

work page 1958
[68]

F. T. Vasko and O. E. Raichev,Quantum Kinetic Theory and Applications: Electrons, Photons, Phonons, 1st ed. (Springer-Verlag New York, 2005)

work page 2005
[69]

N. A. Sinitsyn, J. E. Hill, H. Min, J. Sinova, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 106804 (2006)

work page 2006
[70]

Tworzydlo, B

J. Tworzydlo, B. Trauzettel, M. Titov, A. Rycerz, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 246802 (2006)

work page 2006
[71]

Replacing that with a finite initial time t0 simply changesttot−t 0 in the oscillatory factors, for examplesinω(t−t 0), without changing the physical conclusions

The choice of initial time is arbitrary and I have taken it to be zero. Replacing that with a finite initial time t0 simply changesttot−t 0 in the oscillatory factors, for examplesinω(t−t 0), without changing the physical conclusions

work page
[72]

J. P. Provost and G. Vallée, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics76, 289 (1980)

work page 1980
[73]

Resta, Reviews of modern physics66, 899 (1994)

R. Resta, Reviews of modern physics66, 899 (1994)

work page 1994
[74]

Culcer, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures44, 860 (2012), sI:Topological Insulators

D. Culcer, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures44, 860 (2012), sI:Topological Insulators

work page 2012
[75]

A. W. W. Ludwig, M. P. A. Fisher, R. Shankar, and G. Grinstein, Phys. Rev. B50, 7526 (1994)

work page 1994
[76]

Culcer, Y

D. Culcer, Y. Yao, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B72, 085110 (2005)

work page 2005

[1] [1]

R. G. Chambers, Proceedings of the Physical Society89, 695 (1966)

work page 1966

[2] [2]

N. W. Ashcroft and N. D. Mermin,Solid State Physics (Holt-Saunders, 1976)

work page 1976

[3] [3]

Sundaram and Q

G. Sundaram and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B59, 14915 (1999)

work page 1999

[4] [4]

Jungwirth, Q

T. Jungwirth, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett.88, 207208 (2002)

work page 2002

[5] [5]

N. A. Sinitsyn, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 20, 023201 (2007)

work page 2007

[6] [6]

Nagaosa, J

N. Nagaosa, J. Sinova, S. Onoda, A. H. MacDonald, and N. P. Ong, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1539 (2010)

work page 2010

[7] [7]

Matsumoto and S

R. Matsumoto and S. Murakami, Phys. Rev. Lett.106, 197202 (2011)

work page 2011

[8] [8]

Cheng, S

R. Cheng, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 217202 (2016)

work page 2016

[9] [9]

Y.GaoandD.Xiao,Phys.Rev.Lett.122,227402(2019)

work page 2019

[10] [10]

Zhang, Y

X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, S. Okamoto, and D. Xiao, Phys. Rev. Lett.123, 167202 (2019)

work page 2019

[11] [11]

Culcer, inEncyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics, Vol

D. Culcer, inEncyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics, Vol. 1 (Elsevier, 2024) p. 587

work page 2024

[12] [12]

Shindou and K.-I

R. Shindou and K.-I. Imura, Nuclear Physics B720, 399 (2005)

work page 2005

[13] [13]

Dumitrescu, C

E. Dumitrescu, C. Zhang, D. C. Marinescu, and S. Tewari, Phys. Rev. B85, 245301 (2012)

work page 2012

[14] [14]

D. T. Son and B. Z. Spivak, Phys. Rev. B88, 104412 (2013)

work page 2013

[15] [15]

J. C. W. Song, G. Refael, and P. A. Lee, Phys. Rev. B 92, 180204 (2015)

work page 2015

[16] [16]

S. A. Yang, H. Pan, and F. Zhang, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 156603 (2015)

work page 2015

[17] [17]

Y. D. Lensky, J. C. W. Song, P. Samutpraphoot, and L. S. Levitov, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 256601 (2015)

work page 2015

[18] [18]

Chang and M.-F

M.-C. Chang and M.-F. Yang, Phys. Rev. B91, 115203 (2015)

work page 2015

[19] [19]

E. V. Gorbar, V. A. Miransky, I. A. Shovkovy, and P. O. Sukhachov, Phys. Rev. B98, 045203 (2018)

work page 2018

[20] [20]

Misaki, S

K. Misaki, S. Miyashita, and N. Nagaosa, Phys. Rev. B 97, 075122 (2018)

work page 2018

[21] [21]

