pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17460 · v1 · pith:LO2LDZGCnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · 🌌 astro-ph.HE

GRMHD Simulations of Magnetized Accretion Disk/Jet: Variabilities of Black Holes and Spectral Energy Distributions in Magnetic States

Rohan Raha , Banibrata Mukhopadhyay , Koushik Chatterjee This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:33 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.HE
keywords GRMHD simulationsblack hole accretion disksmagnetically arrested disksjet formationspectral energy distributionsX-ray variabilityblack hole statesBlandford-Znajek mechanism
0
0 comments X

The pith

The magnetic flux threading the black hole horizon controls jet efficiency, magnetization, and radiative output in three accretion states.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper runs three-dimensional general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of a rapidly spinning black hole with different initial magnetic field setups. It identifies magnetically arrested disk, intermediate, and standard and normal evolution states and shows that the horizon magnetic flux acts as the main control knob for jet power and radiation. The work links simulation results to observations by producing spectral energy distributions and X-ray light curves that match patterns in sources such as GRS 1915+105 and Cyg X-1. A clear hierarchy emerges with MAD states brightest and most variable due to flux eruptions, while INT and SANE states show less extreme behavior from reconnection and turbulence.

Core claim

The magnetic flux threading the black hole horizon emerges as the fundamental state variable controlling jet efficiency, flow magnetization, and radiative output across MAD, INT, and SANE accretion states. Simulations with varying initial magnetic geometries demonstrate that MAD states exhibit the highest luminosity and fractional variability through quasi-periodic flux eruptions, INT states show moderate variability from episodic reconnection, and SANE states are driven by stochastic MRI turbulence.

What carries the argument

The magnetic flux threading the black hole horizon, which determines the transition between and properties of MAD, INT, and SANE states.

If this is right

  • MAD states yield the highest time-averaged luminosity and X-ray emission with quasi-periodic variability.
  • INT and SANE states produce moderate variability from reconnection and MRI turbulence respectively.
  • All twelve temporal classes of GRS 1915+105 can be mapped to the three magnetic states.
  • Cyg X-1's hard state matches a sustained INT configuration.
  • HLX-1's high luminosities result from efficient Blandford-Znajek jet extraction in MAD states at higher black hole masses.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Changes in observed jet power could be used to infer variations in horizon magnetic flux in real time.
  • Including radiative cooling in future simulations might alter the predicted SED hierarchies.
  • The state classification may extend to active galactic nuclei with different black hole masses and accretion rates.

Load-bearing premise

That the chosen initial magnetic field geometries and direct scaling of simulated luminosities to observed sources capture the dominant physics without missing effects like radiative cooling or non-ideal MHD.

