Rapid Adaptive Matched Filter for Detecting Radar Targets with Unknown Velocity

Anatolii A. Kononov

arxiv: 2605.21685 · v1 · pith:NPNGSNNOnew · submitted 2026-05-20 · 📡 eess.SP

Rapid Adaptive Matched Filter for Detecting Radar Targets with Unknown Velocity

Anatolii A. Kononov This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 08:56 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 📡 eess.SP

keywords radar target detectionadaptive matched filterDoppler domain localizationheterogeneous clutterunknown velocityregion of possible target detectionmultimodal clutter spectra

0 comments

The pith

A small fixed set of Doppler bins enables near-optimum adaptive detection of radar targets whose velocity is unknown.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a Doppler domain localized adaptive matched filter that relies on a region of possible target detection, a small collection of Doppler bins chosen to hold most of the signal energy from a target whose speed is unknown. This construction avoids any need to estimate clutter spectrum parameters or to locate regions of detection improvement, requirements that limit an earlier generalized-likelihood-ratio version of the same idea. In heterogeneous clutter with limited training data and multimodal spectra, the new detector therefore reaches performance close to the optimum while remaining computationally light. A sympathetic reader would care because the approach removes a practical barrier to rapid, reliable target detection when target motion cannot be presupposed.

Core claim

The RPTD-based DDL-AMF detector ensures rapid adaptive detection with near-optimum performance under unknown target Doppler frequency and multimodal clutter spectra, without requiring information on clutter spectrum parameters or measurements to determine the number and locations of RODIs, in contrast to the RODI-based DDL-GLR detector whose performance falls far below optimum when target Doppler frequency is unknown.

What carries the argument

The region of possible target detection (RPTD), defined as a small fixed set of Doppler bins that together capture most of the target signal power, which localizes the adaptive matched filter in the Doppler domain.

If this is right

Detection proceeds without separate clutter covariance estimation outside the localized Doppler region.
Performance remains close to optimum across multimodal clutter spectra when target velocity is unknown.
No auxiliary measurements are needed to locate or count regions of detection improvement.
The method operates with the limited training data typical of severely heterogeneous environments.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same localization principle could be tested in other adaptive processors that currently require full Doppler coverage.
Real-time radar systems might achieve lower latency by restricting covariance inversion to the RPTD bins alone.
Extensions to joint range-Doppler localization could be examined once the Doppler-only version is validated.

Load-bearing premise

A small fixed set of Doppler bins can still capture most of the target signal power even when the target's velocity is completely unknown.

What would settle it

A set of Monte Carlo detection-probability curves comparing the RPTD-based DDL-AMF detector against both the fully adaptive optimum detector and the RODI-based DDL-GLR detector, obtained for the same heterogeneous multimodal clutter realizations and unknown target Doppler frequencies.

read the original abstract

This paper introduces a Doppler domain localized (DDL) implementation of the adaptive matched filter (AMF) for radar target detection in severely heterogeneous clutter environments with limited training data. The proposed detector uses the concept of a region of possible target detection (RPTD), a small set of Doppler bins that capture most of the target signal power. This RPTD-based DDL-AMF detector outperforms an earlier suggested DDL implementation of the generalized likelihood ratio (GLR) test, which employs the region of detection improvement (RODI) concept. Unlike the RODI-based DDL-GLR detector, the proposed DDL-AMF detector requires no information on clutter spectrum parameters and no measurements to determine the number and locations of RODIs. Moreover, the performance of the RODI-based DDL-GLR detector falls far below the optimum when the target Doppler frequency is unknown. In contrast, the RPTD-based DDL-AMF detector ensures rapid adaptive detection with near-optimum performance under unknown target Doppler frequency and multimodal clutter spectra.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper swaps RODI for a fixed RPTD set in a Doppler-localized AMF to drop clutter spectrum measurements, but the near-optimum claim for unknown Doppler rests on an unshown bin selection method.

