pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.21196 · v1 · pith:RA5T2PDXnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn · physics.ao-ph

Effect of grid anisotropy, resolution, and subgrid-scale models in pseudo-spectral Large Eddy Simulations of low-level clouds

Davide Selvatici , Richard J.A.M. Stevens This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-21 01:27 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.flu-dyn physics.ao-ph
keywords large-eddy simulationstratocumulus cloudssubgrid-scale modelgrid anisotropypseudo-spectral advectionAMD modelDYCOMS-IIASTEX
0
0 comments X

The pith

The AMD subgrid-scale model with pseudo-spectral advection yields accurate low-level cloud simulations across grid resolutions without parameter tuning.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper tests how grid resolution, anisotropy, and subgrid-scale modeling influence large-eddy simulations of low-level clouds. It pairs a pseudo-spectral advection scheme with the anisotropic minimum dissipation (AMD) model and benchmarks the results against observations from the DYCOMS-II RF01 and ASTEX field campaigns, covering both non-precipitating and precipitating stratocumulus regimes. The central result is that this combination produces consistent and accurate cloud statistics without needing case-by-case parameter adjustments, even when the grid is coarsened. The authors also identify a practical grid anisotropy, with vertical spacing roughly three times finer than horizontal spacing, that improves efficiency while preserving accuracy. Their error analysis of liquid water content and vertical velocity variance matches theoretical expectations and shows faster convergence on anisotropic grids.

Core claim

The AMD model combined with pseudo-spectral advection produces robust and accurate predictions across varying grid resolutions without parameter tuning. We identify a recommended grid anisotropy where vertical spacing is approximately three times finer than horizontal spacing, balancing accuracy and computational efficiency. An error analysis based on cloud liquid water content and vertical velocity variance reveals good agreement with theoretical predictions for isotropic grids, while grid anisotropy effectively improves convergence rates.

What carries the argument

The anisotropic minimum dissipation (AMD) subgrid-scale model paired with a pseudo-spectral advection scheme.

If this is right

  • Cloud statistics remain reliable even at coarser grid resolutions.
  • The suggested vertical-to-horizontal spacing ratio of approximately three reduces computational cost while maintaining accuracy.
  • Error metrics for liquid water content and velocity variance follow theoretical predictions on isotropic grids.
  • Anisotropic grids accelerate convergence relative to isotropic grids.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same combination could be tested on other marine boundary-layer regimes to check whether the lack of tuning generalizes beyond the two reference cases.
  • Adopting the recommended anisotropy in operational models might lower the cost of ensemble cloud simulations used for weather and climate forecasting.
  • If the AMD model continues to perform without retuning at even finer resolutions, it could support direct comparisons against direct numerical simulation benchmarks.

Load-bearing premise

That the DYCOMS-II RF01 and ASTEX field campaign observations serve as an unbiased reference that fully captures the essential unresolved processes, including precipitation effects.

What would settle it

If large discrepancies appear in cloud liquid water content or vertical velocity variance between the simulations and the reference campaigns when the recommended anisotropy is used across multiple resolutions, the claim of robustness without tuning would be falsified.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.21196 by Davide Selvatici, Richard J.A.M. Stevens.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Comparison of isotropic grids at different resolutions for the DYCOMS-II RF01 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Comparison of isotropic grids at different resolutions for the DYCOMS-II RF01 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Effect of grid anisotropy in the DYCOMS-II RF01 case. Panels (a), (b) use [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Comparison of AMD and Smagorinsky SGS models in the DYCOMS-II RF01 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Effect of grid anisotropy on numerical convergence for the DYCOMS-II RF01 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Computational aspects of simulations in the DYCOMS-II RF01 case. (a): Average [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Relative error of LWP (Equation 17) for the DYCOMS-II RF01 case. The relative [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_7.png] view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Effect of grid resolution in the ASTEX transition case. (a): LWP, (b): 30 min [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png] view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Comparison between the AMD and Smagorinsky model simulations for the AS [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_9.png] view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of (a) LWP, (b) vertical velocity variance, and (c) entrainment [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_10.png] view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Effect of smoothing the initial conditions in the DYCOMS-II RF01 case. Simu [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We investigate the effect due to grid resolution and subgrid-scale model on large-eddy simulations of low-level clouds using a novel framework that combines pseudo-spectral advection with the anisotropic minimum dissipation (AMD) subgrid-scale model. We use two field campaigns as reference, DYCOMS-II RF01 and ASTEX, which cover both non-precipitating and precipitating stratocumulus cloud regimes across different time scales. Our results demonstrate that the AMD model combined with pseudo-spectral advection produces robust and accurate predictions across varying grid resolutions without parameter tuning. We identify a recommended grid anisotropy where vertical spacing is approximately three times finer than horizontal spacing, balancing accuracy and computational efficiency. Finally, an error analysis based on cloud liquid water content and vertical velocity variance reveals good agreement with theoretical predictions for isotropic grids, while grid anisotropy effectively improves convergence rates.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript investigates the effects of grid resolution, anisotropy, and subgrid-scale models on pseudo-spectral large-eddy simulations of low-level clouds. It employs the anisotropic minimum dissipation (AMD) SGS model together with pseudo-spectral advection and validates results against DYCOMS-II RF01 (non-precipitating) and ASTEX (precipitating) field-campaign observations. The central claims are that AMD plus pseudo-spectral advection yields robust, accurate predictions across resolutions without parameter tuning, that a recommended anisotropy ratio (vertical spacing approximately three times finer than horizontal) balances accuracy and efficiency, and that an error analysis on cloud liquid water content and vertical velocity variance shows good agreement with theoretical scaling for isotropic grids while anisotropy improves convergence rates.