What would settle it

A direct measurement or inference of horizon magnetic flux in a source like GRS 1915+105 during state transitions that fails to correlate with the predicted changes in jet efficiency and variability amplitude.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17460 by Banibrata Mukhopadhyay, Koushik Chatterjee, Rohan Raha.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Temporal evolution of key diagnostics for 3D simulations. Top Left: Mass accretion rate (in code units) showing different variability patterns. Top Right: Normalized magnetic flux ϕBH with MAD saturation threshold (dotted line at ϕ ≈ 50). Bottom: Jet efficiency η. MAD (P2B100, blue) exhibits quasi-periodic flux eruptions with ⟨ϕBH⟩ ≈ 50 and ηjet ∼ 1.0–1.5. INT (PLB100, orange) shows moderate flux ⟨ϕBH⟩ ∼ 2… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Time-averaged velocity structure with colors showing velocity magnitude. Top Left: MAD exhibits highly collimated jets (opening angle∼ 60◦ ) with terminal velocities vjet ∼ 0.95c (Γmax ∼ 3.2). Top Right: INT shows partially collimated outflows (opening angle ∼ 50◦ ) with vjet ∼ 0.5c (Γmax ∼ 2.7). Bottom: SANE displays turbulent, weakly collimated outflows (opening angle∼ 40◦ ) with vjet ∼ 0.1c (Γmax ∼ 2.6)… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Time-averaged magnetization σm = b 2/ρ with the colors showing magnetization values. Top Left: MAD shows strong magnetic domination (σm ∼ 5–100) in wide polar jets. Top Right: INT exhibits moderate magnetization (σm ∼ 0.5) with narrower outflow regions. Bottom: SANE maintains weak magnetization (σm ∼ 0.1) throughout. White dotted contours mark σm = 1 (jet-disk boundary); orange dashed lines show disk scale… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: displays the spatial distribution of energy transport. It reveals fundamental differences in energy extraction mechanisms across magnetic states. In the MAD configura￾tion ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Density-weighted radial profiles of proton temperature Tp (solid lines) and electron temperature Te (dashed lines) for MAD (blue), INT (orange), and SANE (green) states, scaled to GRS 1915+105 (M = 14 M⊙, m˙ = 0.01). The state-dependent proton-to-electron temperature ratios R = Tp/Te of 150 (MAD), 200 (INT), and 150 (SANE) are chosen such that the electron temperature profiles closely match across all thre… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Broadband spectral energy distributions for three black hole systems spanning 10–104 M⊙. Top: GRS 1915+105 (M = 14 M⊙, m˙ = 0.01). Middle: Cyg X-1 (M = 20 M⊙, m˙ = 0.002). Bottom: HLX-1 (M = 2 × 104 M⊙, m˙ = 0.003). Solid lines show total emission (synchrotron + inverse￾Compton), dotted lines show the synchrotron component, and dashed lines show the inverse￾Compton component. Colors indicate magnetic state… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Band-integrated X-ray luminosity νLν in the 10–100 keV band as a function of simulation time for MAD (black), INT (blue), and SANE (red) states, scaled to GRS 1915+105 (M = 14 M⊙, m˙ = 0.01). Solid lines show the arithmetic mean over frequency bins within the band; shaded regions indicate the minimum-to-maximum spread across those bins at each timestep. Downward arrows mark the four flux eruption events id… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: X-ray (10–100 keV) versus radio/jet power correlation. Colored regions show simulation predictions for MAD (blue), INT (orange), and SANE (green) states scaled to GRS 1915+105, Cyg X￾1, and HLX-1. Individual state fits yield LX ∝ L 1.10 R (MAD), LX ∝ L 1.09 R (INT), and LX ∝ L 1.11 R (SANE). The observational aggregate (red line) shows LX ∝ L 0.85 R , consistent with a mixture of states. Observation points… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We perform three-dimensional general relativistic magnetohydrodynamic (GRMHD) simulations of a near-maximally spinning black hole (spin parameter, a = 0.998) with varying initial magnetic field geometries, systematically exploring the parameter space connecting magnetically arrested disk (MAD), intermediate (INT), and standard and normal evolution (SANE) accretion states. The magnetic flux threading the black hole horizon emerges as the fundamental state variable controlling jet efficiency, flow magnetization, and radiative output across all three states. We introduce complementary diagnostics-broadband spectral energy distributions spanning radio through hard X-ray frequencies and time-resolved X-ray light curves-that together connect simulation dynamics directly to multiwavelength observables. The radiative output follows a clear MAD > INT > SANE hierarchy in time-averaged luminosity, mean X-ray emission, as well as variability. Furthermore, MAD exhibits the highest fractional variability through quasi-periodic magnetic flux eruption events, and INT and SANE show moderate variability driven by episodic reconnection and stochastic MRI turbulence, respectively. Scaling to GRS 1915+105, Cyg X-1, and HLX-1, we demonstrate that all twelve temporal classes of GRS 1915+105 map naturally onto our three magnetic states, Cyg X-1's persistent hard state is reproduced by a sustained INT configuration, and HLX-1's extreme luminosities arise through efficient Blandford-Znajek extraction in MAD states scaled to higher black hole mass.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports three-dimensional GRMHD simulations of a near-maximally spinning black hole (a = 0.998) with varying initial magnetic field geometries that realize MAD, INT, and SANE accretion states. The central claim is that the magnetic flux threading the black hole horizon is the fundamental state variable controlling jet efficiency, flow magnetization, and radiative output. The authors introduce broadband SEDs (radio to hard X-ray) and time-resolved X-ray light curves as diagnostics, reporting a clear MAD > INT > SANE hierarchy in time-averaged luminosity, mean X-ray emission, and variability, with MAD states showing quasi-periodic flux eruptions. They map the three states onto the twelve temporal classes of GRS 1915+105, the persistent hard state of Cyg X-1, and the extreme luminosities of HLX-1.

