pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.17886 · v1 · pith:237XEA3Unew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 📡 eess.SY · cs.SY

Cooperative and Noncooperative Paradigms for Game-Theoretic Control of Socio-Technical Systems

Tamer Ba\c{s}ar , Tomohisa Hayakawa , Hideaki Ishii , Quanyan Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 09:39 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SY cs.SY
keywords game theorysocio-technical systemscooperative gamesnoncooperative gamesincentive designdistributed controlresiliencenetwork science
0
0 comments X

The pith

Game-theoretic frameworks model and control socio-technical systems by linking human incentives to cyber-physical infrastructures.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This tutorial reviews cooperative and noncooperative game-theoretic approaches for modeling, learning, and controlling socio-technical systems that couple human behavior and social interactions with networked infrastructures. It examines how strategic interactions, adaptation, and local decision-making produce collective outcomes under information and coordination limits. The work develops feedback-learning and incentive-design methods that connect equilibrium concepts to distributed control and mechanism design. It further addresses resilience against adversarial behavior, misinformation, and cascading failures. Emerging directions are outlined at the intersection of game theory, control, learning, and network science.

Core claim

The tutorial establishes that cooperative and noncooperative game-theoretic frameworks, including strategic, dynamic, matching, learning, and feedback-control methods, can analyze how local decisions and strategic interactions shape collective outcomes in socio-technical systems, while supporting incentive design and resilience under information and coordination constraints.

What carries the argument

Cooperative and noncooperative game-theoretic frameworks that couple human incentives, institutions, and social interactions with cyber-physical and networked infrastructures to analyze local decision-making and collective system outcomes.

If this is right

  • Local decision-making and strategic interactions determine collective outcomes in interconnected socio-technical networks.
  • Feedback-learning and incentive design link equilibrium analysis to distributed control and adaptation under limited information.
  • Resilience and security improve when adversarial behavior, misinformation, and cascading failures are modeled explicitly.
  • Interdisciplinary methods combining game theory with control and network science support the design of adaptive mechanisms.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These frameworks could guide policy experiments in domains like urban mobility or power markets to quantify gains from incentive alignment.
  • Integration with real-time data streams might allow online updating of equilibrium predictions in changing environments.
  • Extension to multi-agent reinforcement learning could test whether learned strategies converge to the reviewed game-theoretic equilibria.
  • Application to misinformation dynamics in social platforms could yield testable predictions for mechanism interventions.

Load-bearing premise

That the reviewed strategic, dynamic, cooperative, matching, learning, and feedback-control approaches can be directly applied to analyze and improve collective outcomes in real socio-technical systems under information and coordination constraints.

What would settle it

An empirical test in a concrete socio-technical system such as a traffic network or energy grid showing that applying these game-theoretic modeling and incentive-design methods produces no measurable improvement in collective outcomes or resilience compared with non-game-theoretic baselines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17886 by Hideaki Ishii, Quanyan Zhu, Tamer Ba\c{s}ar, Tomohisa Hayakawa.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Socio-technical systems consist of coupled social and technical layers. Human behav [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Coupled local and global feedback architecture in socio-technical systems. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Comparison of socio-technical systems without and with resilience. Without resilience, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

This tutorial presents cooperative and noncooperative game-theoretic frameworks for modeling, learning, and control in socio-technical systems, where human behavior, incentives, institutions, and social interactions are coupled with cyber-physical and networked infrastructures. The paper reviews strategic, dynamic, cooperative, matching, learning, and feedback-control approaches for analyzing how local decision-making, adaptation, and strategic interactions shape collective system outcomes. The tutorial further develops feedback-learning and incentive-design perspectives that connect equilibrium analysis with adaptation, distributed control, and mechanism design under information and coordination constraints. We also examine resilience and security challenges arising from adversarial behavior, misinformation, disruptions, and cascading failures in interconnected socio-technical networks. Finally, we discuss emerging research directions at the intersection of game theory, control, learning, and network science for resilient and adaptive socio-technical systems.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. This tutorial presents cooperative and noncooperative game-theoretic frameworks for modeling, learning, and control in socio-technical systems, where human behavior, incentives, institutions, and social interactions are coupled with cyber-physical and networked infrastructures. The paper reviews strategic, dynamic, cooperative, matching, learning, and feedback-control approaches for analyzing how local decision-making, adaptation, and strategic interactions shape collective system outcomes. The tutorial further develops feedback-learning and incentive-design perspectives that connect equilibrium analysis with adaptation, distributed control, and mechanism design under information and coordination constraints. It examines resilience and security challenges arising from adversarial behavior, misinformation, disruptions, and cascading failures in interconnected socio-technical networks, and discusses emerging research directions at the intersection of game theory, control, learning, and network science for resilient and adaptive socio-technical systems.

