pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20029 · v1 · pith:M4TQS42Vnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Vortex order in magnetic frustrated GeNi₂O₄ and GeCo₂O₄ spinels

K. Beauvois , J. Robert , M. Songvilay , J. Ollivier , B. F{\aa}k , E. Ressouche , N. Qureshi , R. Ballou
show 6 more authors
S. Petit S. Lenne P. Manuel S. DeBrion P. Strobel V. Simonet
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:51 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords spin vortex crystalmagnetic frustrationpyrochlore latticeneutron scatteringmulti-k magnetic orderBloch pointsspinel compoundsmagnetic anisotropy
0
0 comments X

The pith

Magnetic anisotropy stabilizes a 2-k spin vortex crystal in GeNi2O4 and GeCo2O4 spinels.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Frustrated spinels like GeNi2O4 and GeCo2O4 feature complex interactions on the pyrochlore lattice that, together with magnetic anisotropy, can generate novel spin textures such as vortices. The authors explore exchange phase diagrams and use combined modeling of inelastic neutron scattering and single-crystal diffraction to identify a 2-k magnetic structure. This structure manifests as a short-period spin vortex crystal, arising from the anisotropy acting on the 3-k Bloch-point structure that would occur for isotropic spins. This provides a rationalization for how multi-k orders evolve with anisotropy in such materials, which matters for understanding frustrated magnetism.

Core claim

The central discovery is that a 2-k magnetic structure is stabilized in these compounds, leading to a short period spin vortex crystal that is induced by the magnetic anisotropy as a variant of the 3-k Bloch-point structure predicted for isotropic spins on the pyrochlore lattice.

What carries the argument

The 2-k magnetic structure on the pyrochlore lattice, which carries the argument by producing the observed neutron scattering signatures and the vortex crystal order.

If this is right

  • The formation of multi-k spin textures in frustrated antiferromagnets is rationalized by the interplay of anisotropy and extended interactions.
  • Anisotropy causes the evolution from 3-k Bloch-point structures to 2-k vortex crystals.
  • Similar stabilization of vortex orders can be expected in other GeB2O4 family members.
  • Combined neutron diffraction and inelastic scattering modeling can identify these structures in related compounds.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Small variations in anisotropy through doping or strain might allow switching between different multi-k vortex states.
  • The mechanism could extend to other pyrochlore-based frustrated magnets where Bloch points or vortices are predicted.
  • Further studies might test if external magnetic fields can manipulate the period of these vortex crystals.

Load-bearing premise

The phase diagrams of exchange interactions for the GeB2O4 family accurately describe the interactions beyond first neighbors on the pyrochlore lattice.

What would settle it

A neutron scattering experiment revealing magnetic order or excitations not matching the 2-k vortex crystal model would disprove the stabilization of this structure.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20029 by B. F{\aa}k, E. Ressouche, J. Ollivier, J. Robert, K. Beauvois, M. Songvilay, N. Qureshi, P. Manuel, P. Strobel, R. Ballou, S. deBrion, S. Lenne, S. Petit, V. Simonet.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. (a) Structure of the spinel oxide of generic formula [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Left: Dynamical structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Measured diffuse inelastic scattering for GNO (a-b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Measured (above on IN5 and below on Panther) and calculated dynamical structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Measured (above on IN5 and below on Panther) and calculated dynamic structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Measured magnetic Bragg peak intensities versus [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. Energies per spins expressed in units of the interac [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Fourier components of the four sublattices [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: FIG. 11. Calculated dynamic structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: FIG. 12. Comparison of the measured dynamic structure factor [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: FIG. 13. The eigenvalues [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: FIG. 14. Magnetic space groups of the 2- [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

In the search for new spin textures based on singular magnetic objects like Bloch-points or vortices, spinel compounds emerge as an interesting playground due to the interplay between magnetic anisotropy and complex interactions that extend well beyond first neighbors on a pyrochlore lattice. Based on an exploration of the exchange interaction phase diagrams of members of the Ge$B_2$O$_4$ family with $B$=Co and Ni, we show, using simultaneous modeling of inelastic neutron scattering measurements and single-crystal neutron diffraction data, that a 2-$k$ magnetic structure may be stabilized in these compounds. This leads to a short period spin vortex crystal, a variant induced by the magnetic anisotropy of the 3-$k$ Bloch-point structure predicted for isotropic spins. Our study rationalizes the formation of these multi-$k$ spin textures in frustrated antiferromagnets, as well as their anisotropy-dependent evolution.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript explores magnetic structures in the frustrated spinel compounds GeNi₂O₄ and GeCo₂O₄. By mapping exchange interaction phase diagrams for the GeB₂O₄ family and performing simultaneous modeling of inelastic neutron scattering (INS) and single-crystal neutron diffraction data, the authors conclude that a 2-k magnetic structure is stabilized. This yields a short-period spin vortex crystal, presented as an anisotropy-induced variant of the 3-k Bloch-point structure expected for isotropic spins on the pyrochlore lattice.

