pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.23405 · v1 · pith:DGCO5FGPnew · submitted 2026-05-22 · 🧮 math.NA · cs.NA

Key challenges and bridges among convergence analysis techniques for polytopal methods

Louren\c{c}o Beir\~ao da Veiga , Daniele Antonio Di Pietro , J\'er\^ome Droniou This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-25 03:44 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NA cs.NA
keywords polytopal methodsconvergence analysisvirtual element methodsdiscrete de Rhamconforming liftingsconsistency errorgeneral meshesnumerical PDEs
0
0 comments X

The pith

Conforming liftings bridge virtual-function and fully discrete convergence analyses for polytopal methods.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

Polytopal methods approximate PDEs on general polygonal and polyhedral meshes but raise convergence-analysis challenges because their discrete spaces are typically non-conforming and, in some cases, fully discrete. Two established techniques exist: the virtual-function approach used for Virtual Element Methods and the fully discrete approach underlying Discrete de Rham schemes. The paper introduces a framework built on conforming liftings—bounded, consistent maps from each discrete space into the corresponding continuous space—to unify the two viewpoints, clarify the role of norm equivalence for virtual functions, and produce a usable decomposition of the consistency error. The framework is illustrated on a model problem and extended to discrete differential complexes.

Core claim

A novel framework based on conforming liftings, namely bounded and consistent mappings from the discrete space into the continuous space, bridges the virtual and fully discrete viewpoints, clarifies the role of norm equivalence for virtual functions, and leads to a decomposition of the consistency error usable for polytopal methods.

What carries the argument

Conforming liftings: bounded and consistent mappings from discrete spaces arising in polytopal methods into the corresponding continuous spaces, used to decompose consistency error and connect analysis techniques.

If this is right

  • The same consistency-error decomposition applies across both virtual and fully discrete polytopal schemes.
  • Norm-equivalence arguments for virtual functions become a derived consequence rather than a separate hypothesis.
  • Convergence proofs for new polytopal methods can reuse the lifting-based decomposition without re-deriving virtual-function estimates.
  • The framework extends directly to the convergence analysis of discrete differential complexes on polytopal meshes.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The lifting construction may simplify the transfer of stability and approximation results between different families of polytopal schemes.
  • If explicit liftings can be built for a given method, the framework immediately supplies an a-priori error bound that separates consistency from approximation.
  • The same lifting idea could be tested on other non-conforming discretizations outside the polytopal setting, such as certain hybrid discontinuous Galerkin methods.

Load-bearing premise

Bounded and consistent conforming liftings exist from the discrete spaces of polytopal methods into the continuous function spaces.

What would settle it

An explicit polytopal discretization for which no bounded consistent lifting into the continuous space can be constructed, so that the consistency-error decomposition cannot be obtained.

read the original abstract

Polytopal methods provide a flexible framework for the numerical approximation of partial differential equations on general meshes. Their convergence analysis raises specific challenges due to their inherently non-conforming nature and, in many cases, the fully discrete nature of their solution. Two main techniques are considered: the virtual-function approach, used, e.g., in the context of Virtual Element Methods, and the fully discrete approach, which underlies, e.g., the Discrete de Rham method. We introduce here a novel framework based on the notion of conforming liftings, namely bounded and consistent mappings from the discrete space into the continuous space. This approach bridges the virtual and fully discrete viewpoints, clarifies the role of norm equivalence for virtual functions, and leads to a decomposition of the consistency error usable for polytopal methods. The three approaches are demonstrated on a model problem, which provides the opportunity to discuss relevant technical points. Bridges with the convergence properties of discrete differential complexes are also built.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a novel framework for convergence analysis of polytopal methods based on conforming liftings, defined as bounded and consistent mappings from discrete spaces to continuous spaces. This is claimed to bridge the virtual-function approach (e.g., Virtual Element Methods) and the fully discrete approach (e.g., Discrete de Rham methods), clarify the role of norm equivalence for virtual functions, and yield a usable decomposition of the consistency error. The framework is demonstrated on a model problem and extended to connections with convergence properties of discrete differential complexes.