Significance. If the synthesis is comprehensive and well-organized, the tutorial could serve as a useful reference for researchers working at the intersection of game theory, control, and network science applied to socio-technical systems. Its value lies in connecting equilibrium concepts with learning, adaptation, and mechanism design under realistic constraints, and in identifying resilience issues in networked systems. As an expository work rather than a source of new theorems or data, its significance depends on the breadth of coverage and clarity of the connections drawn between existing paradigms.

minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract is lengthy and could be streamlined to more sharply emphasize the tutorial's unique synthesis of feedback-learning and incentive-design perspectives.
  2. [Review of Strategic, Dynamic, Cooperative, Matching, Learning, and Feedback-Control Approaches] In the sections reviewing matching and learning approaches, the notation for equilibrium concepts and adaptation dynamics could be standardized with a brief table or glossary to improve readability across the different frameworks.
  3. [Emerging Research Directions] The discussion of emerging research directions would benefit from explicit pointers to specific open questions or potential methodological extensions that build directly on the reviewed literature.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and positive assessment of our tutorial. The provided summary accurately reflects the scope and contributions of the manuscript, and we appreciate the recommendation for minor revision. No specific major comments were raised in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; this is an expository survey

full rationale

The manuscript is a tutorial that reviews existing strategic, dynamic, cooperative, matching, learning, and feedback-control approaches drawn from prior literature. No novel derivations, equations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions are asserted. Central content is synthesis and discussion of frameworks under information constraints, with no load-bearing steps that reduce by construction to self-definitions, fitted inputs, or self-citation chains. Any self-citations are standard for a survey and do not substitute for independent verification of a claimed result. The paper is self-contained as an overview against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

This is a review/tutorial paper. No new free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are introduced in the abstract; the content summarizes connections between game theory, control, and socio-technical systems from existing literature.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5682 in / 1082 out tokens · 28400 ms · 2026-05-20T09:39:31.581200+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

98 extracted references · 98 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Akyol, E., Langbort, C., and Ba s ar, T. (2016). Information-theoretic approach to strategic communication as a hierarchical game. Proceedings of the IEEE, 105(2), 205--218

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Amini, A., Bayiz, Y.E., and Topcu, U. (2024). Control of misinformation with safety and engagement guarantees. In 2024 American Control Conference (ACC), 151--158. IEEE

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Ba s ar, T. (2021). Robust designs through risk sensitivity: An overview. J. Systems Science and Complexity, 34, 1634--1665

    work page 2021

  4. [4]

    and Zaccour, G

    Ba s ar, T. and Zaccour, G. (eds.) (2018). Handbook of Dynamic Game Theory, Volume I (Theory of Dynamic Games), Volume II (Applications of Dynamic Games). Springer International Publishing

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    Ba s ar, T. (2020). Recent advances in mean field games. Proc. 7th International Conference on Control and Optimization with Industrial Applications, 1, 14

    work page 2020

  6. [6]

    and Zhu, Q

    Barreiro-Gomez, J. and Zhu, Q. (2022). Coalitional stochastic differential games for networks . IEEE Control Systems Letters, 6, 2707--2712

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Ba s ar, T. (1984). Affine incentive schemes for stochastic systems with dynamic information. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 22(2), 199--210

    work page 1984

  8. [8]

    Ba s ar, T. (2024). Inducement of desired behavior via soft policies. International Game Theory Review, 2440002

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    and Olsder, G.J

    Ba s ar, T. and Olsder, G.J. (1998). Dynamic Noncooperative Game Theory. SIAM

    work page 1998

  10. [10]

    and Zhu, Q

    Başar, T. and Zhu, Q. (2011). Prices of anarchy, information, and cooperation in differential games . Dynamic Games and Applications, 1(1), 50--73

    work page 2011

  11. [11]

    and Morris, S

    Bergemann, D. and Morris, S. (2019). Information design: A unified perspective. Journal of Economic Literature, 57(1), 44--95

    work page 2019

  12. [12]

    Braess, D. (1968). Über ein paradoxon aus der verkehrsplanung. Unternehmensforschung, 12, 258--268

    work page 1968

  13. [13]

    Caines, P.E. (2021). Mean field games. In Encyclopedia of Systems and Control, 1197--1202. Springer

    work page 2021

  14. [14]

    Carlier, G., Jimenez, C., and Santambrogio, F. (2008). Optimal transportation with traffic congestion and wardrop equilibria. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 47(3), 1330--1350

    work page 2008

  15. [15]

