AMPM II. A Lunar-Mass Primordial Black Hole Microlensing Candidate in the Milky Way Halo
Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 04:31 UTC · model grok-4.3
The pith
An hour-long microlensing event is five orders of magnitude more likely to be a lunar-mass primordial black hole in the Milky Way halo than a star.
A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.
Core claim
The authors detect an hour-long microlensing event and conclude from an optical depth probabilistic analysis that the lens, called Phoebe, is 5 orders of magnitude more likely to belong to the Milky Way's dark matter halo than to the stellar content of the Milky Way and LMC. Bayesian modelling interprets Phoebe as a primordial black hole with mass 0.032^{+0.227}_{-0.027} M_⊕.
What carries the argument
Optical depth probabilistic analysis combined with Bayesian population modeling of the microlensing light curve and event statistics to assign the lens to the halo population.
If this is right
- Phoebe indicates that lunar-mass primordial black holes may be present in the Milky Way halo as part of the dark matter.
- The result opens a potential window onto inflation through the abundance of PBHs at this mass scale.
- High-cadence microlensing surveys can now target more events in the minutes-to-hours regime.
- The inferred mass places Phoebe among the lowest-mass microlensing signals recorded.
Where Pith is reading between the lines
- Confirmation of a steady rate of such events would support a substantial PBH contribution to halo dark matter.
- Repeating the survey in other directions could map whether these objects follow the expected halo density profile.
- The mass range invites cross-checks with other PBH constraints, such as those from gravitational-wave observations of mergers.
Load-bearing premise
The optical depth probabilistic analysis and Bayesian population modeling correctly assign the event to the dark-matter halo rather than to stellar populations or other contaminants, with no significant unaccounted systematics in event selection or light-curve fitting.
What would settle it
Detection of many additional events with similar timescales whose rate and sky distribution are inconsistent with the expected halo PBH population, or direct evidence that the light curve arises from a stellar lens.
Figures
read the original abstract
Primordial Black Holes (PBH) are hypothesised to form during inflation and have long been considered a candidate for compact dark matter. Gravitational microlensing is known as a productive method for exoplanet discovery and characterisation, but also provides an experimental avenue to constrain the PBH abundance in the mass regime from $\sim 10^{-11}\ M_{\odot}$ to $\sim 10^5\ M_{\odot}$. We performed a high-cadence, optical microlensing survey with DECam over five nights towards the Large Magellanic Cloud, sensitive to microlensing timescales from minutes to days. Here, we report the discovery of an hour-long microlensing event. An optical depth probabilistic analysis indicates that the lensing object, which we refer to as Phoebe, is 5 orders of magnitude more likely to be part of the Milky Way's dark matter halo than part of the stellar content of the Milky Way and Large Magellanic Cloud. No matter the location of Phoebe, it is among the fastest and lowest mass microlensing signals ever detected, with an Einstein timescale of approximately 60 minutes. Using Bayesian modelling, we interpret Phoebe as a PBH with mass $0.032^{+0.227}_{-0.027} M_{\oplus}$, or approximately 3 lunar masses. Phoebe suggests a population of compact, lunar-mass objects associated with the dark matter distribution of the Milky Way, and potentially opens a new window to the physics of inflation.
Editorial analysis
A structured set of objections, weighed in public.
Referee Report
Summary. The paper reports the detection of a ~60-minute microlensing event (Phoebe) in a high-cadence DECam survey toward the LMC. An optical depth probabilistic analysis is used to argue that the lens is 5 orders of magnitude more likely to belong to the Milky Way dark-matter halo than to the stellar populations of the MW or LMC. Bayesian modeling then yields a lens mass of 0.032^{+0.227}_{-0.027} M_⊕ (~3 lunar masses), interpreted as evidence for a population of lunar-mass primordial black holes in the Galactic halo.
Significance. If the probabilistic assignment and mass inference survive detailed scrutiny, the result would constitute the first reported microlensing candidate for lunar-mass compact objects and would open a new observational window on PBH dark matter in a mass range that has been essentially unconstrained. The high-cadence strategy itself is a methodological strength that could be applied more broadly.
major comments (3)
- [optical depth probabilistic analysis] Abstract and § on optical depth analysis: the reported 5-order-of-magnitude preference for halo over stellar lensing is obtained by integrating expected event rates over survey cadence, field, and detection efficiency. The manuscript provides neither the explicit stellar density model, transverse velocity distribution, nor the detection-efficiency function used for the MW-disk + LMC comparison sample. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the ratio is robust or sensitive to the assumptions flagged in the skeptic note.
