pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.18690 · v1 · pith:VS6EAYRMnew · submitted 2026-05-18 · ⚛️ physics.optics

From order to chaos in a chip-scale Kerr parametric oscillator

Luca O. Trinch\~ao , Juan Diego Mazo-V\'asquez , Miguel Nienstedt , Luiz Peres , Julius T. Gohsrich , Eduardo S. Gon\c{c}alves , Alekhya Ghosh , Arghadeep Pal
show 8 more authors
La\'is Fujii dos Santos Paulo F. Jarschel Thiago P. Mayer Alegre Nathalia B. Tomazio Flore K. Kunst Pascal Del'Haye Lewis Hill Gustavo S. Wiederhecker
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 08:14 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.optics
keywords kerr nonlinearitydegenerate optical parametric oscillatorhopf bifurcationperiod-doublingchaosmicroring resonatorsilicon nitrideintegrated photonics
0
0 comments X

The pith

Kerr parametric oscillators on a chip move from stable states to MHz oscillations and then to chaos.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper establishes that degenerate optical parametric oscillators driven by Kerr nonlinearity in a silicon nitride microring support a wider set of behaviors than the binary stable states previously used for random number generation and Ising machines. Experiments identify Hopf bifurcations that produce self-sustained oscillations at megahertz frequencies, with the oscillations turned on and off by simple changes in pump power and frequency detuning. At higher pump levels, period-doubling sequences appear and numerical models indicate these sequences lead to chaotic dynamics. A sympathetic reader would care because the added dynamical regimes suggest routes to richer signal processing or computing functions inside the same compact photonic hardware.

Core claim

Using a silicon nitride microring resonator, DOPOs based on the Kerr nonlinearity undergo Hopf bifurcations that trigger self-sustained oscillations at MHz frequencies; adjusting pump detuning and power provides turnkey control that switches the system between the two stable binary states and periodic limit cycles, while period-doubling bifurcations observed in experiment precede a cascading instability that culminates in chaos at elevated pump powers.

What carries the argument

The Kerr nonlinearity inside the microring resonator, which produces the parametric gain and drives the sequence of Hopf and period-doubling bifurcations as pump parameters change.

If this is right

  • Pump power and detuning give direct control over transitions between stationary binary states and self-sustained oscillations.
  • Period-doubling bifurcations act as a reliable precursor to chaotic operation in these devices.
  • A practical framework now exists for deliberately inducing or avoiding nonlinear instabilities in chip-scale parametric oscillators.
  • The same hardware can in principle support both binary logic operations and dynamical regimes for optical computing.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • These controllable oscillations might be combined with existing soliton or comb regimes in the same resonator to create hybrid photonic processors.
  • Similar bifurcation sequences could appear in other Kerr-driven integrated devices such as microresonator frequency combs when pump conditions are varied.
  • Mapping the full bifurcation diagram in additional resonator geometries would clarify how resonator size and quality factor shift the onset of chaos.

Load-bearing premise

The observed megahertz oscillations and period-doubling arise purely from the Kerr nonlinearity and pump detuning without important contributions from thermal shifts or higher-order dispersion.

What would settle it

An experiment that suppresses thermal effects through active stabilization or pulsed pumping and still reproduces the same MHz frequency and period-doubling sequence would support the claim; failure to observe the sequence once thermal contributions are removed would challenge it.

read the original abstract

Integrated photonics has enabled a wide class of chip-scale light sources and quantum technologies. Within this field, microresonator-based degenerate optical parametric oscillators (DOPOs) have gained prominence. Above a critical power threshold, these systems undergo spontaneous symmetry breaking to settle into one of two stable, {\pi}-phase-shifted states -- a mechanism successfully used for quantum random number generation and photonic Ising machines. Here, we show that DOPOs based on the Kerr nonlinearity host a significantly broader range of nonlinear dynamics than previously explored. Using a silicon nitride microring resonator, we experimentally identify Hopf bifurcations that trigger a transition from stationary operation to self-sustained oscillations at MHz frequencies. By adjusting pump detunings and powers, we achieve turnkey control over these oscillatory regimes, navigating the system between stable binary states and periodic limit cycles. Furthermore, we report the experimental observation of period-doubling bifurcations, which numerical simulations reveal as the precursor to a cascading instability culminating in chaos at elevated pump powers. Our results establish a framework for controlling nonlinear instabilities in chip-scale parametric oscillators, with applications in programmable photonic hardware and dynamical optical computing.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports that silicon-nitride microring degenerate optical parametric oscillators (DOPOs) driven by the Kerr nonlinearity exhibit a wider range of dynamics than previously explored. Using pump detuning and power tuning, the authors experimentally identify Hopf bifurcations that produce self-sustained MHz oscillations, navigate between stable binary states and limit cycles, and observe period-doubling bifurcations that numerical simulations link to a route to chaos at higher pump powers.

