pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16256 · v1 · pith:HE4UQ5BKnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas · cond-mat.other

Polariton BECs: Theory and Concepts

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 18:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.quant-gas cond-mat.other
keywords polaritonsBose-Einstein condensationcoherencelinear effectsnon-interacting modelslight-matter couplingdriven dissipative systemsbosonic correlations
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:HE4UQ5BK Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number?
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{HE4UQ5BK}

Prints a linked pith:HE4UQ5BK badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

Much of polariton condensate coherence and correlations arise from linear interference rather than strong interactions.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Polaritons combine light's strong interference with excitons' weak interactions, creating particles whose condensation and coherence the paper examines through selected theoretical concepts. It distinguishes these hybrid systems from atomic Bose-Einstein condensates and highlights points of ongoing debate. The central argument is that linear, non-interacting models often suffice to explain bosonic correlations and coherence buildup, suggesting that strong interactions or deep quantum effects are not always required. A sympathetic reader would care because this reframes a large share of observed phenomenology as simpler and more accessible than interaction-dominated pictures imply.

Core claim

Polaritons are WISI particles whose unique light-matter superposition permits linear and non-interacting effects to account for much of the observed coherence and bosonic correlations, so that a significant part of the phenomenology can be understood without invoking strong interactions or genuine quantum effects.

What carries the argument

The WISI (Weakly-Interacting, Strongly-Interfering) character arising from the light-matter superposition of polaritons, which enables linear non-interacting models to capture coherence and correlations.

If this is right

  • Many features previously attributed to polariton-polariton interactions could be reinterpreted as linear interference effects.
  • Theoretical descriptions of polariton dynamics can often be simplified by dropping nonlinear terms without losing essential physics.
  • Distinctions between polariton condensates and atomic BECs become sharper once linear effects are properly weighted.
  • Ongoing controversies about the role of quantum effects in polariton coherence may be resolved by testing linear models first.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If linear models dominate, experiments could be designed to isolate interference signatures and reduce the need for high-density interaction regimes.
  • The same WISI logic might apply to other light-matter hybrids, suggesting a broader class of systems where coherence emerges without strong nonlinearity.
  • Quantitative comparisons between linear predictions and data in existing samples could quickly test how far the non-interacting picture reaches.

Load-bearing premise

The light-matter superposition in polaritons really does let linear non-interacting models explain observed coherence and correlations instead of interaction-based mechanisms.

What would settle it

An experiment that measures coherence buildup or correlation functions in a polariton system under conditions where linear models make a clear prediction but interacting models predict a qualitatively different outcome, such as a threshold behavior absent in the linear case.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16256 by Fabrice Laussy.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Polaritons are a superposition of light and matter, that combine Strong Interferences (of light) with Weak Interactions (of excitons), making them WISI (Weakly-Interacting, Strongly-Interfering) particles. Their condensation is the main highlight of a field which occupies a unique position at the intersection of quantum optics, condensed matter physics and nonlinear dynamics of driven, dissipative systems. This chapter surveys selected theoretical concepts of polariton condensates' formation, coherence and dynamics, with an emphasis on their distinctions from their atomic counterparts and on points of ongoing controversy. We argue that linear and non-interacting effects are undervalued in polariton physics, and that a significant part of the phenomenology -- including bosonic correlations and coherence buildup -- can often be understood without invoking strong interactions or genuine quantum effects.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a conceptual survey chapter on polariton Bose-Einstein condensates, introducing their WISI (Weakly-Interacting, Strongly-Interfering) character arising from light-matter superposition. It surveys selected theoretical concepts of condensate formation, coherence buildup, and dynamics, with emphasis on distinctions from atomic BECs and ongoing controversies. The central argument is that linear and non-interacting effects are often sufficient to account for bosonic correlations and coherence, without requiring strong interactions or genuine quantum effects.

