pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17491 · v1 · pith:VNJZ3BIGnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · ⚛️ physics.optics

Overcoming noise-agility trade-off in integrated lasers for precision sensing

Di Yu , Yitian Tong , Yu Xia , Yuntao Zhu , Yuemin Li , Mingfei Liu , Zhaoting Geng , Yuhao Huang
show 11 more authors
Yaoran Huang Zheng Li Jie Wang Yunqi Fu Hongjie Liang Hao Fang Jinwen Lin Xuewen Chen Kang Li Xinlun Cai Chao Xiang
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:54 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords integrated laserphase noisefrequency agilityLiDARlithium niobatesynthetic feedbackoptical sensingPockels tuning
0
0 comments X

The pith

A hybrid integrated laser reaches 29 Hz linewidth and sub-exahertz tuning by using synthetic feedback in a moderate-Q lithium niobate cavity.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper demonstrates a way to build integrated lasers that deliver both very narrow linewidth and very rapid frequency tuning on the same device. Conventional designs face a trade-off because high-Q resonators reduce noise but also extend photon lifetimes and thereby slow tuning speed. The authors replace the need for ultrahigh Q with strong synthetic feedback inside a Pockels-tunable resonator-enhanced distributed Bragg reflector. They realize a 29 Hz short-term linewidth with a loaded Q of only 0.62 million, which relaxes the speed constraint and yields sub-exahertz tuning rates together with 0.14 percent chirp nonlinearity. The same laser then drives a frequency-modulated continuous-wave LiDAR system that reaches 1.7 times 10 to the minus 4 relative ranging precision at one million samples per second without extra linearization.

Core claim

The central claim is that strong synthetic feedback inside a Pockels-tunable resonator-enhanced distributed Bragg reflector suppresses phase noise sufficiently to produce a short-term linewidth of 29 Hz in a lithium niobate external cavity whose loaded Q is only 0.62 million. Because the moderate Q avoids long photon lifetimes, the laser simultaneously achieves sub-exahertz-per-second tuning rates and chirp nonlinearity as low as 0.14 percent. This performance directly enables a frequency-modulated continuous-wave LiDAR with relative ranging precision of 1.7 times 10 to the minus 4 at a 1 MSa s inverse measurement rate without complex chirp linearization, and supports fiber-optic acoustic传感s

What carries the argument

Strong synthetic feedback within a Pockels-tunable resonator-enhanced distributed Bragg reflector that suppresses phase noise at moderate Q.

If this is right

  • The laser supports sub-exahertz-per-second tuning rates with chirp nonlinearity of 0.14 percent.
  • It powers frequency-modulated continuous-wave LiDAR that achieves 1.7 times 10 to the minus 4 relative ranging precision at 1 MSa s inverse without linearization.
  • The same source detects sub-microstrain dynamic strain in fiber-optic acoustic sensing.
  • The architecture opens a route to cost-effective integrated platforms for high-speed precision optical measurements.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same synthetic-feedback approach could be adapted to other electro-optic materials to reach different operating wavelengths.
  • Moderate-Q designs may reduce fabrication complexity and therefore lower the cost of field-deployable sensing systems.
  • Combining this cavity with on-chip gain sections might produce fully monolithic versions of the laser.
  • Long-term drift measurements in uncontrolled environments would reveal whether the reported performance holds outside the laboratory.

Load-bearing premise

The synthetic feedback mechanism suppresses phase noise to the same ultralow level as high-Q self-injection locking while avoiding any photon-lifetime penalty on tuning speed.

What would settle it

Fabricate the hybrid laser and record its frequency-noise spectrum and tuning waveform; the measured short-term linewidth must reach 29 Hz and the tuning rate must exceed one exahertz per second with chirp nonlinearity below 0.2 percent.

