pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22024 · v1 · pith:BXXTJJ3Onew · submitted 2026-05-21 · ⚛️ physics.app-ph

A Reciprocity-Based Signal Compensation Framework for Ultrasonic Backscatter Measurements in Heterogeneous Scattering Media

Wei Yi Yeoh , Bo Lan , Michael J. S. Lowe This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 02:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.app-ph
keywords ultrasonic backscatterreciprocitysignal compensationheterogeneous scattering mediaanisotropic materialsTi-6Al-4Vmicrostructural characterisationattenuation compensation
0
0 comments X

The pith

Reciprocity-based compensation removes shared depth bias from opposing ultrasonic backscatter profiles in heterogeneous anisotropic materials.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper develops a cross-directional method to compensate ultrasonic backscatter signals acquired from opposing faces of a sample. In materials with strong anisotropy and spatial heterogeneity, distance-dependent propagation effects can mask genuine microstructural variations with depth. The approach uses the reciprocal constraint that the dominant through-thickness bias shares a common component between the two directions, estimates a shared baseline via anchor-based fitting in the logarithmic amplitude domain, and subtracts it from the measured profiles. Demonstrated on macrozone-containing Ti-6Al-4V samples, the method reduces the mean standard deviation of the directional mismatch profile from 0.367 to 0.120 and the mean absolute fitted gradient from 0.171 to 0.0067 across six opposing-face pairs, outperforming conventional attenuation compensation while retaining local direction-dependent scattering information.

Core claim

The dominant through-thickness propagation bias in ultrasonic backscatter measurements contains a shared component between opposing inspection directions that can be isolated by anchor-based fitting in the logarithmic amplitude domain and used to compensate measured profiles, thereby reconciling opposing-face data without distorting genuine local microstructural scattering variations.

What carries the argument

The cross-directional compensation method, which isolates a shared distance-dependent baseline from opposing-face signals using anchor-based fitting in the log-amplitude domain and applies it to remove propagation bias.

If this is right

  • Opposing-face backscatter profiles become more consistent after compensation, with mean standard deviation of directional mismatch falling from 0.367 to 0.120.
  • The mean absolute fitted gradient of the mismatch profile drops from 0.171 to 0.0067.
  • The method outperforms conventional attenuation compensation on the tested Ti-6Al-4V samples.
  • Local direction-dependent scattering variations remain preserved in the compensated signals.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The approach could extend to other reciprocal wave measurements such as acoustic emission or seismic backscatter where opposing-path data are available.
  • It offers a route to improve depth-resolved microstructure maps in non-destructive evaluation of textured alloys.
  • A direct test would apply the compensation to synthetic data generated from known heterogeneous scattering models and check recovery of the input depth profile.

Load-bearing premise

The dominant through-thickness propagation bias contains a shared component between opposing inspection directions that can be isolated by anchor-based fitting without distorting genuine local microstructural scattering information.

