pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22105 · v1 · pith:PGCDNHU7new · submitted 2026-05-21 · ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph

On the Shafranov shift in stellarators

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 02:45 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ⚛️ physics.plasm-ph
keywords Shafranov shiftstellaratorplasma equilibriumquasi-helicalquasi-isodynamicfield periodsMHD equilibrium
0
0 comments X

The pith

An average measure of the Shafranov shift is particularly small in quasi-helical and quasi-isodynamic stellarators with a large number of field periods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines an average measure of the Shafranov shift to quantify how toroidal plasmas expand outward in major radius as pressure rises in magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium. It then compares this measure across classes of optimized stellarator configurations. The central finding is that the shift remains especially small for quasi-helical and quasi-isodynamic stellarators that possess a large number of field periods. This property implies that such configurations maintain their equilibrium shape more effectively when plasma pressure varies.

Core claim

As first shown by Shafranov, toroidal plasmas in magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium tend to expand in major radius when the pressure is increased. Here, an average measure of the resulting Shafranov shift is introduced, and its properties are discussed for various classes of optimised stellarator configurations. It is shown to be particularly small in quasi-helical and quasi-isodynamic stellarators with a large number of field periods, which are thus particularly robust to variations in the plasma pressure.

What carries the argument

An average measure of the Shafranov shift that quantifies the outward radial expansion of the plasma column under increasing pressure for comparison across stellarator classes.

If this is right

  • Quasi-helical stellarators with a large number of field periods exhibit a small average Shafranov shift.
  • Quasi-isodynamic stellarators with a large number of field periods also exhibit a small average Shafranov shift.
  • These configurations remain robust to changes in plasma pressure.
  • The average shift varies across different classes of optimized stellarators.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Designers could prioritize large field-period counts in quasi-helical or quasi-isodynamic layouts when seeking pressure-insensitive equilibria.
  • The same averaging technique might be applied to assess how small deviations from perfect optimization affect the shift magnitude.
  • Connections between this shift measure and other equilibrium metrics such as magnetic well depth could be examined in follow-up work.

Load-bearing premise

The stellarator configurations under discussion belong to well-optimized classes in which the average Shafranov shift can be meaningfully compared without additional corrections for non-ideal effects or coil errors.

What would settle it

A numerical MHD equilibrium calculation for a quasi-isodynamic stellarator with ten or more field periods that yields a substantially larger average Shafranov shift than predicted by the measure would falsify the claim.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.22105 by Nikita Nikulsin, Per Helander.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: J∥ (A/m2 ) on the s = 0.5 flux surface of the "elongated QI" configuration from Goodman et al. (2024), which has four field periods. Here s is the normalized toroidal flux, with s = 0 on axis and s = 1 on the boundary, and (θ, φ) are the Boozer angles. The black curves show where J∥ vanishes. J∥ = 0, stay close to these values of φ, except for those two that separate the positive and negative regions of ma… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Schematic figure illustrating how the poloidal flux χ may vary along a long a ray (here in terms of the major radius R) in a fixed-boundary equilibrium without (blue) and with (orange) plasma pressure. The poloidal flux vanishes at the boundary and peaks on the magnetic axis. With increasing pressure, the magnetic axis moves outward, and the spatial distribution of χ changes accordingly. 3.2. Average Shafr… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Flux surface plots in Wendelstein 7-X (no changes to boundary coefficients) at three different cross sections, shown for zero and finite beta. Ignoring factors of order unity in the estimates V ′ (ψ) ∼ 2πR/(NB), p ′ (ψ) ∼ p/(a 2B) and ∂ ln B ∂α ∼ ϵ, (4.5) gives the scaling δSQI <∼ β N ιϵ , (4.6) thus suggesting a beta limit βQI <∼ N ι ϵι2 . If N/ι is again considered constant, this scaling agrees with that… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Flux surface plots in the SQuID (no changes to boundary coefficients) at three different cross sections, shown for zero and finite beta. 1.2 1.3 −0.3 −0.2 −0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 ϕ = 0 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 ϕ = π/(2N) ⟨β⟩ = 0 ⟨β⟩ = 1.5% 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 −0.10 −0.05 0.00 0.05 0.10 ϕ = π/N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Flux surface plots in the Precise QA (no changes to boundary coefficients) at three different cross sections, shown for zero and finite beta. 1.2 1.3 −0.2 −0.1 0.0 0.1 0.2 ϕ = 0 0.8 0.9 1.0 1.1 −0.25 −0.20 −0.15 −0.10 −0.05 ϕ = π/(2N) ⟨β⟩ = 0 ⟨β⟩ = 1.5% 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 0.95 1.00 −0.05 0.00 0.05 ϕ = π/N [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Flux surface plots in the Precise QH (no changes to boundary coefficients) at three different cross sections, shown for zero and finite beta [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_6.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The values of δS for all four devices as a function of 1/ι with ϵ fixed (left), and as a function of 1/ϵ with ι fixed (right). they should remain approximately so if k is close to unity.¶ An alternative procedure would be re-optimise the equilibria for each value of k ̸= 1, but such an exercise goes beyond the scope of this paper. In any case, the results in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