    Chanfreut, P., Maestre, J., Zhu, Q., and Camacho, E. (2020). No-regret learning for coalitional model predictive control . IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2), 3439--3444

    work page 2020

  16. [16]

    and Zhu, Q

    Chen, J. and Zhu, Q. (2017 a ). A Stackelberg game approach for two-level distributed energy management in smart grids . IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 9(6), 6554--6565

    work page 2017

  17. [17]

    Chen, J., Huang, Y., and Zhu, Q. (2022). Transactive resilience in renewable microgrids: A contract-theoretic approach. In 2022 56th Annual Conference on Information Sciences and Systems (CISS), 1--6. IEEE

    work page 2022

  18. [18]

    Chen, J., Touati, C., and Zhu, Q. (2017). A dynamic game analysis and design of infrastructure network protection and recovery: 125. ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review, 45(2), 128

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    Chen, J., Touati, C., and Zhu, Q. (2019). A dynamic game approach to strategic design of secure and resilient infrastructure network. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15, 462--474

    work page 2019

  20. [20]

    (2021 a )

    Chen, J., Touati, C., and Zhu, Q. (2021 a ). A dynamic game approach to designing secure interdependent IoT -enabled infrastructure network. IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering, 8(3), 2601--2612

    work page 2021

  21. [21]

    and Zhu, Q

    Chen, J. and Zhu, Q. (2016 a ). A game-theoretic framework for resilient and distributed generation control of renewable energies in microgrids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 8(1), 285--295

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    and Zhu, Q

    Chen, J. and Zhu, Q. (2016 b ). Interdependent network formation games with an application to critical infrastructures. In 2016 American Control Conference (ACC), 2870--2875. IEEE

    work page 2016

  23. [23]

    and Zhu, Q

    Chen, J. and Zhu, Q. (2017 b ). Security as a service for cloud-enabled internet of controlled things under advanced persistent threats: A contract design approach. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 12(11), 2736--2750

    work page 2017

  24. [24]

    and Zhu, Q

    Chen, J. and Zhu, Q. (2019 a ). A Game-and Decision-Theoretic Approach to Resilient Interdependent Network Analysis and Design. Springer

    work page 2019

  25. [25]

    and Zhu, Q

    Chen, J. and Zhu, Q. (2019 b ). Interdependent strategic security risk management with bounded rationality in the Internet of Things . IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 14(11), 2958--2971

    work page 2019

  26. [26]

    (2021 b )

    Chen, J., Zhu, Q., and Ba s ar, T. (2021 b ). Dynamic contract design for systemic cyber risk management of interdependent enterprise networks. Dynamic Games and Applications, 11(2), 294--325

    work page 2021

  27. [27]

    and Ding, S

    Du, W. and Ding, S. (2021). A survey on multi-agent deep reinforcement learning: from the perspective of challenges and applications. Artificial Intelligence Review, 54(5), 3215--3238

    work page 2021

  28. [28]

    Frihauf, P., Krstic, M., and Ba s ar, T. (2012). Nash equilibrium seeking in noncooperative games. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 57(5), 1192--1206

    work page 2012

  29. [29]

    and Tirole, J

    Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1991). Game Theory. MIT Press

    work page 1991

  30. [30]

    and Zhu, Q

    Fung, C. and Zhu, Q. (2016). FACID: A trust-based collaborative decision framework for intrusion detection networks . Ad Hoc Networks, 53, 17--31

    work page 2016

  31. [31]

    and Shapley, L.S

    Gale, D. and Shapley, L.S. (1962). College admissions and the stability of marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly, 69(1), 9--15

    work page 1962

  32. [32]

    and Pavel, L

    Gao, B. and Pavel, L. (2021). On passivity, reinforcement learning, and higher order learning in multiagent finite games. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 66(1), 121--136

    work page 2021

  33. [33]

    Goyal, S. (2023). Networks: An Economics Approach. MIT Press

    work page 2023

  34. [34]

    Huang, L., Chen, J., and Zhu, Q. (2017). A large-scale Markov game approach to dynamic protection of interdependent infrastructure networks. In International Conference on Decision and Game Theory for Security, 357--376. Springer

    work page 2017

  35. [35]

    Huang, L., Chen, J., and Zhu, Q. (2018). Factored Markov game theory for secure interdependent infrastructure networks. Game Theory for Security and Risk Management: From Theory to Practice, 99--126

    work page 2018

  36. [36]

    and Zhu, Q

    Huang, L. and Zhu, Q. (2023). Cognitive Security: A System-Scientific Approach. Springer Nature

    work page 2023

  37. [37]