What would settle it

Controlled experiments on samples with independently verified local scattering properties where the compensated opposing-face profiles still exhibit large residual mismatch or where known depth variations are altered after compensation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22024 by Bo Lan, Michael J. S. Lowe, Wei Yi Yeoh.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: EBSD images of the three orthogonal surfaces of the small- and big-MTR Ti–64 cubic specimen (10 × 10 mm area). The big-MTR sample contains macrozones with pancake-like geometries that are outlined for illustration. The colour code represents the grain orientations as depicted by the Inverse Pole Figure. Adapted from [17]. was used for signal acquisition at a sampling rate of 200 MHz, with 128 averages appl… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Normalised backscatter amplitude profiles measured from the big- and small-MTR samples, with each subplot representing one opposing-face pair. Pairs in (a), (c), and (d) show high profile agreement, pairs in (b) and (e) show moderate agreement, and pair (f) shows low agreement based on the near-field amplitude and fitted-gradient differences. or inspection direction, the backscatter amplitude decreases wit… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Frequency-dependent attenuation profiles for the (a) big- and (b) small-MTR samples, measured from all six faces. Solid and dashed lines indicate opposing faces within each face pair. attenuation profiles were estimated for all six inspection faces on the two Ti–64 samples using equation (1), with the resulting values averaged over the 120 × 120 spatial grid. The frequency-dependent attenuation profiles ar… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Attenuation-compensated backscatter RMS profiles for selected opposing-face pairs, with the second profile flipped into a common depth coordinate. Pairs with originally high profile agreement are shown in (a) and (c), while (b) and (d) have moderate and weak agreement, respectively. have similar amplitude levels and decay behaviour. Nevertheless, the compensation performance is not uniform, with the pair i… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Schematic illustration of two limitations of attenuation-based backscatter compensation in a material containing macrozones. (a) A non-uniform macrozone distribution causes opposing interrogation directions to encounter scattering regions in different orders, leading to direction-dependent backscatter profiles. (b) Elongated textured regions aligned with the propagation direction may produce coherent-wave … view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A workflow that outlines the methodology for the proposed cross-compensation strategy to reduce propagation￾related bias in backscatter measurements. However, this does not necessarily correspond to a proportional increase in backscattered energy. If the microstructural arrangement redirects only a limited fraction of energy back toward the receiver, the measured backscatter response may remain comparative… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Cross-compensated backscatter RMS profiles for selected opposing-face pairs, with the second profile flipped into a common depth coordinate. Pairs with originally high profile agreement are shown in (a) and (c), while (b) and (d) have moderate and weak agreement, respectively. To assess whether the method reduces the targeted monotonic bias beyond the initial big-MTR face 3–6 case, the same compensation pr… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Directional difference between logarithmic RMS backscatter profiles for selected opposing-face pairs, comparing the original, attenuation-compensated, and cross-compensated cases. Pairs with originally high profile agreement are shown in (a) and (c), while (b) and (d) have moderate and weak agreement, respectively. Conventional attenuation compensation reduces these values to 0.199 and 0.069, corresponding… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Heatmaps showing the variation of (a) amplitude difference and (b) absolute fitted-gradient difference for the six opposing-face signal pairs when the backscatter window length is varied from 1000 to 1800 time points. normalised amplitude difference and absolute fitted-gradient difference were recomputed for all six opposing-face pairs. Across the tested range, the maximum absolute changes are small, appro… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Volumetric reconstruction of backscatter hotspots obtained from big-MTR face 3–6 dataset: (a) original, (b) attenuation-compensated, and (c) cross-compensated. Blue and orange volumes correspond to hotspots detected from face 3 and face 6 inspections, respectively. Cross-directional compensation improves the spatial alignment of hotspots across the inspection volume, indicating reduced directional propaga… view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Ultrasonic backscatter measurements are widely used for microstructural characterisation. However, in materials containing strong anisotropy and spatial heterogeneity, the interpretation of backscatter signals becomes challenging because distance-dependent propagation effects can obscure genuine microstructural variations across depth. In this paper, a cross-directional compensation method is presented for ultrasonic backscatter measurements acquired from opposing inspection surfaces. The method exploits the reciprocal constraint that the dominant through-thickness propagation bias should contain a shared component between opposing inspection directions. A shared distance-dependent baseline is estimated in the logarithmic amplitude domain using an anchor-based fitting approach and subsequently used to compensate the measured backscatter profiles with depth. The method is demonstrated on two macrozone-containing Ti--6Al--4V samples, where conventional attenuation-based compensation is shown to be insufficient to consistently reconcile opposing-face backscatter profiles. Across six opposing-face signal pairs, the proposed method reduces the mean standard deviation of the directional mismatch profile from $0.367$ to $0.120$ and the mean absolute fitted gradient from $0.171$ to $0.0067$, outperforming conventional attenuation compensation. These results demonstrate that reciprocity-based compensation can reduce propagation-related bias while preserving local direction-dependent scattering variations, providing a practical signal-normalisation framework for backscatter analysis in heterogeneous anisotropic materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript presents a reciprocity-based signal compensation framework for ultrasonic backscatter measurements in heterogeneous scattering media. It proposes a cross-directional method that exploits the reciprocal constraint between opposing inspection directions to estimate and remove a shared distance-dependent propagation bias using anchor-based fitting in the logarithmic amplitude domain. Demonstrated on two macrozone-containing Ti-6Al-4V samples, the method reduces the mean standard deviation of the directional mismatch profile from 0.367 to 0.120 and the mean absolute fitted gradient from 0.171 to 0.0067 across six opposing-face signal pairs, outperforming conventional attenuation compensation while preserving local direction-dependent scattering variations.