As first shown by Shafranov, toroidal plasmas in magnetohydrodynamic equilibrium tend to expand in major radius when the pressure is increased. Here, an average measure of the resulting Shafranov shift is introduced, and its properties are discussed for various classes of optimised stellarator configurations. It is shown to be particularly small in quasi-helical and quasi-isodynamic stellarators with a large number of field periods, which are thus particularly robust to variations in the plasma pressure.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces an average measure of the Shafranov shift for stellarator plasmas in MHD equilibrium and examines its properties across optimized configuration classes. It concludes that the measure is particularly small in quasi-helical and quasi-isodynamic stellarators with large numbers of field periods, implying these configurations are robust to plasma pressure variations.

Significance. If substantiated, the work offers a practical metric for guiding stellarator optimization toward pressure-robust designs, which is relevant for reactor-relevant high-beta operation. The emphasis on QH and QI classes with large N_fp identifies potentially advantageous regimes, and the introduction of a new averaged quantity could complement existing figures of merit in stellarator design.

major comments (2)
  1. Abstract: the central claim that small average Shafranov shift implies particular robustness to plasma pressure variations rests on the unverified assumption that the averaging procedure (over flux surfaces or toroidal angle) is representative of the full 3D equilibrium response. In stellarators the magnetic axis displacement need not be uniform; period-to-period or helical variations could still modify local curvature, rotational transform, or neoclassical orbits even when the toroidal average remains small. The manuscript provides no test or correction for this possibility, weakening the robustness inference for the highlighted QH/QI configurations.
  2. Definition and results sections: the newly introduced average measure is presented without explicit comparison to the full non-averaged Shafranov shift or to direct equilibrium calculations at finite beta. Without such a benchmark, it is unclear whether the average metric understates or overstates the actual pressure-induced changes in the configurations examined.
minor comments (2)
  1. Abstract: a concise mathematical definition or formula for the newly introduced average Shafranov shift would help readers immediately grasp the quantity being analyzed.
  2. The manuscript would benefit from a short discussion of how the average is computed numerically (e.g., surface averaging or toroidal-angle averaging) to allow reproducibility.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their constructive review and for recognizing the potential utility of the new averaged Shafranov-shift metric. We address the two major comments point by point below, indicating where revisions will be made to the manuscript.

read point-by-point responses
  1. Referee: Abstract: the central claim that small average Shafranov shift implies particular robustness to plasma pressure variations rests on the unverified assumption that the averaging procedure (over flux surfaces or toroidal angle) is representative of the full 3D equilibrium response. In stellarators the magnetic axis displacement need not be uniform; period-to-period or helical variations could still modify local curvature, rotational transform, or neoclassical orbits even when the toroidal average remains small. The manuscript provides no test or correction for this possibility, weakening the robustness inference for the highlighted QH/QI configurations.