Significance. If the results hold, the work supplies a unified picture in which a single parameter—the horizon magnetic flux—organizes jet power, magnetization, and multi-wavelength variability across accretion states. The systematic exploration of initial field geometries and the direct connection of simulation outputs to observables via post-processed SEDs and light curves are constructive features. The study could help interpret the diversity of X-ray binary and ULX phenomenology within a common GRMHD framework.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods / simulation setup] The simulations are performed in ideal GRMHD with no radiative cooling term in the energy equation. Because the central claims concern radiative output, SEDs, and variability hierarchies (including quasi-periodic eruptions in MAD states), the lack of cooling means that internal energy accumulates and the temperature/density profiles fed into the post-processing are not regulated by the same thermodynamics that would operate in real disks. This assumption is load-bearing for the reported MAD > INT > SANE ordering and for the direct scaling to GRS 1915+105, Cyg X-1, and HLX-1.
  2. [Results / observational scaling] The scaling of simulated luminosities and variability amplitudes to observed sources assumes that the ideal-MHD, no-cooling results translate directly. It is unclear whether the claimed flux-controlled hierarchy in radiative efficiency and magnetization would survive once radiative losses are included self-consistently, which could alter both the accretion flow structure and the Blandford-Znajek extraction efficiency presented as flux-controlled.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract states that all twelve temporal classes of GRS 1915+105 map onto the three magnetic states; an explicit mapping or table in the main text would make this claim easier to evaluate.
  2. [Methods] Clarify the precise criteria used to classify a run as MAD, INT, or SANE (e.g., horizon flux thresholds or saturation levels) and how the chosen initial field geometries achieve these states.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the potential of our work to provide a unified framework linking magnetic flux to accretion states and observables. We address each major comment below with clarifications on our methodology and planned revisions to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods / simulation setup] The simulations are performed in ideal GRMHD with no radiative cooling term in the energy equation. Because the central claims concern radiative output, SEDs, and variability hierarchies (including quasi-periodic eruptions in MAD states), the lack of cooling means that internal energy accumulates and the temperature/density profiles fed into the post-processing are not regulated by the same thermodynamics that would operate in real disks. This assumption is load-bearing for the reported MAD > INT > SANE ordering and for the direct scaling to GRS 1915+105, Cyg X-1, and HLX-1.

    Authors: We agree that performing the simulations without an explicit radiative cooling term represents a significant approximation. Our ideal GRMHD runs allow internal energy to accumulate, which affects the thermodynamic profiles used in post-processing for SEDs and light curves. The reported MAD > INT > SANE hierarchy in luminosity and variability is primarily driven by differences in magnetic flux saturation, jet efficiency, and flow magnetization, which are set by ideal MHD dynamics. Nevertheless, we acknowledge that self-consistent cooling could alter disk structure and temperatures. We will revise the manuscript by adding a new subsection in the Discussion that explicitly discusses this limitation, references relevant radiative GRMHD studies, and qualifies the robustness of the ordering under the no-cooling assumption. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results / observational scaling] The scaling of simulated luminosities and variability amplitudes to observed sources assumes that the ideal-MHD, no-cooling results translate directly. It is unclear whether the claimed flux-controlled hierarchy in radiative efficiency and magnetization would survive once radiative losses are included self-consistently, which could alter both the accretion flow structure and the Blandford-Znajek extraction efficiency presented as flux-controlled.

    Authors: The observational scalings are performed by normalizing simulated jet powers and variability amplitudes to match observed source properties (e.g., temporal classes in GRS 1915+105), using black hole mass and accretion rate as scaling parameters. We maintain that the central role of horizon magnetic flux in controlling Blandford-Znajek jet efficiency is robust because it follows from the electromagnetic extraction mechanism itself, which operates independently of radiative losses in the disk. However, we concede that cooling could modify the accretion flow geometry and thus indirectly influence flux accumulation. We will revise the text in the Results and Discussion sections to include explicit caveats on the assumptions underlying the direct scaling and to note that future radiative simulations are needed to test the persistence of the hierarchy. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Forward GRMHD simulations with chosen initial conditions; no derivation reduces to fitted inputs or self-citation

full rationale

The paper runs three-dimensional GRMHD simulations of a near-maximally spinning black hole with varying initial magnetic field geometries to explore the MAD-INT-SANE parameter space. The central claim that horizon magnetic flux controls jet efficiency, magnetization, and radiative output is presented as an emergent result from these runs rather than being presupposed by definition or by a fitted parameter. Broadband SEDs and light curves are introduced as post-processed diagnostics connecting dynamics to observables, and scaling to GRS 1915+105, Cyg X-1, and HLX-1 is an interpretive mapping of temporal classes onto the simulated states. No load-bearing step in the provided text reduces by the paper's own equations to a self-citation chain, an ansatz smuggled via prior work, or a prediction that is statistically forced by construction. The derivation chain consists of numerical experiments whose outputs are independent of the target observables.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Paper rests on standard GRMHD equations and the assumption that initial magnetic geometries can be tuned to produce distinct MAD/INT/SANE regimes; no new entities postulated.

