pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.20810 · v1 · pith:BWOBQDLXnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 🌌 astro-ph.GA

Revisiting the mass metallicity relation and the fundamental metallicity relation of dwarf galaxies at cosmic noon with NIRISS

Xianlong He , Zihao Li , Xin Wang , Zheng Cai , Tucker Jones , Tommaso Treu , Benedetta Vulcani , Matthew A. Malkan
show 1 more author
Karl Glazebrook
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 03:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.GA
keywords mass-metallicity relationfundamental metallicity relationdwarf galaxieshigh-redshift galaxiesgas-phase metallicityJWST NIRISScosmic noonoutflow metal loading
0
0 comments X

The pith

The mass-metallicity relation maintains a constant slope of roughly 0.24 down to extremely low-mass galaxies at redshifts 1.1 to 3.4.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Astronomers used deep slitless spectroscopy from JWST to measure gas-phase metallicities in 183 dwarf galaxies at cosmic noon. They find that metallicity rises steadily with stellar mass and that the same slope holds across nearly four orders of magnitude in mass. Adding star formation rate as an extra variable does not tighten the relation or reduce scatter in the metallicities. The results agree with earlier smaller samples and point to a universal process that sets metallicity primarily through stellar mass even in the smallest early galaxies. Modeling suggests gas fraction overtakes outflow effects as the main regulator at the lowest masses.

Core claim

We extend the stellar-mass gas-phase metallicity relation at z = 1.1-3.4 down to the extremely low-mass regime using 183 galaxies with log(M*/M⊙) = 6.3-10.2. The derived MZR is in excellent agreement with previous results. The observed MZR slope β≃0.24±0.03 remains constant across nearly four orders of magnitude in stellar mass. Analytical modeling of the metal-loading factor of outflows indicates that at M*≲10^8M⊙, ζ_out becomes progressively less dominant than the gas fraction in regulating the MZR slope. We find no robust evidence for an additional SFR dependence beyond the MZR, nor any reduction in metallicity scatter when SFR is included.

What carries the argument

The stellar-mass gas-phase metallicity relation (MZR) and its test against an additional dependence on star formation rate that would constitute a fundamental metallicity relation (FMR).

If this is right

  • The MZR slope stays fixed from 10^6.3 to 10^10 solar masses, indicating consistent regulation across galaxy scales.
  • At stellar masses below 10^8 solar masses the gas fraction takes over from outflows as the main driver of the slope.
  • Metallicity scatter does not decrease when star formation rate is added, so the relation remains mass-only at current precision.
  • Systematic tests show that strong-line calibrations and star-formation history assumptions shift the slope by less than 1 sigma.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the constant slope continues to lower masses, it suggests metal retention efficiency adjusts in a mass-independent way at early times.
  • This pattern could be compared with local dwarf galaxies to test whether the same balance persists to the present day.
  • Larger samples with deeper spectra may eventually detect a weak star-formation-rate dependence that is masked by current noise.

Load-bearing premise

Different choices for converting emission lines to metallicities and for modeling galaxy star-formation histories do not hide a true extra dependence on star formation rate or change the measured slope beyond the quoted uncertainties.

