pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17210 · v1 · pith:G5EJRZF5new · submitted 2026-05-17 · ⚛️ physics.ins-det

Scanning through space and time: past, present, and future of time-resolved scanning transmission soft X-ray microscopy

Simone Finizio , Tim A. Butcher , Sebastian Wintz , Markus Weigand , J\"org Raabe This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 23:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.ins-det
keywords time-resolved microscopyscanning transmission X-ray microscopypump-probe protocolmagneto-dynamicssynchrotron imagingnanoscale resolutionsoft X-rays
0
0 comments X

The pith

Time-resolved scanning transmission soft X-ray microscopy has tracked magnetic dynamics at the nanoscale since 2006.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper reviews how the pump-probe method in scanning transmission soft X-ray microscopy combines nanometric spatial resolution with sub-nanosecond timing to observe fast processes. It covers the technique's experimental setups and its extensive application to magneto-dynamical studies since its start in 2006. Recent examples are presented along with prospects tied to upgrades at synchrotron facilities that promise higher performance for future imaging.

Core claim

The authors describe time-resolved scanning transmission soft X-ray microscopy as a method introduced in 2006 that uses synchronized pump and probe pulses to image magnetic dynamics with high spatial and temporal precision, and they outline its implementations, applications, and potential enhancements from diffraction-limited light sources.

What carries the argument

The pump-probe protocol, in which an excitation pulse triggers the sample dynamics and a timed X-ray probe pulse records the state at chosen delays.

If this is right

  • Magnetic switching events and spin waves can be imaged directly at relevant length and time scales.
  • Device behavior in data storage and spintronics becomes observable under operating conditions.
  • Higher photon flux from new sources will shorten measurement times or raise image quality.
  • The approach supports extension to faster dynamics once source brightness increases.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same timing approach might apply to non-magnetic processes such as structural or chemical changes at the nanoscale.
  • Data from repeated pump-probe cycles could feed into models that reconstruct full time sequences from sparse samples.
  • Alignment precision between pump and probe beams may set a practical limit on achievable time resolution in real experiments.

Load-bearing premise

The review assumes that the described pump-probe implementations accurately represent current experimental capabilities and that synchrotron upgrades to diffraction-limited sources will directly enable the expected improvements in time-resolved imaging.

What would settle it

An experimental result showing that existing time-resolved scanning transmission soft X-ray microscopy setups cannot resolve magnetic processes below one nanosecond or that upgraded synchrotrons produce no gain in resolution or speed would disprove the claimed performance and outlook.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17210 by J\"org Raabe, Markus Weigand, Sebastian Wintz, Simone Finizio, Tim A. Butcher.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Sketch of the principle of pump-probe imaging. (a) A periodic signal is probed at different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Special case of pump-probe imaging at synchrotron lightsources where the dynamical [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Example of the time-resolved sampling of a sine wave with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. (a) Example of sampling a sine wave with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Calculated recorded counts for a flat signal using the SLS filling pattern (480 bunches, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Calculated amplitude of recorded time traces when considering different X-ray pulse [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Sketch of the concept of time-of-arrival detection protocol. (a) In the time-of-arrival proto [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Sketch of the operating principle of STXM imaging. A monochromatic X-ray beam is [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Simplified block diagram of the implementation of the single pump-multiple probe detection [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: FIG. 10. Simplified block diagram of the DEMUX implementation of the single pump-multiple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Simplified block diagram of the RAM address implementation of the single pump-multiple [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Shift of the center of the electron bunch with respect to its nominal position defined [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. Simplified block diagram of the implementation of the time-of-arrival protocol. This [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Principle of the time-of-arrival detection protocol, illustrating the necessity to perform [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p024_14.png] view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: FIG. 15. Snapshots of a 4D STXM-laminography image of the gyration dynamics of a magnetic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p027_15.png] view at source ↗
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: FIG. 16. Snapshots of a time-resolved 3D STXM-laminography image showing the propagation of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p028_16.png] view at source ↗
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: FIG. 17. Example of a power spectrum calculated according to Eq. (3) of a sample that was excited [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_17.png] view at source ↗
Figure 18
Figure 18. Figure 18: FIG. 18. Simulated effect of detector pileup on the signal to noise ratio for different optical densities [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_18.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Time-resolved microscopy with the pump-probe protocol is one of the most important techniques for the investigation of dynamical processes at the nanoscale, thanks to the possibility of combining nanometric resolution imaging with sub-nanosecond temporal resolutions. Amongst the ensemble of time-resolved microscopy techniques, time-resolved scanning transmission X-ray microscopy has been, since its inception in 2006, extensively utilized for the study of magneto-dynamical processes. In this review, an overview of the concept and experimental implementations of the pump-probe protocol in time-resolved scanning transmission X-ray microscopy imaging will be presented together with some examples of recent applications of the technique. Possible future developments aimed at meeting the new opportunities and challenges offered by the upgrade of synchrotrons to diffraction limited lightsources will also be discussed.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This review traces the development and applications of time-resolved scanning transmission soft X-ray microscopy (STXM) employing the pump-probe protocol. It states that the technique, introduced in 2006, has been extensively used for magneto-dynamical processes at the nanoscale, combining nanometric spatial resolution with sub-nanosecond temporal resolution. The manuscript outlines the underlying concept and experimental implementations, provides selected recent application examples, and discusses prospective advances enabled by upgrades of synchrotrons to diffraction-limited light sources.