free parameters (2)
  • initial magnetic field geometry and strength
    Varied to reach MAD, INT, and SANE states; specific values chosen by hand to achieve target flux levels.
  • black hole spin a = 0.998
    Fixed near-maximal value; not derived from data.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Ideal GRMHD equations in Kerr spacetime
    Invoked as the governing equations for the simulations.
  • domain assumption Blandford-Znajek mechanism for jet power
    Used to interpret efficient energy extraction in MAD states.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5811 in / 1389 out tokens · 32758 ms · 2026-05-19T22:33:53.239605+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 60 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Broadband reflection spectroscopy of MAXI J1535-571 using AstroSat: Estimation of black hole mass and spin

    Remillard, R.A.; McClintock, J.E. X-Ray Properties of Black-Hole Binaries.Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys.2006,44, 49–92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.44.051905.092532 2006

  2. [2]

    A model-independent analysis of the variability of GRS 1915+105.Astron

    Belloni, T.; Klein-Wolt, M.; Méndez, M.; van der Klis, M.; van Paradijs, J. A model-independent analysis of the variability of GRS 1915+105.Astron. Astrophys.2000,355, 271

    work page 1915

  3. [3]

    Accretion disk winds as the jet suppression mechanism in the microquasar GRS 1915+105.ApJ2011,731, 33

    Neilsen, J.; Lee, J.C. Accretion disk winds as the jet suppression mechanism in the microquasar GRS 1915+105.ApJ2011,731, 33

    work page 1915

  4. [4]

    HEARTBEATS

    Altamirano, D.; Belloni, T.; Linares, M.; van der Klis, M.; Wijnands, R.; Curran, P .A.; Kalamkar, M.; Stiele, H.; Motta, S.; Muñoz- Darias, T.; et al. THE FAINT “HEARTBEATS” OF IGRJ17091–3624: AN EXCEPTIONAL BLACK HOLE CANDIDATE.Astrophys. J. Lett.2011,742, L17. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/L17

    work page doi:10.1088/2041-8205/742/2/l17 2011

  5. [5]

    Spectral analysis of GRS 1915+105.MNRAS2018, 476, 1581

    Adegoke, O.; Dhang, P .; Mukhopadhyay, B.; Ramadevi, M.C.; Bhattacharya, D. Spectral analysis of GRS 1915+105.MNRAS2018, 476, 1581

    work page 1915

  6. [6]

    Science , author =

    Miller-Jones, J.C.A.; Bahramian, A.; Orosz, J.A.; Mandel, I.; Gou, L.; Maccarone, T.J.; Neijssel, C.J.; Zhao, X.; Ziółkowski, J.; Reid, M.J.; et al. Cygnus X-1 contains a 21-solar mass black hole—Implications for massive star winds.Science2021,371, 1046–1049. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb3363. Universe2026,1, 0 28 of 30

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abb3363

  7. [7]

    A relativistic jet from Cygnus X-1.MNRAS 2001,327, 1273

    Stirling, A.M.; Spencer, R.E.; de la Force, C.J.; Garrett, M.A.; Fender, R.P .; Ogley, R.N. A relativistic jet from Cygnus X-1.MNRAS 2001,327, 1273

    work page 2001

  8. [8]

    An IXPE-Led Campaign on the Soft State of Cygnus X-1.AAS/High Energy Astrophys

    Steiner, J.; Nathan, E.; IXPE Collaboration. An IXPE-Led Campaign on the Soft State of Cygnus X-1.AAS/High Energy Astrophys. Div.2024,21, 107.65

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    The Cool Accretion Disk in ESO 243-49 HLX-1: Further Evidence of an Intermediate-mass Black Hole.Astrophys

    Davis, S.W.; Narayan, R.; Zhu, Y.; Barret, D.; Farrell, S.A.; Godet, O.; Servillat, M.; Webb, N.A. The Cool Accretion Disk in ESO 243-49 HLX-1: Further Evidence of an Intermediate-mass Black Hole.Astrophys. J.2011,734, 111. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004 -637X/734/2/111

    work page doi:10.1088/0004 2011

  10. [10]

    X-Ray Spectral State Evolution in the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source ESO 243-49 HLX-1.ApJ2011,743, 6

    Servillat, M.; Farrell, S.A.; Lin, D.; Godet, O.; Barret, D.; Webb, N.A. X-Ray Spectral State Evolution in the Ultraluminous X-Ray Source ESO 243-49 HLX-1.ApJ2011,743, 6

    work page

  11. [11]

    Magnetic Floods: A Scenario for the Variability of the Microquasar GRS 1915+105

    Tagger, M.; Varniere, P .; Rodriguez, J.; Pellat, R. Magnetic Floods: A Scenario for the Variability of the Microquasar GRS 1915+105. Astrophys. J.2004,607, 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1086/383232

    work page doi:10.1086/383232 1915

  12. [12]