Significance. If the results hold, the work would supply practical guidance on grid design and SGS modeling for efficient, resolution-robust LES of stratocumulus clouds. It highlights potential advantages of combining pseudo-spectral advection with the AMD model and quantifies how controlled anisotropy can accelerate convergence, which could inform computational setups in atmospheric boundary-layer modeling.

major comments (3)
  1. Abstract and validation sections: the assertion of 'accurate predictions' and 'good agreement' with observations rests on mean-profile comparisons of liquid water content and vertical velocity variance, yet no error bars, overlap statistics, or propagated observational uncertainties from the DYCOMS-II and ASTEX campaigns are reported; this leaves the quantitative support for the central claim of accuracy incomplete.
  2. Abstract: the statement that results are obtained 'without parameter tuning' is in tension with the identification of a recommended grid anisotropy ratio, which is presented as a free parameter selected to optimize performance on the specific cases examined.
  3. ASTEX regime discussion: the robustness claim across regimes requires that the SGS model (or coupled microphysics) adequately represents unresolved precipitation processes, but the manuscript provides no explicit quantification or sensitivity test of how precipitation is handled at the subgrid scale in the ASTEX simulations.
minor comments (2)
  1. The methods section would benefit from explicit statements of data exclusion criteria and the precise definition of the anisotropy ratio (e.g., as an equation) to aid reproducibility.
  2. Figure captions and axis labels for the error-analysis plots could be expanded to include the exact convergence metrics and theoretical scaling relations being compared.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their insightful comments, which have helped us improve the clarity and rigor of our manuscript. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Abstract and validation sections: the assertion of 'accurate predictions' and 'good agreement' with observations rests on mean-profile comparisons of liquid water content and vertical velocity variance, yet no error bars, overlap statistics, or propagated observational uncertainties from the DYCOMS-II and ASTEX campaigns are reported; this leaves the quantitative support for the central claim of accuracy incomplete.

    Authors: We concur that including quantitative measures of uncertainty from the observations would strengthen our validation. We will revise the manuscript to include error bars based on the reported observational variabilities for liquid water content and vertical velocity variance in both DYCOMS-II RF01 and ASTEX cases. This will allow for a clearer assessment of agreement. revision: yes

  2. Referee: Abstract: the statement that results are obtained 'without parameter tuning' is in tension with the identification of a recommended grid anisotropy ratio, which is presented as a free parameter selected to optimize performance on the specific cases examined.

    Authors: The recommended grid anisotropy is a recommendation for grid design based on our findings, not a tunable parameter of the AMD model itself. The phrase 'without parameter tuning' specifically refers to the fact that the AMD model does not require case-specific adjustments to its coefficients, unlike some other SGS models. We will update the abstract to make this distinction explicit and clarify that the anisotropy ratio is chosen for optimal performance without altering model parameters. revision: yes

  3. Referee: ASTEX regime discussion: the robustness claim across regimes requires that the SGS model (or coupled microphysics) adequately represents unresolved precipitation processes, but the manuscript provides no explicit quantification or sensitivity test of how precipitation is handled at the subgrid scale in the ASTEX simulations.

