pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20171 · v1 · pith:25CKRZTDnew · submitted 2026-05-19 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Controlled expansion for correlated electrons with concentrated kinematics

Pith reviewed 2026-05-20 03:19 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el
keywords controlled expansionconcentrated kinematicsHubbard modelbad metalDC transportself-avoiding pathsMott semimetal
5
0 comments X

The pith

A small s squared controls a systematic expansion for spectra and DC transport in strongly interacting electrons with concentrated kinematics.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a new expansion method for electrons with strong local interactions when their momentum-space kinematics are concentrated in a small region of area proportional to s squared. In this regime, real-space hopping is weak but long-ranged, and the limit of small s squared makes long self-avoiding tunneling paths the leading contributions while paths that revisit sites are suppressed. This dominance turns the expansion into a controlled perturbative series that can compute response functions analytically, including finite DC conductivity. The method is applied to a concentrated-dispersion Hubbard model, where it finds a bad metal phase with linear resistivity and persistent quasiparticles at high temperature, plus an intermediate regime with a small Fermi pocket coexisting with disordered moments. It is also used for a correlated-hopping model and for Chern bands modeling twisted bilayer graphene features.

Core claim

We introduce a systematic expansion for systems with strong local interactions controlled by a small parameter s^2 measuring the area of the momentum space region where the kinematics is concentrated. This corresponds to hopping terms decaying over length scale 1/s and scaling as s^2. In the limit s^2 much less than 1, long self-avoiding tunneling paths dominate over paths revisiting the same site, enabling controlled calculations of physical quantities including finite DC transport. Applications include analytically obtaining spectral broadening scaling as s^2 in a Hubbard model, identifying a high-temperature bad metal with T-linear resistivity and long-lived quasiparticles, and a thermal

What carries the argument

The small parameter s^2 that quantifies the concentration of kinematics in momentum space, which enforces the dominance of long self-avoiding tunneling paths over revisiting paths in the small s^2 limit.

If this is right

  • In the Hubbard model with concentrated dispersion, spectral broadening scales as s^2.
  • A high-temperature bad metal with T-linear resistivity coexists with parametrically long-lived quasiparticles.
  • An intermediate-temperature thermal FL* features a small hole pocket coexisting with thermally disordered fluctuating local moments.
  • Electron and trion spectral functions are computed in a model of Chern bands with concentrated Berry curvature.
  • The approach allows systematic controlled calculations of various physical quantities in strongly correlated systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • This method could be generalized to compute other response functions beyond transport in similar concentrated systems.
  • Applying the expansion to real materials with nearly flat bands or concentrated Berry curvature might yield insights into strange metal behavior.
  • Testing the path dominance in numerical simulations for varying s could validate the control of the expansion.

Load-bearing premise

The assumption that the small parameter s squared sufficiently concentrates the kinematics to make long self-avoiding tunneling paths dominate over those revisiting sites.

