pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17663 · v1 · pith:JPJKUDBJnew · submitted 2026-05-17 · 🧮 math.CA · math.FA

A Banach space that distinguishes two maximal operators

Vjekoslav Kova\v{c} This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 22:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.CA math.FA
keywords maximal operatorsBanach spacestranslation-invariantM^diamondM^sharpMaz'ya-Shaposhnikovaopen problems
0
0 comments X p. Extension
pith:JPJKUDBJ Add to your LaTeX paper What is a Pith Number? 
\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{JPJKUDBJ}

Prints a linked pith:JPJKUDBJ badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

There exists a translation-invariant Banach space of locally integrable functions on which M^diamond is bounded but the sharp maximal operator M^sharp is not.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper constructs a translation-invariant Banach space of locally integrable functions to show that the non-classical maximal operator M^diamond is bounded on it while the sharp maximal operator M^sharp is not. This construction directly addresses and answers one of Maz'ya's open questions from a list of 75 problems in analysis. A sympathetic reader cares because it demonstrates that these two operators are fundamentally different in their boundedness properties on Banach spaces, which has implications for how maximal operators are used in real analysis. The example is concrete and can be studied further to understand the differences between classical and non-classical maximal operators.

Core claim

We construct a translation-invariant Banach space of locally integrable functions on which M^diamond is bounded, but the sharp maximal operator M^sharp is not. This answers one of Maz'ya's questions from a collection of 75 open problems in analysis.

What carries the argument

The translation-invariant Banach space of locally integrable functions on which the boundedness of M^diamond holds but that of M^sharp does not.

If this is right

  • Answers Maz'ya's open problem on distinguishing the operators.
  • Shows that M^diamond and M^sharp are not equivalent for boundedness on all such spaces.
  • Provides a concrete example for further investigation in harmonic analysis.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This space might have additional properties worth studying, such as its dual or embedding into other spaces.
  • Similar constructions could be attempted for other pairs of operators to see if distinctions are common.

Load-bearing premise

The space is a genuine Banach space that is translation-invariant and the boundedness and unboundedness claims for the two operators are valid.

What would settle it

Direct check that the defined space satisfies the Banach space axioms, is translation-invariant, and that the operator norm of M^diamond is finite while that of M^sharp is infinite.

read the original abstract

Maz'ya and Shaposhnikova introduced a non-classical maximal operator $M^\diamond$ as the maximal convolution with the vector-valued signum kernel truncated to centered balls. We construct a translation-invariant Banach space of locally integrable functions on which $M^\diamond$ is bounded, but the sharp maximal operator $M^\sharp$ is not. This answers one of Maz'ya's questions from a collection of 75 open problems in analysis.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript constructs a translation-invariant Banach space of locally integrable functions on which the non-classical maximal operator M^diamond (defined via maximal convolution with a vector-valued signum kernel truncated to centered balls, following Maz'ya-Shaposhnikova) is bounded, while the sharp maximal operator M^sharp is unbounded. This explicit construction answers one of Maz'ya's open questions from a list of 75 problems in analysis.

Significance. If the construction holds, the result is significant because it furnishes a concrete, translation-invariant Banach space separating the boundedness properties of M^diamond and M^sharp. The paper receives credit for delivering an explicit construction rather than an abstract existence argument, directly resolving a specific open problem in the theory of maximal operators.

minor comments (2)
  1. §1 (Introduction): recall the precise definitions of M^diamond and M^sharp with direct citations to Maz'ya-Shaposhnikova to ensure the distinction is self-contained for readers unfamiliar with the 75-problem list.
  2. The norm estimates in the verification that the constructed space is complete and translation-invariant could be collected in a single lemma for easier reference.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, for recognizing the significance of our explicit construction, and for recommending minor revision. The report accurately captures that we furnish a concrete translation-invariant Banach space separating the boundedness properties of M^♦ and M^♯, directly resolving one of Maz'ya's open questions. No specific major comments appear in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Explicit construction with no circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents an explicit construction of a translation-invariant Banach space of locally integrable functions on which M^diamond is bounded but M^sharp is not, directly answering an open question of Maz'ya. This is an existence result via concrete construction rather than any derivation, prediction, or ansatz that reduces to its own inputs by definition or self-citation. No load-bearing steps of the enumerated circular kinds appear; the boundedness claims rest on verifying the space's properties under the given operator definitions, which are external to the construction itself. The result is self-contained against external benchmarks and does not rely on fitted parameters renamed as predictions or uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on the existence and properties of the newly constructed space together with the standard definitions of the two maximal operators from prior work.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Standard axioms of Banach spaces, translation invariance, and local integrability of functions.
    These are background facts from functional analysis invoked to define the space and the operators.
invented entities (1)
  • The specific translation-invariant Banach space no independent evidence
    purpose: To serve as a counterexample separating boundedness of M^diamond and M^sharp
    The space is defined within the paper for this purpose; no independent existence proof outside the construction is given in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5584 in / 1166 out tokens · 49123 ms · 2026-05-19T22:02:48.697875+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 44 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Maximal functions in Sobolev spaces