Significance. If the central assumption holds, the framework offers a practical normalization approach for backscatter analysis in anisotropic heterogeneous materials, enabling more reliable interpretation of local microstructural variations by mitigating through-thickness propagation bias. The quantitative experimental results on real Ti-6Al-4V samples with macrozones provide concrete, falsifiable metrics of improvement over standard attenuation compensation, which is a strength for applied ultrasonics research.

major comments (1)
  1. [Cross-directional compensation method description] Cross-directional compensation method (anchor-based fitting description): The central claim that the shared baseline isolates the dominant propagation bias without distorting genuine local direction-dependent scattering information is load-bearing but not internally ruled out. In macrozone-containing Ti-6Al-4V, the fitting anchors could capture spatially varying backscatter from grain clusters rather than pure propagation; if so, the reported drops (std dev 0.367→0.120, gradient 0.171→0.0067) would partly reflect smoothing of real variations. The six-pair comparison alone does not address this risk via independent microstructural validation or sensitivity tests on anchor selection.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract: The reported metrics lack accompanying uncertainty estimates, number of independent measurements per pair, or details on how the shared baseline fit parameters were optimized, which would strengthen the quantitative claims.
  2. [Validation] Validation section: Conventional attenuation compensation is stated to be insufficient, but the specific attenuation model, frequency range, and implementation details used for comparison are not fully specified, hindering direct reproduction.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive feedback on our manuscript. Below we provide a point-by-point response to the single major comment, focusing on the technical substance of the concern.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: Cross-directional compensation method (anchor-based fitting description): The central claim that the shared baseline isolates the dominant propagation bias without distorting genuine local direction-dependent scattering information is load-bearing but not internally ruled out. In macrozone-containing Ti-6Al-4V, the fitting anchors could capture spatially varying backscatter from grain clusters rather than pure propagation; if so, the reported drops (std dev 0.367→0.120, gradient 0.171→0.0067) would partly reflect smoothing of real variations. The six-pair comparison alone does not address this risk via independent microstructural validation or sensitivity tests on anchor selection.

    Authors: The method is founded on the reciprocity principle for through-thickness propagation: attenuation, diffraction, and other path-dependent effects are identical for opposing directions along the same material path and therefore appear as a shared baseline in the log-amplitude domain. Local scattering from macrozones is direction-dependent because grain orientations relative to the incident wave differ when the inspection direction is reversed; these contributions are therefore not reciprocal and remain as deviations from the fitted baseline. The anchor-based fit is constructed to capture only the common monotonic trend, leaving direction-specific fluctuations intact. The experimental results show that after compensation the directional mismatch is reduced while local peaks and troughs that differ between the two faces are retained, which would not occur if genuine scattering variations were being removed. The six independent opposing-face pairs constitute repeated tests of this separation on real macrozone-containing material. We acknowledge that correlation with independent microstructural maps (e.g., EBSD) would constitute additional supporting evidence, but the internal consistency of the reciprocity argument together with the quantitative improvement over conventional attenuation compensation already addresses the risk of over-smoothing. revision: no

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; derivation remains self-contained

full rationale

The paper presents a reciprocity-based compensation method that estimates a shared distance-dependent baseline via anchor-based fitting in the log-amplitude domain and applies it to opposing-face backscatter profiles. Validation metrics (mean standard deviation of directional mismatch reduced from 0.367 to 0.120, mean absolute fitted gradient from 0.171 to 0.0067) are computed directly on the post-compensation experimental profiles from six opposing-face pairs in Ti-6Al-4V samples and compared against conventional attenuation compensation. No load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs, fitted parameters, or self-citation chains; the fitting serves as a practical normalization step whose outcome is independently assessed on real data without the metrics being tautological residuals of the fit itself. The central empirical claim therefore retains independent content.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

1 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests primarily on the domain assumption of a shared propagation bias and the practical fitting procedure; no new physical entities are introduced and the free parameter is the fitted baseline itself.