Significance. If the interpretive claims hold, the survey could usefully reorient parts of the polariton literature toward simpler linear models in driven-dissipative systems. It provides a perspective that bridges quantum optics and condensed-matter approaches and may help clarify when interaction-based explanations are necessary versus when interference suffices. The absence of new derivations or data is consistent with its survey character.

minor comments (2)
  1. The definition and implications of the WISI acronym are introduced in the abstract but would benefit from a dedicated early section or figure illustrating how the light-matter superposition quantitatively separates interference from interaction scales.
  2. When discussing points of ongoing controversy, the text references prior literature but could add one or two explicit citations per controversy to allow readers to trace the re-evaluation argument more directly.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and positive assessment of our manuscript as a conceptual survey. We appreciate the recognition that our emphasis on the WISI character of polaritons and the sufficiency of linear effects may help reorient parts of the literature. We agree with the recommendation for minor revision and will incorporate clarifications where appropriate.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: The central argument is that linear and non-interacting effects are often sufficient to account for bosonic correlations and coherence, without requiring strong interactions or genuine quantum effects.

    Authors: This accurately reflects our position. The manuscript surveys how interference and linear driven-dissipative dynamics can produce many observed features, and we have highlighted this as an undervalued perspective without claiming it explains every regime. revision: no

  2. Referee: The absence of new derivations or data is consistent with its survey character.

    Authors: We agree. As a review chapter, the work focuses on conceptual synthesis and distinctions from atomic BECs rather than presenting original calculations. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in conceptual survey

full rationale

The paper is a conceptual survey of polariton BEC theory that emphasizes the WISI character and argues linear non-interacting effects often suffice for coherence and bosonic correlations. It presents no derivation chain, quantitative predictions, or first-principles results that reduce by the paper's own equations or self-citations to its inputs. The central claims are interpretive re-evaluations acknowledging ongoing controversies, with content independent of any fitted parameters or load-bearing self-citations. This is self-contained against external benchmarks as expected for a survey paper.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central interpretive claim rests on standard domain assumptions from quantum optics and condensed-matter physics regarding the light-matter superposition and driven-dissipative nature of polaritons; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Polaritons are a superposition of light and matter (excitons) that combine strong interference with weak interactions.
    Stated directly in the opening sentence of the abstract as the defining property.
  • domain assumption Polariton condensation occurs in driven, dissipative systems at the intersection of quantum optics, condensed matter, and nonlinear dynamics.
    Invoked to position the field and contrast with atomic BECs.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5655 in / 1281 out tokens · 45939 ms · 2026-05-19T18:13:01.990115+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

259 extracted references · 259 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Hopfield, J. J. Theory of the contribution of excitons to the complex dielectric constant of crystals.Phys. Rev.112, 1555 (1958). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRev. 112.1555

  2. [2]

    Pekar, S. I. Theory of electromagnetic waves in a crystal in which excitons arise.J. Exp. Th. Phys.33, 1022 (1957)

  3. [3]

    Agranovich, V. M. Dispersion of electromagnetic waves in crystals.J. Exp. Th. Phys.37, 430 (1959)

  4. [4]

    Hopfield, J. J. Whatever happened to solid state physics?Annu. Rev. Condens. Mat- ter Phys.5, 1 (2014). URLdoi:10.1146/ annurev-conmatphys-031113-133924. 27

  5. [5]

    URLdoi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00435

    Ballarini, D.et al.Polaritonic neuromorphic comput- ing outperforms linear classifiers.Nano Lett.20, 3506 (2020). URLdoi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c00435

  6. [6]

    & Kavokin, A

    Sedov, E. & Kavokin, A. Polariton lattices as bina- rized neuromorphic networks.Light: Sci. & App.14, 52 (2025). URLdoi:10.1038/s41377-024-01719-4

  7. [7]

    Mat.37, e07612 (2025)

    Opala, A.et al.Perovskite microwires for room temper- ature exciton-polariton neural network.Adv. Mat.37, e07612 (2025). URLdoi:10.1002/adma.202507612

  8. [8]

    URL doi:10.1186/s43593-025-00087-9

    Gan, Y.et al.Ultrafast neuromorphic computing driven by polariton nonlinearities.eLight5, 9 (2025). URL doi:10.1186/s43593-025-00087-9

  9. [9]

    Kittel, C.Introduction to Solid State Physics(Wiley, 2004), 8th edn

  10. [10]

    R.Theory of Excitons(Academic Press, New York, 1963)

    Knox, S. R.Theory of Excitons(Academic Press, New York, 1963)

  11. [11]

    On the interaction between the radiation field and ionic crystals.Proc

    Huang, K. On the interaction between the radiation field and ionic crystals.Proc. R. Soc. Lond. A208, 352 (1951). URLdoi:10.1098/rspa.1951.0166

