pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.16870 · v1 · pith:7W7NSQKKnew · submitted 2026-05-16 · 💻 cs.RO

SSTL: Self-Sensing Tendon Loop for Hysteresis Modeling and Compensation in Tendon-Sheath Mechanisms

Myeongbo Park , Junhyun Park , Ihsan Ullah , Chunggil An , Minho Hwang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 20:52 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.RO
keywords tendon-sheath mechanismhysteresis modelingself-sensing tendon loophysteresis compensationflexible endoscopic robotsfeedforward controltension measurement
0
0 comments X

The pith

A self-sensing tendon loop estimates hysteresis parameters from proximal tension data to compensate actuation errors in flexible robots.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Flexible endoscopic robots suffer from configuration-dependent hysteresis in tendon-sheath mechanisms that limits control accuracy. The proposed Self-Sensing Tendon Loop creates a double-pass structure that measures input and output tensions proximally. Because the loop shares the routing path with the actuation mechanism, their hysteresis behaviors correlate strongly. A learning-based mapping extracts the necessary parameters from the SSTL profile for use in a feedforward compensator. This approach cuts average RMSE by 88.1 percent across tested trajectories while achieving nearly the performance of methods requiring direct distal measurements.

Core claim

The paper establishes that the tension profile from the Self-Sensing Tendon Loop, measured entirely at the proximal end, supplies sufficient information for a learning model to identify the configuration-dependent hysteresis parameters of the actuation tendon-sheath mechanism, allowing a feedforward controller to compensate for the input-output discrepancy without any distal sensing hardware.

What carries the argument

The Self-Sensing Tendon Loop, which is a double-pass tendon structure wrapped around a distal pulley to enable proximal measurement of both input and output tensions for correlated hysteresis estimation.

Load-bearing premise

The SSTL and the actuation tendon-sheath mechanism must share identical routing paths so that their hysteresis characteristics remain sufficiently correlated for the mapping to transfer accurately.

What would settle it

Measuring the actual hysteresis parameters of the actuation TSM under a new tube configuration and comparing them directly to those predicted from the SSTL profile would test if the correlation holds and the compensation remains effective.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.16870 by Chunggil An, Ihsan Ullah, Junhyun Park, Minho Hwang, Myeongbo Park.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: System overview of the proposed SSTL integrated into a surgical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Mechanical design of the proposed SSTL. (a) Assembly of the SSTL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Schematic of a single tendon–sheath mechanism showing the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Hysteresis loop segmentation and parameter extraction for the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Bending-dependent parameter analysis of the SSTL and actuation TSM. (a) Inter-system correlation between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Tension tracking under varying bending configurations. (a) Sinusoidal reference. Shaded regions indicate the tracking error during the pull-propagation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Flexible endoscopic robots enable minimally invasive access through natural orifices, but their control accuracy is limited by configuration-dependent hysteresis in the tendon-sheath mechanisms (TSMs). Tendon-sheath friction and tendon elasticity induce a systematic discrepancy between the proximal actuation input and distal output, and this discrepancy varies with the insertion tube configuration. To address this challenge, this paper proposes the Self-Sensing Tendon Loop (SSTL), a double-pass tendon loop routed through the insertion tube and wrapped around a distal pulley, and returned to the proximal end. The loop structure allows both the input and output tensions of the SSTL to be measured proximally, thereby providing an input-output tension profile without requiring distal force or fiber-optic sensors. Because the SSTL shares the same routing path as the actuation TSM, the two TSMs exhibit strongly correlated hysteresis behaviors. From the SSTL tension profile, a learning-based mapping estimates the configuration-dependent hysteresis parameters of the actuation TSM, which are then used by a feedforward controller to compensate for actuation hysteresis. We validate the proposed method by tracking actuation tendon tension under three different insertion tube configurations. Across sinusoidal and random trajectories, the proposed method reduces average RMSE by 88.1% compared with the uncompensated baseline, achieving 97.8% of the performance of direct identification, which requires direct measurement of the input and output tension profile of the actuation TSM.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes the Self-Sensing Tendon Loop (SSTL), a double-pass tendon loop routed through the insertion tube and wrapped around a distal pulley, to enable proximal measurement of input-output tension profiles. Because the SSTL shares the routing path with the actuation tendon-sheath mechanism (TSM), the authors posit strongly correlated hysteresis behaviors; a learning-based mapping is then used to estimate configuration-dependent hysteresis parameters of the actuation TSM for feedforward compensation. Experiments across three insertion-tube configurations and both sinusoidal and random trajectories report an 88.1% average RMSE reduction versus the uncompensated baseline and 97.8% of the performance achieved by direct identification.

