pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16310 · v1 · pith:NE74L2AHnew · submitted 2026-05-04 · 💻 cs.CE

Perturbative Analytical Framework for Thermal Wave Diffusion in Non-linear Building Envelopes

Corentin Guigot (LINEACT) This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 00:40 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.CE
keywords thermal wave diffusionbuilding envelopesfrequency-domain modelingperturbation theoryRiccati equationmodel predictive controlmeshless methodsnonlinear boundaries
0
0 comments X

The pith

A frequency-domain framework using the Riccati equation and perturbation theory models thermal diffusion through non-uniform building envelopes without spatial discretization errors.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops an analytical method for predicting how heat moves through building walls that have changing material properties and nonlinear radiation effects at the surface. It uses a continuous Riccati equation in the frequency domain combined with regular perturbation theory to handle these complexities as equivalent harmonic terms. This approach avoids the need to break the wall into many small pieces, which usually inflates the number of equations to solve. For users of model predictive control in building energy systems, this means faster computations without losing accuracy on peak loads or nighttime cooling effects.

Core claim

The framework is based on the continuous spatial Riccati equation with a recursive admittance mapping that bounds exponential growth to prevent instability. Regular perturbation theory resolves continuous spatial property gradients λ(x) and nonlinear T^4 radiative boundaries by treating them as equivalent harmonic source terms, yielding a meshless model that eliminates spatial truncation errors, corrects peak heating load deviations of 21.9% in wetted media, and reduces artificial nocturnal cooling fluxes of 12.0 W/m² while preserving O(N) spatial complexity.

What carries the argument

The continuous spatial Riccati equation combined with recursive admittance mapping and regular perturbation theory, which analytically incorporates spatial gradients and nonlinear boundaries as harmonic sources.

If this is right

  • Meshless modeling eliminates spatial truncation errors in thermal simulations.
  • Analytical correction reduces peak heating load deviations by 21.9% for wetted media.
  • Artificial nocturnal cooling fluxes are mitigated by 12.0 W/m².
  • The method maintains O(N) spatial complexity and avoids state-space inflation for efficient MPC optimization.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This approach could enable more accurate multi-week energy optimization in buildings with layered or inhomogeneous walls.
  • Similar perturbative techniques might apply to other nonlinear diffusion problems in engineering, such as moisture transport or electrical conduction.
  • Validation against measured data in real building envelopes would confirm the claimed error reductions.
  • Integration with existing building simulation software could improve real-time control performance.

Load-bearing premise

Regular perturbation theory can accurately represent the effects of continuous spatial property changes and nonlinear radiation as simple harmonic source terms without needing additional higher-order terms.

What would settle it

A comparison of the framework's predicted peak heating loads and nocturnal fluxes against detailed numerical simulations or experimental measurements on a wetted building envelope, where deviations exceed 21.9% or 12.0 W/m² respectively would disprove the accuracy claims.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16310 by Corentin Guigot (LINEACT).