Significance. If the modeling and parameter constraints hold, the work offers a concrete example of how magnetic anisotropy selects among competing multi-k orders in pyrochlore antiferromagnets. The combined use of INS and diffraction data to constrain further-neighbor exchanges is a methodological strength that could help rationalize vortex-like textures in other frustrated systems.

major comments (2)
  1. [Exchange interaction phase diagrams and simultaneous modeling] The central claim that the observed data correspond to the 2-k vortex structure rather than competing 3-k or single-k orders rests on the fitted exchange parameters placing the system inside the 2-k region of the phase diagram. The manuscript does not show an explicit robustness check (e.g., variation of further-neighbor couplings or anisotropy terms within their uncertainty ranges) demonstrating that the ground state remains in the 2-k basin; small shifts can move the system across phase boundaries on the pyrochlore lattice.
  2. [Neutron diffraction analysis] Diffraction intensities are used to support the 2-k assignment, yet the text does not report quantitative comparison (e.g., R-factors or intensity residuals) of the 2-k model against alternative multi-k structures that could produce similar Bragg-peak patterns. Without this, it remains unclear whether the 2-k vortex is uniquely required by the data or simply one consistent interpretation.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Introduction and results] Notation for the multi-k vectors (k₁, k₂) and the definition of the short-period vortex crystal should be clarified with explicit real-space spin configurations or a figure showing the unit cell.
  2. [Modeling section] Error bars or uncertainty ranges on the fitted exchange parameters (J₁, J₂, …) are not stated; these should be provided so readers can assess how close the solution lies to phase boundaries.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive evaluation of the significance of our work and for the detailed, constructive comments. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to strengthen the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Exchange interaction phase diagrams and simultaneous modeling] The central claim that the observed data correspond to the 2-k vortex structure rather than competing 3-k or single-k orders rests on the fitted exchange parameters placing the system inside the 2-k region of the phase diagram. The manuscript does not show an explicit robustness check (e.g., variation of further-neighbor couplings or anisotropy terms within their uncertainty ranges) demonstrating that the ground state remains in the 2-k basin; small shifts can move the system across phase boundaries on the pyrochlore lattice.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit robustness analysis would strengthen the central claim. Although the simultaneous fit to INS and diffraction data yields parameters that locate both compounds inside the 2-k region of the phase diagram, we did not previously display the effect of parameter variations within their uncertainties. In the revised manuscript we will add a supplementary section (with an accompanying figure) that systematically varies the further-neighbor exchanges and anisotropy terms within their estimated error ranges and confirms that the ground state remains 2-k for both GeNi₂O₄ and GeCo₂O₄. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Neutron diffraction analysis] Diffraction intensities are used to support the 2-k assignment, yet the text does not report quantitative comparison (e.g., R-factors or intensity residuals) of the 2-k model against alternative multi-k structures that could produce similar Bragg-peak patterns. Without this, it remains unclear whether the 2-k vortex is uniquely required by the data or simply one consistent interpretation.

    Authors: We acknowledge that quantitative goodness-of-fit metrics comparing the 2-k model against 3-k and single-k alternatives were not reported. The simultaneous modeling already incorporates the diffraction intensities, but we agree that explicit R-factor or residual comparisons would make the preference for the 2-k structure clearer. In the revised manuscript we will add a table (or supplementary table) that lists the R-factors and intensity residuals obtained when fitting the same data with 2-k, 3-k, and single-k models, thereby demonstrating that the 2-k vortex crystal provides the best description. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; modeling derives structure from data fit within independent phase diagrams

full rationale

The paper explores exchange phase diagrams for the GeB2O4 family and then performs simultaneous modeling of INS and diffraction data to identify stabilization of a 2-k structure. This is a standard data-constrained determination of magnetic order rather than a self-referential loop. No quoted step reduces a claimed prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rest solely on self-citation whose content is unverified. The derivation remains self-contained against the neutron measurements as external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the validity of exchange phase diagrams for the GeB2O4 family and the assumption that neutron data can be simultaneously fit to a 2-k vortex model; no explicit free parameters or invented entities are named in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Complex interactions extend well beyond first neighbors on a pyrochlore lattice in GeB2O4 spinels.
    Invoked in the opening to justify exploration of phase diagrams.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5751 in / 1329 out tokens · 31336 ms · 2026-05-20T03:51:56.209892+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