- [Bayesian modelling] Bayesian modelling section: the mass posterior 0.032^{+0.227}_{-0.027} M_⊕ is conditioned on the halo assignment. The paper does not show the posterior under alternative assignments (e.g., allowing a non-zero stellar contamination fraction) or under varied priors on PBH abundance. This makes the final mass interval and the claim of a new PBH population dependent on the untested halo preference.
- [Results / Event Phoebe] Event detection and light-curve section: no light curve, fitted parameters (t_E, u_0, etc.), or goodness-of-fit metric is presented. The central claim that the event has an Einstein timescale of ~60 min and is among the fastest/lowest-mass signals ever detected therefore rests on an uninspectable analysis step.
minor comments (2)
- [Abstract] Notation: the mass is quoted in Earth masses (M_⊕) while the abstract also refers to lunar masses; a consistent conversion or dual labeling would aid readability.
- [Survey description] The paper should include a table summarizing the survey parameters (cadence, total exposure, number of fields, detection threshold) to allow independent reproduction of the optical-depth integrals.
Simulated Author's Rebuttal
We thank the referee for their detailed and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments point by point below, indicating the revisions we will make to strengthen the presentation and reproducibility of our results.
read point-by-point responses
-
Referee: [optical depth probabilistic analysis] Abstract and § on optical depth analysis: the reported 5-order-of-magnitude preference for halo over stellar lensing is obtained by integrating expected event rates over survey cadence, field, and detection efficiency. The manuscript provides neither the explicit stellar density model, transverse velocity distribution, nor the detection-efficiency function used for the MW-disk + LMC comparison sample. Without these, it is impossible to verify whether the ratio is robust or sensitive to the assumptions flagged in the skeptic note.
Authors: We agree that providing the explicit models is necessary for full verification. In the revised manuscript, we will add a detailed description of the stellar density model for the Milky Way disk and LMC, the assumed transverse velocity distributions, and the detection-efficiency function. We will also include a brief sensitivity analysis to show that the five-order-of-magnitude preference remains robust under reasonable variations in these assumptions. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Bayesian modelling] Bayesian modelling section: the mass posterior 0.032^{+0.227}_{-0.027} M_⊕ is conditioned on the halo assignment. The paper does not show the posterior under alternative assignments (e.g., allowing a non-zero stellar contamination fraction) or under varied priors on PBH abundance. This makes the final mass interval and the claim of a new PBH population dependent on the untested halo preference.
Authors: We will expand the Bayesian modelling section to include the mass posterior distributions under alternative lens population assignments, specifically allowing for a non-zero probability of stellar contamination from the Milky Way or LMC. We will also present results for varied priors on the PBH abundance to demonstrate the sensitivity of the inferred mass. These additions will make the dependence on the halo preference explicit and testable. revision: yes
-
Referee: [Results / Event Phoebe] Event detection and light-curve section: no light curve, fitted parameters (t_E, u_0, etc.), or goodness-of-fit metric is presented. The central claim that the event has an Einstein timescale of ~60 min and is among the fastest/lowest-mass signals ever detected therefore rests on an uninspectable analysis step.
Authors: We acknowledge that the light curve, fitted microlensing parameters, and goodness-of-fit statistics were not included in the submitted version. In the revision, we will present the observed light curve for Phoebe, the best-fit values and uncertainties for t_E, u_0, and other parameters, as well as the chi-squared per degree of freedom or equivalent metric for the fit. This will allow independent inspection of the event detection and characterization. revision: yes
Circularity Check
No significant circularity in derivation chain
full rationale
The paper's central claims rest on an optical depth probabilistic analysis comparing expected microlensing rates for halo versus stellar populations, followed by Bayesian modeling to infer PBH mass. These steps rely on survey cadence, detection efficiency, and population models that are constructed from external stellar density and velocity data rather than being defined in terms of the target result. No self-definitional loops, fitted inputs renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations that reduce the 5-order likelihood ratio or mass posterior to the inputs by construction are identifiable from the provided sections. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks for event rate calculations.
Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger
free parameters (2)
- Einstein crossing time
- PBH mass posterior
axioms (1)
- domain assumption Microlensing optical depth can be used to assign events to halo versus stellar populations with high statistical power.
invented entities (1)
-
Phoebe (lunar-mass PBH)
no independent evidence
Lean theorems connected to this paper
-
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.leanreality_from_one_distinction unclear?
unclearRelation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.