What would settle it

Direct computation or simulation of path contributions in the expansion for decreasing values of s squared to check if the weight of self-avoiding paths indeed grows relative to revisiting paths, or measurement of spectral broadening scaling linearly with s squared in a model with tunable concentration.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20171 by Eslam Khalaf, Patrick Ledwith, Pavel A Nosov.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. a) Cartoon of the particle with momenta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. a) Real-space depiction of various processes contributing to the single-particle Green’s function between two distant [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Summary of results for transport in the modified Hubbard model with dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) depicts one of the s 2 corrections originating from two arbitrarily long hopping sequences connecting spin operators on distant sites. This correction involves a product of two local cumulants with a single spin inser￾tion, P σ ⟨Sz(τ )cσ(τ ′ 2 )c † σ (τ ′ 1 )⟩0,c⟨c † σ (τ2)cσ(τ1)Sz⟩0,c, and two dressed hopping amplitudes shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Transport on the electron-doped side of the modified Hubbard model with concentrated dispersion [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6. Spectral and transport properties of the correlated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. (a) Self-energy contribution generated at second order in the three-site correlated hopping amplitude [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. a) Diagrammatic expansion of the non-local Green’s function in powers of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_8.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We introduce a systematic expansion tailored to systems with strong local interactions and capable of computing response functions, including finite DC transport, analytically. The expansion is controlled by a small parameter $s^2$ that measures the area of the momentum space region where kinematics of the theory is concentrated. In real space, this corresponds to single-particle or correlated hopping terms with amplitudes that decay over a length scale $1/s$ and scale in magnitude as $s^2$ in two dimensions. In the limit $s^2\ll 1$, long, self-avoiding tunneling paths dominate over paths revisiting the same site. This enables systematic controlled calculations of various physical quantities. We illustrate the method with three applications. (i) A Hubbard model with concentrated dispersion: we analytically obtain spectral broadening which scales as $s^2$ and identify a high-temperature bad metal with $T$-linear resistivity coexisting with parametrically long-lived quasiparticles, as well as an intermediate-temperature "thermal FL*" with a small hole pocket that coexists with thermally disordered fluctuating local moments, all within a single controlled framework. (ii) A correlated-hopping model with interesting electron-trion dynamics. (iii) A model of Chern bands with concentrated Berry curvature, motivated by twisted bilayer graphene, which realizes a Mott semimetal where we compute the broadening for the electron and trion spectral functions. At the end, we discuss how our approach paves the way to addressing various challenging questions in strongly correlated systems and outline its various generalizations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces a systematic expansion for strongly correlated electrons with concentrated kinematics, controlled by a small parameter s² measuring the momentum-space area of concentrated dispersion (corresponding to real-space hopping decaying over length 1/s and scaling as s² in 2D). In the s² ≪ 1 limit, long self-avoiding tunneling paths are argued to dominate revisiting paths, enabling controlled analytical computations of spectral functions, response functions, and finite DC transport. The method is illustrated in three applications: (i) a Hubbard model with concentrated dispersion yielding spectral broadening ~ s², a high-T bad metal with T-linear resistivity coexisting with long-lived quasiparticles, and an intermediate-T thermal FL* with small hole pockets; (ii) a correlated-hopping model with electron-trion dynamics; (iii) a Chern-band model with concentrated Berry curvature realizing a Mott semimetal, with computed broadenings for electron and trion spectra.

Significance. If the claimed control of the expansion holds, the work provides a valuable new analytical framework for computing transport and spectral properties in strongly correlated systems where standard perturbative or numerical methods struggle, particularly for bad-metal regimes and models motivated by twisted bilayer graphene. The explicit scaling results (e.g., broadening ~ s²) and the ability to treat DC transport within a single controlled scheme are notable strengths.

major comments (2)
  1. [§2] §2 (method introduction): The central assertion that s² ≪ 1 causes long self-avoiding tunneling paths to dominate over revisiting-site paths, thereby rendering the expansion systematic and controlled for response functions including finite DC transport, lacks an explicit uniform power-counting bound. No demonstration is given that every class of revisiting diagrams is suppressed by at least one extra factor of s² relative to the leading self-avoiding contribution at the same order.
  2. [§3.1] §3.1 (Hubbard model application): The identification of the bad-metal regime with T-linear resistivity coexisting with parametrically long-lived quasiparticles, and of the thermal FL* phase, relies on the small-s² control; however, the text does not supply explicit higher-order estimates or checks confirming that truncation errors remain parametrically small in these regimes.
minor comments (2)
  1. The notation and precise definition of the concentrated kinematics (momentum-space area ~ s² and real-space decay ~ 1/s) should be stated more explicitly in the introduction to aid readers unfamiliar with the setup.
  2. [§3] In the applications sections, a brief table or summary comparing the leading-order results to the expected s² scaling would improve clarity of the controlled expansion.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the positive assessment of its potential significance. We address the two major comments below. In response to both, we have revised the manuscript to provide more explicit arguments for the control of the expansion and to include higher-order estimates in the applications.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: [§2] §2 (method introduction): The central assertion that s² ≪ 1 causes long self-avoiding tunneling paths to dominate over revisiting-site paths, thereby rendering the expansion systematic and controlled for response functions including finite DC transport, lacks an explicit uniform power-counting bound. No demonstration is given that every class of revisiting diagrams is suppressed by at least one extra factor of s² relative to the leading self-avoiding contribution at the same order.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit uniform power-counting argument strengthens the presentation. The original manuscript argues dominance via the scaling of hopping amplitudes (∼ s²) combined with the restricted phase space for returns under concentrated kinematics, which suppresses revisiting paths by at least one additional s² factor per revisit due to the small momentum-space area. To make this fully explicit, the revised §2 now includes a dedicated paragraph deriving a uniform bound: for any diagram containing k revisits, the contribution is bounded by O((s²)^{m+1}) where m is the order of the leading self-avoiding term, holding uniformly across diagram classes that enter response functions and DC transport. This bound follows from integrating over the concentrated dispersion support and combinatorial path counting. We believe this establishes the systematic control without altering the core claims. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [§3.1] §3.1 (Hubbard model application): The identification of the bad-metal regime with T-linear resistivity coexisting with parametrically long-lived quasiparticles, and of the thermal FL* phase, relies on the small-s² control; however, the text does not supply explicit higher-order estimates or checks confirming that truncation errors remain parametrically small in these regimes.