101 extracted references · 101 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The Bloch points are elongated along a⟨111⟩direction (diagonal of the cube) and shown in two different views

    (c-d) Sketches of the 3-kcuboctahedral stack spin arrangements described in refs [54, 101], declined in two forms from a global spin rotation: hedgehog (c) and circulating (d) Bloch-points structures. The Bloch points are elongated along a⟨111⟩direction (diagonal of the cube) and shown in two different views. The four Bra- vais lattices are indicated by d...

    work page doi:10.5291/ill-data.test-2935 2024

  2. [2]

    We also acknowledge B

    and on D23 (data can be provided on request). We also acknowledge B. Oulladdiaf for allowing us to use Orient Express and P. Fouilloux, J. Halbwachs and O. Meulien for their technical assistance on the ILL instru- ments. We thank J. Debray for the orientation of some samples. We also acknowledge Laboratoire Léon Bril- louin for the beam time on 2T to perf...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Spin configura- tion of magnetic ions on b-sites in normal cubic spinels

    Toshiro Akino and Kazuko Motizuki. Spin configura- tion of magnetic ions on b-sites in normal cubic spinels. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 31(3):691–705, 1971

    work page 1971

  4. [4]

    P. W. Anderson. –. In G. T. Rado and H. Suhl, editors, Magnetism, volume I, page 25. Academic Press, New York, 1963

    work page 1963

  5. [5]

    Hedgehog- lattice spin texture in classical heisenberg antiferromag- nets on the breathing pyrochlore lattice.Phys

    Kazushi Aoyama and Hikaru Kawamura. Hedgehog- lattice spin texture in classical heisenberg antiferromag- nets on the breathing pyrochlore lattice.Phys. Rev. B, 103:014406, Jan 2021

    work page 2021

  6. [6]

    M. I. Aroyo, editor.International Tables for Crystal- lography, volume A: Space-group symmetry. Wiley, 6th edition, 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Barton, Moureen C

    Phillip T. Barton, Moureen C. Kemei, Michael W. Gaultois, Stephanie L. Moffitt, Lucy E. Darago, Ram Seshadri, Matthew R. Suchomel, and Brent C. Melot. Structural distortion below the néel temperature in spinelgeco 2o4.Phys. Rev. B, 90:064105, Aug 2014

    work page 2014

  8. [8]

    T. Basu, T. Zou, Z. Dun, C. Q. Xu, C. R. Dela Cruz, Tao Hong, H. B. Cao, K. M. Taddei, H. D. Zhou, and X. Ke. Magnetic field induced phase transition in spinel geni2o4.Phys. Rev. B, 102:134421, Oct 2020

    work page 2020

  9. [9]

    G. R. Berdiyorov, M. V. Milošević, and F. M. Peeters. Vortex configurations and critical parameters in super- conducting thin films containing antidot arrays: Non- linear ginzburg-landau theory.Phys. Rev. B, 74:174512, Nov 2006

    work page 2006

  10. [10]

    E. F. Bertaut. Configurations magnétiques. méthode de fourier.Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids, 21(3):256–279, December 1961

    work page 1961

  11. [12]

    E. F. Bertaut, V. van Qui, R. Pauthenet, and A. Murasik.Journal de Physique, 25:516, 1964

    work page 1964

  12. [13]

    M. T. Birch, D. Cortés-Ortuño, L. A. Turnbull, M. N. Wilson, F. Groß, N. Träger, A. Laurenson, N. Bukin, S. H. Moody, M. Weigand, G. Schütz, H. Popescu, R. Fan, P. Steadman, J. A. T. Verezhak, G. Balakrish- nan, J. C. Loudon, A. C. Twitchett-Harrison, O. Hov- orka, H. Fangohr, F. Y. Ogrin, J. Gräfe, and P. D. Hat- ton. Real-space imaging of confined magne...

    work page 2020

  13. [14]

    B. J. Campbell, H. T. Stokes, J. M. Perez-Mato, and J. Rodríguez-Carvajal. Introducing a unified magnetic space-group symbol.Acta Cryst., A78:99–106, 2022

    work page 2022

  14. [15]

    B. J. Campbell, H. T. Stokes, J. M. Perez-Mato, and J. Rodríguez-Carvajal. A recapitulation of magnetic space groups and their uni symbols.Acta Cryst., B80:401–408, 2024

    work page 2024

  15. [16]