Significance. If the learned mapping transfers parameters reliably, the SSTL approach would allow effective hysteresis compensation in flexible endoscopic robots without distal force sensors or repeated direct identification, addressing a key limitation in minimally invasive robotic control. The reported performance levels suggest practical utility, provided the correlation assumption and experimental details are substantiated.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract and method description: the claim that the SSTL and actuation TSM 'exhibit strongly correlated hysteresis behaviors' because they share the same routing path is load-bearing for the entire compensation pipeline. The SSTL is a closed bidirectional double-pass loop with distal pulley friction and doubled effective length, while the actuation TSM is unidirectional; these mechanical differences can alter friction distribution and elastic stretch under identical tube curvatures. The manuscript provides no dedicated analysis, sensitivity study, or ablation quantifying how these differences affect the accuracy of the learned mapping, leaving open the possibility that the 97.8% relative performance is configuration-specific rather than generally reliable.
  2. Experimental validation section: the reported RMSE reductions and performance percentages rest on experimental data whose details are not supplied (training-data sources for the learning-based mapping, whether test trajectories were included in training, data-exclusion criteria, model architecture, or statistical error bars). Without these, it is impossible to verify that the central claim of accurate parameter transfer is supported rather than an artifact of the particular test set.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a brief enumeration of the three insertion-tube configurations and the precise form of the learning-based mapping (e.g., feature extraction from the tension profile and model type).
  2. Figure captions and results tables should report standard deviations or confidence intervals alongside mean RMSE values to allow assessment of trial-to-trial variability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive and detailed feedback on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make to strengthen the paper.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and method description: the claim that the SSTL and actuation TSM 'exhibit strongly correlated hysteresis behaviors' because they share the same routing path is load-bearing for the entire compensation pipeline. The SSTL is a closed bidirectional double-pass loop with distal pulley friction and doubled effective length, while the actuation TSM is unidirectional; these mechanical differences can alter friction distribution and elastic stretch under identical tube curvatures. The manuscript provides no dedicated analysis, sensitivity study, or ablation quantifying how these differences affect the accuracy of the learned mapping, leaving open the possibility that the 97.8% relative performance is configuration-specific rather than generally reliable.

    Authors: We acknowledge the mechanical distinctions noted: the SSTL forms a closed bidirectional loop with an additional distal pulley, while the actuation TSM operates unidirectionally. These differences can influence local friction and stretch distributions. However, because both share the identical insertion-tube routing path, the dominant configuration-dependent effects (tendon-sheath friction and elastic elongation) remain strongly coupled. The empirical results—88.1% average RMSE reduction and 97.8% of direct-identification performance across three tube configurations and both sinusoidal and random trajectories—provide direct evidence that the learned mapping transfers parameters reliably. To address the concern rigorously, we will add a dedicated subsection in the revised manuscript that analyzes these mechanical differences, explains why the correlation is preserved, and includes a sensitivity study on how SSTL tension variations affect mapping accuracy. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Experimental validation section: the reported RMSE reductions and performance percentages rest on experimental data whose details are not supplied (training-data sources for the learning-based mapping, whether test trajectories were included in training, data-exclusion criteria, model architecture, or statistical error bars). Without these, it is impossible to verify that the central claim of accurate parameter transfer is supported rather than an artifact of the particular test set.

    Authors: We agree that fuller disclosure of experimental procedures is required for reproducibility and to substantiate the claims. In the revised manuscript we will expand the experimental validation section to explicitly state: the sources and collection protocol for training data used by the learning-based mapping, confirmation that all test trajectories were excluded from training, any data-exclusion criteria applied, the precise model architecture (including layer sizes and training hyperparameters), and statistical error bars derived from repeated trials. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper's core contribution is a hardware SSTL setup that enables proximal measurement of tension profiles for a double-pass loop sharing the routing path with the actuation TSM, followed by a data-driven learning-based mapping to estimate hysteresis parameters and a feedforward compensator. Validation consists of experimental tracking under multiple tube configurations, with quantitative RMSE comparisons to an uncompensated baseline and to direct identification (which uses separate proximal/distal measurements on the actuation tendon itself). No equations, derivations, or self-citations are presented that reduce the claimed performance gain or the learned mapping to a tautological re-expression of the inputs; the correlation between SSTL and actuation behaviors is asserted from the shared path as an enabling assumption rather than derived by construction. The method therefore remains self-contained with independent empirical content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that hysteresis behaviors are strongly correlated when two tendons share the identical routing path; no free parameters or invented entities are explicitly introduced in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The SSTL and actuation TSM exhibit strongly correlated hysteresis behaviors because they share the same routing path.
    This correlation is invoked to justify transferring parameters from the SSTL tension profile to the actuation controller.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5804 in / 1388 out tokens · 45182 ms · 2026-05-19T20:52:23.863786+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Continuum robots for medical applications: A survey,

