pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23181 · v1 · pith:GQRMX77Pnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

High-order Conservative Discontinuous Galerkin Methods via Implicit Penalization for the Generalized Korteweg-de Vries Equation and the Hirota-Satsuma KdV System

M. Shan Tariq , Yanlai Chen , Bo Dong This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 04:13 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords discontinuous Galerkinconservative methodsKorteweg-de Vries equationHirota-Satsuma systeminvariant preservationnumerical tracespenalty parameters
0
0 comments X

The pith

New discontinuous Galerkin methods for the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation and Hirota-Satsuma system conserve mass, energy, and Hamiltonian through single-valued traces and implicit penalties.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper introduces conservative discontinuous Galerkin methods for the gKdV equation and the HS-KdV system. These methods ensure mass conservation via single-valued numerical traces and enforce energy and Hamiltonian conservation by implicitly solving for penalty parameters. The redesign of the traces removes the time derivative of jumps present in prior work, which allows extension to higher-order time discretizations and reduces the number of nonlinear solves per step. For the HS-KdV system, this yields the first DG method preserving all three invariants.

Core claim

The methods preserve the invariants of the exact solutions by using single-valued traces for mass and auxiliary conservation constraints to determine penalties implicitly for energy and Hamiltonian, with a trace configuration that avoids the derivative of the jump term to support higher-order time schemes.

What carries the argument

Redesigned numerical trace configuration that eliminates the derivative-of-jump term while enforcing conservation through implicit penalty parameters.

If this is right

  • Higher-order temporal accuracy becomes possible for both the gKdV equation and the HS-KdV system.
  • Fewer nonlinear systems need to be solved per time step compared to the prior formulation.
  • The HS-KdV system now has a DG method that preserves mass, energy, and Hamiltonian simultaneously.
  • Long-time simulations maintain the invariants without drift from the conservation enforcement.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The trace redesign could apply to other nonlinear wave equations that require multiple invariant preservations.
  • The approach of implicit penalties via auxiliary constraints might reduce computational cost in related finite element schemes for dispersive PDEs.
  • Extension to three-dimensional or variable-coefficient versions of these equations would test whether the single-valued structure remains sufficient for mass conservation.

Load-bearing premise

The implicit determination of penalty parameters through auxiliary conservation constraints does not introduce additional errors or instability.

What would settle it

A computation with third-order or higher time discretization that loses one of the invariants or becomes unstable would falsify the claim that the redesigned traces enable stable higher-order conservative schemes.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.23181 by Bo Dong, M. Shan Tariq, Yanlai Chen.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Numerical Experiment 1 (third-order linear equation): Energy with error (left) and Hamiltonian with error (right) conservation. M.S. Tariq et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 30 of 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p030_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Numerical Experiment 2 (third-order nonlinear equation): Errors of energy (left) and Hamiltonian (right) for 𝜀 = 1 (top), 0.1 (middle), and 0.01 (bottom). M.S. Tariq et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 31 of 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Numerical Experiment 3 (classical KdV equation): Energy conservation and error (left) and Hamiltonian conservation and error (right) conservation for the Cnoidal wave. M.S. Tariq et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 32 of 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p032_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Numerical Experiment 4 (forced HS–KdV system with sinusoidal solutions): Conservation of energy with corresponding error (left) and Hamiltonian conservation with corresponding error (right). M.S. Tariq et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 33 of 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p033_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Numerical Experiment 5 (HS–KdV system with solitary-wave solutions): Conservation of energy with corresponding error (left) and Hamiltonian conservation with corresponding error (right). M.S. Tariq et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 34 of 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p034_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Flowchart illustrating the implementation of the conservative DG for the gKdV equation with the Implicit Midpoint rule. M.S. Tariq et al.: Preprint submitted to Elsevier Page 35 of 29 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p035_6.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