Araki, Scientific Reports8, 15236 (2018)

Y. Araki, Scientific Reports8, 15236 (2018)

work page 2018

[22] [22]

Alexandradinata and L

A. Alexandradinata and L. Glazman, Phys. Rev. B97, 144422 (2018)

work page 2018

[23] [23]

Das and A

K. Das and A. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. B99, 085405 (2019)

work page 2019

[24] [24]

Nandy, A

S. Nandy, A. Taraphder, and S. Tewari, Phys. Rev. B 100, 115139 (2019)

work page 2019

[25] [25]

Hou, Y.-F

Z. Hou, Y.-F. Zhou, N.-X. Yang, and Q.-F. Sun, Com- munications Physics2, 86 (2019)

work page 2019

[26] [26]

P. Zhu, T. L. Hughes, and A. Alexandradinata, Phys. Rev. B103, 014417 (2021)

work page 2021

[27] [27]

Yokoyama, Sci Rep11, 12065 (2021)

T. Yokoyama, Sci Rep11, 12065 (2021)

work page 2021

[28] [28]

Z. Wang, L. Dong, C. Xiao, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 187001 (2021)

work page 2021

[29] [29]

Das and A

K. Das and A. Agarwal, Phys. Rev. B103, 125432 (2021)

work page 2021

[30] [30]

Chaudhary, C

S. Chaudhary, C. Knapp, and G. Refael, Phys. Rev. B 103, 165119 (2021)

work page 2021

[31] [31]

Bhowal and G

S. Bhowal and G. Vignale, Phys. Rev. B103, 195309 (2021)

work page 2021

[32] [32]

Battiato, European Journal of Physics42, 035403 (2021)

M. Battiato, European Journal of Physics42, 035403 (2021)

work page 2021

[33] [33]

Valet and R

T. Valet and R. Raimondi, Europhysics Letters (EPL) 143, 26004 (2023)

work page 2023

[34] [34]

J. E. Moore and J. Orenstein, Phys. Rev. Lett.105, 026805 (2010)

work page 2010

[35] [35]

Sodemann and L

I. Sodemann and L. Fu, Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 216806 (2015)

work page 2015

[36] [36]

Morimoto, S

T. Morimoto, S. Zhong, J. Orenstein, and J. E. Moore, Phys. Rev. B94, 245121 (2016)

work page 2016

[37] [37]

C. Zeng, S. Nandy, A. Taraphder, and S. Tewari, Phys. Rev. B100, 245102 (2019)

work page 2019

[38] [38]

L. E. Golub, E. L. Ivchenko, and B. Spivak, Phys. Rev. B102, 085202 (2020)

work page 2020

[39] [39]

X. Wang, J. R. Yates, I. Souza, and D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B74, 195118 (2006)

work page 2006

[40] [40]

X. Wang, D. Vanderbilt, J. R. Yates, and I. Souza, Phys. Rev. B76, 195109 (2007)

work page 2007

[41] [41]

M.Gradhand, D.V.Fedorov, F.Pientka, P.Zahn, I.Mer- tig, and B. L. Györffy, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter24, 213202 (2012)

work page 2012

[42] [42]

Y. He, J. Moore, and C. M. Varma, Phys. Rev. B85, 155106 (2012)

work page 2012

[43] [43]

H. Chen, Q. Niu, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 017205 (2014)

work page 2014

[44] [44]

Olsen and I

T. Olsen and I. Souza, Phys. Rev. B92, 125146 (2015)

work page 2015

[45] [45]

Feng, C.-C

W. Feng, C.-C. Liu, G.-B. Liu, J.-J. Zhou, and Y. Yao, Computational Materials Science112, 428 (2016), com- putational Materials Science in China

work page 2016

[46] [46]

X. Dai, Z. Z. Du, and H.-Z. Lu, Phys. Rev. Lett.119, 166601 (2017)

work page 2017

[47] [47]

J. H. J. Martiny, K. Kaasbjerg, and A.-P. Jauho, Phys. Rev. B100, 155414 (2019)

work page 2019

[48] [48]

Wuttke, F

C. Wuttke, F. Caglieris, S. Sykora, F. Scaravaggi, A. U. B. Wolter, K. Manna, V. Süss, C. Shekhar, C. Felser, B. Büchner, and C. Hess, Phys. Rev. B100, 085111 (2019)

work page 2019

[49] [49]

S. Du, P. Tang, J. Li, Z. Lin, Y. Xu, W. Duan, and A. Rubio, Phys. Rev. Research2, 022025 (2020)

work page 2020

[50] [50]