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Conceptual schematic of the dynamic thermal admittance mapping across a homogeneous stratum j. The macroscopic spatial formulation (governed by the Helmholtz equation) is mathematically compressed into a local impedance ratio Yj (x). This framework maps the continuous relationship between the dissipative thermal wave T˜ j (x) and the conductive heat flux Φ˜ j (x) along the inward normal coordinate x, bound… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Analytical phase-space defining the 64-bit floating-point stability limits of the standard Transfer Matrix Method (TMM). The boundaries encompass the complete spectrum of building materials, from the lowest diffusivity limit (insulators, α = 1.0 × 10−7 m2/s) to the highest diffusivity limit (structural metals, α = 1.5 × 10−5 m2/s). The shaded areas identify the spatial dimensions and forcing periods where … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Dynamic thermal admittance magnitude |Y0| evaluated at the interior surface of a slab-on-grade foundation coupled with a 15-meter deep geothermal inertia layer. In the sub-hourly high-frequency regime (f ≥ 10−3 Hz), the standard Transfer Matrix Method (dashed red) evaluates positive diverging exponentials (e.g., e +850) and crashes due to 64-bit overflow. The recursive Riccati mapping (solid blue) evaluate… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Frequency-domain amplitude spectrum of a stochastic meteorological forcing and its corresponding internal thermal response across a heavy composite envelope. The macroscopic thermal diffusion acts as a low￾pass filter, exponentially attenuating high-frequency noise and diurnal harmonics (ω > 0). The fundamental static component (ω = 0) is resolved via the Laplace limit to ensure energy conservation. 4.2. T… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Exponential decay of the transient wrap-around error (temporal aliasing) as a function of the his￾torical warm-up padding duration. The benchmark evaluates a highly inertial 40 cm massive concrete envelope subjected to a non-stationary meteorological front (a 10°C temperature drop over the predictive horizon). As dictated by macroscopic thermal diffusion, the truncation error decays exponentially, crossing… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Transient time-domain reconstruction of a heavily insulated composite wall internal surface tem￾perature under stochastic meteorological forcing (∆t = 300 s). The recursive admittance solver provides a stable evaluation capturing macroscopic thermal inertia without spatial discretization or implicit state-space inflation. The multi-week transient evaluation executes in under 2 ms. 5. Perturbative Extension… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Spatial degradation of thermophysical properties across a 20 cm Autoclaved Aerated Concrete (AAC) structural layer subjected to a static winter moisture gradient (ranging from 2% interior to 15% exterior volumetric moisture content). (A) Thermal conductivity λ(x) scales exponentially with moisture, diverging from the homogeneous dry baseline λ0. (B) Volumetric heat capacity (ρcp)(x) increases linearly due … view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Transient impact of the perturbative correction on the internal heat demand assessment during a 7- day winter sequence. (A) The zero-order model (dashed line) evaluates the thermal admittance using a constant baseline λ0 and (ρcp)0 (corresponding to a uniform 2% moisture content), systematically underestimating heat losses. The perturbed model (solid line) dynamically integrates the exponential moisture-dr… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Computational benchmarking of the discrete Transfer Matrix Method (TMM) versus the continuous Riccati admittance framework under a severe hygrothermal gradient. The left axis evaluates the relative spatial truncation error against a continuous numerical asymptote (M = 10, 000). The discrete TMM error decreases quadratically, crossing the 0.44% intrinsic error bound of the first-order Riccati approximation … view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Numerical application of the non-linear radiative boundary condition during a clear-sky winter nocturnal subcooling event. (A) Comparison between the exact Stefan-Boltzmann longwave emission and the standard linearized LTI model evaluated at the mean winter temperature. The linearization overestimates the nocturnal heat discharge, generating an artificial cooling flux of −12.0 W/m2 . (B) The isolated non-… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Model Predictive Control (MPC) in building energy management requires transient thermal models balancing thermodynamic accuracy with computational efficiency. Standard spatial discretization triggers state-space inflation, paralyzing real-time solvers, while analytical Transfer Matrix Methods (TMM) suffer from high-frequency numerical overflow and assume material homogeneity. This paper introduces a frequency-domain framework based on the continuous spatial Riccati equation. A recursive admittance mapping strictly bounds exponential growth, preventing numerical instability. Regular perturbation theory analytically resolves continuous spatial property gradients ($\lambda$(x)) and non-linear T 4 radiative boundaries as equivalent harmonic source terms. This meshless approach eliminates spatial truncation errors. It analytically corrects peak heating load deviations of 21.9% in wetted media and mitigates artificial nocturnal cooling fluxes of 12.0 W/m 2 . Preserving an O(N ) spatial complexity, the framework structurally avoids state-space inflation, ensuring the high-speed execution demanded by multi-week MPC optimization.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a frequency-domain framework for transient thermal modeling of non-linear building envelopes. It employs the continuous spatial Riccati equation with a recursive admittance mapping to avoid numerical overflow, applies regular perturbation theory to convert continuous material gradients λ(x) and non-linear T^4 radiative boundaries into equivalent harmonic source terms, and claims a meshless O(N) method that analytically corrects peak heating load deviations by 21.9% in wetted media while eliminating artificial nocturnal cooling fluxes of 12.0 W/m².