    Huang, Y., Chen, J., Huang, L., and Zhu, Q. (2020). Dynamic games for secure and resilient control system design. National Science Review, 7(7), 1125--1141

    work page 2020

  38. [38]

    Huang, Y., Huang, L., and Zhu, Q. (2022). Reinforcement learning for feedback-enabled cyber resilience. Annual reviews in control, 53, 273--295

    work page 2022

  39. [39]

    and Zhu, Q

    Ishii, H. and Zhu, Q. (2022). Security and Resilience of Control Systems. Springer

    work page 2022

  40. [40]

    and Moselle, B

    Jackson, M.O. and Moselle, B. (2002). Coalition and party formation in a legislative voting game. Journal of Economic Theory, 103(1), 49--87

    work page 2002

  41. [41]

    Jackson, M. (2008). Social and Economic Networks. Princeton University Press

    work page 2008

  42. [42]

    and Tversky, A

    Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (2013). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. In Handbook of the Fundamentals of Financial Decision Making: Part I, 99--127. World Scientific

    work page 2013

  43. [43]

    Kairouz, P., McMahan, H.B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A.N., Bonawitz, K., Charles, Z., Cormode, G., Cummings, R., et al. (2021). Advances and open problems in federated learning. Foundations and Trends in Machine Learning , 14(1--2), 1--210

    work page 2021

  44. [44]

    Li, T., Hammar, K., Stadler, R., and Zhu, Q. (2024). Conjectural online learning with first-order beliefs in asymmetric information stochastic games. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.18781

    work page arXiv 2024

  45. [45]

    (2022 a )

    Li, T., Peng, G., Zhu, Q., and Ba s ar, T. (2022 a ). The confluence of networks, games, and learning a game-theoretic framework for multiagent decision making over networks. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 42(4), 35--67

    work page 2022

  46. [46]

    (2022 b )

    Li, T., Zhao, Y., and Zhu, Q. (2022 b ). The role of information structures in game-theoretic multi-agent learning. Annual Reviews in Control, 53, 296--314

    work page 2022

  47. [47]

    Liu, Y., Zhang, J., and Zhu, Q. (2011). Design of a reputation system based on dynamic coalition formation . In International Conference on Social Informatics, 135--144

    work page 2011

  48. [48]

    Manshaei, M.H., Zhu, Q., Alpcan, T., Ba s ar, T., and Hubaux, J.P. (2013). Game theory meets network security and privacy. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 45(3), 1--39

    work page 2013

  49. [49]

    and Ba s ar, T

    Mao, W. and Ba s ar, T. (2023). Provably efficient reinforcement learning in decentralized general-sum Markov games. Dynamic Games and Applications, 13(1), 165--186

    work page 2023

  50. [50]

    Maschler, M., Solan, E., and Zamir, S. (2013). Game Theory. Cambridge University Press

    work page 2013

  51. [51]

    and Langbort, C

    Massicot, O. and Langbort, C. (2019). Public signals and persuasion for road network congestion games under vagaries. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 51(34), 124--130

    work page 2019

  52. [52]

    Myerson, R.B. (1991). Game Theory: Analysis of Conflict. Harvard University Press

    work page 1991

  53. [53]

    Nash, J. (1950). Equilibrium points in N-person games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 36(1), 48--49

    work page 1950

  54. [54]

    Nash, J. (1951). Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics, 54(2), 286--295

    work page 1951

  55. [55]

    (2020 a )

    Nugraha, Y., Cetinkaya, A., Hayakawa, T., Ishii, H., and Zhu, Q. (2020 a ). Dynamic resilient graph games for state-dependent jamming attacks analysis on multi-agent systems. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 53(2), 3421--3426

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    (2020 b )

    Nugraha, Y., Cetinkaya, A., Hayakawa, T., Ishii, H., and Zhu, Q. (2020 b ). Dynamic resilient network games considering connectivity. In 2020 59th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 3779--3784. IEEE

    work page 2020

  57. [57]

    (2020 c )

    Nugraha, Y., Cetinkaya, A., Hayakawa, T., Ishii, H., and Zhu, Q. (2020 c ). Dynamic resilient network games with applications to multiagent consensus. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 8(1), 246--259

    work page 2020

  58. [58]

    Nugraha, Y., Cetinkaya, A., Hayakawa, T., Ishii, H., and Zhu, Q. (2021). Rolling horizon games for cluster formation of resilient multiagent systems. In 2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), 4829--4834. IEEE

    work page 2021

  59. [59]

    Nugraha, Y., Cetinkaya, A., Hayakawa, T., Ishii, H., and Zhu, Q. (2022). Rolling horizon games of resilient networks with non-uniform horizons. European Journal of Control, 68, 100693

    work page 2022

  60. [60]