    Magnetically Arrested Disk in Cygnus X-1.P ASJ2003,55, L69

    Narayan, R.; Igumenshchev, I.V .; Abramowicz, M.A. Magnetically Arrested Disk in Cygnus X-1.P ASJ2003,55, L69

    work page

  13. [13]

    Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows.Astrophys

    Igumenshchev, I.V .; Narayan, R.; Abramowicz, M.A. Three-dimensional Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations of Radiatively Inefficient Accretion Flows.Astrophys. J.2003,592, 1042–1059. https://doi.org/10.1086/375769

    work page doi:10.1086/375769 2003

  14. [14]

    Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole.MNRAS2011,418, L79

    Tchekhovskoy, A.; Narayan, R.; McKinney, J.C. Efficient generation of jets from magnetically arrested accretion on a rapidly spinning black hole.MNRAS2011,418, L79

    work page

  15. [15]

    Flux Eruption Events Drive Angular Momentum Transport in Magnetically Arrested Accretion Flows

    Chatterjee, K.; Narayan, R. Flux Eruption Events Drive Angular Momentum Transport in Magnetically Arrested Accretion Flows. ApJ2022,941, 30. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac9d97

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac9d97

  16. [16]

    A powerful local shear instability in weakly magnetized disks.ApJ1991,376, 214

    Balbus, S.A.; Hawley, J.F. A powerful local shear instability in weakly magnetized disks.ApJ1991,376, 214

    work page

  17. [17]

    Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.Mon

    Blandford, R.D.; Znajek, R.L. Electromagnetic extraction of energy from Kerr black holes.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.1977, 179, 433–456. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/179.3.433

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/179.3.433 1977

  18. [18]

    On the Universality of Energy Extraction from Black Hole Spacetimes

    Chatterjee, K.; Younsi, Z.; Kocherlakota, P .; Narayan, R. On the Universality of Energy Extraction from Black Hole Spacetimes. ApJL2025,991, L58. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ae0740

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ae0740 2041

  19. [19]

    GRMHD simulations of black hole accretion variabilities: implications to hard state X-ray binary transients.MNRAS2026,546, stag148

    Raha, R.; Mukhopadhyay, B.; Chatterjee, K. GRMHD simulations of black hole accretion variabilities: implications to hard state X-ray binary transients.MNRAS2026,546, stag148. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stag148

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stag148

  20. [20]

    The Spin of the Near-Extreme Kerr Black Hole GRS 1915+105.Astrophys

    McClintock, J.E.; Shafee, R.; Narayan, R.; Remillard, R.A.; Davis, S.W.; Li, L.X. The Spin of the Near-Extreme Kerr Black Hole GRS 1915+105.Astrophys. J.2006,652, 518–539. https://doi.org/10.1086/508457

    work page doi:10.1086/508457 1915

  21. [21]

    A Parallax Distance to the Microquasar GRS 1915+105 and a Revised Estimate of its Black Hole Mass.ApJ2014,796, 2

    Reid, M.J.; McClintock, J.E.; Steiner, J.F.; Steeghs, D.; Remillard, R.A.; Dhawan, V .; Narayan, R. A Parallax Distance to the Microquasar GRS 1915+105 and a Revised Estimate of its Black Hole Mass.ApJ2014,796, 2

    work page 1915

  22. [22]

    A Rapidly Changing Jet Orientation in the Stellar-mass Black Hole V404 Cygni.ApJ2020, 904, 30

    Miller-Jones, J.C.; Tetarenko, A.J.; Sivakoff, G.R.; Middleton, M.J.; Altamirano, D.; Anderson, G.E.; Belloni, T.M.; Fender, R.P .; Jonker, P .G.; Körding, E.G.; et al. A Rapidly Changing Jet Orientation in the Stellar-mass Black Hole V404 Cygni.ApJ2020, 904, 30

    work page

  23. [23]

    The iron Kα Compton shoulder in transmitted and reflected spectra , volume =

    Klein-Wolt, M.; Fender, R.P .; Pooley, G.G.; Belloni, T.; Migliari, S.; Morgan, E.H.; van der Klis, M. Hard X-ray states and radio emission in GRS 1915+105.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2002,331, 745–764. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05223.x

    work page doi:10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05223.x 1915

  24. [24]

    Accretion disc winds in the black hole system GRS 1915+105: New insights from Chan- dra/HETGS observations.MNRAS2012,421, 502–511

    Neilsen, J.; Petschek, A.J.; Lee, J.C. Accretion disc winds in the black hole system GRS 1915+105: New insights from Chan- dra/HETGS observations.MNRAS2012,421, 502–511

    work page 1915

  25. [25]

