pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16670 · v1 · pith:477A5TLDnew · submitted 2026-05-15 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

The Torques Acting on Accreting Millisecond X-Ray Pulsars in the Outburst and Quiescent States, and During the Long-Term Evolution

Fatmanur Ertugrul , Ali Arda Gencali , Unal Ertan , Ndiogou Niang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 15:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords accreting millisecond X-ray pulsarstorquesoutburstquiescencelong-term evolutionLMXBsspin-upspin-down
0
0 comments X

The pith

A standard torque model from low-mass X-ray binaries accounts for the observed spin-up, spin-down, and long-term slowing of five accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper applies an existing torque model developed for typical low-mass X-ray binaries to five accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars. It finds that the combined torques from disc-magnetosphere interaction, magnetic dipole radiation, and mass accretion reproduce the measured X-ray luminosities and the pattern of spin-up during outbursts, spin-down in quiescence, and net slowing over long timescales. The results are consistent with the sources being in the final evolutionary stages of low-mass X-ray binaries. Uncertainties in timing noise and bolometric corrections prevent ruling out additional spin-down from gravitational radiation.

Core claim

The torques produced by the disc-magnetosphere interaction, the magnetic dipole radiation, and the mass accretion are compatible with the X-ray luminosity and rotational properties of the sources in their outburst and quiescent states, and during the resultant long-term evolution.

What carries the argument

The torque model combining disc-magnetosphere interaction torques with magnetic dipole radiation and mass-accretion torques, applied to outburst and quiescent states to track net angular momentum changes.

If this is right

  • Most of the systems spin up during outbursts and spin down in quiescence.
  • The sources experience net spin-down over long timescales.
  • The model reproduces the observed X-ray luminosities and rotational properties without requiring major adjustments.
  • Gravitational radiation torques remain possible but are not required by current data.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the model holds, these five sources are confirmed as late-stage low-mass X-ray binaries approaching the end of mass transfer.
  • Improved timing observations with reduced noise could distinguish gravitational-wave spin-down from the magnetic and accretion torques.
  • The same torque framework may apply to other transient accreting pulsars once bolometric corrections are refined.

Load-bearing premise

The torque model developed for typical low-mass X-ray binary behavior applies directly to these five accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars, and bolometric corrections for X-ray luminosity are accurate enough to separate the different torque contributions.

What would settle it

A measurement showing that the observed spin frequency derivative during an outburst or quiescence period deviates significantly from the value predicted by the combined disc-magnetosphere, dipole, and accretion torques at the measured X-ray luminosity.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16670 by Ali Arda Gencali, Fatmanur Ertugrul, Ndiogou Niang, Unal Ertan.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: The model curves for XTE J1751−305. (a) The variation of 𝑅in (upper panel) and 𝑃¤ (lower panel) with 𝑀¤ in across the SP (dashed purple curve), WP (solid purple curve), and SU (solid black curve) phases. All these model curves are obtained with 𝑃 = 2.3 ms, Δ𝑟/𝑟in = 0.25, 𝜂 = 0.8, and 𝜉 = 0.8. In the top panel, red dot-dashed curve shows the 𝑅𝜂 solution and the turquoise dashed line represents the 𝑅𝜉 . In t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: The model curves for IGR J17494−3030. The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: The model curves for Swift J1756.9−2508. The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The model curves for IGR J17511−3057. The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The model curves for IGR J00291+5934. The same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The model curves are produced with the same model parameters used in Figs 1–5, but with 𝐵 = 1.0 × 108 G and different 𝑃 values (given in the figure). The solid curves are obtained with the analytical model described in Section 2. The dotted horizontal lines show the 𝑃¤ values produced only by Γdip. The dashed curves are given by the torque formulas employed by BC2017. of 𝑀¤ in. This is mainly due to the pr… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Accreting millisecond X-ray pulsars (AMXPs) are transient X-ray sources likely to be in the final evolutionary phases of low-mass X-ray binaries (LMXBs). In this work, we have investigated the torque and X-ray luminosity variations of five AMXPs during outburst and quiescence, using a model previously employed to explain some typical behaviours of LMXBs. Most of these systems spin up in the outburst state and spin down in quiescence, while they slow down on the long term. We have obtained reasonable results with the model in agreement with these observations. We have found that the torques produced by the disc-magnetosphere interaction, the magnetic dipole radiation, and the mass accretion are compatible with the X-ray luminosity and rotational properties of the sources in their outburst and quiescent states, and during the resultant long-term evolution. Nevertheless, our results are not sufficient to rule out the spin-down contribution of the gravitational radiation torques due to significant timing noise and uncertainties about the bolometric corrections for X-ray luminosity during the outbursts of some sources.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript applies a torque model previously used for LMXBs to five AMXPs, analyzing variations in torque and X-ray luminosity during outburst and quiescence. It reports that the combined effects of disc-magnetosphere interaction, magnetic dipole radiation, and mass accretion torques are compatible with the observed spin-up in outburst, spin-down in quiescence, and long-term spin-down, while noting that timing noise and bolometric correction uncertainties prevent ruling out gravitational radiation contributions.