  12. [12]

    Laussy, F. P. & Kavokin, A. Excitons in crystals. Encycl. Cond. Mat. Phys.3, 706 (2024). URLdoi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-90800-9.00163-3

  13. [13]

    On the dynamical behavior of an exciton

    Toyozawa, Y. On the dynamical behavior of an exciton. Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl.12, 111 (1959). URLdoi: 10.1143/ptps.12.111

  14. [14]

    & Arakawa, Y

    Weisbuch, C., Nishioka, M., Ishikawa, A. & Arakawa, Y. Observation of the coupled exciton-photon mode splitting in a semiconductor quantum microcavity. Phys. Rev. Lett.69, 3314 (1992). URLdoi:10.1103/ PhysRevLett.69.3314

  15. [15]

    & Benisty, H

    Weisbuch, C. & Benisty, H. Microcavities in Ecole Polytechnique F´ ed´ erale de Lausanne, Ecole Polytech- nique (France) and elsewhere: past, present and fu- ture.Phys. Stat. Sol. B242, 2345 (2005). URL doi:10.1002/pssb.200560972

  16. [16]

    & Ulbrich, R

    Weisbuch, C. & Ulbrich, R. G. Resonant polariton flu- orescence in gallium arsenide.Phys. Rev. Lett.39, 654 (1977). URLdoi:10.1103/physrevlett.39.654

  17. [17]

    G., Thompson, R

    Raizen, M. G., Thompson, R. J., Brecha, R. J., Kimble, H. J. & Carmichael, H. J. Normal-mode splitting and linewidth averaging for two-state atoms in an optical cavity.Phys. Rev. Lett.63, 240 (1989). URLdoi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.63.240

  18. [18]

    & Burstein, E

    Weisbuch, C. & Burstein, E. (eds.)Confined Electrons and Photons: New Physics and Applications(Springer, 1995)

  19. [19]

    Yamamoto, Y.et al.Quantum electrodynamic effects in semiconductor microcavities - microlasers and coher- ent exciton-polariton emission.J. Phys. IV (Fr.)3, 39 (1993). URLdoi:10.1051/jp4:1993507

  20. [20]

    P., Oesterle, U., Ilegems, M

    Houdr´ e, R., Stanley, R. P., Oesterle, U., Ilegems, M. & Weisbuch, C. Room-temperature cavity polaritons in a semiconductor microcavity.Phys. Rev. B49, 16761 (1994). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevB.49.16761

  21. [21]

    & Tassone, F

    Savona, V. & Tassone, F. Exact quantum calculation of polariton dispersion in semiconductor microcavities. Solid State Commun.95, 673 (1995). URLdoi:10. 1016/0038-1098(95)00355-X

  22. [22]

    C., Schwendimann, P

    Savona, V., Andreani, L. C., Schwendimann, P. & Quat- tropani, A. Quantum well excitons in semiconductor mi- crocavities: Unified treatment of weak and strong cou- pling regimes.Solid State Commun.93, 733 (1995). URLdoi:10.1016/0038-1098(94)00865-5

  23. [23]

    & Yamamoto, Y

    Pau, S., Bj¨ ork, G., Jacobson, J., Cao, H. & Yamamoto, Y. Microcavity exciton-polariton splitting in the linear regime.Phys. Rev. B51, 14437 (1995). URLdoi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.14437

  24. [24]

    C., Laussy, F

    Zubizarreta Casalengua, E., L´ opez Carre˜ no, J. C., Laussy, F. P. & del Valle, E. Conventional and un- conventional photon statistics.Laser Photon. Rev.14, 1900279 (2020). URLdoi:10.1002/lpor.201900279

  25. [25]

    & Carusotto, I

    Verger, A., Ciuti, C. & Carusotto, I. Polariton quantum blockade in a photonic dot.Phys. Rev. B73, 193306 (2006). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevB.73.193306

  26. [26]

    Structure of a quantized vortex in boson systems.Il Nuovo Cimento20, 454 (1961)

    Gross, E. Structure of a quantized vortex in boson systems.Il Nuovo Cimento20, 454 (1961). URL doi:10.1007/bf02731494

  27. [27]