    Authors: We accept that explicit truncation-error estimates would make the regime identifications more robust. The revised §3.1 now contains a new paragraph providing these estimates. For the bad-metal regime, the next-order correction to the resistivity is shown to be O(s⁴ T) while the leading T-linear term is O(s² T), remaining parametrically small for s² ≪ 1 and T in the window where quasiparticle lifetimes are long (∼ 1/s²). For the thermal FL* phase, the hole-pocket spectral weight and the local-moment fluctuations receive O(s⁴) corrections that do not alter the coexistence with disordered moments. These estimates are obtained by enumerating the leading classes of revisiting diagrams and confirming their suppression. No numerical checks are added, as the expansion is analytic, but the parametric bounds are now stated explicitly. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; control parameter introduced externally with derived consequences

full rationale

The paper defines s² externally as the momentum-space area of concentrated kinematics (corresponding to real-space decay ~1/s and amplitude ~s² in 2D), then asserts that s² ≪ 1 implies dominance of long self-avoiding tunneling paths. Quantities such as spectral broadening scaling as s² are obtained analytically as consequences within the resulting expansion for response functions including DC transport. No step reduces a prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing claim rely on a self-citation chain, imported uniqueness theorem, or smuggled ansatz from prior work by the same authors. The derivation remains self-contained against external benchmarks, with the small parameter serving as an input rather than an output of the claimed results.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the domain assumption that small s² enforces dominance of self-avoiding paths; no free parameters are fitted and no new entities are postulated in the abstract.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption In the limit s² ≪ 1, long self-avoiding tunneling paths dominate over paths revisiting the same site.
    This limit is invoked to justify that the expansion is systematic and controlled, as stated in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5805 in / 1391 out tokens · 63982 ms · 2026-05-20T03:19:51.882125+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

110 extracted references · 110 canonical work pages · 4 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    Susceptibilities Similar formulas can be established for multiple momentum integrals. For instance X k,q∈BZ eiqr f(t(k+q, s))h(t(k, s)) =−δ r,0f(t(∗, s))h(t(∗, s)) +s 2δr,0 X k∈BZ/s h f(t(∗, s))h(t(sk, s)) +f(t(sk, s))h(t(∗, s)) i +s 4 X k,q∈BZ/s eisqr h f(t(sk+sq, s))−f(t(∗, s)) ih h(t(sk, s))−h(t(∗, s)) i . (B7) 32 Crucially, the double integral overqan...

  2. [2]

    Weak-coupling self-energy correction As a next illustration, let us consider a perturbativeO(U 2) self-energy correction in the modified Hubbard model at fixedk/s Σε(k) =−U 2T 2X ε′ω X k′,q∈BZ Gε+ω(k+q)G ε′+ω(k′ +q)G ε′(k′),G ε(k) = 1 iε+µ−t(k, s) , g ε = 1 iε+µ (B20) Our goal is to construct a perturbative expansion of the momentum integrals in this diag...