free parameters (1)
  • Shared baseline fit parameters
    Estimated via anchor-based fitting in the logarithmic amplitude domain to capture the common distance-dependent propagation bias.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption The dominant through-thickness propagation bias contains a shared component between opposing inspection directions.
    This reciprocity constraint underpins the estimation of the common baseline used for compensation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5761 in / 1379 out tokens · 50518 ms · 2026-05-22T02:45:49.613925+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

31 extracted references · 31 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Discretedislocationandcrystalplasticityanalysesofloadsheddinginpolycrystalline titanium alloys.International Journal of Plasticity, 87(September):15–31, 2016

    ZebangZheng,DanielS.Balint,andFionnP.E.Dunne. Discretedislocationandcrystalplasticityanalysesofloadsheddinginpolycrystalline titanium alloys.International Journal of Plasticity, 87(September):15–31, 2016. ISSN 07496419. doi: 10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.08.009

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.08.009 2016

  2. [2]

    Predictingdwellfatiguelifeintitanium alloys using modelling and experiment.Nature Communications, 11(1):1–13, 2020

    YilunXu,SudhaJoseph,PhaniKaramched,KateFox,DavidRugg,FionnP.E.Dunne,andDavidDye. Predictingdwellfatiguelifeintitanium alloys using modelling and experiment.Nature Communications, 11(1):1–13, 2020. ISSN 20411723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-19470-w

    work page doi:10.1038/s41467-020-19470-w 2020

  3. [3]

    Recentdevelopmentsincolddwellfatigueof titanium alloys for aero-engine applications: a review.Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 20:469–484, 9 2022

    ZhihongWu,HongchaoKou,NanaChen,ZhichengXi,JiangkunFan,BinTang,andJinshanLi. Recentdevelopmentsincolddwellfatigueof titanium alloys for aero-engine applications: a review.Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 20:469–484, 9 2022. ISSN 22387854. doi: 10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.094. 15

    work page doi:10.1016/j.jmrt.2022.07.094 2022

  4. [4]

    Huang, P

    M. Huang, P. Huthwaite, S. I. Rokhlin, and M. J. S. Lowe. Finite-element and semi-analytical study of elastic wave propagation in strongly scattering polycrystals.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 478, 2022. ISSN 14712946. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2021.0850

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2021.0850 2022

  5. [5]

    Kalkowski, Ming Huang, Michael J.S

    Yuan Liu, Michał K. Kalkowski, Ming Huang, Michael J.S. Lowe, Vykintas Samaitis, Vaidotas Cic˙enas, and Andreas Schumm. Can ultrasound attenuation measurement be used to characterise grain statistics in castings?Ultrasonics, 115, 2021. ISSN 0041624X. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106441

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106441 2021

  6. [6]

    Rodríguez, Heriberto Granados Becerra, and Jin-Yeon Kim

    Alberto Ruiz, Vania M. Rodríguez, Heriberto Granados Becerra, and Jin-Yeon Kim. Ultrasonic characterization of microstructural changes due to static recrystallization and grain growth in inconel 625 and inconel 718 superalloys.Ultrasonics, 142:107383, 2024. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107383

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2024.107383 2024

  7. [7]

    Experimentalandcomputationalstudiesofultrasoundwavepropagationinhexagonalclose-packed polycrystals for texture detection.Acta Materialia, 63:107–122, 2014

    BLan,M.J.S.Lowe,andF.P.E.Dunne. Experimentalandcomputationalstudiesofultrasoundwavepropagationinhexagonalclose-packed polycrystals for texture detection.Acta Materialia, 63:107–122, 2014. ISSN 1359-6454. doi: 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.012

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat.2013.10.012 2014

  8. [8]

    Ben Britton, Tea-Sung Jun, Weimin Gan, Michael Hofmann, Fionn P.E

    Bo Lan, T. Ben Britton, Tea-Sung Jun, Weimin Gan, Michael Hofmann, Fionn P.E. Dunne, and Michael J.S. Lowe. Direct volumetric measurementofcrystallographictextureusingacousticwaves.Acta Materialia,159:384–394,2018. ISSN13596454. doi:10.1016/j.actamat. 2018.08.037

    work page doi:10.1016/j.actamat 2018

  9. [9]