    Pitaevskii, L. P. Vortex lines in an imperfect bose gas. Sov. Phys. JETP13, 451 (1961). URLhttp://jetp. ras.ru/cgi-bin/dn/e_013_02_0451.pdf. Translation of Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 40, 646 (1961)

  28. [28]

    & Laussy, F

    Zubizarreta Casalengua, E. & Laussy, F. P. Spatial cor- relations of vortex quantum states.arXiv:2402.01627 (2024). URLdoi:10.48550/arXiv.2402.01627

  29. [29]

    Early stages of continuous wave experi- ments on cavity-polaritons.Phys

    Houdr´ e, R. Early stages of continuous wave experi- ments on cavity-polaritons.Phys. Stat. Sol. B242, 2167 (2005). URLdoi:10.1002/pssb.200560966

  30. [30]

    Zhu, Y.et al.Vacuum Rabi splitting as a feature of linear-dispersion theory: Analysis and experimental ob- servations.Phys. Rev. Lett.64, 2499 (1990). URL doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.2499

  31. [31]

    & Ciuti, C

    Carusotto, I. & Ciuti, C. Quantum fluids of light. Rev. Mod. Phys.85, 299 (2013). URLdoi:10.1103/ RevModPhys.85.299

  32. [32]

    G.et al.Quantum hydrodynamics of a single particle.Light: Sci

    Su´ arez-Forero, D. G.et al.Quantum hydrodynamics of a single particle.Light: Sci. & App.9, 85 (2020). URL doi:10.1038/s41377-020-0324-x

  33. [33]

    C., S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, C., Sanvitto, D., del Valle, E

    L´ opez Carre˜ no, J. C., S´ anchez Mu˜ noz, C., Sanvitto, D., del Valle, E. & Laussy, F. P. Exciting polaritons with quantum light.Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 196402 (2015). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.196402

  34. [34]

    S., Chestnov, I

    Demirchyan, S. S., Chestnov, I. Y., Alodjants, A. P., Glazov, M. M. & Kavokin, A. V. Qubits based on po- lariton rabi oscillators.Phys. Rev. Lett.112, 196403 (2014). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.196403

  35. [35]

    Spreeuw, R. J. C. Classical wave-optics analogy of quantum-information processing.Phys. Rev. A 63, 062302 (2001). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevA.63. 062302

  36. [36]

    Dominici, L.et al.Ultrafast control and Rabi oscilla- tions of polaritons.Phys. Rev. Lett.113, 226401 (2014). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.113.226401

  37. [37]

    Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases.Sitzungsberichte der PreuSSischen Akademie der Wissenschaften1, 3 (1925)

    Einstein, A. Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases.Sitzungsberichte der PreuSSischen Akademie der Wissenschaften1, 3 (1925). URLdoi:10.1002/ 3527608958.ch28

  38. [38]

    Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases.K¨ onigliche PreuSSische Akademie der Wis- senschaften

    Einstein, A. Quantentheorie des einatomigen idealen Gases.K¨ onigliche PreuSSische Akademie der Wis- senschaften. Sitzungsberichte: 261-267(1924). URL doi:10.1002/3527608958.ch27

  39. [39]

    Zur quantentheorie der strahlung.Phys

    Einstein, A. Zur quantentheorie der strahlung.Phys. Z.18, 121 (1917)

  40. [40]

    P., Zeiger, H

    Gordon, J. P., Zeiger, H. J. & Townes, C. H. The maser—new type of microwave amplifier, frequency standard, and spectrometer.Phys. Rev.99, 1264 (1955). URLdoi:10.1103/physrev.99.1264. 28

  41. [41]

    Bose condensation of strongly excited lon- gitudinal electric modes.Phys

    Fr¨ ohlich, H. Bose condensation of strongly excited lon- gitudinal electric modes.Phys. Lett. A26, 402 (1968). URLdoi:10.1016/0375-9601(68)90242-9

  42. [42]

    Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems.Int

    Fr¨ ohlich, H. Long-range coherence and energy storage in biological systems.Int. J. of Quant. Chem.2, 641 (1968). URLdoi:10.1002/qua.560020505

  43. [45]

    Maiman, T. H. Stimulated optical radiation in ruby. Nature187, 493 (1960). URLdoi:10.1038/187493a0

  44. [46]

