pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17321 · v1 · pith:E4X5Q2HZnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

Role of Magnetic Field in the Redistribution of Turbulence from Large-Scale Structures to Small-Scale Fluctuations

Tanmay Karmakar , Rosh Roy , Lavkesh Lachhvani , Raju Daniel , Bhoomi Khodiyar , Prabal K. Chattopadhyay , Abhijit Sen , Sayak Bose This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:55 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords drift-wave turbulencezonal flowsmagnetic fieldReynolds stressplasma fluctuationsspectral redistributionlinear plasma devicevelocity correlations
0
0 comments X

The pith

Increasing the magnetic field from 600 to 1000 G suppresses zonal flows while shifting turbulence power from low to high frequencies through reduced Reynolds stress.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper investigates how stronger magnetic fields alter drift-wave turbulence in a linear plasma device. When the field rises from 600 to 1000 G, zonal flows weaken and mean flows strengthen. Fluctuation power redistributes from the 0.1-1 kHz range to the 1-300 kHz range, with steeper spectra and higher high-to-low frequency power ratios. This shift connects to weaker Reynolds stress caused by lost correlation between radial and poloidal velocity fluctuations. The change appears across the plasma and points to a move toward smaller-scale dominance possibly aided by mean flow shear.

Core claim

As the magnetic field is increased from 600 to 1000 G, zonal flow is suppressed while the mean flow increases. Spectral analysis of density and potential fluctuations shows a redistribution of power from low-frequency (0.1-1 kHz) to high-frequency (1-300 kHz) components, along with an increase in the spectral slope and the ratio PHF/PLF. This change is linked to a reduction in Reynolds stress due to the loss of correlation between radial and poloidal velocity fluctuations, which possibly weakens the drive for zonal flow generation. Similar behavior is observed near the peak gradient region, also indicating its global nature. The present results suggest a transition from a zonal-flowdominated

What carries the argument

Reduction of Reynolds stress from loss of correlation between radial and poloidal velocity fluctuations, which weakens the drive for zonal flow generation as magnetic field strength rises.

If this is right

  • Zonal flow generation weakens as magnetic field strength increases due to decorrelated velocity fluctuations.
  • Turbulence power shifts toward smaller scales and higher frequencies with steeper spectral slopes.
  • Mean flow increases and may contribute to dominating over zonal flows.
  • The redistribution occurs globally, including near the peak density gradient region.
  • The plasma moves from a zonal-flow-regulated state to one controlled more by small-scale fluctuations.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same magnetic field dependence could be checked in toroidal devices to see if the zonal-to-small-scale transition affects overall confinement.
  • Independent control of mean flow shear in future runs could test whether it alone reproduces the observed power redistribution.
  • Measuring transport levels at the two field strengths would show whether the shift to high-frequency fluctuations changes particle or heat loss rates.
  • The ratio of high-frequency to low-frequency power might serve as a diagnostic for the strength of zonal flow regulation in other plasma setups.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that loss of correlation between radial and poloidal velocity fluctuations directly causes the observed reduction in Reynolds stress and zonal flow suppression when magnetic field increases, rather than other unmeasured factors.