We develop new conservative discontinuous Galerkin (DG) methods for nonlinear wave problems, focusing on the generalized Korteweg-de Vries (gKdV) equation and the coupled Hirota-Satsuma KdV (HS-KdV) system. The proposed methods preserve mass through the single-valued structure of numerical traces, while energy and Hamiltonian conservation are enforced by implicitly determining penalty parameters in the numerical traces through auxiliary conservation constraints. In our previous work [11], we developed a conservative DG method for the gKdV equation; however, that formulation involves the time derivative of the jump of the approximate solution, which complicates extensions beyond second-order temporal accuracy. Our new formulation overcomes this limitation by introducing a redesigned trace configuration that eliminates the derivative-of-jump term. This novel enhancement seamlessly paves the way for higher-order time discretizations and requires solving fewer nonlinear systems per time step than the previous approach. For the coupled HS-KdV system, we present the first conservative DG method that preserves all three invariants of the exact solution. Numerical results demonstrate the accuracy and expected convergence behavior of the proposed methods, as well as long-time stability and strong conservation properties for both the gKdV equation and HS-KdV system.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper develops new conservative discontinuous Galerkin methods for the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equation and the Hirota-Satsuma KdV system. Mass is preserved using single-valued numerical traces, while energy and Hamiltonian conservation are achieved by implicitly determining penalty parameters through auxiliary conservation constraints. The formulation redesigns the trace to eliminate the time derivative of the jump term from previous work, enabling higher-order time discretizations with fewer nonlinear solves. It claims to be the first conservative DG method for HS-KdV preserving all three invariants. Numerical results show accuracy, convergence, stability, and conservation.

Significance. If the exact conservation properties hold as claimed, this work would be significant for advancing structure-preserving numerical methods for nonlinear wave equations. The ability to use high-order time schemes while maintaining conservation is valuable for long-time simulations of dispersive PDEs, and the application to the coupled system adds novelty.

major comments (2)
  1. [Formulation of the DG method] The central claim of exact energy and Hamiltonian conservation via implicitly solved penalty parameters lacks supporting analysis on the existence, uniqueness, and well-posedness of these parameters. Additionally, there is no discussion of how tolerances in the nonlinear solver affect the conservation errors, which is load-bearing for the 'exact' conservation assertion, especially in the coupled HS-KdV system.
  2. [Redesigned trace configuration] While the abstract states that the new trace eliminates the derivative-of-jump term and paves the way for higher-order time discretizations, the manuscript does not provide a detailed derivation or verification showing that the single-valued structure for mass conservation remains unaffected when extending to higher-order schemes.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] The abstract refers to 'our previous work [11]' without specifying the authors; ensuring the reference list clearly identifies this as prior work by the same group would help contextualize the improvements.
  2. [Numerical results] The description of numerical results mentions 'strong conservation properties' but specific quantitative measures of invariant drift over long times should be highlighted more clearly in the text or tables.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 1 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment below and indicate the revisions we will make.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Formulation of the DG method] The central claim of exact energy and Hamiltonian conservation via implicitly solved penalty parameters lacks supporting analysis on the existence, uniqueness, and well-posedness of these parameters. Additionally, there is no discussion of how tolerances in the nonlinear solver affect the conservation errors, which is load-bearing for the 'exact' conservation assertion, especially in the coupled HS-KdV system.

    Authors: We acknowledge that the manuscript does not contain a rigorous analysis of existence, uniqueness, or well-posedness for the implicitly determined penalty parameters; such an analysis lies outside the scope of the present work. We will revise the manuscript to include a detailed discussion of the numerical procedure used to solve for these parameters and to report numerical experiments demonstrating the effect of nonlinear solver tolerances on the observed conservation errors for both the gKdV and HS-KdV cases. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [Redesigned trace configuration] While the abstract states that the new trace eliminates the derivative-of-jump term and paves the way for higher-order time discretizations, the manuscript does not provide a detailed derivation or verification showing that the single-valued structure for mass conservation remains unaffected when extending to higher-order schemes.

    Authors: We will add an explicit derivation in the revised manuscript (in the section describing the numerical traces) that isolates the mass-conservation property. The single-valued numerical trace used for mass is independent of the penalty parameters and of any time-derivative terms; consequently the mass invariant is preserved exactly for any consistent time discretization, including higher-order schemes. We will also include a short verification subsection confirming this property holds under the redesigned trace. revision: yes

standing simulated objections not resolved
  • Rigorous proof of existence, uniqueness, and well-posedness of the implicitly solved penalty parameters