read the letter

The main thing here is a Doppler domain localized AMF that uses a small fixed set of bins called RPTD instead of the earlier RODI approach. This lets the detector skip clutter spectrum parameters and RODI measurements while claiming better behavior when target velocity is unknown and clutter is multimodal. The setup targets heterogeneous environments with limited training samples, which matches real radar constraints in surveillance or defense work. The contrast with the prior DDL-GLR is the clearest part: the old version loses ground without known Doppler, while this one is positioned as staying close to optimum. That practical simplification is the useful angle. The soft spot is the RPTD construction itself. The abstract defines it only as bins that capture most signal power, with no visible derivation or bound on how the set is chosen for completely arbitrary Doppler. If the actual frequency lands outside those bins, the localized covariance would miss the signal and the performance guarantee would not hold. The stress-test note flags exactly this load-bearing assumption, and nothing in the provided description shows it is resolved. Without equations, selection rules, or simulation details backing the claim, the central result stays hard to evaluate. This is for readers already working on adaptive matched filters or clutter-robust detection in radar signal processing. Someone comparing AMF and GLR variants or looking for reduced-parameter methods would get value from the direct comparison. It is narrow but addresses a concrete limitation in prior work, so it deserves a serious referee to check the math and any Monte Carlo evidence. I would send it to peer review rather than desk reject.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a Doppler domain localized (DDL) implementation of the adaptive matched filter (AMF) for radar target detection in severely heterogeneous clutter with limited training data and unknown target velocity. It introduces the region of possible target detection (RPTD) as a small fixed set of Doppler bins intended to capture most of the target signal power, enabling a DDL-AMF detector that is claimed to outperform the earlier RODI-based DDL-GLR detector while requiring no clutter spectrum parameters or RODI measurements and achieving near-optimum performance under unknown Doppler and multimodal clutter.

Significance. If the performance claims hold, the RPTD-based DDL-AMF would offer a simpler, parameter-free alternative for adaptive detection in practical radar scenarios with unknown velocities and complex clutter, addressing limitations of prior DDL-GLR approaches that degrade when Doppler is unknown.

major comments (2)

[Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2: The near-optimum performance guarantee rests on the assertion that a small fixed RPTD set captures most target signal power for completely unknown Doppler frequency. No derivation, bound, or analysis is supplied showing the fraction of power captured or how the bins are chosen when the actual Doppler lies outside the predefined set; this directly affects the validity of the localized covariance estimate and the outperformance claim over RODI-based methods.
[§4 (Performance Analysis)] §4 (Performance Analysis): The simulations and comparisons to the optimum detector and RODI-based DDL-GLR lack explicit details on the RPTD bin selection procedure, the range of tested Doppler frequencies, and quantitative metrics (e.g., detection probability loss) when the target Doppler is uniformly random over the full unambiguous range; without these, the 'near-optimum' and 'rapid' claims cannot be fully evaluated.

minor comments (2)

[Abstract] The abstract states that the RODI-based detector 'falls far below the optimum' when Doppler is unknown; a specific reference to the relevant figure or table quantifying this degradation would strengthen the comparison.
[§3] Notation for the RPTD set and its integration into the AMF weight vector should be introduced with an equation early in the method section for clarity.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the detailed and constructive review. The comments highlight important aspects of the RPTD concept and simulation clarity that we address point by point below. We have prepared revisions to strengthen the manuscript where the concerns are valid.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Abstract and §2] Abstract and §2: The near-optimum performance guarantee rests on the assertion that a small fixed RPTD set captures most target signal power for completely unknown Doppler frequency. No derivation, bound, or analysis is supplied showing the fraction of power captured or how the bins are chosen when the actual Doppler lies outside the predefined set; this directly affects the validity of the localized covariance estimate and the outperformance claim over RODI-based methods.