    Advection-dominated Accretion: A Self-similar Solution.ApJL1994,428, L13

    Narayan, R.; Yi, I. Advection-dominated Accretion: A Self-similar Solution.ApJL1994,428, L13

    work page

  26. [26]

    Evidence for local mass accretion rate variations in the disc of GRS 1915+105.Astron

    Migliari, S.; Belloni, T. Evidence for local mass accretion rate variations in the disc of GRS 1915+105.Astron. Astrophys.2003, 404, 283–289. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20030484

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030484 1915

  27. [27]

    Discovery of a 34 Hz quasi-periodic oscillation in the X-ray emission of GRS 1915+105.MNRAS 2013,432, 19–22

    Belloni, T.M.; Altamirano, D. Discovery of a 34 Hz quasi-periodic oscillation in the X-ray emission of GRS 1915+105.MNRAS 2013,432, 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt285

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stt285 1915

  28. [28]

    The Accretion Disk Wind in the Black Hole GRS 1915+105.Astrophys

    Miller, J.M.; Raymond, J.; Fabian, A.C.; Gallo, E.; Kaastra, J.; Kallman, T.; King, A.L.; Proga, D.; Reynolds, C.S.; Zoghbi, A. The Accretion Disk Wind in the Black Hole GRS 1915+105.Astrophys. J. Lett.2016,821, L9. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8205/821/ 1/L9

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8205/821/ 1915

  29. [29]

    Towards a unified model for black hole X-ray binary jets.MNRAS2004,355, 1105

    Fender, R.P .; Belloni, T.M.; Gallo, E. Towards a unified model for black hole X-ray binary jets.MNRAS2004,355, 1105

    work page

  30. [30]

    Steady jets from radiatively efficient hard states in GRS1915+105.Astron

    Rushton, A.; Spencer, R.; Fender, R.; Pooley, G. Steady jets from radiatively efficient hard states in GRS1915+105.Astron. Astrophys. 2010,524, A29. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201014929

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201014929 2010

  31. [31]

    The physics of disk winds, jets, and X-ray variability in GRS 1915+105.Proc

    Neilsen, J.; Lee, J.C.; Remillard, R. The physics of disk winds, jets, and X-ray variability in GRS 1915+105.Proc. Int. Astron. Union 2010,6, 290–293. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1743921310016182

    work page doi:10.1017/s1743921310016182 1915

  32. [32]

    Microquasars in our Galaxy.Nature1998,392, 673–676

    Mirabel, I.F.; Rodríguez, L.F. Microquasars in our Galaxy.Nature1998,392, 673–676. https://doi.org/10.1038/33603

    work page doi:10.1038/33603

  33. [33]

    2 Years of INTEGRAL Monitoring of GRS 1915+105

    Rodriguez, J.; Shaw, S.E.; Hannikainen, D.C.; Belloni, T.; Corbel, S.; Cadolle Bel, M.; Chenevez, J.; Prat, L.; Kretschmar, P .; Lehto, H.J.; et al. 2 Years of INTEGRAL Monitoring of GRS 1915+105. I. Multiwavelength Coverage with INTEGRAL, RXTE, and the Ryle Radio Telescope.ApJ2008,675, 1436–1448. Universe2026,1, 0 29 of 30

    work page 1915

  34. [34]

    H-AMR: A New GPU-accelerated GRMHD Code for exascale computing with 3D adaptive mesh refinement and local adaptive time stepping.ApJS2022,263, 26

    Liska, M.T.P .; Chatterjee, K.; Issa, D.; Yoon, D.; Kaaz, N.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Van Eijnatten, D.; Musoke, G.; Hesp, C.; Rohoza, V .; et al. H-AMR: A New GPU-accelerated GRMHD Code for exascale computing with 3D adaptive mesh refinement and local adaptive time stepping.ApJS2022,263, 26

    work page

  35. [35]

    The extreme spin of the black hole in cygnus X-1.Astrophys

    Gou, L.; McClintock, J.E.; Reid, M.J.; Orosz, J.A.; Steiner, J.F.; Narayan, R.; Xiang, J.; Remillard, R.A.; Arnaud, K.A.; Davis, S.W. The extreme spin of the black hole in cygnus X-1.Astrophys. J.2011,742, 85. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/85

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/85 2011

  36. [36]

    , keywords =

    Fabian, A.C.; Wilkins, D.R.; Miller, J.M.; Reis, R.C.; Reynolds, C.S.; Cackett, E.M.; Nowak, M.A.; Pooley, G.G.; Pottschmidt, K.; Sanders, J.S.; et al. On the determination of the spin of the black hole in Cyg X-1 from X-ray reflection spectra.MNRAS2012, 424, 217–223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21185.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21185.x 2012