read the original abstract

Lasers that combine narrow linewidths with rapid tunability are critical for applications such as coherent optical ranging, distributed fiber-optic sensing, and precision spectroscopy. Despite significant progress in integrated laser technologies, the concurrent realization of low phase noise and frequency agility on a single integrated platform remains challenging owing to a fundamental architectural trade-off: conventional integrated laser designs typically suppress phase noise via high-$Q$ resonators, yet the extended photon lifetimes inherent to such resonators intrinsically constrain tuning speed. Here, we address this noise-agility trade-off by introducing a laser architecture that achieves ultralow phase noise and ultrafast tunability simultaneously. Rather than relying on ultrahigh-$Q$ resonators for self-injection locking, our design employs strong synthetic feedback within a Pockels-tunable, resonator-enhanced distributed Bragg reflector to suppress phase noise. As a proof of concept, we demonstrate a hybrid integrated laser with a short-term linewidth of 29 Hz, realized using a lithium niobate external cavity with a loaded $Q$ of only 0.62 million. The adoption of a moderate resonator $Q$ relaxes the photon-lifetime constraint on tuning speed, enabling sub-exahertz-per-second tuning rates and a chirp nonlinearity as low as 0.14%. Leveraging this laser, we implement a frequency-modulated continuous-wave LiDAR system that achieves a relative ranging precision of $1.7 \times 10^{-4}$ at a measurement rate of $1\,\text{MSa s}^{-1}$, without requiring complex chirp linearization techniques. We further demonstrate fiber-optic acoustic sensing capable of detecting sub-$\mu\epsilon$ dynamic strain, underscoring the platform's versatility for high-speed precision optical measurements. Our work provides a route toward cost-effective yet high-performance sensing and metrology systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims to resolve the noise-agility trade-off in integrated lasers by introducing strong synthetic feedback in a Pockels-tunable, resonator-enhanced distributed Bragg reflector on a lithium niobate platform. It reports a hybrid laser achieving 29 Hz short-term linewidth at a moderate loaded Q of 0.62 million, sub-exahertz-per-second tuning rates, 0.14% chirp nonlinearity, and applications in FMCW LiDAR with 1.7e-4 relative ranging precision at 1 MSa/s and sub-microstrain fiber-optic acoustic sensing.

Significance. If validated, the approach could enable high-performance precision sensing and metrology on integrated platforms by decoupling narrow linewidth from the tuning-speed penalty of ultrahigh-Q resonators. The experimental metrics and application demonstrations provide a concrete path toward cost-effective systems, though the result's impact depends on confirming that the synthetic feedback, rather than integration quality or gain medium alone, produces the reported phase-noise suppression.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract and laser architecture description: the central claim that strong synthetic feedback suppresses phase noise to realize 29 Hz linewidth at only 0.62M loaded Q requires a quantitative model (e.g., feedback-modified Schawlow-Townes relation incorporating loop gain and delay) or a control experiment with feedback disabled. Without this, it is unclear whether the moderate-Q cavity alone or the synthetic mechanism accounts for the result, which is load-bearing for overcoming the stated trade-off.
  2. [Results] Results section on laser characterization: the reported short-term linewidth, tuning rates, and chirp nonlinearity lack explicit comparison to a baseline device without synthetic feedback or to standard cavity theory predictions at Q=0.62M. This omission weakens the attribution of performance gains to the proposed architecture.
minor comments (2)
  1. Include error bars, statistical uncertainties, and measurement bandwidth details for all key metrics (linewidth, nonlinearity, ranging precision) to allow full assessment of the experimental claims.
  2. [Methods] Clarify the exact implementation and strength quantification of the 'strong synthetic feedback' (e.g., via diagrams or equations in the methods) to improve reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments, which have helped us improve the clarity of our manuscript regarding the role of synthetic feedback. We respond to each major comment below and indicate the revisions made.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] Abstract and laser architecture description: the central claim that strong synthetic feedback suppresses phase noise to realize 29 Hz linewidth at only 0.62M loaded Q requires a quantitative model (e.g., feedback-modified Schawlow-Townes relation incorporating loop gain and delay) or a control experiment with feedback disabled. Without this, it is unclear whether the moderate-Q cavity alone or the synthetic mechanism accounts for the result, which is load-bearing for overcoming the stated trade-off.

    Authors: We concur that a quantitative model is important to substantiate the central claim. Accordingly, we have revised the manuscript to include a feedback-modified Schawlow-Townes relation that incorporates the loop gain and delay of the synthetic feedback. This model demonstrates that the 29 Hz linewidth is attributable to the strong synthetic feedback rather than the moderate Q alone, as the latter would yield a broader linewidth per standard theory. We have also added a note on the practical difficulties of performing a control experiment with feedback disabled in the current hybrid integration scheme. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Results] Results section on laser characterization: the reported short-term linewidth, tuning rates, and chirp nonlinearity lack explicit comparison to a baseline device without synthetic feedback or to standard cavity theory predictions at Q=0.62M. This omission weakens the attribution of performance gains to the proposed architecture.