Significance. If the observed MHz oscillations and period-doubling cascade are shown to originate strictly from the Kerr-driven Lugiato-Lefever dynamics, the work would establish a practical framework for controlling nonlinear instabilities in chip-scale parametric oscillators. The experimental demonstration of turnkey access to oscillatory regimes and the supporting numerical modeling of the period-doubling route constitute clear strengths that could inform programmable photonic hardware and dynamical optical computing.

major comments (2)
  1. [Experimental identification and results] The central claim that the MHz self-sustained oscillations and subsequent period-doubling arise purely from the Kerr nonlinearity under pump detuning is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit experimental checks (power-dependent thermal time-constant measurements or dispersion-engineered control devices) to exclude thermo-optic contributions that can shift effective detuning on comparable timescales in SiN microrings.
  2. [Numerical simulations and discussion] The abstract and supporting numerical section state that period-doubling precedes a cascading instability to chaos at elevated pump powers, but no quantitative comparison (bifurcation thresholds, Lyapunov exponents, or direct overlay of simulated and measured spectra) is reported to confirm that the experimental observations match the pure Kerr model rather than a hybrid thermal-Kerr scenario.
minor comments (2)
  1. Figure captions should explicitly state the pump power and detuning values used for each trace to allow readers to map the data directly onto the claimed bifurcation sequence.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a short paragraph in the methods or supplementary information listing the precise criteria used to distinguish Hopf from other possible oscillatory mechanisms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and have revised the manuscript to incorporate clarifications and additional comparisons that strengthen the evidence for Kerr-driven dynamics.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The central claim that the MHz self-sustained oscillations and subsequent period-doubling arise purely from the Kerr nonlinearity under pump detuning is load-bearing, yet the manuscript provides no explicit experimental checks (power-dependent thermal time-constant measurements or dispersion-engineered control devices) to exclude thermo-optic contributions that can shift effective detuning on comparable timescales in SiN microrings.

    Authors: We agree that explicitly ruling out thermo-optic contributions is important for the central claim. The observed MHz oscillations are much faster than typical thermal relaxation rates in SiN microrings (kHz range), providing a natural timescale separation that favors a Kerr origin. To address the referee's concern, we have added a new discussion paragraph citing literature on thermal dynamics in similar devices and included power-dependent measurements of oscillation frequency that scale consistently with Kerr nonlinearity. We note that fabricating dedicated dispersion-engineered control devices lies outside the current scope, but the added analysis supports the claim without them. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The abstract and supporting numerical section state that period-doubling precedes a cascading instability to chaos at elevated pump powers, but no quantitative comparison (bifurcation thresholds, Lyapunov exponents, or direct overlay of simulated and measured spectra) is reported to confirm that the experimental observations match the pure Kerr model rather than a hybrid thermal-Kerr scenario.

    Authors: We concur that quantitative comparisons would better confirm consistency with the pure Kerr Lugiato-Lefever model. In the revised manuscript we have added direct overlays of experimental and simulated spectra near the period-doubling points, tabulated bifurcation thresholds extracted from both data and simulations, and Lyapunov exponent calculations from the numerical model that become positive in the high-power regime. These additions are now presented in the numerical simulations section and support that the observed route aligns with Kerr-driven dynamics. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Experimental observations of Kerr DOPO dynamics are independent of fitted inputs

full rationale

The paper is an experimental study reporting direct observations of Hopf bifurcations to MHz self-sustained oscillations and period-doubling cascades to chaos in a silicon nitride microring DOPO. Numerical modeling is used only for interpretive comparison against the standard Lugiato-Lefever equation under pump detuning; no central result is obtained by fitting a parameter to a data subset and then relabeling a closely related quantity as a prediction. No self-definitional steps, load-bearing self-citations, or ansatz smuggling appear in the derivation chain. The work remains self-contained against external benchmarks because the reported bifurcations are identified from measured spectra and time traces rather than from quantities defined by construction from the same dataset.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard model of Kerr-driven parametric oscillation in microresonators plus experimental tuning of pump parameters; no new entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • pump detuning and power
    Experimentally adjusted to navigate between stable states, oscillatory regimes, and chaotic regimes; values are not reported as fitted but as control parameters.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Dynamics governed by known Kerr nonlinearity equations for degenerate optical parametric oscillators
    Invoked to interpret observed MHz oscillations as Hopf bifurcations and period-doubling as route to chaos.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5820 in / 1276 out tokens · 30023 ms · 2026-05-20T08:14:06.571432+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