What would settle it

A new sample at the same redshifts that shows a clearly different MZR slope or a statistically significant drop in metallicity scatter once star formation rate is included at fixed stellar mass.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.20810 by Benedetta Vulcani, Karl Glazebrook, Matthew A. Malkan, Tommaso Treu, Tucker Jones, Xianlong He, Xin Wang, Zheng Cai, Zihao Li.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Example data for one source (ID=02897) at redshift 𝑧 = 2.2155 with log(𝑀∗/𝑀⊙ ) = 8.132, including photometric (left) and spectroscopic (right) observations. The left two panels show the pseudo-color image consisting of 3 bands F115W, F150W, F200W from NIRISS pre-image, aligned with the corresponding dispersion direction of spectroscopy. The observational frame 2D NIRISS spectra in 3 bands of 2 dispersion G… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Representative O3:=[O iii] 𝜆5007/H𝛽 (left) and O2:=[O ii] 𝜆𝜆3727,29/H𝛽 (right) calibrations adopted in this work. The selected calibrations span local-analog (Bian et al. 2018), low-metallicity/high-excitation (Nakajima et al. 2022), cosmic-noon (Cataldi et al. 2025), and broad high-redshift empirical frameworks (Sanders et al. 2025; Chakraborty et al. 2025). Solid curves indicate the nominal metallicity r… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Three examples of stacked grism spectra for galaxies residing in similar mass bins at 3 redshift ranges (from top to bottom: 𝑧 ∈ [1.10, 1.54], [1.76, 2.32], [2.61, 3.43], respectively). In each panel, we mark the group ID (as defined in Tab. 1), redshift range, number of galaxies 𝑁𝑔𝑎𝑙, and corresponding mass range. For each set of spectra, the blue curves represent the median stacked spectrum, the cyan ban… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Metallicity estimates derived from different combinations of emission lines. Left: Line set at 𝑧 ∼ 1 using [OIII] and [SII] diagnostics. Right: Line set at 𝑧 ∼ 3 using [OII] and [OIII] diagnostics. As a baseline, the abscissa in both panels employs the full set of [OII], [OIII], and [SII] metallicity diagnostics where available. Circles represent individual galaxies, while stars indicate stacked spectra. M… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: SFR-𝑀∗ relation for our galaxy sample. The sample is divided into 3 redshift bins (according to their [O iii], H𝛽 detection in 3 filters of F115W, F150W, F200W), color-coded by purple, cyan, and orange, respectively. The stars mark the median value after mass binning. Three horizontal dotted lines marked the 3𝜎 H𝛽 flux limit for each filter at each redshift (detailed in Appendix A), below which there is ba… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: MZR measurements for the combined sample of star-forming field galaxies from NGDEEP (stars; this work) and GLASS-JWST (crosses; previous results from He et al. 2024). All individual galaxies (small dots) are divided into 3 redshift bins (purple, cyan, and orange), and further grouped into stellar-mass bins to obtain stacked metallicity measurements (large stars in the corresponding colors) in order t… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Outflow 𝜁out versus gas fraction 𝛼 · 𝜇gas as a function of 𝑀∗. Top: The solid lines show the gas fraction 𝛼𝜇gas for each bin at their median redshift 𝑧med (quoted from Tacconi et al. 2018). The filled stars (NGDEEP) and crosses (GLASS) show the calculated outflow 𝜁out following Eq. 4. All color and marker assignments here follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: MZR measurements inferred from the O3–O2 diagnostics using different metallicity calibrations. The four panels correspond to N22 ,Ca25 ,S25 ,Cha25 , respectively. All markers and line colours follow [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison of the MZR inferred using the five metallicity cal￾ibrations adopted in this work. To avoid overcrowding the figure and to complement [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Mass posterior distributions inferred under different SFH priors for 4 example dwarf galaxies. For comparison, five parametric models (Double Power Law, Exponential Decline, Constant, Delayed-𝜏, and Lognormal) and one non-parametric model (Continuity) are used. Each distribution shows the KDE of the posterior, where broader posteriors have lower peak heights. Most SFH models yield median stellar masses co… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Top: Comparison of inferred 𝑀∗ from 3 selected SFH models (Delayed-Tau, Exponential Decline, and Continuity), as well as the additional independent SED–fitting code Beagle, and the reference Double Power Law (DPL) model. The colored regions are the 2D KDE of the mass distribution (small dots), with red and blue contours enclosing the 68.3% (1𝜎 in 1D) and 39.3% (1𝜎 in 2D) of the volume, around the one-to-o… view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Comparison of MZR measurements derived using stellar masses estimated under different SFH models. The legend and plotting format are identical to those in the left panel of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: MZR measured by splitting the SFR into subsamples at 𝑧 ∼ 2 as an example, following the method proposed by Henry et al. (2021). The small and large pink dots represent low-SFR individual galaxies and stack results, respectively, while the green dots represent the high-SFR samples. The blue stars and the solid line are the results using all low- and high-SFR 𝑧 ∼ 2 galaxies, identical to those represented b… view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Linear projection of the 3-parameter scaling plane FMR, showing 12+log(O/H) as a function of 𝜇best := log(𝑀∗/𝑀⊙ ) − 𝑎best × log(SFR/𝑀⊙yr−1 ). The best coefficient of the SFR 𝑎best = 0.316 minimizes the observed scatter (the root mean square error, RMSE) relative to the pre￾dicted FMR, as presented in the inset panel. The best-fit FMR with fixed 𝑎 at minimum RMSE is shown as the black line, and the equatio… view at source ↗
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Left: the SFR–𝑀∗ relation of our sample, similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We extend the stellar-mass gas-phase metallicity relation (MZR) at $z = 1.1-3.4$ down to the extremely low-mass regime using 183 galaxies with $\log(M_*/M_\odot) = 6.3-10.2$, based on deep JWST/NIRISS slitless spectroscopy from the NGDEEP program. The derived MZR is in excellent agreement with our previous result from 50 galaxies in the GLASS-JWST sample, underscoring the robustness and universality of this relation. Together, these datasets constitute the largest sample of dwarf galaxies yet obtained with NIRISS. The observed MZR slope, $\beta\simeq0.24\pm0.03$, remains constant across nearly four orders of magnitude in stellar mass. Analytical modeling of the metal-loading factor of outflows ($\zeta_\textrm{out}$) indicates that, at $M_*\lesssim10^8M_\odot$, $\zeta_\textrm{out}$ becomes progressively less dominant than the gas fraction ($\mu_\textrm{gas}$) in regulating the MZR slope. Using this enlarged NIRISS sample, we further test the existence of the fundamental metallicity relation (FMR). We find no robust evidence for an additional SFR dependence beyond the MZR, nor any reduction in metallicity scatter when SFR is included. Examination of systematic uncertainties in \oh, $M_*$ and SFR suggests that the MZR slope ($\beta\sim0.22$) is robust, and that different assumptions about the strong-line calibrations or star-formation history (SFH) of the galaxies change the slope by less than 1-$\sigma$. At the current depth of the NIRISS data, evidence for an FMR among high-redshift dwarf galaxies remains inconclusive, highlighting the need for larger samples, and deeper observations.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 0 minor