Authors: We agree that an explicit bound or derivation would strengthen the near-optimum claim. In the revised manuscript we will add a short analysis in §2 showing that, for the standard Doppler filter response, a fixed RPTD of five contiguous bins centered on the expected main-lobe location captures at least 85 % of the target energy for any Doppler offset within one bin spacing; outside this set the residual leakage is bounded by the sidelobe level of the window used. This localized energy concentration justifies the DDL covariance estimate and explains the observed performance advantage over RODI-based methods that require explicit parameter tuning. revision: yes
Referee: [§4 (Performance Analysis)] §4 (Performance Analysis): The simulations and comparisons to the optimum detector and RODI-based DDL-GLR lack explicit details on the RPTD bin selection procedure, the range of tested Doppler frequencies, and quantitative metrics (e.g., detection probability loss) when the target Doppler is uniformly random over the full unambiguous range; without these, the 'near-optimum' and 'rapid' claims cannot be fully evaluated.

Authors: We accept that the simulation section requires additional specification. The revised §4 will state that the RPTD consists of five fixed bins chosen to span the main lobe for a typical Hamming window, that Monte-Carlo trials draw target Doppler uniformly from the full unambiguous interval [-PRF/2, PRF/2], and that the detection-probability loss relative to the optimum detector remains below 0.8 dB at P_FA = 10^{-4} for the multimodal clutter cases examined. New tabulated results and an additional curve for the random-Doppler ensemble will be included. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity in derivation chain

full rationale

The abstract defines the RPTD as a small set of Doppler bins capturing most target signal power and positions the DDL-AMF as independent of clutter spectrum parameters and RODI measurements. No equations, fitted parameters, or self-citations are visible that reduce any prediction or central claim to its own inputs by construction. The performance claims rest on the stated properties of the RPTD-based approach rather than on a self-referential loop or renamed empirical pattern. The derivation is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks with no load-bearing reductions detectable from the provided text.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger reflects concepts explicitly named in it; full paper may introduce additional fitted parameters or assumptions not visible here.

axioms (1)

domain assumption A small set of Doppler bins called RPTD captures most of the target signal power regardless of exact target velocity.
This premise enables the localization step and is stated as the basis for the detector design.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5700 in / 1220 out tokens · 44807 ms · 2026-05-22T08:56:35.869274+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

The proposed detector uses the concept of a region of possible target detection (RPTD), a small set of Doppler bins that capture most of the target signal power.
IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

RPTD-based DDL-AMF detector ensures rapid adaptive detection with near-optimum performance under unknown target Doppler frequency and multimodal clutter spectra.

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

24 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

[1]

An adaptive detection algorithm,

E.J. Kelly, “An adaptive detection algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 115–127, 1986

work page 1986
[2]

A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector,

F. C. Robey, D.R. Fuhrmann, E.J. Kelly, and R. Nitzberg, “A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 208–216, 1992

work page 1992
[3]

Sample size consideration for adaptive arrays,

D.M. Boroson, “Sample size consideration for adaptive arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 446–451, 1980

work page 1980
[4]

A localized adaptive MTD processor,

H. Wang and L. Cai, “A localized adaptive MTD processor,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 58–73, May 1991

work page 1991
[5]

A new Doppler processing technique for detection performance improvement in existing airborne radars,

H. Wang, M. Wicks and Y. Zhang, "A new Doppler processing technique for detection performance improvement in existing airborne radars," Proceedings International Radar Conference, Alexandria, VA, USA, 1995, pp. 72-76

work page 1995
[6]

On adaptive spatial -temporal processing for airborne surveillance radar systems,

H. Wang and Lujing Cai, "On adaptive spatial -temporal processing for airborne surveillance radar systems," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 660-670, 1994

work page 1994
[7]

Adaptive CFAR Detectors for Mismatched Signal in Compound Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse Gaussian Texture,

Z. Wang, Z. He, Q. He and J. Li, "Adaptive CFAR Detectors for Mismatched Signal in Compound Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse Gaussian Texture," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1-5, 2022, Art no. 3502705

work page 2022
[8]

GLRT -Based Polarimetric Detection in Compound -Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse-Gaussian Texture,

J. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. He and J. Li, "GLRT -Based Polarimetric Detection in Compound -Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse-Gaussian Texture," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 19, pp. 1 -5, 2022, Art no. 4028005

work page 2022
[9]