    Modeling Ultrasonic Microstructural Noise in Titanium Alloys

    F J Margetan and R B Thompson. Modeling Ultrasonic Microstructural Noise in Titanium Alloys. InReview of Progress in Quantitative Nondestructive Evaluation, volume 12, pages 1735–1742, 1993

    work page 1993

  10. [10]

    BackscatteredMicrostructuralNoiseinUltrasonicToneburstInspections.Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 13(3):111–136, 1994

    F.J.Margetan,R.B.Thompson,andI.Yalda-Mooshabad. BackscatteredMicrostructuralNoiseinUltrasonicToneburstInspections.Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 13(3):111–136, 1994. ISSN 1573-4862. doi: 10.1007/BF00728250

    work page doi:10.1007/bf00728250 1994

  11. [11]

    Nagy, and Peter Cawley

    Yuan Liu, Anton Van Pamel, Peter B. Nagy, and Peter Cawley. Investigation of ultrasonic backscatter using three-dimensional finite element simulations.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(3):1584–1595, 2019. ISSN 0001-4966. doi: 10.1121/1.5094783

    work page doi:10.1121/1.5094783 2019

  12. [12]

    Turner, Yongfeng Song, and Xiongbing Li

    Yangguang Bu, Xiling Liu, Joseph A. Turner, Yongfeng Song, and Xiongbing Li. Grain size evaluation with time-frequency ultrasonic backscatter.NDT & E International, 117:102369, 2021. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102369

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2020.102369 2021

  13. [13]

    Metallicmaterialmicrostructuregrainsizemeasurementsfrombackscatteredultrasonicarraydata using full matrix capture.NDT & E International, 149:103251, 2025

    WeiWang,JieZhang,andPaulD.Wilcox. Metallicmaterialmicrostructuregrainsizemeasurementsfrombackscatteredultrasonicarraydata using full matrix capture.NDT & E International, 149:103251, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103251

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ndteint.2024.103251 2025

  14. [14]

    Ultrasonicbackscatteringmethodforcharacterizingthenon-uniformmicrostructure of polycrystals.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 259:110831, 2025

    BohanLiu,MingHuang,DehanZhang,andXudongYu. Ultrasonicbackscatteringmethodforcharacterizingthenon-uniformmicrostructure of polycrystals.International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 259:110831, 2025. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110831

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2025.110831 2025

  15. [15]

    M. A. Cuddihy, A. Stapleton, S. Williams, and F. P.E. Dunne. On cold dwell facet fatigue in titanium alloy aero-engine components. International Journal of Fatigue, 97:177–189, 2017. ISSN 01421123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.034

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2016.11.034 2017

  16. [16]

    The Mechanistic Link between Macrozones (MTRs) and Dwell Fatigue in Titanium Alloys.International Journal of Fatigue, 142(September 2020):105971, 2021

    Yang Liu and Fionn P E Dunne. The Mechanistic Link between Macrozones (MTRs) and Dwell Fatigue in Titanium Alloys.International Journal of Fatigue, 142(September 2020):105971, 2021. ISSN 0142-1123. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105971

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2020.105971 2020

  17. [17]

    W. Y. Yeoh, B. Lan, and M. J. S. Lowe. Investigation of the influence of macrozones in titanium alloys on the propagation and scattering of ultrasound.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 479, 9 2023. ISSN 1364-5021. doi: 10.1098/rspa.2023.0176. URLhttps://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2023.0176

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2023.0176 2023

  18. [18]

    O. I. Lobkis, L. Yang, J. Li, and S. I. Rokhlin. Directional ultrasonic backscattering in polycrystals with elongated grains.AIP Conference Proceedings, 1430(31):1389–1396, 2012. ISSN 0094243X. doi: 10.1063/1.4716379

    work page doi:10.1063/1.4716379 2012

  19. [19]

    L. Yang, J. Li, and S. I. Rokhlin. Ultrasonic scattering in polycrystals with orientation clusters of orthorhombic crystallites.Wave Motion, 50 (8):1283–1302, 2013. ISSN 01652125. doi: 10.1016/j.wavemoti.2013.06.003

    work page doi:10.1016/j.wavemoti.2013.06.003 2013

  20. [20]