75 extracted references · 75 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    K. J. Vahala, Nature424, 839 (2003)

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    T. J. Kippenberg, A. L. Gaeta, M. Lipson, and M. L. Gorodetsky, Science361, eaan8083 (2018)

    work page 2018

  3. [3]

    C. C. Rodrigues, N. J. Schilder, R. O. Zurita, L. S. Mag- alh˜ aes, A. Shams-Ansari, F. J. Dos Santos, O. M. Paiano, T. P. Alegre, M. Lonˇ car, and G. S. Wiederhecker, Phys. Rev. Lett.134, 113601 (2025)

    work page 2025

  4. [4]

    Rehan, N

    M. Rehan, N. B. Tomazio, A. R. Cadore, D. F. Londono- Giraldo, D. A. Matos, G. S. Wiederhecker, and C. J. de Matos, arXiv:2501.10575 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  5. [5]

    Ghosh, A

    A. Ghosh, A. Pal, H. Yan, T. Bi, L. O. Trinch˜ ao, Q. Zhou, G. S. Wiederhecker, S. Zhang, and P. Del’Haye, arXiv:2603.03255 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  6. [6]

    N. L. B. Sayson, T. Bi, V. Ng, H. Pham, L. S. Trainor, H. G. Schwefel, S. Coen, M. Erkintalo, and S. G. Mur- doch, Nat. Photon.13, 701 (2019)

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    Del’Haye, A

    P. Del’Haye, A. Schliesser, O. Arcizet, T. Wilken, R. Holzwarth, and T. J. Kippenberg, Nature450, 1214 (2007)

    work page 2007

  8. [8]

    Y. Sun, J. Stone, X. Lu, F. Zhou, J. Song, Z. Shi, and K. Srinivasan, Light Sci. Appl.13, 201 (2024)

    work page 2024

  9. [9]

    J. H. Soares, L. Fujii dos Santos, F. G. Santos, M. Inga, Y. A. Espinel, G. S. Wiederhecker, and T. P. M. Alegre, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B40, 1407 (2023)

    work page 2023

  10. [10]

    Aghaee Rad, T

    H. Aghaee Rad, T. Ainsworth, R. Alexander, B. Al- tieri, M. Askarani, R. Baby, L. Banchi, B. Baragiola, J. Bourassa, R. Chadwick,et al., Nature638, 912 (2025)

    work page 2025

  11. [11]

    Y. Zhao, Y. Okawachi, J. K. Jang, X. Ji, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Phys. Rev. Lett.124, 193601 (2020)

    work page 2020

  12. [12]

    Zhang, M

    Y. Zhang, M. Menotti, K. Tan, V. Vaidya, D. Mahler, L. Helt, L. Zatti, M. Liscidini, B. Morrison, and Z. Ver- non, Nat. Commun.12, 2233 (2021)

    work page 2021

  13. [13]

    A. E. Ulanov, B. Ruhnke, T. Wildi, and T. Herr, Nat. Commun.16(2025), 10.1038/s41467-025-66703-x

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-025-66703-x 2025

  14. [14]

    S. Choi, Y. Salamin, C. Roques-Carmes, J. Sloan, M. Horodynski, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Nat. Commun.16, 7576 (2025)

    work page 2025

  15. [15]

    X. Lu, R. M. Gray, J. Stone, S. Zhou, N. Englebert, A. Marandi, and K. Srinivasan, Optica13, 11 (2025)

    work page 2025

  16. [16]

    L. O. Trinch˜ ao, L. Peres, E. S. Gon¸ calves, M. Nienstedt, L. F. d. Santos, P. F. Jarschel, T. P. M. Alegre, N. B. Tomazio, and G. S. Wiederhecker, arXiv:2602.11697 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  17. [17]

    Fujii, M

    L. Fujii, M. Inga, J. H. Soares, Y. A. Espinel, T. Mayer Alegre, and G. S. Wiederhecker, Opt. Lett. 45, 3232 (2020)

    work page 2020

  18. [18]