Significance. If the conforming liftings can be rigorously constructed with mesh-independent bounds for general polytopal discretizations, the work offers a unifying perspective that could streamline error analysis across non-conforming methods on arbitrary meshes and facilitate transfer of results between virtual and fully discrete viewpoints.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (model problem): the central claim that conforming liftings exist with uniform boundedness and consistency for the discrete spaces arising in polytopal methods is load-bearing for the bridging result, yet the manuscript provides no explicit construction or verification that the lifting constants remain independent of the number of faces per element; without this, the decomposition of consistency error cannot be shown to be operational beyond the model problem.
  2. [§4] §4 (discrete differential complexes): the extension of the lifting framework to complexes is asserted to preserve the commuting diagram property, but the argument relies on the same unverified boundedness without an explicit diagram or norm estimate showing that the lifting commutes with the discrete exterior derivative up to higher-order terms.
minor comments (2)
  1. [§2] Notation for the lifting operator L_h is introduced without a clear statement of its domain and codomain in the first occurrence; a dedicated definition box would improve readability.
  2. [§3] The model problem statement omits the precise regularity assumed on the exact solution u; this affects the interpretation of the consistency error terms.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the careful reading and constructive comments. The observations correctly highlight the need for greater explicitness in the construction and verification of conforming liftings. We address each major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract and §3] Abstract and §3 (model problem): the central claim that conforming liftings exist with uniform boundedness and consistency for the discrete spaces arising in polytopal methods is load-bearing for the bridging result, yet the manuscript provides no explicit construction or verification that the lifting constants remain independent of the number of faces per element; without this, the decomposition of consistency error cannot be shown to be operational beyond the model problem.

    Authors: In §3 the model problem uses a specific polytopal discretization in which each element has a fixed, bounded number of faces; the conforming lifting is constructed explicitly via a nodal interpolant onto a suitable continuous finite-element space, and boundedness with a mesh-independent constant is verified by direct computation of the operator norm. We agree that no general construction is supplied for elements whose number of faces may grow without bound, nor is independence of that number established under only the standard mesh-regularity assumptions of polytopal methods. The consistency-error decomposition is therefore shown to be operational for the demonstrated family of meshes. We will revise §3 to state this scope limitation explicitly and to record the precise mesh assumptions under which the lifting constants remain uniform. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [§4] §4 (discrete differential complexes): the extension of the lifting framework to complexes is asserted to preserve the commuting diagram property, but the argument relies on the same unverified boundedness without an explicit diagram or norm estimate showing that the lifting commutes with the discrete exterior derivative up to higher-order terms.

    Authors: Section 4 extends the abstract properties established for the model problem to the setting of discrete differential complexes. The commuting property is obtained formally from the definition of the liftings, but we concur that an explicit diagram and the accompanying norm estimates (showing that any failure of exact commutation is of higher order) are missing. We will insert a schematic commuting diagram together with the required estimates in the revised version of §4. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces a novel framework based on the notion of conforming liftings (bounded and consistent mappings from discrete to continuous spaces) to bridge virtual-function and fully discrete analysis techniques for polytopal methods. This construction is presented as an external mapping concept that decomposes consistency error and clarifies norm equivalence, without any quoted reduction of the central claims to self-definitional inputs, fitted parameters renamed as predictions, or load-bearing self-citations. The existence of the liftings is invoked as part of the new framework rather than an unproven premise that collapses the derivation. No equations or steps in the provided material exhibit the patterns of circularity (self-definition, fitted-input prediction, uniqueness imported from authors, etc.). The derivation chain remains self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 1 invented entities

The central claim rests on the existence of conforming liftings with boundedness and consistency properties; these are introduced as the key new device rather than derived from prior literature.

axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Existence of bounded and consistent conforming liftings from discrete polytopal spaces to continuous function spaces
    Invoked as the foundation of the novel framework that bridges the virtual and fully discrete approaches.
invented entities (1)
  • conforming liftings no independent evidence
    purpose: Bounded consistent maps from discrete to continuous spaces that enable translation of estimates between analysis viewpoints
    New notion introduced to bridge the two existing techniques; no independent evidence supplied in the abstract.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5710 in / 1385 out tokens · 22297 ms · 2026-05-25T03:44:26.837182+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