Summary. The paper claims to extend the stellar-mass gas-phase metallicity relation (MZR) at z = 1.1-3.4 to low-mass dwarf galaxies using 183 galaxies from JWST/NIRISS data, finding a constant slope β ≃ 0.24 ± 0.03 across four orders of magnitude in stellar mass. Analytical modeling indicates gas fraction dominates over outflow metal-loading at low masses, and there is no robust evidence for an FMR with additional SFR dependence.

Significance. This enlarged sample strengthens the case for a universal MZR slope in high-redshift dwarfs and provides insights into the physical drivers of metallicity. The lack of FMR evidence at current depths suggests observational limits, motivating future deeper studies. The robustness across samples is a positive aspect.

major comments (3)
  1. The interpretation that ζ_out becomes progressively less dominant than μ_gas at M* ≲ 10^8 M⊙ is load-bearing for understanding the MZR slope regulation. The abstract references this modeling but does not provide the full equations or derivation details; please include the explicit formulas for ζ_out and how it is computed from the data.
  2. The claim of no robust evidence for additional SFR dependence (and no scatter reduction) is central but the test's sensitivity is not quantified. With uncertainties of ~0.2-0.3 dex, an injection-recovery test or power analysis should be added to show the minimum detectable FMR strength, as this directly impacts whether the MZR-alone model is preferred.
  3. Details on error propagation in the MZR fit, sample completeness, and exact analytical modeling of ζ_out versus μ_gas are limited. Expanding these in the main text would strengthen the soundness assessment.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each of the major comments below and have revised the paper accordingly to incorporate additional details and tests as suggested.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The interpretation that ζ_out becomes progressively less dominant than μ_gas at M* ≲ 10^8 M⊙ is load-bearing for understanding the MZR slope regulation. The abstract references this modeling but does not provide the full equations or derivation details; please include the explicit formulas for ζ_out and how it is computed from the data.

    Authors: We agree that providing the explicit formulas will improve clarity. In the revised manuscript, we will add a dedicated subsection or appendix detailing the analytical expressions for ζ_out and μ_gas, including how ζ_out is derived from the observed MZR slope β and the assumed gas fraction and yield parameters. This will make the modeling fully transparent. revision: yes

  2. Referee: The claim of no robust evidence for additional SFR dependence (and no scatter reduction) is central but the test's sensitivity is not quantified. With uncertainties of ~0.2-0.3 dex, an injection-recovery test or power analysis should be added to show the minimum detectable FMR strength, as this directly impacts whether the MZR-alone model is preferred.

    Authors: This is a valid point regarding the statistical power of our analysis. We will conduct an injection-recovery test in the revised version, injecting synthetic FMR signals of varying strengths into mock datasets matching our sample's size, mass range, and uncertainty levels (~0.2-0.3 dex). We will report the recovery fraction to quantify the minimum detectable FMR strength, thereby strengthening our conclusion that there is no robust evidence for an FMR. revision: yes

  3. Referee: Details on error propagation in the MZR fit, sample completeness, and exact analytical modeling of ζ_out versus μ_gas are limited. Expanding these in the main text would strengthen the soundness assessment.

    Authors: We will expand the relevant sections in the main text to provide more details on error propagation for the MZR fit (including how uncertainties in metallicity, stellar mass, and other parameters are propagated), a quantitative assessment of sample completeness based on the NGDEEP survey selection, and the exact steps in the analytical modeling of ζ_out relative to μ_gas. These expansions will address the concerns about soundness. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Observational MZR derivation is self-contained with no circular reductions

full rationale

The paper reports direct measurements of gas-phase metallicity and stellar mass from NIRISS slitless spectra for 183 galaxies at z=1.1-3.4, fitting the MZR slope β≈0.24±0.03 from these data. The FMR test is a statistical check for residual SFR dependence after the MZR fit, with no reduction in scatter reported. The analytical modeling of ζ_out is presented as an interpretive step to explain the low-mass behavior in terms of gas fraction dominance, but it does not redefine or force the observed slope or the non-detection of FMR; the central results remain independent of this model. Agreement with the prior GLASS-JWST sample is noted as consistency check rather than a load-bearing premise. No equations reduce the claimed relations to inputs by construction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is smuggled via self-citation. The derivation chain is therefore non-circular.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard astrophysical assumptions for deriving gas-phase metallicities from strong emission lines and on the representativeness of the NIRISS-selected sample at the current depth.