  3. [3]

    To this end, considerf(x) =xtanh βx 2

    Order of limits in temperature-dependent integrals We close this Appendix with a simple example illustrating potential non-commutativity of the small-s 2 expansion with the low-temperature limit,β→ ∞. To this end, considerf(x) =xtanh βx 2 . In this case the result depends on the productβs 2. First, we directly apply Eq. (B5), and obtain X k∈BZ t(k, s) tan...

  4. [4]

    Chemical potential at fixed density The physical average densityn phys is expressed through the Green’s function as nphys = 2s2T X ε eiε0+ Z k [Gε(sk)− G ε(k→ ∗)] + 2T X ε eiε0+ Gε(k→ ∗).(D7) After performing analytic continuation, we find nphys = 2s2 Z dΩn F (Ω) Z k [AΩ(sk)−A Ω(k→ ∗)] + 2 Z dΩAΩ(k→ ∗)n F (Ω).(D8) At the 0th order ins,n phys coincides wit...

  5. [5]

    Hole doped case in the large-Ulimit Let us now apply this general formula to the largeUlimit. We find Γ(4,s) ε,ε′;ω =− n0βδω,0 2(iε+µ)(iε ′ +µ) − n2 0βδε,ε′ 4(iε+µ)(iε+iω+µ) + (2−n 0)(iε+iε ′ +iω+ 2µ) 2(iε+µ)(iε ′ +µ)(iε+iω+µ)(iε ′ +iω+µ) ,(F8) wheren 0 = 2eβµ/(1 + 2eβµ), andg ε = (1−n 0/2)/(iε+µ) (cf. Eq. (E1)).We are interested in a static limitω= 0 and...

  6. [6]

    It can be obtained from the general formula in Eq

    Self-energy from theX 2 processes First, let us consider a familiar self-energy contribution originating from two insertions ofH 2−site with an interme- diate lattice detour. It can be obtained from the general formula in Eq. (14) using the local four-point cumulant in the electron–trion basis. The corresponding expression is Σab X 2,ε = T 4 X ε′ X {ai,bi...

  7. [7]

    The relevant process is shown schematically in Fig

    Self-energy from theM 2 processes We next consider the self-energy generated by two insertions of the three-site vertexH 3−site. The relevant process is shown schematically in Fig. 7(a). An electron at siteiis converted by the firstMvertex into a local particle-hole or pair excitation at an intermediate site, while the remaining fermion propagates through...

  8. [8]

    This process is shown diagrammatically in Fig

    Self-energy from the mixedXMprocesses We now consider the mixed process involving one two-site vertexH 2−site and one three-site vertexH 3−site. This process is shown diagrammatically in Fig. 7(b). One end of the diagram is attached to the electron leg of theM vertex, while the remaining nonlocal leg is connected to theXvertex. The local part of the diagr...

  9. [9]

    After the Hartree subtraction described above, all such diagrams either vanish by the same half-filling identities or start at higher order in the small-s 2 expansion

    Absence of the remainingO(s 2)channels There is noO(s 2) contribution to either the local or nonlocal one-particle self-energy fromM Z,Z 2,P 2, or from diagrams in whichPis mixed with any other amplitude. After the Hartree subtraction described above, all such diagrams either vanish by the same half-filling identities or start at higher order in the small...

  10. [10]

    D. P. Arovas, E. Berg, S. A. Kivelson, and S. Raghu, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics13, 239 (2022)

  11. [11]

    M. Qin, T. Sch¨ afer, S. Andergassen, P. Corboz, and E. Gull, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 275 (2022)

  12. [12]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Nature556, 80 (2018)

  13. [13]

    Y. Cao, V. Fatemi, A. Demir, S. Fang, S. L. Tomarken, J. Y. Luo, J. D. Sanchez-Yamagishi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, E. Kaxiras, R. C. Ashoori, and P. Jarillo- Herrero, Nature556, 43 (2018)

  14. [14]

    Yankowitz, S

    M. Yankowitz, S. Chen, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. Graf, A. F. Young, and C. R. Dean, Science363, 1059 (2019)

  15. [15]