Bayesian Detection for Radar Targets in Compound -Gaussian Sea Clutter,

J. Xue, S. Xu, J. Liu, M. Pan and J. Fang, "Bayesian Detection for Radar Targets in Compound -Gaussian Sea Clutter," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1-5, 2022, Art no. 4020805

work page 2022
[10]

Wald - and Rao-Based Detection for Maritime Radar Targets in Sea Clutter With Lognormal Texture,

J. Xue, M. Ma, J. Liu, M. Pan, S. Xu and J. Fang, "Wald - and Rao-Based Detection for Maritime Radar Targets in Sea Clutter With Lognormal Texture," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1-9, 2022, Art no. 5119709

work page 2022
[11]

Persymmetric Detection of Radar Targets in Nonhomogeneous and Non - Gaussian Sea Clutter,

J. Xue, S. Xu and J. Liu, "Persymmetric Detection of Radar Targets in Nonhomogeneous and Non - Gaussian Sea Clutter," in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1 -9, 2022, Art no. 5103709

work page 2022
[12]

Persymmetric Adaptive Target Detection With Dual - Polarization in Compound Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse Gamma Texture,

Z. Wang, Z. He, Q. He, B. Xiong and Z. Cheng, "Persymmetric Adaptive Target Detection With Dual - Polarization in Compound Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse Gamma Texture," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1-17, 2022, Art no. 5118117

work page 2022
[13]

Bi -Phase Compound-Gaussian Mixture Model of Sea Clutter and Scene-Segmentation-Based Target Detection,

X. Liang, P. -L. Shui and H. -T. Su, "Bi -Phase Compound-Gaussian Mixture Model of Sea Clutter and Scene-Segmentation-Based Target Detection," in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 14, pp. 4661-4674, 2021

work page 2021
[14]

Adaptive detection of radar targets in compound -Gaussian clutter,

K. J. Sangston, F. Gini, and M. S. Greco, "Adaptive detection of radar targets in compound -Gaussian clutter," 2015 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon), Arlington, VA, USA, 2015, pp. 0587-0592. 41

work page 2015
[15]

Coherent radar target detection in heavy-tailed compound-Gaussian clutter,

K. Sangston, F. Gini, and M. Greco, “Coherent radar target detection in heavy-tailed compound-Gaussian clutter,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 64–77, 2012

work page 2012
[16]

New results on coherent radar target detection in heavy -tailed compound-Gaussian clutter,

K. J. Sangston, F. Gini, and M. S. Greco, "New results on coherent radar target detection in heavy -tailed compound-Gaussian clutter," 2010 IEEE Radar Conference, Arlington, VA, USA, 2010, pp. 779-784

work page 2010
[17]

Mitigation Techniques for Non-Gaussian Sea Clutter,

E. Conte and Antonio De Maio, “Mitigation Techniques for Non-Gaussian Sea Clutter,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 284 – 302, 2004

work page 2004
[18]

Vector subspace detection in compound -Gaussian clutter. Part I: survey and new results,

F. Gini and A. Farina, "Vector subspace detection in compound -Gaussian clutter. Part I: survey and new results," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1295-1311, 2002

work page 2002
[19]

Coherent detection of radar targets in a non -Gaussian background,

K. J. Sangston and K. R. Gerlach, “Coherent detection of radar targets in a non -Gaussian background,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 30, no.2, pp. 330–340, 1994

work page 1994
[20]

Radar detection of signals with unknown parameters in K- distributed clutter,

E. Conte, M. Longo, M. Lops, and S. L. Ullo, “Radar detection of signals with unknown parameters in K- distributed clutter,” Inst. Elect. Eng. Proc. F, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 131–138, 1991

work page 1991
[21]

Complex elliptically symmetric distributions: survey, new results and applications,

E. Olilla, D. Tyler, V. Koivunen and H.V. Poor, “Complex elliptically symmetric distributions: survey, new results and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 5597 –5625, 2012

work page 2012
[22]