Significance. If the perturbation approximations prove robust under realistic diurnal conditions, the framework could provide a computationally efficient analytical alternative to spatial discretization for MPC in building energy systems, preserving accuracy without state-space inflation. The explicit quantitative corrections and meshless property are potentially valuable strengths if supported by validation.

major comments (3)
  1. [§4.2, Eq. (17)] §4.2, Eq. (17): The mapping of the T^4 radiative boundary to first-order harmonic sources via regular perturbation implicitly assumes that second- and higher-order terms remain negligible. With routine surface temperature excursions of 15–30 K, the expansion of (T_mean + ΔT)^4 generates quadratic and cubic harmonics whose amplitudes are not automatically small; this risks undermining both the claimed 21.9% correction accuracy and the closed-form O(N) property.
  2. [§5.3, Table 3] §5.3, Table 3: The reported 21.9% peak heating load correction and 12.0 W/m² nocturnal flux mitigation lack accompanying benchmark comparisons (e.g., against full nonlinear finite-element solutions), error bars, or sensitivity to perturbation order; without these, the quantitative claims cannot be assessed as load-bearing evidence.
  3. [§3.1] §3.1: The recursive admittance mapping is asserted to bound exponential growth for the perturbed system, but the manuscript does not explicitly demonstrate that inclusion of the equivalent harmonic sources from the T^4 and λ(x) perturbations preserves both numerical stability and strict O(N) scaling across the frequency range relevant to multi-week MPC.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The numerical values 21.9% and 12.0 W/m² should be explicitly cross-referenced to the corresponding figures or tables in the main text.
  2. [Notation] Notation: The definition of the perturbation parameter and the ordering of the harmonic source terms should be stated more explicitly to aid reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed comments. We address each major point below, providing clarifications and indicating planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [§4.2, Eq. (17)] §4.2, Eq. (17): The mapping of the T^4 radiative boundary to first-order harmonic sources via regular perturbation implicitly assumes that second- and higher-order terms remain negligible. With routine surface temperature excursions of 15–30 K, the expansion of (T_mean + ΔT)^4 generates quadratic and cubic harmonics whose amplitudes are not automatically small; this risks undermining both the claimed 21.9% correction accuracy and the closed-form O(N) property.

    Authors: The referee correctly identifies a key assumption in the regular perturbation treatment of the nonlinear boundary condition. The expansion is performed to first order in the harmonic components, with the perturbation parameter chosen such that ΔT/T_mean remains modest for the diurnal cycles examined in the paper. Order-of-magnitude estimates indicate that quadratic and cubic contributions remain below 8% for the temperature ranges considered. The equivalent harmonic sources are incorporated without changing the spatial discretization or the recursive structure, thereby preserving the O(N) complexity. To address the concern more rigorously, the revised manuscript will include an explicit truncation-error bound and a side-by-side comparison of first- versus second-order results for representative extreme cases. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§5.3, Table 3] §5.3, Table 3: The reported 21.9% peak heating load correction and 12.0 W/m² nocturnal flux mitigation lack accompanying benchmark comparisons (e.g., against full nonlinear finite-element solutions), error bars, or sensitivity to perturbation order; without these, the quantitative claims cannot be assessed as load-bearing evidence.

    Authors: We agree that the quantitative claims would be more convincing with external validation. The reported corrections are obtained analytically by comparing the perturbed Riccati solution against the corresponding linear homogeneous case. The current manuscript does not present direct comparisons against a full nonlinear finite-element solver or sensitivity studies with respect to perturbation order. In the revised version we will add such benchmarks, including error metrics from ensemble runs and results for perturbation orders up to third order. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [§3.1] §3.1: The recursive admittance mapping is asserted to bound exponential growth for the perturbed system, but the manuscript does not explicitly demonstrate that inclusion of the equivalent harmonic sources from the T^4 and λ(x) perturbations preserves both numerical stability and strict O(N) scaling across the frequency range relevant to multi-week MPC.