Significance. If the cited experimental examples and historical summary are accurate, the review would provide a useful consolidation of the field for researchers working on nanoscale dynamics. It explicitly credits the established utilization of time-resolved STXM since 2006 and the body of published pump-probe work. The forward-looking section on diffraction-limited sources is framed as identifying opportunities rather than guaranteeing specific gains, which aligns with the review format and avoids overcommitment. The stress-test concern on technical barriers does not appear to undermine the central historical claim.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that 'some examples of recent applications' will be presented; specifying the approximate number or thematic range of these examples would help readers gauge the scope of the applications section.
  2. [Future developments] In the discussion of future developments, the text could clarify whether any quantitative estimates (e.g., expected improvements in temporal resolution) are drawn from cited references or remain qualitative projections.
  3. [Experimental implementations] Ensure that all cited implementations of the pump-probe protocol include the original publication years and key parameters (such as repetition rates or detector types) for easy cross-referencing by readers.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive assessment of the manuscript and for recommending minor revision. The report provides a concise summary of the review's scope and notes that the historical and application sections appear accurate, with the forward-looking discussion appropriately framed. No specific major comments were raised.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in this review paper

full rationale

This is a review article that summarizes the historical development, experimental implementations of the pump-probe protocol, selected application examples, and forward-looking discussion of synchrotron upgrades for time-resolved scanning transmission soft X-ray microscopy. No new derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions are introduced that could reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction. All claims rest on citations to prior published experimental work, with the future section framed as opportunities enabled by upgrades rather than guaranteed results derived from self-referential assumptions. The paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and contains no load-bearing self-citations or ansatzes that would trigger circularity under the defined criteria.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

As a review paper, this work does not introduce new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. It draws on the existing body of published research on time-resolved STXM and synchrotron capabilities.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5677 in / 1202 out tokens · 64003 ms · 2026-05-19T23:14:57.418974+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

102 extracted references · 102 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Wintz, V

    S. Wintz, V. Tiberkevich, M. Weigand, J. Raabe, J. Lindner, A. Erbe, A. Slavin, and J. Fass- bender, Magnetic vortex cores as tunable spin-wave emitters, Nature Nanotechnology11, 948 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Albisetti, S

    E. Albisetti, S. Tacchi, R. Silvani, G. Scaramuzzi, S. Finizio, S. Wintz, C. Rinaldi, M. Can- toni, J. Raabe, G. Carlotti, R. Bertacco, E. Riedo, and D. Petti, Optically inspired nano- magnonics with nonreciprocal spin waves in synthetic antiferromagnets, Advanced Materials 32, 1906439 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [3]

    Girardi, S

    D. Girardi, S. Finizio, C. Donnelly, G. Rubini, S. Mayr, V. Levati, S. Cuccurullo, F. Maspero, J. Raabe, D. Petti, and E. Albisetti, Three-dimensional spin wave dynamics, localization and interference in a synthetic antiferromagnet, Nature Communications15, 3057 (2024)

    work page 2024

  4. [4]