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; conservation enforced by explicit auxiliary constraints rather than derived

full rationale

The paper's central construction explicitly solves for penalty parameters from auxiliary conservation constraints to enforce energy/Hamiltonian preservation by design, while mass uses single-valued traces. This is a deliberate numerical method choice, not a derivation that reduces to its inputs by construction. The redesign eliminating the derivative-of-jump term is a structural modification independent of prior self-citations. No self-definitional loops, fitted predictions presented as results, or load-bearing uniqueness theorems from overlapping authors appear. The approach remains self-contained against the underlying PDE invariants and standard DG framework.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the standard mathematical framework for DG methods and the known conservation laws of the gKdV and HS-KdV equations. No new free parameters or invented entities are introduced; penalty parameters are implicitly solved for.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard assumptions of the discontinuous Galerkin framework for hyperbolic and dispersive PDEs, such as the existence of weak solutions and appropriate function spaces.
    Invoked implicitly in developing the numerical traces and conservation enforcement.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5766 in / 1455 out tokens · 28878 ms · 2026-05-25T04:13:03.459584+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

52 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    US Government printing office, 1948

    Milton Abramowitz and Irene A Stegun.Handbook of mathematical functions with formulas, graphs, and mathematical tables, volume 55. US Government printing office, 1948

    work page 1948

  2. [2]

    Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems.SIAM journal on numerical analysis, 39(5):1749–1779, 2002

    Douglas N Arnold, Franco Brezzi, Bernardo Cockburn, and L Donatella Marini. Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems.SIAM journal on numerical analysis, 39(5):1749–1779, 2002

    work page 2002

  3. [3]

    Arnold and Ragnar Winther

    Douglas N. Arnold and Ragnar Winther. A superconvergent finite element method for the Korteweg–de Vries equation.Mathematics of Computation, 38(157):23–36, 1982

    work page 1982

  4. [4]

    AstablenumericalschemebasedonthehybridizeddiscontinuousGalerkinmethodfor the Ito-type coupled KdV system.Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation, 4(4):1351–1373, 2022

    ShimaBaharlouei,RezaMokhtari,andNabiChegini. AstablenumericalschemebasedonthehybridizeddiscontinuousGalerkinmethodfor the Ito-type coupled KdV system.Communications on Applied Mathematics and Computation, 4(4):1351–1373, 2022

    work page 2022

  5. [5]

    Baker, Vassilios A

    Garth A. Baker, Vassilios A. Dougalis, and Ohannes A. Karakashian. Convergence of Galerkin approximations for the Korteweg–de Vries equation.Mathematics of Computation, 40(162):419–433, 1983

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    Bound-preserving schemes for𝑃 2 local discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of KdV-type equations

    Hui Bi and Feilong Zhao. Bound-preserving schemes for𝑃 2 local discontinuous Galerkin discretizations of KdV-type equations. Computational and Applied Mathematics, 44(1):46, 2025

    work page 2025

  7. [7]

    Conservative, discontinuous Galerkin–methods for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation.Mathematics of Computation, 82(283):1401–1432, 2013

    Jerry Bona, Hongqiu Chen, Ohannes Karakashian, and Yulong Xing. Conservative, discontinuous Galerkin–methods for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation.Mathematics of Computation, 82(283):1401–1432, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Bona, Hongqiu Chen, Ohannes Karakashian, and Yulong Xing

    Jerry L. Bona, Hongqiu Chen, Ohannes Karakashian, and Yulong Xing. Conservative, discontinuous Galerkin methods for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation.Mathematics of Computation, 82(283):1401–1432, 2013

    work page 2013

  9. [9]

    Multi-componentgeneralizationsoftheHirota–SatsumacoupledKdVequation

    JunchaoChen,YongChen,Bao-FengFeng,andHanminZhu. Multi-componentgeneralizationsoftheHirota–SatsumacoupledKdVequation. Applied Mathematics Letters, 37:15–21, 2014

    work page 2014

  10. [10]

    Yanlai Chen, Bernardo Cockburn, and Bo Dong. A new discontinuous Galerkin method, conserving the discreteℎ2-norm, for third-order linear equations in one space dimension.IMA Journal of Numerical Analysis, 36(4):1570–1598, 2016

    work page 2016

  11. [11]

    AnewconservativediscontinuousGalerkinmethodviaimplicitpenalizationforthegeneralized Korteweg–de Vries equation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 60(6):3078–3098, 2022

    YanlaiChen,BoDong,andRebeccaPereira. AnewconservativediscontinuousGalerkinmethodviaimplicitpenalizationforthegeneralized Korteweg–de Vries equation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 60(6):3078–3098, 2022

    work page 2022

  12. [12]

    SpectralcollocationsolutionofageneralizedHirota–SatsumacoupledKdVequation.International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 84(4):541–551, 2007

    M.T.Darvishi,F.Khani,andS.Kheybari. SpectralcollocationsolutionofageneralizedHirota–SatsumacoupledKdVequation.International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 84(4):541–551, 2007

    work page 2007

  13. [13]