Significance. If the compatibility claims can be made robust against the acknowledged uncertainties, the work would support extending standard accretion torque models to the AMXP population and clarify their evolutionary connection to LMXBs. However, the current analysis provides only weak constraints, limiting its broader impact on understanding spin evolution or torque balance in these systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the torques 'are compatible with the X-ray luminosity and rotational properties' is not load-bearing because the text itself states that 'significant timing noise and uncertainties about the bolometric corrections for X-ray luminosity during the outbursts of some sources' prevent ruling out gravitational radiation. A factor-of-two variation in bolometric corrections (common in AMXP studies) would shift the inferred accretion torque enough to accommodate or exclude the modeled components within the reported noise, rendering the test non-discriminating.
  2. [Model application section (likely §2–3)] Model application section (likely §2–3): The manuscript does not specify whether the torque equations (disc-magnetosphere, dipole radiation, accretion) are used with independently measured parameters or adjusted to fit the observed spin derivatives and luminosities for the five sources. Without explicit parameter tables or a sensitivity analysis to bolometric corrections and timing noise, it is unclear if the 'reasonable results' constitute an independent test or a post-hoc consistency check.
minor comments (2)
  1. The full data analysis details, including how outburst and quiescent luminosities and spin derivatives were extracted for each of the five sources, should be expanded or referenced to allow reproducibility.
  2. Clarify the exact form of the disc-magnetosphere torque formula employed and any assumptions about the magnetospheric radius relative to the corotation radius.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful review and constructive feedback. We respond to each major comment below, indicating where revisions will be made to clarify the analysis and strengthen the presentation.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: The central claim that the torques 'are compatible with the X-ray luminosity and rotational properties' is not load-bearing because the text itself states that 'significant timing noise and uncertainties about the bolometric corrections for X-ray luminosity during the outbursts of some sources' prevent ruling out gravitational radiation. A factor-of-two variation in bolometric corrections (common in AMXP studies) would shift the inferred accretion torque enough to accommodate or exclude the modeled components within the reported noise, rendering the test non-discriminating.

    Authors: We agree that the acknowledged uncertainties in timing noise and bolometric corrections limit the strength of the conclusions, which is why the manuscript already states that gravitational radiation torques cannot be ruled out. The analysis demonstrates consistency of the standard torques with the data within those uncertainties rather than a strong exclusion of alternatives. We will revise the abstract to emphasize this as a consistency check and add a brief quantitative discussion of how factor-of-two changes in bolometric corrections propagate into the torque balance. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Model application section (likely §2–3)] Model application section (likely §2–3): The manuscript does not specify whether the torque equations (disc-magnetosphere, dipole radiation, accretion) are used with independently measured parameters or adjusted to fit the observed spin derivatives and luminosities for the five sources. Without explicit parameter tables or a sensitivity analysis to bolometric corrections and timing noise, it is unclear if the 'reasonable results' constitute an independent test or a post-hoc consistency check.