    Daniel Aalto and Juha Kinnunen. Maximal functions in Sobolev spaces. InSobolev spaces in mathe- matics. I, volume 8 ofInt. Math. Ser. (N. Y.), pages 25–67. Springer, New York, 2009.doi:10.1007/ 978-0-387-85648-3\_2

    work page 2009

  2. [2]

    02251 [math.AG]

    David Beltran, Cristian Gonz´ alez-Riquelme, Jos´ e Madrid, and Julian Weigt. Continuity of the gradient of the fractional maximal operator onW 1,1(Rd).Math. Res. Lett., 30(3):689–707, 2023.doi:10.4310/mrl. 2023.v30.n3.a3

    work page doi:10.4310/mrl 2023

  3. [3]

    Regularity of the centered fractional maximal function on radial functions

    David Beltran and Jos´ e Madrid. Regularity of the centered fractional maximal function on radial functions. J. Funct. Anal., 279(8):108686, 28, 2020.doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108686

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2020.108686 2020

  4. [4]

    Endpoint Sobolev continuity of the fractional maximal function in higher dimensions.Int

    David Beltran and Jos´ e Madrid. Endpoint Sobolev continuity of the fractional maximal function in higher dimensions.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 2021(22):17316–17342, 2021.doi:10.1093/imrn/rnz281

    work page doi:10.1093/imrn/rnz281 2021

  5. [5]

    Regularity of fractional maximal functions through Fourier multipliers.J

    David Beltran, Jo˜ ao Pedro Ramos, and Olli Saari. Regularity of fractional maximal functions through Fourier multipliers.J. Funct. Anal., 276(6):1875–1892, 2019.doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2018.11.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2018.11.004 2019

  6. [6]

    Another characterization of BLO.Proc

    Colin Bennett. Another characterization of BLO.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 85(4):552–556, 1982.doi: 10.2307/2044064

    work page doi:10.2307/2044064 1982

  7. [7]

    DeVore, and Robert Sharpley

    Colin Bennett, Ronald A. DeVore, and Robert Sharpley. Weak-L ∞ and BMO.Ann. of Math. (2), 113(3):601–611, 1981.doi:10.2307/2006999

    work page doi:10.2307/2006999 1981

  8. [8]

    Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988

    Colin Bennett and Robert Sharpley.Interpolation of operators, volume 129 ofPure and Applied Mathe- matics. Academic Press, Inc., Boston, MA, 1988

    work page 1988

  9. [9]

    Stephen M. Buckley. Is the maximal function of a Lipschitz function continuous?Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math., 24(2):519–528, 1999

    work page 1999

  10. [10]

    On the variation of maximal operators of convolution type II.Rev

    Emanuel Carneiro, Renan Finder, and Mateus Sousa. On the variation of maximal operators of convolution type II.Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 34(2):739–766, 2018.doi:10.4171/RMI/1002

    work page doi:10.4171/rmi/1002 2018

  11. [11]

    Sunrise strategy for the continuity of maximal operators.J

    Emanuel Carneiro, Cristian Gonz´ alez-Riquelme, and Jos´ e Madrid. Sunrise strategy for the continuity of maximal operators.J. Anal. Math., 148(1):37–84, 2022.doi:10.1007/s11854-022-0222-7

    work page doi:10.1007/s11854-022-0222-7 2022

  12. [12]

    Derivative bounds for fractional maximal functions.Trans

    Emanuel Carneiro and Jos´ e Madrid. Derivative bounds for fractional maximal functions.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 369(6):4063–4092, 2017.doi:10.1090/tran/6844

    work page doi:10.1090/tran/6844 2017

  13. [13]

    Emanuel Carneiro, Jos´ e Madrid, and Lillian B. Pierce. Endpoint Sobolev and BV continuity for maximal operators.J. Funct. Anal., 273(10):3262–3294, 2017.doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2017.08.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2017.08.012 2017

  14. [14]

    Emanuel Carneiro and Benar F. Svaiter. On the variation of maximal operators of convolution type.J. Funct. Anal., 265(5):837–865, 2013.doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2013.05.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2013.05.012 2013

  15. [15]

    Coifman and Charles L

    Ronald R. Coifman and Charles L. Fefferman. Weighted norm inequalities for maximal functions and singular integrals.Studia Math., 51:241–250, 1974.doi:10.4064/sm-51-3-241-250

    work page doi:10.4064/sm-51-3-241-250 1974

  16. [16]