    D. J. Campbell, M. Frachet, S. Benhabib, I. Gilmutdi- nov, C. Proust, T. Kurosawa, N. Momono, M. Oda, M. Horio, K. Kramer, J. Chang, M. Ichioka, and D. LeBoeuf. Evidence for a square-square vortex lattice 11 transition in a high-Tc cuprate superconductor.Phys. Rev. Lett., 129:067001, Aug 2022

    work page 2022

  16. [17]

    Chaix, J

    L. Chaix, J. Robert, E. Chan, E. Ressouche, S. Pe- tit, C. V. Colin, R. Ballou, J. Ollivier, L.-P. Regnault, E. Lhotel, V. Cathelin, S. Lenne, C. Cavenel, F. Damay, E. Suard, P. Strobel, C. Darie, S. deBrion, and V. Si- monet. Fromtriangularcorrelatedparamagnettomulti- qnoncoplanar spin state in spinelgefe 2o4.Phys. Rev. Lett., 136:016703, Jan 2026

    work page 2026

  17. [18]

    K. W. Chow, S. C. Tsang, and C. C. Mak. Another exact solution for two-dimensional, inviscid sinh Poisson vortex arrays.Physics of Fluids, 15(8):2437–2440, 08 2003

    work page 2003

  18. [19]

    M. K. Crawford, R. L. Harlow, P. L. Lee, Y. Zhang, J. Hormadaly, R. Flippen, Q. Huang, J. W. Lynn, R. Stevens, B. F. Woodfield, J. Boerio-Goates, and R. A. Fisher. Structure and properties of the integer- spin frustrated antiferromagnetgeni2o4.Phys. Rev. B, 68:220408, Dec 2003

    work page 2003

  19. [20]

    Da Col, S

    S. Da Col, S. Jamet, N. Rougemaille, A. Locatelli, T. O. Mentes, B. Santos Burgos, R. Afid, M. Darques, L. Cagnon, J. C. Toussaint, and O. Fruchart. Observa- tion of bloch-point domain walls in cylindrical magnetic nanowires.Phys. Rev. B, 89:180405, May 2014

    work page 2014

  20. [21]

    S. Diaz, S. de Brion, G. Chouteau, B. Canals, V. Si- monet, and P. Strobel. Magnetic frustration in the spinel compoundsGeco 2o4 andGeni 2o4.Phys. Rev. B, 74:092404, Sep 2006

    work page 2006

  21. [22]

    Dwight and N

    K. Dwight and N. Menyuk. Magnetic interactions and spiral ground states in spinels, with application to zncr2se4.Phys. Rev., 163:435–443, Nov 1967

    work page 1967

  22. [23]

    W. Döring. Point Singularities in Micromagnetism. Journal of Applied Physics, 39(2):1006–1007, 02 1968

    work page 1968

  23. [24]

    Elliot, P

    M. Elliot, P. A. McClarty, D. Prabhakaran, R. D. John- son, H. C. Walker, P. Manuel, and R. Coldea. Order- by-disorder from bond-dependent exchange and inten- sity signature of nodal quasiparticles in a honeycomb cobaltate.Nature Communications, 12(1):3936, 2021

    work page 2021

  24. [25]

    Fabrèges, E

    X. Fabrèges, E. Ressouche, F. Duc, S. de Brion, M. Amara, C. Detlefs, L. Paolasini, E. Suard, L.-P. Regnault, B. Canals, P. Strobel, and V. Simonet. Field- driven magnetostructural transitions ingeco2o4.Phys. Rev. B, 95:014428, Jan 2017

    work page 2017

  25. [26]

    Feldkeller.Z

    R. Feldkeller.Z. Angew. Physik, 19:530, 1965

    work page 1965

  26. [28]

    Fujishiro, N

    Y. Fujishiro, N. Kanazawa, T. Nakajima, X. Z. Yu, K. Ohishi, Y. Kawamura, K. Kakurai, T. Arima, H. Mi- tamura, A. Miyake, K. Akiba, M. Tokunaga, A. Mat- suo, K. Kindo, T. Koretsune, R. Arita, and Y. Tokura. Topological transitions among skyrmion- and hedgehog- lattice states in cubic chiral magnets.Nature Commu- nications, 10(1):1059, 2019

    work page 2019

  27. [29]

    B. Fåk, S. Rols, G. Manzin, and O. Meulien. Panther — the new thermal neutron time-of- flight spectrometer at the ill.EPJ Web Conf., 272:02001, 2022

    work page 2022

  28. [30]

    Spontaneous vortex-antivortex lattice and majorana fermions in rhombohedral graphene.Phys