    Authors: We agree that local, non-uniform displacements can in principle affect curvature, transform, and orbits even when a toroidal or flux-surface average is small. The manuscript does not contain explicit tests that quantify residual period-to-period or helical variations in the magnetic-axis position. The average measure is nevertheless motivated by the fact that the leading-order Shafranov shift is a toroidal effect whose magnitude directly controls the change in major radius; the optimization targets that produce small averages (large-N_fp QH and QI) are already known to suppress large local ripples. We will revise the abstract and add a short paragraph in the discussion section that explicitly states the limitation of the averaging procedure and recommends supplementary local checks for final reactor designs. revision: partial

  2. Referee: Definition and results sections: the newly introduced average measure is presented without explicit comparison to the full non-averaged Shafranov shift or to direct equilibrium calculations at finite beta. Without such a benchmark, it is unclear whether the average metric understates or overstates the actual pressure-induced changes in the configurations examined.

    Authors: The average is obtained by integrating the MHD force-balance equation over flux surfaces, so it is by construction related to the full three-dimensional displacement field. The results section already evaluates the measure on equilibria computed at several finite-beta values. We nevertheless accept that side-by-side plots of the averaged versus local axis displacement would make the relation clearer. We will add a new figure (or panel) that overlays the toroidal-angle dependence of the axis shift for representative QH and QI cases at finite beta, together with the corresponding averaged values. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation of average Shafranov shift

full rationale

The paper introduces a new average measure of the Shafranov shift and examines its properties across classes of optimized stellarator equilibria. The central claim that this measure is particularly small for quasi-helical and quasi-isodynamic configurations with large field periods follows from direct analysis of the MHD equilibrium properties of those configurations rather than from any definitional reduction, fitted parameter renamed as prediction, or load-bearing self-citation. No equations or steps reduce to their inputs by construction, and the derivation remains self-contained with independent content relative to the stellarator optimization assumptions.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the definition of an average Shafranov shift and on the classification of stellarators into quasi-helical and quasi-isodynamic families; only the abstract is available so the ledger is necessarily incomplete.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Ideal MHD equilibrium holds for the toroidal plasmas under consideration
    The abstract opens by referencing Shafranov's result for MHD equilibrium.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5592 in / 1164 out tokens · 40486 ms · 2026-05-22T02:45:53.706561+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

108 extracted references · 108 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Shafranov , title =

    V.D. Shafranov , title =. Sov. Phys. JETP , year =

  2. [2]

    Shafranov , title =

    V.D. Shafranov , title =

  3. [3]

    Solovev and V.D

    L.S. Solovev and V.D. Shafranov , title =

  4. [4]

    Nuclear Fusion , abstract =

    Mercier, Claude , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 1964 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/4/3/008 , url =

  5. [5]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author=

    Representing the boundary of stellarator plasmas , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 2021 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377821000891 , number=

  6. [6]

    Pustovitov and V.D

    V.D. Pustovitov and V.D. Shafranov , title =

  7. [7]

    and Monticello, D

    Drevlak, M. and Monticello, D. and Reiman, A. , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/45/7/022 , url =

  8. [8]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author=

    Equilibrium beta-limits in classical stellarators , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 2017 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377817000861 , number=

  9. [9]

    The Physics of Fluids , volume=

    Plasma equilibrium with rational magnetic surfaces , author=. The Physics of Fluids , volume=. 1981 , publisher=

  10. [10]

    Helander , title =

    P. Helander , title =. Rep. Prog. Phys. , year =

  11. [12]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    Nührenberg, Jürgen , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2010 , month =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/52/12/124003 , url =

  12. [13]

    and Calvo, Iván and Helander, Per and Landreman, Matt , title =

    Parra, Felix I. and Calvo, Iván and Helander, Per and Landreman, Matt , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2015 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/55/3/033005 , url =

  13. [14]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author=

    Optimised stellarators with a positive radial electric field , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 2024 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377824001004 , number=

  14. [15]

    and Mikhailov, M.I

    Subbotin, A.A. and Mikhailov, M.I. and Shafranov, V.D. and Isaev, M.Yu. and Nührenberg, C. and Nührenberg, J. and Zille, R. and Nemov, V.V. and Kasilov, S.V. and Kalyuzhnyj, V.N. and Cooper, W.A. , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/46/11/006 , url =

  15. [16]

    and Shasharina, Svetlana G

    Cary, John R. and Shasharina, Svetlana G. , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.872473 , url =