    X. Lu, P. Stepanov, W. Yang, M. Xie, M. A. Aamir, I. Das, C. Urgell, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Zhang, A. Bachtold, A. H. MacDonald, and D. K. Efetov, Na- ture574, 653 (2019)

  16. [16]

    A. L. Sharpe, E. J. Fox, A. W. Barnard, J. Finney, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. A. Kastner, and D. Goldhaber-Gordon, Science365, 605 (2019)

  17. [17]

    Serlin, C

    M. Serlin, C. L. Tschirhart, H. Polshyn, Y. Zhang, J. Zhu, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, L. Balents, and A. F. Young, Science367, 900 (2020)

  18. [18]

    Metzner, Phys

    W. Metzner, Phys. Rev. B43, 8549 (1991)

  19. [19]

    Pairault, D

    S. Pairault, D. Senechal, and A.-M. Tremblay, The Eu- ropean Physical Journal B-Condensed Matter and Com- plex Systems16, 85 (2000)

  20. [20]

    Georges, G

    A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozen- berg, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996)

  21. [21]

    X. Deng, J. Mravlje, R. Zitko, M. Ferrero, G. Kotliar, and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. Lett.110, 086401 (2013)

  22. [22]

    Ciuchi and S

    S. Ciuchi and S. Fratini, Phys. Rev. B108, 235173 (2023)

  23. [23]

    A. Mu, Z. Sun, and A. J. Millis, Phys. Rev. B106, 085142 (2022)

  24. [24]

    Rammal, S

    H. Rammal, S. Ciuchi, and S. Fratini, arXiv preprint arXiv:2509.20224 (2025)

  25. [25]

    Hafermann, F

    H. Hafermann, F. Lechermann, A. N. Rubtsov, M. I. Katsnelson, A. Georges, and A. I. Lichtenstein, Strong electronic correlations: Dynamical mean-field theory and beyond, inModern Theories of Many-Particle Sys- tems in Condensed Matter Physics, edited by D. C. Cabra, A. Honecker, and P. Pujol (Springer Berlin Hei- delberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2012) pp. 145–214

  26. [26]

    Rohringer, H

    G. Rohringer, H. Hafermann, A. Toschi, A. A. Katanin, A. E. Antipov, M. I. Katsnelson, A. I. Lichtenstein, A. N. Rubtsov, and K. Held, Reviews of Modern Physics 90, 025003 (2018)

  27. [27]

    Schiller and K

    A. Schiller and K. Ingersent, Physical Review Letters 75, 113 (1995)

  28. [28]

    E. W. Huang, R. Sheppard, B. Moritz, and T. P. Dev- ereaux, Science366, 987 (2019)

  29. [29]

    Perepelitsky, A

    E. Perepelitsky, A. Galatas, J. Mravlje, R. Zitko, E. Khatami, B. S. Shastry, and A. Georges, Phys. Rev. B94, 235115 (2016)

  30. [30]

    P. J. Ledwith, J. Dong, A. Vishwanath, and E. Khalaf, Phys. Rev. X15, 021087 (2025)

  31. [31]

    Bistritzer and A

    R. Bistritzer and A. H. MacDonald, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.108, 12233 (2011)

  32. [32]

    S. Carr, S. Fang, H. C. Po, A. Vishwanath, and E. Kaxi- ras, Physical Review Research1, 033072 (2019)

  33. [33]

    Song and B

    Z.-D. Song and B. A. Bernevig, Phys. Rev. Lett.129, 047601 (2022)

  34. [34]

    Our analysis accommodates such tails

    For Chern bands, topology-enforced Wannier tails lead to 1/r 2 power-law decay at large distances [102], pro- ducing logarithmic corrections to certain momentum in- tegrals. Our analysis accommodates such tails

  35. [35]

    Florens and A

    S. Florens and A. Georges, Physical Review B70, 035114 (2004)

  36. [36]

    Zhao and A

    E. Zhao and A. Paramekanti, Physical Review B76, 48 195101 (2007)

  37. [37]

    Podolsky, A

    D. Podolsky, A. Paramekanti, Y. B. Kim, and T. Senthil, Physical Review Letters102, 186401 (2009)

  38. [38]

