A Computationally Efficient Reciprocal Effective Roughness Model for Diffuse Scattering

Camillo Gentile; Enrico M. Vitucci; Giacomo Melloni; Jack Chuang; Nada Golmie; Samuel Berweger; Vittorio Degli Esposti

arxiv: 2605.17988 · v1 · pith:6FDQ7CLInew · submitted 2026-05-18 · 📡 eess.SP · physics.optics

A Computationally Efficient Reciprocal Effective Roughness Model for Diffuse Scattering

Giacomo Melloni , Enrico M. Vitucci , Vittorio Degli Esposti , Samuel Berweger , Jack Chuang , Camillo Gentile , Nada Golmie This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 01:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP physics.optics

keywords diffuse scatteringeffective roughnessray tracingmmWave propagationreciprocal modelcomputational efficiencyelectromagnetic modelingsurface roughness

0 comments

The pith

A directive reciprocal diffuse scattering model cuts ray-tracing computation by an order of magnitude while preserving physical consistency and accuracy.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a new formulation for modeling diffuse scattering from rough surfaces in ray-tracing simulations. It keeps the core structure of the existing Effective Roughness approach but replaces its computational path with a directive reciprocal version that runs far faster. At mmWave and sub-THz frequencies, where surface roughness produces significant scattered power, this change allows simulations of large environments with millions of facets to remain tractable. Tests on eight different materials confirm the faster model matches or slightly exceeds the accuracy of the original without needing extra corrections.

Core claim

The proposed directive reciprocal diffuse scattering model preserves the structure of the Effective Roughness approach while enabling an order-of-magnitude reduction in computational cost. Validation across eight materials shows no loss in accuracy and a slight improvement, demonstrating a scalable and physically meaningful solution for ray-tracing in scenarios where diffuse scattering is non-negligible.

What carries the argument

The directive reciprocal formulation of the effective roughness model, which maintains reciprocity and physical consistency for arbitrary surface roughness parameters and incidence angles by altering only the evaluation path rather than the underlying scattering lobes.

If this is right

Ray-tracing tools can now include diffuse scattering contributions up to 40 percent of received power without prohibitive slowdowns when scaling to millions of facets.
Material parameters in digital twins can be updated continuously during simulations of changing environments without repeated iterative tuning.
High-frequency propagation models become practical for dynamic scenarios at mmWave and sub-THz bands where wavelength-scale roughness dominates.
The same physical scattering structure can be reused in existing ray-tracing engines with only a change in the computation sequence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Wireless network planners could incorporate this model into city-scale digital twins to predict coverage more accurately at lower simulation cost.
The approach might extend to other scattering mechanisms if similar reciprocity-preserving shortcuts can be derived for them.
Testing the model in outdoor measurement campaigns with real building surfaces would check whether the lab-validated gains hold under uncontrolled conditions.

Load-bearing premise

The new directive reciprocal formulation remains physically consistent and reciprocal for arbitrary surface roughness parameters and incidence angles without additional tuning or post-hoc corrections.

What would settle it

Side-by-side comparison of predicted power patterns from the new model against measured scattering data for the same eight materials at multiple incidence angles and roughness values, checking whether reciprocity holds and accuracy stays equal or better.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.17988 by Camillo Gentile, Enrico M. Vitucci, Giacomo Melloni, Jack Chuang, Nada Golmie, Samuel Berweger, Vittorio Degli Esposti.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: a) Ratio between (8) and its maximum at ϑi = 0◦, highlighting the p cos(ϑi) trend.; b) Proposed model for different exponential values αR (each lobe is normalized by the maximum of the function in (4)); c) Ratio between the closed form of K(αR) in (12) and the simplified form in (13). present only one example here for brevity. II. BACKGROUND: RER MODEL This Section provides an overview of the ER approach a… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: a) Number of iterations for different exponential va [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Orientation index showing the evolution of tilt and r [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_5.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: Validation of the G-RER in (7) and RER in (4), showing t [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_6.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Ray-tracing (RT) has become central to site-specific electromagnetic propagation modeling in dynamic complex environments. Yet its computational burden grows sharply as high-fidelity digital twins of these environments scale to millions of facets whose material parameters must be continuously updated as the environment changes. The challenge is amplified at mmWave and sub-THz frequencies, where surface roughness becomes comparable to the wavelength and so diffuse scattering can account for up to 40% of the received power, making accurate yet tractable models essential. The popular Effective Roughness (ER) approach offers physical consistency but become increasingly costly when highly directive lobes are required or when parameters must be iteratively tuned. This communication introduces a directive, reciprocal diffuse scattering model that preserves the structure of the ER while enabling an order-of-magnitude reduction in computational cost. Validation across eight materials shows no loss in accuracy - and a slight improvement - demonstrating a scalable and physically meaningful solution for RT in scenarios where diffuse scattering is non-negligible.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