    J. Burgner-Kahrset al., “Continuum robots for medical applications: A survey,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1261– 1280, 2015

    work page 2015

  2. [2]

    K-flex: a flexible robotic platform for scar-free endoscopic surgery,

    M. Hwang and D.-S. Kwon, “K-flex: a flexible robotic platform for scar-free endoscopic surgery,”The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 16, no. 2, p. e2078, 2020

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (master) for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,

    S. J. Pheeet al., “Master and slave transluminal endoscopic robot (master) for natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery,” in2009 annual international conference of the IEEE engineering in medicine and biology society. IEEE, 2009, pp. 1192–1195

    work page 2009

  4. [4]

    A novel telemanipulated robotic assistant for surgical endoscopy: preclinical application to esd,

    L. Zornet al., “A novel telemanipulated robotic assistant for surgical endoscopy: preclinical application to esd,”IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 797–808, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Evalu- ation of a robotic arm-assisted endoscope to facilitate endoscopic sub- mucosal dissection (with video),

    M. Hwang, S. W. Lee, K. C. Park, H. J. Sul, and D.-S. Kwon, “Evalu- ation of a robotic arm-assisted endoscope to facilitate endoscopic sub- mucosal dissection (with video),”Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 699–706, 2020

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    Tendon-driven continuum robot for endoscopic surgery: Preclinical development and validation of a tension propagation model,

    T. Katoet al., “Tendon-driven continuum robot for endoscopic surgery: Preclinical development and validation of a tension propagation model,”IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 20, no. 5, pp. 2252–2263, 2014

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Fiora: A flexible tendon-driven continuum manipulator for laparoscopic surgery,

    F. Wanget al., “Fiora: A flexible tendon-driven continuum manipulator for laparoscopic surgery,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 1166–1173, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [8]

    Effect of backlash hysteresis of surgical tool bending joints on task performance in teleoperated flexible endoscopic robot

    H. Kimet al., “Effect of backlash hysteresis of surgical tool bending joints on task performance in teleoperated flexible endoscopic robot.” The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 16, p. e2047, 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    Model and control of tendon-sheath trans- mission systems,

    G. Palli and C. Melchiorri, “Model and control of tendon-sheath trans- mission systems,” inProceedings 2006 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 2006. ICRA 2006.IEEE, 2006, pp. 988–993

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    Transmission model and compensation control of double-tendon-sheath actuation system,

    Q. Wuet al., “Transmission model and compensation control of double-tendon-sheath actuation system,”IEEE Transactions on Indus- trial Electronics, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 1599–1609, 2014

    work page 2014

  11. [11]

    Control of force transmission for cable-driven actuation system based on modified friction model with compensation parame- ters,

    K. Tanet al., “Control of force transmission for cable-driven actuation system based on modified friction model with compensation parame- ters,”Control Engineering Practice, vol. 151, p. 106035, 2024

    work page 2024

  12. [12]

    An investigation of friction-based tendon sheath model appropriate for control purposes,

    T. Doet al., “An investigation of friction-based tendon sheath model appropriate for control purposes,”Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 42, no. 1-2, pp. 97–114, 2014

    work page 2014

  13. [13]

    Nonlinear friction modelling and compensation control of hysteresis phenomena for a pair of tendon-sheath actuated surgical robots,

    ——, “Nonlinear friction modelling and compensation control of hysteresis phenomena for a pair of tendon-sheath actuated surgical robots,”Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, vol. 60, pp. 770– 784, 2015

    work page 2015

  14. [14]

    A new model for control of systems with friction,

    C. C. De Witet al., “A new model for control of systems with friction,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 40, no. 3, pp. 419–425, 1995

    work page 1995

  15. [15]

    A new approach of friction model for tendon-sheath actuated surgical systems: Nonlinear modelling and parameter identi- fication,

    T. Doet al., “A new approach of friction model for tendon-sheath actuated surgical systems: Nonlinear modelling and parameter identi- fication,”Mechanism and Machine Theory, vol. 85, pp. 14–24, 2015

    work page 2015

  16. [16]

    Hysteresis modeling and compensation for tendon- sheath mechanisms in robot-assisted endoscopic surgery based on the modified bouc-wen model with decoupled model parameters,