    M. Inga, L. Fujii, J. M. C. da Silva Filho, J. H. Quintino Palhares, A. S. Ferlauto, F. C. Marques, T. P. Mayer Alegre, and G. Wiederhecker, APL Photonics5 (2020), 10.1063/5.0028839

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0028839 2020

  19. [19]

    F. Lei, Z. Ye, K. Twayana, Y. Gao, M. Girardi, ´O. B. Helgason, P. Zhao, and V. Torres-Company, Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 093801 (2023)

    work page 2023

  20. [20]

    A. Pal, A. Ghosh, S. Zhang, T. Bi, M. Kheyri, H. Yan, Y. Zhang, and P. Del’Haye, arXiv:2505.01352 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  21. [21]

    A. Li, M. Bahri, R. M. Gray, S. Choi, S. Hoseinkhani, A. Srivastava, A. Marandi, and H. Fattahi, APL Pho- tonics9, 100808 (2024)

    work page 2024

  22. [23]

    Marandi, Z

    A. Marandi, Z. Wang, K. Takata, R. L. Byer, and Y. Ya- mamoto, Nat. Photon.8, 937 (2014)

    work page 2014

  23. [24]

    A. Roy, S. Jahani, C. Langrock, M. Fejer, and A. Marandi, Nat. Commun.12, 835 (2021)

    work page 2021

  24. [25]

    A. Roy, R. Nehra, C. Langrock, M. Fejer, and A. Marandi, Nat. Phys.19, 427 (2023)

    work page 2023

  25. [26]

    F. Yang, J. Xie, Y. Zhou, Y. Wang, C. He, Y. Guo, and H. X. Tang, arXiv:2505.00936 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  26. [27]

    Englebert, R

    N. Englebert, R. M. Gray, L. Ledezma, R. Sekine, T. Zacharias, R. Ramesh, B. K. Gutierrez, P. Parra- Rivas, and A. Marandi, arXiv:2511.01856 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  27. [28]

    A. W. Bruch, X. Liu, J. B. Surya, C.-L. Zou, and H. X. Tang, Optica6, 1361 (2019)

    work page 2019

  28. [30]

    Okawachi, M

    Y. Okawachi, M. Yu, K. Luke, D. O. Carvalho, S. Ramelow, A. Farsi, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Opt. Lett.40, 5267 (2015)

    work page 2015

  29. [31]

    Okawachi, M

    Y. Okawachi, M. Yu, J. K. Jang, X. Ji, Y. Zhao, B. Y. Kim, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Nat. Commun.11, 4119 (2020)

    work page 2020

  30. [32]

    Okawachi, B

    Y. Okawachi, B. Y. Kim, Y. Zhao, X. Ji, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Optica8, 1458 (2021). 11

    work page 2021

  31. [33]

    Okawachi, M

    Y. Okawachi, M. Yu, K. Luke, D. O. Carvalho, M. Lip- son, and A. L. Gaeta, Opt. Lett.41, 4194 (2016)

    work page 2016

  32. [34]

    A. K. Vorobyev, N. A. Kapridov, T. R. Yunusov, D. V. Morozov, A. N. Danilin, A. D. Ivanov, A. E. Shitikov, V. E. Lobanov, I. A. Bilenko, and D. A. Chermoshentsev, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 054054 (2025)

    work page 2025

  33. [35]

    N. S. Tatarinova, A. E. Shitikov, G. V. Grechko, A. K. Vorobyev, A. V. Masalov, I. A. Bilenko, D. A. Cher- moshentsev, and V. E. Lobanov, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 024010 (2025)

    work page 2025

  34. [36]

    Zhang, T

    S. Zhang, T. Bi, I. Harder, O. Ohletz, F. Gannott, A. Gu- mann, E. Butzen, Y. Zhang, and P. Del’Haye, Laser Photonics Rev.18, 2300642 (2024)

    work page 2024

  35. [37]

    T. Bi, S. Zhang, E. Bostan, D. Liu, A. Paul, O. Ohletz, I. Harder, Y. Zhang, A. Ghosh, A. Alabbadi,et al., arXiv:2505.13383 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025

  36. [38]

    Y. Shen, S. K. Sridhar, G. Moille, F. A. Shaikh, K. Srini- vasan, and A. Dutt, inCLEO: Science and Innovations (Optica Publishing Group, 2024) pp. SW4F–2

    work page 2024

  37. [39]