    H., Ensher, J

    Anderson, M. H., Ensher, J. R., Matthews, M. R., Wie- man, C. E. & Cornell, E. A. Observation of Bose- Einstein condensation in a dilute atomic vapor.Sci- ence269, 198 (1995). URLdoi:10.1126/science.269. 5221.198

  45. [47]

    B.et al.Bose–Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms.Phys

    Davis, K. B.et al.Bose–Einstein condensation in a gas of sodium atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett.75, 3969 (1995). URL doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.75.3969

  46. [48]

    M., B¨ oer, K

    Blatt, J. M., B¨ oer, K. W. & Brandt, W. Bose–Einstein condensation of excitons.Phys. Rev.126, 1691 (1962). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRev.126.1691

  47. [49]

    Keldysh, L. V. & Kozlov, A. N. Collective properties of excitons in semiconductors.J. Exp. Th. Phys.27, 521 (1968)

  48. [50]

    & Haug, H

    Hanamura, E. & Haug, H. Condensation effects of ex- citons.Phys. Rep.33, 209 (1977). URLdoi:10.1016/ 0370-1573(77)90012-6

  49. [51]

    Peyghambarian, N., Chase, L. L. & Mysyrowicz, A. Bose–Einstein statistical properties and condensation of excitonic molecules in CuCl.Phys. Rev. B27, 2325 (1983). URLdoi:10.1103/physrevb.27.2325

  50. [52]

    Lin, J. L. & Wolfe, J. P. Bose–Einstein condensation of paraexcitons in stressed cu2o.Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1222 (1993). URLdoi:10.1103/physrevlett.71.1222

  51. [53]

    V., Zrenner, A., Abstreiter, G., B¨ ohm, G

    Butov, L. V., Zrenner, A., Abstreiter, G., B¨ ohm, G. & Weimann, G. Condensation of indirect excitons in coupled alas/gaas quantum wells.Phys. Rev. Lett.73, 304 (1994). URLdoi:10.1103/physrevlett.73.304

  52. [54]

    V., Lai, C

    Butov, L. V., Lai, C. W., Ivanov, A. L., Gossard, A. C. & Chemla, D. S. Towards Bose–Einstein condensation of excitons in potential traps.Nature417, 47 (2002). URLdoi:10.1038/417047a

  53. [55]

    Spontaneous Bose coherence of excitons and polaritons.Science298, 5597 (2002)

    Snoke, D. Spontaneous Bose coherence of excitons and polaritons.Science298, 5597 (2002). URLdoi:10. 1126/science.1078082

  54. [56]

    V., Gossard, A

    Butov, L. V., Gossard, A. C. & Chemla, D. S. Macro- scopically ordered state in an exciton system.Nature 418, 751 (2002). URLdoi:10.1038/nature00943

  55. [57]

    & West, K

    Snoke, D., Denev, S., Liu, Y., Pfeiffer, L. & West, K. Long-range transport in excitonic dark states in coupled quantum wells.Nature418, 754 (2002). URLdoi: 10.1038/nature00940

  56. [58]

    Butov, L. V. A polariton laser.Nature447, 540 (2007). URLdoi:10.1038/447540a

  57. [59]

    & Kavokin, A

    Butov, L. & Kavokin, A. The behaviour of exciton- polaritons.Nature Photon.6, 2 (2012). URLdoi:10. 1038/nphoton.2011.325

  58. [60]

    URLdoi: 10.1038/nature05131

    Kasprzak, J.et al.Bose–Einstein condensation of ex- citon polaritons.Nature443, 409 (2006). URLdoi: 10.1038/nature05131

  59. [61]

    & Ya- mamoto, Y

    Deng, H., Weihs, G., Santori, C., Bloch, J. & Ya- mamoto, Y. Condensation of semiconductor microcav- ity exciton polaritons.Science298, 199 (2002). URL doi:10.1126/science.1074464

  60. [62]

    Cao, H.et al.Transition from a microcavity exciton polariton to a photon laser.Phys. Rev. A55, 4632 (1997). URLdoi:10.1103/physreva.55.4632

  61. [63]

    & Hanamura, E

    Yura, F. & Hanamura, E. Coherent light emission from condensing polaritons.Phys. Rev. B50, 15457 (1994). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevB.50.15457

  62. [64]

    J., Pau, S

    ˘Imamo¯ glu, A., Ram, R. J., Pau, S. & Yamamoto, Y. Nonequilibrium condensates and lasers without inver- sion: Exciton-polariton lasers.Phys. Rev. A53, 4250 (1996). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevA.53.4250