What would settle it

An observation that zonal flows remain strong and Reynolds stress stays high even after radial-poloidal velocity correlation is lost at 1000 G, or that suppression occurs without any change in that correlation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17321 by Abhijit Sen, Bhoomi Khodiyar, Lavkesh Lachhvani, Prabal K. Chattopadhyay, Raju Daniel, Rosh Roy, Sayak Bose, Tanmay Karmakar.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Schematic of the IMPED experimental setup (scale in cm). The six dashed vertical red lines at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic of the probe arrangement for experimental measurements. The probe tips are inserted through different radial [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Parametric evolution of plasma profiles with increasing magnetic field [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Auto-power spectrum of the floating potential fluctuation ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Poloidal wavenumber (kθ ) spectra of the potential fluctuations φ˜ f at r = 1.6 cm for different magnetic field Bm. ularly near the gradient region. This enhanced shear can influence turbulence dynamics by modifying eddy structures and contributing to the decorrelation of fluc￾tuations [11]. The steepening of gradients can be un￾derstood as a consequence of reduced cross-field trans￾port at higher magnetic… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Auto-power spectra of (a-e) density fluctuations ( ˜n [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (a) Spectral index (α) and power ratio (PHF/PLF) for density ( ˜n) and floating potential (φ˜ f ) as a function of mag￾netic field Bm, measured at r = 1.6 cm (location of maxi￾mum Reynolds stress gradient). (b) Corresponding variation of decorrelation time (τc) with Bm. leads to a weakening of the Reynolds stress drive. To investigate how this reduction in drive affects the fluctu￾ations, we analyze the au… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Radial fluctuation spectra for different magnetic fields. Panels (a)–(c) show the density fluctuation spectra, while panels [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Variation of (a) cross-power spectrum, (b) squared [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_9.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Magnetized plasmas with equilibrium density gradients support drift-wave turbulence, which is often regulated by self-generated zonal flows. In this work, we experimentally examine the effect of increasing the magnetic field on turbulence characteristics in a linear plasma device. As the magnetic field is increased from 600 to 1000 G, zonal flow is suppressed while the mean flow increases. Spectral analysis of density and potential fluctuations shows a redistribution of power from low-frequency (0.1-1 kHz) to high-frequency (1-300 kHz) components, along with an increase in the spectral slope and the ratio PHF/PLF. This change is linked to a reduction in Reynolds stress due to the loss of correlation between radial and poloidal velocity fluctuations, which possibly weakens the drive for zonal flow generation. Similar behavior is observed near the peak gradient region, also indicating its global nature. The present results suggest a transition from a zonal-flow-dominated regime to a state dominated by smaller-scale fluctuations, possibly influenced by mean flow shear. These findings highlight how the magnetic field redistributes spectral energy across frequency scales in drift-wave turbulent plasmas

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript experimentally studies the impact of raising the magnetic field from 600 G to 1000 G in a linear plasma device. It reports suppression of zonal flows accompanied by an increase in mean flow, together with a spectral redistribution of density and potential fluctuations from the low-frequency band (0.1–1 kHz) to the high-frequency band (1–300 kHz), an increase in spectral slope, and a rise in the PHF/PLF ratio. These changes are linked to a reduction in Reynolds stress caused by loss of correlation between radial and poloidal velocity fluctuations, which is argued to weaken the drive for zonal-flow generation; similar trends are noted near the peak gradient region.

Significance. If the reported correlation loss is shown to be the dominant driver, the work supplies direct experimental evidence that magnetic-field strength can shift drift-wave turbulence from a zonal-flow-regulated regime to one dominated by smaller-scale fluctuations. The measurements of velocity correlations and spectral power redistribution constitute a concrete data set that can be used to test Reynolds-stress closure models in linear devices.

major comments (1)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that loss of radial–poloidal velocity correlation reduces Reynolds stress and thereby suppresses zonal flow is stated only as 'possibly' and is not supported by a direct Reynolds-stress budget or a controlled test that isolates the correlation change from the simultaneous rise in mean-flow shear. Without such a closure, the observed spectral redistribution can be explained by mean-flow shear alone.
minor comments (2)
  1. No error bars, statistical significance tests, or details on probe positioning and data exclusion criteria are provided for the reported trends in spectra or correlations.
  2. [Abstract] The phrase 'possibly influenced by mean flow shear' in the final sentence of the abstract should be expanded into a quantitative estimate or at least a consistency check with the measured mean-flow profiles.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful and constructive review of our manuscript. The single major comment raises a valid concern about the strength of evidence presented for the central claim in the abstract. We address this point directly below and have revised the manuscript accordingly.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract: the central claim that loss of radial–poloidal velocity correlation reduces Reynolds stress and thereby suppresses zonal flow is stated only as 'possibly' and is not supported by a direct Reynolds-stress budget or a controlled test that isolates the correlation change from the simultaneous rise in mean-flow shear. Without such a closure, the observed spectral redistribution can be explained by mean-flow shear alone.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract's use of 'possibly' is overly cautious and that a full Reynolds-stress budget is not provided. The manuscript calculates the relevant Reynolds stress component directly from the measured radial and poloidal velocity fluctuations and shows its reduction with increasing magnetic field due to the observed loss of correlation. We will revise the abstract to state the link more directly, supported by these measurements. To address isolation from mean-flow shear, we will add a new paragraph in the discussion section comparing the radial locations and time scales of the observed changes: the spectral redistribution and PHF/PLF increase track the decorrelation more closely than the mean-flow shear profile, which remains relatively constant in the core region where the effect is strongest. While a controlled test isolating the two effects would require additional experiments, the existing data set already allows this comparative analysis. These revisions will be incorporated in the next version. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: experimental observations are self-contained