This paper gives a faster reciprocal take on the effective roughness model for diffuse scattering in ray tracing, but the supporting numbers and checks are still thin.

read the letter

The punchline is that the authors reworked the effective roughness approach into a directive reciprocal form that cuts computation by roughly an order of magnitude while claiming to keep the same accuracy on eight materials. That matters for mmWave and sub-THz ray-tracing where diffuse scattering can eat up 40 percent of the power and you have millions of facets to handle. They keep the core ER structure and only change the calculation path, which looks like a practical engineering move rather than a new physical theory. The efficiency gain and the reciprocity enforcement are the clear technical steps forward from the papers they cite. Validation across those eight materials with no accuracy loss and even a small improvement is the part that could make this worth using in digital-twin tools. The soft spots sit in the details that are not shown. The abstract gives no quantitative error figures, no description of how the roughness parameters were chosen, and no direct comparison to measured data or full-wave results. The stress-test point about reciprocity holding for arbitrary roughness values and angles is fair to raise; without a general proof or broad parameter sweep it is hard to know whether the reformulation introduces hidden approximations that break outside the tested set. If the math only works cleanly in the moderate-roughness regime, the claim of preserved physical consistency would need tightening. This is aimed at people who build or maintain site-specific propagation simulators for high-frequency wireless systems. A reader who already works with ER models will get the most out of it and can judge whether the speed-up is real in their own code. It is not a fundamental advance, but it is a solid incremental piece that deserves referee time so the derivation and the validation data can be checked properly. I would send it out for review rather than desk-reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 0 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a directive, reciprocal diffuse scattering model that preserves the structure of the Effective Roughness (ER) approach while changing only the computational path, achieving an order-of-magnitude reduction in cost for ray-tracing simulations at mmWave and sub-THz frequencies. Validation across eight materials is reported to show no loss in accuracy and a slight improvement over the original ER model.

Significance. If the reciprocity and physical consistency hold for arbitrary roughness parameters and angles without hidden tuning, the efficiency gain would enable scalable high-fidelity propagation modeling in large digital twins where diffuse scattering contributes substantially to received power. The approach could reduce the burden of iterative parameter tuning in dynamic environments.

major comments (2)

The abstract and validation results claim 'no loss in accuracy' and 'slight improvement' across eight materials, yet provide no quantitative error metrics, details on parameter selection, or comparisons to measured data or full-wave references. This is load-bearing for the central claim of retained accuracy.
The model formulation asserts that the directive reciprocal reformulation preserves ER physical consistency and reciprocity (S(θ_i, θ_s) = S(θ_s, θ_i)) for arbitrary normalized rms height kσ and incidence angles without extra tuning or corrections. No general proof or exhaustive parameter sweep is referenced, leaving open the possibility that angular weighting or normalization approximations hold only in moderate-roughness regimes.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive review and for recognizing the potential of the efficiency gains in our reciprocal effective roughness model. We address each major comment below with clarifications and proposed revisions to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: The abstract and validation results claim 'no loss in accuracy' and 'slight improvement' across eight materials, yet provide no quantitative error metrics, details on parameter selection, or comparisons to measured data or full-wave references. This is load-bearing for the central claim of retained accuracy.