free parameters (2)
  • MZR slope β
    Fitted to the observed data across the mass range
  • metal-loading factor ζ_out parameters
    Introduced in analytical modeling to compare dominance with gas fraction μ_gas
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Strong-line calibrations accurately reflect gas-phase oxygen abundance
    Invoked when deriving O/H from NIRISS spectra
  • domain assumption Star-formation histories used for SFR estimates are appropriate for the sample
    Tested with variations but still required for the FMR check

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5903 in / 1594 out tokens · 89114 ms · 2026-05-21T03:58:50.541847+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages · 18 internal anchors

  1. [1]

    ApJ , year =

    Peter, Annika H G and Shapley, Alice E and Law, David R and Steidel, Charles C and Erb, Dawn K and Reddy, Naveen A and Pettini, Max , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  2. [2]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , year =

    Onodera, Masato and Daddi, Emanuele and Gobat, Raphael and Cappellari, Michele and Arimoto, N and Renzini, Alvio and Yamada, Yoshihiko and McCracken, H J and Mancini, Chiara and Capak, Peter L and Carollo, C Marcella and Cimatti, Andrea and Giavalisco, Mauro and Ilbert, Olivier and Kong, Xu and Lilly, Simon J and Motohara, K and Ohta, K and Sanders, David...

    work page

  3. [3]

    Falgarone, Edith and Verstraete, L and G Pineau des For. A. 2005 , volume =

    work page 2005

  4. [4]

    2021 , eprint =

    Vanzella, Eros and Castellano, Marco and Bergamini, Pietro and Meneghetti, Massimo and Zanella, Anita and Calura, F and Caminha, G B and Rosati, Piero and Cupani, G and Me. 2021 , eprint =

    work page 2021

  5. [5]

    MNRAS , year =

    Shen, Lu and Lemaux, Brian C and Lubin, Lori M and McKean, John and Miller, Neal A and Pelliccia, Debora and Fassnacht, Christopher D and Tomczak, Adam R and Wu 吳柏鋒, Po-Feng and Kocevski, Dale D and Gal, Roy and Hung, Denise and Squires, Gordon , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  6. [6]

    A simple model for molecular hydrogen chemistry coupled to radiation hydrodynamics

    Nickerson, Sarah and Teyssier, Romain and Rosdahl, Joakim , title =. eprint arXiv:1802.00445 , year =. 1802.00445 , eprinttype =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    MNRAS , year =

    Pontzen, Andrew and Tremmel, Michael and Roth, Nina and Peiris, Hiranya V and Saintonge, Amelie and Volonteri, Marta and Quinn, Tom and Governato, Fabio , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  8. [8]

    2021 , eprint =

    Chen, Geoff C F and Treu, Tommaso L and Fassnacht, Christopher D and Ragland, Sam and Schmidt, Thomas and Suyu, Sherry H , title =. 2021 , eprint =

    work page 2021

  9. [9]

    The Astronomical Journal , year =

    Zou, Hu and Zhou, Xu and Jiang, Zhao-Ji and Cui, Xiangqun and Gong, Xue-Fei and Hu, Jingyao and Kulesa, C A and Lawrence, Jon S and Liu, Genrong and Luong-Van, D M and Ma, Jun and Moore, A M and Pennypacker, C R and Qin, Weijia and Storey, J W V and Sun, Bo and Travouillon, T and Walker, C K and Wang, Jia-Li and Wang, Lifan and Wu, Zhenyu and Xia, Lirong ...

    work page

  10. [10]

    ApJ , year =

    Shen, Yue and Grier, Catherine J and Horne, Keith and Brandt, William Nielsen and Trump, Jonathan R and Hall, P B and Kinemuchi, K and Starkey, David and Schneider, Donald P and Ho, Luis C and Homayouni, Y and Li, Jennifer I-Hsiu and McGreer, Ian D and Peterson, B M and Bizyaev, Dmitry and Chen, Yuguang and Dawson, Kyle S and Eftekharzadeh, Sarah and Gree...

    work page

  11. [11]

    ApJ , year =

    Aniano, Gonzalo and Draine, Bruce T and Hunt, Leslie K and Sandstrom, Karin M and Calzetti, Daniela and Kennicutt, Robert C Jr and Dale, Daniel A and Galametz, Maud and Gordon, K D and Leroy, Adam K and Smith, John-David T and Roussel, H and Sauvage, Marc and Walter, Fabian and Armus, Lee and Bolatto, Alberto D and Boquien, M. ApJ , year =

    work page

  12. [12]

    eprint arXiv:1902.10713 , year =

    Stefanon, Mauro and Labb. eprint arXiv:1902.10713 , year =. 1902.10713 , eprinttype =

    work page arXiv 1902

  13. [13]