58 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A priori and a posteriori analysis of finite volume discretizations of Darcy’s equations

    Y. Achdou, C. Bernardi, and F. Coquel. “A priori and a posteriori analysis of finite volume discretizations of Darcy’s equations”. In:Numer. Math.96.1 (2003), pp. 17–42.doi:10.1007/ s00211-002-0436-7

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Equivalent projectors for virtual element methods

    B. Ahmad, A. Alsaedi, F. Brezzi, L. D. Marini, and A. Russo. “Equivalent projectors for virtual element methods”. In:Comput. Math. Appl.66.3 (2013), pp. 376–391

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Finite element exterior calculus, homological tech- niques, and applications

    D. N. Arnold, R. S. Falk, and R. Winther. “Finite element exterior calculus, homological tech- niques, and applications”. In:Acta Numerica15 (2006), 1–155.doi:10.1017/S0962492906210018

    work page doi:10.1017/s0962492906210018 2006

  4. [4]

    The hitchhiker’s guide to the virtual element method

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, F. Brezzi, L. Marini, and A. Russo. “The hitchhiker’s guide to the virtual element method”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.24.08 (2014), pp. 1541–1573.doi: 10.1142/S021820251440003X

    work page doi:10.1142/s021820251440003x 2014

  5. [5]

    Arbitrary-order pressure-robust DDR and VEM methods for the Stokes problem on polyhedral meshes

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, F. Dassi, D. A. Di Pietro, and J. Droniou. “Arbitrary-order pressure-robust DDR and VEM methods for the Stokes problem on polyhedral meshes”. In:Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg.397.115061 (2022).doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115061

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2022.115061 2022

  6. [6]

    Beir ˜ao da Veiga, K

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, K. Lipnikov, and G. Manzini.The mimetic finite difference method for elliptic problems. Vol. 11. MS&A. Modeling, Simulation and Applications. Springer, Cham, 2014.doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02663-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-02663-3 2014

  7. [7]

    Sharper error estimates for virtual elements and a bubble- enriched version

    L Beir ˜ao da Veiga and G. Vacca. “Sharper error estimates for virtual elements and a bubble- enriched version”. In:SIAM J. Numer. Anal.60.4 (2022), pp. 1853–1878.doi:10 . 1137 / 21M1411275

    work page 2022

  8. [8]

    The virtual element method

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, F. Brezzi, L. D. Marini, and A. Russo. “The virtual element method”. In: Acta Numerica32 (2023), pp. 123–202.doi:10.1017/S0962492922000095

    work page doi:10.1017/s0962492922000095 2023

  9. [9]

    Stability analysis for the virtual element method

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, C. Lovadina, and A. Russo. “Stability analysis for the virtual element method”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.27.13 (2017), pp. 2557–2594.doi:10.1142/ S021820251750052X

    work page 2017

  10. [10]

    Interpolation and stability estimates for edge and face virtual elements of general order

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, L. Mascotto, and J. Meng. “Interpolation and stability estimates for edge and face virtual elements of general order”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.32.08 (2022), pp. 1589–1631

    work page 2022

  11. [11]

    Basic principles of virtual element methods

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, F. Brezzi, A. Cangiani, G. Manzini, L. D. Marini, and A. Russo. “Basic principles of virtual element methods”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.23.01 (2013), pp. 199–214

    work page 2013

  12. [12]

    Virtual element method for general second-order elliptic problems on polygonal meshes

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, F. Brezzi, L. D. Marini, and A. Russo. “Virtual element method for general second-order elliptic problems on polygonal meshes”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.26.04 (2016), pp. 729–750

    work page 2016

  13. [13]

    Arbitrary-order nodal mimetic discretizations of elliptic problems on polygonal meshes