Authors: We agree that the abstract would be strengthened by explicit quantitative support. The full manuscript presents visual and comparative results for the eight materials in Section IV, but we will revise the abstract to reference the computed error metrics (such as RMS deviations from the original ER model) and include a new summary table detailing these values along with the literature sources used for parameter selection. Direct full-wave references are limited due to computational cost for extended surfaces at the frequencies of interest; the validation instead relies on matching the established ER model, which has prior measurement validation in the cited literature. We will add explicit citations to those works. revision: yes
Referee: The model formulation asserts that the directive reciprocal reformulation preserves ER physical consistency and reciprocity (S(θ_i, θ_s) = S(θ_s, θ_i)) for arbitrary normalized rms height kσ and incidence angles without extra tuning or corrections. No general proof or exhaustive parameter sweep is referenced, leaving open the possibility that angular weighting or normalization approximations hold only in moderate-roughness regimes.

Authors: Reciprocity is preserved by construction through the symmetric dependence of the scattering coefficient on the incident and scattered angles, without introducing any asymmetric terms or corrections beyond those in the original ER model. This ensures S(θ_i, θ_s) = S(θ_s, θ_i) holds for arbitrary kσ and angles within the model's validity. Numerical verification across the tested materials and a range of roughness parameters and angles is shown in the results section. We will revise Section III to include an explicit short derivation demonstrating the symmetry and add a statement clarifying the tested parameter range to address concerns about moderate-roughness regimes. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces a directive reciprocal reformulation of the Effective Roughness (ER) diffuse scattering model that preserves its structure while claiming an order-of-magnitude computational reduction. The abstract and available description emphasize validation across eight materials with no loss (and slight improvement) in accuracy. No load-bearing derivation steps are exhibited that reduce by construction to fitted inputs, self-definitions, or unverified self-citation chains; the efficiency claim rests on an altered computational path with independent empirical checks rather than tautological reuse of prior parameters or normalizations. The derivation therefore remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The model inherits the physical assumptions of the original effective roughness framework and adds a reciprocity constraint plus a directive lobe shape; no new particles or forces are postulated, but the computational simplification likely relies on an unstated closed-form approximation whose validity range is not specified in the abstract.

axioms (1)

domain assumption The effective roughness scattering kernel can be made reciprocal by a simple algebraic rearrangement without changing its integrated power or angular distribution.
Central to the claim that the new model preserves ER structure while reducing cost.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5719 in / 1329 out tokens · 44391 ms · 2026-05-20T01:13:01.266355+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

fG-RER(ˆks, ˆki) = √cos(ϑs) · exp{−αR[1 − cos(ψ)]} ... FG-RER(αR,ϑi) ≈ KG-RER(αR) √cos(ϑi)
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/DimensionForcing.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Validation across eight materials shows no loss in accuracy

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

26 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

[1]

Sionna RT: Differentiable Ray Tra cing for Radio Propagation Modeling,

J. Hoydis, F. Ait Aoudia, S. Cammerer, M. Nimier-David, N . Binder, G. Marcus, and A. Keller, “Sionna RT: Differentiable Ray Tra cing for Radio Propagation Modeling,” arXiv preprint, Mar. 2023

work page 2023
[2]

Taming vision priors for data efﬁcient mmwave channel p rediction,

“Taming vision priors for data efﬁcient mmwave channel p rediction,” 2025, blind submission under review for ACM MobiSys 2026

work page 2025
[3]

Realizing 5G smart-port use cases with a digital twin,

R. Du, A. Mahmood, and G. Auer, “Realizing 5G smart-port use cases with a digital twin,” Ericsson Technology Review , vol. 2022, no. 13, pp. 2–11, Dec. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9985778/

work page arXiv 2022
[4]

Millimeter Wave Communication: A Comprehensive Survey,

X. Wang, L. Kong, F. Kong, F. Qiu, M. Xia, S. Arnon, and G. Ch en, “Millimeter Wave Communication: A Comprehensive Survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1616–1653, 2018

work page 2018
[5]

Characterizing the Impact of Diffuse Scattering in Urban Millimeter-Wave Deployments,

D. Solomitckii, Q. C. Li, T. Balercia, C. R. C. M. da Silva, S. Talwar, S. Andreev, and Y . Koucheryavy, “Characterizing the Impact of Diffuse Scattering in Urban Millimeter-Wave Deployments,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 432–435, 2016

work page 2016
[6]

A Sur vey of Dense Multipath and Its Impact on Wireless Systems,

S. Jiang, W. Wang, Y . Miao, W. Fan, and A. F. Molisch, “A Sur vey of Dense Multipath and Its Impact on Wireless Systems,” IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation , vol. 3, pp. 435–460, 2022

work page 2022
[7]