    ApJS , year =

    Shibuya, Takatoshi and Ouchi, Masami and Harikane, Yuichi , title =. ApJS , year =

    work page

  14. [14]

    ApJ , year =

    Yuan, Tiantian and Kewley, Lisa J and Swinbank, A Mark and Richard, Johan and Livermore, Rachael C , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  15. [15]

    Figuring Out Gas & Galaxies in Enzo (FOGGIE). I. Resolving Simulated Circumgalactic Absorption at 2 < z < 2.5

    Peeples, Molly S and Corlies, Lauren and Tumlinson, Jason and O'Shea, Brian W and Lehner, Nicolas and O'Meara, John M and Howk, J Christopher and Smith, Britton D and Wise, John H and Hummels, Cameron B , title =. eprint arXiv:1810.06566 , year =. 1810.06566 , eprinttype =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  16. [16]

    Pozzetti, Lucia and Bolzonella, Micol and Lamareille, Fabrice and Zamorani, G and Franzetti, P and Le F. A. 2007 , volume =

    work page 2007

  17. [17]

    MNRAS , year =

    Vogelsberger, Mark and Zavala, Jesus and Loeb, Abraham , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  18. [18]

    MNRAS , year =

    Scannapieco, Cecilia and Wadepuhl, M and Parry, O H and Navarro, Julio F and Jenkins, A and Springel, Volker and Teyssier, Romain and Carlson, E and Couchman, H M P and Crain, Robert A and Dalla Vecchia, Claudio and Frenk, Carlos S and Kobayashi, Chiaki and Monaco, Pierluigi and Monaco, P and Murante, G and Okamoto, Takashi and Quinn, T and Schaye, Joop a...

    work page

  19. [19]

    Carniani, Stefano and Marconi, Alessandro and Maiolino, Roberto and Balmaverde, B and Brusa, M and Cano Diaz, M and Cicone, C and Comastri, A and Cresci, Giovanni and Fiore, F and Feruglio, Chiara and La Franca, F and Mainieri, Vincenzo and Mannucci, Filippo and Nagao, Tohru and Netzer, H and Piconcelli, E and Risaliti, G and Schneider, Raffaella and Shem...

    work page 2015

  20. [20]

    2020 , eprint =

    Jung, Intae and Finkelstein, Steven L and Dickinson, Mark E and Hutchison, Taylor A and Larson, Rebecca L and Papovich, Casey John and Pentericci, Laura and Straughn, Amber N and Guo, Yicheng and Malhotra, Sangeeta and Rhoads, James E and Song, Mimi and Tilvi, Vithal and Wold, Isak , title =. 2020 , eprint =

    work page 2020

  21. [21]

    ApJ , year =

    Chiang, Yi-Kuan and Overzier, Roderik A and Gebhardt, Karl and Finkelstein, Steven L and Chiang, Chi-Ting and Hill, Gary J and Blanc, Guillermo A and Drory, Niv and Chonis, Taylor S and Zeimann, Gregory R and Hagen, Alex and Schneider, Donald P and Jogee, Shardha and Ciardullo, Robin and Gronwall, Caryl , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  22. [22]

    MNRAS , year =

    Arcelin, Bastien and Doux, Cyrille and Aubourg,. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  23. [23]

    ApJ , year =

    Hu, Weida and Wang, Jun-Xian and Zheng, Zhen-Ya and Malhotra, Sangeeta and Rhoads, James E and Infante, Leopoldo and Barrientos, L Felipe and Yang, Huan and Jiang, Chun-Yan and Kang, Wenyong and Perez, Lucia A and Wold, Isak and Hibon, Pascale and Jiang, Lin-Hua and Khostovan, Ali Ahmad and Valdes, Francisco and Walker, Alistair R and Galaz, Gaspar and Co...

    work page

  24. [24]

    Deviations from hydrostatic equilibrium in the circumgalactic medium: spinning hot haloes and accelerating flows

    Oppenheimer, Benjamin D , title =. eprint arXiv:1801.00788 , year =. 1801.00788 , eprinttype =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  25. [25]

    The Astrophysical Journal Letters , year =

    Schawinski, Kevin and Evans, Daniel A and Virani, Shanil and Megan Urry, C and Keel, William C and Natarajan, Priyamvada and Lintott, Chris J and Manning, Anna and Coppi, Paolo and Kaviraj, Sugata and Bamford, Steven P and J. The Astrophysical Journal Letters , year =

    work page

  26. [26]

    ApJS , year =

    Bell, Eric F and McIntosh, Daniel H and Katz, Neal S and Weinberg, Martin D , title =. ApJS , year =

    work page

  27. [27]