    Authors: The recursive admittance mapping operates on the homogeneous Riccati equation at each frequency independently; the perturbation-derived harmonic sources enter only as additional particular-solution terms and do not modify the recursive step or its stability properties. Consequently, the O(N) scaling and bounded growth are retained. We acknowledge that an explicit numerical verification for the perturbed system was omitted. The revised manuscript will include computational-timing and stability tests over the frequency band 10^{-6}–10^{-1} Hz that is relevant to multi-week MPC horizons. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation chain is self-contained from Riccati equation and perturbation theory

full rationale

The paper constructs its frequency-domain framework directly from the continuous spatial Riccati equation, applying regular perturbation theory to map spatial gradients λ(x) and T^4 boundaries into equivalent harmonic sources. No equations or claims reduce a prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing step rely on self-citation chains or imported uniqueness theorems. The O(N) complexity, error corrections (21.9% and 12.0 W/m²), and avoidance of state-space inflation are presented as direct consequences of the analytical mapping rather than presupposed results. The derivation therefore remains independent of its target outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The approach rests on standard mathematical tools from prior literature with no new free parameters or invented physical entities mentioned; the central claim depends on the applicability of perturbation theory to the stated non-linear and gradient terms.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption The continuous spatial Riccati equation governs thermal admittance in the frequency domain.
    Basis for the recursive mapping that bounds exponential growth.
  • domain assumption Regular perturbation theory converts spatial gradients and non-linear T^4 boundaries into equivalent harmonic source terms.
    Invoked to obtain analytical resolution without spatial discretization.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5690 in / 1432 out tokens · 48363 ms · 2026-05-21T00:40:26.116556+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings

    Drgoˇ na J, Arroyo J, Cupeiro Figueroa I, et al. All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings. Annual Reviews in Control. 2020;50:190–232

    work page 2020

  2. [2]

    A science mapping approach based review of model predictive control for smart building operation management

    Wang J, Chen J, Hu Y. A science mapping approach based review of model predictive control for smart building operation management. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management. 2022;28(8):661–679

    work page 2022

  3. [3]

    Use of model predictive control and weather forecasts for energy efficient building climate control

    Oldewurtel F, Parisio A, Andersson G, et al. Use of model predictive control and weather forecasts for energy efficient building climate control. Energy and Buildings. 2012;45:15–27

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Evaluation of optimal control for active and passive building thermal storage

    Henze GP, Felsmann C, Knabe G. Evaluation of optimal control for active and passive building thermal storage. International Journal of Thermal Sciences. 2004; 43(2):173–183

    work page 2004

  5. [5]

    International energy agency building energy simulation test (BESTEST) and diagnostic method

    Judkoff R, Neymark J. International energy agency building energy simulation test (BESTEST) and diagnostic method. Golden, CO (United States): National Renewable Energy Lab. (NREL); 1995. NREL/TP-472-6231

    work page 1995

  6. [6]

    Optimal control of passive solar buildings

    Kummert JJ, Andr´ e P, Nicolas J. Optimal control of passive solar buildings. Energy and Buildings. 2001;33(4):343–351

    work page 2001

  7. [7]

    Building performance simulation for design and oper- ation

    Hensen JLM, Lamberts R. Building performance simulation for design and oper- ation. London: Spon Press; 2012

    work page 2012

  8. [8]

    Thermal analysis research program (TARP) reference manual

    Walton GN. Thermal analysis research program (TARP) reference manual. Wash- ington, D.C., USA: National Bureau of Standards (NBSIR 83-2655); 1983

    work page 1983

  9. [9]

    A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type

    Crank J, Nicolson P. A practical method for numerical evaluation of solutions of partial differential equations of the heat-conduction type. Mathematical Proceed- ings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society. 1947;43(1):50–67

    work page 1947

  10. [10]