    X. Ren, R. Kopparapu, T. S. Karnik, C.-H. Lee, K. Kwon, C. Cheung, Y. Yu, S.-Y. Ma, B.-H. Wu, R. Yin, et al., arXiv:2602.22693 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  38. [40]

    Bouasria, D

    Y. Bouasria, D. Chatterjee, W. Xie, I. Fsaifes, F. Gold- farb, Y. Hassouni, and F. Bretenaker, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B37, 2745 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [41]

    Inoue, J

    K. Inoue, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B36, 1436 (2019)

    work page 2019

  40. [42]

    Chatterjee, Y

    D. Chatterjee, Y. Bouasria, F. Goldfarb, and F. Brete- naker, J. Opt. Soc. Am. B38, 1112 (2021)

    work page 2021

  41. [43]

    Del Bino, J

    L. Del Bino, J. M. Silver, S. L. Stebbings, and P. Del’Haye, Sci. Rep.7, 43142 (2017)

    work page 2017

  42. [44]

    Garbin, J

    B. Garbin, J. Fatome, G.-L. Oppo, M. Erkintalo, S. G. Murdoch, and S. Coen, Phys. Rev. Research2, 023244 (2020)

    work page 2020

  43. [45]

    L. O. Trinch˜ ao, A. Ghosh, A. Pal, H. Yan, T. Bi, S. Zhang, N. B. Tomazio, F. K. Kunst, L. Hill, G. S. Wiederhecker, and P. Del’Haye, arXiv:2601.00792 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  44. [47]

    Z. Wang, A. Marandi, K. Wen, R. L. Byer, and Y. Ya- mamoto, Phys. Rev. A88, 063853 (2013)

    work page 2013

  45. [48]

    Inagaki, K

    T. Inagaki, K. Inaba, R. Hamerly, K. Inoue, Y. Ya- mamoto, and H. Takesue, Nat. Photon.10, 415 (2016)

    work page 2016

  46. [49]

    A. N. Danilin, T. R. Yunusov, E. S. Vahnitskaya, A. P. Dushanin, S. Huang, Z. Shang, J. Liu, A. V. Masalov, D. A. Chermoshentsev, and I. A. Bilenko, arXiv:2601.07378 (2026)

    work page arXiv 2026

  47. [50]

    Parra-Rivas, L

    P. Parra-Rivas, L. Gelens, T. Hansson, S. Wabnitz, and F. Leo, Opt. Lett.44, 2004 (2019)

    work page 2004

  48. [51]

    L. O. Trinch˜ ao, L. Peres, E. S. Gon¸ calves, M. Nienst- edt, L. F. d. Santos, P. F. Jarschel, T. P. Alegre, N. B. Tomazio, and G. S. Wiederhecker, Opt. Lett.51, 1387 (2026)

    work page 2026

  49. [52]

    M. T. Woodley, L. Hill, L. Del Bino, G.-L. Oppo, and P. Del’Haye, Phys. Rev. Lett.126, 043901 (2021)

    work page 2021

  50. [53]

    See Supplementary Information for further details

    work page

  51. [54]

    Gao, Q.-F

    M. Gao, Q.-F. Yang, Q.-X. Ji, H. Wang, L. Wu, B. Shen, J. Liu, G. Huang, L. Chang, W. Xie,et al., Nat. Com- mun.13, 3323 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [55]

    Jiang and L

    X. Jiang and L. Yang, Light Sci. Appl.9, 24 (2020)

    work page 2020

  53. [56]

    Carmon, M

    T. Carmon, M. Cross, and K. J. Vahala, Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 167203 (2007)

    work page 2007

  54. [57]

    Bakemeier, A

    L. Bakemeier, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, Phys. Rev. Lett.114, 013601 (2015)

    work page 2015

  55. [58]

    Navarro-Urrios, N

    D. Navarro-Urrios, N. E. Capuj, M. F. Colombano, P. D. Garc´ ıa, M. Sledzinska, F. Alzina, A. Griol, A. Mart´ ınez, and C. M. Sotomayor-Torres, Nat. Commun.8, 14965 (2017)

    work page 2017

  56. [59]

    M. T. Woodley, J. M. Silver, L. Hill, F. Copie, L. Del Bino, S. Zhang, G.-L. Oppo, and P. Del’Haye, Phys. Rev. A98, 053863 (2018)

    work page 2018

  57. [60]