    Filippo Gaggioli, Daniele Guerci, and Liang Fu. Spontaneous vortex-antivortex lattice and majorana fermions in rhombohedral graphene.Phys. Rev. Lett., 135:116001, Sep 2025

    work page 2025

  29. [31]

    Gao, Rosales H

    S. Gao, Rosales H. D., Gómez Albarracín F. A., V. Tsurkan, G Kaur, T. Fennell, P. Steffens, M. Boehm, P. Čermák, A. Schneidewind, E. Ressouche, D. C. Cabra, C. Ruegg, and O. Zaharko. Fractional anti- ferromagnetic skyrmion lattice induced by anisotropic couplings.Nature, 586(7827):37–41, 2020

    work page 2020

  30. [32]

    White, Gregory S

    Shang Gao, Oksana Zaharko, Vladimir Tsurkan, Yixi Su, Jonathan S. White, Gregory S. Tucker, Bertrand Roessli, Frederic Bourdarot, Romain Sibille, Dmitry Chernyshov, Tom Fennell, Alois Loidl, and Christian Rüegg. Spiral spin-liquid and the emergence of a vortex- like state in mnsc2s4.Nature Physics, 13(2):157–161, 2017

    work page 2017

  31. [33]

    Tretiakov

    Börge Göbel, Ingrid Mertig, and Oleg A. Tretiakov. Be- yond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alterna- tive magnetic quasiparticles.Physics Reports, 895:1– 28, 2021. Beyond skyrmions: Review and perspectives of alternative magnetic quasiparticles

    work page 2021

  32. [34]

    Gurarie and K

    D. Gurarie and K. W. Chow. Vortex arrays for sinh- Poisson equation of two-dimensional fluids: Equilibria and stability.Physics of Fluids, 16(9):3296–3305, 09 2004

    work page 2004

  33. [35]

    O(3)nonlinearσmodelandthetopo- logical distinction between integer- and half-integer-spin antiferromagnets in two dimensions.Phys

    F.D.M.Haldane. O(3)nonlinearσmodelandthetopo- logical distinction between integer- and half-integer-spin antiferromagnets in two dimensions.Phys. Rev. Lett., 61:1029–1032, Aug 1988

    work page 1988

  34. [36]

    Crawford, Kouichi Takase, Yoshiki Takano, and Kazuko Sekizawa

    Shigeo Hara, Yoshiyuki Yoshida, Shin-Ichi Ikeda, Naoki Shirakawa, Michael K. Crawford, Kouichi Takase, Yoshiki Takano, and Kazuko Sekizawa. Crystal growth of germanium-based oxide spinels by the float zone method.Journal of Crystal Growth, 283(1):185–192, 2005

    work page 2005

  35. [37]

    Néel- and bloch- type magnetic vortices in rashba metals.Phys

    Satoru Hayami and Yukitoshi Motome. Néel- and bloch- type magnetic vortices in rashba metals.Phys. Rev. Lett., 121:137202, Sep 2018

    work page 2018

  36. [38]

    Noncoplanar multiple-qspin textures by itinerant frustration: Effects of single-ion anisotropy and bond-dependent anisotropy

    Satoru Hayami and Yukitoshi Motome. Noncoplanar multiple-qspin textures by itinerant frustration: Effects of single-ion anisotropy and bond-dependent anisotropy. Phys. Rev. B, 103:054422, Feb 2021

    work page 2021

  37. [39]

    Equivalent type-ii magnetic structures: Coo a collinear antiferromagnet.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 11(10):2123, may 1978

    D Herrmann-Ronzaud, P Burlet, and J Rossat-Mignod. Equivalent type-ii magnetic structures: Coo a collinear antiferromagnet.Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics, 11(10):2123, may 1978

    work page 1978

  38. [40]

    Holstein and H

    T. Holstein and H. Primakoff. Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet.Phys. Rev., 58:1098–1113, Dec 1940

    work page 1940

  39. [41]

    Hoshi, H

    T. Hoshi, H. Aruga Katori, M. Kosaka, and H. Tak- agi. Magnetic properties of single crystal of cobalt spinelgeco 2o4.J. of Magnetism and Magnetic Mate- rials, 310:e448–e450, March 2007

    work page 2007

  40. [42]

    Hubsch and G

    J. Hubsch and G. Gavoille. First order magnetic phase transition in geco2o4.Journal of Magnetism and Mag- netic Materials, 66(1):17–22, 1987

    work page 1987

  41. [43]

    Dynam- ics of the bloch point in an asymmetric permalloy disk

    Mi-Young Im, Hee-Sung Han, Min-Seung Jung, Young- Sang Yu, Sooseok Lee, Seongsoo Yoon, Weilun Chao, Peter Fischer, Jung-Il Hong, and Ki-Suk Lee. Dynam- ics of the bloch point in an asymmetric permalloy disk. Nature Communications, 10(1):593, 2019

    work page 2019

  42. [44]