An optical depth probabilistic analysis indicates that the lensing object... is 5 orders of magnitude more likely to be part of the Milky Way's dark matter halo... Using Bayesian modelling, we interpret Phoebe as a PBH with mass 0.032^{+0.227}_{-0.027} M_⊕
What do these tags mean?
- matches
- The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
- supports
- The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
- extends
- The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
- uses
- The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
- contradicts
- The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
- unclear
- Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.
Reference graph
Works this paper leans on
-
[1]
, year = 1974, month = aug, volume =
Black holes in the early Universe. , year = 1974, month = aug, volume =
work page 1974
-
[2]
Microlensing Searches for Exoplanets , volume=
Tsapras, Yiannis , year=. Microlensing Searches for Exoplanets , volume=. Geosciences , publisher=. doi:10.3390/geosciences8100365 , number=
-
[3]
Li, Bichu and Tang, Chan-Yu and Huang, Zhuo-Ran and Liu, Lei-Hua , title =. 2025 , month =. doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/12/008 , url =
-
[4]
Carr, Bernard J. and Green, Anne M. The History of Primordial Black Holes. Primordial Black Holes. 2025. doi:10.1007/978-981-97-8887-3_1
-
[5]
Microlensing constraints on Primordial Black Hole abundance with Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam observations of Andromeda , author =. arXiv 260205840S , year =
-
[6]
Clesse, Sébastien and García-Bellido, Juan , year=. Massive primordial black holes from hybrid inflation as dark matter and the seeds of galaxies , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.92.023524 , number=
-
[7]
Could supermassive black holes be quintessential primordial black holes? , volume=
Bean, Rachel and Magueijo, João , year=. Could supermassive black holes be quintessential primordial black holes? , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.66.063505 , number=
-
[8]
Primordial black holes as generators of cosmic structures , volume=
Carr, Bernard and Silk, Joseph , year=. Primordial black holes as generators of cosmic structures , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1204 , number=
-
[9]
Primordial black holes as a dark matter candidate - a brief overview , journal =. 2024 , note =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2024.116494 , author =
-
[10]
Carr, B.J. and Clesse, S. and García-Bellido, J. and Hawkins, M.R.S. and Kühnel, F. , year=. Observational evidence for primordial black holes: A positivist perspective , volume=. doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2023.11.005 , journal=
- [11]
-
[12]
GRAVITATIONAL MICROLENSING IN THE LOCAL GROUP , volume=
Paczy\'nski, Bohdan , year=. GRAVITATIONAL MICROLENSING IN THE LOCAL GROUP , volume=. Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics , publisher=. doi:10.1146/annurev.astro.34.1.419 , number=
- [13]
-
[14]
B. Carr and F. Kuhnel and M. Sandstad. Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter. Phys. Rev. D. 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.94.083504
-
[15]
, year = 1964, month = jan, volume =
The gravitational lens effect. , year = 1964, month = jan, volume =
work page 1964
-
[16]
Schneider, Peter and Ehlers, Jürgen and Falco, Emilio E , address =. Gravitational lenses , year =
-
[17]
De Rujula, A. and Giudice, G. F. and Mollerach, S. and Roulet, E. , year=. Whither do the microlensing agents rove? , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/275.3.545 , number=
-
[18]
Can Lensed Stars Be Regarded as Pointlike for Microlensing by MACHOs?. , keywords =
-
[19]
N. Afshordi and P. McDonald and D. N. Spergel , title =. doi:10.1086/378763 , year = 2003, month =
-
[20]
Galactic Microlensing as a Method of Detecting Massive Compact Halo Objects. , keywords =
-
[21]
Griest, Kim and Lehner, Matthew J. and Cieplak, Agnieszka M. and Jain, Bhuvnesh , year=. Microlensing of Kepler Stars as a Method of Detecting Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter , volume=. Physical Review Letters , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.107.231101 , number=
-
[22]
Finite-Source Effects in Microlensing: A Precise, Easy to Implement, Fast, and Numerically Stable Formalism. , keywords =
-
[23]
Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy , keywords =
Gravitational Lensing by Stars in a Galaxy Halo - Theory of Combined Weak and Strong Scattering. Journal of Astrophysics and Astronomy , keywords =
-
[24]
The statistics of gravitational lenses - Appaarent changes in the luminosity function of distant sources due to passage of light through a single galaxy. , keywords =
-
[26]
Riffeser, A. and Fliri, J. and Seitz, S. and Bender, R. , year=. Microlensing toward Crowded Fields: Theory and Applications to M31 , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , publisher=. doi:10.1086/500010 , number=
-
[27]
Exploring the Very Extended Low-surface-brightness Stellar Populations of the Large Magellanic Cloud with SMASH. , keywords =
-
[28]
and Olsen, Knut and Choi, Yumi and Ruiz-Lara, Tomas and Miller, Amy E
Nidever, David L. and Olsen, Knut and Choi, Yumi and Ruiz-Lara, Tomas and Miller, Amy E. and Johnson, L. Clifton and Bell, Cameron P. M. and Blum, Robert D. and Cioni, Maria-Rosa L. and Gallart, Carme and Majewski, Steven R. and Martin, Nicolas F. and Massana, Pol and Monachesi, Antonela and Noël, Noelia E. D. and Sakowska, Joanna D. and van der Marel, Ro...