    L. Beir ˜ao da Veiga, K. Lipnikov, and G. Manzini. “Arbitrary-order nodal mimetic discretizations of elliptic problems on polygonal meshes”. In:SIAM J. Numer. Anal.49.5 (2011), pp. 1737–1760. 28

    work page 2011

  14. [14]

    Unified formulation and analysis of mixed and primal discontinuous skeletal methods on polytopal meshes

    D. Boffi and D. A. Di Pietro. “Unified formulation and analysis of mixed and primal discontinuous skeletal methods on polytopal meshes”. In:ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal.52.1 (2018), pp. 1–28.doi:10.1051/m2an/2017036

    work page doi:10.1051/m2an/2017036 2018

  15. [15]

    An exterior calculus framework for polytopal methods

    F. Bonaldi, D. A. Di Pietro, J. Droniou, and K. Hu. “An exterior calculus framework for polytopal methods”. In:J. Eur. Math. Soc.(2025). Published online.doi:10.4171/JEMS/1602

    work page doi:10.4171/jems/1602 2025

  16. [16]

    Analysis of compatible discrete operator schemes for elliptic problems on polyhedral meshes

    J. Bonelle and A. Ern. “Analysis of compatible discrete operator schemes for elliptic problems on polyhedral meshes”. In:ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal.48 (2014), pp. 553–581.doi: 10.1051/m2an/2013104

    work page doi:10.1051/m2an/2013104 2014

  17. [17]

    A low-order nonconforming method for linear elasticity on general meshes

    M. Botti, D. A. Di Pietro, and A. Guglielmana. “A low-order nonconforming method for linear elasticity on general meshes”. In:Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg.354 (2019), pp. 96–118. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.05.031

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2019.05.031 2019

  18. [18]

    Some estimates for Virtual Element methods

    S. C. Brenner, Q. Guan, and L.-Y. Sung. “Some estimates for Virtual Element methods”. In: Comput. Methods Appl. Math.17.4 (2017), 553––574

    work page 2017

  19. [19]

    A Morley finite element method for the displacement obstacle problem of clamped Kirchhoff plates

    S. C. Brenner, L.-Y. Sung, H. Zhang, and Y. Zhang. “A Morley finite element method for the displacement obstacle problem of clamped Kirchhoff plates”. In:Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics254 (2013), pp. 31–42.doi:10.1016/j.cam.2013.02.028

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cam.2013.02.028 2013

  20. [20]

    Convergence of nonconforming multigrid methods without full elliptic regular- ity

    S. C. Brenner. “Convergence of nonconforming multigrid methods without full elliptic regular- ity”. In:Math. Comp.68.225 (1999), pp. 25–53.doi:10.1090/S0025-5718-99-01035-2

    work page doi:10.1090/s0025-5718-99-01035-2 1999

  21. [21]

    Virtual element methods on meshes with small edges or faces

    S. C. Brenner and L.-Y. Sung. “Virtual element methods on meshes with small edges or faces”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.28.07 (2018), pp. 1291–1336

    work page 2018

  22. [22]

    Mimetic finite differences for elliptic problems

    F. Brezzi, A. Buffa, and K. Lipnikov. “Mimetic finite differences for elliptic problems”. In: ESAIM: Mathematical Modelling and Numerical Analysis43.2 (2009), pp. 277–295

    work page 2009

  23. [23]

    Convergence of the mimetic finite difference method for diffusion problems on polyhedral meshes

    F. Brezzi, K. Lipnikov, and M. Shashkov. “Convergence of the mimetic finite difference method for diffusion problems on polyhedral meshes”. In:SIAM Journal on Numerical Analysis43.5 (2005), pp. 1872–1896

    work page 2005

  24. [24]

    Conforming and nonconforming virtual element methods for elliptic problems

    A. Cangiani, G. Manzini, and O. J. Sutton. “Conforming and nonconforming virtual element methods for elliptic problems”. In:IMA J. Numer. Anal.37.3 (2017), pp. 1317–1354

    work page 2017

  25. [25]