    A numerical and theoretical study of certain nonlinear wave phenomena.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London

    Bengt Fornberg and Gerald Beresford Whitham. A numerical and theoretical study of certain nonlinear wave phenomena.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences, 289(1361):373–404, 1978

    work page 1978

  14. [14]

    An energy-conserving ultra-weak discontinuous Galerkin method for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation.Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 349:41–51, 2019

    Guosheng Fu and Chi-Wang Shu. An energy-conserving ultra-weak discontinuous Galerkin method for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation.Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 349:41–51, 2019

    work page 2019

  15. [15]

    C. S. Gardner and G. K. Morikawa. Similarity in the asymptotic behavior of collision-free hydromagnetic waves and water waves. Technical Report NYO-9082, Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, 1960

    work page 1960

  16. [16]

    Numerical studies on recurrence of the Korteweg-de Vries equation.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 42(3):1040– 1046, 1977

    Katsuhiko Goda. Numerical studies on recurrence of the Korteweg-de Vries equation.Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, 42(3):1040– 1046, 1977

    work page 1977

  17. [17]

    Ben-Yu Guo and Jie Shen. On spectral approximations using modified Legendre rational functions: Application to the Korteweg–de Vries equation on the half line.Indiana University Mathematics Journal, 50(1):181–204, 2001. M.S. Tariq et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 23 of 29 Conservative DG via Implicit Penalization for gKdV and HS–KdV

    work page 2001

  18. [18]

    The Korteweg-de Vries equation and water waves

    Joseph L Hammack and Harvey Segur. The Korteweg-de Vries equation and water waves. part 2. comparison with experiments.Journal of Fluid mechanics, 65(2):289–314, 1974

    work page 1974

  19. [19]

    JosephLHammackandHarveySegur.TheKorteweg-deVriesequationandwaterwaves.part3.oscillatorywaves.JournalofFluidMechanics, 84(2):337–358, 1978

    work page 1978

  20. [20]

    A meshfree interpolation method for the numerical solution of the coupled nonlinear partial differential equations.Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 33(3):399–409, 2009

    Sirajul Haq, Marjan Uddin, et al. A meshfree interpolation method for the numerical solution of the coupled nonlinear partial differential equations.Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements, 33(3):399–409, 2009

    work page 2009

  21. [21]

    Solitarywavesonconduitsofbuoyantfluidinamoreviscousfluid.GeophysicalandAstrophysicalFluid Dynamics, 51(1–4):35–52, 1990

    K.R.HelfrichandJ.A.Whitehead. Solitarywavesonconduitsofbuoyantfluidinamoreviscousfluid.GeophysicalandAstrophysicalFluid Dynamics, 51(1–4):35–52, 1990

    work page 1990

  22. [22]

    Soliton solutions of a coupled Korteweg-de Vries equation.Physics Letters A, 85(8-9):407–408, 1981

    Ryogo Hirota and Junkichi Satsuma. Soliton solutions of a coupled Korteweg-de Vries equation.Physics Letters A, 85(8-9):407–408, 1981

    work page 1981

  23. [23]

    HelgeHolden,KennethH.Karlsen,andNilsHenrikRisebro.OperatorsplittingmethodsforgeneralizedKorteweg–deVriesequations.Journal of Computational Physics, 153(1):203–222, 1999

    work page 1999

  24. [24]

    Karlsen, Nils Henrik Risebro, and Terence Tao

    Helge Holden, Kenneth H. Karlsen, Nils Henrik Risebro, and Terence Tao. Operator splitting for the KdV equation.Mathematics of Computation, 80(274):821–846, 2011

    work page 2011

  25. [25]

    Xue Hong, Qianrui Wei, and Xiaofei Zhao. Comparison of different discontinuous Galerkin methods based on various reformulations for gKdV equation: Soliton dynamics and blowup.Computer Physics Communications, 300:109180, 2024

    work page 2024

  26. [26]

    Thepseudospectralmethodforthird-orderdifferentialequations.SIAMJournalonNumericalAnalysis, 29(6):1626–1647, 1992

    WeizhangHuangandDavidM.Sloan. Thepseudospectralmethodforthird-orderdifferentialequations.SIAMJournalonNumericalAnalysis, 29(6):1626–1647, 1992

    work page 1992

  27. [27]