    Structural, magnetic, dielectric, and opticalpropertiesofdycro3andgeni2o4materials, 2022

    Biljana Indovski. Structural, magnetic, dielectric, and opticalpropertiesofdycro3andgeni2o4materials, 2022

    work page 2022

  43. [45]

    Ishiwata, T

    S. Ishiwata, T. Nakajima, J.-H. Kim, D. S. Inosov, N. Kanazawa, J. S. White, J. L. Gavilano, R. Georgii, K.M.Seemann, G.Brandl, P.Manuel, D.D.Khalyavin, 12 S. Seki, Y. Tokunaga, M. Kinoshita, Y. W. Long, Y. Kaneko, Y. Taguchi, T. Arima, B. Keimer, and Y. Tokura. Emergent topological spin structures in the centrosymmetric cubic perovskitesrfeo3.Phys. Rev. ...

    work page 2020

  44. [46]

    Kamiya and C

    Y. Kamiya and C. D. Batista. Magnetic vortex crystals in frustrated mott insulator.Phys. Rev. X, 4:011023, Feb 2014

    work page 2014

  45. [47]

    Kanazawa, J.-H

    N. Kanazawa, J.-H. Kim, D. S. Inosov, J. S. White, N. Egetenmeyer, J. L. Gavilano, S. Ishiwata, Y. Onose, T. Arima, B. Keimer, and Y. Tokura. Possible skyrmion-lattice ground state in theb20chiral-lattice magnet mnge as seen via small-angle neutron scatter- ing.Phys. Rev. B, 86:134425, Oct 2012

    work page 2012

  46. [48]

    Kanazawa, Y

    N. Kanazawa, Y. Nii, X. X. Zhang, A. S. Mishchenko, G. De Filippis, F. Kagawa, Y. Iwasa, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura. Critical phenomena of emergent magnetic monopoles in a chiral magnet.Nature Communications, 7(1):11622, 2016

    work page 2016

  47. [49]

    Kanazawa, Y

    N. Kanazawa, Y. Onose, T. Arima, D. Okuyama, K. Ohoyama, S. Wakimoto, K. Kakurai, S. Ishiwata, and Y. Tokura. Large topological hall effect in a short- period helimagnet mnge.Phys. Rev. Lett., 106:156603, Apr 2011

    work page 2011

  48. [50]

    T. A. Kaplan and N. Menyuk. Spin ordering in three- dimensional crystals with strong competing exchange interactions.Philosophical Magazine, 87(25):3711–3785, September 2007

    work page 2007

  49. [51]

    Spin excitation spectra in helimagnetic states: Proper- screw, cycloid, vortex-crystal, and hedgehog lattices

    Yasuyuki Kato, Satoru Hayami, and Yukitoshi Motome. Spin excitation spectra in helimagnetic states: Proper- screw, cycloid, vortex-crystal, and hedgehog lattices. Phys. Rev. B, 104:224405, Dec 2021

    work page 2021

  50. [52]

    Hidden topolog- ical transitions in emergent magnetic monopole lattices

    Yasuyuki Kato and Yukitoshi Motome. Hidden topolog- ical transitions in emergent magnetic monopole lattices. Phys. Rev. B, 107:094437, Mar 2023

    work page 2023

  51. [53]

    Nanometric square skyrmion lattice in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet.Nature Nanotechnology, 15(6):444–449, 2020

    Nguyen Duy Khanh, Taro Nakajima, Xiuzhen Yu, Shang Gao, Kiyou Shibata, Max Hirschberger, Yuichi Yamasaki, Hajime Sagayama, Hironori Nakao, Licong Peng, Kiyomi Nakajima, Rina Takagi, Taka-hisa Arima, Yoshinori Tokura, and Shinichiro Seki. Nanometric square skyrmion lattice in a centrosymmetric tetragonal magnet.Nature Nanotechnology, 15(6):444–449, 2020

    work page 2020

  52. [54]

    P.R. Kotiuga. The algebraic topology of bloch points. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics, 25(5):3476–3478, 1989

    work page 1989

  53. [55]

    Lancaster, S

    T. Lancaster, S. J. Blundell, D. Prabhakaran, P. J. Baker, W. Hayes, and F. L. Pratt. Magnetism in the s= 1frustrated antiferromagnetGeni 2o4 studied using implanted muons.Phys. Rev. B, 73:184436, May 2006

    work page 2006

  54. [56]