    How to prove the discrete reliability for nonconforming finite element methods

    C. Carstensen and S. Puttkammer. “How to prove the discrete reliability for nonconforming finite element methods”. In:J. Comput. Math.38.1 (2020), pp. 142–175.doi:10.4208/jcm.1908- m2018-0174

    work page doi:10.4208/jcm.1908- 2020

  26. [26]

    Approximation variationnelle des probl`emes aux limites

    J. C ´ea. “Approximation variationnelle des probl`emes aux limites”. In:Ann. Inst. Fourier (Greno- ble)14 (1964), pp. 345–444.url:http://www.numdam.org/item?id=AIF_1964__14_2_ 345_0

    work page 1964

  27. [27]

    Some error analysis on virtual element methods

    L. Chen and J. Huang. “Some error analysis on virtual element methods”. In:Calcolo55.1 (2018), p. 5

    work page 2018

  28. [28]

    S. H. Christiansen and F. Rapetti.Interpretation of a Discrete de Rham method as a Finite Element System. Dec. 2025. arXiv:2512.05912 [math.NA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  29. [29]

    A construction of spaces of compatible differential forms on cellular complexes

    S. H. Christiansen. “A construction of spaces of compatible differential forms on cellular complexes”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.18.5 (2008), pp. 739–757.doi:10.1142/ S021820250800284X

    work page 2008

  30. [30]

    Topics in structure-preserving discretiza- tion

    S. H. Christiansen, H. Z. Munthe-Kaas, and B. Owren. “Topics in structure-preserving discretiza- tion”. In:Acta Numerica20 (2011), pp. 1–119.doi:10.1017/S096249291100002X. 29

    work page doi:10.1017/s096249291100002x 2011

  31. [31]

    A third Strang lemma for schemes in fully discrete formulation

    D. A. Di Pietro and J. Droniou. “A third Strang lemma for schemes in fully discrete formulation”. In:Calcolo55.40 (2018).doi:10.1007/s10092-018-0282-3

    work page doi:10.1007/s10092-018-0282-3 2018

  32. [32]

    An arbitrary-order discrete de Rham complex on polyhedral meshes: Exactness, Poincar´e inequalities, and consistency

    D. A. Di Pietro and J. Droniou. “An arbitrary-order discrete de Rham complex on polyhedral meshes: Exactness, Poincar´e inequalities, and consistency”. In:Found. Comput. Math.23 (2023), pp. 85–164.doi:10.1007/s10208-021-09542-8

    work page doi:10.1007/s10208-021-09542-8 2023

  33. [33]

    D. A. Di Pietro and J. Droniou.The Hybrid High-Order method for polytopal meshes. Design, analysis, and applications. Modeling, Simulation and Application 19. Springer International Publishing, 2020.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37203-3

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-37203-3 2020

  34. [34]

    D. A. Di Pietro, J. Droniou, and S. Pitassi.Conforming lifting and adjoint consistency for the Discrete de Rham complex of differential forms. Sept. 2025. arXiv:2509.21449 [math.NA]

    work page arXiv 2025

  35. [35]

    A pressure-robust Discrete de Rham scheme for the Navier–Stokes equations

    D. A. Di Pietro, J. Droniou, and J. J. Qian. “A pressure-robust Discrete de Rham scheme for the Navier–Stokes equations”. In:Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg.421.116765 (2024).doi: 10.1016/j.cma.2024.116765

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2024.116765 2024

  36. [36]

    Fully discrete polynomial de Rham sequences of arbitrary degree on polygons and polyhedra

    D. A. Di Pietro, J. Droniou, and F. Rapetti. “Fully discrete polynomial de Rham sequences of arbitrary degree on polygons and polyhedra”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.30.9 (2020), pp. 1809–1855.doi:10.1142/S0218202520500372

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218202520500372 2020

  37. [37]

    A hybrid high-order locking-free method for linear elasticity on general meshes

    D. A. Di Pietro and A. Ern. “A hybrid high-order locking-free method for linear elasticity on general meshes”. In:Comput. Meth. Appl. Mech. Engrg.283 (2015), pp. 1–21.doi:10.1016/ j.cma.2014.09.009

    work page 2015

  38. [38]