    Authors: We thank the referee for this observation. In the revised results section, we now provide explicit comparisons to standard cavity theory at Q = 0.62M. The expected linewidth from the unmodified Schawlow-Townes formula is calculated and contrasted with our experimental result. For tuning rates and chirp nonlinearity, we include benchmarks from literature on similar platforms without synthetic feedback. While a dedicated baseline device was not part of this study, these theoretical and comparative additions strengthen the attribution to the proposed architecture. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: results are direct experimental measurements

full rationale

The paper reports empirical performance metrics from a fabricated hybrid integrated laser device, including measured short-term linewidth of 29 Hz at loaded Q of 0.62 million, sub-exahertz tuning rates, 0.14% chirp nonlinearity, and LiDAR ranging precision of 1.7e-4 at 1 MSa/s. These are presented as direct observations rather than outputs of any derivation, prediction, or model that reduces to fitted inputs or self-citations by construction. The synthetic feedback mechanism is described conceptually in the abstract and text, but no equations, fitted parameters, or load-bearing self-citations are invoked to derive the reported numbers; the claims remain independent experimental outcomes.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the effectiveness of the introduced synthetic feedback mechanism combined with standard integrated optics fabrication and Pockels tuning; no explicit free parameters or invented particles are stated, but the feedback concept is the key novel element.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard principles of laser phase noise suppression via optical feedback apply to the synthetic feedback implementation
    Invoked implicitly when stating that synthetic feedback suppresses phase noise in place of high-Q self-injection locking.
invented entities (1)
  • strong synthetic feedback no independent evidence
    purpose: Suppress phase noise while permitting fast tuning in moderate-Q resonator
    Introduced as the core innovation enabling the reported performance; no independent falsifiable prediction outside the demonstration is provided in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5914 in / 1616 out tokens · 89368 ms · 2026-05-19T22:54:17.442852+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

90 extracted references · 90 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [2]

    Behroozpour, B.et al.Electronic-photonic integrated circuit for 3d microimaging.IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits52, 161–172 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [3]

    Riemensberger, J.et al.Massively parallel coherent laser ranging using a soliton microcomb.Nature581, 164–170 (2020)

    work page 2020

  3. [4]

    Cheng, Z.et al.On-chip silicon electro-optical modu- lator with ultra-high extinction ratio for fiber-optic dis- tributed acoustic sensing.Nature Communications14, 7409 (2023)

    work page 2023

  4. [5]

    A., Rosenthal, A

    Wissmeyer, G., Pleitez, M. A., Rosenthal, A. & Ntzi- achristos, V. Looking at sound: optoacoustics with all- optical ultrasound detection.Light: Science & Applica- tions7, 53 (2018)

    work page 2018

  5. [6]

    Corato-Zanarella, M.et al.Widely tunable and narrow- linewidth chip-scale lasers from near-ultraviolet to near- infrared wavelengths.Nature Photonics17, 157–164 (2023)

    work page 2023

  6. [7]

    & Silvestri, F

    Bianconi, S., Ribes-Pleguezuelo, P. & Silvestri, F. Re- quirements for next-generation integrated photonic fmcw lidar sources.nature communications16, 6739 (2025)

    work page 2025

  7. [8]

    Li, H.et al.Analysis and compensation of vibration in- duced beat frequency shift in ofdr based fiber-optic dis- tributed acoustic sensor.Journal of Lightwave Technol- ogy41, 381–392 (2022)

    work page 2022

  8. [9]

    & Yariv, A

    Satyan, N., Vasilyev, A., Rakuljic, G., Leyva, V. & Yariv, A. Precise control of broadband frequency chirps using optoelectronic feedback.Optics express17, 15991–15999 (2009)

    work page 2009

  9. [10]

    Li, Z.et al.High density lithium niobate photonic inte- grated circuits.Nature Communications14, 4856 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [11]

    S.et al.Monolithic piezoelectrically tun- able hybrid integrated laser with sub-fiber laser coher- ence.Optica12, 1442–1451 (2025)

    Voloshin, A. S.et al.Monolithic piezoelectrically tun- able hybrid integrated laser with sub-fiber laser coher- ence.Optica12, 1442–1451 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [12]