    Tr¨ ager, P

    N. Tr¨ ager, P. Gruszecki, F. Lisiecki, G. F, J. F¨ orster, M. Weigand, H. Glowinski, P. Kuswik, J. Dubowik, G. Sch¨ utz, M. Krawczyk, and J. Gr¨ afe, Real-space observation of magnon in- teraction with driven space-time crystals, Physical Review Letters126, 057201 (2021)

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    Baumgartner, K

    M. Baumgartner, K. Garello, J. Mendil, C. O. Avci, E. Grimaldi, C. Murer, J. Feng, M. Gabu- reac, C. Stamm, Y. Ackermann, S. Finizio, S. Wintz, J. Raabe, and P. Gambardella, Spatially 37 and time-resolved magnetization dynamics driven by spin-orbit torques, Nature Nanotech- nology12, 980 (2017)

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    Finizio, S

    S. Finizio, S. Wintz, K. Zeissler, A. V. Sadovnikov, S. Mayr, S. A. Nikitov, C. H. Marrows, and J. Raabe, High resolution dynamic imaging of the delay- and tilt-free motion of n´ eel domain walls in perpendicularly magnetized superlattices, Nano Letters19, 375 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Bisig, M

    A. Bisig, M. St¨ ark, M.-A. Mawass, C. Moutafis, J. Rhensius, J. Heidler, F. B¨ uttner, M. Noske, M. Weigand, S. Eisebitt, T. Tyliszczak, B. Van Waeyenberge, H. Stoll, G. Sch¨ utz, and M. Kl¨ aui, Correlation between spin structure oscillations and domain wall velocities, Nature Communications4, 2328 (2013)

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Rhensius, L

    J. Rhensius, L. Heyne, D. Backes, S. Krzyk, L. J. Heyderman, L. Joly, F. Nolting, and M. Kl¨ aui, Imaging of domain wall inertia in permalloy half-ring nanowires by time-resolved photoemission electron microscopy, Physical Review Letters104, 067201 (2010)

    work page 2010

  9. [9]

    Raabe, C

    J. Raabe, C. Quitmann, C. H. Back, F. Nolting, S. Johnson, and C. Buehler, Quantitative analysis of magnetic excitations in landau flux-closure structures using synchrotron-radiation microscopy, Physical Review Letters94, 217204 (2005)

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    Litzius, I

    K. Litzius, I. Lemesh, B. Kr¨ uger, P. Bassirian, L. Caretta, K. Richter, F. B¨ uttner, K. Sato, O. A. Tretiakov, J. F¨ orster, R. M. Reeve, M. Weigand, I. Bykova, H. Stoll, G. Sch¨ utz, G. S. D. Beach, and M. Kl¨ aui, Skyrmion hall effect revealed by direct time-resolved x-ray microscopy, Nature Physics13, 170 (2017)

    work page 2017

  11. [11]

    B¨ uttner, C

    F. B¨ uttner, C. Moutafis, M. Schneider, B. Kr¨ uger, C. M. G¨ unther, J. Geilhufe, C. von Korff Schmising, J. Mohanty, B. Pfau, S. Schaffert, A. Bisig, M. Foerster, T. Schulz, C. A. F. Vaz, J. H. Franken, H. J. M. Swagten, M. Kl¨ aui, and S. Eisebitt, Dynamics and inertia of skyrmionic spin structures, Nature Physics11, 225 (2015)

    work page 2015

  12. [12]

    Finizio, K

    S. Finizio, K. Zeissler, S. Wintz, S. Mayr, T. Weßels, A. J. Huxtable, G. Burnell, C. H. Marrows, and J. Raabe, Deterministic field-free skyrmion nucleation at a nano-engineered injector device, Nano Letters19, 7246 (2019)

    work page 2019

  13. [13]

    Nagaosa and Y

    N. Nagaosa and Y. Tokura, Topological properties and dynamics of magnetic skyrmions, Nature Nanotechnology8, 899 (2013)

    work page 2013

  14. [14]

    S. Woo, K. Litzius, B. Kr¨ uger, M.-Y. Im, L. Caretta, K. Richter, M. Mann, A. Krone, R. M. Reeve, M. Weigand, P. Agrawal, I. Lemesh, M.-A. Mawass, P. Fischer, M. Kl¨ aui, and G. S. D. Beach, Observation of room-temperature magnetic skyrmions and their current- 38 driven dynamics in ultrathin metallic ferromagnets, Nature Materials15, 501 (2016)

    work page 2016

  15. [15]