  37. [37]

    Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes.Astrophys

    Fishbone, L.G.; Moncrief, V . Relativistic fluid disks in orbit around Kerr black holes.Astrophys. J.1976,207, 962–976. https://doi.org/10.1086/154565

    work page doi:10.1086/154565 1976

  38. [38]

    General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetically choked accretion flows around black holes.Mon

    McKinney, J.C.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Blandford, R.D. General relativistic magnetohydrodynamic simulations of magnetically choked accretion flows around black holes.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2012,423, 3083–3117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966. 2012.21074.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966 2012

  39. [39]

    Assessing quantitative results in accretion simulations: From local to global.Astrophys

    Hawley, J.F.; Guan, X.; Krolik, J.H. Assessing quantitative results in accretion simulations: From local to global.Astrophys. J.2011, 738, 84. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/738/1/84

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/738/1/84 2011

  40. [40]

    Accelerating AGN jets to parsec scales using general relativistic MHD simulations.MNRAS2019,490, 2200–2218

    Chatterjee, K.; Liska, M.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Markoff, S.B. Accelerating AGN jets to parsec scales using general relativistic MHD simulations.MNRAS2019,490, 2200–2218. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2626

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stz2626

  41. [41]

    Angular Momentum Transport by Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in Accretion Disks: Gas Pressure Dependence of the Saturation Level of the Magnetorotational Instability.Astrophys

    Sano, T.; Inutsuka, S.I.; Turner, N.J.; Stone, J.M. Angular Momentum Transport by Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence in Accretion Disks: Gas Pressure Dependence of the Saturation Level of the Magnetorotational Instability.Astrophys. J.2004,605, 321. https://doi.org/10.1086/382184

    work page doi:10.1086/382184 2004

  42. [42]

    The Event Horizon General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Code Comparison Project.ApJS2019,243, 26

    Porth, O.; Chatterjee, K.; Narayan, R.; Gammie, C.F.; Mizuno, Y.; Anninos, P .; Baker, J.G.; Bugli, M.; Chan, C.K.; Davelaar, J.; et al. The Event Horizon General Relativistic Magnetohydrodynamic Code Comparison Project.ApJS2019,243, 26. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab29fd

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab29fd

  43. [43]

    Electron thermodynamics in GRMHD simulations of low-luminosity black hole accretion.Mon

    Ressler, S.M.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Quataert, E.; Chandra, M.; Gammie, C.F. Electron thermodynamics in GRMHD simulations of low-luminosity black hole accretion.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2015,454, 1848–1870. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv2084

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stv2084 2015

  44. [44]

    Evolving non-thermal electrons in simulations of black hole accretion.MNRAS2017, 470, 2367–2386

    Chael, A.A.; Narayan, R.; Sadowski, A. Evolving non-thermal electrons in simulations of black hole accretion.MNRAS2017, 470, 2367–2386. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1345

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/stx1345

  45. [45]

    Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , author =

    Howes, G.G. A prescription for the turbulent heating of astrophysical plasmas.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. Lett.2010,409, L104–L108. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00958.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00958.x 2010

  46. [46]

    Numerical Calculation of Magnetobremsstrahlung Emission and Absorption Coefficients

    Leung, P .K.; Gammie, C.F.; Noble, S.C. Numerical Calculation of Magnetobremsstrahlung Emission and Absorption Coefficients. ApJ2011,737, 21. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/737/1/21

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/737/1/21

  47. [47]

    Rybicki, G.B.; Lightman, A.P .Radiative Processes in Astrophysics; John Wiley & Sons: Hoboken, NJ, USA, 1979

    work page 1979

  48. [48]

    Dermer, C.D.; Menon, G.High Energy Radiation from Black Holes: Gamma Rays, Cosmic Rays, and Neutrinos; Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ, USA, 2009

    work page 2009

  49. [49]

    X-rays from active galactic nuclei.Astrophys

    Takahara, F.; Tsuruta, S.; Ichimaru, S. X-rays from active galactic nuclei.Astrophys. J.1981,251, 26–30. https://doi.org/10.1086/ 159438

    work page 1981

  50. [50]

    Accretion Flow Morphology in Numerical Simulations of Black Holes from the ngEHT Model Library: The Impact of Radiation Physics.Galaxies2023,11, 38

    Chatterjee, K.; Chael, A.; Tiede, P .; Mizuno, Y.; Emami, R.; Fromm, C.; Ricarte, A.; Blackburn, L.; Roelofs, F.; Johnson, M.D.; et al. Accretion Flow Morphology in Numerical Simulations of Black Holes from the ngEHT Model Library: The Impact of Radiation Physics.Galaxies2023,11, 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies11020038

    work page doi:10.3390/galaxies11020038

  51. [51]