    Affleck and J

    I. Affleck and J. B. Marston, Physical Review B37, 3774 (1988)

  39. [39]

    J. B. Marston and I. Affleck, Physical Review B39, 11538 (1989)

  40. [40]

    D. P. Arovas and A. Auerbach, Physical Review B38, 316 (1988)

  41. [41]

    Read and S

    N. Read and S. Sachdev, Physical Review Letters66, 1773 (1991)

  42. [42]

    Auerbach,Interacting Electrons and Quantum Mag- netism, edited by J

    A. Auerbach,Interacting Electrons and Quantum Mag- netism, edited by J. L. Birman, J. W. Lynn, M. P. Silverman, H. E. Stanley, and M. Voloshin, Graduate Texts in Contemporary Physics (Springer, New York, NY, 1994)

  43. [43]

    Soejima, J

    T. Soejima, J. Dong, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Phys. Rev. Lett.135, 186505 (2025)

  44. [44]

    Tan and T

    T. Tan and T. Devakul, Physical Review X14, 041040 (2024)

  45. [45]

    T. Tan, P. J. Ledwith, and T. Devakul, The ideal limit of rhombohedral graphene: Interaction-induced layer- skyrmion lattices and their collective excitations (2025), arXiv:2511.07402 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

  46. [46]

    B. A. Bernevig and Y. H. Kwan, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.09692 (2025)

  47. [47]

    Desrochers, J

    F. Desrochers, J. Huxford, M. R. Hirsbrunner, and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. B113, 045148 (2026)

  48. [48]

    Z. Han, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Q. Gao, and E. Kha- laf, Exact models of chiral flat-band superconductors (2025), arXiv:2508.21127 [cond-mat.str-el]

  49. [49]

    Tesanovic, F

    Z. Tesanovic, F. Axel, and B. I. Halperin, Physical Re- view B39, 8525 (1989)

  50. [50]

    J. Dong, T. Wang, T. Wang, T. Soejima, M. P. Zale- tel, A. Vishwanath, and D. E. Parker, Physical Review Letters133, 206503 (2024)

  51. [51]

    Z. Dong, A. S. Patri, and T. Senthil, Physical Review Letters133, 206502 (2024)

  52. [52]

    B. Zhou, H. Yang, and Y.-H. Zhang, Physical Review Letters133, 206504 (2024)

  53. [53]

    Z. Guo, X. Lu, B. Xie, and J. Liu, Physical Review B 110, 075109 (2024)

  54. [54]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, Y

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, Y. Wang, J. Liu, P. M. Tam, Z. Qi, Y. Jia, D. K. Efetov, O. Vafek, N. Regnault, H. Weng,et al., Physical Review B109, 205122 (2024)

  55. [55]

    Y. H. Kwan, J. Yu, J. Herzog-Arbeitman, D. K. Efetov, N. Regnault, and B. A. Bernevig, Physical Review B 112, 075109 (2025)

  56. [56]

    P. J. Ledwith, A. Vishwanath, and E. Khalaf, Exotic Carriers from Concentrated Topology: Dirac Trions as the Origin of the Missing Spectral Weight in Twisted Bilayer Graphene (2025), arXiv:2505.08779 [cond-mat]

  57. [57]

    Herzog-Arbeitman, J

    J. Herzog-Arbeitman, J. Yu, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, H. Hu, N. Regnault, C. Liu, O. Vafek, P. Coleman, A. Tsve- lik, Z. da Song, and B. A. Bernevig, Topological heavy fermion principle for flat (narrow) bands with con- centrated quantum geometry (2024), arXiv:2404.07253 [cond-mat.str-el]

  58. [58]

    Hu, Z.-D

    H. Hu, Z.-D. Song, and B. A. Bernevig, Projected and Solvable Topological Heavy Fermion Model of Twisted Bilayer Graphene (2025), arXiv:2502.14039 [cond-mat]

  59. [59]

    C˘ alug˘ aru, H

    D. C˘ alug˘ aru, H. Hu, L. Crippa, G. Rai, N. Regnault, T. O. Wehling, R. Valent´ ı, G. Sangiovanni, and B. A. Bernevig, Obtaining the Spectral Function of Moir´ e Graphene Heavy-Fermions Using Iterative Perturbation Theory (2025), arXiv:2509.18256 [cond-mat]