    Siddharth, A.et al.Ultrafast tunable photonic- integrated extended-dbr pockels laser.Nature Photonics 19, 709–717 (2025)

    work page 2025

  12. [13]

    Xue, S.et al.Pockels laser directly driving ultrafast op- tical metrology.Light: Science & Applications14, 209 (2025)

    work page 2025

  13. [14]

    A.et al.Ultrabroadband optical chirp lineariza- tion for precision metrology applications.Optics letters 34, 3692–3694 (2009)

    Roos, P. A.et al.Ultrabroadband optical chirp lineariza- tion for precision metrology applications.Optics letters 34, 3692–3694 (2009)

    work page 2009

  14. [15]

    & Eyal, A

    Arbel, D. & Eyal, A. Dynamic optical frequency domain reflectometry.Optics express22, 8823–8830 (2014)

    work page 2014

  15. [16]

    Li, H., Liu, Q., Chen, D., Deng, Y. & He, Z. High-spatial- resolution fiber-optic distributed acoustic sensor based onϕ-ofdr with enhanced crosstalk suppression.Optics Letters45, 563–566 (2020)

    work page 2020

  16. [17]

    Xiang, C., Morton, P. A. & Bowers, J. E. Ultra-narrow linewidth laser based on a semiconductor gain chip and extended si3n4 bragg grating.Optics letters44, 3825– 3828 (2019)

    work page 2019

  17. [18]

    Yu, D.et al.Resonator-enhanced distributed bragg re- flector lasers.Light: Science & Applications15, 142 (2026)

    work page 2026

  18. [19]

    Li, M.et al.Integrated pockels laser.Nature communi- cations13, 5344 (2022)

    work page 2022

  19. [20]

    Jin, W.et al.Hertz-linewidth semiconductor lasers using cmos-ready ultra-high-q microresonators.Nature Pho- tonics15, 346–353 (2021)

    work page 2021

  20. [21]

    W.et al.422 million intrinsic quality factor planar integrated all-waveguide resonator with sub-mhz linewidth.Nature communications12, 934 (2021)

    Puckett, M. W.et al.422 million intrinsic quality factor planar integrated all-waveguide resonator with sub-mhz linewidth.Nature communications12, 934 (2021)

    work page 2021

  21. [22]

    Xiang, C.et al.3d integration enables ultralow-noise isolator-free lasers in silicon photonics.Nature620, 78– 85 (2023)

    work page 2023

  22. [23]

    & Lonˇ car, M

    Zhang, M., Wang, C., Cheng, R., Shams-Ansari, A. & Lonˇ car, M. Monolithic ultra-high-q lithium niobate mi- croring resonator.Optica4, 1536–1537 (2017)

    work page 2017

  23. [24]

    Photonics Research12, A63–A68 (2024)

    Zhu, X.et al.Twenty-nine million intrinsic q-factor monolithic microresonators on thin-film lithium niobate. Photonics Research12, A63–A68 (2024)

    work page 2024

  24. [25]

    Photonic-crystal microresonator-based LiDAR engine

    Nishimoto, K., Ulanov, A. E., Wildi, T. & Herr, T. Photonic-crystal microresonator-based lidar engine. arXiv preprint arXiv:2605.05069(2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  25. [26]

    Reep, T.et al.Compact microgear reflector-based laser heterogeneously integrated on a sin platform.Optics Let- ters50, 7207–7210 (2025)

    work page 2025

  26. [27]

    Kondratiev, N.et al.Self-injection locking of a laser diode to a high-q wgm microresonator.Optics Express 25, 28167–28178 (2017)

    work page 2017

  27. [28]

    C-band RSOA

    Shenzhen photonx technology co.,ltd. C-band RSOA

    work page

  28. [29]

    & Burnham, R

    Streifer, W., Scifres, D. & Burnham, R. Coupled wave analysis of dfb and dbr lasers.IEEE Journal of Quantum 10 Electronics13, 134–141 (1977)

    work page 1977

  29. [30]

    Wang, S.et al.High-performance integrated laser based on thin-film lithium niobate photonics for coherent rang- ing.Laser & Photonics Reviews18, 2400224 (2024)

    work page 2024

  30. [31]

    Yuan, Z.et al.Correlated self-heterodyne method for ultra-low-noise laser linewidth measurements.Optics Ex- press30, 25147–25161 (2022)

    work page 2022

  31. [33]