    Authors: The torque model is applied using parameters drawn from independent literature measurements (spin frequencies, orbital periods, and magnetic field estimates from other observables) for each source, with the resulting torques then compared to the observed spin derivatives and luminosities. To remove ambiguity, we will add an explicit table of all input parameters and their references, together with a sensitivity analysis showing the effect of plausible variations in bolometric corrections and timing noise amplitudes on the compatibility conclusions. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: established torque model applied to new sources with compatibility check

full rationale

The paper applies a torque model previously employed for LMXBs to five AMXPs and reports that disc-magnetosphere, dipole radiation, and accretion torques are compatible with observed X-ray luminosities and spin properties in outburst, quiescence, and long-term evolution. This constitutes an application and consistency test of an external model rather than a derivation that reduces to its own inputs by construction. No equations are shown to be self-definitional, no fitted parameters are renamed as independent predictions, and the cited model is treated as prior independent work. The abstract explicitly notes limitations from timing noise and bolometric corrections, confirming the analysis does not force results tautologically. The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only abstract available so specific free parameters, axioms, and entities from the full model cannot be audited; the central approach rests on reuse of a prior LMXB torque model.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The torque model previously employed for LMXBs applies directly to these AMXPs
    Stated in abstract as the basis for investigating the five sources.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5750 in / 1307 out tokens · 68478 ms · 2026-05-20T15:19:54.024682+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

121 extracted references · 121 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Observational appearance

    Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. , year = 1973, volume = 24, pages =

    work page 1973

  2. [2]

    Raine , isbn =

    Juhan Frank and Andrew King and Derek J. Raine , isbn =. Cambridge University Press , pages =

    work page

  3. [3]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Guillaume Dubus and Jean Pierre Lasota and Jean Marie Hameury and Phil Charles , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  4. [4]

    New Astronomy Reviews , keywords =

    Jean Pierre Lasota , doi =. New Astronomy Reviews , keywords =

    work page

  5. [5]

    M. A. Alpar and A. F. Cheng and M. A. Ruderman and J. Shaham , doi =. Nature , keywords =

    work page

  6. [6]

    Current Science , year = 1982, month = dec, volume =

    On the origin of the recently discovered ultra-rapid pulsar. Current Science , year = 1982, month = dec, volume =

    work page 1982

  7. [8]

    Papitto and M

    A. Papitto and M. T. Menna and L. Burderi and T. Di Salvo and A. Riggio , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  8. [11]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Marek Gierliński and Juri Poutanen , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  9. [12]

    Sanna and F

    A. Sanna and F. Pintore and A. Riggio and S. M. Mazzola and E. Bozzo and T. Di Salvo and C. Ferrigno and A. F. Gambino and A. Papitto and R. Iaria and L. Burderi , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  10. [13]

    Falanga and L

    M. Falanga and L. Kuiper and J. Poutanen and D. K. Galloway and E. W. Bonning and E. Bozzo and A. Goldwurm and W. Hermsen and L. Stella , doi =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    work page

  11. [14]

    Papitto and A

    A. Papitto and A. Riggio and T. Di Salvo and L. Burderi and A. D'Aì and R. Iaria and E. Bozzo and M. T. Menna , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  12. [15]

    Ho , doi =

    Brynmor Haskell and Nathalie Degenaar and Wynn C.G. Ho , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  13. [16]

    Bozzo and C

    E. Bozzo and C. Ferrigno and M. Falanga and S. Campana and J. A. Kennea and A. Papitto , doi =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    work page

  14. [18]

    Altamirano and A

    D. Altamirano and A. Watts and M. Linares and C. B. Markwardt and T. Strohmayer and A. Patruno , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  15. [19]

    Ray and Peter Bult and Deepto Chakrabarty and Gaurava K

    Mason Ng and Paul S. Ray and Peter Bult and Deepto Chakrabarty and Gaurava K. Jaisawal and Christian Malacaria and Diego Altamirano and Zaven Arzoumanian and Keith C. Gendreau and Tolga Güver and Matthew Kerr and Tod E. Strohmayer and Zorawar Wadiasingh and Michael T. Wolff , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , month =

    work page

  16. [20]