    Pilchak, Jia Li, and Stanislav I

    Adam L. Pilchak, Jia Li, and Stanislav I. Rokhlin. Quantitative comparison of microtexture in near-alpha titanium measured by ultrasonic scattering and electron backscatter diffraction.Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A: Physical Metallurgy and Materials Science, 45 (10):4679–4697, 2014. ISSN 10735623. doi: 10.1007/s11661-014-2367-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s11661-014-2367-1 2014

  21. [21]

    S. I. Rokhlin, G. Sha, J. Li, and A. L. Pilchak. Inversion methodology for ultrasonic characterization of polycrystals with clusters of preferentially oriented grains.Ultrasonics, 115(March), 2021. ISSN 0041624X. doi: 10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106433

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2021.106433 2021

  22. [22]

    W. Y. Yeoh, B. Lan, and M. J. S. Lowe. Representative microstructures for two-dimensional computational studies of ultrasonic wave propagationintitaniumalloys.Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences,481(2323):20240776,

    work page

  23. [23]

    doi: 10.1098/rspa.2024.0776

    work page doi:10.1098/rspa.2024.0776 2024

  24. [24]

    Rogers and A

    Peter H. Rogers and A. L. Van Buren. An exact expression for the Lommel-diffraction correction integral.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 55(4):724–728, 1974. ISSN 0001-4966. doi: 10.1121/1.1914589

    work page doi:10.1121/1.1914589 1974

  25. [25]

    Ultrasonic Attenuation Due to Grain Boundary Scattering in Pure Niobium.Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 29:93–103, 2010

    Fei Zeng, Sean R Agnew, Babak Raeisinia, and Ganapati R Myneni. Ultrasonic Attenuation Due to Grain Boundary Scattering in Pure Niobium.Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 29:93–103, 2010. doi: 10.1007/s10921-010-0068-2

    work page doi:10.1007/s10921-010-0068-2 2010

  26. [26]

    Detectability of Small Flaws in Advanced Engine Alloys

    Frank J Margetan, R Bruce Thompson, and Y Kim Han. Detectability of Small Flaws in Advanced Engine Alloys. Technical report, Iowa State University, 1993

    work page 1993

  27. [27]

    UltrasonicPropagationandScatteringinDuplexMicrostructureswithApplicationtoTitanium Alloys.Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 31:270–283, 2012

    L.Yang,J.Li,O.I.Lobkis,andS.I.Rokhlin. UltrasonicPropagationandScatteringinDuplexMicrostructureswithApplicationtoTitanium Alloys.Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation, 31:270–283, 2012. doi: 10.1007/s10921-012-0141-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s10921-012-0141-0 2012

  28. [28]

    Lee R. Dice. Measures of the amount of ecologic association between species.Ecology, 26(3):297–302, 1945

    work page 1945

  29. [29]

    Metrics for evaluating 3d medical image segmentation.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 34 (11):2367–2380, 2015

    Abdel Aziz Taha and Allan Hanbury. Metrics for evaluating 3d medical image segmentation.IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 34 (11):2367–2380, 2015

    work page 2015

  30. [30]

    Effect of microstructural elongation on backscattered field: Intensity measurement and multiple scattering estimation with a linear transducer array.Ultrasonics, 82:379–389, 2018

    Aurélien Baelde, Jérôme Laurent, Pierre Millien, Richard Coulette, Warida Ben Khalifa, Frédéric Jenson, Fan Sun, Mathias Fink, and Claire Prada. Effect of microstructural elongation on backscattered field: Intensity measurement and multiple scattering estimation with a linear transducer array.Ultrasonics, 82:379–389, 2018. ISSN 0041624X. doi: 10.1016/j.ul...

    work page doi:10.1016/j.ultras.2017.09.006 2018

  31. [31]

    Blackshire, Jeong K

    James L. Blackshire, Jeong K. Na, and Kevin Daugherty. Coherent ultrasonic backscatter within a textured titanium alloy.AIP Conference Proceedings, 2102, 2019. ISSN 15517616. doi: 10.1063/1.5099725. 16

    work page doi:10.1063/1.5099725 2019