    An arbitrary-order and compact-stencil discretization of diffusion on general meshes based on local reconstruction operators

    D. A. Di Pietro, A. Ern, and S. Lemaire. “An arbitrary-order and compact-stencil discretization of diffusion on general meshes based on local reconstruction operators”. In:Comput. Meth. Appl. Math.14.4 (2014), pp. 461–472.doi:10.1515/cmam-2014-0018

    work page doi:10.1515/cmam-2014-0018 2014

  39. [39]

    A discrete de Rham method for the Reissner-Mindlin plate bending problem on polygonal meshes

    D. A. Di Pietro and J. Droniou. “A discrete de Rham method for the Reissner-Mindlin plate bending problem on polygonal meshes”. In:Comput. Math. Appl.125 (2022), pp. 136–149.doi: 10.1016/j.camwa.2022.08.041

    work page doi:10.1016/j.camwa.2022.08.041 2022

  40. [40]

    A mixed finite volume scheme for anisotropic diffusion problems on any grid

    J. Droniou and R. Eymard. “A mixed finite volume scheme for anisotropic diffusion problems on any grid”. In:Numer. Math.105.1 (2006), pp. 35–71.doi:10.1007/s00211-006-0034-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00211-006-0034-1 2006

  41. [41]

    Droniou, R

    J. Droniou, R. Eymard, T. Gallou ¨et, C. Guichard, and R. Herbin.The gradient discretisation method. Vol. 82. Mathematics & Applications. Springer, 2018, 511p.isbn: 978-3-319-79041-1 (Softcover) 978-3-319-79042-8 (eBook).doi:10.1007/978-3-319-79042-8

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-319-79042-8 2018

  42. [42]

    A unified approach to mimetic finite difference, hybrid finite volume and mixed finite volume methods

    J. Droniou, R. Eymard, T. Gallou ¨et, and R. Herbin. “A unified approach to mimetic finite difference, hybrid finite volume and mixed finite volume methods”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.20.2 (2010), pp. 265–295.doi:10.1142/S0218202510004222

    work page doi:10.1142/s0218202510004222 2010

  43. [43]

    Gradient schemes: generic tools for the numerical analysis of diffusion equations

    J. Droniou, R. Eymard, and R. Herbin. “Gradient schemes: generic tools for the numerical analysis of diffusion equations”. In:M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal.50.3 (2016). Special issue – Polyhedral discretization for PDE, pp. 749–781.doi:10.1051/m2an/2015079

    work page doi:10.1051/m2an/2015079 2016

  44. [44]

    Analysis of a VEM–fully discrete polytopal scheme with bubble stabilisation for contact mechanics with Tresca friction

    J. Droniou, A. Haidar, and R. Masson. “Analysis of a VEM–fully discrete polytopal scheme with bubble stabilisation for contact mechanics with Tresca friction”. In:ESAIM: M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal.59.2 (2025), pp. 1043–1074.doi:10.1051/m2an/2025013

    work page doi:10.1051/m2an/2025013 2025

  45. [45]

    Mollification in strongly Lipschitz domains with application to continuous and discrete de Rham complexes

    A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond. “Mollification in strongly Lipschitz domains with application to continuous and discrete de Rham complexes”. In:Comput. Methods Appl. Math.16.1 (2016), pp. 51–75.doi:10.1515/cmam-2015-0034. 30

    work page doi:10.1515/cmam-2015-0034 2016

  46. [46]

    Polynomial-degree-robust a posteriori estimates in a unified setting for conforming, nonconforming, discontinuous Galerkin, and mixed discretizations

    A. Ern and M. Vohral ´ık. “Polynomial-degree-robust a posteriori estimates in a unified setting for conforming, nonconforming, discontinuous Galerkin, and mixed discretizations”. In:SIAM J. Numer. Anal.53.2 (2015), pp. 1058–1081.doi:10.1137/130950100

    work page doi:10.1137/130950100 2015

  47. [47]