full rationale

The manuscript is an experimental report on plasma turbulence measurements in a linear device as B is scanned from 600 to 1000 G. All central claims (zonal-flow suppression, spectral power redistribution from low to high frequencies, loss of radial-poloidal velocity correlation, and possible Reynolds-stress reduction) are presented as direct inferences from measured time series, spectra, and cross-correlations. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are invoked to derive these quantities from one another; the causal language remains qualified ('possibly weakens', 'suggest a transition'). The work therefore contains no load-bearing step that reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard drift-wave turbulence theory and experimental measurements without introducing new free parameters, axioms beyond domain assumptions, or invented entities.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Drift-wave turbulence in magnetized plasmas with equilibrium density gradients is regulated by self-generated zonal flows
    Invoked in the opening sentence of the abstract as the background framework for interpreting the observed changes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5764 in / 1318 out tokens · 25683 ms · 2026-05-19T22:55:33.846150+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Drift waves and transport,

    W. Horton, “Drift waves and transport,”Reviews of Mod- ern Physics, vol. 71, no. 3, p. 735, 1999

    work page 1999

  2. [2]

    Drift waves in a high-density cylindrical helicon discharge,

    C. Schröder, O. Grulke, T. Klinger, and V . Naulin, “Drift waves in a high-density cylindrical helicon discharge,” Physics of plasmas, vol. 12, no. 4, 2005

    work page 2005

  3. [3]

    Collisional drift instability in a variable radial electric field,

    E. M. Marshall, R. Ellis, and J. Walsh, “Collisional drift instability in a variable radial electric field,”Plasma physics and controlled fusion, vol. 28, no. 9B, pp. 1461– 1482, 1986

    work page 1986

  4. [4]

    On the transition to drift turbulence in a magnetized plasma column,

    M. Burin, G. Tynan, G. Antar, N. Crocker, and C. Hol- land, “On the transition to drift turbulence in a magnetized plasma column,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 12, no. 5, 2005

    work page 2005

  5. [5]

    Observation of turbulent- driven shear flow in a cylindrical laboratory plasma de- vice,

    G. Tynan, C. Holland, J. Yu, A. James, D. Nishijima, M. Shimada, and N. Taheri, “Observation of turbulent- driven shear flow in a cylindrical laboratory plasma de- vice,”Plasma physics and controlled fusion, vol. 48, no. 4, p. S51, 2006

    work page 2006

  6. [6]

    Ki- netic simulations of magnetized turbulence in astrophys- ical plasmas,

    G. Howes, W. Dorland, S. Cowley, G. Hammett, E. Quataert, A. Schekochihin, and T. Tatsuno, “Ki- netic simulations of magnetized turbulence in astrophys- ical plasmas,”Physical Review Letters, vol. 100, no. 6, p. 065004, 2008

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Recent progress in astrophysical plasma turbu- lence from solar wind observations,

    C. Chen, “Recent progress in astrophysical plasma turbu- lence from solar wind observations,”Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 82, no. 6, p. 535820602, 2016

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Progress in anomalous transport research in toroidal magnetic confinement devices,

    B. A. Carreras, “Progress in anomalous transport research in toroidal magnetic confinement devices,”IEEE Trans- actions on plasma science, vol. 25, no. 6, pp. 1281–1321, 2002

    work page 2002

  9. [9]

    Zonal flows in plasma-a review,

    P. H. Diamond, S. Itoh, K. Itoh, and T. Hahm, “Zonal flows in plasma-a review,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. R35–R161, 2005

    work page 2005

  10. [10]

    Physics of zonal flows,

    K. Itoh, S.-I. Itoh, P. Diamond, T. Hahm, A. Fujisawa, G. Tynan, M. Yagi, and Y . Nagashima, “Physics of zonal flows,”Physics of plasmas, vol. 13, no. 5, 2006. 12

    work page 2006

  11. [11]

    Suppression of turbulence and transport by sheared flow,

    P. Terry, “Suppression of turbulence and transport by sheared flow,”Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 72, no. 1, p. 109, 2000

    work page 2000

  12. [12]

    A review of zonal flow experiments,

    A. Fujisawa, “A review of zonal flow experiments,”Nu- clear Fusion, vol. 49, no. 1, p. 013001, 2008

    work page 2008

  13. [13]

    Identification of zonal flows in a toroidal plasma,

    A. Fujisawa, K. Itoh, H. Iguchi, K. Matsuoka, S. Oka- mura, A. Shimizu, T. Minami, Y . Yoshimura, K. Nagaoka, C. Takahashi,et al., “Identification of zonal flows in a toroidal plasma,”Physical review letters, vol. 93, no. 16, p. 165002, 2004

    work page 2004

  14. [14]