    Oliveira, T.R., Rodrigues, V.H.P., Krstic, M., and Ba s ar, T. (2021). Nash equilibrium seeking in quadratic noncooperative games under two delayed information-sharing schemes. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 191(2), 700--735

    work page 2021

  61. [61]

    Pawlick, J., Colbert, E., and Zhu, Q. (2019). A game-theoretic taxonomy and survey of defensive deception for cybersecurity and privacy. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 52(4), 1--28

    work page 2019

  62. [62]

    Poveda, J.I., Krstic, M., and Ba s ar, T. (2022). Fixed-time Nash equilibrium seeking in time-varying networks. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 68(4), 1954--1969

    work page 2022

  63. [63]

    Roughgarden, T. (2005). Selfish Routing and the Price of Anarchy. MIT Press

    work page 2005

  64. [64]

    Sandholm, W.H. (2020). Evolutionary game theory. Complex social and behavioral systems: game theory and agent-based models, 573--608

    work page 2020

  65. [65]

    Sanjari, S., Bose, S., and Ba s ar, T. (2024). Incentive designs for Stackelberg games with a large number of followers and their mean-field limits. Dynamic Games and Applications. Online 23 May 2024

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Simhon, E., Hayel, Y., Starobinski, D., and Zhu, Q. (2016). Optimal information disclosure policies in strategic queueing games . Operations Research Letters, 44(1), 109--113

    work page 2016

  67. [67]

    Simon, H.A. (1990). Bounded rationality. Utility and Probability, 15--18

    work page 1990

  68. [68]

    Tembine, H., Zhu, Q., and Ba s ar, T. (2013). Risk-sensitive mean-field games. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 59(4), 835--850

    work page 2013

  69. [69]

    Velicheti, R.K., Bastopcu, M., and Ba s ar, T. (2023). Strategic information design in quadratic multidimensional persuasion games with two senders. In 2023 American Control Conference (ACC), 1716--1722. IEEE

    work page 2023

  70. [70]

    and Morgenstern, O

    von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press

    work page 1944

  71. [71]

    and Hayakawa, T

    Yan, Y. and Hayakawa, T. (2023 a ). Hierarchical noncooperative dynamical systems under intragroup and intergroup incentives. IEEE Transactions on Control of Network Systems, 11(2), 743--755

    work page 2023

  72. [72]

    and Hayakawa, T

    Yan, Y. and Hayakawa, T. (2023 b ). Pareto-improving incentive mechanism for noncooperative dynamical systems under sustainable budget constraint. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 69(7), 4291--4306

    work page 2023

  73. [73]

    Yang, H., Zhang, X., and Meng, Q. (2007). Stackelberg games and multiple equilibrium behaviors on networks. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 41(8), 841--861

    work page 2007

  74. [74]

    Yang, Y.T., Li, T., and Zhu, Q. (2023). Designing policies for truth: Combating misinformation with transparency and information design. In 2023 21st International Symposium on Modeling and Optimization in Mobile, Ad Hoc, and Wireless Networks (WiOpt), 127--134. IEEE

    work page 2023

  75. [75]

    (2021 a )

    Zhang, C., Xie, Y., Bai, H., Yu, B., Li, W., and Gao, Y. (2021 a ). A survey on federated learning. Knowledge-Based Systems, 216, 106775

    work page 2021

  76. [76]

    (2021 b )

    Zhang, K., Yang, Z., and Ba s ar, T. (2021 b ). Multi-agent reinforcement learning: A selective overview of theories and algorithms. In K.G.V. et al. (ed.), Handbook of Reinforcement Learning and Control, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control 325, 321--384. Springer Nature Switzerland AG

    work page 2021

  77. [77]

    Zhang, K., Sun, T., Tao, Y., Genc, S., Mallya, S., and Ba s ar, T. (2020). Robust multi-agent reinforcement learning with model uncertainty. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, 10571--10583

    work page 2020

  78. [78]

    (2021 c )

    Zhang, K., Yang, Z., and Ba s ar, T. (2021 c ). Decentralized multi-agent reinforcement learning with networked agents: Recent advances. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 22(6), 802--814

    work page 2021

  79. [79]

    and Zhu, Q

    Zhang, R. and Zhu, Q. (2019). A Game-Theoretic Cyber Insurance Framework for Incentive-Compatible Cyber Risk Management of Internet of Things . IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security, 15, 2026--2041

    work page 2019

  80. [80]

    and Zhu, Q

    Zhang, T. and Zhu, Q. (2021). Informational design of dynamic multi-agent system. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03052

    work page arXiv 2021

Showing first 80 references.