    Woo, K.-M

    S. Woo, K.-M. Song, X. Zhang, M. Ezawa, Y. Zhou, X. Liu, M. Weigand, S. Finizio, J. Raabe, M.-C. Park, K.-Y. Lee, J. W. Choi, B.-C. Min, H. C. Koo, and J. Chang, Deterministic creation and deletion of a single magnetic skyrmion observed by direct time-resolved x-ray microscopy, Nature Electronics1, 288 (2018)

    work page 2018

  16. [16]

    Zazvorka, F

    J. Zazvorka, F. Jakobs, D. Heinze, N. Keil, S. Kromin, S. Jaiswal, G. Jakob, P. Virnau, D. Pinna, K. Eveschor-Sitte, L. Rosza, a. Donges, U. Nowak, and M. Kl¨ aui, Thermal skyrmion diffusion used in a reshuffler device, Nature Nanotechnology14, 658 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [17]

    Klose, F

    C. Klose, F. B¨ uttner, W. Hu, C. Mazzoli, K. Litzius, R. Battistelli, S. Zayko, I. Lemesh, J. M. Bartell, M. Huang, C. M. G¨ unther, M. Schneider, A. Barbour, S. B. Wilkins, G. S. D. Beach, S. Eisebitt, and B. Pfau, Coherent correlation imaging for resolving fluctuating states of matter, Nature614, 256 (2023)

    work page 2023

  18. [18]

    B. L. Henke, E. M. Gullikson, and J. C. Davis, X-ray interactions: photoabsorption, scatter- ing, transmission, and reflection at e=50-30000 ev, z=1-92, Atomic Data and Nuclear Data Tables54, 181 (1993)

    work page 1993

  19. [19]

    Sch¨ utz, W

    G. Sch¨ utz, W. Wagner, W. Wilhelm, P. Kienle, R. Zeller, R. Frahm, and G. Materlik, Absorption of circularly polarized x-rays in iron, Physical Review Letters58, 737 (1987)

    work page 1987

  20. [20]

    Ade and B

    H. Ade and B. Hsiao, X-ray linear dichroism microscopy, Science1427, 262 (1993)

    work page 1993

  21. [21]

    St¨ ohr and M

    J. St¨ ohr and M. G. Samant, Liquid crystal alignment by rubbed polymer surfaces: a micro- scopic bond orientation model, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 98, 189 (1999)

    work page 1999

  22. [22]

    Sch¨ onhense, Imaging of magnetic structures by photoemission electron microscopy, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter11, 9517 (1999)

    G. Sch¨ onhense, Imaging of magnetic structures by photoemission electron microscopy, Jour- nal of Physics: Condensed Matter11, 9517 (1999)

    work page 1999

  23. [23]

    Fischer, G

    P. Fischer, G. Sch¨ utz, G. Schmal, P. Guttmann, and D. Raasch, Imaging of magnetic domains with the x-ray microscope at bessy using x-ray magnetic circular dichroism, Zeitschrift f¨ ur Physik B: Condensed Matter101, 313 (1996)

    work page 1996

  24. [24]

    J. B. Kortright, S.-K. Kim, H. Ohldag, G. Meighs, and A. Warwick, Magnetization imaging using scanning transmission x-ray microscopy, X-ray Microscopy Proceedings507, 49 (2000)

    work page 2000

  25. [25]

    D. V. Christensenet al., 2024 roadmap on magnetic microscopy techniques and their appli- cations in materials science, Journal of Physics: Materials7, 032501 (2024)

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Martin and H

    Y. Martin and H. K. Wickramasinghe, Magnetic imaging by force microscopy with a 1000 ˚ a 39 resolution, Applied Physics Letters1455, 50 (1987)

    work page 1987

  27. [27]

    M. R. Koblischka and U. Hartmann, Recent advances in magnetic force microscopy, Ultra- microscopy97, 103 (2003)

    work page 2003

  28. [28]

    Wiesendanger and M

    R. Wiesendanger and M. Bode, Nano- and atomic-scale magnetism studied by spin-polarized scanning tunneling microscopy and spectroscopy, Solid State Communications119, 341 (2001)

    work page 2001

  29. [29]