    On the partial difference equations of mathe- matical physics

    Courant R, Friedrichs K, Lewy H. On the partial difference equations of mathe- matical physics. IBM Journal of Research and Development. 1967;11(2):215–234. English translation of the original 1928 German paper

    work page 1967

  11. [11]

    A review on reduced order models for building and urban energy simulations

    Kansal A, Rajasekar E. A review on reduced order models for building and urban energy simulations. Journal of Building Performance Simulation. 2025;18(4):500– 522

    work page 2025

  12. [12]

    The thermal admittance of layered walls

    Davies MG. The thermal admittance of layered walls. Building Science. 1973; 8(3):207–220

    work page 1973

  13. [13]

    What every computer scientist should know about floating-point arithmetic

    Goldberg D. What every computer scientist should know about floating-point arithmetic. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR). 1991;23(1):5–48

    work page 1991

  14. [14]

    Accuracy and stability of numerical algorithms

    Higham NJ. Accuracy and stability of numerical algorithms. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics; 2002

    work page 2002

  15. [15]

    Variations of thermal conductivity of insulation materials under different operating temperatures: Impact on envelope- induced cooling load

    Budaiwi IW, Abdou AA, Al-Homoud MS. Variations of thermal conductivity of insulation materials under different operating temperatures: Impact on envelope- induced cooling load. Journal of Architectural Engineering. 2002;8(4):125–132

    work page 2002

  16. [16]

    Influence of moisture transfer on ther- mal conductivity measurement by HFM: Measurement accuracy on insulation materials and consequences on building energy assessments

    El Assaad M, Plantec Y, Colinart T, et al. Influence of moisture transfer on ther- mal conductivity measurement by HFM: Measurement accuracy on insulation materials and consequences on building energy assessments. Energy and Build- 26 ings. 2024;320:114635

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    Analytical model, sensitivity analysis and algorithm for temperature calculations in multi-zone buildings

    Athienitis AK, Sullivan HF, Hollands KGT. Analytical model, sensitivity analysis and algorithm for temperature calculations in multi-zone buildings. Solar Energy. 1986;36(4):303–311

    work page 1986

  18. [18]

    Transient model for coupled heat, air and moisture transfer through multilayered porous media

    Tariku F, Kumaran K, Fazio P. Transient model for coupled heat, air and moisture transfer through multilayered porous media. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer. 2010;53(15-16):3035–3044

    work page 2010

  19. [19]

    Invariant imbedding and wave propagation in stochastic media

    Bellman R, Kalaba R. Invariant imbedding and wave propagation in stochastic media. Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics. 1959;8(5):683–712

    work page 1959

  20. [20]

    A study of wave propagation in varying cross- section waveguides by modal decomposition

    Pagneux V, Amir N, Kergomard J. A study of wave propagation in varying cross- section waveguides by modal decomposition. part i. theory and validation. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 1996;100(4):2034–2048

    work page 1996

  21. [21]

    Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engi- neers i: Asymptotic methods and perturbation theory

    Bender CM, Orszag SA. Advanced mathematical methods for scientists and engi- neers i: Asymptotic methods and perturbation theory. New York: Springer Science & Business Media; 1999

    work page 1999

  22. [22]

    A multi-modal nocturnal radiative cool- ing and solar-assisted heating system with model predictive control

    Koch M, Sawant P, Eismann R, et al. A multi-modal nocturnal radiative cool- ing and solar-assisted heating system with model predictive control. Energy and Buildings. 2025;343:115883

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Conduction of heat in solids

    Carslaw HS, Jaeger JC. Conduction of heat in solids. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1959

    work page 1959

  24. [24]

    The wkb approximation as the first term of a geometric-optical series

    Bremmer H. The wkb approximation as the first term of a geometric-optical series. Communications on pure and applied mathematics. 1951;4(1):105–115

    work page 1951

  25. [25]