    Wijnands and N

    Armas Padilla, M and R. Wijnands and N. Degenaar , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , keywords =

    work page

  17. [21]

    Falanga and L

    M. Falanga and L. Kuiper and J. Poutanen and E. W. Bonning and W. Hermsen and T. Di Salvo and P. Goldoni and A. Goldwurm and S. E. Shaw and L. Stella , doi =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    work page

  18. [22]

    P. G. Jonker and S. Campana and D. Steeghs and M. A.P. Torres and D. K. Galloway and C. B. Markwardt and D. Chakrabarty and J. Swank , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  19. [23]

    Paizis and M

    A. Paizis and M. A. Nowak and J. Wilms and T. J.L. Courvoisier and K. Ebisawa and J. Rodriguez and P. Ubertini , doi =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    work page

  20. [24]

    Papitto and A

    A. Papitto and A. Riggio and L. Burderi and T. Di Salvo and A. D'Aí and R. Iaria , doi =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    work page

  21. [25]

    Sanna and F

    A. Sanna and F. Pintore and E. Bozzo and C. Ferrigno and A. Papitto and A. Riggio and T. Di Salvo and R. Iaria and A. D'Aì and E. Egron and L. Burderi , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  22. [26]

    Hartman and Duncan K

    Jacob M. Hartman and Duncan K. Galloway and Deepto Chakrabarty , doi =. Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    work page

  23. [28]

    The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    Alessandro Patruno , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    work page

  24. [30]

    The Astrophysical Journal , month =

    Alessandro Patruno , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =

    work page

  25. [32]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    Dipanjan Mukherjee and Peter Bult and Michiel Van Derklis and Dipankar Bhattacharya , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  26. [33]

    Galloway and Craig B

    Duncan K. Galloway and Craig B. Markwardt and Edward H. Morgan and Deepto Chakrabarty and Tod E. Strohmayer , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =

    work page

  27. [34]

    The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    Sudip Bhattacharyya and Deepto Chakrabarty , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    work page

  28. [35]

    C. R. D'Angelo , doi =. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , keywords =

    work page

  29. [36]

    Luciano Burderi and Andrea Possenti and Francesca D ' Antona and Tiziana Di Salvo and Marta Burgay and Luigi Stella and Maria Teresa Menna and Rosario Iaria and Sergio Campana and Nichi D'amico , journal =

    work page

  30. [37]

    Gendreau and Sebastien Guillot and Wynn C

    Peter Bult and Diego Altamirano and Zaven Arzoumanian and Deepto Chakrabarty and Keith C. Gendreau and Sebastien Guillot and Wynn C. G. Ho and Gaurava K. Jaisawal and Steven Lentine and Craig B. Markwardt and Son N. Ngo and John S. Pope and Paul. S. Ray and Maxine R. Saylor and Tod E. Strohmayer , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =

    work page

  31. [38]

    Papitto and E

    A. Papitto and E. Bozzo and C. Sanchez-Fernandez and P. Romano and D. F. Torres and C. Ferrigno and J. J.E. Kajava and E. Kuulkers , doi =. Astronomy and Astrophysics , keywords =

    work page

  32. [39]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    IGR J00291+5934 is a 598 Hz X-ray Pulsar. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page

  33. [44]

    Burderi and T

    L. Burderi and T. Di Salvo and M. T. Menna and A. Riggio and A. Papitto , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , keywords =

    work page

  34. [46]

    Markwardt and Deepto Chakrabarty , doi =

    Manuel Linares and Rudy Wijnands and Michiel van der Klis and Hans Krimm and Craig B. Markwardt and Deepto Chakrabarty , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal , month =

    work page

  35. [48]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    A new hard X-ray transient discovered by INTEGRAL: IGR J17494-3030. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page

  36. [49]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    2012 Chandra Non-Detection of the Fading X-ray Transient IGR J17494-3030. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page 2012

  37. [50]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    NICER detection of 376 Hz X-ray pulsations from IGR J17494-3030. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page

  38. [53]