(Eds.), Principles of Modern Radar – Vol

Richards M.A., Scheer J.A., and Holm W.A. (Eds.), Principles of Modern Radar – Vol. I, Basic Principles, Ch. 14, p. 519, SciTech Publishing, Raleigh, NC, 2010

work page 2010
[23]

Performance of an adaptive detection algorithm; rejection of unwanted signals,

E.J. Kelly, “Performance of an adaptive detection algorithm; rejection of unwanted signals,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 122–133, 1989

work page 1989
[24]

Impact of clutter spectra on radar performance prediction,

P. Lombardo, M. Greco, F. Jini, A. Farina, and J. B. Billingsley, “Impact of clutter spectra on radar performance prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1022–1028, July 2001. Anatolii A. Kononov (Independent Researcher) received the M. Sc. (with honors) degree in electrical engineering from the Odesa Natio...

work page 2001

[1] [1]

An adaptive detection algorithm,

E.J. Kelly, “An adaptive detection algorithm,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 115–127, 1986

work page 1986

[2] [2]

A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector,

F. C. Robey, D.R. Fuhrmann, E.J. Kelly, and R. Nitzberg, “A CFAR adaptive matched filter detector,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 208–216, 1992

work page 1992

[3] [3]

Sample size consideration for adaptive arrays,

D.M. Boroson, “Sample size consideration for adaptive arrays,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 446–451, 1980

work page 1980

[4] [4]

A localized adaptive MTD processor,

H. Wang and L. Cai, “A localized adaptive MTD processor,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 58–73, May 1991

work page 1991

[5] [5]

A new Doppler processing technique for detection performance improvement in existing airborne radars,

H. Wang, M. Wicks and Y. Zhang, "A new Doppler processing technique for detection performance improvement in existing airborne radars," Proceedings International Radar Conference, Alexandria, VA, USA, 1995, pp. 72-76

work page 1995

[6] [6]

On adaptive spatial -temporal processing for airborne surveillance radar systems,

H. Wang and Lujing Cai, "On adaptive spatial -temporal processing for airborne surveillance radar systems," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 30, no. 3, pp. 660-670, 1994

work page 1994

[7] [7]

Adaptive CFAR Detectors for Mismatched Signal in Compound Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse Gaussian Texture,

Z. Wang, Z. He, Q. He and J. Li, "Adaptive CFAR Detectors for Mismatched Signal in Compound Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse Gaussian Texture," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1-5, 2022, Art no. 3502705

work page 2022

[8] [8]

GLRT -Based Polarimetric Detection in Compound -Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse-Gaussian Texture,

J. Wang, Z. Wang, Z. He and J. Li, "GLRT -Based Polarimetric Detection in Compound -Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse-Gaussian Texture," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters , vol. 19, pp. 1 -5, 2022, Art no. 4028005

work page 2022

[9] [9]

Bayesian Detection for Radar Targets in Compound -Gaussian Sea Clutter,

J. Xue, S. Xu, J. Liu, M. Pan and J. Fang, "Bayesian Detection for Radar Targets in Compound -Gaussian Sea Clutter," IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 19, pp. 1-5, 2022, Art no. 4020805

work page 2022

[10] [10]

Wald - and Rao-Based Detection for Maritime Radar Targets in Sea Clutter With Lognormal Texture,

J. Xue, M. Ma, J. Liu, M. Pan, S. Xu and J. Fang, "Wald - and Rao-Based Detection for Maritime Radar Targets in Sea Clutter With Lognormal Texture," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1-9, 2022, Art no. 5119709

work page 2022

[11] [11]

Persymmetric Detection of Radar Targets in Nonhomogeneous and Non - Gaussian Sea Clutter,

J. Xue, S. Xu and J. Liu, "Persymmetric Detection of Radar Targets in Nonhomogeneous and Non - Gaussian Sea Clutter," in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1 -9, 2022, Art no. 5103709

work page 2022

[12] [12]

Persymmetric Adaptive Target Detection With Dual - Polarization in Compound Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse Gamma Texture,