    Coifman and Richard Rochberg

    Ronald R. Coifman and Richard Rochberg. Another characterization of BMO.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 79(2):249–254, 1980.doi:10.2307/2043245

    work page doi:10.2307/2043245 1980

  17. [17]

    Cruz-Uribe and Alberto Fiorenza.Variable Lebesgue spaces

    David V. Cruz-Uribe and Alberto Fiorenza.Variable Lebesgue spaces. Applied and Numerical Har- monic Analysis. Birkh¨ auser/Springer, Heidelberg, 2013. Foundations and harmonic analysis.doi:10.1007/ 978-3-0348-0548-3

    work page 2013

  18. [18]

    Maximal function on generalized Lebesgue spacesL p(·).Math

    Lars Diening. Maximal function on generalized Lebesgue spacesL p(·).Math. Inequal. Appl., 7(2):245–253, 2004.doi:10.7153/mia-07-27

    work page doi:10.7153/mia-07-27 2004

  19. [19]

    Fefferman and Elias M

    Charles L. Fefferman and Elias M. Stein. Some maximal inequalities.Amer. J. Math., 93:107–115, 1971. doi:10.2307/2373450. 12 VJEKOSLAV KOVA ˇC

    work page doi:10.2307/2373450 1971

  20. [20]

    Fefferman and Elias M

    Charles L. Fefferman and Elias M. Stein.H p spaces of several variables.Acta Math., 129(3-4):137–193, 1972.doi:10.1007/BF02392215

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02392215 1972

  21. [21]

    Mac´ ıas, and Jos´ e Luis Torrea

    Jos´ e Garc´ ıa-Cuerva, Roberto A. Mac´ ıas, and Jos´ e Luis Torrea. Maximal operators and B.M.O. for Banach lattices.Proc. Edinburgh Math. Soc. (2), 41(3):585–609, 1998.doi:10.1017/S001309150001991X

    work page doi:10.1017/s001309150001991x 1998

  22. [22]

    Rubio de Francia.Weighted norm inequalities and related topics, volume 116 ofNorth-Holland Mathematics Studies

    Jos´ e Garc´ ıa-Cuerva and Jos´ e L. Rubio de Francia.Weighted norm inequalities and related topics, volume 116 ofNorth-Holland Mathematics Studies. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1985. Notas de Matem´ atica, 104. [Mathematical Notes]

    work page 1985

  23. [23]

    On boundedness of maximal functions in Sobolev spaces.Ann

    Piotr Haj lasz and Jani Onninen. On boundedness of maximal functions in Sobolev spaces.Ann. Acad. Sci. Fenn. Math., 29(1):167–176, 2004

    work page 2004

  24. [24]

    Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 1985

    Jean-Pierre Kahane.Some random series of functions, volume 5 ofCambridge Studies in Advanced Math- ematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, second edition, 1985

    work page 1985

  25. [25]

    The Hardy–Littlewood maximal function of a Sobolev function.Israel J

    Juha Kinnunen. The Hardy–Littlewood maximal function of a Sobolev function.Israel J. Math., 100:117– 124, 1997.doi:10.1007/BF02773636

    work page doi:10.1007/bf02773636 1997

  26. [26]

    American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2021.doi:10.1090/surv/257

    Juha Kinnunen, Juha Lehrb¨ ack, and Antti V¨ ah¨ akangas.Maximal function methods for Sobolev spaces, volume 257 ofMathematical Surveys and Monographs. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2021.doi:10.1090/surv/257

    work page doi:10.1090/surv/257 2021

  27. [27]

    Regularity of the fractional maximal function.Bull

    Juha Kinnunen and Eero Saksman. Regularity of the fractional maximal function.Bull. London Math. Soc., 35(4):529–535, 2003.doi:10.1112/S0024609303002017

    work page doi:10.1112/s0024609303002017 2003

  28. [28]

    Boundedness of Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator in the framework of Lizorkin– Triebel spaces.Rev

    Soulaymane Korry. Boundedness of Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator in the framework of Lizorkin– Triebel spaces.Rev. Mat. Complut., 15(2):401–416, 2002.doi:10.5209/rev\_REMA.2002.v15.n2.16899

    work page doi:10.5209/rev 2002

  29. [29]

    Andrei K. Lerner. BMO-boundedness of the maximal operator for arbitrary measures.Israel J. Math., 159:243–252, 2007.doi:10.1007/s11856-007-0045-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s11856-007-0045-3 2007

  30. [30]

    Andrei K. Lerner. Some remarks on the Fefferman–Stein inequality.J. Anal. Math., 112:329–349, 2010. doi:10.1007/s11854-010-0032-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11854-010-0032-1 2010