Quasi- Deterministic Channel Model Parameters for a Data Center at 60 GHz,

C. Gentile, P . B. Papazian, R. Sun, J. Senic, and J. Wang, “ Quasi- Deterministic Channel Model Parameters for a Data Center at 60 GHz,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 808–812, 2018

work page 2018
[8]

Measurement and Modelling of Scattering From Buildings,

V . Degli-Esposti, F. Fuschini, E. M. Vitucci, and G. Falc iasecca, “Measurement and Modelling of Scattering From Buildings,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 143– 153, 2007

work page 2007
[9]

Measurements and Characterisati on of Surface Scattering at 60 GHz,

A. A. Goulianos, A. L. Freire, T. Barratt, E. Mellios, P . C ain, M. Rum- ney, A. Nix, and M. Beach, “Measurements and Characterisati on of Surface Scattering at 60 GHz,” in 2017 IEEE 86th V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), 2017, pp. 1–5

work page 2017
[10]

On the Inﬂuence of Diff use Scatter- ing on Multiple-Plateau Diffraction Analysis at mm-Wave Fr equencies,

M.-T. Mart´ ınez-Ingl´ es, J.-V . Rodr´ ıguez, J. Pascual-Garc´ ıa, J.-M. Molina- Garcia-Pardo, and L. Juan-Ll´ acer, “On the Inﬂuence of Diff use Scatter- ing on Multiple-Plateau Diffraction Analysis at mm-Wave Fr equencies,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 2130–2135, 2019

work page 2019
[11]

Sixty gigahertz indoo r radio wave propagation prediction method based on full scattering mod el,

J. J¨ urvel¨ uinen and K. Haneda, “Sixty gigahertz indoo r radio wave propagation prediction method based on full scattering mod el,” Radio Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 293–305, 2014

work page 2014
[12]

Comparison of Different Diffuse Scattering Models on Rand om Rough Surface Based on Common Outdoor Materials at 28 GHz Band,

P . Hanpinitsak, Q. Dan, N. Keerativoranan, K. Saito, an d J.-i. Takada, “Comparison of Different Diffuse Scattering Models on Rand om Rough Surface Based on Common Outdoor Materials at 28 GHz Band,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 3365– 3369, 2025

work page 2025
[13]

Tuning Ray Tracing for Mm - wave Coverage Prediction in Outdoor Urban Scenarios,

E. M. Vitucci, V . Degli-Esposti, F. Mani, F. Fuschini, M . Barbiroli, M. Gan, C. Li, J. Zhao, and Z. Zhong, “Tuning Ray Tracing for Mm - wave Coverage Prediction in Outdoor Urban Scenarios,” Radio Science, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 1112–1128, 2019

work page 2019
[14]

Ray Tracing RF Field Prediction: An Unforgiving V alidation,

E. M. Vitucci, V . Degli-Esposti, F. Fuschini, J. S. Lu, M . Barbiroli, J. N. Wu, M. Zoli, J. J. Zhu, and H. L. Bertoni, “Ray Tracing RF Field Prediction: An Unforgiving V alidation,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation , vol. 2015, p. Article ID 184608, 2015

work page 2015
[15]

A Reciprocal Heuristic Model for Diffuse Scattering From Walls and Surfa ces,

E. M. Vitucci, N. Cenni, F. Fuschini, and V . Degli-Espos ti, “A Reciprocal Heuristic Model for Diffuse Scattering From Walls and Surfa ces,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 6072– 6083, 2023

work page 2023
[16]

J. G. V . Bladel, Electromagnetic Fields, 2nd ed., ser. IEEE Press Series on Electromagnetic Wave Theory. Hoboken, NJ: IEEE Press; Jo hn Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007

work page 2007
[17]

V olcano ﬂex,

SIRADEL, “V olcano ﬂex,” Online, 2021, accessed: 2025- 11-11. [On- line]. Available: https://www.siradel.com/telecommunications/volcano/

work page 2021
[18]