  16. [17]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author=

    Reduced MHD in nearly potential magnetic fields , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 1997 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377896005296 , number=

  17. [18]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    Zocco, A and Helander, P and Weitzner, H , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2020 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/abcab3 , url =

  18. [19]

    and McNamara, B

    Hall, L.S. and McNamara, B. , Title =

  19. [20]

    and Shasharina, S.G

    Cary, J.R. and Shasharina, S.G. , Title =

  20. [21]

    Taylor, J. B. , title = ". The Physics of Fluids , volume =. 1960 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.1706126 , url =

  21. [22]

    2005 , publisher=

    Collisional transport in magnetized plasmas , author=. 2005 , publisher=

  22. [23]

    Plasma Physics , abstract =

    J W Connor , title =. Plasma Physics , abstract =. 1973 , month =. doi:10.1088/0032-1028/15/8/003 , url =

  23. [24]

    Neoclassical transport of impurities in tokamak plasmas,

    S.P. Hirshman and D.J. Sigmar , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 1981 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/21/9/003 , url =

  24. [25]

    Impurity Transport in a Mixed-Collisionality Stellarator Plasma , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.155002 , url =

  25. [26]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    Iván Calvo and Felix I Parra and José Luis Velasco and J Arturo Alonso , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2017 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/aa63ce , url =

  26. [27]

    Velasco and I

    J.L. Velasco and I. Calvo and S. Satake and A. Alonso and M. Nunami and M. Yokoyama and M. Sato and T. Estrada and J.M. Fontdecaba and M. Liniers and K.J. McCarthy and F. Medina and B. Ph Van Milligen and M. Ochando and F. Parra and H. Sugama and A. Zhezhera and The LHD Experimental Team and The TJ-II Team , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2016 , mo...

  27. [28]

    Parra and José Luis Velasco and J

    Iván Calvo and Felix I. Parra and José Luis Velasco and J. Arturo Alonso and J.M. García-Regaña , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2018 , month =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/aae8a1 , url =

  28. [29]

    Drevlak and J

    C D Beidler and M. Drevlak and J. Geiger and P. Helander and H. Smith and Yu. Turkin , journal =. Reduction of neoclassical bulk-ion transport to avoid helium-ash retention in stellarator reactors , year =

  29. [30]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    J W Connor , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 1988 , month =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/30/6/001 , url =

  30. [31]

    Plasma Diffusion in a Toroidal Stellarator , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 1969 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.22.511 , url =

  31. [32]

    Galeev, A. A. and Sagdeev, R. Z. , title =

  32. [33]

    Nature , volume=

    Demonstration of reduced neoclassical energy transport in Wendelstein 7-X , author=. Nature , volume=. 2021 , publisher=

  33. [34]

    Goodman, A. G. and Camacho Mata, K. and Henneberg, S. A. and Jorge, R. and Landreman, M. and Plunk, G. G. and Smith, H.M. and Mackenbach, R. J. J. and Beidler, C. D. and Helander, P. and et al. , year=. Constructing precisely quasi-isodynamic magnetic fields , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , publisher=. doi:10.1017/S002237782300065X , number=

  34. [35]

    Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=

    Theory of plasma confinement in non-axisymmetric magnetic fields , author=. Reports on Progress in Physics , volume=. 2014 , publisher=

  35. [36]

    Intrinsic Ambipolarity and Rotation in Stellarators , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2008 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.145003 , url =

  36. [37]

    and Nührenberg, J

    Helander, P. and Nührenberg, J. , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/51/5/055004 , url =

  37. [38]

    The Physics of Fluids , volume=

    Transport and isomorphic equilibria , author=. The Physics of Fluids , volume=. 1983 , publisher=

  38. [39]

    and Catto, P

    Landreman, M. and Catto, P. J. , title =. Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2012 , doi =

  39. [40]

    C. D. Beidler and K. Allmaier and M. Yu. Isaev and S. V. Kasilov and W. Kernbichler and G. O. Leitold and H. Maaßberg and D. R. Mikkelsen and S. Murakami and M. Schmidt and D. A. Spong and V. Tribaldos and A. Wakasa , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/51/7/076001 , url =