    M., Ward-Thompson, D., & Andr \'e , P.\ 2005, , 360, 4, 1506

    Zdziarski, A.A.; Gierli ´ nski, M.; Rao, A.R.; Vadawale, S.V .; Mikołajewska, J. GRS 1915+105: The distance, radiative processes and energy-dependent variability.MNRAS2005,360, 825–838. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09112.x

    work page doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09112.x 1915

  52. [52]

    The Relationship between X-Ray Luminosity and Major Flare Launching in GRS 1915+105.Astrophys

    Punsly, B.; Rodriguez, J. The Relationship between X-Ray Luminosity and Major Flare Launching in GRS 1915+105.Astrophys. J. 2013,764, 173. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/173

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/764/2/173 1915

  53. [53]

    Long term variability of Cygnus X-1—V

    Grinberg, V .; Hell, N.; Pottschmidt, K.; Böck, M.; Nowak, M.A.; Rodriguez, J.; Bodaghee, A.; Cadolle Bel, M.; Case, G.L.; Hanke, M..; et al. Long term variability of Cygnus X-1—V . State definitions with all sky monitors.Astron. Astrophys.2013,554, A88. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201321128

    work page doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201321128 2013

  54. [54]

    An intermediate-mass black hole of over 500 solar masses in the galaxy ESO 243-49.Nature2009,460, 73

    Farrell, S.A.; Webb, N.A.; Barret, D.; Godet, O.; Rodrigues, J.M. An intermediate-mass black hole of over 500 solar masses in the galaxy ESO 243-49.Nature2009,460, 73

    work page

  55. [55]

    Investigating slim disk solutions for HLX-1 in ESO 243-49.Astrophys

    Godet, O.; Plazolles, B.; Kawaguchi, T.; Lasota, J.P .; Barret, D.; Farrell, S.A.; Braito, V .; Servillat, M.; Webb, N.; Gehrels, N. Investigating slim disk solutions for HLX-1 in ESO 243-49.Astrophys. J.2012,752, 34. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/752/ 1/34

    work page doi:10.1088/0004-637x/752/ 2012

  56. [56]

    A new lepto-hadronic model applied to the first simultaneous multiwavelength data set for Cygnus X–1.Mon

    Kantzas, D.; Markoff, S.; Beuchert, T.; Lucchini, M.; Chhotray, A.; Ceccobello, C.; Tetarenko, A.J.; Miller-Jones, J.C.A.; Bremer, M.; Garcia, J.A.; et al. A new lepto-hadronic model applied to the first simultaneous multiwavelength data set for Cygnus X–1.Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.2020,500, 2112–2126. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa3349. Universe2026,1...

    work page doi:10.1093/mnras/staa3349 2020

  57. [57]

    What is the hard spectral state in X-ray binaries? Insights from GRRMHD accretion flows simulations and polarization of their X-ray emission.arXiv2024

    Moscibrodzka, M. What is the hard spectral state in X-ray binaries? Insights from GRRMHD accretion flows simulations and polarization of their X-ray emission.arXiv2024. arXiv:2309.09087

    work page arXiv

  58. [58]

    Recipes for Jet Feedback and Spin Evolution of Black Holes with Strongly Magnetized Super-Eddington Accretion Disks.ApJL2023,954, L22

    Ricarte, A.; Narayan, R.; Curd, B. Recipes for Jet Feedback and Spin Evolution of Black Holes with Strongly Magnetized Super-Eddington Accretion Disks.ApJL2023,954, L22. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aceda5

    work page doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aceda5 2041

  59. [59]

    Rapid Black Hole Spin-down by Thick Magnetically Arrested Disks

    Lowell, B.; Jacquemin-Ide, J.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Duncan, A. Rapid Black Hole Spin-down by Thick Magnetically Arrested Disks. ApJ2024,960, 82. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad09af

    work page doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad09af

  60. [60]

    Misaligned magnetized accretion flows onto spinning black holes: Magneto-spin alignment, outflow power, and intermittent jets.PRD2025,112, 063013

    Chatterjee, K.; Kaaz, N.; Liska, M.; Tchekhovskoy, A.; Markoff, S. Misaligned magnetized accretion flows onto spinning black holes: Magneto-spin alignment, outflow power, and intermittent jets.PRD2025,112, 063013. https://doi.org/10.1103/hgj9-v4fk. Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note:The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those...

    work page doi:10.1103/hgj9-v4fk