Linear State-Space Models and Solutions o f the State Equations,

B. N. Datta, “Linear State-Space Models and Solutions o f the State Equations,” in Numerical Methods for Linear Control Systems: Design and Analysis . Elsevier Academic Press, 2004, ch. 5, pp. 107–157

work page 2004
[19]

Measurement-Based Geometric–S tochastic Model for Path-Speciﬁc Cross-Polarization Discriminatio n,

W. Sloane, S. Berweger, J. Chuang, J. Bang, A. Bodi, J. Wa ng, C. Gentile, and N. Golmie, “Measurement-Based Geometric–S tochastic Model for Path-Speciﬁc Cross-Polarization Discriminatio n,” Jun. 2025, to appear in IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , 2026

work page 2025
[20]

Effect Level Based Parameterization Method for Diffuse Scatterin g Models at Millimeter-Wave Frequencies,

H. Tian, X. Liao, Y . Wang, Y . Shao, J. Zhou, T. Hu, and J. Zh ang, “Effect Level Based Parameterization Method for Diffuse Scatterin g Models at Millimeter-Wave Frequencies,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 93 286–93 293, 2019

work page 2019
[21]

Polarimetric Properties of Diffuse Scattering From Building Walls: Expe rimental Pa- rameterization of a Ray-Tracing Model,

E. M. Vitucci, F. Mani, V . Degli-Esposti, and C. Oestges , “Polarimetric Properties of Diffuse Scattering From Building Walls: Expe rimental Pa- rameterization of a Ray-Tracing Model,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2961–2969, 2012

work page 2012
[22]

Effects of Building Materials and Structures o n Radiowave Propagation above about 100 MHz,

ITU-R, “Effects of Building Materials and Structures o n Radiowave Propagation above about 100 MHz,” International Telecommu nication Union, Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R), Geneva, Switze rland, Rec- ommendation ITU-R P .2040-3 P .2040-3, Aug. 2023, revision 3

work page 2040
[23]

Item level characterization of mm-wave indoor propagatio n,

F. Fuschini, S. H¨ afner, M. Zoli, R. M¨ uller, E. M. Vituc ci, D. Dupleich, M. Barbiroli, J. Luo, E. Schulz, V . Degli-Esposti, and R. S. T hom¨ a, “Item level characterization of mm-wave indoor propagatio n,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking , vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 4, 2016

work page 2016
[24]

4–40 GHz Permittivity Meas urements of Indoor Building Materials,

J. R. Abel and J. W. Wallace, “4–40 GHz Permittivity Meas urements of Indoor Building Materials,” in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Mee ting (APS/URSI), Atlanta, GA, USA, Jul. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10112168

work page arXiv 2019
[25]

Estimate of local average power of a mobile radi o signal,

W. Lee, “Estimate of local average power of a mobile radi o signal,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 1985

work page 1985
[26]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th ed., D. Zwillinger and V . H. Moll, Eds. Academic Press, 2014

work page 2014

[1] [1]

Sionna RT: Differentiable Ray Tra cing for Radio Propagation Modeling,

J. Hoydis, F. Ait Aoudia, S. Cammerer, M. Nimier-David, N . Binder, G. Marcus, and A. Keller, “Sionna RT: Differentiable Ray Tra cing for Radio Propagation Modeling,” arXiv preprint, Mar. 2023

work page 2023

[2] [2]

Taming vision priors for data efﬁcient mmwave channel p rediction,

“Taming vision priors for data efﬁcient mmwave channel p rediction,” 2025, blind submission under review for ACM MobiSys 2026

work page 2025

[3] [3]

Realizing 5G smart-port use cases with a digital twin,

R. Du, A. Mahmood, and G. Auer, “Realizing 5G smart-port use cases with a digital twin,” Ericsson Technology Review , vol. 2022, no. 13, pp. 2–11, Dec. 2022. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9985778/

work page arXiv 2022

[4] [4]

Millimeter Wave Communication: A Comprehensive Survey,

X. Wang, L. Kong, F. Kong, F. Qiu, M. Xia, S. Arnon, and G. Ch en, “Millimeter Wave Communication: A Comprehensive Survey,” IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials , vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 1616–1653, 2018

work page 2018

[5] [5]

Characterizing the Impact of Diffuse Scattering in Urban Millimeter-Wave Deployments,