    M. E. Hale, H. W. Fuller, and H. Rubinstein, Magnetic domain observations by electron microscopy, Journal of Applied Physics30, 789 (1959)

    work page 1959

  30. [30]

    J. N. Chapman and M. R. Scheinfein, Transmission electron microscopies of magnetic nanos- tructures, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials200, 729 (1999)

    work page 1999

  31. [31]

    Weßels, S

    T. Weßels, S. D¨ aster, Y. Murooka, B. Zingsem, V. Migunov, M. Kruth, S. Finizio, P.-H. Lu, A. Kovacs, A. Oelsner, K. M¨ uller-Caspary, Y. Acremann, and R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, Continuous illumination picosecond imaging using a delay line detector in a transmission electron microscope, Ultramicroscopy233, 113392 (2022)

    work page 2022

  32. [32]

    McCord, Progress in magnetic domain observation by advanced magneto-optical mi- croscopy, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics48, 333001 (2015)

    J. McCord, Progress in magnetic domain observation by advanced magneto-optical mi- croscopy, Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics48, 333001 (2015)

    work page 2015

  33. [33]

    W. K. Hiebert, A. Stankiewicz, and M. R. Freeman, Direct observation of magnetic relaxation in a small permalloy disk by time-resolved scanning kerr microscopy, Physical Review Letters 79, 1134 (1997)

    work page 1997

  34. [34]

    M. R. Freeman and J. F. Smyth, Picosecond time-resolved magnetization dynamics of thin- film heads, Journal of Applied Physics79, 5898 (1996)

    work page 1996

  35. [35]

    Maletinsky, S

    P. Maletinsky, S. Hong, M. S. Grinolds, B. Hausmann, M. D. Lukin, R. L. Walsworth, M. Loncar, and A. Yacoby, A robust scanning diamond sensor for nanoscale imaging with single nitrogen-vacancy centres, Nature Nanotechnology7, 320 (2012)

    work page 2012

  36. [36]

    B. J. Maertz, A. P. Wijnheijmer, G. D. Fuchs, M. E. Nowakowski, and D. D. Awschalom, Vector magnetic field microscopy using nitrogen vacancy centers in diamond, Applied Physics Letters96, 092504 (2010)

    work page 2010

  37. [37]

    K. Herb, L. A. V¨ olker, J. M. Abendroth, N. Meinhardt, L. van Schie, P. Gambardella, and C. L. Degen, Quantum magnetometry of transient signals with a time resolution of 1.1 nanoseconds, Nature Communications16, 822 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [38]

    St¨ ohr, Y

    J. St¨ ohr, Y. Wu, B. D. Hermsmeier, M. G. Samant, G. R. Harp, S. Koranda, D. Dunham, 40 and B. P. Tonner, Element-specific magnetic microscopy with circularly polarized x-rays, Science259, 658 (1993)

    work page 1993

  39. [39]

    Buess, J

    M. Buess, J. Raabe, C. Quitmann, J. Stahl, and C. H. Back, Imaging excitations in magnetic thin film microstructures, Surface Science601, 5246 (2007)

    work page 2007

  40. [40]

    Le Guyader, A

    L. Le Guyader, A. Kleibert, A. Fraile Rodriguez, S. El Moussaoui, A. Balan, M. Buzzi, J. Raabe, and F. Nolting, Studying nanomagnets and magnetic heterostructures with x-ray peem at the swiss light source, Journal of Electron Spectroscopy and Related Phenomena 185, 371 (2012)

    work page 2012

  41. [41]

    Eisebitt, J

    S. Eisebitt, J. L¨ uning, W. F. Schlotter, M. L¨ orgen, O. Hellwig, W. Eberhardt, and J. St¨ ohr, Lensless imaging of magnetic nanostructures by x-ray spectro-holography, Nature432, 885 (2004)

    work page 2004

  42. [42]

    Battistelli, D

    R. Battistelli, D. Metternich, M. Schneider, L.-M. Kern, K. Litzius, J. Fuchs, C. Klose, K. Gerlinger, K. Bagschik, C. M. G¨ unther, D. Engel, C. Ropers, S. Eisebitt, B. Pfau, F. B¨ uttner, and S. Zayko, Coherent x-ray magnetic imaging with 5 nm resolution, Optica 11, 234 (2024)