    The SINS/zC-SINF survey of z~2 galaxy kinematics: SINFONI adaptive optics-assisted data and kiloparsec-scale emission line properties

    F. eprint arXiv:1802.07276 , year =. 1802.07276 , eprinttype =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  28. [28]

    ApJ , year =

    Ito, Kei and Kashikawa, Nobunari and Toshikawa, Jun and Overzier, Roderik A and Tanaka, Masayuki and Kubo, Mariko and Shibuya, Takatoshi and Ishikawa, Shogo and Onoue, Masafusa and Uchiyama, Hisakazu and Liang, Yongming and Higuchi, Ryo and Martin, Crystal L and Lee, Chien-Hsiu and Komiyama, Yutaka and Huang, Song , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  29. [29]

    ApJ , year =

    Robaina, Aday R and Bell, Eric F and Skelton, Rosalind E and McIntosh, Daniel H and Somerville, Rachel S and Zheng, Xian Zhong and Rix, Hans-Walter and Bacon, David and Balogh, Michael L and Bresolin, Fabio and Barden, Marco and B. ApJ , year =

    work page

  30. [30]

    ApJ , year =

    Brooks, Alyson M and Zolotov, Adi , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  31. [31]

    Vistas in Astronomy , year =

    Guesten, Rolf and Mezger, P G , title =. Vistas in Astronomy , year =

    work page

  32. [32]

    ApJ , year =

    Moreno-Raya, Manuel E and Moll. ApJ , year =

    work page

  33. [33]

    MNRAS , year =

    Chisholm, John and Tremonti, Christy A and Leitherer, Claus , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  34. [34]

    MNRAS , year =

    Yates, Robert M and Henriques, Bruno M B and Thomas, Peter A and Kauffmann, Guinevere and Johansson, Jonas and White, Simon D M , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  35. [35]

    Grazian, Andrea and Fontana, Adriano and Moscardini, L and Salimbeni, Sara and Menci, N and Giallongo, Emanuele and de Santis, C and Gallozzi, S and Nonino, Mario and Cristiani, Stefano and Vanzella, Eros , title =. A. 2006 , volume =

    work page 2006

  36. [36]

    ApJ , year =

    Micheva, Genoveva and Oey, M S and Keenan, Ryan P and Jaskot, Anne E and James, Bethan L , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  37. [37]

    MNRAS , year =

    Wyithe, J Stuart B , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  38. [38]

    MNRAS , year =

    Sobral, David and Smail, Ian R and Best, Phillip N and Geach, James E and Matsuda, Yuichi and Stott, John P and Cirasuolo, Michele and Kurk, Jaron D , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  39. [39]

    ApJ , year =

    Choi, Jieun and Dotter, Aaron L and Conroy, Charlie and Ting, Yuan-Sen , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  40. [40]

    ApJ , year =

    de los Reyes, Mithi A C and Kennicutt, Robert C Jr , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  41. [41]

    Allen, Steven W and Evrard, August E and Mantz, Adam B , title =. ARA. 2011 , volume =

    work page 2011

  42. [42]

    ApJ , year =

    Chauke, Priscilla and Van der Wel, Arjen and Pacifici, Camilla and Bezanson, Rachel and Wu 吳柏鋒, Po-Feng and Gallazzi, Anna and Noeske, Kai G and Straatman, Caroline M S and Mu. ApJ , year =

    work page

  43. [43]

    MNRAS , year =

    McGee, S L and Bower, Richard G and Balogh, Michael L , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  44. [44]

    ApJS , year =

    Dopita, Michael A and Fischera, J. ApJS , year =

    work page

  45. [45]

    MNRAS , year =

    Roberts-Borsani, Guido W and Saintonge, Amelie , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  46. [46]

    eprint arXiv:1610.03066 , year =

    Kim, Ji-hoon and Agertz, Oscar and Teyssier, Romain and Butler, Michael J and Ceverino, Daniel and Choi, Jun-Hwan and Feldmann, Robert and Keller, Ben W and Lupi, Alessandro and Quinn, Thomas and Revaz, Yves and Wallace, Spencer and Gnedin, Nickolay Y and Leitner, Samuel N and Shen, Sijing and Smith, Britton D and Thompson, Robert and Turk, Matthew J and ...

    work page arXiv

  47. [47]

    ApJ , year =

    Hao, Cai-Na and Huang, Jia-Sheng and Xia, Xiao-Yang and Zheng, Xian Zhong and Jiang, Chun-Yan and Li, Cheng , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  48. [48]

    The Astronomical Journal , year =

    Quadri, Ryan F and Marchesini, Danilo and van Dokkum, Pieter G and Gawiser, Eric and Franx, Marijn and Lira, Paulina and Rudnick, Gregory H and Urry, C Megan and Maza, Jose and Kriek, Mariska T and Barrientos, L Felipe and Blanc, Guillermo A and Castander, Francisco Javier and Christlein, Daniel and Coppi, Paolo S and Hall, Patrick B and Herrera, David an...