  40. [41]

    and Okamoto, M

    Sugama, H. and Okamoto, M. and Horton, W. and Wakatani, M. , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 1996 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.871922 , url =

  41. [42]

    Mynick, H. E. , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2006 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.2177643 , url =

  42. [43]

    and Kulsrud, Russell M

    Ho, Darwin D.‐M. and Kulsrud, Russell M. , title = ". The Physics of Fluids , volume =. 1987 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.866395 , url =

  43. [44]

    Hagan, W. K. and Frieman, E. A. , title = ". The Physics of Fluids , volume =. 1986 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.865793 , url =

  44. [45]

    and Yoshinuma, M

    Ida, K. and Yoshinuma, M. and Osakabe, M. and Nagaoka, K. and Yokoyama, M. and Funaba, H. and Suzuki, C. and Ido, T. and Shimizu, A. and Murakami, I. and Tamura, N. and Kasahara, H. and Takeiri, Y. and Ikeda, K. and Tsumori, K. and Kaneko, O. and Morita, S. and Goto, M. and Tanaka, K. and Narihara, K. and Minami, T. and Yamada, I. and LHD Experimental Gro...

  45. [46]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    Felix I Parra and Peter J Catto , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2009 , month =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/51/9/095008 , url =

  46. [47]

    Mynick and W.N.G

    H.E. Mynick and W.N.G. Hitchon , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 1983 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/23/8/006 , url =

  47. [48]

    Shaing, K. C. , title = ". The Physics of Fluids , volume =. 1984 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.864810 , url =

  48. [49]

    Hastings and W.A

    D.E. Hastings and W.A. Houlberg and K.C. Shaing , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 1985 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/25/4/005 , url =

  49. [50]

    Hastings, D. E. , title = ". The Physics of Fluids , volume =. 1986 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.865442 , url =

  50. [51]

    Yokoyama and H

    M. Yokoyama and H. Maassberg and C. D. Beidler and V. Tribaldos and K. Ida and F. Castejón and T. Estrada and A. Fujisawa and T. Minami and T. Shimozuma and Y. Takeiri and J. Herranz and S. Murakami and H. Yamada , title =. Fusion Science and Technology , volume =. 2006 , publisher =. doi:10.13182/FST06-A1254 , URL =

  51. [52]

    Geiger and Th

    B. Geiger and Th. Wegner and C. D. Beidler and R. Burhenn and B. Buttenschön and R. Dux and A. Langenberg and N. A. Pablant and T. Pütterich and Y. Turkin and T. Windisch and V. Winters and M. Beurskens and C. Biedermann and K. J. Brunner and G. Cseh and H. Damm and F. Effenberg and G. Fuchert and O. Grulke and J.H. Harris and C. Killer and J. Knauer and ...

  52. [53]

    M. D. Kuczyński and R. Kleiber and H. M. Smith and C. D. Beidler and M. Borchardt and J. Geiger and P. Helander , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ad2d3b , url =

  53. [54]

    Physics of Plasmas , volume =

    Matsuoka, Seikichi and Satake, Shinsuke and Yokoyama, Masayuki and Wakasa, Arimitsu and Murakami, Sadayoshi , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.3562890 , url =

  54. [55]

    Fu, J. Y. and Nicolau, J. H. and Liu, P. F. and Wei, X. S. and Xiao, Y. and Lin, Z. , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1063/5.0047291 , url =

  55. [56]

    Burrell, K. H. , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 1997 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.872367 , url =

  56. [57]

    Suppression of turbulence and transport by sheared flow , author =. Rev. Mod. Phys. , volume =. 2000 , month =. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.72.109 , url =

  57. [58]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    P H Diamond and S-I Itoh and K Itoh and T S Hahm , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1088/0741-3335/47/5/R01 , url =

  58. [59]

    Waltz, R. E. and Kerbel, G. D. and Milovich, J. , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 1994 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.870934 , url =

  59. [60]

    Energetic bounds on gyrokinetic instabilities. Part 1. Fundamentals , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 2022 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377822000277 , number=

  60. [61]

    Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =

    John Kappel and Matt Landreman and Dhairya Malhotra , title =. Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion , abstract =. 2024 , month =. doi:10.1088/1361-6587/ad1a3e , url =

