pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.15434 · v1 · pith:2AAHHZ2Enew · submitted 2026-05-14 · 🧮 math.NT

Counting solutions to the quadratic determinant equation

Jonathan Chapman , Akshat Mudgal This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 14:50 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT
keywords determinant equationRamanujan sumsKloosterman sumsasymptotic formulasinteger solutionsquadratic formscounting lattice pointsnumber theory
0
0 comments X

The pith

When h equals N squared plus O(N), the number of solutions to x1 x2 minus x3 x4 equals h inside the box of side 2N admits an asymptotic with square-root cancellation error terms.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper counts the integer solutions to the equation x1 x2 - x3 x4 = h with each variable lying in the interval from negative N to N. A general asymptotic formula is established by combining direct combinatorial arguments in physical space with bounds on Kloosterman sums. In the special range where h is N squared plus at most a constant times N, an extra symmetry of the equation becomes available. This symmetry permits the authors to replace the Kloosterman estimates with Ramanujan sums and thereby reach an error term that exhibits square-root cancellation. The result gives a broad confirmation of an earlier speculation about this particular determinant equation.

Core claim

When h = N^2 + O(N), the number of solutions admits an asymptotic formula with square-root cancellation error terms obtained by exploiting symmetry via Ramanujan sums and bypassing Kloosterman sum bounds.

What carries the argument

The additional symmetry available precisely when h = N^2 + O(N), which permits direct application of Ramanujan sums to the solution count.

If this is right

  • The main term of the count is expressible using standard arithmetic functions such as the divisor function.
  • The error remains of square-root size uniformly over all h in the interval N^2 + O(N).
  • Sharper control is obtained on the distribution of values of the bilinear form near its largest possible magnitude.
  • The method extends previous partial results on this equation to the full range of h up to N squared.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same symmetry argument may apply to other bilinear or quadratic forms that attain a distinguished value inside their range.
  • Numerical verification for large but feasible N could confirm the cancellation rate before analytic proofs are needed.
  • The approach suggests a route to improved error terms in related counting problems where a natural symmetry appears only for special right-hand sides.

Load-bearing premise

The additional symmetry present precisely when h = N^2 + O(N) permits direct use of Ramanujan sums to achieve square-root cancellation without relying on general Kloosterman bounds.

What would settle it

Explicit computation of the exact solution count for a fixed moderate N and an h equal to N squared, followed by checking whether the size of the remainder matches the square-root order rather than the larger size predicted by uniform Kloosterman bounds.

read the original abstract

Given $h, N \in \mathbb{N}$ satisfying $1 \leqslant h \leqslant N^2$, we prove an asymptotic formula for the number of solutions to the equation $x_1 x_2 - x_3 x_4 = h$ with $x_1, \ldots, x_4 \in [-N,N] \cap \mathbb{Z}$. We use a combination of combinatorial and analytic arguments in physical space along with bounds for Kloosterman sums. Our main result concerns the case when $h = N^2 + O(N)$, wherein we obtain square-root cancellation error terms by bypassing Kloosterman sum bounds and exploiting an additional symmetry available in this setting via Ramanujan sums. This confirms a speculation of Dhanda-Haynes-Prasala in a very general form.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript proves an asymptotic formula for the number of integer solutions (x1,x2,x3,x4) in [-N,N]^4 to the equation x1 x2 - x3 x4 = h, where 1 ≤ h ≤ N². The central result addresses the regime h = N² + O(N), deriving an asymptotic with square-root cancellation error terms by reducing the count to a Ramanujan-sum expression that exploits an additional symmetry in this range, thereby avoiding general Kloosterman sum bounds. The argument combines a combinatorial decomposition in physical space with analytic estimates and confirms a speculation of Dhanda-Haynes-Prasala.

Significance. If the main result holds, the paper contributes a sharp asymptotic in a narrow range around the maximum value of the determinant form, where standard methods produce weaker error terms. The explicit reduction to Ramanujan sums demonstrates how symmetry can be leveraged for square-root cancellation without heavier analytic machinery, offering a template for related counting problems on quadratic hypersurfaces or lattice-point problems with special arithmetic structure.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract would be strengthened by explicitly naming the main theorem (e.g., Theorem 1.2) that encodes the special-case asymptotic.
  2. [§1] In the introduction, a short paragraph outlining the separation between the general combinatorial-analytic argument and the special-case Ramanujan-sum reduction would improve readability.
  3. [References] Ensure the citation for Dhanda-Haynes-Prasala includes the full title, journal or arXiv identifier, and year.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive report, accurate summary of the main result, and recommendation of minor revision. The referee correctly identifies the key innovation: obtaining square-root cancellation for h = N² + O(N) by reducing to Ramanujan sums and exploiting the additional symmetry in this narrow range, thereby confirming the speculation of Dhanda-Haynes-Prasala without relying on general Kloosterman bounds.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation relies on standard analytic tools

full rationale

The paper derives an asymptotic formula for the number of solutions to x1 x2 - x3 x4 = h using combinatorial decompositions in physical space combined with standard bounds on Kloosterman sums for the general case. In the special regime h = N^2 + O(N), it exploits an additional symmetry to reduce directly to an expression involving Ramanujan sums, whose square-root cancellation follows from their established orthogonality and summation properties rather than any fitted parameter or self-referential definition. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to the target count or to a self-citation chain; the cited speculation of Dhanda-Haynes-Prasala is external and the argument remains self-contained against external benchmarks such as known sum estimates.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard analytic number theory machinery without introducing new free parameters or postulated entities.