    Hill, G.-L

    L. Hill, G.-L. Oppo, M. T. Woodley, and P. Del’Haye, Physical Review A101, 013823 (2020)

    work page 2020

  58. [61]

    Moille, M

    G. Moille, M. Leonhardt, D. Paligora, N. Englebert, F. Leo, J. Fatome, K. Srinivasan, and M. Erkintalo, Nature Photonics18, 617 (2024)

    work page 2024

  59. [62]

    Computing with the complex nonlinear dynamics of an optomechanical oscillator

    S. Edelstein, M. Menendez, B. Lu, B. V. Lahijani, C. Lopez, M. C. Soriano, S. Stobbe, and P. D. Garcia, arXiv:2605.01792 (2026)

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  60. [63]

    Xiang, A

    J. Xiang, A. Torchy, X. Guo, and Y. Su, J. Lightwave Technol.38, 4019 (2020)

    work page 2020

  61. [64]

    Biasi, A

    S. Biasi, A. Lugnan, D. Micheli, and L. Pavesi, Commun. Phys.7, 380 (2024)

    work page 2024

  62. [65]

    Del Bino, N

    L. Del Bino, N. Moroney, and P. Del’Haye, Optics Ex- press29, 2193 (2021)

    work page 2021

  63. [68]

    L. Hill, J. T. Gohsrich, A. Ghosh, J. Fauman, P. Del’Haye, and F. K. Kunst, Commun. Phys.9(2026), 10.1038/s42005-026-02491-0. Supplementary Information for: From order to chaos in a chip-scale Kerr parametric oscillator Luca O. Trinch˜ ao,1, 2,∗ Juan Diego Mazo-V´ asquez,2, 3,∗ Miguel Nienstedt, 1, 2 Luiz Peres, 1 Julius T. Gohsrich, 2, 3 Eduardo S. Gon¸ ...

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005-026-02491-0 2026

  64. [69]

    Marandi, N

    A. Marandi, N. C. Leindecker, K. L. Vodopyanov, and R. L. Byer, Opt. Express.20, 19322 (2012)

    work page 2012

  65. [70]

    Okawachi, M

    Y. Okawachi, M. Yu, K. Luke, D. O. Carvalho, M. Lipson, and A. L. Gaeta, Opt. Lett.41, 4194 (2016)

    work page 2016

  66. [71]

    Hansson and S

    T. Hansson and S. Wabnitz, Phys. Rev. A90, 013811 (2014)

    work page 2014

  67. [72]

    A. Roy, R. Haldar, and S. K. Varshney, J. Light. Technol.36, 2422 (2018)

    work page 2018

  68. [73]

    Strang,Introduction to Linear Algebra, 5th ed

    G. Strang,Introduction to Linear Algebra, 5th ed. (CUP, 2021)

    work page 2021

  69. [74]

    M. T. M. Woodley, J. M. Silver, L. Hill, F. Copie, L. Del Bino, S. Zhang, G.-L. Oppo, and P. Del’Haye, Phys. Rev. A. 98, 053863 (2018)

    work page 2018

  70. [75]

    R. D. D. Bitha, A. Giraldo, N. G. R. Broderick, and B. Krauskopf, Phys. Rev. E.108, 064204 (2023)

    work page 2023

  71. [76]

    L. Hill, J. T. Gohsrich, A. Ghosh, J. Fauman, P. Del’Haye, and F. K. Kunst, Commun. Phys.9(2026), 10.1038/s42005- 026-02491-0

    work page doi:10.1038/s42005- 2026

  72. [77]

    He and K

    M. He and K. Jamshidi, Phys. Rev. Appl.20, 054036 (2023)

    work page 2023

  73. [78]

    N. S. Tatarinova, A. E. Shitikov, G. V. Grechko, A. K. Vorobyev, A. V. Masalov, I. A. Bilenko, D. A. Chermoshentsev, and V. E. Lobanov, Phys. Rev. Appl.24, 024010 (2025)

    work page 2025

  74. [79]

    N. B. Tomazio, L. O. Trinch˜ ao, E. S. Goncalves, L. F. dos Santos, F. G. Santos, P. F. Jarschel, T. P. M. Alegre, and G. S. Wiederhecker, ACS Photonics12, 227 (2024)

    work page 2024

  75. [80]

    J. D. Mazo-Vasquez, J. T. Gohsrich, F. K. Kunst, and L. Hill, arXiv:2512.14168 (2025)

    work page arXiv 2025