    Z. Zhanget al., “Hysteresis modeling and compensation for tendon- sheath mechanisms in robot-assisted endoscopic surgery based on the modified bouc-wen model with decoupled model parameters,”IEEE Transactions on Medical Robotics and Bionics, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 218– 229, 2023

    work page 2023

  17. [17]

    Elongation modeling and compensation for the flexible tendon–sheath system,

    Z. Sunet al., “Elongation modeling and compensation for the flexible tendon–sheath system,”IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 1243–1250, 2013

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Hysteresis modeling and position control of tendon- sheath mechanism in flexible endoscopic systems,

    T. N. Doet al., “Hysteresis modeling and position control of tendon- sheath mechanism in flexible endoscopic systems,”Mechatronics, vol. 24, pp. 12–22, 2014

    work page 2014

  19. [19]

    Hysteresis compensation of flexible continuum manip- ulator using rgbd sensing and temporal convolutional network,

    J. Parket al., “Hysteresis compensation of flexible continuum manip- ulator using rgbd sensing and temporal convolutional network,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 9, no. 7, pp. 6091–6098, 2024

    work page 2024

  20. [20]

    Sam: Semi-active mechanism for extensible continuum ma- nipulator and real-time hysteresis compensation control algorithm,

    ——, “Sam: Semi-active mechanism for extensible continuum ma- nipulator and real-time hysteresis compensation control algorithm,” The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery, vol. 20, no. 6, p. e70014, 2024

    work page 2024

  21. [21]

    Efficiently calibrating cable-driven surgical robots with RGBD fiducial sensing and recurrent neural networks,

    M. Hwanget al., “Efficiently calibrating cable-driven surgical robots with RGBD fiducial sensing and recurrent neural networks,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 5, pp. 5937–5944, 2020

    work page 2020

  22. [22]

    Vibration-assisted hysteresis mitigation for achieving high compensation efficiency,

    M. Parket al., “Vibration-assisted hysteresis mitigation for achieving high compensation efficiency,” inIEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). IEEE, 2025

    work page 2025

  23. [23]

    Recurrent neural network with preisach model for configuration-specific hysteresis modeling of tendon-sheath mecha- nism,

    D. Kimet al., “Recurrent neural network with preisach model for configuration-specific hysteresis modeling of tendon-sheath mecha- nism,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 2763– 2770, 2022

    work page 2022

  24. [24]

    Active data-driven model and robust control scheme for twisted tendon-sheath hysteresis system using koopman operator,

    X. Wanget al., “Active data-driven model and robust control scheme for twisted tendon-sheath hysteresis system using koopman operator,” IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2024

    work page 2024

  25. [25]

    Markerless 6d pose estimation and position-based visual servoing for endoscopic continuum manipulators,

    J. Parket al., “Markerless 6d pose estimation and position-based visual servoing for endoscopic continuum manipulators,”arXiv preprint arXiv:2602.16365, 2026

    work page arXiv 2026

  26. [26]

    A three-axial force sensor based on fiber bragg grat- ings for surgical robots,

    W. Laiet al., “A three-axial force sensor based on fiber bragg grat- ings for surgical robots,”IEEE/ASME Transactions On Mechatronics, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 777–789, 2021

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    Dynamic hysteresis compensation for tendon-sheath mechanism in flexible surgical robots without distal perception,

    Q. Gaoet al., “Dynamic hysteresis compensation for tendon-sheath mechanism in flexible surgical robots without distal perception,”IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 2025

    work page 2025

  28. [28]

    A comprehensive control method for tendon–sheath system using friction model-based angle estimation and feedforward- feedback control in time-varying configurations,

    Y . Luet al., “A comprehensive control method for tendon–sheath system using friction model-based angle estimation and feedforward- feedback control in time-varying configurations,”IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 71, no. 5, pp. 5166–5175, 2023

    work page 2023

  29. [29]

    On-line shape estimation for hysteresis compensa- tion in tendon-sheath mechanisms using endoscopic camera,

    J. Honget al., “On-line shape estimation for hysteresis compensa- tion in tendon-sheath mechanisms using endoscopic camera,”IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 2025

    work page 2025

  30. [30]

    Control of a bowden-cable actuation system with embedded boasensor for soft wearable robots,

    U. Jeong and K.-J. Cho, “Control of a bowden-cable actuation system with embedded boasensor for soft wearable robots,”IEEE Transac- tions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 67, no. 9, pp. 7669–7680, 2019

    work page 2019

  31. [31]

    Multiparameter remote contact force sensor with embedded bend sensing for tendon-driven hand robots,

    S.-H. Kimet al., “Multiparameter remote contact force sensor with embedded bend sensing for tendon-driven hand robots,”IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 557–566, 2023

    work page 2023