axioms (2)
  • standard math Known bounds for Kloosterman sums
    Invoked for the general h case as stated in the abstract.
  • standard math Properties of Ramanujan sums
    Used to obtain the improved error term in the special case.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5659 in / 1188 out tokens · 67645 ms · 2026-05-19T14:50:10.215864+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

18 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · 2 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Afifurrahman,A uniform formula on the number of integer matrices with given determinant and height, J

    M. Afifurrahman,A uniform formula on the number of integer matrices with given determinant and height, J. Number Theory281(2026), 741–770

    work page 2026

  2. [2]

    Apostol,Introduction to analytic number theory, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer- Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1976

    T. Apostol,Introduction to analytic number theory, Undergraduate Texts in Mathematics, Springer- Verlag, New York-Heidelberg, 1976

    work page 1976

  3. [3]

    Chapman, A

    J. Chapman, A. Mudgal,On commuting integer matrices, arXiv:2504.15839, to appear in Trans. Amer. Math. Soc

    work page arXiv

  4. [4]

    Chapman, A

    J. Chapman, A. Mudgal,Counting2×2integer matrices with a given determinant, arXiv:2509.20259

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  5. [5]

    Deshouillers, H

    J.-M. Deshouillers, H. Iwaniec,An additive divisor problem, J. London Math. Soc. (2)26(1982), no. 1, 1–14

    work page 1982

  6. [6]

    Dhanda, A

    K. Dhanda, A. Haynes, S. Prasala,Counting2×2matrices with fixed determinant and bounded coef- ficients, arXiv:2509.16890

    work page arXiv

  7. [7]

    Ganguly, R

    S. Ganguly, R. Guria,Lattice points on determinant surfaces and the spectrum of the automorphic Laplacian, arXiv:2410.04637

    work page internal anchor Pith review arXiv

  8. [8]

    D. R. Heath-Brown,The fourth power moment of the Riemann zeta function, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3)38(1979), no. 3, 385–422

    work page 1979

  9. [9]

    D. R. Heath-Brown,A new form of the circle method, and its application to quadratic forms, J. Reine Angew. Math.481(1996), 149–206. 28 JONATHAN CHAPMAN AND AKSHAT MUDGAL

    work page 1996

  10. [10]

    Hooley,An asymptotic formula in the theory of numbers, Proc

    C. Hooley,An asymptotic formula in the theory of numbers, Proc. London Math. Soc. (3)7(1957), 396–413

    work page 1957

  11. [11]

    Hooley,On the number of divisors of a quadratic polynomial, Acta Math.110(1963), 97–114

    C. Hooley,On the number of divisors of a quadratic polynomial, Acta Math.110(1963), 97–114

    work page 1963

  12. [12]

    Iwaniec,Spectral methods of automorphic forms, Second edition Grad

    H. Iwaniec,Spectral methods of automorphic forms, Second edition Grad. Stud. Math., 53 American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI; Revista Matem´ atica Iberoamericana, Madrid, 2002

    work page 2002

  13. [13]

    Lewin,Dilogarithms and associated functions, Macdonald, London, 1958

    L. Lewin,Dilogarithms and associated functions, Macdonald, London, 1958

    work page 1958

  14. [14]

    Martin, E

    G. Martin, E. P. White, C. H. Yip,Asymptotics for the number of directions determined by[n]×[n] inF 2 p, Mathematika68(2022), no. 2, 511–534

    work page 2022

  15. [15]

    Meurman,On the binary additive divisor problem, Number theory (Turku, 1999), 223—246, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 2001

    T. Meurman,On the binary additive divisor problem, Number theory (Turku, 1999), 223—246, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 2001

    work page 1999

  16. [16]

    Motohashi,The binary additive divisor problem, Ann

    Y. Motohashi,The binary additive divisor problem, Ann. Sci. ´Ecole Norm. Sup. (4)27(1994), no. 5, 529–572

    work page 1994

  17. [17]

    Niedermowwe,The circle method with weights for the representation of integers by quadratic forms, J

    N. Niedermowwe,The circle method with weights for the representation of integers by quadratic forms, J. Math. Sci. (N.Y.)171(2010), no. 6, 753–764

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    Oh,Hardy-Littlewood system and representations of integers by an invariant polynomial, Geom

    H. Oh,Hardy-Littlewood system and representations of integers by an invariant polynomial, Geom. Funct. Anal.14(2004), no. 4, 791–809. Mathematics Institute, Zeeman Building, University of W arwick, Coventry CV4 7AL, United Kingdom Email address:Jonathan.Chapman@warwick.ac.uk Mathematics Institute, Zeeman Building, University of W arwick, Coventry CV4 7AL,...

    work page 2004