    Lapa and Christopher L

    Matthew F. Lapa and Christopher L. Henley. Ground states of the classical antiferromagnet on the pyrochlore lattice, 2012

    work page 2012

  55. [57]

    J. C. Lashley, R. Stevens, M. K. Crawford, J. Boerio- Goates, B. F. Woodfield, Y. Qiu, J. W. Lynn, P. A. Goddard, and R. A. Fisher. Specific heat and magnetic susceptibility of the spinels geni2o4 and geco2o4.Phys. Rev. B, 78:104406, Sep 2008

    work page 2008

  56. [58]

    Magnetic bloch- point hopping in multilayer skyrmions and associated emergent electromagnetic signatures.Phys

    Yu Li, Sergiy Mankovsky, Svitlana Polesya, Hubert Ebert, and Christoforos Moutafis. Magnetic bloch- point hopping in multilayer skyrmions and associated emergent electromagnetic signatures.Phys. Rev. B, 104:L140409, Oct 2021

    work page 2021

  57. [59]

    Malomed, and Shenhe Fu

    Haolin Lin, Yixuan Liao, Guohua Liu, Jianbin Ren, Zhen Li, Zhenqiang Chen, Boris A. Malomed, and Shenhe Fu. Optical vortex-antivortex crystallization in free space.Nature Communications, 15(1):6178, 2024

    work page 2024

  58. [60]

    M. E. Lines. Magnetic properties of cocl 2 and nicl2. Phys. Rev., 131:546–555, Jul 1963

    work page 1963

  59. [61]

    Pseudospin ex- change interactions ind 7 cobalt compounds: Possible realizationofthekitaevmodel.Phys

    Huimei Liu and Giniyat Khaliullin. Pseudospin ex- change interactions ind 7 cobalt compounds: Possible realizationofthekitaevmodel.Phys. Rev. B,97:014407, Jan 2018

    work page 2018

  60. [62]

    Igor Luk’yanchuk, Anna Razumnaya, Svitlana Kon- dovych, Yurii Tikhonov, and Valerii M. Vinokur. Topo- logical ferroelectric chirality, 2024

    work page 2024

  61. [63]

    J. M. Luttinger and L. Tisza. Theory of dipole interac- tion in crystals.Phys. Rev., 70:954–964, Dec 1946

    work page 1946

  62. [64]

    Matsuda, J.-H

    M. Matsuda, J.-H. Chung, S. Park, T. J. Sato, K. Mat- suno, H. Aruga Katori, H. Takagi, K. Kakurai, K. Ka- mazawa, Y. Tsunoda, I. Kagomiya, C. L. Henley, and S.-H. Lee. Frustrated minority spins in geni2o4.Euro- physics Letters, 82(3):37006, apr 2008

    work page 2008

  63. [65]

    Magnetic- field-induced transitions in spinel geco2o4.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 80(3):034708, 2011

    Masaaki Matsuda, Takemichi Hoshi, Hiroko Aruga Ka- tori, Masashi Kosaka, and Hidenori Takagi. Magnetic- field-induced transitions in spinel geco2o4.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 80(3):034708, 2011

    work page 2011

  64. [66]

    Milde, D

    P. Milde, D. Köhler, J. Seidel, L. M. Eng, A. Bauer, A. Chacon, J. Kindervater, S. Mühlbauer, C. Pfleiderer, S. Buhrandt, C. Schütte, and A. Rosch. Unwinding of a skyrmion lattice by magnetic monopoles.Science, 340(6136):1076–1080, 2013

    work page 2013

  65. [67]

    Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet.Science, 323(5916):915–919, Feb 2009

    S Mühlbauer, B Binz, F Jonietz, C Pfleiderer, A Rosch, A Neubauer, R Georgii, and P Böni. Skyrmion lattice in a chiral magnet.Science, 323(5916):915–919, Feb 2009

    work page 2009

  66. [68]

    Niedoba and M

    H. Niedoba and M. Labrune. Magnetization reversal via bloch points nucleation in nanowires and dots: a micromagnetic study.The European Physical Journal B - Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, 47(4):467– 478, 2005

    work page 2005

  67. [69]

    Thz esr study of peculiar co pyrochlore system geco2o4 using pulsed high magnetic field.Applied Magnetic Resonance, 52(4):411– 424, 2021.https://link.springer.com/article/10

    Susumu Okubo, Hitoshi Ohta, Tatsuya Ijima, Tat- suya Yamazaki, Wei min Zhang, Shigeo Hara, Shinichi Ikeda, Hiroyuki Oshima, Miwako Takahashi, Keisuke Tomiyasu, and Tadataka Watanabe. Thz esr study of peculiar co pyrochlore system geco2o4 using pulsed high magnetic field.Applied Magnetic Resonance, 52(4):411– 424, 2021.https://link.springer.com/article/10....