    Li, G.et al.Ring resonator modulators in silicon for interchip photonic links.IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics19, 95–113 (2013)

    work page 2013

  32. [34]

    Yang, J.et al.High-ranging-precision fmcw lidar with adaptive pre-distortion of current injection to a semicon- ductor laser.Journal of Lightwave Technology42, 1870– 1876 (2023)

    work page 2023

  33. [35]

    Lukashchuk, A.et al.Photonic-electronic integrated circuit-based coherent lidar engine.Nature Communi- cations15, 3134 (2024)

    work page 2024

  34. [36]

    Liu, C.et al.Highly-linear and wavelength-tunable frequency-modulated continuous-wave hybrid-integrated laser.Laser & Photonics Reviews18, 2300882 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [37]

    Liu, C.et al.Fast-tuning and narrow-linewidth hybrid laser for fmcw ranging.Laser & Photonics Reviews19, 2401338 (2025)

    work page 2025

  36. [38]

    Han, K.et al.High-performance fmcw ranging empow- ered by iii-v/si3n4 hybrid external cavity laser.Journal of Lightwave Technology44, 1068–1078 (2026)

    work page 2026

  37. [39]

    Zhu, Y., Fan, X., Wan, Y., Zhang, S. & He, Z. High-precision distributed magnetic field sensing using polarization-sensitive tgd-ofdr based on quaternion anal- ysis.Optics Letters50, 5574–5577 (2025)

    work page 2025

  38. [40]

    Wu, Y.et al.Electro-optic-locked, frequency-agile inte- grated pockels laser driving ultra-precise ranging.Laser & Photonics Reviews19, e00245 (2025)

    work page 2025

  39. [41]

    J.et al.Coprocessed heterogeneous near- infrared lasers on thin-film lithium niobate.Optics Let- ters49, 1197–1200 (2024)

    Morin, T. J.et al.Coprocessed heterogeneous near- infrared lasers on thin-film lithium niobate.Optics Let- ters49, 1197–1200 (2024)

    work page 2024

  40. [42]

    Li, M.et al.Heterogeneously-integrated lasers on thin film lithium niobate.Nanophotonics14, 4739–4748 (2025)

    work page 2025

  41. [43]

    Optica7, 386–393 (2020)

    Op de Beeck, C.et al.Heterogeneous iii-v on silicon nitride amplifiers and lasers via microtransfer printing. Optica7, 386–393 (2020)

    work page 2020

  42. [44]

    & Kuyken, B

    Niels, M., Vandekerckhove, T., De Jaeger, L., Billet, M. & Kuyken, B. Advances in micro-transfer printing of lithium niobate thin-films for silicon photonic devices. Nanophotonics15, e70042 (2026)

    work page 2026

  43. [45]

    Cai, M.et al.Erbium-doped lithium niobate thin film waveguide amplifier with 16 db internal net gain.IEEE journal of selected topics in quantum electronics28, 1–8 (2021)

    work page 2021

  44. [46]

    & Lonˇ car, M

    Desiatov, B. & Lonˇ car, M. Silicon photodetector for inte- grated lithium niobate photonics.Applied Physics Letters 115(2019)

    work page 2019

  45. [47]

    Zhang, X., Kwon, K., Henriksson, J., Luo, J. & Wu, M. C. A large-scale microelectromechanical-systems- based silicon photonics lidar.Nature603, 253–258 (2022)

    work page 2022

  46. [48]

    Hu, Y.et al.Integrated electro-optics on thin-film lithium niobate.Nature Reviews Physics7, 237–254 (2025)

    work page 2025

  47. [49]

    & Henry, C

    Kazarinov, R. & Henry, C. The relation of line narrow- ing and chirp reduction resulting from the coupling of a semiconductor laser to passive resonator.IEEE Journal of quantum electronics23, 1401–1409 (2003)

    work page 2003

  48. [50]

    A., Huang, D

    Tran, M. A., Huang, D. & Bowers, J. E. Tutorial on nar- row linewidth tunable semiconductor lasers using si/iii-v heterogeneous integration.APL photonics4(2019)

    work page 2019

  49. [51]

    M.et al.Low phase noise self-injection-locked diode laser with a high-q fiber resonator: model and ex- periment.Optics Letters49, 1933–1936 (2024)