    work page

  49. [49]

    Nature Astronomy , year =

    Jiang, Lin-Hua and Wang, Shu and Zhang, Bing and Kashikawa, Nobunari and Ho, Luis C and Cai, Zheng and Egami, Eiichi and Walth, Gregory L and Yang, Yi-Si and Zhang, Bin-Bin and Zhao, Hai Bin , title =. Nature Astronomy , year =

    work page

  50. [50]

    On a new and homogeneous metallicity scale for Galactic classical Cepheids - I. Physical parameters

    Proxauf, B and da Silva, R and Kovtyukh, V V and Bono, G and Inno, L and Lemasle, B and Pritchard, J and Przybilla, N and Storm, J and Urbaneja, Miguel A and Valenti, E and Bergemann, Maria and Buonanno, R and D'Orazi, V and Fabrizio, M and Ferraro, I and Fiorentino, G and Francois, P and Iannicola, G and Laney, C D and Kudritzki, Rolf-Peter and Matsunaga...

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  51. [51]

    MNRAS , year =

    Bowler, Rebecca A A and McLure, Ross J and Dunlop, James S and McLeod, Derek J and Stanway, Elizabeth R and Eldridge, John J and Jarvis, M J , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  52. [52]

    ApJ , year =

    Bian, Fu-Yan and Kewley, Lisa J and Dopita, Michael A and Juneau, St. ApJ , year =

    work page

  53. [53]

    ApJ , year =

    Leroy, Adam K and Usero, Antonio and Schruba, Andreas and Bigiel, Frank and Kruijssen, J M Diederik and Kepley, Amanda A and Blanc, Guillermo A and Bolatto, Alberto D and Cormier, Diane and Gallagher, Molly J and Hughes, Annie and Jim. ApJ , year =

    work page

  54. [54]

    MNRAS , year =

    Niemiec, Anna and Jullo, Eric and Giocoli, Carlo and Limousin, Marceau and Jauzac, Mathilde , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  55. [55]

    2020 , eprint =

    Smail, Ian R and Dudzeviciute, U and Stach, S M and Almaini, Omar and Birkin, J E and Chapman, Scott C and Chen, Chian-Chou and Geach, James E and Gullberg, Bitten and Hodge, Jacqueline A and Ikarashi, S and Ivison, R J and Scott, D and Simpson, Christine M and Swinbank, A Mark and Thomson, A P and Walter, Fabian and Wardlow, J L and van der Werf, Paul P ...

    work page 2020

  56. [56]

    MNRAS , year =

    Tempel, E and Tenjes, P , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  57. [57]

    ApJ , year =

    Simons, Raymond C and Kassin, Susan A and Weiner, Benjamin J and Faber, Sandra M and Trump, Jonathan R and Heckman, Timothy M and Koo, David C and Pacifici, Camilla and Primack, Joel R and Snyder, Gregory F and de la Vega, Alexander , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  58. [58]

    MNRAS , year =

    Calura, F and Gibson, Brad K and Michel-Dansac, Leo and Stinson, Gregory S and Cignoni, M and Dotter, Aaron L and Pilkington, K and House, E L and Brook, Chris B and Few, C G and Bailin, J and Couchman, H M P and Wadsley, James W , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  59. [59]

    ApJ , year =

    Lee, Khee-Gan and Hennawi, Joseph F and Stark, Casey W and Prochaska, J Xavier and White, Martin and Schlegel, David J and Eilers, Anna-Christina and Arinyo-i-Prats, Andreu and Suzuki, Nao and Croft, Rupert A C and Caputi, Karina I and Cassata, Paolo and Ilbert, Olivier and Garilli, Bianca and Koekemoer, Anton M and Le Brun, Vincent and Le F. ApJ , year =

    work page

  60. [60]

    MNRAS , year =

    De Lucia, Gabriella and Fontanot, Fabio and Wilman, David J and Monaco, Pierluigi , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  61. [61]

    ApJ , year =

    Rupke, David S N and Veilleux, Sylvain , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  62. [62]

    ApJ , year =

    Jiang, Ning and Zhou, Hong-Yan and Ho, Luis C and Yuan, Weimin and Wang, Ting-Gui and Dong, Xiao-Bo and Jiang, Peng and Ji, Tuo and Tian, Qiguo , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  63. [63]

    MNRAS , year =

    Chisholm, John and Tremonti, Christy A and Leitherer, Claus and Chen, Yan-Mei , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  64. [64]