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    von Korff Schmising, B

    C. von Korff Schmising, B. Pfau, M. Schneider, C. M. G¨ unther, M. Giovannella, J. Perron, B. Vobungbo, L. M¨ uller, F. Capotondi, E. Pedersoli, N. Mahne, J. L¨ uning, and S. Eisebitt, Imaging ultrafast demagnetization dynamics after a spatially localized optical excitation, Physical Review Letters112, 217203 (2014)

    work page 2014

  44. [44]

    Stoll, A

    H. Stoll, A. Puzic, B. van Waeyenberge, P. Fischer, J. Raabe, M. Buess, T. Haug, R. H¨ ollinger, C. Back, D. Weiss, and G. Denbeaux, High-resolution imaging of fast mag- netization dynamics in magnetic nanostructures, Applied Physics Letters84, 3328 (2004)

    work page 2004

  45. [45]

    C. V. Shank, R. L. Fork, R. F. Leheny, and J. Shah, Dynamics of photoexcited gaas band-edge absorption with subpicosecond resolution, Physical Review Letters42, 112 (1979)

    work page 1979

  46. [46]

    Donnelly, S

    C. Donnelly, S. Finizio, S. Gliga, M. Holler, A. Hrabec, M. Odstrcil, S. Mayr, V. Scagnoli, L. J. Heyderman, M. Guizar-Sicairos, and J. Raabe, Time-resolved imaging of three- dimensional nanoscale magnetization dynamics, Nature Nanotechnology15, 356 (2020)

    work page 2020

  47. [47]

    Finizio, S

    S. Finizio, S. Mayr, and J. Raabe, Time-of-arrival detection for time-resolved scanning trans- mission x-ray microscopy imaging, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation27, 1320 (2020)

    work page 2020

  48. [48]

    Finizio, B

    S. Finizio, B. Watts, and J. Raabe, Why is my image noisy? a look into the terms contribution to a time-resolved x-ray microscopy image, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation28, 1146 (2021). 41

    work page 2021

  49. [49]

    Goslawski, M

    P. Goslawski, M. Ries, M. Ruprecht, and G. W¨ ustefeld, The low-αlattice and bunch length limits at BESSY-VSR, Proceedings of the 5th International Particle Accelerator Conference 5, 216 (2014)

    work page 2014

  50. [50]

    Weigand, S

    M. Weigand, S. Wintz, J. Gr¨ afe, M. Noske, H. Stoll, B. Van Waeyenberge, and G. Sch¨ utz, Timemaxyne: A shot-noise limited, time-resolved pump-and-probe acquisition system capa- ble of 50 ghz frequencies for synchrotron-based x-ray microscopy, Crystals12, 1029 (2022)

    work page 2022

  51. [51]

    S. Mayr, J. F¨ orster, S. Finizio, K. Schultheiss, R. A. Gallardo, R. Narkovicz, G. Dieterle, A. Semisalova, J. Bailey, E. Kirk, A. Suszka, J. Lindner, J. Gr¨ afe, J. Raabe, G. Sch¨ utz, M. Weigand, H. Stoll, and S. Wintz, Time-resolved x-ray imaging of nanoscale spin-wave dynamics at multi-ghz frequencies using low-alpha synchrotron operation, Applied Ph...

    work page 2024

  52. [52]

    Finizio, J

    S. Finizio, J. B. Bailey, B. Olsthoorn, and J. Raabe, Periodogram-based detection of unknown frequencies in time-resolved scanning transmission x-ray microscopy, ACS Nano16, 21071 (2022)

    work page 2022

  53. [53]

    Finizio, S

    S. Finizio, S. Wintz, E. Kirk, and J. Raabe, In-situ membrane bending setup for strain- dependent scanning transmission x-ray microscopy investigations, Review of Scientific In- struments87, 123703 (2016)

    work page 2016

  54. [54]

    Witte, S

    K. Witte, S. Sp¨ ath, A nand Finizio, C. Donnelly, B. Watts, B. Sarafimov, M. Odstrcil, M. Guizar-Sicairos, M. Holler, R. H. Fink, and J. Raabe, From 2d stxm to 3d imaging: soft x-ray laminography of thin specimens, Nano Letters20, 1305 (2020)

    work page 2020

  55. [55]