    Ousaid, S. M.et al.Low phase noise self-injection-locked diode laser with a high-q fiber resonator: model and ex- periment.Optics Letters49, 1933–1936 (2024)

    work page 1933

  50. [52]

    & Kim, D

    Ahn, T.-J. & Kim, D. Y. Analysis of nonlinear frequency sweep in high-speed tunable laser sources using a self- homodyne measurement and hilbert transformation.Ap- plied optics46, 2394–2400 (2007)

    work page 2007

  51. [53]

    & Tiemann, B

    Buck, J., Malm, A., Zakel, A., Krause, B. & Tiemann, B. High-resolution 3d coherent laser radar imaging. In Laser Radar Technology and Applications XII, vol. 6550, 9–17 (SPIE, 2007)

    work page 2007

  52. [54]

    A., Wu, M

    Behroozpour, B., Sandborn, P. A., Wu, M. C. & Boser, B. E. Lidar system architectures and circuits.IEEE Communications Magazine55, 135–142 (2017)

    work page 2017

  53. [55]

    photonics

    N. photonics. Koheras adjustik x15

    work page

  54. [56]

    Siddharth, A.et al.Piezoelectrically tunable, narrow linewidth photonic integrated extended-dbr lasers.Op- tica11, 1062–1069 (2024)

    work page 2024

  55. [57]

    Van Rees, A.et al.Ring resonator enhanced mode-hop- free wavelength tuning of an integrated extended-cavity laser.Optics express28, 5669–5683 (2020)

    work page 2020

  56. [58]

    Lihachev, G.et al.Low-noise frequency-agile photonic integrated lasers for coherent ranging.Nature communi- cations13, 3522 (2022)

    work page 2022

  57. [59]

    Lihachev, G.et al.Frequency agile photonic integrated external cavity laser.APL Photonics9(2024)

    work page 2024

  58. [60]

    Huang, D.et al.High-power sub-khz linewidth lasers fully integrated on silicon.Optica6, 745–752 (2019)

    work page 2019

  59. [61]

    A.et al.Ring-resonator based widely-tunable narrow-linewidth si/inp integrated lasers.IEEE Jour- nal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics26, 1–14 (2019)

    Tran, M. A.et al.Ring-resonator based widely-tunable narrow-linewidth si/inp integrated lasers.IEEE Jour- nal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics26, 1–14 (2019)

    work page 2019

  60. [62]

    11 Methods Device fabrication.The TFLN external-cavity chip is fabricated on a 6-inch lithium-niobate-on-insulator wafer using a wafer-scale process

    Pintus, P.et al.Demonstration of large mode-hop- free tuning in narrow-linewidth heterogeneous integrated laser.Journal of Lightwave Technology41, 6723–6734 (2023). 11 Methods Device fabrication.The TFLN external-cavity chip is fabricated on a 6-inch lithium-niobate-on-insulator wafer using a wafer-scale process. The wafer consists of a 360- nm-thick X-cu...

    work page 2023

  61. [63]

    Self-injection-locked laser 3

    work page

  62. [64]

    Analysis of laser chirp linearity 6 C

    Numerical simulations 5 B. Analysis of laser chirp linearity 6 C. Reflection characteristics of microring resonators under high-speed modulation 9 D. Parameter optimization of RE-DBR external cavity 10 E. Design of low-loss second-order Bragg gratings 12 F. Analysis of thermal fluctuations in lithium niobate resonators 13 G. Phase-noise-limited ranging pr...

    work page

  63. [65]

    Its effective cavity length and peak reflectivity are [2] Leff = tanh(κglg) 2κg Rg = tanh2(κglg), (S3) whereκ g is the grating coupling coefficient andl g is the grating length

    E-DBR laser For an E-DBR laser, the external cavity is a waveguide Bragg grating. Its effective cavity length and peak reflectivity are [2] Leff = tanh(κglg) 2κg Rg = tanh2(κglg), (S3) whereκ g is the grating coupling coefficient andl g is the grating length. In narrow-linewidth E-DBR lasers, the effective cavity length is dominated by the external cavity...

    work page

  64. [66]