D. Solomitckii, Q. C. Li, T. Balercia, C. R. C. M. da Silva, S. Talwar, S. Andreev, and Y . Koucheryavy, “Characterizing the Impact of Diffuse Scattering in Urban Millimeter-Wave Deployments,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters , vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 432–435, 2016

work page 2016

[6] [6]

A Sur vey of Dense Multipath and Its Impact on Wireless Systems,

S. Jiang, W. Wang, Y . Miao, W. Fan, and A. F. Molisch, “A Sur vey of Dense Multipath and Its Impact on Wireless Systems,” IEEE Open Journal of Antennas and Propagation , vol. 3, pp. 435–460, 2022

work page 2022

[7] [7]

Quasi- Deterministic Channel Model Parameters for a Data Center at 60 GHz,

C. Gentile, P . B. Papazian, R. Sun, J. Senic, and J. Wang, “ Quasi- Deterministic Channel Model Parameters for a Data Center at 60 GHz,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , vol. 17, no. 5, pp. 808–812, 2018

work page 2018

[8] [8]

Measurement and Modelling of Scattering From Buildings,

V . Degli-Esposti, F. Fuschini, E. M. Vitucci, and G. Falc iasecca, “Measurement and Modelling of Scattering From Buildings,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 55, no. 1, pp. 143– 153, 2007

work page 2007

[9] [9]

Measurements and Characterisati on of Surface Scattering at 60 GHz,

A. A. Goulianos, A. L. Freire, T. Barratt, E. Mellios, P . C ain, M. Rum- ney, A. Nix, and M. Beach, “Measurements and Characterisati on of Surface Scattering at 60 GHz,” in 2017 IEEE 86th V ehicular Technology Conference (VTC-Fall), 2017, pp. 1–5

work page 2017

[10] [10]

On the Inﬂuence of Diff use Scatter- ing on Multiple-Plateau Diffraction Analysis at mm-Wave Fr equencies,

M.-T. Mart´ ınez-Ingl´ es, J.-V . Rodr´ ıguez, J. Pascual-Garc´ ıa, J.-M. Molina- Garcia-Pardo, and L. Juan-Ll´ acer, “On the Inﬂuence of Diff use Scatter- ing on Multiple-Plateau Diffraction Analysis at mm-Wave Fr equencies,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 67, no. 4, pp. 2130–2135, 2019

work page 2019

[11] [11]

Sixty gigahertz indoo r radio wave propagation prediction method based on full scattering mod el,

J. J¨ urvel¨ uinen and K. Haneda, “Sixty gigahertz indoo r radio wave propagation prediction method based on full scattering mod el,” Radio Science, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 293–305, 2014

work page 2014

[12] [12]

Comparison of Different Diffuse Scattering Models on Rand om Rough Surface Based on Common Outdoor Materials at 28 GHz Band,

P . Hanpinitsak, Q. Dan, N. Keerativoranan, K. Saito, an d J.-i. Takada, “Comparison of Different Diffuse Scattering Models on Rand om Rough Surface Based on Common Outdoor Materials at 28 GHz Band,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters , vol. 24, no. 10, pp. 3365– 3369, 2025

work page 2025

[13] [13]

Tuning Ray Tracing for Mm - wave Coverage Prediction in Outdoor Urban Scenarios,

E. M. Vitucci, V . Degli-Esposti, F. Mani, F. Fuschini, M . Barbiroli, M. Gan, C. Li, J. Zhao, and Z. Zhong, “Tuning Ray Tracing for Mm - wave Coverage Prediction in Outdoor Urban Scenarios,” Radio Science, vol. 54, no. 11, pp. 1112–1128, 2019

work page 2019

[14] [14]

Ray Tracing RF Field Prediction: An Unforgiving V alidation,

E. M. Vitucci, V . Degli-Esposti, F. Fuschini, J. S. Lu, M . Barbiroli, J. N. Wu, M. Zoli, J. J. Zhu, and H. L. Bertoni, “Ray Tracing RF Field Prediction: An Unforgiving V alidation,” International Journal of Antennas and Propagation , vol. 2015, p. Article ID 184608, 2015

work page 2015

[15] [15]