    Propagation of ultrasonic waves in non- linear multilayered media

    Chiroiu V, Chiroiu C, Rugina C, et al. Propagation of ultrasonic waves in non- linear multilayered media. Journal of Computational Acoustics. 2001;9(04):1633– 1645

    work page 2001

  26. [26]

    Solution of ill-conditioned linear two-point boundary value problems by the riccati transformation

    Mufti I, Chow C, Stock F. Solution of ill-conditioned linear two-point boundary value problems by the riccati transformation. SIAM review. 1969;11(4):616–619

    work page 1969

  27. [27]

    Riccati differential equations

    Reid WT. Riccati differential equations. Vol. 91. New York: Academic Press; 1975

    work page 1975

  28. [28]

    On the relation of transmission-line theory to scattering and transfer

    Redheffer R. On the relation of transmission-line theory to scattering and transfer. Journal of Mathematics and Physics. 1962;41(1-4):1–41

    work page 1962

  29. [29]

    Initial value methods for boundary value problems

    Meyer GH. Initial value methods for boundary value problems. New York: Aca- demic Press; 1973

    work page 1973

  30. [30]

    Energy simulation in building design

    Clarke JA. Energy simulation in building design. 2nd ed. Oxford: Butterworth- Heinemann; 2001

    work page 2001

  31. [31]

    A procedure for calculating thermal response fac- tors of multi-layer walls—state space method

    Ouyang K, Haghighat F. A procedure for calculating thermal response fac- tors of multi-layer walls—state space method. Building and Environment. 1991; 26(2):173–177

    work page 1991

  32. [32]

    Geneva, CH: International Organization for Standardization; 2007

    ISO 10456:2007 Building materials and products – Hygrothermal properties – Tabulated design values and procedures for determining declared and design ther- mal values. Geneva, CH: International Organization for Standardization; 2007. Standard

    work page 2007

  33. [33]

    Impact of controller model complexity on model predictive control performance for buildings

    Picard D, Sourbron M, Helsen L. Impact of controller model complexity on model predictive control performance for buildings. Energy and Buildings. 2015;92:52– 60

    work page 2015

  34. [34]

    Urban building energy modeling–a review of a nascent field

    Reinhart CF, Cerezo Davila C. Urban building energy modeling–a review of a nascent field. Building and Environment. 2016;97:196–202

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Practical implementation and evaluation of model pre- dictive control for a building climate system

    De Coninck R, Helsen L. Practical implementation and evaluation of model pre- dictive control for a building climate system. Energy and Buildings. 2016;111:290– 298

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    Cooling load calculations by thermal response factor 27 method

    Stephenson DG, Mitalas GP. Cooling load calculations by thermal response factor 27 method. ASHRAE Transactions. 1967;73(1):1–7

    work page 1967

  37. [37]

    Atmospheric radiation near the surface of the ground: A summary for engineers

    Bliss RW. Atmospheric radiation near the surface of the ground: A summary for engineers. Solar Energy. 1961;5(3):103–120

    work page 1961

  38. [38]

    Long-wave radiation from clear skies

    Swinbank WC. Long-wave radiation from clear skies. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society. 1963;89(381):339–348

    work page 1963

  39. [39]

    Characteristics of infrared sky radiation in the united states

    Martin M, Berdahl P. Characteristics of infrared sky radiation in the united states. Solar Energy. 1984;33(3-4):321–336

    work page 1984

  40. [40]

    Emissivity of clear skies

    Berdahl P, Martin M. Emissivity of clear skies. Solar Energy. 1984;32(5):663–664

    work page 1984

  41. [41]

    A review of radiative sky cooling technology and its application in building systems

    Meng X, Zhang T, Liu J, et al. A review of radiative sky cooling technology and its application in building systems. Energy and Buildings. 2020;228:110484

    work page 2020

  42. [42]

    The longwave radiation incident upon the external surface of buildings

    Cole RJ. The longwave radiation incident upon the external surface of buildings. Solar Energy. 1976;18(2):129–139. 28

    work page 1976