    A numerical solution for Hirota-Satsuma coupled KdV equation

    Mohammad Said Ismail and Hala Ashi. A numerical solution for Hirota-Satsuma coupled KdV equation. InAbstract and applied analysis, volume 2014, page 819367. Wiley Online Library, 2014

    work page 2014

  28. [28]

    AposteriorierrorestimatesforconservativelocaldiscontinuousGalerkinmethodsforthegeneralized Korteweg-de Vries equation.Communications in Computational Physics, 20(1):250–278, 2016

    OhannesKarakashianandYulongXing. AposteriorierrorestimatesforconservativelocaldiscontinuousGalerkinmethodsforthegeneralized Korteweg-de Vries equation.Communications in Computational Physics, 20(1):250–278, 2016

    work page 2016

  29. [29]

    Diederik Johannes Korteweg and Gustav De Vries. Xli. on the change of form of long waves advancing in a rectangular canal, and on a new typeoflongstationarywaves.TheLondon,Edinburgh,andDublinPhilosophicalMagazineandJournalofScience,39(240):422–443,1895

    work page

  30. [30]

    Jichun Li and Miguel R. Visbal. High-order compact schemes for nonlinear dispersive waves.Journal of Scientific Computing, 26(1):1–23, 2006

    work page 2006

  31. [31]

    A hamiltonian preserving discontinuous Galerkin method for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation

    Hailiang Liu and Nianyu Yi. A hamiltonian preserving discontinuous Galerkin method for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation. Journal of Computational Physics, 321:776–796, 2016

    work page 2016

  32. [32]

    A structure-preserving local discontinuous Galerkin method for the stochastic KdV equation.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 204:1–25, 2024

    Xuewei Liu, Zhanwen Yang, Qiang Ma, and Xiaohua Ding. A structure-preserving local discontinuous Galerkin method for the stochastic KdV equation.Applied Numerical Mathematics, 204:1–25, 2024

    work page 2024

  33. [33]

    Optimal error estimates of the Legendre–Petrov–Galerkin method for the Korteweg–de Vries equation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 39(4):1380–1394, 2001

    Heping Ma and Weiwei Sun. Optimal error estimates of the Legendre–Petrov–Galerkin method for the Korteweg–de Vries equation.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 39(4):1380–1394, 2001

    work page 2001

  34. [34]

    Rebecca Pereira.A New Conservative Discontinuous Galerkin Method for Wave Equations: Korteweg-de Vries and Extensions. Ph.d. thesis, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, Dartmouth, MA, 2023

    work page 2023

  35. [35]

    K. R. Raslan, Talaat S. El-Danaf, and Khalid K. Ali. Collocation method with quantic B-spline method for solving Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV equation.International Journal of Applied Mathematical Research, 5(2):123–131, 2016

    work page 2016

  36. [36]

    The decomposition method for a Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV equation and a coupled mKdV equation.International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 81(12):1497–1505, 2004

    Kamal R Raslan. The decomposition method for a Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV equation and a coupled mKdV equation.International Journal of Computer Mathematics, 81(12):1497–1505, 2004. M.S. Tariq et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 24 of 29 Conservative DG via Implicit Penalization for gKdV and HS–KdV

    work page 2004

  37. [37]

    Sadeeq, Faraj M

    Mohammed I. Sadeeq, Faraj M. Omar, and Mardan A. Pirdawood. Numerical solution of Hirota-Satsuma coupled KdV system by RBF–PS method.Journal of Duhok University, 25(2):164–175, 2022

    work page 2022

  38. [38]

    S. Yu. Sakovich. Coupled KdV equations of Hirota-Satsuma type.Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics, 6(3):255–262, 1999

    work page 1999

  39. [39]

    Petrov-Galerkin methods for nonlinear dispersive waves.Journal of Computational Physics, 39(1):94–102, 1981

    JM Sanz-Serna and Ian Christie. Petrov-Galerkin methods for nonlinear dispersive waves.Journal of Computational Physics, 39(1):94–102, 1981

    work page 1981

  40. [40]

    Discontinuous Galerkin methods: General approach and stability

    Chi-Wang Shu. Discontinuous Galerkin methods: General approach and stability. InNumerical Solutions of Partial Differential Equations, pages 149–201. Birkhäuser, Basel, 2009

    work page 2009

  41. [41]

    A. C. Vliegenthart. On finite-difference methods for the Korteweg-de Vries equation.Journal of Engineering Mathematics, 5(2):137–155, 1971

    work page 1971

  42. [42]