-
[29]
and Mateo, Mario and Saha, Abhijit
Schechter, Paul L. and Mateo, Mario and Saha, Abhijit. DOPHOT, a CCD photometry program: Description and tests. Publ. Astron. Soc. Pac. 1993. doi:10.1086/133316
-
[30]
Saha, Abhijit and Olszewski, Edward W. and Brondel, Brian and Olsen, Knut and Knezek, Patricia and Harris, Jason and Smith, Chris and Subramaniam, Annapurni and Claver, Jennifer and Rest, Armin and Seitzer, Patrick and Cook, Kem H. and Minniti, Dante and Suntzeff, Nicholas B. , year=. FIRST RESULTS FROM THE NOAO SURVEY OF THE OUTER LIMITS OF THE MAGELLANI...
-
[31]
J. von Neumann and R. H. Kent and H. R. Bellinson and B. I. Hart , journal =. The Mean Square Successive Difference , urldate =
-
[32]
and Byun, Yong Ik and Chang, Seo Won and Marquette, Jean Baptiste and Shin, Min Su
Kim, Dae Won and Pavlos Protopapas and Bailer-Jones, Coryn A.L. and Byun, Yong Ik and Chang, Seo Won and Marquette, Jean Baptiste and Shin, Min Su. The EPOCH Project: I. Periodic variable stars in the EROS-2 LMC database \^a. Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2014. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201323252
-
[33]
The Monitor project: data processing and light curve production. , keywords =
-
[34]
Curtis McCully and Steve Crawford and Gabor Kovacs and Erik Tollerud and Edward Betts and Larry Bradley and Matt Craig and James Turner and Ole Streicher and Brigitta Sipocz and Thomas Robitaille and Christoph Deil , title =
- [35]
- [36]
-
[37]
Summary of the content and survey properties
Gaia Data Release 3. Summary of the content and survey properties. , keywords =
-
[38]
VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia DR3 Part 1. Main source (Gaia Collaboration, 2022). 2022 , month =. doi:10.26093/cds/vizier.1355 , adsurl =
-
[39]
Eyer, L. and Audard, M. and Holl, B. and Rimoldini, L. and Carnerero, M. I. and Clementini, G. and De Ridder, J. and Distefano, E. and Evans, D. W. and Gavras, P. and Gomel, R. and Lebzelter, T. and Marton, G. and Mowlavi, N. and Panahi, A. and Ripepi, V. and Wyrzykowski, Ł. and Nienartowicz, K. and Jevardat de Fombelle, G. and Lecoeur-Taibi, I. and Rohrb...
-
[40]
Variability (Gaia Collaboration, 2022)
VizieR Online Data Catalog: Gaia DR3 Part 4. Variability (Gaia Collaboration, 2022). 2022 , month =
work page 2022
-
[41]
Griest, Kim and Cieplak, Agnieszka M. and Lehner, Matthew J. , year=. Experiemental Limits on Primordial Black Holes Dark Matter from the First 2 Years of KEPLER Data , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1088/0004-637x/786/2/158 , number=
-
[42]
AstroPhot: Fitting Everything Everywhere All at Once in Astronomical Images. , keywords =
-
[43]
Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII , year = 2014, editor =
The DECam Community Pipeline. Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXIII , year = 2014, editor =
work page 2014
-
[44]
astropy/photutils: 1.8.0 , month = may, year = 2023, publisher =
Larry Bradley and Brigitta Sip. astropy/photutils: 1.8.0 , month = may, year = 2023, publisher =
work page 2023
-
[45]
Robinson, Connor E. and Espaillat, Catherine C. and Rodriguez, Joseph E. , year=. Understanding Accretion Variability through TESS Observations of Taurus , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac7e51 , number=
-
[46]
and Kreplin, Alexander and Monnier, John D
Labdon, Aaron and Kraus, Stefan and Davies, Claire L. and Kreplin, Alexander and Monnier, John D. and Le Bouquin, Jean-Baptiste and Anugu, Narsireddy and ten Brummelaar, Theo and Setterholm, Benjamin and Gardner, Tyler and Ennis, Jacob and Lanthermann, Cyprien and Schaefer, Gail and Laws, Anna , year=. Viscous heating in the disk of the outbursting star F...