    C. B. Markwardt and H. A. Krimm and J. H. Swank , journal =

    work page

  39. [54]

    I. A. Mereminskiy and S. A. Grebenev and R. A. Krivonos and R. A. Sunyaev , journal =

    work page

  40. [55]

    Sanna and F

    A. Sanna and F. Pintore and A. Riggio and L. Burderi and A. F. Gambino and K. C. Gendreau and Z. Arzoumanian and P. M. Bult and T. di Salvo and R. Iaria and C. Ferrigno and E. Bozzo and A. Papitto , journal =

    work page

  41. [56]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    Chandra non-detection of the newly discovered Millisecond X-ray Pulsar SWIFT J1756.9-2508. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page

  42. [57]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    INTEGRAL discovered a new hard X-ray source: IGRJ17511-3057. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page

  43. [58]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    RXTE and Swift: IGR J17511-3057 fading, XTE J1751-305 detected. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page

  44. [59]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    INTEGRAL detects a new outburst from the millisecond X-ray pulsar IGR J17511-3057. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page

  45. [60]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    The onset of a new outburst from the millisecond X-ray pulsar IGR J17511-3057 as detected by INTEGRAL. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page

  46. [61]

    The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    IGR J00291+5934, a new X-ray transient discovered with INTEGRAL. The Astronomer's Telegram , keywords =

    work page

  47. [62]

    Finger and Danny T

    Lars Bildsten and Deepto Chakrabarty and John Chiu and Mark H. Finger and Danny T. Koh and Robert W. Nelson and Thomas A. Prince and Bradley C. Rubin and D. Matthew Scott and Mark Stollberg and Brian A. Vaughan and Colleen A. Wilson and Robert B. Wilson , doi =. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , keywords =

    work page

  48. [67]

    Patruno and C

    A. Patruno and C. B. Markwardt and T. E. Strohmayer and J. H. Swank and S. E. Smith and D. Pereira , journal =

    work page

  49. [68]

    Chakrabarty and J

    D. Chakrabarty and J. H. Swank and C. B. Markwardt and E. Smith , journal =

    work page

  50. [69]

    Sanna and F

    A. Sanna and F. Pintore and A. Riggio and L. Burderi and T. Di Salvo and R. Iaria and F. Scarano and A. Papitto and E. Bozzo , journal =

    work page

  51. [82]

    , keywords =

    Outbursts in dwarf novae accretion disks. , keywords =

    work page

  52. [83]

    , keywords =

    Absolute visual magnitudes of low-mass X-ray binaries. , keywords =

    work page

  53. [86]

    A., Cheng A

    Alpar M. A., Cheng A. F., Ruderman M. A., Shaham J., 1982, @doi [Nature] 10.1038/300728A0 , 300, 728

    work page doi:10.1038/300728a0 1982

  54. [87]

    , keywords =

    Altamirano D., Watts A., Linares M., Markwardt C. B., Strohmayer T., Patruno A., 2010, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17369.x , 409, 1136

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17369.x 2010

  55. [88]

    M., et al., 2009, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1172740 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Sci...324.1411A 324, 1411

    Archibald A. M., et al., 2009, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1172740 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009Sci...324.1411A 324, 1411

    work page doi:10.1126/science.1172740 2009

  56. [89]

    Armas Padilla M., Wijnands R., Degenaar N., 2013, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1093/mnrasl/slt119 , 436

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slt119 2013

  57. [90]

    Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 1--62, @doi 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_94-1 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_94-1

    Bahramian A., Degenaar N., 2022, Low-Mass X-ray Binaries. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 1--62, @doi 10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_94-1 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_94-1

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-16-4544-0_94-1 2022

  58. [91]

    Baldovin C., et al., 2009, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ATel.2196....1B 2196, 1

    work page 2009

  59. [92]

    G., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441.1825B 441, 1825

    Bassa C. G., et al., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stu708 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.441.1825B 441, 1825

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stu708 2014

  60. [93]

    Bhattacharyya S., Chakrabarty D., 2017, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/4 , 835, 4

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/835/1/4 2017

  61. [94]