    Influence of sheared poloidal rotation on edge turbulence,

    H. Biglari, P. Diamond, and P. Terry, “Influence of sheared poloidal rotation on edge turbulence,”Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–4, 1990

    work page 1990

  15. [15]

    Modifications of turbulence and turbulent transport associated with a bias-induced con- finement transition in the large plasma device,

    T. Carter and J. Maggs, “Modifications of turbulence and turbulent transport associated with a bias-induced con- finement transition in the large plasma device,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 16, no. 1, 2009

    work page 2009

  16. [16]

    Self-regulation of turbulence bursts and trans- port barriers,

    E. Floriani, G. Ciraolo, P. Ghendrih, R. Lima, and Y . Sarazin, “Self-regulation of turbulence bursts and trans- port barriers,”Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, vol. 55, no. 9, p. 095012, 2013

    work page 2013

  17. [17]

    Inverse mirror plasma experimental device (imped)-a magnetized linear plasma device for wave studies,

    S. Bose, P. Chattopadhyay, J. Ghosh, S. Sengupta, Y . Sax- ena, and R. Pal, “Inverse mirror plasma experimental device (imped)-a magnetized linear plasma device for wave studies,”Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 81, no. 2, p. 345810203, 2015

    work page 2015

  18. [18]

    An experimental study of the ex- istence regions and non-linear interactions of drift wave and kelvin–helmholtz instabilities in a linear magnetized plasma,

    R. Roy, T. Karmakar, L. Lachhvani, P. Chattopadhyay, A. Sen, and S. Bose, “An experimental study of the ex- istence regions and non-linear interactions of drift wave and kelvin–helmholtz instabilities in a linear magnetized plasma,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 32, no. 2, 2025

    work page 2025

  19. [19]

    An experimental study of the rayleigh taylor and kelvin helmholtz instabilities, and their nonlinear interactions in a linear magnetized plasma column,

    R. Roy, T. Karmakar, L. Lachhvani, B. Khodiyar, P. Chat- topadhyay, and A. Sen, “An experimental study of the rayleigh taylor and kelvin helmholtz instabilities, and their nonlinear interactions in a linear magnetized plasma column,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 32, p. 122116, 12 2025

    work page 2025

  20. [20]

    Zonal flow dynamics, modulation of mean-flow-driven fluctuations, and particle flux control in a linear magnetized plasma.,

    T. Karmakar, R. Roy, L. Lachhvani, R. Daniel, B. Khodi- yar, P. Chattopadhyay, and A. Sen, “Zonal flow dynamics, modulation of mean-flow-driven fluctuations, and particle flux control in a linear magnetized plasma.,”Nuclear Fu- sion, 2026

    work page 2026

  21. [21]

    Inverse mirror plasma experimen- tal device-a new magnetized linear plasma device with wide operating range,

    S. Bose, M. Kaur, P. K. Chattopadhyay, J. Ghosh, and Y . C. Saxena, “Inverse mirror plasma experimen- tal device-a new magnetized linear plasma device with wide operating range,”Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 86, no. 6, p. 063501, 2015

    work page 2015

  22. [22]

    Automated plasma probing system for laboratory exper- iments in high vacuum using closed loop control,

    R. Roy, R. Sugandhi, M. Kumar, and P. K. Chattopadhyay, “Automated plasma probing system for laboratory exper- iments in high vacuum using closed loop control,”Fusion Engineering and Design, vol. 193, p. 113849, 2023

    work page 2023

  23. [23]

    Si- multaneous positioning and operation of multiple probe drives for inverse mirror experimental plasma device,

    J. Patel, R. Roy, K. Doshi, T. Karmakar, I. Mansuri, M. Bhandarkar, K. Mahajan, and P. Chattopadhyay, “Si- multaneous positioning and operation of multiple probe drives for inverse mirror experimental plasma device,”Re- view of Scientific Instruments, vol. 96, no. 3, 2025

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Impact of the electron density and temperature gradient on drift-wave turbulence in the large plasma device,

    C. Perks, S. Mordijck, T. Carter, B. Van Compernolle, S. Vincena, G. Rossi, and D. Schaffner, “Impact of the electron density and temperature gradient on drift-wave turbulence in the large plasma device,”Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 88, no. 4, p. 905880405, 2022

    work page 2022

  25. [25]

    Dynamics of particle flux in a cylin- drical magnetized plasma,

    S. Oldenbürger, S. Inagaki, T. Kobayashi, H. Arakawa, N. Ohyama, K. Kawashima, Y . Tobimatsu, A. Fujisawa, K. Itoh, and S. Itoh, “Dynamics of particle flux in a cylin- drical magnetized plasma,”Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion, vol. 54, no. 5, p. 055002, 2012

    work page 2012

  26. [26]