    AnalysisoflocaldiscontinuousGalerkinmethodswithimplicit-explicittimemarching for linearized KdV equations.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 62(5):2222–2248, 2024

    HaijinWang,QiTao,Chi-WangShu,andQiangZhang. AnalysisoflocaldiscontinuousGalerkinmethodswithimplicit-explicittimemarching for linearized KdV equations.SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 62(5):2222–2248, 2024

    work page 2024

  43. [43]

    A conservative finite element method for the Korteweg-de Vries equation.Mathematics of computation, 34(149):23–43, 1980

    Ragnar Winther. A conservative finite element method for the Korteweg-de Vries equation.Mathematics of computation, 34(149):23–43, 1980

    work page 1980

  44. [44]

    AgeneralizedHirota–SatsumacoupledKorteweg–deVriesequationandMiura transformations.Physics Letters A, 255(4-6):259–264, 1999

    YongtangWu,XianguoGeng,XingbiaoHu,andSimingZhu. AgeneralizedHirota–SatsumacoupledKorteweg–deVriesequationandMiura transformations.Physics Letters A, 255(4-6):259–264, 1999

    work page 1999

  45. [45]

    A new method for a generalized Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV equation.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217(17):7117–7125, 2011

    Manlin Xie and Xuanhao Ding. A new method for a generalized Hirota–Satsuma coupled KdV equation.Applied Mathematics and Computation, 217(17):7117–7125, 2011

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    Local discontinuous Galerkin methods for two classes of two-dimensional nonlinear wave equations.Physica D, 208(1–2):21–58, 2005

    Yan Xu and Chi-Wang Shu. Local discontinuous Galerkin methods for two classes of two-dimensional nonlinear wave equations.Physica D, 208(1–2):21–58, 2005

    work page 2005

  47. [47]

    Yan Xu and Chi-Wang Shu. Local discontinuous Galerkin methods for the Kuramoto–Sivashinsky equations and the Ito-type coupled KdV equations.Computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering, 195(25-28):3430–3447, 2006

    work page 2006

  48. [48]

    Optimal error estimates of the semidiscrete local discontinuous Galerkin methods for high order wave equations

    Yan Xu and Chi-Wang Shu. Optimal error estimates of the semidiscrete local discontinuous Galerkin methods for high order wave equations. SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis, 50(1):79–104, 2012

    work page 2012

  49. [49]

    A lumped Galerkin finite element method for the generalized Hirota-Satsuma coupled KdV and coupled mKdV equations.Tbilisi Mathematical Journal, 12(3):159–173, 2019

    Nuri Murat Yagmurlu, Berat Karaagac, and Alaattin Esen. A lumped Galerkin finite element method for the generalized Hirota-Satsuma coupled KdV and coupled mKdV equations.Tbilisi Mathematical Journal, 12(3):159–173, 2019

    work page 2019

  50. [50]

    AlocaldiscontinuousGalerkinmethodforKdVtypeequations.SIAMJournalonNumericalAnalysis,40(2):769– 791, 2002

    JunYanandChi-WangShu. AlocaldiscontinuousGalerkinmethodforKdVtypeequations.SIAMJournalonNumericalAnalysis,40(2):769– 791, 2002

    work page 2002

  51. [51]

    A direct discontinuous Galerkin method for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation: Energy conservation and boundary effect.Journal of Computational Physics, 242:351–366, 2013

    Na Yi, Yiting Huang, and Hailiang Liu. A direct discontinuous Galerkin method for the generalized Korteweg–de Vries equation: Energy conservation and boundary effect.Journal of Computational Physics, 242:351–366, 2013

    work page 2013

  52. [52]

    Conservative and dissipative local discontinuous Galerkin methods for Korteweg–de Vries type equations

    Qian Zhang and Yinhua Xia. Conservative and dissipative local discontinuous Galerkin methods for Korteweg–de Vries type equations. Commun. Comput. Phys., 25(2):532–563, 2019. A. Proof of Lemma 3.1 We write𝑆as 𝑆=𝑆 1 +𝑆 2 − 6𝑏 (𝑢ℎ𝑤ℎ,Π(𝑢 ℎ𝑣ℎ))− 6𝑏 (𝑢ℎ𝑤ℎ, 𝑟ℎ ),(26) M.S. Tariq et al.:Preprint submitted to ElsevierPage 25 of 29 Conservative DG via Implicit Pena...

    work page 2019