    Authors: We agree that this is an important point for the robustness claim. Precipitation in our simulations is treated by the microphysics scheme, which operates on the resolved scales, while the AMD model handles subgrid turbulent fluxes. We did not perform dedicated sensitivity tests isolating subgrid precipitation effects. In the revision, we will add a discussion acknowledging this limitation and noting that the agreement with observations provides indirect support, but further tests could be valuable in future work. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; claims rest on external observational validation.

full rationale

The paper's core results—robustness of AMD + pseudo-spectral advection across resolutions without tuning, and a recommended anisotropy ratio—are obtained by running LES simulations and directly comparing outputs (cloud liquid water content, vertical velocity variance) to independent field-campaign data from DYCOMS-II RF01 and ASTEX. These benchmarks are external to the model setup and not derived from the same fitted parameters or self-citations. No equations or procedures in the provided text reduce a prediction to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise collapse to a self-citation chain. The analysis therefore remains self-contained against outside data rather than internally tautological.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard assumptions from fluid dynamics and the representativeness of the chosen observational datasets. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (1)
  • grid anisotropy ratio
    The suggested vertical-to-horizontal spacing ratio of approximately three is selected based on the performed simulations to optimize accuracy versus cost.
axioms (2)
  • standard math Pseudo-spectral advection accurately discretizes the transport terms in the governing equations for the simulated domain.
    Invoked as the foundation of the numerical framework in the abstract.
  • domain assumption The AMD subgrid-scale model sufficiently represents the effects of unresolved scales in both non-precipitating and precipitating stratocumulus regimes.
    Core modeling choice enabling the no-tuning claim.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5683 in / 1368 out tokens · 53389 ms · 2026-05-21T01:27:02.609246+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

300 extracted references · 300 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Abel, S. J. and Shipway, B. J. , year = 2007, journal =. A Comparison of Cloud-Resolving Model Simulations of Trade Wind Cumulus with Aircraft Observations Taken during

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    Abel, S. J. and Shipway, B. J. , year = 2007, journal =. A Comparison of Cloud-resolving Model Simulations of Trade Wind Cumulus with Aircraft Observations Taken during

    work page 2007

  3. [3]

    Energies , volume =

    The Effect of Free-Atmosphere Stratification on Boundary-Layer Flow and Power Output from Very Large Wind Farms , author =. Energies , volume =

    work page

  4. [4]

    Minimum-Dissipation Scalar Transport Model for Large-Eddy Simulation of Turbulent Flows , author =. Phys. Rev. Fluids , volume =

    work page

  5. [5]

    Wake Flow in a Wind Farm during a Diurnal Cycle , author =. J. Turbul. , volume =

    work page

  6. [6]

    Bound.-Layer Meteorol

    Large-Eddy Simulation of Thermally Stratified Atmospheric Boundary-Layer Flow Using a Minimum Dissipation Model , author =. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. , volume =

    work page

  7. [7]

    Abkar, Mahdi and. The. Energies , volume =

    work page

  8. [8]

    Journal of Turbulence , volume =

    Wake Flow in a Wind Farm during a Diurnal Cycle , author =. Journal of Turbulence , volume =

    work page

  9. [9]

    Abkar, Mahdi and Moin, Parviz , year = 2017, journal =. Large-

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Nature , volume =

    The Impact of Humidity above Stratiform Clouds on Indirect Aerosol Climate Forcing , author =. Nature , volume =

    work page

  11. [11]

    Large-Eddy Simulations of a Drizzling, Stratocumulus-Topped Marine Boundary Layer , author =. Mon. Weather Rev. , volume =

    work page

  12. [12]

    Ackerman, Andrew S. and. Large-. Mon. Weather Rev. , volume =

    work page

  13. [13]

    Sci Rep , volume =

    Accelerating Deployment of Offshore Wind Energy Alter Wind Climate and Reduce Future Power Generation Potentials , author =. Sci Rep , volume =

    work page

  14. [14]

    Sci Rep , volume =

    Impacts of Accelerating Deployment of Offshore Windfarms on Near-Surface Climate , author =. Sci Rep , volume =

    work page

  15. [15]