-
[47]
Zsidi, G. and Manara, C. F. and Kóspál, Á. and Hussain, G. A. J. and Ábrahám, P. and Alecian, E. and Bódi, A. and Pál, A. and Sarkis, P. , year=. Accretion variability from minute to decade timescales in the classical T Tauri star CR Cha , volume=. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202142203 , journal=
-
[48]
De Marco, Orsola and Izzard, Robert G. , year=. Dawes Review 6: The Impact of Companions on Stellar Evolution , volume=. doi:10.1017/pasa.2016.52 , journal=
-
[49]
Stellar Granulation as the Source of High-frequency Flicker in Kepler Light Curves. , keywords =
-
[50]
Gaia 19ajj: A Young Star Brightening Due to Enhanced Accretion and Reduced Extinction. , keywords =
-
[51]
Hakala, Pasi and Ramsay, Gavin and Potter, Stephen B and Beardmore, Andrew and Buckley, David A H and Wynn, Graham , year=. TESS observations of the asynchronous polar CD Ind: mapping the changing accretion geometry , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stz992 , number=
-
[52]
Lightkurve: Kepler and TESS time series analysis in Python
-
[53]
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , volume =
Yan, Y and He, H and Li, C and Esamdin, A and Tan, B L and Zhang, L Y and Wang, H , title = ". Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society: Letters , volume =. 2021 , month =
work page 2021
-
[54]
doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1798 , year =
S Webb and C Flynn and J Cooke and J Zhang and A Mahabal and T M C Abbott and R Allen and I Andreoni and S A Bird and S Goode and M Lochner and T Pritchard , title =. doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1798 , year =
-
[55]
doi:10.1093/mnras/stab979 , year = 2021, month =
James A G Jackman and Peter J Wheatley and Jack S Acton and David R Anderson and Daniel Bayliss and Joshua T Briegal and Matthew R Burleigh and Sarah L Casewell and Boris T Gänsicke and Samuel Gill and Edward Gillen and Michael R Goad and Maximilian N Günther and Beth A Henderson and Simon T Hodgkin and James S Jenkins and Chloe Pugh and Didier Queloz and...
-
[56]
Living Reviews in Solar Physics , volume=
Stellar flares , author=. Living Reviews in Solar Physics , volume=. 2024 , pages=
work page 2024
-
[57]
doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6c3c , year =
Hongjing Yang and Weicheng Zang and Tianjun Gan and Renkun Kuang and Andrew Gould and Shude Mao , title =. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ad6c3c , year =
-
[58]
Mr\'oz, P. , year=. TESS Free-floating Planet Candidate Is Likely a Stellar Flare , volume=. Acta Astronomica , publisher=. doi:10.32023/0001-5237/73.4.1 , number=
-
[59]
Pietras, M. and Falewicz, R. and Siarkowski, M. and Bicz, K. and Preś, P. , year=. Statistical Analysis of Stellar Flares from the First Three Years of TESS Observations , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac8352 , number=
-
[60]
Properties of flare events based on light curves from the TESS survey. , keywords =
-
[61]
and Zhan, Zhuchang and Seager, Sara and Rimmer, Paul B
Günther, Maximilian N. and Zhan, Zhuchang and Seager, Sara and Rimmer, Paul B. and Ranjan, Sukrit and Stassun, Keivan G. and Oelkers, Ryan J. and Daylan, Tansu and Newton, Elisabeth and Kristiansen, Martti H. and Olah, Katalin and Gillen, Edward and Rappaport, Saul and Ricker, George R. and Vanderspek, Roland K. and Latham, David W. and Winn, Joshua N. an...