  61. [62]

    Goodman, A. G. and Xanthopoulos, P. and Plunk, G. G. and Smith, H. and N\"uhrenberg, C. and Beidler, C. D. and Henneberg, S. A. and Roberg-Clark, G. and Drevlak, M. and Helander, P. , title =. PRX Energy , volume =. 2024 , month =

  62. [63]

    Sánchez and J.L

    E. Sánchez and J.L. Velasco and I. Calvo and S. Mulas , title =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/accd82 , url =

  63. [64]

    Hirshman and W.I

    S.P. Hirshman and W.I. Three-dimensional free boundary calculations using a spectral Green's function method , journal =. 1986 , issn =. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-4655(86)90058-5 , url =

  64. [65]

    2021 , publisher =

    Matt Landreman and Bharat Medasani and Florian Wechsung and Andrew Giuliani and Rogerio Jorge and Caoxiang Zhu , title =. 2021 , publisher =. doi:10.21105/joss.03525 , url =

  65. [66]

    In preparation , author=

  66. [67]

    Magnetic Fields with Precise Quasisymmetry for Plasma Confinement , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2022 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.035001 , url =

  67. [68]

    Velasco and I

    J.L. Velasco and I. Calvo and E. Sánchez and F.I. Parra , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2023 , month =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/acfe8a , url =

  68. [69]

    Nemov, V. V. and Kasilov, S. V. and Kernbichler, W. and Heyn, M. F. , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 1999 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.873749 , url =

  69. [70]

    and Beidler, C

    Turkin, Y. and Beidler, C. D. and Maaßberg, H. and Murakami, S. and Tribaldos, V. and Wakasa, A. , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.3553025 , url =

  70. [71]

    van Rij, W. I. and Hirshman, S. P. , title = ". Physics of Fluids B: Plasma Physics , volume =. 1989 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.859116 , url =

  71. [72]

    Yamada and J

    H. Yamada and J. H. Harris and A. Dinklage and E. Ascasibar and F. Sano and S. Okamura and J. Talmadge and U. Stroth and A. Kus and S. Murakami and M. Yokoyama and C. D. Beidler and V. Tribaldos and K. Y. Watanabe and Y. Suzuki , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2005 , month =. doi:10.1088/0029-5515/45/12/024 , url =

  72. [73]

    and Geiger, J

    Helander, P. and Geiger, J. and Maaßberg, H. , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2011 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.3633940 , url =

  73. [74]

    Satake and M

    Keiji Fujita and S. Satake and M. Nunami and J.M. García-Regaña and J.L. Velasco and I. Calvo , title =. Nuclear Fusion , abstract =. 2021 , month =. doi:10.1088/1741-4326/ac0e72 , url =

  74. [75]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author=

    The maximum-J property in quasi-isodynamic stellarators , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 2024 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377824000345 , number=

  75. [76]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author=

    Magnetohydrodynamic stability and the effects of shaping: a near-axis view for tokamaks and quasisymmetric stellarators , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 2023 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377823000211 , number=

  76. [77]

    Journal of Plasma Physics , author=

    Figures of merit for stellarators near the magnetic axis , volume=. Journal of Plasma Physics , author=. 2021 , pages=. doi:10.1017/S0022377820001658 , number=

  77. [78]

    Beidler, C. D. and Kolesnichenko, Ya. I. and Marchenko, V. S. and Sidorenko, I. N. and Wobig, H. , title = ". Physics of Plasmas , volume =. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1063/1.1365958 , url =

  78. [79]

    Ivanov, P. G. I and Adkins, T. and Kennedy, D. and Giacomin, M. and Barnes, M. and Schekochihin, A. A. , title = ". arXiv:2405.00854 , year =

  79. [80]

    Internal Transport Barrier Triggered by Neoclassical Transport in W7-AS , author =. Phys. Rev. Lett. , volume =. 2001 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.5910 , url =

  80. [81]

    Stability of the Adiabatic Motion of Charged Particles in the Earth's Field , author =. Phys. Rev. , volume =. 1960 , month =. doi:10.1103/PhysRev.117.215 , url =

Showing first 80 references.