    Accelerating Deployment of Offshore Wind Energy Alter Wind Climate and Reduce Future Power Generation Potentials , author =. Sci. Rep. , volume =

    work page

  16. [16]

    Impacts of Accelerating Deployment of Offshore Windfarms on Near-Surface Climate , author =. Sci. Rep. , volume =

    work page

  17. [17]

    and Parlange, Marc B

    Albertson, John D. and Parlange, Marc B. , year = 1999, journal =. Surface Length Scales and Shear Stress:

    work page 1999

  18. [18]

    Large Eddy Simulation of Land-Atmosphere Interaction , author =

    work page

  19. [19]

    Albertson, J. D. and Parlange, M. B. , year = 1999, journal =. Surface Length Scales and Shear Stress:

    work page 1999

  20. [20]

    Albrecht, B. A. and Bretherton, C. S. and Johnson, D. and Scubert, W. H. and Frisch, A. S. , year = 1995, journal =. The

    work page 1995

  21. [21]

    Science , volume =

    Large-Scale Self-Organization in Dry Turbulent Atmospheres , author =. Science , volume =

    work page

  22. [22]

    arXiv , langid =:2411.08427 , primaryclass =

    Large-Scale Self-Organisation in Dry Turbulent Atmospheres , author =. arXiv , langid =:2411.08427 , primaryclass =

    work page arXiv

  23. [23]

    Observed Onshore Precipitation Changes after the Installation of Offshore Wind Farms , author =. Bull. of Atmos. Sci.& Technol. , volume =

    work page

  24. [24]

    Large Eddy Simulation of a Large Wind-Turbine Array in a Conventionally Neutral Atmospheric Boundary Layer , author =. Phys. Fluids , volume =

    work page

  25. [25]

    Large-Eddy Simulation of Wind Farms in Conventionally Neutral and Stable Atmospheric Boundary Layers , author =

    work page

  26. [26]

    Boundary-Layer Development and Gravity Waves in Conventionally Neutral Wind Farms , author =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =

    work page

  27. [27]

    Bound.-Layer Meteorol

    Gravity Waves and Wind-Farm Efficiency in Neutral and Stable Conditions , author =. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. , volume =

    work page

  28. [28]

    Sensitivity and Feedback of Wind-Farm-Induced Gravity Waves , author =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =

    work page

  29. [29]

    Bound.-Layer Meteorol

    Development of a Time--Height Profile Assimilation Technique for Large-Eddy Simulation , author =. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. , volume =

    work page

  30. [30]

    Allaerts, Dries and Meyers, Johan , year = 2018, journal =. Gravity

    work page 2018

  31. [31]

    Development of a

    Allaerts, Dries and Quon, Eliot and Draxl, Caroline and Churchfield, Matthew , year = 2020, journal =. Development of a

    work page 2020

  32. [32]

    Anthn, A A and Berger, A , langid =

    work page

  33. [33]

    and Cervone, Guido and Golbazi, Maryam and Al Fahel, Nicolas and Hultquist, Carolynne , year = 2020, journal =

    Archer, Cristina L. and Cervone, Guido and Golbazi, Maryam and Al Fahel, Nicolas and Hultquist, Carolynne , year = 2020, journal =. Changes in Air Quality and Human Mobility in the

    work page 2020

  34. [34]

    Impacts of Wind Farms on Surface Air Temperatures , author =. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. , volume =

    work page

  35. [35]

    Description of the

    Bak, Christian and Zahle, Frederik and Bitsche, Robert and Yde, Anders and Henriksen, Lars Christian and Nata, Anand , langid =. Description of the

    work page

  36. [36]

    and Zahle, F

    Bak, C. and Zahle, F. and Bitsche, R. and Kim, T. and Yde, A. and Henriksen, L. C. and Natarajan, A. and Hansen, M. , year = 2013, institution =. Description of the

    work page 2013

  37. [37]

    Comparison of

    Bangga, Galih , langid =. Comparison of

    work page

  38. [38]

    , year = 2018, journal =

    Bangga, G. , year = 2018, journal =. Comparison of Blade Element Method and

    work page 2018

  39. [39]

    Energy , volume =

    Aerodynamic Modeling of Wind Turbine Loads Exposed to Turbulent Inflow and Validation with Experimental Data , author =. Energy , volume =

    work page

  40. [40]