    Self-injection-locked laser The frequency noise power spectral density of a self-injection-locked laser diode is given by [5]: Sν,locked(f) = 1 + 4 f ν 2 Q2 r 1 +ρ Qr Ql 2 + 4 f ν 2 Q2r Sν,free(f),(S12) whereS ν,free(f) is the frequency noise spectrum of the free-running laser diode,fis the offset frequency,νis the laser frequency,Q r is the loaded qualit...

    work page

  65. [67]

    RE-DBR laser The frequency noise characteristics of RE-DBR lasers were theoretically analyzed in Ref. [6]. Taking into account the wavelength selectivity of the external cavity, the intrinsic linewidth is given by ∆ν= ∆ν 0 ng,alaπ nglrF 2 ,(S17) where ∆ν 0 denotes the linewidth of a Fabry-P´ erot laser diode with a front mirror reflectivity equal to the p...

    work page

  66. [68]

    S11, S16, and S21

    Numerical simulations To quantitatively compare the trade-off between linewidth and frequency agility in E-DBR, SIL, and RE-DBR lasers, we plot the theoretical intrinsic linewidth against the ringdown-limited tuning rate using Eqs. S11, S16, and S21. The result is shown in Fig. S1, and the corresponding parameters are summarized in Table S1. For a fair co...

    work page

  67. [69]

    Transmission and reflection spectra of a resonance

    work page

  68. [70]

    S7:Characterization of waveguide Bragg grating and E-DBR laser

    Optical spectrum a b Wavelength (nm) 1550 15601552 1554 1556 1558 2 𝜇𝜇m Extended Data Fig. S7:Characterization of waveguide Bragg grating and E-DBR laser. a, Transmis- sion and reflection spectra of the Bragg grating. The inset shows a SEM image of the device.b, Optical spectrum of an E-DBR laser consisting of a RSOA and the grating as an external cavity,...

    work page

  69. [71]

    & Henry, C

    Kazarinov, R. & Henry, C. The relation of line narrowing and chirp reduction resulting from the coupling of a semiconductor laser to passive resonator.IEEE Journal of quantum electronics23, 1401–1409 (2003)

    work page 2003

  70. [72]

    A., Huang, D

    Tran, M. A., Huang, D. & Bowers, J. E. Tutorial on narrow linewidth tunable semiconductor lasers using si/iii-v hetero- geneous integration.APL photonics4(2019)

    work page 2019

  71. [73]

    Xiang, C., Morton, P. A. & Bowers, J. E. Ultra-narrow linewidth laser based on a semiconductor gain chip and extended si3n4 bragg grating.Optics letters44, 3825–3828 (2019)

    work page 2019

  72. [74]

    Siddharth, A.et al.Ultrafast tunable photonic-integrated extended-dbr pockels laser.Nature Photonics19, 709–717 (2025)

    work page 2025

  73. [75]

    M.et al.Low phase noise self-injection-locked diode laser with a high-q fiber resonator: model and experiment

    Ousaid, S. M.et al.Low phase noise self-injection-locked diode laser with a high-q fiber resonator: model and experiment. Optics Letters49, 1933–1936 (2024)

    work page 1933

  74. [76]

    Yu, D.et al.Resonator-enhanced distributed bragg reflector lasers.Light: Science & Applications15, 142 (2026)

    work page 2026

  75. [77]

    Snigirev, V.et al.Ultrafast tunable lasers using lithium niobate integrated photonics.Nature615, 411–417 (2023)

    work page 2023

  76. [78]

    Xiang, C.et al.3d integration enables ultralow-noise isolator-free lasers in silicon photonics.Nature620, 78–85 (2023)

    work page 2023

  77. [79]

    Jin, W.Ultra-Low-Loss Silicon Nitride Photonic Integrated Circuits for Highly Coherent Lasers. Ph.D. thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara (2022)

    work page 2022

  78. [80]

    M., Arbabi, A

    Kang, Y. M., Arbabi, A. & Goddard, L. L. A microring resonator with an integrated bragg grating: a compact replacement for a sampled grating distributed bragg reflector.Optical and quantum electronics41, 689–697 (2009)

    work page 2009

  79. [81]

    M., Arbabi, A

    Kang, Y. M., Arbabi, A. & Goddard, L. L. Engineering the spectral reflectance of microring resonators with integrated reflective elements.Optics Express18, 16813–16825 (2010)

    work page 2010

  80. [82]

    Okamoto, K.Fundamentals of optical waveguides(Elsevier, 2021)

    work page 2021

Showing first 80 references.