A Reciprocal Heuristic Model for Diffuse Scattering From Walls and Surfa ces,

E. M. Vitucci, N. Cenni, F. Fuschini, and V . Degli-Espos ti, “A Reciprocal Heuristic Model for Diffuse Scattering From Walls and Surfa ces,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , vol. 71, no. 7, pp. 6072– 6083, 2023

work page 2023

[16] [16]

J. G. V . Bladel, Electromagnetic Fields, 2nd ed., ser. IEEE Press Series on Electromagnetic Wave Theory. Hoboken, NJ: IEEE Press; Jo hn Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2007

work page 2007

[17] [17]

V olcano ﬂex,

SIRADEL, “V olcano ﬂex,” Online, 2021, accessed: 2025- 11-11. [On- line]. Available: https://www.siradel.com/telecommunications/volcano/

work page 2021

[18] [18]

Linear State-Space Models and Solutions o f the State Equations,

B. N. Datta, “Linear State-Space Models and Solutions o f the State Equations,” in Numerical Methods for Linear Control Systems: Design and Analysis . Elsevier Academic Press, 2004, ch. 5, pp. 107–157

work page 2004

[19] [19]

Measurement-Based Geometric–S tochastic Model for Path-Speciﬁc Cross-Polarization Discriminatio n,

W. Sloane, S. Berweger, J. Chuang, J. Bang, A. Bodi, J. Wa ng, C. Gentile, and N. Golmie, “Measurement-Based Geometric–S tochastic Model for Path-Speciﬁc Cross-Polarization Discriminatio n,” Jun. 2025, to appear in IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation , 2026

work page 2025

[20] [20]

Effect Level Based Parameterization Method for Diffuse Scatterin g Models at Millimeter-Wave Frequencies,

H. Tian, X. Liao, Y . Wang, Y . Shao, J. Zhou, T. Hu, and J. Zh ang, “Effect Level Based Parameterization Method for Diffuse Scatterin g Models at Millimeter-Wave Frequencies,” IEEE Access , vol. 7, pp. 93 286–93 293, 2019

work page 2019

[21] [21]

Polarimetric Properties of Diffuse Scattering From Building Walls: Expe rimental Pa- rameterization of a Ray-Tracing Model,

E. M. Vitucci, F. Mani, V . Degli-Esposti, and C. Oestges , “Polarimetric Properties of Diffuse Scattering From Building Walls: Expe rimental Pa- rameterization of a Ray-Tracing Model,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 60, no. 6, pp. 2961–2969, 2012

work page 2012

[22] [22]

Effects of Building Materials and Structures o n Radiowave Propagation above about 100 MHz,

ITU-R, “Effects of Building Materials and Structures o n Radiowave Propagation above about 100 MHz,” International Telecommu nication Union, Radiocommunication Sector (ITU-R), Geneva, Switze rland, Rec- ommendation ITU-R P .2040-3 P .2040-3, Aug. 2023, revision 3

work page 2040

[23] [23]

Item level characterization of mm-wave indoor propagatio n,

F. Fuschini, S. H¨ afner, M. Zoli, R. M¨ uller, E. M. Vituc ci, D. Dupleich, M. Barbiroli, J. Luo, E. Schulz, V . Degli-Esposti, and R. S. T hom¨ a, “Item level characterization of mm-wave indoor propagatio n,” EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking , vol. 2016, no. 1, p. 4, 2016

work page 2016

[24] [24]

4–40 GHz Permittivity Meas urements of Indoor Building Materials,

J. R. Abel and J. W. Wallace, “4–40 GHz Permittivity Meas urements of Indoor Building Materials,” in 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation and USNC-URSI Radio Science Mee ting (APS/URSI), Atlanta, GA, USA, Jul. 2019. [Online]. Available: https://par.nsf.gov/servlets/purl/10112168

work page arXiv 2019

[25] [25]

Estimate of local average power of a mobile radi o signal,

W. Lee, “Estimate of local average power of a mobile radi o signal,” IEEE Transactions on V ehicular Technology, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 22–27, 1985

work page 1985

[26] [26]

I. S. Gradshteyn and I. M. Ryzhik, Table of Integrals, Series, and Products, 8th ed., D. Zwillinger and V . H. Moll, Eds. Academic Press, 2014

work page 2014