    On the Anelastic Formulation for a Compressible Atmosphere , author =. J. Atmos. Sci. , volume =

    work page

  41. [41]

    Inertial Oscillation Modelling of Low-Level Jets: An Application to the Complex Terrain and Double-Nosed Wind Profiles , shorttitle =

    Barbano, Francesco and Leo, Laura Sandra and Brogno, Luigi and Di Sabatino, Silvana , year = 2024, journal =. Inertial Oscillation Modelling of Low-Level Jets: An Application to the Complex Terrain and Double-Nosed Wind Profiles , shorttitle =

    work page 2024

  42. [42]

    Inertial Oscillation Modelling of Low-Level Jets: An Application to the Complex Terrain and Double-Nosed Wind Profiles , author =. Bull. Atmos. Sci. Technol. , volume =

    work page

  43. [43]

    and Wang, Y

    Barber, S. and Wang, Y. and Jafari, S. and Chokani, N. and Abhari, R. S. , year = 2011, journal =. The

    work page 2011

  44. [44]

    Barker, H. W. and Stephens, G. L. and Partain, P. T. and Bergman, J. W. and Bonnel, B. and Campana, K. and Clothiaux, E. E. and Clough, S. and Cusack, S. and Delamere, J. and Edwards, J. and Evans, K. F. and Fouquart, Y. and Freidenreich, S. and Galin, V. and Hou, Y. and Kato, S. and Li, J. and Mlawer, E. and Morcrette, J.-J. and O'Hirok, W. and R. Assess...

    work page

  45. [45]

    Barker, H. W. and Stephens, G. L. and Partain, P. T. and Bergman, J. W. and Bonnel, B. and Campana, K. and Clothiaux, E. E. and Clough, S. and Cusack, S. and Delamere, J. and Edwards, J. and Evans, K. F. and Fouquart, Y. and Freidenreich, S. and Galin, V. and Hou, Y. and Kato, S. and Li, J. and Mlawer, E. and Morcrette, J.-J. and O'Hirok, W. and R. Assess...

    work page

  46. [46]

    and Kishore, P

    Basha, G. and Kishore, P. and Ratnam, M. V. and Babu, S. Ravindra and Velicogna, I. and Jiang, J. H. and Ao, C. O. , year = 2019, journal =. Global Climatology of Planetary Boundary Layer Top Obtained from Multi-Satellite

    work page 2019

  47. [47]

    and Ratnam, M

    Basha, Ghouse and Kishore, P. and Ratnam, M. Venkat and Ravindra Babu, S. and Velicogna, Isabella and Jiang, Jonathan H. and Ao, Chi O. , year = 2019, journal =. Global Climatology of Planetary Boundary Layer Top Obtained from Multi-Satellite

    work page 2019

  48. [48]

    A Fast-Running Physics-Based Wake Model for a Semi-Infinite Wind Farm , author =. J. Fluid Mech. , volume =

    work page

  49. [49]

    Nature , volume =

    The Quiet Revolution of Numerical Weather Prediction , author =. Nature , volume =

    work page

  50. [50]

    Bound.-Layer Meteorol

    An Intercomparison of Large-Eddy Simulations of the Stable Boundary Layer , author =. Bound.-Layer Meteorol. , volume =

    work page

  51. [51]

    and Macvean, Malcolm K

    Beare, Robert J. and Macvean, Malcolm K. and Holtslag, Albert A. M. and Cuxart, Joan and Esau, Igor and Golaz, Jean-Christophe and Jimenez, Maria A. and Khairoutdinov, Marat and Kosovic, Branko and Lewellen, David and Lund, Thomas S. and Lundquist, Julie K. and Mccabe, Anne and Moene, Arnold F. and Noh, Yign and Raasch, Siegfried and Sullivan, Peter , yea...

    work page 2006

  52. [52]

    Renewable Energy , volume =

    Experimental Study on the Effect of Drop Size in Rain Erosion Test and on Lifetime Prediction of Wind Turbine Blades , author =. Renewable Energy , volume =

    work page

  53. [53]

    Experimental Study on the Effect of Drop Size in Rain Erosion Test and on Lifetime Prediction of Wind Turbine Blades , author =. Renew. Energy , volume =

    work page

  54. [54]

    Berger, A , langid =

    work page

  55. [55]

    Betz, Albert , langid =

    work page

  56. [56]