    R¨ osner, S

    B. R¨ osner, S. Finizio, F. Koch, F. D¨ oring, V. A. Guzenko, M. Langer, E. Kirk, B. Watts, M. Meyer, J. Lorona Ornelas, A. Sp¨ ath, S. Stanescu, S. Swaraj, R. Belkhou, T. Ishikawa, T. F. Keller, B. Gross, M. Poggio, R. H. Fink, J. Raabe, A. Kleiber, and C. David, Soft x-ray microscopy with 7 nm resolution, Optica7, 1602 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    Pfeiffer, X-ray ptychography, Nature Photon.12, 9 (2018)

    F. Pfeiffer, X-ray ptychography, Nature Photon.12, 9 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [57]

    T. A. Butcher, S. Finizio, L. Heller, N. W. Phillips, B. Sarafimov, C. A. F. Vaz, A. Kleib- ert, B. Watts, M. Holler, and J. Raabe, Soft x-ray ptychography with sophie: Guide and instrumentation, Review of Scientific Instruments96, 123704 (2025)

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    T. A. Butcher, N. W. Phillips, C.-C. Chiu, C.-C. Wei, S.-Z. Ho, Y.-C. Chen, E. Fr¨ ojdh, F. Baruffaldi, M. Carulla, J. Zhang, A. Bergamaschi, C. A. F. Vaz, A. Kleibert, S. Finizio, J.-C. Yang, S.-W. Huang, and J. Raabe, Ptychographic nanoscale imaging of the magneto- 42 electric coupling in freestanding BiFeO 3, Adv. Mater.36, 2311157 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [59]

    D. A. Shapiroet al., An ultrahigh-resolution soft x-ray microscope for quantitative analysis of chemically heterogeneous nanomaterials, Science Advances6, eabc4904 (2020)

    work page 2020

  60. [60]

    A. P. Hitchcock, Soft x-ray spectromicroscopy and ptychography, Journal of Electron Spec- troscopy and Related Phenomena200, 49 (2015)

    work page 2015

  61. [61]

    Acremann, V

    Y. Acremann, V. Chembrolu, J. P. Strachan, T. Tyliszczak, and J. St¨ ohr, Software defined photon counting system for time resolved x-ray experiments, Review of Scientific Instruments 78, 014702 (2007)

    work page 2007

  62. [62]

    van Waeyenberge, A

    B. van Waeyenberge, A. Puzic, H. Stoll, K. W. Chou, T. Tyliszczak, R. Hertel, R. F¨ ahnle, H. Br¨ uckl, K. Rott, G. Reiss, I. Neudecker, D. Weiss, C. H. Back, and G. Sch¨ utz, Magnetic vortex core reversal by excitation with short bursts of an alternating field, Nature444, 461 (2006)

    work page 2006

  63. [63]

    Acremann, J

    Y. Acremann, J. P. Strachan, V. Chembrolu, S. D. Andrews, T. Tyliszczak, J. A. Ka- tine, M. J. Carey, B. M. Clemens, H. C. Siegmann, and J. St¨ ohr, Time-resolved imaging of spin transfer switching: beyond the macrospin concept, Physical Review Letters96, 217202 (2006)

    work page 2006

  64. [64]

    Kammerer, M

    M. Kammerer, M. Weigand, M. Curcic, M. Noske, M. Sproll, A. Vansteenkiste, B. van Waeyenberge, H. Stoll, G. Woltersdorf, C. H. Back, and G. Sch¨ utz, Magnetic vortex core reversal by excitation of spin waves, Nature Communications279, 2 (2011)

    work page 2011

  65. [65]

    Dieterle, J

    G. Dieterle, J. F¨ orster, H. Stoll, A. S. Semisalova, S. Finizio, A. Gangwar, M. Weigand, M. Noske, M. F¨ ahnle, I. Bykova, J. Gr¨ afe, D. A. Bozhko, H. Y. Musiienko-Shmarova, V. Tiberkevich, A. Slavin, C. H. Back, J. Raabe, G. Sch¨ utz, and S. Wintz, Coherent ex- citation of heterosymmetric spin waves with ultrashort wavelengths, Physical Review Letters...