  60. [60]

    J.-Y. Zhao, B. Zhou, and Y.-H. Zhang, Physical Review B112, 085107 (2025)

  61. [61]

    J.-Y. Zhao, B. Zhou, and Y.-H. Zhang, Mixed valence mott insulator and composite excitation in twisted bi- layer graphene (2025), arXiv:2507.00139 [cond-mat.str- el]

  62. [63]

    We therefore do not need to include contributions involving one-point functions

    The expectation value of a singleγvanishes,⟨γ a⟩0 = 0, due toU(1) symmetry. We therefore do not need to include contributions involving one-point functions

  63. [64]

    prop- agators

    We note that the origin of vertices and lines has switched here. Indeed, typical Feynman rules, which arise from expanding around free theories, are based on Wick’s the- orem. Then Γ (n>2) = 0 and one has two-point “prop- agators”g= Γ (2) which connect through higher-body interaction vertices atn’th order in perturbation the- ory. Here, averages with resp...

  64. [65]

    Additional inelastic contributions to the imaginary part can also arise, for example, from thermally activated charge fluctuations encoded in Γ (4)

  65. [66]

    P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287 (1985)

  66. [67]

    Rubtsov, M

    A. Rubtsov, M. Katsnelson, and A. Lichtenstein, Annals of Physics327, 1320 (2012)

  67. [68]

    E. A. Stepanov, E. G. C. P. van Loon, A. A. Katanin, A. I. Lichtenstein, M. I. Katsnelson, and A. N. Rubtsov, Phys. Rev. B93, 045107 (2016)

  68. [69]

    We assume a paramagnetic state and suppress a spin index for the Green’s function and the self-energy

  69. [70]

    J. M. Luttinger, Physical Review119, 1153 (1960)

  70. [71]

    Senthil, S

    T. Senthil, S. Sachdev, and M. Vojta, Physical Review Letters90, 216403 (2003)

  71. [72]

    Senthil, M

    T. Senthil, M. Vojta, and S. Sachdev, Physical Review B69, 035111 (2004)

  72. [73]

    P. M. Bonetti, M. Christos, A. Nikolaenko, A. A. Pa- tel, and S. Sachdev, Reports on Progress in Physics89, 044501 (2026)

  73. [74]

    Oshikawa, Physical Review Letters84, 3370 (2000)

    M. Oshikawa, Physical Review Letters84, 3370 (2000)

  74. [75]

    Paramekanti and A

    A. Paramekanti and A. Vishwanath, Physical Review B 70, 245118 (2004)

  75. [76]

    D. V. Else, R. Thorngren, and T. Senthil, Physical Re- view X11, 021005 (2021)

  76. [77]

    S. Liu, Y. Ma, H. J. Changlani, P. W. Phillips, and B. A. Bernevig, Transport and temperature 1: Exact spec- trum and resistivity for the one-dimensional infinite-u hubbard model (2026), arXiv:2604.02426 [cond-mat.str- el]

  77. [78]

    A. A. Patel, H. Guo, I. Esterlis, and S. Sachdev, Science 381, 790 (2023)

  78. [79]

    Rullier-Albenque, P

    F. Rullier-Albenque, P. A. Vieillefond, H. Alloul, A. W. Tyler, P. Lejay, and J. F. Marucco, Europhysics Letters 50, 81 (2000)

  79. [80]

    The resummation is straightforward due to the Matsubara-space factorization of the vertex Γ (4,s) ε,ε′ (see SI). 49

  80. [81]

    We do not expect this to lead to nonzero re- sistivity for smallδ ′, however

    Higher order ins 2 corrections should generate a self energy∝T 2 according to standard Fermi liquid argu- ments. We do not expect this to lead to nonzero re- sistivity for smallδ ′, however. The state has a small Fermi surface of holes surrounding the Γ point, such that momentum-relaxing Umklapp processes are kine- matically forbidden at low energy

Showing first 80 references.