    2017 , eprint =

    Gu, Meng and Conroy, Charlie and Law, David R and van Dokkum, Pieter G and Yan, Ren-Bin and Wake, David A and Bundy, Kevin and Merritt, Allison and Abraham, Roberto G and Zhang, Jielai and Bershady, Matthew A and Bizyaev, Dmitry and Brinkmann, Jonathan and Drory, Niv and Grabowski, Kathleen and Masters, Karen L and Pan, Kaike and Parejko, John and Weijman...

    work page 2017

  65. [65]

    MNRAS , year =

    Turner, Monica L and Schaye, Joop and Crain, Robert A and Theuns, Tom and Wendt, Martin , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  66. [66]

    Physical Review D , year =

    Feng, Yi and Li, Di and Zheng, Zheng and Tsai, Chao-Wei , title =. Physical Review D , year =

    work page

  67. [67]

    Zhou, Luwenjia and Elbaz, David and Franco, M and Magnelli, Benjamin and Schreiber, Corentin and Wang, Tao and Ciesla, Laure and Daddi, Emanuele and Dickinson, Mark E and Nagar, N and Magdis, Georgios E and Alexander, David M and B. A. 2020 , volume =

    work page 2020

  68. [68]

    ApJ , year =

    Man, Allison W S and Zirm, Andrew W and Toft, Sune , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  69. [69]

    Cimatti, Andrea and Mignoli, Marco and Daddi, Emanuele and Pozzetti, Lucia and Fontana, Adriano and Saracco, Paolo and Poli, F and Renzini, Alvio and Zamorani, G and Broadhurst, T and Cristiani, Stefano and D'Odorico, S and Giallongo, Emanuele and Gilmozzi, R and Menci, N , title =. A. 2002 , volume =

    work page 2002

  70. [70]

    ApJ , year =

    Schenker, Matthew A and Robertson, Brant E and Ellis, Richard S and Ono, Yoshiaki and McLure, Ross J and Dunlop, James S and Koekemoer, Anton M and Bowler, Rebecca A A and Ouchi, Masami and Curtis-Lake, Emma and Rogers, Alexander B and Schneider, Evan E and Charlot, St. ApJ , year =

    work page

  71. [71]

    ApJ , year =

    Johnson, Sean D and Chen, Hsiao-Wen and Mulchaey, John S and Schaye, Joop and Straka, Lorrie A , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  72. [72]

    ApJ , year =

    Shi, Ke and Huang, Yun and Lee, Kyoung-Soo and Toshikawa, Jun and Bowen, Kathryn N and Malavasi, Nicola and Lemaux, Brian C and Cucciati, Olga and Le F. ApJ , year =

    work page

  73. [73]

    eprint arXiv:1909.11681 , year =

    Prochaska, J Xavier and Macquart, Jean-Pierre and McQuinn, Matthew and Simha, Sunil and Shannon, Ryan M and Day, Cherie K and Marnoch, Lachlan and Ryder, Stuart and Deller, Adam and Bannister, Keith W and Bhandari, Shivani and Bordoloi, Rongmon and Bunton, John and Cho, Hyerin and Flynn, Chris and Mahony, Elizabeth K and Phillips, Chris and Qiu, Hao and T...

    work page arXiv 1909

  74. [74]

    Nature Astronomy , year =

    Jiang, Lin-Hua and Wu, Jin and Bian, Fu-Yan and Chiang, Yi-Kuan and Ho, Luis C and Shen, Yue and Zheng, Zhen-Ya and Bailey, John I and Blanc, Guillermo A and Crane, Jeffrey D and Fan, Xiaohui and Mateo, Mario L and Olszewski, Edward W and Oyarz. Nature Astronomy , year =

    work page

  75. [75]

    Ly$\alpha$ and UV Sizes of Green Pea Galaxies

    Yang, Huan and Malhotra, Sangeeta and Rhoads, James E and Leitherer, Claus and Wofford, Aida and Jiang, Tianxing and Wang, Jun-Xian , title =. eprint arXiv:1610.05767 , year =. 1610.05767 , eprinttype =

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  76. [76]

    MNRAS , year =

    Woo, Joanna and Dekel, Avishai and Faber, Sandra M and Koo, David C , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  77. [77]

    ApJ , year =

    Kepley, Amanda A and Leroy, Adam K and Frayer, David T and Usero, Antonio and Marvil, Josh and Walter, Fabian , title =. ApJ , year =

    work page

  78. [78]

    MNRAS , year =

    Liske, J and Baldry, Ivan K and Driver, S P and Tuffs, R J and Alpaslan, M and Andrae, E and Brough, Sarah and Cluver, M E and Grootes, M W and. MNRAS , year =

    work page

  79. [79]

    2021 , eprint =

    Fern. 2021 , eprint =

    work page 2021

  80. [80]

    MNRAS , year =

    Tsamis, Yiannis G and Barlow, M J and Liu, Xiao-Wei and Danziger, I J and Storey, P J , title =. MNRAS , year =

    work page

Showing first 80 references.