    work page 2019

  66. [66]

    S. Mayr, L. Flajsman, S. Finizio, A. Hrabec, M. Weigand, J. F¨ orster, H. Stoll, L. J. Hey- derman, M. Urbanek, S. Wintz, and J. Raabe, Spin-wave emission from vortex cores under static magnetic bias fields, Nano Letters21, 1584 (2021)

    work page 2021

  67. [67]

    Puzic, T

    A. Puzic, T. Korhonen, B. Kalantari, J. Raabe, C. Quitmann, P. J¨ ullig, L. Bommer, D. Goll, G. Sch¨ utz, S. Wintz, T. Strache, M. K¨ orner, D. Marko, C. Bunce, and J. Fassbender, Photon counting system for time-resolved experiments in multibunch mode, Synchrotron Radiation News23, 26 (2010). 43

    work page 2010

  68. [68]

    Finizio, S

    S. Finizio, S. Wintz, E. Kirk, A. K. Suszka, S. Gliga, P. Wohlh¨ uter, K. Zeissler, and J. Raabe, Control of the gyration dynamics of magnetic vortices by the magnetoelastic effect, Physical Review B96, 054438 (2017)

    work page 2017

  69. [69]

    R. A. Bosch and C. S. Hsue, Suppression of longitudinal coupled-bunch instabilities by a pas- sive higher harmonic cavity, Proceedings of International Conference on Particle Accelerators (1993)

    work page 1993

  70. [70]

    Weigandet al., in preparation (2026)

    M. Weigandet al., in preparation (2026)

    work page 2026

  71. [71]

    D. A. Gedcke and W. J. Mc Donald, A constant fraction of pulse height trigger for optimum time resolution, Nuclear Instrumentation Methods55, 377 (1967)

    work page 1967

  72. [72]

    A. Q. R. Baron, S. Kishimoto, J. Morse, and J.-M. Rigal, Silicon avalanche photodiodes for direct detection of x-rays, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation13, 131 (2005)

    work page 2005

  73. [73]

    Liet al., in preparation (2026)

    S. Liet al., in preparation (2026)

    work page 2026

  74. [74]

    Fernandez-Pacheco, R

    A. Fernandez-Pacheco, R. Streubel, O. Fruchart, R. Herter, P. Fischer, and R. P. Cowburn, Three-dimensional magnetism, Nature Communications8, 15756 (2017)

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    T. A. Butcher, N. W. Phillips, A. L. Levitan, M. Weigand, S. Wintz, J. Raabe, and S. Finizio, Nanoscale domain-wall dynamics in micromagnetic structures with weak per- pendicular anisotropy, Physical Review B111, L220409 (2025)

    work page 2025

  76. [76]

    Donnelly, M

    C. Donnelly, M. Guizar-Sicairos, V. Scagnoli, S. Gliga, M. Holler, J. Raabe, and L. J. Hey- derman, Three-dimensional magnetization structures revealed with x-ray vector nanotomog- raphy, Nature547, 328 (2017)

    work page 2017

  77. [77]

    Holler, M

    M. Holler, M. Odstrcil, M. Guizar-Sicairos, M. Lebugle, E. M¨ uller, S. Finizio, G. Tinti, C. David, J. Zusman, W. Unglaub, O. Bunk, J. Raabe, A. F. J. Levi, and G. Aeppli, Three- dimensional imaging of integrated circuits with macro- to nanoscale zoom, Nature Electronics 2, 464 (2019)

    work page 2019

  78. [78]

    Finizio, C

    S. Finizio, C. Donnelly, S. Mayr, A. Hrabec, and J. Raabe, Three-dimensional vortex gyration dynamics unraveled by time-resolved soft x-ray laminography with freely selectable excitation frequencies, Nano Letters22, 1971 (2022)

    work page 1971

  79. [79]

    Hubert and R

    A. Hubert and R. Sch¨ afer,Magnetic domains: the analysis of magnetic microstructures (Springer Verlag, 1998)

    work page 1998

  80. [80]

    J. R. Eshbach and R. W. Damon, Surface magnetostatic modes and surface spin waves, Physical Review118, 1208 (1960). 44

    work page 1960

Showing first 80 references.