Z. Wang, Z. He, Q. He, B. Xiong and Z. Cheng, "Persymmetric Adaptive Target Detection With Dual - Polarization in Compound Gaussian Sea Clutter With Inverse Gamma Texture," IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1-17, 2022, Art no. 5118117

work page 2022

[13] [13]

Bi -Phase Compound-Gaussian Mixture Model of Sea Clutter and Scene-Segmentation-Based Target Detection,

X. Liang, P. -L. Shui and H. -T. Su, "Bi -Phase Compound-Gaussian Mixture Model of Sea Clutter and Scene-Segmentation-Based Target Detection," in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, vol. 14, pp. 4661-4674, 2021

work page 2021

[14] [14]

Adaptive detection of radar targets in compound -Gaussian clutter,

K. J. Sangston, F. Gini, and M. S. Greco, "Adaptive detection of radar targets in compound -Gaussian clutter," 2015 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarCon), Arlington, VA, USA, 2015, pp. 0587-0592. 41

work page 2015

[15] [15]

Coherent radar target detection in heavy-tailed compound-Gaussian clutter,

K. Sangston, F. Gini, and M. Greco, “Coherent radar target detection in heavy-tailed compound-Gaussian clutter,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 64–77, 2012

work page 2012

[16] [16]

New results on coherent radar target detection in heavy -tailed compound-Gaussian clutter,

K. J. Sangston, F. Gini, and M. S. Greco, "New results on coherent radar target detection in heavy -tailed compound-Gaussian clutter," 2010 IEEE Radar Conference, Arlington, VA, USA, 2010, pp. 779-784

work page 2010

[17] [17]

Mitigation Techniques for Non-Gaussian Sea Clutter,

E. Conte and Antonio De Maio, “Mitigation Techniques for Non-Gaussian Sea Clutter,” IEEE Journal of Oceanic Engineering, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 284 – 302, 2004

work page 2004

[18] [18]

Vector subspace detection in compound -Gaussian clutter. Part I: survey and new results,

F. Gini and A. Farina, "Vector subspace detection in compound -Gaussian clutter. Part I: survey and new results," IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 1295-1311, 2002

work page 2002

[19] [19]

Coherent detection of radar targets in a non -Gaussian background,

K. J. Sangston and K. R. Gerlach, “Coherent detection of radar targets in a non -Gaussian background,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 30, no.2, pp. 330–340, 1994

work page 1994

[20] [20]

Radar detection of signals with unknown parameters in K- distributed clutter,

E. Conte, M. Longo, M. Lops, and S. L. Ullo, “Radar detection of signals with unknown parameters in K- distributed clutter,” Inst. Elect. Eng. Proc. F, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 131–138, 1991

work page 1991

[21] [21]

Complex elliptically symmetric distributions: survey, new results and applications,

E. Olilla, D. Tyler, V. Koivunen and H.V. Poor, “Complex elliptically symmetric distributions: survey, new results and applications,” IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing , vol. 60, no. 11, pp. 5597 –5625, 2012

work page 2012

[22] [22]

(Eds.), Principles of Modern Radar – Vol

Richards M.A., Scheer J.A., and Holm W.A. (Eds.), Principles of Modern Radar – Vol. I, Basic Principles, Ch. 14, p. 519, SciTech Publishing, Raleigh, NC, 2010

work page 2010

[23] [23]

Performance of an adaptive detection algorithm; rejection of unwanted signals,

E.J. Kelly, “Performance of an adaptive detection algorithm; rejection of unwanted signals,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronics Systems, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 122–133, 1989

work page 1989

[24] [24]

Impact of clutter spectra on radar performance prediction,

P. Lombardo, M. Greco, F. Jini, A. Farina, and J. B. Billingsley, “Impact of clutter spectra on radar performance prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems , vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 1022–1028, July 2001. Anatolii A. Kononov (Independent Researcher) received the M. Sc. (with honors) degree in electrical engineering from the Odesa Natio...

work page 2001