    Introduction to the Theory of Flow Machines , author =

    work page

  57. [57]

    and Schleussner, C.-F

    Bevacqua, E. and Schleussner, C.-F. and Zscheischler, J. , year = 2025, journal =. A Year above 1.5\,

    work page 2025

  58. [58]

    A Year above 1.5

    Bevacqua, Emanuele and Schleussner, Carl-Friedrich and Zscheischler, Jakob , year = 2025, journal =. A Year above 1.5

    work page 2025

  59. [59]

    Boundary Layer Wind Maxima and Their Significance for the Growth of Nocturnal Inversions , author =. Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. , volume =

    work page

  60. [60]

    , year = 1957, journal =

    Blackadar, Alfred K. , year = 1957, journal =. Boundary

    work page 1957

  61. [61]

    Blossey, P. N. and Bretherton, C. S. and Zhang, M. and Cheng, A. and Endo, S. and Heus, T. and Liu, Y. and Lock, A. P. and. Marine Low Cloud Sensitivity to an Idealized Climate Change:. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst. , volume =

    work page

  62. [62]

    and Bretherton, Christopher S

    Blossey, Peter N. and Bretherton, Christopher S. and Zhang, Minghua and Cheng, Anning and Endo, Satoshi and Heus, Thijs and Liu, Yangang and Lock, Adrian P. and De Roode, Stephan R. and Xu, Kuan-Man , year = 2013, journal =. Marine Low Cloud Sensitivity to an Idealized Climate Change:

    work page 2013

  63. [63]

    Fundamentals of Atmospheric Radiation , author =

    work page

  64. [64]

    and Clothiaux, Eugene E

    Bohren, Craig F. and Clothiaux, Eugene E. , year = 2006, series =. Fundamentals of Atmospheric Radiation: An Introduction with 400 Problems , shorttitle =

    work page 2006

  65. [65]

    Atmospheric Thermodynamics , author =

    work page

  66. [66]

    Bon, Thijs and Cal, Ra. Stable. Boundary-Layer Meteorol , volume =

    work page

  67. [67]

    and Cal, R

    Bon, T. and Cal, R. B. and Meyers, J. , year = 2024, journal =. Stable Boundary Layers with Subsidence:

    work page 2024

  68. [68]

    Climate Change and Terrestrial Ecosystem Modeling , author =

    work page

  69. [69]

    Bonan, Gordon , year = 2019, edition =. Climate

    work page 2019

  70. [70]

    Bortolotti, Pietro and Tarres, Helena Canet and Dykes, Katherine and Merz, Karl and Sethuraman, Latha and Verelst, David and Zahle, Frederik , langid =

    work page

  71. [71]

    Bortolotti, Pietro and Tarr

    work page

  72. [72]

    A Scale-Dependent. Phys. Fluids , volume =

    work page

  73. [73]

    Wind Turbine Aerodynamics and Vorticity-Based Methods , author =

    work page

  74. [74]

    Branlard, Emmanuel , year = 2017, series =. Wind

    work page 2017

  75. [75]

    and Pawlowska, H

    Brenguier, J.-L. and Pawlowska, H. and Sch. Radiative Properties of Boundary Layer Clouds:. J. Atmos. Sci. , volume =

    work page

  76. [76]

    Radiative

    Brenguier, Jean-Louis and Pawlowska, Hanna and Sch. Radiative. J. Atmos. Sci. , volume =

    work page

  77. [77]

    and Pincus, Robert , year = 1995, journal =

    Bretherton, Christopher S. and Pincus, Robert , year = 1995, journal =. Cloudiness and Marine Boundary Layer Dynamics in the

    work page 1995

  78. [78]

    An Intercomparison of Radiatively Driven Entrainment and Turbulence in a Smoke Cloud, as Simulated by Different Numerical Models , author =. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. , volume =

    work page

  79. [79]

    Bretherton, C. S. and Krueger, S. K. and Wyant, M. C. and Bechtold, P. and Meijgaard, E. V. and Stevens, B. and Teixeira, J. , year = 1999, journal =. A

    work page 1999

  80. [80]

    Bretherton, C. S. and Blossey, P. N. and Jones, C. R. , year = 2013, journal =. Mechanisms of Marine Low Cloud Sensitivity to Idealized Climate Perturbations:

    work page 2013

Showing first 80 references.