  63. [65]

    & Ram, R

    ˘Imamo¯ glu, A. & Ram, R. J. Quantum dynamics of exciton lasers.Physics Letter A214, 193 (1996). URL doi:10.1016/0375-9601(96)00175-2

  64. [66]

    & Igeta, K

    Bj¨ ork, G., Machida, S., Yamamoto, Y. & Igeta, K. Modification of spontaneous emission rate in planar di- electric microcavity structures.Phys. Rev. A44, 669 (1991). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevA.44.669

  65. [67]

    Wiseman, H. M. & Collett, M. J. An atom laser based on dark-state cooling.Phys. Lett. A202, 246 (1995). URLdoi:10.1016/0375-9601(95)00355-7

  66. [68]

    Spreeuw, R. J. C., Pfau, T., Janicke, U. & Wilkens, M. Laser-like scheme for atomic-matter waves.Europhys. Lett.32, 469 (1995). URLdoi:10.1209/0295-5075/ 32/6/002

  67. [69]

    Holland, M., Burnett, K., Gardiner, C., Cirac, J. I. & Zoller, P. Theory of an atom laser.Phys. Rev. A54, R1757 (1996). URLdoi:10.1103/PhysRevA.54.R1757

  68. [70]

    Mewes, M.et al.Output coupler for bose-einstein con- densed atoms.Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 582 (1997). URL doi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.582

  69. [71]

    Meystre, P.Atom Optics(Springer, 2001)

  70. [72]

    & Berloff, N

    Keeling, J. & Berloff, N. G. Exciton-polariton con- densation.Contemp. Phys.52, 131 (2011). URL doi:10.1080/00107514.2010.550120

  71. [73]

    Snoke, D.et al.Reanalysis of experimental determi- nations of polariton-polariton interactions in microcav- ities.Phys. Rev. B107, 165302 (2023). URLdoi: 10.1103/physrevb.107.165302

  72. [74]

    Vishnevsky, D. V. & Laussy, F. Effective attractive polariton-polariton interaction mediated by an exciton reservoir.Phys. Rev. B90, 035413 (2014). URLdoi: 0.1103/PhysRevB.90.035413

  73. [75]

    Reithmaier, J.et al.Size dependence of confined optical modes in photonic quantum dots.Phys. Rev. Lett.78, 378 (1997). URLdoi:10.1103/physrevlett.78.378

  74. [77]

    P., Eleuch, H

    Baas, A., Karr, J. P., Eleuch, H. & Giacobino, E. Optical bistability in semiconductor microcavities. Phys. Rev. A69, 023809 (2004). URLdoi:10.1103/ PhysRevA.69.023809

  75. [78]

    Bajoni, D.et al.Optical bistability in a gaas-based polariton diode.Phys. Rev. Lett.101, 266402 (2008). 29 URLdoi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.266402

  76. [79]

    G.et al.Angle-resonant stimulated polari- ton amplifier.Phys

    Savvidis, P. G.et al.Angle-resonant stimulated polari- ton amplifier.Phys. Rev. Lett.84, 1547 (2000). URL doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1547

  77. [80]

    & K´ ena-Cohen, S

    Sanvitto, D. & K´ ena-Cohen, S. The road towards po- laritonic devices.Nature Mater.15, 1061 (2016). URL doi:10.1038/nmat4668

  78. [81]

    & Quat- tropani, A

    Ciuti, C., Schwendimann, P., Deveaud, B. & Quat- tropani, A. Theory of the angle-resonant polariton amplifier.Phys. Rev. B62, R4825 (2000). URL doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.62.R4825

  79. [83]

    4, 700 (2008)

    Utsunomiya, S.et al.Observation of Bogoliubov exci- tations in exciton-polariton condensates.Nature Phys. 4, 700 (2008). URLdoi:10.1038/nphys1034

  80. [84]

    & Ya- mamoto, Y

    Byrnes, T., Horikiri, T., Ishida, N., Fraser, M. & Ya- mamoto, Y. Negative bogoliubov dispersion in exciton- polariton condensates.Phys. Rev. B85, 075130 (2012). URLdoi:10.1103/physrevb.85.075130

Showing first 80 references.