W.-Y.He, D.Goldhaber-Gordon, andK.T.Law,Nature Communications11, 1650 (2020)

work page 2020

[51] [51]

W.-Y.HeandK.T.Law,Phys.Rev.Research3,L032012 (2021)

work page 2021

[52] [52]

Chang and Q

M.-C. Chang and Q. Niu, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter20, 193202 (2008)

work page 2008

[53] [53]

Culcer, A

D. Culcer, A. Sekine, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. B96, 035106 (2017)

work page 2017

[54] [54]

Stedman, C

T. Stedman, C. Timm, and L. M. Woods, New Journal of Physics21, 103007 (2019)

work page 2019

[55] [55]

Stedman and L

T. Stedman and L. M. Woods, Phys. Rev. Research2, 033086 (2020)

work page 2020

[56] [56]

R. B. Atencia, Q. Niu, and D. Culcer, Phys. Rev. Res. 4, 013001 (2022)

work page 2022

[57] [57]

Y. Gao, S. A. Yang, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 6 166601 (2014)

work page 2014

[58] [58]

Xiao, M.-C

D. Xiao, M.-C. Chang, and Q. Niu, Rev. Mod. Phys.82, 1959 (2010)

work page 1959

[59] [59]

Zawadzki, Phys

W. Zawadzki, Phys. Rev. B72, 085217 (2005)

work page 2005

[60] [60]

Schliemann, D

J. Schliemann, D. Loss, and R. M. Westervelt, Phys. Rev. B73, 085323 (2006)

work page 2006

[61] [61]

Culcer, C

D. Culcer, C. Lechner, and R. Winkler, Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 106601 (2006)

work page 2006

[62] [62]

M. I. Katsnelson, Eur. Phys. J. B51, 157 (2006)

work page 2006

[63] [63]

Winkler, U

R. Winkler, U. Zulicke, and J. Bolte, Phys. Rev. B75, 205314 (2006)

work page 2006

[64] [64]

T. M. Rusin and W. Zawadzki, Journal of Physics: Con- densed Matter21, 136219 (2009)

work page 2009

[65] [65]

Zawadzki, Physics Letters A374, 3177 (2010)

W. Zawadzki, Physics Letters A374, 3177 (2010)

work page 2010

[66] [66]

Hamner, Y

C. Hamner, Y. Zhang, M. A. Khamehchi, M. J. Davis, and P. Engels, Nature Communications5, 4023 (2014)

work page 2014

[67] [67]

J. M. Luttinger, Phys. Rev.112, 739 (1958)

work page 1958

[68] [68]

F. T. Vasko and O. E. Raichev,Quantum Kinetic Theory and Applications: Electrons, Photons, Phonons, 1st ed. (Springer-Verlag New York, 2005)

work page 2005

[69] [69]

N. A. Sinitsyn, J. E. Hill, H. Min, J. Sinova, and A. H. MacDonald, Phys. Rev. Lett.97, 106804 (2006)

work page 2006

[70] [70]

Tworzydlo, B

J. Tworzydlo, B. Trauzettel, M. Titov, A. Rycerz, and C. W. J. Beenakker, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 246802 (2006)

work page 2006

[71] [71]

Replacing that with a finite initial time t0 simply changesttot−t 0 in the oscillatory factors, for examplesinω(t−t 0), without changing the physical conclusions

The choice of initial time is arbitrary and I have taken it to be zero. Replacing that with a finite initial time t0 simply changesttot−t 0 in the oscillatory factors, for examplesinω(t−t 0), without changing the physical conclusions

work page

[72] [72]

J. P. Provost and G. Vallée, Communications in Mathe- matical Physics76, 289 (1980)

work page 1980

[73] [73]

Resta, Reviews of modern physics66, 899 (1994)

R. Resta, Reviews of modern physics66, 899 (1994)

work page 1994

[74] [74]

Culcer, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures44, 860 (2012), sI:Topological Insulators

D. Culcer, Physica E: Low-dimensional Systems and Nanostructures44, 860 (2012), sI:Topological Insulators

work page 2012

[75] [75]

A. W. W. Ludwig, M. P. A. Fisher, R. Shankar, and G. Grinstein, Phys. Rev. B50, 7526 (1994)

work page 1994

[76] [76]

Culcer, Y

D. Culcer, Y. Yao, and Q. Niu, Phys. Rev. B72, 085110 (2005)

work page 2005