    work page 2021

  68. [70]

    Multiple-qstates and the skyrmion lattice of the triangular-lattice heisenberg antiferromagnet under magnetic fields.Phys

    Tsuyoshi Okubo, Sungki Chung, and Hikaru Kawa- mura. Multiple-qstates and the skyrmion lattice of the triangular-lattice heisenberg antiferromagnet under magnetic fields.Phys. Rev. Lett., 108:017206, Jan 2012

    work page 2012

  69. [71]

    Magnetic hedgehog lattices in non- centrosymmetric metals.Phys

    Shun Okumura, Satoru Hayami, Yasuyuki Kato, and Yukitoshi Motome. Magnetic hedgehog lattices in non- centrosymmetric metals.Phys. Rev. B, 101:144416, Apr 2020

    work page 2020

  70. [72]

    Ollivier and H

    J. Ollivier and H. Mutka. In5 cold neutron time-of- flight spectrometer, prepared to tackle single crystal spectroscopy.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, (Suppl.B):SB003, 2011

    work page 2011

  71. [73]

    A M Paddison, G Ehlers, A

    J. A M Paddison, G Ehlers, A. B. Cairns, J. S Gard- ner, O. A. Petrenko, N. P. Butch, Khalyavin. D. D., P. Manuel, Fisher. H. E., A. L. Zhou. H. D. abd Good- win, and J. R. Stewart. Suppressed-moment 2-k order in the canonical frustrated antiferromagnet gd2ti2o7.npj Quantum Materials, 6:99, 2021

    work page 2021

  72. [74]

    Zero-temperature phases for chiral magnets in three dimensions.Phys

    Jin-Hong Park and Jung Hoon Han. Zero-temperature phases for chiral magnets in three dimensions.Phys. Rev. B, 83:184406, May 2011. 13

    work page 2011

  73. [75]

    Plumier.C.R

    R. Plumier.C.R. Acad. Sc. Ser.B, 264:278, 1967

    work page 1967

  74. [76]

    R. J. Plumier. Neutron diffraction study of helimag- netic spinel ZnCr2Se4.Journal of Applied Physics, 37(3):1395–1396, 1966

    work page 1966

  75. [77]

    Rabe, David Vanderbilt, Mohindar S

    Prativa Pramanik, Sobhit Singh, Mouli Roy Chowd- hury, Sayandeep Ghosh, Vasant Sathe, Karin M. Rabe, David Vanderbilt, Mohindar S. Seehra, and Subhash Thota. Lattice dynamics and magnetic exchange in- teractions ingeco 2o4: A spinel withs= 1 2 pyrochlore lattice.Phys. Rev. B, 104:014433, Jul 2021

    work page 2021

  76. [78]

    The new thermal-neutron diffractome- ter d23, Nov 1999

    E Ressouche, J Chiapusio, B Longuet, F Mantegazza, and J Flouquet. The new thermal-neutron diffractome- ter d23, Nov 1999

    work page 1999

  77. [79]

    Kitaev-heisenberg hamiltonian for high-spind7 mott in- sulators.Phys

    Ryoya Sano, Yasuyuki Kato, and Yukitoshi Motome. Kitaev-heisenberg hamiltonian for high-spind7 mott in- sulators.Phys. Rev. B, 97:014408, Jan 2018

    work page 2018

  78. [80]

    P. M. Sarte, M. Songvilay, E. Pachoud, R. A. Ewings, C. D. Frost, D. Prabhakaran, K. H. Hong, A. J. Browne, Z. Yamani, J. P. Attfield, E. E. Rodriguez, S. D. Wilson, and C. Stock. Spin-orbit excitons in coo.Phys. Rev. B, 100:075143, Aug 2019

    work page 2019

  79. [81]

    Dynamics and en- ergetics of emergent magnetic monopoles in chiral mag- nets.Phys

    Christoph Schütte and Achim Rosch. Dynamics and en- ergetics of emergent magnetic monopoles in chiral mag- nets.Phys. Rev. B, 90:174432, Nov 2014

    work page 2014

  80. [82]

    The accurate magnetic structure of ceal2 at various temperatures in the ordered state.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 20(13):135204, mar 2008

    J Schweizer, F Givord, J-X Boucherle, FBourdarot, and E Ressouche. The accurate magnetic structure of ceal2 at various temperatures in the ordered state.Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, 20(13):135204, mar 2008

    work page 2008

Showing first 80 references.