-
[62]
Kepler Flares. II. The Temporal Morphology of White-light Flares on GJ 1243. , keywords =
-
[63]
Discovery of a First Terrestrial-Mass Candidate , author=
Searching for Free-Floating Planets with TESS: I. Discovery of a First Terrestrial-Mass Candidate , author=. 2024 , eprint=
work page 2024
-
[64]
James R. A. Davenport , title =. doi:10.3847/0004-637X/829/1/23 , year =
-
[65]
Do Long-cadence Data of the Kepler Spacecraft Capture Basic Properties of Flares?. , keywords =
-
[66]
Updated constraints on asteroid-mass primordial black holes as dark matter , volume=
Smyth, Nolan and Profumo, Stefano and English, Samuel and Jeltema, Tesla and McKinnon, Kevin and Guhathakurta, Puragra , year=. Updated constraints on asteroid-mass primordial black holes as dark matter , volume=. Physical Review D , publisher=. doi:10.1103/physrevd.101.063005 , number=
-
[67]
The Astrophysical Journal , author =
Schlegel, David J. and Finkbeiner, Douglas P. and Davis, Marc , year=. Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1086/305772 , number=
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.1086/305772
-
[68]
Abbott, T. M. C. and Abdalla, F. B. and Allam, S. and Amara, A. and Annis, J. and Asorey, J. and Avila, S. and Ballester, O. and Banerji, M. and Barkhouse, W. and Baruah, L. and Baumer, M. and Bechtol, K. and Becker, M. R. and Benoit-Lévy, A. and Bernstein, G. M. and Bertin, E. and Blazek, J. and Bocquet, S. and Brooks, D. and Brout, D. and Buckley-Geer, ...
- [69]
-
[70]
Empirical metallicity-dependent calibrations of effective temperature against colours for dwarfs and giants based on interferometric data. , keywords =
-
[71]
The VMC survey - XLIV: mapping metallicity trends in the large magellanic cloud using near-infrared passbands. , keywords =
-
[72]
Revealing the Chemical Structure of the Magellanic Clouds with APOGEE. I. Calculating Individual Stellar Ages of RGB Stars in the Large Magellanic Cloud , author=. 2023 , eprint=
work page 2023
-
[73]
isochrones: Stellar model grid package
-
[74]
Choi, Jieun and Dotter, Aaron and Conroy, Charlie and Cantiello, Matteo and Paxton, Bill and Johnson, Benjamin D. , year=. MESA ISOCHRONES AND STELLAR TRACKS (MIST). I. SOLAR-SCALED MODELS , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102 , number=
work page internal anchor Pith review doi:10.3847/0004-637x/823/2/102
-
[75]
Willmer, Christopher N. A. , year=. The Absolute Magnitude of the Sun in Several Filters , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series , publisher=. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aabfdf , number=
-
[76]
Abuter, R. and Amorim, A. and Bauböck, M. and Berger, J. P. and Bonnet, H. and Brandner, W. and Clénet, Y. and Coudé du Foresto, V. and de Zeeuw, P. T. and Dexter, J. and Duvert, G. and Eckart, A. and Eisenhauer, F. and Förster Schreiber, N. M. and Garcia, P. and Gao, F. and Gendron, E. and Genzel, R. and Gerhard, O. and Gillessen, S. and Habibi, M. and H...
-
[77]
Besla, Gurtina and Hernquist, Lars and Loeb, Abraham , year=. The origin of the microlensing events observed towards the LMC and the stellar counterpart of the Magellanic stream , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/sts192 , number=
-
[78]
Wang, Long and Kouwenhoven, M. B. N. and Zheng, Xiaochen and Church, Ross P. and Davies, Melvyn B. , year=. Close encounters involving free-floating planets in star clusters , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stv542 , number=
-
[79]
Constraints on sub-terrestrial free-floating planets from Subaru microlensing observations , volume=
DeRocco, William and Smyth, Nolan and Profumo, Stefano , year=. Constraints on sub-terrestrial free-floating planets from Subaru microlensing observations , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/stad3824 , number=
-
[80]
Updating the MACHO fraction of the Milky Way dark halo with improved mass models , volume=
Calcino, Josh and García-Bellido, Juan and Davis, Tamara M , year=. Updating the MACHO fraction of the Milky Way dark halowith improved mass models , volume=. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society , publisher=. doi:10.1093/mnras/sty1368 , number=
-
[81]
Navarro, Julio F. and Frenk, Carlos S. and White, Simon D. M. , year=. A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering , volume=. The Astrophysical Journal , publisher=. doi:10.1086/304888 , number=
discussion (0)
Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.