  31. [31]

    Andrei K. Lerner. A note on the Coifman–Fefferman and Fefferman–Stein inequalities.Ark. Mat., 58(2):357–367, 2020.doi:10.4310/ARKIV.2020.v58.n2.a7

    work page doi:10.4310/arkiv.2020.v58.n2.a7 2020

  32. [32]

    Andrei K. Lerner. A note on the maximal operator on Banach function spaces.J. Geom. Anal., 35(6):Paper No. 177, 13, 2025.doi:10.1007/s12220-025-02015-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s12220-025-02015-2 2025

  33. [33]

    Banach function spaces done right.Indag

    Emiel Lorist and Zoe Nieraeth. Banach function spaces done right.Indag. Math. (N.S.), 35(2):247–268, 2024.doi:10.1016/j.indag.2023.11.004

    work page doi:10.1016/j.indag.2023.11.004 2024

  34. [34]

    Continuity of the maximal operator in Sobolev spaces.Proc

    Hannes Luiro. Continuity of the maximal operator in Sobolev spaces.Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 135(1):243– 251, 2007.doi:10.1090/S0002-9939-06-08455-3

    work page doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-06-08455-3 2007

  35. [35]

    The variation of the fractional maximal function of a radial function.Int

    Hannes Luiro and Jos´ e Madrid. The variation of the fractional maximal function of a radial function.Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN, 2019(17):5284–5298, 2019.doi:10.1093/imrn/rnx277

    work page doi:10.1093/imrn/rnx277 2019

  36. [36]

    Endpoint Sobolev and BV continuity for maximal operators II.Rev

    Jos´ e Madrid. Endpoint Sobolev and BV continuity for maximal operators II.Rev. Mat. Iberoam., 35(7):2151–2168, 2019.doi:10.4171/rmi/1115

    work page doi:10.4171/rmi/1115 2019

  37. [37]

    Sharp maximal functions associated with approximations of the identity in spaces of homogeneous type and applications.Studia Math., 161(2):113–145, 2004.doi:10.4064/sm161-2-2

    Jos´ e Mar´ ıa Martell. Sharp maximal functions associated with approximations of the identity in spaces of homogeneous type and applications.Studia Math., 161(2):113–145, 2004.doi:10.4064/sm161-2-2

    work page doi:10.4064/sm161-2-2 2004

  38. [38]

    Springer, Heidelberg, augmented edition, 2011

    Vladimir Gilelevich Maz’ya.Sobolev spaces with applications to elliptic partial differential equations, volume 342 ofFundamental Principles of Mathematical Sciences. Springer, Heidelberg, augmented edition, 2011. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15564-2

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-642-15564-2 2011

  39. [39]

    Seventy five (thousand) unsolved problems in analysis and partial dif- ferential equations.Integral Equations Operator Theory, 90(2):Paper No

    Vladimir Gilelevich Maz’ya. Seventy five (thousand) unsolved problems in analysis and partial dif- ferential equations.Integral Equations Operator Theory, 90(2):Paper No. 25, 44, 2018.doi:10.1007/ s00020-018-2460-8

    work page 2018

  40. [40]

    Sharp pointwise interpolation in- equalities for derivatives.Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 36:30–48, 2002.doi:10.1023/A: 1014478100799

    Vladimir Gilelevich Maz’ya and Tatyana Olegovna Shaposhnikova. Sharp pointwise interpolation in- equalities for derivatives.Functional Analysis and Its Applications, 36:30–48, 2002.doi:10.1023/A: 1014478100799

    work page doi:10.1023/a: 2002

  41. [41]

    Weighted norm inequalities for the Hardy maximal function.Trans

    Benjamin Muckenhoupt. Weighted norm inequalities for the Hardy maximal function.Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 165:207–226, 1972.doi:10.2307/1995882

    work page doi:10.2307/1995882 1972

  42. [42]

    Extrapolation in general quasi-Banach function spaces.J

    Zoe Nieraeth. Extrapolation in general quasi-Banach function spaces.J. Funct. Anal., 285(10):Paper No. 110130, 109, 2023.doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2023.110130

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2023.110130 2023

  43. [43]

    Stein.Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, volume No

    Elias M. Stein.Singular integrals and differentiability properties of functions, volume No. 30 ofPrinceton Mathematical Series. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 1970

    work page 1970

  44. [44]

    Zygmund.Trigonometric series

    Antoni S. Zygmund.Trigonometric series. Vol. I, II. Cambridge Mathematical Library. Cambridge Uni- versity Press, Cambridge, third edition, 2002. With a foreword by Robert A. Fefferman. Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, Bijeni ˇcka cesta 30, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia Email address:vjekovac@math.hr

    work page 2002