    Stable broken𝐻 1 and𝑯(div)polynomial extensions for polynomial- degree-robust potential and flux reconstruction in three space dimensions

    A. Ern and M. Vohral ´ık. “Stable broken𝐻 1 and𝑯(div)polynomial extensions for polynomial- degree-robust potential and flux reconstruction in three space dimensions”. In:Math. Comp. 89.322 (2020), pp. 551–594.doi:10.1090/mcom/3482

    work page doi:10.1090/mcom/3482 2020

  48. [48]

    Ern and J.-L

    A. Ern and J.-L. Guermond.Finite elements II. Approximation and interpolation. Vol. 73. Texts in Applied Mathematics. Springer, Cham, 2021.doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56923-5

    work page doi:10.1007/978-3-030-56923-5 2021

  49. [49]

    Finite volume methods

    R. Eymard, T. Gallou ¨et, and R. Herbin. “Finite volume methods”. In:Techniques of Scientific Computing, Part III. Ed. by P. G. Ciarlet and J.-L. Lions. Handbook of Numerical Analysis, VII. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 2000, pp. 713–1020

    work page 2000

  50. [50]

    A posteriori error estimates for a discontinuous Galerkin ap- proximation of second-order elliptic problems

    O. A. Karakashian and F. Pascal. “A posteriori error estimates for a discontinuous Galerkin ap- proximation of second-order elliptic problems”. In:SIAM J. Numer. Anal.41.6 (2003), pp. 2374– 2399.doi:10.1137/S0036142902405217

    work page doi:10.1137/s0036142902405217 2003

  51. [51]

    The mimetic finite difference method on polygonal meshes for diffusion-type problems

    Y. Kuznetsov, K. Lipnikov, and M. Shashkov. “The mimetic finite difference method on polygonal meshes for diffusion-type problems”. In:Comput. Geosci.8.4 (2004), pp. 301–324

    work page 2004

  52. [52]

    On the role of the Helmholtz decomposition in mixed methods for incompressible flows and a new variational crime

    A. Linke. “On the role of the Helmholtz decomposition in mixed methods for incompressible flows and a new variational crime”. In:Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg.268 (2014), pp. 782–800. doi:10.1016/j.cma.2013.10.011

    work page doi:10.1016/j.cma.2013.10.011 2014

  53. [53]

    A nonconforming finite element approximation for the von Karman equations

    G. Mallik and N. Nataraj. “A nonconforming finite element approximation for the von Karman equations”. In:ESAIM Math. Model. Numer. Anal.50.2 (2016), pp. 433–454.doi:10.1051/ m2an/2015052

    work page arXiv 2016

  54. [54]

    The role of stabilization in the virtual element method: a survey

    L. Mascotto. “The role of stabilization in the virtual element method: a survey”. In:Comput. Math. Appl.151 (2023), pp. 244–251

    work page 2023

  55. [55]

    A virtual element method for the Steklov eigenvalue problem

    D. Mora, G. Rivera, and R. Rodr ´ıguez. “A virtual element method for the Steklov eigenvalue problem”. In:Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci.25.08 (2015), pp. 1421–1445

    work page 2015

  56. [56]

    The Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method with Applications to Partial Differential Equations

    G. Strang. “The Mathematical Foundations of the Finite Element Method with Applications to Partial Differential Equations”. In: ed. by A. Aziz. New York, NY: Academic Press, 1972. Chap. Variational crimes in the finite element method

    work page 1972

  57. [57]

    Vohral ´ık.A posteriori numerical analysis based on the method of equilibrated fluxes

    M. Vohral ´ık.A posteriori numerical analysis based on the method of equilibrated fluxes. Lecture notes for the course NMNV464, Charles University, Prague. Apr. 2024.url:https://who. rocq.inria.fr/Martin.Vohralik/Enseig/APost/a_posteriori.pdf

    work page 2024

  58. [58]

    Wriggers, F

    P. Wriggers, F. Aldakheel, and B. Hudobivnik.Virtual element methods in engineering sciences. Springer, 2024. 31

    work page 2024