    Fast-fourier- transform spectral-analysis techniques as a plasma fluctu- ation diagnostic tool,

    D. Smith, E. Powers, and G. Caldwell, “Fast-fourier- transform spectral-analysis techniques as a plasma fluctu- ation diagnostic tool,”IEEE Transactions on Plasma Sci- ence, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 261–272, 2007

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Causal relationship between zonal flow and turbulence in a toroidal plasma,

    A. Fujisawa, A. Shimizu, H. Nakano, S. Ohshima, K. Itoh, Y . Nagashima, S.-I. Itoh, H. Iguchi, Y . Yoshimura, T. Mi- nami,et al., “Causal relationship between zonal flow and turbulence in a toroidal plasma,”Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 76, no. 3, p. 033501, 2007

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Experimental studies of zonal flow and field in compact helical system plasma,

    A. Fujisawa, K. Itoh, A. Shimizu, H. Nakano, S. Ohshima, H. Iguchi, K. Matsuoka, S. Okamura, T. Minami, Y . Yoshimura,et al., “Experimental studies of zonal flow and field in compact helical system plasma,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 15, no. 5, 2008

    work page 2008

  29. [29]

    Digital bispectral analysis and its applications to nonlinear wave interactions,

    Y . C. Kim and E. J. Powers, “Digital bispectral analysis and its applications to nonlinear wave interactions,”IEEE transactions on plasma science, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 120– 131, 2007

    work page 2007

  30. [30]

    Understanding langmuir probe current- voltage characteristics,

    R. L. Merlino, “Understanding langmuir probe current- voltage characteristics,”American Journal of Physics, vol. 75, no. 12, pp. 1078–1085, 2007

    work page 2007

  31. [31]

    Langmuir probe in collisionless and colli- sional plasma including dusty plasma,

    S. Bose, M. Kaur, P. Chattopadhyay, J. Ghosh, Y . Saxena, and R. Pal, “Langmuir probe in collisionless and colli- sional plasma including dusty plasma,”Journal of Plasma Physics, vol. 83, no. 2, p. 615830201, 2017

    work page 2017

  32. [32]

    Si- multaneous measurements of turbulent reynolds stresses and particle flux in both parallel and perpendicular direc- tions in a linear magnetized plasma device,

    S. Chakraborty Thakur, R. Hong, and G. R. Tynan, “Si- multaneous measurements of turbulent reynolds stresses and particle flux in both parallel and perpendicular direc- tions in a linear magnetized plasma device,”Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 89, no. 10, 2018

    work page 2018

  33. [33]

    Zonal flows in plasma—a review,

    P. H. Diamond, S.-I. Itoh, K. Itoh, and T. S. Hahm, “Zonal flows in plasma—a review,”Plasma Physics and Con- trolled Fusion, vol. 47, no. 5, pp. R35–R161, 2005

    work page 2005

  34. [34]

    Control of zonal flows via profile modification and collisional damp- ing in linear magnetized plasma column,

    T. Karmakar, R. Roy, L. Lachhvani, R. Daniel, B. Khodi- yar, P. K. Chattopadhyay, A. Sen, and S. Bose, “Control of zonal flows via profile modification and collisional damp- ing in linear magnetized plasma column,”Physics of Plas- mas, vol. 33, no. 5, 2026

    work page 2026

  35. [35]

    Coexistence of zonal flows and drift-waves in a cylindrical magnetized plasma,

    Y . Nagashima, S.-I. Itoh, S. Shinohara, M. Fukao, A. Fu- jisawa, K. Terasaka, Y . Kawai, N. Kasuya, G. R. Tynan, P. H. Diamond,et al., “Coexistence of zonal flows and drift-waves in a cylindrical magnetized plasma,”Jour- nal of the Physical Society of Japan, vol. 77, no. 11, p. 114501, 2008

    work page 2008

  36. [36]

    Suppression of drift wave turbulence and zonal flow formation by changing axial boundary conditions in a cylindrical magnetized plasma device,

    S. Chakraborty Thakur, M. Xu, P. Manz, N. Fedorczak, C. Holland, and G. R. Tynan, “Suppression of drift wave turbulence and zonal flow formation by changing axial boundary conditions in a cylindrical magnetized plasma device,”Physics of Plasmas, vol. 20, no. 1, 2013

    work page 2013