    Bildsten L., 1998, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/311440 , 501, L89

    work page doi:10.1086/311440 1998

  62. [95]

    Bildsten L., et al., 1997, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series] 10.1086/313060/XML , 113, 367

    work page doi:10.1086/313060/xml 1997

  63. [96]

    Boissay R., et al., 2012, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ATel.3984....1B 3984, 1

    work page 2012

  64. [97]

    Bozzo E., et al., 2015, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ATel.7275....1B 7275, 1

    work page 2015

  65. [98]

    Bult P., et al., 2018, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.3847/1538-4357/aad5e5 , 864, 14

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/aad5e5 2018

  66. [99]

    D., Menna M

    Burderi L., Salvo T. D., Menna M. T., Riggio A., Papitto A., 2006, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/510666/FULLTEXT/ , 653, L133

    work page doi:10.1086/510666/fulltext/ 2006

  67. [100]

    Burderi L., et al., 2007, @doi [The Astrophysical Journal] 10.1086/510659 , 657, 961

    work page doi:10.1086/510659 2007

  68. [101]

    G., Markwardt C

    Chakrabarty D., Jonker P. G., Markwardt C. B., 2013, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ATel.4886....1C 4886, 1

    work page 2013

  69. [102]

    R., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/MNRAS/STX1306 , 470, 3316

    D'Angelo C. R., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/MNRAS/STX1306 , 470, 3316

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1306 2017

  70. [103]

    K., Poutanen J., Ferrigno C., Stella L., Falanga M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629575 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...599A..88D 599, A88

    De Falco V., Kuiper L., Bozzo E., Galloway D. K., Poutanen J., Ferrigno C., Stella L., Falanga M., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629575 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017A&A...599A..88D 599, A88

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201629575 2017

  71. [104]

    Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 87--124, @doi 10.1007/978-3-030-85198-9_4 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85198-9_4

    Di Salvo T., Sanna A., 2022, in Bhattacharyya S., Papitto A., Bhattacharya D., eds, , Millisecond Pulsars. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 87--124, @doi 10.1007/978-3-030-85198-9_4 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85198-9_4

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-85198-9_4 2022

  72. [105]

    Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 4031--4103, @doi 10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7_103 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7_103

    Di Salvo T., Papitto A., Marino A., Iaria R., Burderi L., 2024, Low-Magnetic-Field Neutron Stars in X-ray Binaries. Springer Nature Singapore, Singapore, pp 4031--4103, @doi 10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7_103 , https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7_103

    work page doi:10.1007/978-981-19-6960-7_103 2024

  73. [106]

    , keywords =

    Dubus G., Lasota J. P., Hameury J. M., Charles P., 1999, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1046/J.1365-8711.1999.02212.X/2/303-1-139-FIG010.JPEG , 303, 139

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02212.x/2/303-1-139-fig010.jpeg 1999

  74. [107]

    Eckert D., Walter R., Kretschmar P., Mas-Hesse M., Palumbo G. G. C., Roques J.-P., Ubertini P., Winkler C., 2004, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ATel..352....1E 352, 1

    work page 2004

  75. [108]

    Ertan \"U ., 2017, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/MNRAS/STW3131 , 466, 175

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stw3131 2017

  76. [109]

    Ertan \"U ., 2018, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1093/MNRASL/SLY089 , 479, L12

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/sly089 2018

  77. [110]

    Ertan \"U ., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society] 10.1093/MNRAS/STAA3378 , 500, 2928

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3378 2021

  78. [111]

    A., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1093/mnrasl/slab060 , 505, L112

    Ertan \"U ., Alpar M. A., 2021, @doi [Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters] 10.1093/mnrasl/slab060 , 505, L112

    work page doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slab060 2021

  79. [112]

    Falanga M., et al., 2005, @doi [Astronomy and Astrophysics] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053472 , 444, 15

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20053472 2005

  80. [113]

    J., 2002, Cambridge University Press, 39, 398

    Frank J., King A., Raine D. J., 2002, Cambridge University Press, 39, 398

    work page 2002

Showing first 80 references.